throbber
FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 05/23/2023 01:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 710702/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/23/2023
`
`SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY OF QUEENS
`----------------------------------------------------------------------X
`GILBERT VARGAS and SHIRLEY VARGAS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Index No.
`
`
`-against-
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SUMMONS
`
`
`COURTVIEW OWNERS CORP. and
`JOHN B. LOVETT & ASSOCIATES, LTD.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`------------------------------------------------------------------X Date of filing with clerk:
`
`To the above-named defendants:
`
`
`YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED to answer the complaint in this action and to serve a
`
`copy of your answer, or if the complaint is not served with this summons, to serve a notice of
`
`appearance, on the Plaintiff’s attorney within twenty (20) days after service of this summons,
`
`exclusive of the day of service, or within thirty (30) days after service is complete if this summons is
`
`not personally delivered to you within the State of New York. In case of your failure to answer,
`
`judgment will be taken against you by default for the relief demanded in the Complaint.
`
`The basis of the venue designated is the location of the subject property..
`
`The Price Law Firm, LLC
`
`
`
`
`Joshua C. Price, Esq.
`1115 Broadway - suite 1053
`New York, New York 10010
`212-675-1125
`
`
`
`Dated:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`New York, New York
`May 16, 2023
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant’s Addresses:
`COURTVIEW OWNERS CORP.
`C/O JOHN B. LOVETT & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
`109-15 14TH AVENUE
`COLLEGE POINT, NY 11356
`
`JOHN B. LOVETT & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
`109-15 14TH AVENUE
`COLLEGE POINT, NY11356
`
`1 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 05/23/2023 01:02 PM
`.
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 710702/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/23/2023
`
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`OF QUEENS
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`GILBERT
`
`VARGAS
`
`and SHIRLEY
`
`VARGAS
`
`X
`
`Index
`
`No.
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`-against-
`
`VERIFIED
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`OWNERS
`COURTVIEW
`CORP.
`& ASSOCIATES,
`JOHN B. LOVETT
`
`and
`
`LTD.,
`
`---------------------------------
`
`Defendant.
`
`x
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`GILBERT
`
`VARGAS
`
`and SHIRLEY
`
`VARGAS
`
`by and
`
`through
`
`their
`
`attorneys,
`
`THE PRICE
`
`LAW FIRM LLC,
`
`as and
`
`for
`
`their
`
`complaint
`
`herein,
`
`alleges
`
`as follows:
`
`1. GILBERT
`
`VARGAS
`
`and
`
`SHIRLEY
`
`VARGAS
`
`(hereinafter
`
`"Plaintiffs")
`
`are
`
`the
`
`shareholders
`
`of Apartment
`
`2C
`
`at
`
`123-35
`
`82 Road,
`
`Kew
`
`Gardens,
`
`New
`
`York
`
`11415
`
`(hereinafter
`
`"Subject
`
`Unit").
`
`2.
`
`Defendant,
`
`COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`CORP.
`
`is a cooperative
`
`housing
`
`corporation
`
`organized
`
`and existing
`
`pursuant
`
`to the laws
`
`of
`
`the State
`
`ofNew
`
`York,
`
`with
`
`a principal
`
`place
`
`ofbusiness
`
`within
`
`the State
`
`of New York,
`
`County
`
`of Queens.
`
`3.
`
`Defendant,
`
`JOHN
`
`B. LOVETT
`
`& ASSOCIATES,
`
`LTD.,
`
`is a corporation
`
`organized
`
`and
`
`existing
`
`pursuant
`
`to the
`
`laws
`
`of
`
`the State
`
`of New York,
`
`with
`
`a principal
`
`place
`
`of business
`
`within
`
`the State
`
`of New York,
`
`County
`
`of Queens.
`
`JURISDICTION
`
`AND VENUE
`
`4.
`
`This
`
`Court
`
`has jurisdiction
`
`over
`
`this
`
`action
`
`pursuant
`
`to C. P. L. R. § 301
`
`because
`
`all of
`
`the
`
`Defendants
`
`either
`
`reside
`
`or conduct
`
`business
`
`in the State
`
`of New York.
`
`Alternatively,
`
`this
`
`Court
`
`has jurisdiction
`
`pursuant
`
`to C. P. L. R. § 302 because
`
`all Defendants
`
`transact
`
`business
`
`in New York.
`
`2 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 05/23/2023 01:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 710702/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/23/2023
`
`5.
`
`Venue
`
`is proper
`
`in this Court
`
`under
`
`C. P. L. R. § 503(a).
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`FACTS
`
`6.
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`are
`
`and
`
`were
`
`at
`
`all
`
`relevant
`
`times
`
`prior
`
`to
`
`the
`
`date
`
`hereof
`
`and
`
`at
`
`all
`
`times
`
`hereinafter
`
`referred
`
`to,
`
`the
`
`proprietary
`
`lessee
`
`and
`
`owner
`
`and
`
`shareholder
`
`of
`
`record
`
`of
`
`COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`CORP.,
`
`appurtenant
`
`to andallocated
`
`to Apartment
`
`2C at 123-35
`
`82 Road,
`
`Kew Gardens,
`
`New York
`
`11415.
`
`7.
`
`That,
`
`Defendant,
`
`COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS CORP.,
`
`is and was
`
`at all
`
`relevant
`
`times
`
`prior
`
`to
`
`the date
`
`hereof
`
`and at all
`
`times
`
`hereinafter
`
`referred
`
`to,
`
`the proprietarylessorandownerofthe
`
`cooperative
`
`building
`
`located
`
`at Apartment
`
`2C at 123-35
`
`82 Road,
`
`Kew Gardens,
`
`New York
`
`11415.
`
`8.
`
`That,
`
`Defendant,
`
`JOHN B. LOVETT
`
`& ASSOCIATES,
`
`LTD.,
`
`is and was
`
`at all
`
`relevant
`
`prior
`
`hereof
`
`at all
`
`hereinafter
`
`referred
`
`the management
`
`times
`
`to
`
`the
`
`date
`
`and
`
`times
`
`to,
`
`company
`
`for COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`CORP.,
`
`and responsible
`
`for
`
`the management
`
`of
`
`the
`
`cooperative
`
`building
`
`located
`
`at 123-35
`
`82 Road,Kew
`
`Gardens,
`
`New York
`
`11415.
`
`9.
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`purchased
`
`the Subject
`
`Unit
`
`in October
`
`of 2001.
`
`10. Plaintiffshavelived
`
`in the Subject
`
`Unit
`
`for more
`
`than
`
`20 years.
`
`11. Plaintiffs
`
`do not
`
`have
`
`a mortgage
`
`on the Subject
`
`Unit.
`
`12. 123-35
`
`82nd
`
`Road,
`
`Kew Gardens,
`
`New York
`
`11415
`
`(hereinafter
`
`"Subject
`
`Building")was
`
`built
`
`in
`
`1948.
`
`13. There
`
`are
`
`129 residential
`
`units
`
`and
`
`5 commercial
`
`units
`
`in the Subject
`
`Building.
`
`14. On or
`
`about
`
`September
`
`1, 2021,
`
`approximately
`
`1/4
`
`of
`
`the
`
`ceiling
`
`of
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`primary
`
`bedroomcame
`
`down
`
`with
`
`all of
`
`the ceilingdebris
`
`on
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`bedroom
`
`furniture,
`
`causing
`
`damage
`
`to
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`bedroom,
`
`bed,
`
`television,
`
`and
`
`other
`
`chattel.
`
`3 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 05/23/2023 01:02 PM
`.
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`.
`
`INDEX NO. 710702/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/23/2023
`
`15. The
`
`collapsing
`
`of
`
`the
`
`ceiling
`
`on September
`
`1, 2021
`
`also
`
`caused
`
`damage
`
`to an adjacent
`
`bathroom.
`
`16. Plaintiffs
`
`were
`
`fortunate
`
`not
`
`to be home
`
`when
`
`the ceiling
`
`collapse
`
`happened,
`
`or else it would
`
`have
`
`fallen
`
`on top
`
`of
`
`them and
`
`caused
`
`them
`
`serious
`
`physical
`
`injury.
`
`17. The
`
`lack
`
`of
`
`response
`
`and accountability
`
`on behalf
`
`of
`
`the Defendant
`
`and the managing
`
`agent
`
`has
`
`significantly
`
`compromised
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`quality
`
`of
`
`life.
`
`18. An engineer's
`
`report
`
`(dated
`
`November
`
`13, 2021)
`
`recommended
`
`that Plaintiffs
`
`move
`
`from the
`
`Subject
`
`Unit
`
`until
`
`it was
`
`repaired.
`
`19. COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`CORP.
`
`and
`
`JOHN
`
`B.
`
`LOVETT
`
`& ASSOCIATES,
`
`LTD.
`
`(collectively
`
`referred
`
`to as the
`
`"Defendants")
`
`performed
`
`no work
`
`in the Subject
`
`Unit
`
`and
`
`have
`
`taken
`
`no
`
`steps
`
`to remediate
`
`the damage
`
`that was
`
`caused
`
`to the Subject
`
`Unit.
`
`the
`
`fact
`
`that
`
`the Subject
`
`Unit
`
`was
`
`20. Plaintiffs
`
`paid maintenance,
`
`notwithstanding
`
`occupying
`
`impossible,
`
`through
`
`November
`
`of 2021.
`
`21. The Defendants
`
`continues
`
`to bill
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`for maintenance
`
`even
`
`though
`
`it
`
`is impossible
`
`to
`
`occupy
`
`the Subject
`
`Unit.
`
`22. The
`
`occupants
`
`of Unit
`
`3C performed
`
`renovations
`
`in the beginning
`
`of 2020
`
`and beginning
`
`COVID-19
`
`to
`
`their
`
`primary
`
`bedroom
`
`when
`
`the
`
`former
`
`super
`
`and
`
`handyman
`
`of
`
`of
`
`COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`CORP.
`
`were
`
`working
`
`in Unit
`
`3C. At
`
`this
`
`time
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`saw a
`
`crack
`
`from the bedroom
`
`ceiling
`
`plus
`
`some
`
`slight
`
`debris
`
`coming
`
`out
`
`of
`
`the top
`
`of
`
`the ceiling
`
`radiator
`
`in the bathroom.
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`voiced
`
`their
`
`concern
`
`to Frank
`
`Gonzalez,
`
`the handyman,
`
`at
`
`the time
`
`and who
`
`was
`
`covering
`
`for Miguel
`
`Chacon
`
`(super)
`
`who was
`
`out with
`
`COVID.
`
`Frank
`
`told
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`that
`
`crack
`
`in the ceiling
`
`was
`
`the
`
`building
`
`settling,
`
`and
`
`he cleaned
`
`the debris
`
`4 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 05/23/2023 01:02 PM
`.
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`.
`
`INDEX NO. 710702/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/23/2023
`
`from the
`
`bathroom.
`
`He
`
`also
`
`told
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`that while
`
`no renovations
`
`were
`
`allowed
`
`during
`
`COVID,
`
`residents
`
`who
`
`had
`
`already
`
`started
`
`on renovations
`
`were
`
`allowed
`
`to fmish.
`
`23. When
`
`the
`
`occupants
`
`of Unit
`
`3C performed
`
`the
`
`renovations
`
`there
`
`was
`
`a lot
`
`of banging
`
`and
`
`vibrating
`
`noise
`
`in and
`
`above
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`ceiling
`
`in their
`
`primary
`
`bedroom.
`
`24. COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`was
`
`also
`
`extensive
`
`renovations
`
`to the balconies
`
`and
`
`CORP.
`
`doing
`
`for
`
`considerable
`
`time,
`
`loud
`
`noises
`
`and
`
`vibrations
`
`were
`
`heard
`
`and experienced
`
`by Plaintiffs.
`
`25.
`
`In August
`
`of 2021,
`
`a larger
`
`crack
`
`appeared
`
`in the
`
`ceiling.
`
`26. Defendants
`
`came
`
`and
`
`inspected
`
`the
`
`larger
`
`crack
`
`that
`
`appeared
`
`in August
`
`of 2021.
`
`Defendants'
`
`27.
`
`superintendent
`
`agreed
`
`that
`
`the larger
`
`crack was
`
`a serious
`
`problem
`
`that needed
`
`to
`
`be remedied
`
`but
`
`the
`
`Defendants'
`
`superintendent
`
`did not possess
`
`the knowledge
`
`or expertise
`
`damage
`
`or
`
`to adequately
`
`and
`
`properly
`
`assess
`
`the
`
`the cause
`
`thereof.
`
`28. The work
`
`performed
`
`by
`
`the
`
`occupants
`
`of Unit
`
`3C and COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`CORP.
`
`caused
`
`a fracture
`
`in
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`ceiling
`
`above
`
`their
`
`primary
`
`bedroom.
`
`29. Plaintiffs
`
`complained
`
`repeatedly
`
`to Defendant
`
`about
`
`the noise,
`
`vibrations,
`
`and
`
`the
`
`damage
`
`done
`
`to the
`
`ceiling.
`
`30. Defendants
`
`refused
`
`to send
`
`an engineer
`
`to inspect
`
`the larger
`
`crack.
`
`on the part
`
`of Defendants
`
`to have
`
`a professional
`
`or other
`
`such
`
`expert
`
`inspect
`
`31. After
`
`the refusal
`
`the larger
`
`crack,
`
`the ceiling
`
`collapsed.
`
`32. On September
`
`7, 2021,
`
`Defendants
`
`(through
`
`Brian
`
`Rappaport)
`
`emailed
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`to let
`
`them
`
`know
`
`that Defendants
`
`were
`
`investigating
`
`the
`
`ceiling
`
`collapse
`
`and
`
`that
`
`it was
`
`Defendants'
`
`belief
`
`that
`
`the
`
`occupants
`
`in Unit
`
`3C would
`
`be responsible
`
`for
`
`the
`
`damage.
`
`33. On September
`
`8, 2021,
`
`Defendants
`
`(through
`
`Brian
`
`Rappaport)
`
`informed
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`that
`
`a
`
`worker
`
`would
`
`visit
`
`Unit
`
`3C.
`
`5 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 05/23/2023 01:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 710702/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/23/2023
`
`34. The
`
`visit
`
`to Unit
`
`3C ended
`
`Defendants'
`
`investigation.
`
`35. On September
`
`10, 2021,
`
`Defendants
`
`(through
`
`Brian
`
`Rappaport)
`
`informed
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`that
`
`their
`
`investigation
`
`resulted
`
`in a determination
`
`that Unit
`
`3C was
`
`not
`
`the cause
`
`of
`
`the collapse.
`
`36. The
`
`Subject
`
`Unit
`
`remains
`
`unrepaired
`
`and
`
`remains
`
`uninhabitable.
`
`37. The
`
`ceiling
`
`collapse
`
`was
`
`caused
`
`by the construction
`
`in Unit
`
`3C,
`
`the construction
`
`performed
`
`by and COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`CORP.
`
`and
`
`the
`
`nonfeasance
`
`of Defendants.
`
`38. COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`CORP.
`
`has breached
`
`the proprietary
`
`lease
`
`by failing
`
`to repair
`
`the
`
`damage
`
`to the Subject
`
`Unit.
`
`39. The
`
`Subject
`
`Unit
`
`are and remain
`
`uninhabitable.
`
`have
`
`suffered
`
`damages
`
`$84,000.00
`
`in total
`
`to date which
`
`but are
`
`40. Plaintiffs
`
`exceeding
`
`include,
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to,
`
`the
`
`following:
`
`Engineer's
`
`Attorney's
`
`fees;
`
`fees;
`
`Ongoing
`
`Maintenance
`
`for
`
`the Subject
`
`Unit;
`
`Rent
`
`for
`
`alternative
`
`living
`
`arrangements
`
`due the uninhabitability
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Unit;
`
`a.
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`and
`
`e.
`
`Utilities
`
`for
`
`alternative
`
`living
`
`arrangements
`
`due the uninhabitability
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Unit.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST
`CAUSE
`of Contract)
`(Breach
`
`OF ACTION
`
`41. Plaintiffs
`
`repeat
`
`and
`
`re-allege
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`contained
`
`in all
`
`of
`
`the preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as though
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`at
`
`length
`
`herein.
`
`42. COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`CORP.
`
`and Plaintiffs
`
`are parties
`
`to a proprietary
`
`lease.
`
`6 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 05/23/2023 01:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 710702/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/23/2023
`
`43. The
`
`proprietary
`
`lease
`
`imposes
`
`on COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`CORP.
`
`the
`
`affirmative
`
`obligation
`
`to repair
`
`matters
`
`in the common
`
`areas
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Building.
`
`44. The
`
`proprietary
`
`lease
`
`also
`
`imposes
`
`on COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`CORP.
`
`the
`
`affmnative
`
`obligation
`
`to repair
`
`damage
`
`to the individual
`
`apartments
`
`of shareholders
`
`when
`
`the damage
`
`is
`
`caused
`
`by matters
`
`outside
`
`of
`
`those
`
`apartments.
`
`45. A crack
`
`formed
`
`in the
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`of
`
`the
`
`bedroom.
`
`ceiling
`
`primary
`
`46. The
`
`crack
`
`resulted
`
`in a ceiling
`
`collapse.
`
`47. The
`
`ceiling
`
`collapse
`
`was
`
`the fault
`
`of Defendants
`
`because
`
`Defendants
`
`permitting
`
`work
`
`to be
`
`performed
`
`in Unit
`
`3C and COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`CORP.
`
`performed
`
`construction
`
`all of
`
`which
`
`contributed
`
`to the
`
`damage
`
`to the Subject
`
`Unit.
`
`48. Plaintiffs
`
`are
`
`entitled
`
`to damages
`
`in an amount
`
`to be determined
`
`by
`
`the Court
`
`but
`
`in an
`
`amount
`
`that
`
`exceeds
`
`the jurisdictional
`
`limit
`
`of
`
`the Supreme
`
`Court.
`
`OF ACTION
`
`AS AND FOR A SECOND
`
`CAUSE
`
`(Negligence)
`
`49. Plaintiffs
`
`repeat
`
`and
`
`re-allege
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`contained
`
`in all
`
`of
`
`the preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as though
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`at
`
`length
`
`herein..
`
`50. That
`
`upon
`
`information
`
`and belief,
`
`Defendants
`
`intentionally
`
`or negligently
`
`disregarded
`
`their
`
`obligations
`
`to investigate
`
`conditions
`
`and make
`
`repairs
`
`to the Subject
`
`Unit.
`
`upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`Defendants
`
`failed
`
`supervise
`
`and
`
`51. That
`
`belief,
`
`negligently
`
`to inspect,
`
`oversee
`
`construction
`
`in Unit
`
`3C.
`
`52. The Plaintiffs
`
`have
`
`not
`
`able
`
`to reside
`
`in the Subject
`
`Unit
`
`since
`
`the collapse
`
`of
`
`the ceiling
`
`and
`
`the Subject
`
`Unit
`
`was
`
`and remains
`
`unfit
`
`for
`
`human
`
`habitation,
`
`was
`
`and remains
`
`unfit
`
`for
`
`the
`
`use intended,
`
`to wit
`
`residential
`
`occupancy,
`
`and Subject
`
`Unit
`
`had and still
`
`has conditions
`
`that
`
`were
`
`hazardous
`
`to the
`
`life,
`
`health,
`
`safety
`
`and welfare
`
`of Plaintiffs.
`
`7 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 05/23/2023 01:02 PM
`.
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`.
`
`INDEX NO. 710702/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/23/2023
`
`53. Due
`
`to
`
`Defendants'
`
`unwillingness
`
`to work
`
`with
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`towards
`
`a resolution
`
`or even
`
`discuss
`
`the
`
`issue
`
`in a collaborative
`
`manner
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`were
`
`forced
`
`to hire
`
`an independent
`
`engineer
`
`and
`
`legal
`
`counsel.
`
`54. Plaintiffs
`
`were
`
`also
`
`forced
`
`to leave
`
`their
`
`home
`
`because
`
`it was
`
`deemed
`
`uninhabitable
`
`and
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`both
`
`have
`
`compromised
`
`immune
`
`systems.
`
`55. The
`
`out
`
`of pocket
`
`expenses
`
`incurred
`
`by Plaintiffs
`
`to
`
`date
`
`has
`
`been
`
`quite
`
`significant
`
`and
`
`resulted
`
`in Plaintiffs
`
`taking
`
`money
`
`out
`
`of
`
`their
`
`retirement
`
`funds.
`
`56. Plaintiffs
`
`are
`
`entitled
`
`to damages
`
`in an amount
`
`to be
`
`determined
`
`by
`
`the Court
`
`but
`
`in an
`
`amount
`
`that
`
`exceeds
`
`the jurisdictional
`
`limit
`
`of
`
`the Supreme
`
`Court.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRD
`
`CAUSE
`
`AGAINST
`
`COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`OF ACTION
`CORP.
`of Habitability)
`
`(Warranty
`
`and
`
`each
`
`allegation
`
`57. Plaintiffs
`
`repeat
`
`re-allege
`
`and
`
`every
`
`contained
`
`in all
`
`of
`
`the
`
`preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as though
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`at
`
`length
`
`herein.
`
`58. Plaintiffs
`
`entered
`
`into
`
`possession
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Unit
`
`by
`
`a written
`
`Proprietary
`
`Lease
`
`with
`
`COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`CORP.
`
`59. The Subject
`
`Unit
`
`contained
`
`conditions
`
`which
`
`were
`
`dangerous
`
`to the life,
`
`health
`
`and safety
`
`of
`
`the Plaintiffs.
`
`60. The Plaintiffs
`
`notified
`
`Defendants
`
`and/or
`
`its agents
`
`of
`
`these
`
`conditions
`
`and COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`CORP.
`
`has
`
`failed
`
`to remedy
`
`them.
`
`61. COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`CORP.
`
`has
`
`been
`
`given
`
`reasonable
`
`opportunity
`
`to correct
`
`said
`
`conditions.
`
`62. Due
`
`to these
`
`conditions
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`have
`
`suffered
`
`damages,
`
`including,
`
`but not
`
`limited
`
`to,
`
`loss
`
`of use and
`
`occupancy
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Unit.
`
`8 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 05/23/2023 01:02 PM
`.
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`.
`
`INDEX NO. 710702/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/23/2023
`
`63. The maintenance
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Unit
`
`in the
`
`aforementioned
`
`condition
`
`and
`
`failure
`
`of
`
`the
`
`COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS CORP.
`
`to correct
`
`these
`
`conditions
`
`constitutes
`
`a breach
`
`of warranty
`
`of habitability
`
`for
`
`the Subject
`
`Unit
`
`and as a consequence
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`are entitled
`
`to abatement
`
`in an amount
`
`to be determined
`
`at
`
`trial.
`
`64. Plaintiffs
`
`are
`
`entitled
`
`to damages
`
`in an amount
`
`to be determined
`
`by
`
`the Court
`
`but
`
`in
`
`an
`
`amount
`
`that
`
`exceeds
`
`the jurisdictional
`
`limit
`
`of
`
`the Supreme
`
`Court.
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTH
`(Declaratory
`
`CAUSE
`
`OF ACTION
`
`Judgment)
`
`65. Plaintiffs
`
`repeat
`
`and
`
`re-allege
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`contained
`
`in all
`
`of
`
`the preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as though
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`at
`
`length
`
`herein.
`
`suffered
`
`collapse.
`
`66. Plaintiffs
`
`a ceiling
`
`67. The
`
`ceiling
`
`collapse
`
`was
`
`caused
`
`by
`
`the work
`
`that was
`
`performed
`
`immediately
`
`above
`
`the
`
`Subject
`
`Unit.
`
`68. Defendants
`
`should
`
`not
`
`have
`
`approved
`
`the work
`
`that
`
`took
`
`place
`
`in Unit
`
`3C,
`
`the unit
`
`above
`
`the
`
`Subject
`
`Unit.
`
`69. Defendants
`
`failed
`
`to properly
`
`supervise
`
`the work
`
`that was
`
`performed
`
`in the
`
`unit
`
`above
`
`the
`
`Subject
`
`Unit.
`
`70. The
`
`repair
`
`and
`
`remediation
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Unit
`
`is the responsibility
`
`of Defendants.
`
`71. Plaintiffs
`
`respectfully
`
`request
`
`a declaratory
`
`judgment
`
`in
`
`favor
`
`of Plaintiffs
`
`and
`
`against
`
`Defendant,
`
`COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`CORP.
`
`that COURTVIEW
`
`OWNERS
`
`CORP.
`
`is
`
`responsible
`
`for
`
`the
`
`repair
`
`and remediation
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Unit.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTH
`(Injunctive
`
`CAUSE
`
`OF ACTION
`
`Relief)
`
`9 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 05/23/2023 01:02 PM
`.
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`.
`
`INDEX NO. 710702/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/23/2023
`
`72. Plaintiffs
`
`repeat
`
`and
`
`re-allege
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`contained
`
`in all
`
`of
`
`the
`
`preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as though
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`at
`
`length
`
`herein.
`
`73. Plaintiffs
`
`have
`
`a likelihood
`
`of success
`
`on the merits
`
`of
`
`this
`
`lawsuit.
`
`74. Plaintiffs
`
`will
`
`suffer
`
`irreparable
`
`harm if
`
`injunctive
`
`relief
`
`is not
`
`granted.
`
`75. A balancing
`
`of
`
`the
`
`equities
`
`tips
`
`in favor
`
`of Plaintiffs.
`
`in favor
`
`76. Plaintiffs
`
`are entitled
`
`to an affinnative
`
`injunction
`
`of Plaintiffs
`
`and against
`
`Defendant
`
`compelling
`
`Defendant
`
`to repair
`
`and
`
`remediate
`
`the Subject
`
`Unit.
`
`AS AND FOR A SIXTH
`
`CAUSE
`
`OF ACTION
`
`(Declaratory
`
`Judgment)
`
`77. Plaintiffs
`
`repeat
`
`and
`
`re-allege
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`contained
`
`in all
`
`of
`
`the
`
`preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as though
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`at
`
`length
`
`herein.
`
`78. Plaintiffs
`
`been
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`of
`
`damage
`
`caused
`
`and
`
`have
`
`denied
`
`the use
`
`Unit
`
`because
`
`the
`
`permitted
`
`by Defendant.
`
`79. Plaintiffs
`
`cannot
`
`occupy
`
`the Subject
`
`Unit
`
`in its present
`
`condition.
`
`80. Plaintiffs
`
`request
`
`a declaratory
`
`judgment
`
`in their
`
`favor
`
`and against
`
`Defendant
`
`that
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`obligation
`
`to pay
`
`rent
`
`is abated.
`
`81. Plaintiffs
`
`repeat
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTH
`(Legal
`and
`
`and
`
`re-allege
`
`CAUSE
`
`OF ACTION
`
`Fees)
`every
`
`allegation
`
`contained
`
`in all
`
`of
`
`the
`
`preceding
`
`each
`
`paragraphs
`
`with
`
`the
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as though
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`at
`
`length
`
`herein.
`
`same
`
`force
`
`fully
`
`82. Plaintiffs
`
`repeat
`
`each
`
`and every
`
`allegation
`
`contained
`
`in this
`
`complaint
`
`as though
`
`more
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`herein.
`
`83.
`
`In the
`
`event
`
`that
`
`there
`
`is a contract
`
`between
`
`the
`
`parties
`
`that
`
`provides
`
`for
`
`an award
`
`of
`
`legal
`
`fees
`
`to the
`
`prevailing
`
`party
`
`then
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`demand
`
`a judgment
`
`against
`
`Defendant
`
`in
`
`an
`
`amount
`
`to be determined
`
`by
`
`the Court
`
`but
`
`in no event
`
`less
`
`than
`
`$25,000.
`
`10 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 05/23/2023 01:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 710702/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/23/2023
`
`WHEREFORE,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`demands
`
`judgment
`
`against
`
`Defendants
`
`on all causes
`
`of action,
`
`together
`
`with
`
`the
`
`costs
`
`and
`
`disbursements
`
`of
`
`this
`
`action,
`
`interest,
`
`punitive
`
`damages,
`
`treble
`
`damages,
`
`legal
`
`fees,
`
`along
`
`with
`
`such
`
`other
`
`and
`
`further
`
`relief
`
`as is just
`
`and
`
`proper.
`
`Dated:
`
`New York
`New York,
`16, 2023
`May
`
`submitted,
`Respectfully
`LAW FIRM LLC
`THE PRICE
`the Plaintiff
`Attorneys
`12*
`-
`1115
`Broadway
`New York,
`New York
`125
`67
`(212)
`
`for
`
`-
`
`Floor
`10010
`
`By:
`
`Jos
`
`a C. Price,
`
`Esq.
`
`11 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 05/23/2023 01:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 710702/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/23/2023
`
`VERIFICATION
`
`SHIRLEY
`
`VARGAS,
`
`being
`
`duly
`
`sworn,
`
`deposes
`
`as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I have
`
`read
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`complaint
`
`and
`
`I believe
`
`all
`
`of
`
`the matters
`
`asserted
`
`herein
`
`to be true.
`
`The
`
`source
`
`of my belief
`
`is my own
`
`personal
`
`knowledge.
`
`2.
`
`As
`
`to those matters
`
`stated
`
`upon
`
`information
`
`and belief,
`
`I believe
`
`those matters
`
`to
`
`be true.
`
`to before me this
`Sworn
`2023
`of May,
`
`day
`
`NOTARY
`
`PUBLIC
`
`S
`
`E
`
`R
`
`S
`
`ARTHUR
`G. FISCHER
`NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE
`OF NEW YORK
`No. 02Fl6357013
`Qualified
`in Nassau County
`My Commission
`Expires
`04-10--
`
`12 of 13
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 05/23/2023 01:02 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 710702/2023
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 05/23/2023
`
`VERIFICATION
`
`GILBERT
`
`VARGAS,
`
`being
`
`duly
`
`sworn,
`
`deposes
`
`as follows:
`
`1.
`
`I have
`
`read
`
`the foregoing
`
`complaint
`
`and
`
`I believe
`
`all of
`
`the matters
`
`asserted
`
`herein
`
`to be true.
`
`The
`
`source
`
`of my belief
`
`is my own
`
`personal
`
`knowledge.
`
`2.
`
`As
`
`to those matters
`
`stated
`
`upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`I believe
`
`those matters
`
`to
`
`be true.
`
`Sworn
`of
`
`day
`
`to before me this
`, 2023
`
`NOTARY
`
`PUBLIC
`
`GILBERT
`
`VAR
`
`S
`
`ARTHUR
`G. FISCHER
`NOTARY PUBLIC-STATE
`OF NEW YORK
`No. 02Fl6357013
`O'ualified
`in Nassau County
`My Commission
`04-10-
`Expires
`
`13 of 13
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket