throbber
FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2018 12:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 713791/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2018
`
`SUPREMECOURTOFTHESTATEOFNEW
`COUNTY
`OF QUEENS
`------------
`--------------------------------------------x
`DIANE
`
`CHUNG,
`
`YORK
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`-against-
`
`SAMSUNG
`
`ELECTRONICS
`
`AMERICA,
`
`INC.,
`
`--------------------------------------------------------------x
`
`To the above-named
`
`Defendant:
`
`Defendant.
`
`Index
`Date
`
`No.:
`Purchased:
`
`SUMMONS
`
`Based
`
`on place
`
`of
`
`Venue:
`occurrence
`
`SUMMONED
`YOU ARE HEREBY
`action
`within
`to the Complaint
`in this
`answer
`twenty
`or within
`of
`of service,
`the day
`exclusive
`(30)
`thirty
`to you within
`is not
`delivered
`Summons
`personally
`to appear
`and
`judgment
`will
`be taken
`failure
`answer,
`in the Complaint,
`together
`with
`the costs
`demanded
`
`and required
`
`to serve
`days
`after
`(20)
`after
`service
`days
`the State
`ofNew
`against
`you
`ofthis
`action.
`
`an
`
`attomeys
`Plaintiff's
`upon
`this Summons,
`the service
`of
`if
`this
`is complete
`of your
`York.
`In case
`by default
`for
`the relief
`
`Dated:
`
`September
`New York,
`
`7, 2018
`New York
`
`AHNE
`
`& JI, LLP
`
`.
`
`By:
`, Esq.
`Younghoon
`Attorneys
`for
`Plaintiff
`Suite
`1220
`Broadway,
`New York,
`NY 10001
`Tel.:
`594-1035
`(212)
`Fax:
`967-1112
`(212)
`
`502
`
`1 of 22
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2018 12:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 713791/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2018
`
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`SUPREME
`OF QUEENS
`COUNTY
`--------------------------------------------------------------------x
`DIANE
`CHUNG,
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`Index
`Date
`
`No.:
`Purchased:
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`VERIFIED
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`-against-
`
`SAMSUNG
`
`ELECTRONICS
`
`AMERICA,
`
`INC.,
`
`------------------------------------------------------------------x
`
`Defendant.
`
`Based
`
`on place
`
`of
`
`Venue:
`occurrence
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`DIANE
`
`CHUNG,
`
`by her attorneys,
`
`AHNE
`
`& JI, LLP,
`
`as and for
`
`her Complaint
`
`against
`
`Defendant,
`
`SAMSUNG
`
`ELECTRONICS
`
`AMERICA,
`
`INC.,
`
`alleges
`
`as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`DIANE
`
`CHUNG
`
`PARTIES
`
`("Plaintiff"
`
`individual
`
`residing
`
`in Nassau
`
`County,
`
`New York.
`
`or
`
`"Ms.
`
`Chung"),
`
`was
`
`and still
`
`is an
`
`2.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and belief,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`Electronics
`
`America,
`
`Inc.
`
`("Samsung"
`
`or
`
`"Defendant
`
`Samsung")
`
`was
`
`and still
`
`is a domestic
`
`corporation
`
`organized
`
`and
`
`under
`
`virtue
`
`ofNew
`
`York.
`
`existing
`
`and by
`
`ofthe
`
`laws
`
`ofthe
`
`State
`
`3.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`was
`
`and still
`
`is a foreign
`
`corporation
`
`authorized
`
`to do business
`
`under
`
`and
`
`by virtue
`
`ofthe
`
`laws
`
`ofthe
`
`State
`
`ofNew
`
`York.
`
`4.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and belief,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`has
`
`its principal
`
`executive
`
`office
`
`at 85 Challenger
`
`Road,
`
`Ridgefield
`
`Park, NJ 07660.
`
`5.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`conducted
`
`and carried
`
`on, and
`
`still
`
`conducts
`
`and
`
`carries
`
`on,
`
`business
`
`in the State
`
`ofNew
`
`York.
`
`6.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`transacted,
`
`and still
`
`transacts,
`
`business
`
`within
`
`the State
`
`ofNew
`
`York.
`
`2 of 22
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2018 12:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 713791/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2018
`
`7.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`derived,
`
`and still
`
`derives,
`
`substantial
`
`revenue
`
`from goods
`
`used
`
`or consumed
`
`or services
`
`rendered
`
`in the State
`
`ofNew
`
`York.
`
`8.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`expected
`
`or should
`
`have
`
`reasonably
`
`expected
`
`its acts
`
`to have
`
`consequences
`
`in the State
`
`ofNew
`
`York.
`
`9.
`
`Samsung
`
`has been maintaining,
`
`and still maintains,
`
`continuous
`
`and systematic
`
`it
`
`conducts
`
`business
`
`in the State
`
`contacts
`
`with,
`
`and within,
`
`the State
`
`ofNew
`
`York,
`
`and
`
`regularly
`
`ofNew
`
`York.
`
`10.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Samsung
`
`supplies
`
`consumer
`
`electronics
`
`and digital
`
`products
`
`in the United
`
`States,
`
`including
`
`the State
`
`ofNew
`
`York.
`
`11.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Samsung
`
`offers
`
`a range
`
`of digital
`
`products
`
`for
`
`the
`
`home
`
`and personal
`
`but
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to, LEDs
`
`and
`
`plasma
`
`TVs,
`
`home
`
`theater
`
`use,
`
`including,
`
`systems,
`
`camcorders,
`
`refrigerators,
`
`washers
`
`and dryers,
`
`ranges,
`
`dishwashers,
`
`microwave
`
`ovens,
`
`and vacuums.
`
`12.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Samsung
`
`also
`
`offers
`
`a range
`
`of
`
`technology
`
`products
`
`and solutions,
`
`such
`
`as LFDs,
`
`monitors,
`
`mobile
`
`computing
`
`products,
`
`notebooks,
`
`color
`
`and mono
`
`laser
`
`printers
`
`and copiers,
`
`solid
`
`state
`
`drives,
`
`set
`
`top
`
`boxes,
`
`and
`
`virtual
`
`desktop
`
`infrastructure
`
`to
`
`businesses
`
`in various
`
`industries,
`
`and medical
`
`imaging
`
`devices
`
`to healthcare
`
`providers.
`
`13.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Samsung
`
`researches,
`
`develops,
`
`and markets
`
`various
`
`personal
`
`and business
`
`communications
`
`products
`
`in North
`
`America,
`
`including
`
`handheld
`
`wireless
`
`phones,
`
`wireless
`
`communications
`
`infrastructure
`
`systems,
`
`fiber
`
`optics,
`
`and enterprise
`
`communication
`
`systems.
`
`14.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Samsung
`
`sells
`
`its products
`
`through
`
`retailers
`
`and
`
`resellers,
`
`as well
`
`as online.
`
`3 of 22
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2018 12:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 713791/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2018
`
`15.
`
`Prior
`
`to and
`
`including
`
`September
`
`3, 2018,
`
`Samsung
`
`was
`
`regularly
`
`engaged
`
`in the
`
`business
`
`of
`
`researching,
`
`designing,
`
`developing,
`
`manufacturing,
`
`fabricating,
`
`selling,
`
`distributing,
`
`marketing,
`
`servicing,
`
`and/or
`
`installing
`
`electronic
`
`wireless
`
`devices,
`
`including,
`
`but not
`
`limited
`
`to,
`
`the Samsung
`
`Galaxy
`
`Note
`
`9 cell
`
`phone
`
`(IMEI:
`
`358497090126596)
`
`(hereinafter
`
`referred
`
`to as the
`
`"Subject
`
`Phone").
`
`16.
`
`Sometime
`
`prior
`
`to September
`
`3, 2018,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`was
`
`the designer,
`
`manufacturer,
`
`marketer,
`
`distributor,
`
`supplier,
`
`and/or
`
`seller
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone,
`
`and
`
`it had
`
`distributed,
`
`marketed,
`
`sold,
`
`and/or
`
`supplied
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone.
`
`17.
`
`Sometime
`
`prior
`
`to September
`
`3, 2018,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`sold
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`to Verizon
`
`Communications,
`
`inc.
`
`18.
`
`Sometime
`
`prior
`
`to September
`
`3, 2018,
`
`Verizon
`
`Communications,
`
`Inc.
`
`purchased
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`from Defendant
`
`Samsung.
`
`19.
`
`At
`
`some
`
`time
`
`prior
`
`to September
`
`3, 2018,
`
`Verizon
`
`Communications,
`
`Inc.
`
`distributed,
`
`supplied,
`
`and/or
`
`sold
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`to Plaintiff,
`
`who
`
`purchased
`
`it
`
`for
`
`the
`
`purposes
`
`of using
`
`it
`
`for
`
`its intended
`
`use as a smartphone.
`
`20.
`
`In or around
`
`August
`
`2016,
`
`Samsung
`
`launched
`
`its Galaxy
`
`Note
`
`7, but
`
`"within
`
`weeks
`
`of
`
`the
`
`launch,
`
`Samsung's
`
`customers
`
`in South
`
`Korea
`
`reported
`
`that
`
`the phones
`
`were
`
`catching
`
`fire.
`
`Some
`
`had
`
`exploded.
`
`By Sept.
`
`2,
`
`the company
`
`stopped
`
`producing
`
`the phone
`
`and
`
`was
`
`sending
`
`replacements."
`
`"How Samsune moved beyond
`Tsukayama,
`Hayley
`htips:"inmyashillatoimipl.£oilizhuninewholettinslng
`lc8-b68
`phones/20I8
`U2/23/5675632e-182f-l
`
`phones,"
`
`its explodina
`February
`ilmyedshanothil±emloding
`I-2d4d462a1921
`story.html?noredirect=on&utm
`
`23, 2018, available
`
`at
`
`term=.bfacd743_fbea
`
`4 of 22
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2018 12:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 713791/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2018
`
`21.
`
`The U.S. Government
`
`recall
`
`of
`
`the Samsung
`
`Galaxy
`
`Note
`
`7 followed
`
`on
`
`September
`
`12, 2016;
`
`a second
`
`came
`
`in October
`
`2016
`
`when
`
`the
`
`replacement
`
`units
`
`had the same
`
`incendiary
`
`issues.2
`
`22.
`
`23.
`
`On or about
`
`August
`
`24, 2018,
`
`Samsung
`
`released
`
`its Galaxy
`
`Note
`
`9 to the market.
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung,
`
`as a manufacturer
`
`of smartphones,
`
`failed
`
`to adopt,
`
`implement,
`
`and
`
`utilize
`
`readily
`
`accessible
`
`technologies,
`
`which
`
`it was
`
`definitely
`
`aware
`
`of.
`
`24.
`
`For
`
`several
`
`years
`
`now,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`has been
`
`aware
`
`of
`
`the
`
`problems
`
`involving
`
`its smartphones
`
`excessively
`
`overheating,
`
`smoking,
`
`and
`
`combusting
`
`during
`
`normal
`
`use
`
`and conditions,
`
`most
`
`notably
`
`due to the
`
`issues
`
`involving
`
`its Galaxy
`
`Note
`
`7.
`
`25.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and belief,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`was
`
`responsible
`
`for
`
`the safe
`
`design
`
`and/or
`
`manufacture
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone.
`
`26.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`Defendant
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Samsung
`
`sold
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`and
`
`introduced
`
`it
`
`into
`
`the stream
`
`of commerce.
`
`27.
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`did
`
`not
`
`implement,
`
`adopt,
`
`or utilize
`
`readily
`
`accessible
`
`technologies,
`
`which
`
`would
`
`reduce
`
`the
`
`probability
`
`of a fire
`
`or explosion,
`
`and
`
`instead
`
`relied
`
`on
`
`other
`
`technologies
`
`that were
`
`proven
`
`to be defective.
`
`28.
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung's
`
`Galaxy
`
`Note
`
`9,
`
`including
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone,
`
`was defective
`
`in that
`
`and/or
`
`its risks
`
`outweighed
`
`its utility
`
`and/or
`
`in that
`
`a practical,
`
`feasible,
`
`and
`
`safer
`
`design
`
`technologies
`
`existed
`
`that would
`
`have
`
`reduced
`
`or prevented
`
`the
`
`propensity
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`to
`
`catch
`
`fire
`
`and explode.
`
`29.
`
`Had Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`implemented,
`
`adopted,
`
`or utilized
`
`this
`
`available,
`
`safer
`
`technology
`
`on the Subject
`
`Phone,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`may
`
`not
`
`have
`
`been
`
`injured,
`
`or, her
`
`injury
`
`would
`
`have
`
`been
`
`dramatically
`
`reduced.
`
`5 of 22
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2018 12:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 713791/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2018
`
`30.
`
`As a result
`
`of said
`
`accident,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has suffered
`
`severe
`
`pain, mental
`
`anguish,
`
`humiliation,
`
`and embarrassment,
`
`and
`
`she will
`
`continue
`
`to suffer
`
`same
`
`for
`
`an indefinite
`
`period
`
`of
`
`time
`
`in the future,
`
`and that Plaintiff
`
`has been
`
`unable
`
`to attend
`
`her daily
`
`chores,
`
`duties,
`
`and
`
`occupations,
`
`as she lost
`
`all of her
`
`clients'
`
`contact
`
`information,
`
`and
`
`she will
`
`be unable
`
`to do so for
`
`an indefinite
`
`time
`
`in the
`
`future,
`
`resulting
`
`in her great
`
`financial
`
`detriment
`
`and
`
`loss.
`
`FACTUAL
`
`ALLEGATIONS
`
`31.
`
`On or about
`
`August
`
`29, 2018, Ms. Chung
`
`went
`
`to a Verizon
`
`retail
`
`store,
`
`located
`
`at
`
`335 N. Broadway,
`
`Jericho,
`
`NY 11753,
`
`with
`
`the
`
`intention
`
`to purchase
`
`a Samsung
`
`Galaxy
`
`Note
`
`9
`
`cell
`
`phone.
`
`32.
`
`33.
`
`Ms. Chung
`
`ultimately
`
`purchased
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`on that
`
`date
`
`at said
`
`location.
`
`On or about
`
`September
`
`3, 2018,
`
`at or around
`
`12:02
`
`AM,
`
`in'Bayside,
`
`Queens,
`
`while
`
`Ms. Chung
`
`was
`
`in an enclosed
`
`elevator
`
`by herself,
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`became
`
`extremely
`
`hot,
`
`and
`
`for
`
`that
`
`reason,
`
`Ms. Chung
`
`stopped
`
`using
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`and placed
`
`it
`
`in her bag.
`
`34.
`
`Shortly
`
`after
`
`placing
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`in her bag,
`
`she heard
`
`a whistling
`
`and
`
`screeching
`
`sound,
`
`and
`
`she noticed
`
`thick
`
`smoke
`
`ascending
`
`from her bag.
`
`35.
`
`The Subject
`
`Phone
`
`began
`
`and continued
`
`to smoke,
`
`causing
`
`the entire
`
`elevator
`
`to
`
`quickly
`
`fill with
`
`thick
`
`smoke.
`
`36.
`
`Suddenly
`
`and without
`
`warning,
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`exploded
`
`and caught
`
`fire
`
`in Ms.
`
`Chung's
`
`bag.
`
`37.
`
`Ms. Chung
`
`immediately
`
`put down
`
`her bag on the elevator
`
`floor
`
`and began
`
`taking
`
`items
`
`out
`
`of her bag.
`
`38.
`
`Because
`
`the smoke
`
`was
`
`so thick
`
`inside
`
`the elevator,
`
`Ms. Chung
`
`could
`
`not
`
`ascertain
`
`what
`
`items
`
`she was
`
`taking
`
`out
`
`of her bag.
`
`6 of 22
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2018 12:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 713791/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2018
`
`39.
`
`While
`
`she was
`
`taking
`
`items
`
`out
`
`of her bag, Ms. Chung
`
`grabbed
`
`something
`
`extremely
`
`hot
`
`and
`
`immediately
`
`felt
`
`her
`
`fingers
`
`burn.
`
`40.
`
`Ms. Chung
`
`threw
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone,
`
`which
`
`was
`
`caught
`
`on fire,
`
`to the elevator
`
`floor.
`
`41.
`
`As
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`was
`
`on fire
`
`and continued
`
`to emit
`
`smoke,
`
`Ms. Chung
`
`frantically
`
`tried
`
`to escape
`
`from the elevator,
`
`as she reasonably
`
`feared
`
`that
`
`she might
`
`sustain
`
`serious
`
`physical
`
`injury
`
`or possible
`
`death,
`
`by abruptly
`
`pressing
`
`random
`
`elevator
`
`buttons.
`
`42.
`
`Ms. Chung
`
`became
`
`extremely
`
`panicked
`
`because
`
`she could
`
`not
`
`immediately
`
`escape
`
`from the elevator
`
`while
`
`this
`
`incident
`
`was
`
`unfolding.
`
`43.
`
`When
`
`the elevator
`
`door
`
`finally
`
`opened,
`
`Ms. Chung
`
`tried
`
`to push
`
`the Subject
`
`of
`
`the elevator
`
`with
`
`her
`
`but
`
`because
`
`it was
`
`still
`
`Phone
`
`out
`
`finger,
`
`extremely
`
`hot,
`
`and was
`
`on fire,
`
`she kicked
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`out
`
`of
`
`the elevator
`
`to the
`
`lobby
`
`area where
`
`it continued
`
`to burn.
`
`44.
`
`Two
`
`gentlemen
`
`in the
`
`lobby
`
`area
`
`aided Ms. Chung
`
`because
`
`she was
`
`clearly
`
`shaken
`
`up.
`
`45.
`
`One
`
`of
`
`the
`
`gentlemen
`
`picked
`
`up the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`using
`
`a cloth
`
`shield
`
`and put
`
`it
`
`under
`
`running
`
`water
`
`in a sink.
`
`46.
`
`The Subject
`
`Phone
`
`continued
`
`to smoke
`
`despite
`
`the
`
`gentleman's
`
`attempt
`
`of putting
`
`it under
`
`running
`
`water.
`
`47.
`
`The
`
`same
`
`gentleman
`
`retrieved
`
`a bucket
`
`filled
`
`with
`
`water
`
`and submerged
`
`the
`
`Subject
`
`Phone.
`
`48.
`
`Although
`
`Ms. Chung
`
`was
`
`able
`
`to remove
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`out of her bag
`
`eventually,
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`ignited
`
`her
`
`bag along
`
`with
`
`its contents,
`
`causing
`
`her property
`
`damages.
`
`7 of 22
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2018 12:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 713791/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2018
`
`49.
`
`Although
`
`Ms. Chung
`
`was
`
`able
`
`to remove
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`out
`
`of
`
`the enclosed
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`caused
`
`the entire
`
`elevator
`
`to fill with
`
`thick
`
`smoke,
`
`leaving
`
`Ms.
`
`in shock
`
`and extreme
`
`emotional
`
`suffering.
`
`50.
`
`The Subject
`
`Phone
`
`was
`
`completely
`
`charred
`
`and destroyed
`
`as a result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`elevator,
`
`Chung
`
`explosion.
`
`51.
`
`The Subject
`
`Phone
`
`explosion
`
`and
`
`concurrent
`
`fire
`
`caused
`
`extensive
`
`damages
`
`to Ms.
`
`Chung,
`
`including,
`
`but not
`
`limited
`
`to, burns
`
`to her
`
`right
`
`thumb
`
`and
`
`index
`
`fingers,
`
`loss of
`
`important
`
`data
`
`saved
`
`in her phone,
`
`including,
`
`but
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to,
`
`clients'
`
`contact
`
`information
`
`and
`
`important
`
`legal
`
`documents,
`
`and her
`
`inability
`
`to contact
`
`her
`
`clients,
`
`lost wages
`
`and earning
`
`due to her
`
`inability
`
`to contact
`
`her
`
`clients,3
`
`and her emotional
`
`distress
`
`and suffering,
`
`capacity
`
`mental
`
`anguish,
`
`humiliation,
`
`and
`
`embarrassment,
`
`caused
`
`by the traumatic
`
`experience
`
`of being
`
`trapped
`
`in an elevator
`
`by herself
`
`with
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`combusting
`
`and
`
`filling
`
`the elevator
`
`with
`
`smoke.
`
`52.
`
`As a result
`
`of Defendant
`
`Samsung's
`
`negligence,
`
`strict
`
`product
`
`liability,
`
`and other
`
`liability
`
`producing
`
`conduct
`
`and the explosion
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`and concurrent
`
`fire, Ms.
`
`Chung
`
`not
`
`only
`
`sustained
`
`physical
`
`injury,
`
`but
`
`also
`
`sustained
`
`emotional
`
`injury
`
`caused
`
`by the
`
`traumatic
`
`experience.
`
`Additionally,
`
`Ms. Chung
`
`sustained
`
`property
`
`damages
`
`due to the explosion
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`and concurrent
`
`fire
`
`that
`
`began
`
`in her bag.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST
`
`CAUSE
`
`OF ACTION
`
`53.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats,
`
`reiterates,
`
`reincorporates,
`
`and realleges
`
`the allegations
`
`contained
`
`in all preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as if or as though
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`herein.
`
`3 Ms. Chung's
`is a real estate agent, and due to the nature of her work and job duties and responsibilities,
`occupation
`relies on her cell phone and the data saved in her phone.
`she heavily
`
`8 of 22
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2018 12:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 713791/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2018
`
`54.
`
`Samsung
`
`is engaged
`
`in the business
`
`of selling,
`
`manufacturing,
`
`designing,
`
`developing,
`
`testing,
`
`assembling,
`
`supplying,
`
`importing,
`
`selling,
`
`and
`
`distributing
`
`electronics
`
`to the
`
`public,
`
`including
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`purchased
`
`and
`
`used
`
`by Plaintiff
`
`herein.
`
`55.
`
`Samsung
`
`placed
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`in the
`
`stream
`
`of commerce
`
`for
`
`sale through
`
`retailers
`
`with
`
`knowledge
`
`that
`
`it would
`
`be used without
`
`inspecting
`
`for
`
`dangers
`
`or defects.
`
`56.
`
`The Subject
`
`Phone
`
`was
`
`designed
`
`and/or
`
`manufactured.
`
`defectively
`
`57.
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`and/or
`
`its company
`
`negligently,
`
`carelessly,
`
`and recklessly
`
`manufactured,
`
`designed,
`
`fabricated,
`
`constructed,
`
`assembled,
`
`sold,
`
`and delivered
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone,
`
`which
`
`injured
`
`Plaintiff.
`
`58.
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung,
`
`by
`
`its officers,
`
`agents,
`
`servants,
`
`and/or
`
`employees,
`
`and/or
`
`its
`
`officers,
`
`agents,
`
`servants,
`
`and/or
`
`employees,
`
`were
`
`careless,
`
`reckless,
`
`and
`
`negligent
`
`in the
`
`following
`
`ways
`
`in which
`
`it manufactured,
`
`designed,
`
`fabricated,
`
`constructed,
`
`delivered,
`
`and sold
`
`of safe
`
`in that
`
`it permitted
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`so as to cause
`
`the
`
`same
`
`to be incapable
`
`operation;
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`to enter
`
`into
`
`the
`
`stream
`
`of commerce
`
`and to be used
`
`by the general
`
`public
`
`knowing
`
`that
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`was
`
`imperfectly
`
`designed,
`
`manufactured,
`
`and fabricated;
`
`in that
`
`it
`
`failed
`
`to manufacture,
`
`fabricate,
`
`design,
`
`construct,
`
`and
`
`assemble
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`in
`
`accordance
`
`with
`
`industry
`
`standards
`
`and the state
`
`of
`
`the art;
`
`in that
`
`it
`
`failed
`
`to take
`
`those
`
`precautions
`
`the
`
`course
`
`construction,
`
`testing,
`
`assembly,
`
`during
`
`of manufacture,
`
`design,
`
`fabrication,
`
`and delivery
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone,
`
`so as to avoid
`
`the occurrence
`
`of
`
`the accident
`
`involving
`
`Plaintiff
`
`as hereinafter
`
`described;
`
`in that
`
`it
`
`failed
`
`to eliminate
`
`hazards
`
`existing
`
`under
`
`reasonably
`
`foreseeable
`
`conditions
`
`of service
`
`and
`
`commerce,
`
`including
`
`intended
`
`use and reasonably
`
`foreseeable
`
`misuse
`
`by engineering
`
`means
`
`at
`
`the earliest
`
`feasible
`
`state
`
`of
`
`the design,
`
`fabrication,
`
`manufacture,
`
`construction,
`
`or assemble
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone;
`
`in that
`
`it
`
`failed
`
`to eliminate
`
`hazards
`
`9 of 22
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2018 12:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 713791/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2018
`
`existing
`
`under
`
`reasonably
`
`foreseeable
`
`conditions
`
`of
`
`service
`
`and
`
`commerce,
`
`including
`
`intended
`
`use and
`
`reasonable
`
`foreseeable
`
`use
`
`and misuse.
`
`59.
`
`Samsung
`
`knew
`
`or should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`that
`
`the
`
`ultimate
`
`users,
`
`operators,
`
`or
`
`consumers
`
`would
`
`not
`
`or could
`
`not
`
`properly
`
`inspect
`
`these
`
`products
`
`for
`
`dangerous
`
`conditions
`
`and
`
`such
`
`would
`
`be beyond
`
`the
`
`capabilities
`
`of
`
`such
`
`persons.
`
`that
`
`the
`
`detection
`
`of
`
`defects
`
`and
`
`dangers
`
`60.
`
`The
`
`Subject
`
`Phone
`
`was,
`
`as designed,
`
`manufactured,
`
`recommended,
`
`and
`
`supplied,
`
`defective
`
`and
`
`unreasonably
`
`dangerous
`
`and
`
`unsafe
`
`for
`
`its
`
`intended
`
`use
`
`in that
`
`the
`
`product
`
`would,
`
`without
`
`warning,
`
`explode
`
`and
`
`cause
`
`a fire.
`
`61.
`
`The
`
`Subject
`
`Phone
`
`was
`
`not
`
`reasonably
`
`fit,
`
`suitable,
`
`or safe
`
`to the
`
`ultimate
`
`purposes
`
`when
`
`operators
`
`or consumers
`
`for
`
`its
`
`intended
`
`use
`
`or
`
`reasonably
`
`foreseeable
`
`manufactured,
`
`designed,
`
`tested,
`
`assembled,
`
`supplied,
`
`imported,
`
`distributed,
`
`and/or
`
`sold
`
`by
`
`Samsung
`
`as follows:
`
`a.
`
`The
`
`Subject
`
`Phone
`
`was manufactured,
`
`designed,
`
`tested,
`
`assembled,
`
`supplied,
`
`imported,
`
`distributed,
`
`and/or
`
`sold
`
`in an unsafe,
`
`unsuitable,
`
`unreasonably
`
`dangerous
`
`and
`
`defective
`
`condition
`
`such
`
`that
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`had
`
`an
`
`to become
`
`hot
`
`and
`
`combust
`
`unreasonable
`
`propensity
`
`excessively
`
`during
`
`normal
`
`and
`
`foreseeable
`
`use
`
`and
`
`conditions;
`
`b.
`
`The
`
`Subject
`
`Phone
`
`was manufactured,
`
`designed,
`
`tested,
`
`assembled,
`
`supplied,
`
`imported,
`
`distributed,
`
`and/or
`
`sold
`
`in an unsafe,
`
`unsuitable,
`
`unreasonably
`
`dangerous
`
`and
`
`defective
`
`condition
`
`such
`
`that
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`had
`
`an
`
`unreasonable
`
`propensity
`
`to become
`
`excessively
`
`hot
`
`and
`
`explode
`
`during
`
`normal
`
`and
`
`foreseeable
`
`use
`
`and
`
`conditions;
`
`10 of 22
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2018 12:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 713791/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2018
`
`c.
`
`The Subject
`
`Phone
`
`was
`
`defective
`
`in its design,
`
`manufacture,
`
`and warnings,
`
`in
`
`that
`
`it
`
`failed
`
`to operate
`
`as marketed
`
`and
`
`advertised,
`
`and
`
`it
`
`failed
`
`to alert
`
`users
`
`to the hazardous
`
`conditions
`
`described
`
`herein;
`
`d.
`
`The Subject
`
`Phone
`
`was
`
`defective
`
`due to inadequate,
`
`or
`
`the absence
`
`of,
`
`warnings
`
`or
`
`instructions,
`
`including
`
`warning
`
`stickers,
`
`placards,
`
`or proper
`
`documentation
`
`to alert
`
`users
`
`regarding
`
`the
`
`hazardous
`
`conditions
`
`described
`
`herein;
`
`and
`
`e.
`
`The Subject
`
`Phone
`
`was
`
`defective
`
`in that
`
`its risks
`
`outweighed
`
`its utility
`
`and/or
`
`in that
`
`a more
`
`practical,
`
`feasible,
`
`and safer
`
`alternative
`
`design
`
`existed
`
`that
`
`would
`
`have
`
`reduced
`
`or prevented
`
`the propensity
`
`ofthe
`
`lithium-ion
`
`battery
`
`to
`
`explode.
`
`Phone
`
`at
`
`the time
`
`and at
`
`the time
`
`ofthe
`
`explosion
`
`62.
`
`The Subject
`
`was,
`
`of purchase,
`
`and
`
`fire,
`
`in the same
`
`condition
`
`as when manufactured
`
`and/or
`
`sold
`
`by Samsung.
`
`63.
`
`At
`
`the time
`
`Samsung
`
`designed,
`
`manufactured,
`
`recommended,
`
`and supplied
`
`the
`
`Subject
`
`Phone
`
`to Plaintiffherein,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`knew
`
`or should
`
`have
`
`known
`
`that
`
`the
`
`Subject
`
`Phone
`
`was
`
`defective.
`
`64.
`
`Despite
`
`that
`
`knowledge,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`failed
`
`to warn
`
`Plaintiff
`
`at any
`
`time
`
`ofthe
`
`substantial
`
`risk
`
`that
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`would
`
`explode
`
`and combust.
`
`65.
`
`As a direct,
`
`proximate,
`
`and
`
`foreseeable
`
`result
`
`ofthe
`
`above-stated
`
`defects
`
`and
`
`unreasonably
`
`dangerous
`
`condition,
`
`and the failure
`
`of Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`to properly
`
`warn
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`as herein
`
`alleged,
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`combusted
`
`and
`
`ultimately
`
`exploded
`
`on September
`
`3, 2018,
`
`resulting
`
`in substantial
`
`damages
`
`to Plaintiff.
`
`11 of 22
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2018 12:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 713791/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2018
`
`66.
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`damages
`
`were
`
`caused
`
`by Defendant
`
`Samsung's
`
`defective
`
`design
`
`and/or
`
`manufacture
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone.
`
`67.
`
`As a direct
`
`and
`
`proximate
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the foregoing
`
`negligence
`
`of Defendant
`
`Samsung,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has suffered
`
`severe
`
`pain, mental
`
`anguish,
`
`humiliation,
`
`and embarrassment,
`
`and she will
`
`continue
`
`to suffer
`
`same
`
`for
`
`an indefinite
`
`period
`
`of
`
`time
`
`in the future,
`
`and that
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has been
`
`unable
`
`to attend
`
`and occupations,
`
`as she lost
`
`all of her
`
`clients'
`
`contact
`
`information,
`
`and she will
`
`be unable
`
`to do so for
`
`an indefinite
`
`time
`
`in the future,
`
`her daily
`
`chores,
`
`duties,
`
`resulting
`
`in her great
`
`financial
`
`detriment
`
`and
`
`loss.
`
`68.
`
`69.
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`is strictly
`
`liable
`
`for Plaintiff's
`
`damages.
`
`Based
`
`on the foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is seeking
`
`a judgment
`
`in an amount
`
`to be
`
`determined
`
`at
`
`trial,
`
`but
`
`in all
`
`respects
`
`exceeding
`
`the jurisdictional
`
`minimums
`
`of
`
`this Court,
`
`compensatory,
`
`and
`
`punitive
`
`damages,
`
`injunctive
`
`relief,
`
`further
`
`sale
`
`declaratory
`
`relief,
`
`restraining
`
`of
`
`the Samsung
`
`Galaxy
`
`Note
`
`9 to the
`
`general
`
`public,
`
`and other
`
`appropriate
`
`legal
`
`and equitable
`
`relief.
`
`AS AND_F_OR
`
`A SECOND
`
`CAUSE
`
`OF ACTION
`
`70.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats,
`
`reiterates,
`
`reincorporates,
`
`and
`
`realleges
`
`the allegations
`
`contained
`
`in all
`
`preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`with
`
`the same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as if or as though
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`herein.
`
`71.
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`failed
`
`to provide
`
`adequate
`
`and
`
`sufficient
`
`warnings
`
`as to the
`
`and sufficient
`
`dangers
`
`and propensities
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone;
`
`in that
`
`it
`
`failed
`
`to provide
`
`adequate
`
`instructions
`
`and warnings
`
`as to the
`
`use and safe
`
`operation
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone;
`
`in that
`
`it
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`take
`
`adequate
`
`precautions
`
`and provide
`
`adequate
`
`and
`
`sufficient
`
`warnings
`
`to persons
`
`including
`
`Plaintiff
`
`herein,
`
`likely
`
`to use the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`in the manner
`
`in which
`
`Plaintiff
`
`was
`
`using
`
`the
`
`Samsung
`
`Galaxy
`
`Note
`
`9 at
`
`the time
`
`of
`
`the occurrence.
`
`12 of 22
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2018 12:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 713791/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2018
`
`72.
`
`As a result
`
`of
`
`the foregoing,
`
`on and prior
`
`to the time
`
`of
`
`the occurrence,
`
`the
`
`Subject
`
`Phone
`
`existed
`
`in an unreasonably
`
`dangerous,
`
`unreasonably
`
`defective,
`
`and
`
`unreasonably
`
`unsafe
`
`condition.
`
`73.
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung's
`
`failure
`
`to provide
`
`these
`
`adequate
`
`warnings
`
`and instructions
`
`was
`
`the
`
`direct
`
`and
`
`proximate
`
`result
`
`of Plaintiff's
`
`damages.
`
`74.
`
`As a direct
`
`and proximate
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the foregoing
`
`failure
`
`to provide
`
`adequate
`
`instructions
`
`and warnings,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has been
`
`damaged.
`
`75.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the foregoing,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`is strictly
`
`liable
`
`for Plaintiff's
`
`damages.
`
`76.
`
`As
`
`a direct
`
`and proximate
`
`result
`
`ofthe
`
`foregoing
`
`negligence
`
`of Defendant
`
`Samsung,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has suffered
`
`severe
`
`pain, mental
`
`anguish,
`
`humiliation,
`
`and embarrassment,
`
`and
`
`she will
`
`continue
`
`to suffer
`
`same
`
`for
`
`an indefinite
`
`period
`
`of
`
`time
`
`and that
`
`in the future,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has been
`
`unable
`
`to attend
`
`her daily
`
`chores,
`
`duties,
`
`and occupations,
`
`as she lost
`
`all of her
`
`clients'
`
`contact
`
`information,
`
`and
`
`she will
`
`be unable
`
`to do so for
`
`an indefmite
`
`time
`
`in the future,
`
`resulting
`
`in her great
`
`financial
`
`detriment
`
`and
`
`loss.
`
`77.
`
`Based
`
`on the foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is seeking
`
`a judgment
`
`in an amount
`
`to be
`
`determined
`
`at
`
`trial,
`
`but
`
`in all
`
`respects
`
`exceeding
`
`the jurisdictional
`
`minimums
`
`of
`
`this Court,
`
`declaratory
`
`relief,
`
`compensatory,
`
`and
`
`punitive
`
`damages,
`
`injunctive
`
`relief,
`
`restraining
`
`further
`
`sale
`
`of
`
`the Samsung
`
`Galaxy
`
`Note
`
`9 to the general
`
`public,
`
`and other
`
`appropriate
`
`legal
`
`and equitable
`
`relief.
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRD
`
`CAUSE
`
`OF ACTION
`
`78.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats,
`
`reiterates,
`
`reincorporates,
`
`and realleges
`
`the allegations
`
`contained
`
`in all preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as if or as though
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`herein.
`
`13 of 22
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2018 12:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 713791/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2018
`
`79.
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`is liable
`
`in tort
`
`for Plaintiff's
`
`injuries
`
`and damages
`
`as there
`
`were
`
`defects
`
`in the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`as the time
`
`of
`
`its design,
`
`manufacture,
`
`fabrication,
`
`delivery,
`
`assembly,
`
`construction,
`
`and sale
`
`at
`
`the
`
`time
`
`it was
`
`put
`
`into
`
`the stream
`
`of commerce,
`
`and said
`
`defects
`
`were
`
`substantial
`
`factors
`
`in bringing
`
`about
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`injuries
`
`and damages.
`
`80.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`could
`
`not
`
`of
`
`reasonable
`
`discovered
`
`the defects
`
`or
`
`percçive
`
`their
`
`danger.
`
`have,
`
`by exercise
`
`care,
`
`81.
`
`82.
`
`The Subject
`
`Phone
`
`was
`
`being
`
`used
`
`for
`
`the purposes
`
`for which
`
`it was
`
`intended.
`
`The Subject
`
`Phone
`
`was
`
`being
`
`used
`
`by Plaintiff,
`
`who was
`
`a member
`
`of
`
`the class
`
`of
`
`persons
`
`which
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`could
`
`reasonably
`
`have
`
`expected
`
`to have
`
`been
`
`using
`
`its cell
`
`phone
`
`devices,
`
`including
`
`the Samsung
`
`Galaxy
`
`Note
`
`9.
`
`the
`
`on and
`
`prior
`
`of
`
`83.
`
`As a result
`
`of
`
`foregoing,
`
`to the time
`
`the occurrence,
`
`the
`
`Subject
`
`Phone
`
`existed
`
`in an unreasonably
`
`dangerous,
`
`unreasonably
`
`defective,
`
`and
`
`unreasonably
`
`unsafe
`
`condition.
`
`84.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`is strictly
`
`liable
`
`for Plaintiff's
`
`injuries
`
`and damages.
`
`85.
`
`As a direct
`
`and proximate
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`negligence
`
`of Defendant
`
`Samsung,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has suffered
`
`severe
`
`pain, mental
`
`anguish,
`
`humiliation,
`
`and embarrassment,
`
`same
`
`for
`
`an indefinite
`
`time
`
`and she will
`
`continue
`
`to suffer
`
`period
`
`of
`
`in the future,
`
`and that
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has been
`
`unable
`
`to attend
`
`her daily
`
`chores,
`
`duties,
`
`and occupations,
`
`as she lost
`
`all of her
`
`clients'
`
`contact
`
`information,
`
`and
`
`she will
`
`be unable
`
`to do so for an indefinite
`
`time
`
`in the future,
`
`resulting
`
`in her great
`
`financial
`
`detriment
`
`and
`
`loss.
`
`86.
`
`Based
`
`on the foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is seeking
`
`a judgment
`
`in an amount
`
`to be
`
`determined
`
`at
`
`trial,
`
`but
`
`in all
`
`respects
`
`exceeding
`
`the jurisdictional
`
`minimums
`
`of
`
`this Court,
`
`14 of 22
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2018 12:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 713791/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2018
`
`declaratory
`
`relief,
`
`compensatory,
`
`and
`
`punitive
`
`damages,
`
`injunctive
`
`relief,
`
`restraining
`
`further
`
`sale
`
`of
`
`the Samsung
`
`Galaxy
`
`Note
`
`9 to the general
`
`public,
`
`and other
`
`appropriate
`
`legal
`
`and equitable
`
`relief.
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTH
`
`CAUSE
`
`OF ACTION
`
`87.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats,
`
`reiterates,
`
`reincorporates,
`
`and realleges
`
`the allegations
`
`contained
`
`in all preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as if or as though
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`herein.
`
`of
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`88.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`at
`
`the time
`
`of
`
`the sale
`
`by
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung,
`
`and/or
`
`its authorized
`
`representatives,
`
`agents,
`
`or servants,
`
`to Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung,
`
`either
`
`by
`
`itself
`
`or
`
`through
`
`authorized
`
`representatives,
`
`represented
`
`and
`
`warranted
`
`that
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`would
`
`be safe
`
`for
`
`the purpose
`
`for which
`
`it was
`
`intended
`
`and
`
`that
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`was
`
`of merchantable
`
`quality.
`
`not
`
`for
`
`the
`
`use for
`
`89.
`
`The Subject
`
`Phone
`
`was
`
`not
`
`of merchantable
`
`quality
`
`and was
`
`fit
`
`which
`
`it was
`
`intended
`
`when manufactured,
`
`sold,
`
`transferred,
`
`or placed
`
`into
`
`the stream
`
`of
`
`commerce
`
`by Defendant
`
`Samsung,
`
`either
`
`by
`
`itself
`
`or
`
`through
`
`authorized
`
`representatives,
`
`agents,
`
`and/or
`
`servants,
`
`to Plaintiff.
`
`90.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`is strictly
`
`liable
`
`for Plaintiff's
`
`injuries
`
`and damages.
`
`proximate
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`negligence
`
`of Defendant
`
`91.
`
`As a direct
`
`and
`
`foregoing
`
`Samsung,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has suffered
`
`severe
`
`pain, mental
`
`anguish,
`
`humiliation,
`
`and embarrassment,
`
`and
`
`she will
`
`continue
`
`to suffer
`
`same
`
`for
`
`an indefinite
`
`period
`
`of
`
`time
`
`in the future,
`
`and that
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has been
`
`unable
`
`to attend
`
`her daily
`
`chores,
`
`duties,
`
`and occupations,
`
`as she lost
`
`all of her
`
`clients'
`
`resulting
`
`contact
`
`information,
`
`and
`
`she will
`
`be unable
`
`to do so for
`
`an indefinite
`
`time
`
`in the future,
`
`in her great
`
`financial
`
`detriment
`
`and
`
`loss.
`
`15 of 22
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2018 12:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 713791/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2018
`
`92.
`
`Based
`
`on the foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is seeking
`
`a judgment
`
`in an amount
`
`to be
`
`determined
`
`at
`
`trial,
`
`but
`
`in all
`
`respects
`
`exceeding
`
`the jurisdictional
`
`minimums
`
`of
`
`this Court,
`
`declaratory
`
`relief,
`
`compensatory,
`
`and
`
`punitive
`
`damages,
`
`injunctive
`
`relief,
`
`restraining
`
`further
`
`sale
`
`of
`
`the Samsung
`
`Galaxy
`
`Note
`
`9 to the general
`
`public,
`
`and other
`
`appropriate
`
`legal
`
`and equitable
`
`relief.
`
`AS AND FOR A FIFTH
`
`CAUSE
`
`OF ACTION
`
`93.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats,
`
`reiterates,
`
`reincorporates,
`
`and realleges
`
`the
`
`allegations
`
`contained
`
`in all preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as if or as though
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`herein.
`
`94.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`at a time
`
`prior
`
`to September
`
`3, 2018,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung,
`
`either
`
`by
`
`itself
`
`or
`
`through
`
`its agents,
`
`servants,
`
`and/or
`
`representatives,
`
`sold
`
`to the
`
`general
`
`public,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`herein,
`
`Galaxy
`
`Note
`
`9,
`
`the Subject
`
`including
`
`the Samsung
`
`including
`
`Phone,
`
`upon
`
`being
`
`paid
`
`good
`
`valuable
`
`and adequate
`
`consideration
`
`for
`
`same.
`
`95.
`
`At
`
`the time
`
`of said
`
`sale
`
`and
`
`as part
`
`thereof,
`
`and as an inducement
`
`of purchase,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`expressly
`
`warranted
`
`to the general
`
`public,
`
`including
`
`Plaintiff
`
`herein,
`
`that
`
`the
`
`Samsung
`
`Galaxy
`
`Note
`
`9,
`
`including
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone,
`
`was
`
`designed,
`
`manufactured,
`
`assembled,
`
`and
`
`fabricated
`
`in a safe manner
`
`and was
`
`safe
`
`to operate.
`
`96.
`
`97.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`purchased
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`in reliance
`
`upon
`
`said warranties.
`
`Said warranties
`
`were
`
`untrue
`
`in that
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`started
`
`to smoke,
`
`caught
`
`on
`
`fire,
`
`and
`
`exploded,
`
`and that
`
`it was
`
`defective,
`
`dangerous,
`
`and unsafe,
`
`and that
`
`it malfunctioned
`
`during
`
`its normal
`
`operation
`
`of use.
`
`98.
`
`On or about
`
`September
`
`3, 2018,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`used
`
`the Subject
`
`Phone
`
`as intended
`
`and
`
`sustained
`
`injuries
`
`and damages.
`
`16 of 22
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 09/07/2018 12:17 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 713791/2018
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 09/07/2018
`
`99.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Defendant
`
`Samsung
`
`is liable
`
`to Plaintiff
`
`under
`
`the
`
`theories
`
`of breach
`
`of contract
`
`and/or
`
`breach
`
`express
`
`warranty.
`
`100.
`
`As a direct
`
`and proximate
`
`result
`
`ofthe
`
`foregoing
`
`negligence
`
`of Defendant
`
`Samsung,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`has suffered
`
`severe
`
`pain, mental
`
`anguish,
`
`humiliation,
`
`and embarrassment,
`
`and she will
`
`continue
`
`to suffer
`
`same
`
`for
`
`an indefinite
`
`period
`
`of
`
`time
`
`in the
`
`future,
`
`and that
`
`Plaintiff
`
`unable
`
`has been
`
`to attend
`
`her daily
`
`chores,
`
`duties,
`
`and occupations,
`
`as she lost
`
`all of her
`
`clients'
`
`contact
`
`information,
`
`and
`
`she will
`
`be unable
`
`to do so for
`
`an indefinite
`
`time
`
`in the future,
`
`resulting
`
`in her great
`
`financial
`
`detriment
`
`and
`
`loss.
`
`101.
`
`Based
`
`on the foregoing,
`
`Plaintiff
`
`is seeking
`
`a judgment
`
`in an amount
`
`to be
`
`determined
`
`at
`
`trial,
`
`but
`
`in all
`
`respects
`
`exceeding
`
`the jurisdictional
`
`minimums
`
`of
`
`this Court,
`
`relief,
`
`and
`
`punitive
`
`damages,
`
`injunctive
`
`relief,
`
`further
`
`sale
`
`declaratory
`
`compensatory,
`
`restraining
`
`of
`
`the Samsung
`
`Galaxy
`
`Note
`
`9 to the general
`
`public,
`
`and other
`
`appropriate
`
`legal
`
`and equitable
`
`relief.
`
`AS AND FOR A SIXTH
`
`CAUSE
`
`OF ACTION
`
`102.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`repeats,
`
`reiterates,
`
`reincorporates,
`
`and realleges
`
`the
`
`allegations
`
`contained
`
`in all preceding
`
`paragraphs
`
`with
`
`the same
`
`force
`
`and effect
`
`as if or as though
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`fort

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket