throbber
FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/10/2020 02:38 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 721351/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/10/2020
`
`OF THE
`COURT
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`OF QUEENS
`___...________---.....---------
`AND
`MANAGEMENT
`EROS
`MANAGEMENT
`PIONEER
`JOHN
`SHARMA,
`
`STATE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`-----------------X
`
`REALTY,
`AND
`
`LLC,
`REALTY,
`
`LLC,
`
`and
`
`INDEX
`
`NUMBER
`
`VERIFIED
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`-against-
`
`AC35
`
`HOTELPARTNERSLLC,
`
`-------
`
`----------------------------------------------------X
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`EROS MANAGEMENT
`
`AND
`
`REALTY,
`
`LLC
`
`MANAGEMENT
`
`AND
`
`REALTY,
`
`LLC
`
`("Pioneer"),
`
`and
`
`JOHN
`
`("EROS"),
`SHARMA
`
`PIONEER
`
`("Sharma")
`
`(collectively
`
`allege
`
`as for
`
`referred
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`to as "Plaintiffs"),
`
`by
`
`its
`
`attorneys,
`
`The
`
`Scher
`
`Law
`
`Firm,
`
`LLP,
`
`respectfully
`
`Verified
`
`Complaint
`
`as follows:
`
`L
`
`PARTIES,
`
`JURISDICTION
`
`AND VENUE
`
`The
`
`Plaintiff
`
`EROS MANAGEMENT
`
`LLC
`
`and
`
`1,
`
`AND REALTY,
`
`("EROS")
`
`was
`
`still
`
`is a domestic
`
`limited
`
`liability
`
`company
`
`with
`
`its
`
`principal
`
`place
`
`of business
`
`in the County
`
`of
`
`New York,
`
`State
`
`of New York.
`
`2.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiff
`
`PIONEER
`
`MANAGEMENT
`
`AND REALTY,
`
`LLC ("Pioneer")
`
`was
`
`and
`
`still
`
`is a domestic
`
`limited
`
`liability
`
`company
`
`with
`
`its principal
`
`place
`
`of business
`
`in the County
`
`of New York,
`
`State
`
`of New York.
`
`3.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiff
`
`JOHN
`
`SHARMA
`
`domiciled
`
`and
`
`resides
`
`in the County
`
`of Queens,
`
`and
`was
`("Sharma")
`of New York.1
`
`State
`
`still
`
`is a natural
`
`person
`
`who
`
`is
`
`EROS, Pioneer,
`
`and Shanna will
`
`collectively
`
`be referred
`
`to as "Plaintiffs".
`
`1 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/10/2020 02:38 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 721351/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/10/2020
`
`4.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`the
`
`Defendant
`
`AC35
`
`HOTEL
`
`PARTNERS
`
`LLC,
`
`("AC35")
`
`was
`
`and
`
`still
`
`is a domestic
`
`limited
`
`liability
`
`company,
`
`with
`
`its principal
`
`place
`
`of business
`
`in the County
`
`of New York,
`
`State
`
`of New York.
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`Jurisdiction
`
`of
`
`this Court
`
`is proper
`
`pursuant
`
`to CPLR
`
`§ 301.
`
`Venue
`
`in
`
`this
`
`Court
`
`is appropriate
`
`pursuant
`
`to CPLR
`
`§ 503(a),
`
`since
`
`Sharma's
`
`domicile
`
`and
`
`residence
`
`is located
`
`in the County
`
`of Queens.
`
`IL
`
`FACTS
`
`7.
`
`EROS
`
`is the owner
`
`of
`
`the
`
`real
`
`property
`
`located
`
`at 345 West
`
`35th
`
`Street,
`
`New York,
`
`New York
`
`("Real
`
`Property")
`
`and
`
`owns
`
`the TRYP
`
`by Wyndham
`
`New York
`
`City
`
`Times
`
`Square
`
`South
`
`hotel
`
`("TRYP
`
`Hotel"),
`
`which
`
`operates
`
`on the Real
`
`Property.
`
`8.
`
`As
`
`a result
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel's
`
`business
`
`has
`
`dropped
`
`between
`
`of COVID-19,
`
`98%
`
`and
`
`100%,
`
`depending
`
`upon
`
`the New York
`
`State
`
`regulations
`
`imposed
`
`the Governor's
`
`by
`
`Executive
`
`Orders
`
`and
`
`depending
`
`upon
`
`regulations
`
`placed
`
`upon
`
`hotels
`
`and
`
`gatherings
`
`by
`
`the Mayor
`
`of New
`
`York
`
`and
`
`the
`
`availability
`
`of guests.
`
`9.
`
`COVID-19
`
`has devasted
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel's
`
`business.
`
`10.
`
`The
`
`devastating
`
`effects
`
`of almost
`
`the
`
`complete
`
`shutdown
`
`of
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel
`
`from
`
`March
`
`7, 2020
`
`through
`
`today
`
`has made
`
`keeping
`
`any
`
`financial
`
`commitments
`
`impossible
`
`for
`
`the
`
`Plaintiffs.
`
`I 1.
`
`The
`
`effects
`
`of COVID-19
`
`can
`
`best
`
`be shown
`
`as it
`
`relates
`
`to July
`
`2020
`
`bookings
`
`at
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel.
`
`12.
`
`As
`
`July
`
`2020
`
`approached,
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel
`
`was
`
`reflecting
`
`what
`
`was
`
`going
`
`to be a
`
`ten
`
`percent
`
`(10%)
`
`occupancy
`
`rate.
`
`2
`
`2 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/10/2020 02:38 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 721351/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/10/2020
`
`13.
`
`However,
`
`in July
`
`2020,
`
`Governor
`
`Cuomo
`
`issued
`
`travelling
`
`warnings
`
`and quarantine
`
`regulations
`
`requiring
`
`people
`
`from
`
`out-of-State
`
`to quarantine
`
`for
`
`two
`
`weeks
`
`upon
`
`arrival
`
`into New
`
`York.
`
`14.
`
`This
`
`quarantine
`
`requirement
`
`also
`
`placed
`
`a burden
`
`on hotels,
`
`like
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel,
`
`to monitor
`
`its guests
`
`to ensure
`
`proper
`
`quarantining.
`
`15.
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel
`
`was
`
`required
`
`to create
`
`of all guests
`
`and
`
`contact
`
`tracers
`
`In fact,
`
`a log
`
`regularly
`
`contacted
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel
`
`to make
`
`sure
`
`any
`
`guests
`
`were
`
`properly
`
`quarantining
`
`16.
`
`Once
`
`the
`
`quarantine
`
`requirements
`
`were
`
`imposed,
`
`the
`
`TRYP
`
`Hotel's
`
`occupancy
`
`crashed
`
`to zero
`
`percent
`
`(0%)
`
`occupancy.
`
`17.
`
`18.
`
`In addition,
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel
`
`obtains
`
`a lot
`
`of business
`
`from
`
`international
`
`travelers.
`
`However,
`
`since
`
`international
`
`travel
`
`is essentially
`
`non-existent,
`
`but
`
`to the
`
`extent
`
`it
`
`had
`
`is on-going
`
`there
`
`are
`
`quarantine
`
`reañdates,
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel
`
`has
`
`not
`
`any
`
`international
`
`guests
`
`since
`
`essentially
`
`March
`
`2020.
`
`19.
`
`But AC35
`
`knows
`
`about
`
`the
`
`effects
`
`Hotel
`
`because
`
`its hotels,
`
`the Even,
`
`Marriot
`
`Courtyard
`
`the COVID-19
`on 30*
`
`pandemic
`
`has had
`
`on the TRYP
`
`Street,
`
`and
`
`the Hotel
`
`Shocard
`
`have
`
`all been
`
`shut
`
`down
`
`and
`
`are not
`
`accepting
`
`reservations.
`
`20.
`
`the Hotel
`
`Shocard's
`
`a hotel
`
`owned
`
`the owners
`
`of AC35
`
`In fact,
`
`website,
`
`partially
`
`by
`
`states
`
`that
`
`they
`
`"look
`
`forward
`
`to welcoming
`
`you
`
`back
`
`to our
`
`hotel
`
`on May
`
`15,
`
`202l!"
`
`Exhibit
`
`A,
`
`a copy
`
`of
`
`the Hotel
`
`Shocard's
`
`website.
`
`21.
`
`22.
`
`out
`
`in Manhattan.
`
`What
`
`happeñêd
`
`to the TRYP
`
`Hotel
`
`as a result
`
`of COVID-19
`
`has been
`
`devastating.
`
`If
`
`the
`
`pandemic
`
`effects
`
`were
`
`not
`
`bad
`
`enough,
`
`in the Summer
`
`of
`
`2020,
`
`riots
`
`broke
`
`3
`
`3 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/10/2020 02:38 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 721351/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/10/2020
`
`23.
`
`8*
`
`between
`
`Since
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel
`
`sits
`
`next
`
`to the Midtown
`
`South
`
`Police
`
`Precinct
`
`on 35*
`
`Street,
`
`9*
`
`and
`
`Avenues,
`
`the
`
`street
`
`was
`
`barricaded
`
`for
`
`approximately
`
`two months
`
`because
`
`the
`
`police
`
`precinct
`
`received
`
`bomb
`
`threats.
`
`24.
`
`While
`
`it
`
`is
`
`unclear
`
`how
`
`much
`
`effect
`
`the
`
`street
`
`closing
`
`had
`
`on
`
`business
`
`since
`
`business
`
`did
`
`not
`
`even
`
`exist
`
`in the Summer
`
`of
`
`2020
`
`because
`
`of
`
`the
`
`travel
`
`restrictions
`
`and
`
`really
`
`quarantine
`
`orders
`
`imposed
`
`the New York
`
`by
`
`State Governor,
`
`the closing
`
`was
`
`just
`
`another
`
`problem
`
`faced
`
`by
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel
`
`that makes
`
`it
`
`impossible
`
`for
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`to live
`
`up to their
`
`contractual
`
`obligation.
`
`25.
`
`Before
`
`the COVID-19
`
`pandemic
`
`was
`
`ever
`
`known
`
`or expected,
`
`on or about
`
`October
`
`31,
`
`2019,
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`entered
`
`into
`
`a Settlement
`
`Agreement
`
`and Release
`
`and
`
`a Purchase
`
`and Sale
`
`Agreement
`
`with
`
`AC35.
`
`See, Exhibit
`
`B,
`
`a copy
`
`of
`
`the Settlement
`
`Agreemcat.
`
`See,
`
`Exhibit
`
`C,
`
`a
`
`of
`
`the Purchase
`
`and Sale
`
`Agreement.
`
`copy
`
`26.
`
`The
`
`Settlement
`
`Agreement
`
`and
`
`the Purchase
`
`and Sale Agreement
`
`and
`
`the Purchase
`
`and
`
`Sale
`
`Agreement
`
`required
`
`Pioneer
`
`to purchase
`
`AC35's
`
`32.5%
`
`membership
`
`interest
`
`in EROS
`
`for
`
`the
`
`total
`
`sum of $8,150,000.00.
`
`27.
`
`The
`
`payment
`
`schedule
`
`in
`
`the
`
`Settlement
`
`Agreement
`
`required
`
`Pioneer
`
`to
`
`pay
`
`$1,000,000
`
`on
`
`or
`
`before
`
`November
`
`1, 2019;
`
`$337,593.13
`
`on
`
`or
`
`before
`
`December
`
`15,
`
`2019;
`
`$500,000
`
`on
`
`or before
`
`March
`
`15, 2020;
`
`$500,000
`
`on or before
`
`July
`
`15, 2020;
`
`and
`
`$6,150,000
`
`on
`
`November
`
`or before
`
`15, 2020.
`
`See, Exhibit
`
`B, at ¶ 2. See, Exhibit
`
`C,
`
`at ¶ l(b).
`
`28.
`
`Once
`
`the
`
`$1,000,000
`
`was
`
`paid
`
`on November
`
`1, 2019,
`
`AC35
`
`no longer
`
`owned
`
`any
`
`membership
`
`interests
`
`in EROS.
`
`See, Exhibit
`
`B, at ¶ 2.
`
`29.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`timely
`
`made
`
`the
`
`payments
`
`for
`
`November
`
`2019,
`
`December
`
`2019,
`
`March
`
`2020,
`
`and
`
`July
`
`2020.
`
`30.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`however,
`
`cannot
`
`make
`
`the
`
`November
`
`15,
`
`2020
`
`payment
`
`in
`
`the
`
`amount
`
`of $6,150,000.00
`
`because
`
`COVID-19
`
`closed
`
`down
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel.
`
`4
`
`4 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/10/2020 02:38 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 721351/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/10/2020
`
`31.
`
`When
`
`the
`
`deal
`
`was
`
`struck
`
`in October
`
`2019,
`
`AC35
`
`knew
`
`that
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`needed
`
`to borrow
`
`the money
`
`for
`
`the November
`
`15, 2020
`
`payment.
`
`32.
`
`AC35
`
`knew
`
`that
`
`the
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`did
`
`not
`
`have
`
`the
`
`cash
`
`to make
`
`a $6.15
`
`million
`
`payment
`
`in November
`
`2020.
`
`33.
`
`Despite
`
`have
`
`conversations
`
`with
`
`EROS'
`
`lender
`
`beginning
`
`in
`
`February
`
`2020
`
`to
`
`structure
`
`the
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`to make
`
`the November
`
`2020
`
`as a
`
`a borrowing
`
`enabling
`
`15,
`
`payment,
`
`consequence
`
`of
`
`the COVID-19
`
`pandemic,
`
`all
`
`the
`
`conversations
`
`ceased
`
`and
`
`there
`
`is no
`
`likelihood
`
`that
`
`the
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`will
`
`be
`
`able
`
`to
`
`borrow
`
`the money
`
`to
`
`pay
`
`AC35
`
`for
`
`the November
`
`15,
`
`2020
`
`payment
`
`of $6.15
`
`million.
`
`34.
`
`As
`
`a result
`
`of COVID-19,
`
`the mortgage
`
`and
`
`financing
`
`market
`
`has
`
`dried
`
`up.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`own
`
`a hotel
`
`in Manhattan
`
`with
`
`no
`
`"light
`
`at
`
`the
`
`of
`
`tunnel"
`
`35.
`
`end
`
`the
`
`when
`
`the
`
`operations
`
`of
`
`the
`
`hotel
`
`will
`
`get
`
`back
`
`to normal.
`
`36.
`
`There
`
`is
`
`simply
`
`no
`
`one
`
`lending
`
`money
`
`to
`
`the
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`because
`
`the
`
`business
`
`prospects
`
`are
`
`so speculative.
`
`37.
`
`Despite
`
`every
`
`effort
`
`by
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`it has become
`
`clear
`
`that
`
`it will
`
`be impossible
`
`for
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`to make
`
`the
`
`$6.15
`
`million
`
`payment
`
`on November
`
`15, 2020.
`
`38.
`
`As a result
`
`of
`
`the COVID-19
`
`there
`
`has been
`
`a frustration
`
`with
`
`respect
`
`to the Settlement
`
`Agreement.
`
`pandemic,
`
`of purpose
`
`39.
`
`40.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`are not
`
`trying
`
`to evade
`
`or never
`
`pay AC35
`
`the
`
`$6.15
`
`million.
`
`The Plaintiffs
`
`just
`
`need
`
`time
`
`to pay
`
`and request
`
`that
`
`the Court
`
`delay
`
`the
`
`enforcement
`
`of
`
`the Settlement
`
`Agreement
`
`and
`
`its default
`
`provisions,
`
`including
`
`the:
`
`(1) Promissory
`
`Note
`
`issued
`
`by
`
`the
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`(see,
`
`Exhibit
`
`D);
`
`and
`
`(2) Confessions
`
`of
`
`Judgment
`
`executed
`
`by
`
`the
`
`Plaintiffs.
`
`See, Exhibit
`
`E.
`
`5
`
`5 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/10/2020 02:38 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 721351/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/10/2020
`
`41.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`are
`
`not
`
`asking
`
`the Court
`
`to
`
`void
`
`the Settlement
`
`Agreement
`
`or
`
`the
`
`Purchase
`
`and Sale
`
`Agreement,
`
`only
`
`to delay
`
`the
`
`enforcement
`
`of
`
`the
`
`default
`
`provisions
`
`to enable
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`to make
`
`payment,
`
`either
`
`by a payment
`
`schedule
`
`or delaying
`
`the
`
`lump
`
`sum payment
`
`of
`
`$6.15
`
`million
`
`until
`
`the COVID-pañdemic's
`
`effects
`
`on
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel's
`
`business
`
`becomes
`
`clearer.
`
`HL
`
`CAUSES
`
`OF ACTION
`
`AS AND FOR A FIRST
`
`THE DEFENDANT
`
`FOR
`
`OF ACTION
`CAUSE
`DECLARATORY
`
`AGAINST
`JUDGMENT
`
`42.
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`repeat,
`
`reiterate
`
`and
`
`reallege
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`paragraphs
`
`üürobered
`
`"1"
`
`forth
`
`herein.
`
`through
`
`"41",
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as though
`
`more
`
`fully
`
`in
`
`set
`
`40.
`
`On November
`
`15, 2020,
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`are required
`
`to make
`
`a payment
`
`to AC35
`
`in
`
`the
`
`amount
`
`of
`
`$6.15
`
`million
`
`under
`
`the
`
`terms
`
`of
`
`the Settlement
`
`Agreement
`
`and
`
`the Purchase
`
`and
`
`Sale
`
`Agreement.
`
`See, Exhibit
`
`B, at 12.d.
`
`See, Exhibit
`
`C,
`
`at ¶ 1.(b)5..
`
`41.
`
`The
`
`doctrine
`
`of
`
`impossibility
`
`excuses
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`from making
`
`the November
`
`15,
`
`2020
`
`paymêñt
`
`because
`
`the COVID-19
`
`pandemic,
`
`the economic
`
`effects
`
`as a result
`
`of
`
`the pandemic,
`
`and
`
`the New York
`
`State
`
`and New York
`
`City
`
`regulations
`
`destroyed
`
`the
`
`economic
`
`viability
`
`of
`
`the
`
`TRYP
`
`Hotel
`
`and made
`
`it
`
`impossible
`
`for
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`to obtain
`
`financing
`
`to fund
`
`the November
`
`15, 2020
`
`payment.
`
`the means
`
`of
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`42.
`
`The
`
`COVID-19
`
`pandemic
`
`destroyed
`
`the
`
`performance
`
`objectively
`
`impossible.
`
`43.
`
`The COVID-19
`
`pandemic,
`
`an act of God,
`
`was
`
`an unanticipated
`
`event
`
`that
`
`could
`
`not
`
`have
`
`been
`
`foreseen
`
`or
`
`guarded
`
`against
`
`in
`
`the
`
`Settlement
`
`Agreement
`
`or
`
`the
`
`Purchase
`
`and
`
`Sale
`
`Agreement.
`
`44.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`performance
`
`is
`
`excused
`
`because
`
`the
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`performance
`
`is
`
`rendered
`
`impossible
`
`by
`
`intervening,
`
`unforeseen
`
`governmental
`
`activities.
`
`6
`
`6 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/10/2020 02:38 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 721351/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/10/2020
`
`45.
`
`The
`
`intervening.
`
`unforeseen
`
`governmental
`
`activities
`
`were
`
`the New York
`
`State
`
`Governor's
`
`Executive
`
`Orders
`
`limited
`
`the number
`
`of people
`
`in a given
`
`space.
`
`requiring
`
`out-of-State
`
`visitors
`
`to quarantine
`
`for
`
`fourteen
`
`days.
`
`and the New York
`
`City Mayor's
`
`restrictions,
`
`including
`
`but
`
`not
`
`limited
`
`to closing
`
`down
`
`West
`
`35*
`
`Street
`
`to protect
`
`the TRY P Hotel's
`
`neighbor,
`
`the Midtown
`
`South
`
`Police
`
`Precinct.
`
`46.
`
`There
`
`can
`
`be no dispute
`
`that
`
`on October
`
`31,
`
`2019
`
`when
`
`the Settlement
`
`Agreement
`
`an
`
`that
`
`not
`
`was
`
`executed,
`
`the COVID-19
`
`pandemic
`
`was
`
`unanticipated
`
`event
`
`could
`
`have
`
`been
`
`foreseen
`
`or guarded
`
`against
`
`in the Settlement
`
`Agreement.
`
`47.
`
`48.
`
`There
`
`can
`
`be no dispute
`
`that
`
`the COVID-19
`
`pandemic
`
`was
`
`an act of God.
`
`There
`
`can
`
`be
`
`no
`
`dispute
`
`that
`
`the Governor's
`
`Executive
`
`Orders
`
`and
`
`the Mayor's
`
`restrictions
`
`placed
`
`upon
`
`businesses
`
`and
`
`gatherings
`
`beginning
`
`in March
`
`2020
`
`were
`
`acts
`
`of
`
`law that
`
`made
`
`performance
`
`of
`
`the
`
`Settlement
`
`Agreement
`
`impossible
`
`because
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel
`
`was
`
`down
`
`by
`
`orders
`
`of
`
`the Governor
`
`and
`
`the Mayor
`
`and when
`
`the
`
`restrictions
`
`were
`
`partially
`
`lifted,
`
`the
`
`business
`
`of
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel
`
`has
`
`remained
`
`weak
`
`and
`
`to some
`
`extent
`
`non-existent.
`
`shut
`
`49.
`
`The
`
`government
`
`actions
`
`taken
`
`by
`
`the New York
`
`State Governor
`
`and the New York
`
`City Mayor
`
`as a result
`
`of
`
`the COVID-19
`
`pandemic
`
`were
`
`not
`
`foreseeable.
`
`50.
`
`AC35
`
`knew
`
`that
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`needed
`
`to obtain
`
`financing
`
`and
`
`borrowing
`
`to make
`
`the November
`
`15, 2020
`
`payment.
`
`51.
`
`that
`
`needed
`
`In February,
`
`2020,
`
`knowing
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`to obtain
`
`financing
`
`to make
`
`the November
`
`15,
`
`2020
`
`payment,
`
`the
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`began
`
`the
`
`process
`
`of
`
`seeking
`
`borrowing
`
`from
`
`EROS's
`
`current
`
`lender
`
`to obtain
`
`additional
`
`cash
`
`to fund
`
`the November
`
`15, 2020
`
`payment.
`
`52.
`
`In February
`
`2020,
`
`the
`
`Plaintiff
`
`had
`
`extensive
`
`conversations
`
`with
`
`EROS's
`
`lender
`
`and
`
`had
`
`actual
`
`began
`
`the
`
`application
`
`process
`
`to obtain
`
`the
`
`funding
`
`to pay
`
`for
`
`the Novcmber
`
`15,
`
`2020
`
`payment.
`
`7
`
`7 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/10/2020 02:38 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 721351/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/10/2020
`
`53.
`
`However,
`
`once
`
`the March
`
`20,
`
`2020
`
`shut
`
`down
`
`of
`
`the New York
`
`economy
`
`occurred,
`
`all
`
`conversations
`
`with
`
`the
`
`lender
`
`ceased,
`
`the loan was
`
`transferred
`
`to a new loan
`
`servicer,
`
`and EROS
`
`began
`
`to be in technical
`
`default
`
`of
`
`the
`
`loan
`
`as a result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`lack
`
`of business
`
`at
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel.
`
`54.
`
`Through
`
`the months
`
`of March,
`
`April,
`
`May,
`
`June,
`
`July,
`
`August,
`
`September,
`
`October,
`
`and November
`
`2020,
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`have
`
`been
`
`working
`
`tirelessly
`
`to obtain
`
`the
`
`financing
`
`the
`
`November
`
`15, 2020
`
`payment
`
`in the
`
`amount
`
`of $6.15
`
`million.
`
`to pay
`
`55.
`
`Despite
`
`all
`
`efforts
`
`made
`
`by
`
`the
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`as a consequence
`
`of
`
`the COVID-19
`
`pandemic,
`
`all
`
`funding
`
`sources
`
`have
`
`dried
`
`up and
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`have
`
`been
`
`unable
`
`to obtain
`
`financing
`
`to fund
`
`the November
`
`15, 2020
`
`payment
`
`in the
`
`amount
`
`of $6.15
`
`million.
`
`56.
`
`The COVID-19
`
`pandemic
`
`along
`
`with
`
`the State
`
`and City
`
`governments'
`
`restrictions
`
`and
`
`regulations
`
`caused
`
`a highly
`
`significant
`
`downturn
`
`in
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel's
`
`business,
`
`which
`
`has
`
`made
`
`borrowing
`
`objectively
`
`impossible.
`
`57.
`
`Therefore,
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`demand
`
`a declaratory
`
`judgment
`
`order
`
`declaring
`
`that
`
`the
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`perfonnance,
`
`i.e.. making
`
`the November
`
`15, 2020
`
`payment
`
`to AC35
`
`in the
`
`amount
`
`of
`
`|
`
`$6.15
`
`million
`
`is excused
`
`because
`
`of
`
`the
`
`doctrine
`
`of
`
`impossibility.
`
`AS AND FOR A SECOND
`
`OF ACTION
`CAUSE
`DECLARATORY
`
`AGAINST
`JUDGMENT
`
`THE DEFENDANT
`
`FOR
`
`58.
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`repeat,
`
`reiterate
`
`and
`
`reallege
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`in
`
`paragraphs
`
`numbered
`
`"1"
`
`through
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as though
`
`forth
`
`herein.
`
`"57",
`
`more
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`59.
`
`The
`
`doctrine
`
`of
`
`frustrated
`
`purpose
`
`requires
`
`that
`
`the purpose
`
`must
`
`be so completely
`
`the
`
`basis
`
`of
`
`the
`
`contract
`
`that,
`
`as both
`
`parties
`
`understood,
`
`without
`
`it,
`
`the
`
`transaction
`
`would
`
`have
`
`made
`
`little
`
`sense.
`
`60.
`
`The
`
`doctrine
`
`of
`
`frustrated
`
`purpose
`
`requires
`
`that
`
`the event
`
`that
`
`causes
`
`the
`
`fi·ustration
`
`of purpose
`
`was
`
`not
`
`foreseeable
`
`and
`
`provision
`
`could
`
`not
`
`have
`
`been made
`
`for
`
`its occurrence.
`
`8
`
`8 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/10/2020 02:38 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 721351/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/10/2020
`
`61.
`
`The
`
`economic
`
`effects
`
`of
`
`the COVID-19
`
`pandemic,
`
`which
`
`resulted
`
`in the New York
`
`State
`
`Governor's
`
`and New York
`
`City
`
`Mayor's
`
`Executive
`
`Orders,
`
`regulations,
`
`and
`
`restricting
`
`the
`
`TRYP
`
`Hotel's
`
`business
`
`strongly
`
`adversely
`
`impacted
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel's
`
`business.
`
`62.
`
`COVID-19
`
`and
`
`its
`
`effects
`
`on
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel's
`
`business
`
`were
`
`not
`
`foreseeable
`
`on
`
`2019
`
`when
`
`the
`
`Settlement
`
`Agreement
`
`and
`
`the
`
`Purchase
`
`and
`
`Sale
`
`October
`
`31,
`
`executed.
`
`Agreement
`
`was
`
`63.
`
`There
`
`was
`
`no way
`
`for
`
`the
`
`parties
`
`to
`
`the
`
`Settlement
`
`Agreement
`
`to
`
`have
`
`made
`
`provision
`
`for
`
`a pandemic
`
`and
`
`the
`
`subsequent
`
`effects
`
`on the TRYP
`
`Hotel's
`
`business.
`
`64.
`
`AC35
`
`knew
`
`that
`
`in order
`
`for
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`to make
`
`the November
`
`15, 2020
`
`payment
`
`under
`
`the Settlement
`
`Agreement,
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`had
`
`to borrow
`
`money
`
`from
`
`a lender
`
`because
`
`the
`
`not
`
`$6.15
`
`million
`
`in cash.
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`did
`
`have
`
`65.
`
`As
`
`a result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`COVID-19
`
`pandemic
`
`and
`
`the
`
`effects
`
`the New
`
`York
`
`State
`
`Governor's
`
`and New York
`
`City
`
`Mayor's
`
`regulations
`
`and
`
`restrictions
`
`had
`
`upon
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel's
`
`business,
`
`the mortgaging
`
`and
`
`lending
`
`market
`
`has
`
`completely
`
`dried
`
`up.
`
`66.
`
`As
`
`a consequence
`
`of
`
`the
`
`lack
`
`of
`
`a borrowing
`
`market,
`
`the
`
`complete
`
`basis
`
`of
`
`the
`
`the November
`
`payment
`
`million
`
`has
`
`been
`
`Settlement
`
`Agreement,i.e.,
`
`15, 2020
`
`of $6.15
`
`frustrated
`
`by
`
`the COVID-19
`
`pandemic
`
`and
`
`its effect
`
`on the TRYP
`
`Hotel's
`
`business.
`
`67.
`
`68.
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`Without
`
`the
`
`lump
`
`sum payment
`
`of $6.15
`
`million,
`
`the transaction
`
`made
`
`little
`
`sense.
`
`Therefore,
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`demand
`
`a declaratory
`
`judgment
`
`order
`
`declaring
`
`that
`
`the
`
`performance,
`
`i.e., making
`
`the November
`
`15, 2020
`
`payment
`
`to AC35
`
`in the
`
`amount
`
`of
`
`$6.15
`
`million
`
`is excused
`
`because
`
`of
`
`the
`
`doctrine
`
`of
`
`frustrated
`
`purpose.
`
`9 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/10/2020 02:38 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 721351/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/10/2020
`
`AS AND FOR A THIRD
`
`OF ACTION
`CAUSE
`PROMISSORY
`
`AGAINST
`ESTOPPEL
`
`THE DE FENDANT
`
`FOR
`
`69.
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`repeat,
`
`reiterate
`
`and
`
`reallege
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`paragraphs
`
`numbered
`
`"1"
`
`forth
`
`herein.
`
`through
`
`"68",
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as though
`
`more
`
`fully
`
`in
`
`set
`
`70.
`
`The
`
`Settlement
`
`Agreement
`
`and
`
`the
`
`Purchase
`
`and
`
`Sale
`
`Agreement
`
`required
`
`the
`
`as
`
`follows:
`
`$1,000,000
`
`on
`
`or
`
`before
`
`November
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`to make
`
`payments
`
`(1)
`
`1, 2019;
`
`$500,000
`
`on
`
`or
`
`before
`
`March
`
`15,
`
`2020;
`
`(3)
`
`$500,000
`
`on
`
`or
`
`before
`
`July
`
`15,
`
`2020;
`
`and
`
`$6,150,000
`
`on or before
`
`November
`
`15, 2020.
`
`See, Exhibit
`
`B, at ¶ 2. See, Exhibit
`
`C, at 1 2.
`
`(2)
`
`(4)
`
`71.
`
`72.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`made
`
`the November
`
`payment
`
`on time.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`made
`
`the March
`
`payment
`
`on
`
`time,
`
`despite
`
`the
`
`fact
`
`that
`
`it was
`
`due
`
`of
`
`pandemic
`
`and
`
`after
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel
`
`right
`
`at
`
`the
`
`beginning
`
`the COVID-19
`
`was
`
`closed
`
`down
`
`by
`
`the New York
`
`State Governor's
`
`Executive
`
`Order.
`
`See, Exhibit
`
`F, a copy
`
`of Governor
`
`Cuomo's
`
`March
`
`20,
`
`2020
`
`Executive
`
`Order.
`
`73.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`made
`
`the
`
`July
`
`payment
`
`on time,
`
`despite
`
`it being
`
`paid
`
`in the midst
`
`of
`
`COVID-19.
`
`74.
`
`75.
`
`The TRYP
`
`Hotel
`
`was
`
`closed
`
`down
`
`in July
`
`2020.
`
`But
`
`it was made
`
`under
`
`the
`
`assumption
`
`and
`
`based
`
`upon
`
`promises
`
`made
`
`by AC35
`
`be re-negotiated.
`
`that
`
`the November
`
`2020
`
`payment
`
`would
`
`76.
`
`In
`
`conversations
`
`and
`
`negotiations
`
`over
`
`the
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`attempts
`
`to
`
`postpose
`
`and
`
`extend
`
`or pay
`
`out
`
`the
`
`July
`
`payment,
`
`AC35
`
`promised
`
`that
`
`if
`
`the
`
`July
`
`payment
`
`was made,
`
`AC35
`
`would
`
`work
`
`with
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`to extend
`
`and modify
`
`the November
`
`2020
`
`payment.
`
`See, Exhibit
`
`G,
`
`copies
`
`of emails
`
`relating
`
`to the July
`
`2020
`
`payment
`
`and promises
`
`to negotiate
`
`over
`
`the November
`
`2020
`
`payment.
`
`l o
`
`10 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/10/2020 02:38 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 721351/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/10/2020
`
`77.
`
`Now that
`
`the November
`
`2020
`
`payment
`
`is due, AC35
`
`has not
`
`acted
`
`in good
`
`faith
`
`in
`
`negotiating
`
`a reasonable
`
`deal
`
`to avert
`
`a default
`
`under
`
`the
`
`terms
`
`of
`
`the Settlement
`
`Agreement.
`
`78.
`
`AC35
`
`has
`
`demanded
`
`financial
`
`records,
`
`an exorbitant
`
`down
`
`payment
`
`and monthly
`
`payments
`
`while
`
`the
`
`TRYP
`
`Hotel's
`
`business
`
`struggles
`
`under
`
`the
`
`weight
`
`of
`
`the
`
`COVID-19
`
`pandemic.
`
`79.
`
`The
`
`doctrine
`
`estoppel
`
`the Court
`
`from
`
`holding
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`in default
`
`because
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`relied
`
`upon
`
`AC35's
`
`promises
`
`and made
`
`of promissory
`
`should
`
`be imposed
`
`by
`
`to estop
`
`AC35
`
`the
`
`July
`
`2020
`
`payment.
`
`80.
`
`There
`
`was
`
`a clear
`
`and
`
`unambiguous
`
`promise
`
`by AC35
`
`that
`
`if
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`made
`
`the July
`
`2019
`
`payment
`
`in full
`
`timely,
`
`then AC35
`
`would
`
`negotiate
`
`an extension
`
`of deadline
`
`to make
`
`the payment.
`
`See, Exhibit
`
`G.
`
`81.
`
`upon
`
`this
`
`the
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`made
`
`the
`
`Relying
`
`promise,
`
`July
`
`2020
`
`payment
`
`of
`
`$500.000.00
`
`timely.
`
`82.
`
`83.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`reliance
`
`upon
`
`AC35's
`
`promise
`
`was
`
`foreseeable
`
`by AC35.
`
`In essence,
`
`AC35
`
`induced
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`to make
`
`the
`
`July
`
`2020
`
`payment
`
`with
`
`the
`
`promise
`
`that
`
`they
`
`would
`
`negotiate
`
`an extension
`
`of
`
`the November
`
`2020
`
`payment.
`
`84.
`
`85.
`
`However,
`
`AC35
`
`has not
`
`acted
`
`in good
`
`faith.
`
`AC35
`
`has made
`
`unreasonable
`
`demands
`
`like
`
`financial
`
`regarding
`
`the
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`financial
`
`condition
`
`as
`
`a pre-condition
`
`to
`
`the
`
`discussion
`
`regarding
`
`an
`
`extension
`
`of
`
`the November
`
`2020
`
`deadline.
`
`statements
`
`and
`
`infonnation
`
`86.
`
`AC35
`
`has made
`
`unreasonable
`
`down
`
`payment
`
`demands
`
`and
`
`payment
`
`terms
`
`that
`
`it
`
`knows
`
`the
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`cannot
`
`afford
`
`and
`
`cannot
`
`agree
`
`to
`
`under
`
`the
`
`current
`
`economic
`
`struggles
`
`effecting
`
`the TRYP
`
`Hotel
`
`during
`
`COVID-19.
`
`L I
`
`11 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/10/2020 02:38 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 721351/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/10/2020
`
`87.
`
`All
`
`of
`
`these
`
`demands
`
`is not
`
`acting
`
`in good
`
`faith.
`
`but
`
`backing
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`into
`
`a
`
`corner
`
`without
`
`a way
`
`out.
`
`88.
`
`As
`
`a result
`
`of AC35's
`
`promise
`
`and
`
`the
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`reasonable
`
`reliance
`
`upon
`
`the
`
`promise,
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`will
`
`be injured
`
`if AC35
`
`does
`
`not
`
`negotiate
`
`in good
`
`faith
`
`in negotiating
`
`an
`
`extension
`
`of
`
`the November
`
`15, 2020
`
`deadline.
`
`89.
`
`and
`
`This
`
`injury
`
`will
`
`be devastating
`
`because
`
`it will
`
`result
`
`in a judgment
`
`enforcement
`
`proceedings
`
`despite
`
`a promise
`
`not
`
`to take
`
`on these
`
`undertakings
`
`if
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`paid
`
`the July
`
`2020
`
`payment.
`
`90.
`
`Therefore,
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`demand
`
`judgment
`
`against
`
`in the
`
`amount
`
`to be determined
`
`at
`
`trial,
`
`but
`
`in no event
`
`less
`
`than
`
`FIVE
`
`DOLLARS
`
`($500,000.00).
`
`promissory
`THOUSAND
`HUNDRED
`
`AC35
`
`for
`
`estoppel
`
`AS AND FOR A FOURTH
`CAUSE
`OF THE COVENANT
`BREACH
`
`OF ACTION
`AGAINST
`OF GOOD FAITH
`
`THE DEFENDANT
`AND FAIR
`DEALING
`
`FOR
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`reiterate
`
`reallege
`
`91.
`
`repeat,
`
`and
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`paragraphs
`
`numbered
`
`"l"
`
`forth
`
`herein.
`
`through
`
`"90",
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`as though
`
`more
`
`fully
`
`in
`
`set
`
`92.
`
`93.
`
`AC35
`
`has
`
`not
`
`acted
`
`in good
`
`faith
`
`in its dealings
`
`with
`
`the Plaintiffs.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`have
`
`made
`
`every
`
`payment
`
`due
`
`and
`
`owing
`
`under
`
`the
`
`Settlement
`
`Agreement
`
`The
`
`and the Purchase
`
`and Sale Agreement.
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`made
`
`payments
`
`at
`
`the beginning
`
`of COVID-19
`
`in March
`
`2020
`
`and
`
`at
`
`the height
`
`of COVID-19
`
`in July
`
`2020.
`
`94.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`have
`
`acted
`
`in good
`
`faith
`
`since
`
`the October
`
`31,
`
`2019
`
`contracts
`
`were
`
`executed.
`
`95.
`
`AC35
`
`has
`
`promised
`
`to
`
`extend
`
`the
`
`November
`
`2020
`
`payment
`
`if
`
`the
`
`July
`
`2019
`
`payment
`
`was made
`
`timely
`
`and
`
`in full.
`
`12
`
`12 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/10/2020 02:38 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 721351/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/10/2020
`
`96.
`
`Now,
`
`when
`
`it
`
`comes
`
`time
`
`to negotiate
`
`the November
`
`2020
`
`extension,
`
`AC35
`
`has
`
`made
`
`unreasonable
`
`demands
`
`for
`
`financial
`
`disclosure
`
`and
`
`financial
`
`documents
`
`before
`
`addressing
`
`offer
`
`to extend
`
`the November
`
`2020
`
`payment.
`
`97.
`
`AC35
`
`has demanded
`
`that
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`make
`
`a large
`
`lump
`
`sum payment
`
`to obtain
`
`a
`
`new payment
`
`schedule
`
`in amounts
`
`that
`
`AC35
`
`knows
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`cannot
`
`meet.
`
`98.
`
`AC35
`
`threatened
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`with
`
`immediate
`
`default
`
`if payment
`
`was
`
`not made,
`
`of
`
`of
`
`while
`
`at
`
`the
`
`same
`
`time
`
`offering
`
`condolences
`
`for
`
`the
`
`loss
`
`one
`
`the members
`
`of EROS.
`
`Sce.
`
`Exhibit
`
`H,
`
`a copy
`
`of
`
`the
`
`July
`
`1, 2020
`
`email.
`
`99.
`
`AC35
`
`has
`
`not
`
`acted
`
`in
`
`good
`
`faith
`
`despite
`
`the
`
`Plaintiffs'
`
`good
`
`faith
`
`actions
`
`(by
`
`making
`
`every
`
`payment
`
`timely
`
`under
`
`the
`
`Settlement
`
`Agreement
`
`and
`
`the
`
`Purchase
`
`and
`
`Sale
`
`Agreement)
`
`and
`
`by making
`
`offers
`
`to AC35
`
`to extend
`
`the November
`
`2020
`
`payment.
`
`for
`
`an extension
`
`of
`
`100.
`
`AC35's
`
`bad
`
`faith
`
`has
`
`hindered
`
`any
`
`negotiation
`
`the November
`
`2020
`
`payment.
`
`101.
`
`Accordingly,
`
`the
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`demand
`
`judgment
`
`against
`
`AC35
`
`for
`
`breach
`
`of
`
`the
`
`covenant
`
`of good
`
`faith
`
`than
`
`FIVE
`
`HUNDRED
`
`and
`
`fair
`
`dealing
`THOUSAND
`
`in the
`
`amount
`
`to be determined
`
`at
`
`trial,
`
`but
`
`in no event
`
`less
`
`DOLLARS
`
`($500,000.00).
`
`OF ACTION
`AS AND FOR A FIFTH
`CAUSE
`FOR A PERMANENT
`
`AGAINST
`INJUNCTION
`
`ALL
`
`DEFENDANTS
`
`102.
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`repeat,
`
`reiterate
`
`and
`
`reallege
`
`each
`
`and
`
`every
`
`allegation
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`in
`
`"1"
`
`and
`
`effect
`
`paragraphs
`
`numbered
`
`through
`
`"101",
`
`with
`
`the
`
`same
`
`force
`
`as though
`
`more
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`herein.
`
`103.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`have
`
`a high
`
`likelihood
`
`of
`
`success
`
`on
`
`the merits
`
`on
`
`their
`
`causes
`
`of
`
`action,
`
`including
`
`their
`
`declaratory
`
`judgment
`
`causes
`
`of action,
`
`promissory
`
`estoppel
`
`cause
`
`of action,
`
`and
`
`breach
`
`of
`
`the
`
`covenant
`
`for
`
`good
`
`faith
`
`and
`
`fair
`
`dealing
`
`cause
`
`of action,
`
`104.
`
`If no injunction
`
`is issued,
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`will
`
`suffer
`
`irreparable
`
`injury.
`
`l3
`
`13 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/10/2020 02:38 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 721351/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/10/2020
`
`105.
`
`The
`
`balance
`
`of
`
`the
`
`equities
`
`weighs
`
`in favor
`
`of
`
`the Plaintiffs.
`
`106.
`
`The
`
`Plaintiffs
`
`do not
`
`have
`
`an adequate
`
`remedy
`
`at
`
`law.
`
`WHEREFORE,
`
`the Plaintiffs
`
`demand
`
`judgment
`
`against
`
`the Defendants
`
`as follows:
`
`(i)
`
`(ii)
`
`(iii)
`
`(iv)
`
`(v)
`
`(vi)
`
`On the
`First
`that
`declaring:
`payment
`2020
`of
`the doctrine
`
`On the Second
`that
`declaring
`payment
`2020
`the doctrine
`of
`
`of Action
`Plaintiffs'
`
`Cause
`the
`to AC35
`of
`
`in the
`
`impossibility;
`
`Cause
`of Action
`Plaintiffs'
`the
`to AC35
`of
`frustrated
`
`in the
`
`purpose;
`
`against
`perfonnance,
`amount
`
`of
`
`AC35
`
`for
`Judgment
`a Declaratory
`the November
`15,
`i.e.. making
`$6.15
`million
`is excused
`because
`
`against
`
`performance,
`amount
`
`Judgment
`AC35
`for
`a Declaratory
`the November
`15,
`i.e.. making
`of $6.15
`because
`is excused
`million
`
`On the Third
`of Action
`Cause
`to be determined
`amount
`at
`THOUSAND
`DOLLARS
`
`trial,
`($500,000.00);
`
`against
`but
`
`AC35
`for
`in no event
`
`promissory
`less
`than
`
`in the
`estoppel
`HUNDRED
`
`FIVE
`
`On the Fourth
`faith
`and
`good
`than
`event
`less
`
`Cause
`fair
`FIVE
`
`of Action
`in the
`dealing
`HUNDRED
`
`breach
`for
`AC35
`against
`to be determined
`amount
`THOUSAND
`DOLLARS
`
`of
`
`the
`at
`
`covenant
`but
`
`trial,
`($500,000.00);
`
`of
`in no
`
`On the
`
`Fifth
`
`Cause
`
`restraining
`Settlement
`
`and
`enjoining
`Agreement
`
`a permanent
`against
`of Action
`for
`AC35
`injunction,
`of
`the default
`from enforcing
`provisions
`AC35
`the Purchase
`and
`and Sale Agreement;
`
`or
`
`the
`
`of Action
`all Causes
`on
`attorneys'
`incurred
`fees
`be just,
`as may
`
`relief
`
`interest
`in bringing
`and
`proper,
`
`and
`
`disbursements,
`costs,
`this
`action
`and
`such
`equitable.
`
`and
`other
`
`reasonable
`and
`further
`
`Dated:
`
`Carle
`Place,
`November
`
`New York
`10, 2020
`
`espectfu
`The Scher
`Atto
`
`ubmitted,
`v ·
`Firm,
`f
`ey
`
`r
`
`LLP
`the Plaint
`
`ffs
`
`Graf
`
`, Esq.
`One Old
`Road,
`Country
`New York
`Carle
`Place,
`Telephone:
`746-5040
`
`(516)
`
`385
`
`Suite
`1 1514
`
`14
`
`14 of 16
`
`

`

`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/10/2020 02:38 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 721351/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/10/2020
`
`INDEX
`
`NUMBER
`
`VERIFICATION
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`COURT OF THE STATE
`SUPREME
`OF QUEENS
`COUNTY
`-----------------------··-------------------------------
`EROS MANAGEMENT
`AND REALTY,
`LLC,
`MANAGEMENT
`AND
`PIONEER
`REALTY,
`SHARMA,
`and JOHN
`LLC,
`
`X
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`-----X
`
`-against-
`
`AC35
`
`HOTEL
`
`PARTNERS
`
`LLC,
`
`----------------------------------------------
`
`ss.:
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`STATE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`COUNTY
`
`OF NASSAU
`
`JOHN SHARMA,
`
`being
`
`duly
`
`sworn,
`
`deposes
`
`and
`
`says:
`
`Deponent
`
`is one
`
`of
`
`the
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`and
`
`knows
`
`the
`
`contents
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`thereof;
`
`dep0ñent
`
`has
`
`read
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`VERIFIED
`
`the
`
`same
`
`is true
`
`to deponent's
`
`own
`
`knowledge,
`
`except
`
`as to the matters
`
`therein
`
`alleged
`
`upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`and
`
`those
`
`matters
`
`deponent
`
`believes
`
`to be true.
`
`JT)HN
`
`SHARMA
`
`rn to before m this
`O ay of Novem
`r 2020
`
`Nota
`
`Notary
`
`AUSTIN GRAFF
`State Of New York
`Public,
`No. 02GRa067404
`Q ualified
`In Nassau
`County
`Commission
`10, 20-
`Expiret
`Decernber
`
`15 of 16
`
`

`

`2—050 ‘02": 38 "p NYSC 3F DOC. NO.
`FILED: QUEENS COUNTY CLERK 11/10/2020 02:38 PM
`2
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 2
`
`INDEX NO. 721351/2020
`
`
` fiIV
`
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 11/10/2020
`
`16 of 16
`16 of 16
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket