`COUNTY
`
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`OF SUFFOLK
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`JOHN
`
`R. RICONDA
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`Index
`
`No.:
`
`3655/2012
`
`Hon.
`
`Jerry
`
`Garguilo
`
`LIBERTY
`
`INSURANCE
`
`UNDERWRITERS,
`
`[PROPOSEDI
`
`ORDER ON NOTICE
`
`INC.,
`
`Defendants.
`
`The Court,
`
`having
`
`reviewed
`
`the motions
`
`in limine
`
`filed
`
`by
`
`the
`
`parties
`
`and
`
`related
`
`pretrial
`
`submissions,
`
`and
`
`following
`
`oral
`
`argument
`
`on March
`
`14, 2018,
`
`it
`
`is hereby:
`
`ORDERED
`on the
`limine
`
`that
`Liberty's
`grounds
`
`motion
`
`that
`
`they
`
`in limine
`were
`filed
`
`an order
`for
`in letter
`form
`
`striking
`(Motion
`
`Riconda's
`Seq.
`
`013)
`
`in
`
`motions
`is denied;
`
`ORDERED
`judgment
`
`that
`
`motion
`Liberty's
`plaintiff's
`
`in limine
`post-note
`
`alternatively,
`or,
`faith
`issue
`bad
`
`of
`
`for
`claim
`
`partial
`(Motion
`
`summary
`Seq.
`
`010)
`
`is
`
`dismissing
`[denied/reserved];
`
`ORDERED
`
`referring
`
`that Riconda's
`to the monetary
`
`letter
`
`policy
`
`motion
`limit
`
`in limine
`No.
`
`(Dkt.
`
`for
`
`298)
`
`an order
`is denied;
`
`precluding
`
`Liberty
`
`from
`
`ORDERED
`
`referring
`is reserved;
`
`ORDERED
`$1,872,602
`
`that Riconda's
`"collusion"
`to alleged
`
`letter
`
`motion
`between
`
`in limine
`Riconda
`
`an order
`for
`precluding
`and Mr.
`Ed Cummings
`
`Liberty
`(Dkt.
`
`No.
`
`from
`
`296)
`
`Liberty's
`that
`in damages
`
`motion
`trial
`
`in limine
`(Motion
`Seq.
`
`at
`
`for
`
`an order
`precluding
`is denied;
`
`011)
`
`Riconda's
`
`recovery
`
`of
`
`ORDERED
`Liberty's
`that
`written
`interrogatories
`
`motion
`(Motion
`
`in limine
`Seq.
`
`012)
`
`a special
`for
`is denied;
`
`verdict
`
`form
`
`supported
`
`by
`
`that Riconda's
`the
`lawsuit
`(Dkt.
`No.
`
`motion
`
`letter
`captioned
`Ghio,
`is granted;
`
`297)
`
`an order
`for
`in limine
`et al.
`v. Pendergast,
`
`precluding
`et al., No.
`
`Liberty
`HHD-CV15-
`
`from
`
`ORDERED
`
`mentioning
`6058382-S
`
`ORDERED
`evidence
`letter
`(Dkt.
`Florida/New
`
`letter
`
`that Riconda's
`for
`of any
`reasons
`denying
`subject
`No.
`is denied,
`299)
`York
`of
`choice
`law motion,
`
`an order
`for
`motion
`precluding
`in Liberty's
`not
`stated
`coverage
`for
`to Riconda's
`request
`leave
`which
`in
`case Riconda
`
`may
`
`from
`introducing
`Liberty
`declination
`first
`to reargue
`the
`issue.
`re-raise
`
`this
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Dated:
`
`March
`New York,
`
`, 2018
`New York
`
`JERRY
`SUFFOLK
`JUSTICE
`
`GARGUILO
`COUNTY
`
`SUPREME
`
`COURT
`
`2
`
`