throbber
FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 07/30/2020 10:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 609765/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/30/2020
`
`Index
`
`No.
`
`20-
`
`SUMMONS
`
`: :
`
`: :
`
`:
`:
`
`: :
`
`: :
`
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`OF SUFFOLK
`------------------------------x
`DALTON
`
`SUPRINA,
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`- against
`
`-
`
`CEDAR
`
`LAKES
`
`ESTATE,
`
`LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`Defendant.
`
`------------------------------x
`
`TO:
`
`Cedar
`Lakes
`Estate,
`USA Way
`96 Team
`New York
`Port
`
`Jervis,
`
`LLC
`
`12771
`
`YOU ARE HEREBY
`
`SUMMONED
`
`to answer
`
`the Verified
`
`Complaint
`
`in this
`
`action
`
`and
`
`to serve
`
`a copy
`
`of
`
`your
`
`Verified
`
`Answer
`
`on the Plaintiff's
`
`attorneys
`
`within
`
`twenty
`
`days
`
`after
`
`the
`
`of
`
`of
`
`of
`
`or within
`
`after
`
`completion
`
`service
`
`this
`
`Summons,
`
`exclusive
`
`the
`
`day
`
`service,
`
`thirty
`
`days
`
`the
`
`of
`
`service
`
`made
`
`in any manner
`
`other
`
`than
`
`personal
`
`delivery
`
`within
`
`the State
`
`of New York.
`
`In case
`
`of
`
`your
`
`failure
`
`to
`
`appear
`
`or
`
`answer,
`
`judgment
`
`will
`
`be
`
`taken
`
`against
`
`you
`
`by
`
`default
`
`for
`
`the
`
`relief
`
`demanded
`
`in the Verified
`
`Complaint.
`
`Dated:
`
`July
`
`30,
`
`2020
`
`FARRELL
`
`FRITZ,
`
`P.C.
`
`By: V PQBardtolo1nese
`
`Kathryn
`C. Cole
`Bartholomew
`Paige
`for
`Attorneys
`Plaintiff
`400 RXR Plaza
`New York
`Uniondale,
`227-0700
`
`(516)
`
`11556
`
`FF\9631338.1
`
`1 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 07/30/2020 10:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 609765/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/30/2020
`
`Index
`
`No.
`
`20-
`
`VERIFIED
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`: :
`
`:
`:
`
`: :
`
`: :
`
`: :
`
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`OF SUFFOLK
`--------------------------------x
`DALTON
`
`SUPRINA,
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`- against
`
`-
`
`CEDAR
`
`LAKES
`
`ESTATE,
`
`LLC,
`
`Defendant.
`
`--------------------------------x
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Dalton
`
`Suprina
`
`("Suprina"),
`
`by
`
`and
`
`through
`
`his
`
`attorneys,
`
`Farrell
`
`Fritz,
`
`P.C.,
`
`as
`
`and
`
`for
`
`his
`
`Verified
`
`Complaint
`
`against
`
`defendant
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`Estate,
`
`LLC
`
`("Cedar
`
`Lakes"),
`
`alleges
`
`as follows:
`
`NATURE
`
`OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This
`
`action
`
`arises
`
`from
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes'
`
`anticipatory
`
`and
`
`actual
`
`breaches
`
`of a written
`
`agreement
`
`between
`
`Suprina
`
`and Cedar
`
`Lakes,
`
`pursuant
`
`to which
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`agreed
`
`to host
`
`at
`
`its
`
`venue
`
`Suprina's
`
`wedding
`
`nuptials
`
`on the weekend
`
`of September
`
`25-27,
`
`2020.
`
`just
`
`planned
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`2.
`
`However,
`
`three
`
`months
`
`before
`
`the
`
`wedding
`
`event,
`
`advised
`
`Suprina
`
`that,
`
`in light
`
`of
`
`the COVID-19
`
`pandemic
`
`and
`
`resulting
`
`social
`
`distancing
`
`orders,
`
`it would
`
`not
`
`be
`
`able
`
`to
`
`perform
`
`many
`
`of
`
`its
`
`obligations
`
`under
`
`the
`
`agreement
`
`as
`
`originally
`
`contemplated,
`
`and would
`
`ultimately
`
`be unable
`
`to host
`
`the
`
`dream
`
`wedding
`
`Suprina
`
`contracted
`
`for.
`
`wedding
`
`3.
`
`4.
`
`Although
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`purports
`
`"with
`
`unwavering
`
`assurance,"
`
`to
`
`"host
`
`the
`
`of
`
`your
`
`dreams,"
`
`Suprina's
`
`experience
`
`has
`
`been
`
`nothing
`
`short
`
`of a nightmare.
`
`Indeed,
`
`rather
`
`than
`
`negotiate
`
`in
`
`good
`
`faith
`
`to
`
`enter
`
`into
`
`a new
`
`agreement
`
`to
`
`reschedule
`
`Suprina's
`
`wedding
`
`event
`
`to a new,
`
`mutually-agreeable
`
`weekend
`
`in 2021,
`
`as required
`
`2 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 07/30/2020 10:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 609765/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/30/2020
`
`parties'
`
`by
`
`the
`
`agreement
`
`and
`
`the
`
`addendum
`
`thereto,
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`has
`
`engaged
`
`in a pattern
`
`of bad
`
`faith
`
`conduct
`
`designed
`
`to
`
`take
`
`advantage
`
`of
`
`Suprina's
`
`vulnerable
`
`situation
`
`while
`
`positioning
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`to have
`
`its proverbial
`
`cake
`
`and
`
`eat
`
`it,
`
`too.
`
`5.
`
`For
`
`example,
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`repeatedly
`
`informed
`
`Suprina
`
`it
`
`had
`
`only
`
`weekday
`
`availability
`
`in
`
`2021,
`
`at weekend
`
`rates,
`
`while
`
`simultaneously
`
`offering
`
`2021
`
`weekend
`
`dates
`
`to
`
`potential
`
`new business.
`
`6.
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`also
`
`purported
`
`to offer
`
`Suprina
`
`various
`
`alternative
`
`"options"
`
`for
`
`his
`
`wedding
`
`event,
`
`which
`
`were
`
`neither
`
`practicable
`
`under
`
`the
`
`circumstances
`
`nor what
`
`the
`
`parties'
`
`had
`
`agreed
`
`upon,
`
`and which
`
`would
`
`have
`
`required
`
`Suprina
`
`to incur
`
`significant
`
`additional
`
`costs.
`
`7.
`
`Accordingly,
`
`Suprina
`
`seeks
`
`to
`
`recover
`
`his
`
`full
`
`deposit
`
`based
`
`on Cedar
`
`anticipatory
`
`and
`
`actual
`
`breaches
`
`of
`
`the
`
`parties'
`
`agreement
`
`and
`
`addendum.
`
`Lakes'
`
`of
`
`8.
`
`Suprina
`
`also
`
`brings
`
`this
`
`action
`
`for
`
`a declaratory
`
`judgment
`
`based
`
`on the
`
`doctrine
`
`frustration
`
`of purpose,
`
`as a result
`
`of
`
`the
`
`totally
`
`unforeseen
`
`COVID-19
`
`pandemic
`
`which
`
`rendered
`
`impossible
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes'
`
`performance
`
`of
`
`its obligations
`
`as originally
`
`contemplated
`
`and
`
`frustrated
`
`the
`
`entire
`
`purpose
`
`of
`
`the
`
`agreement.
`
`9.
`
`Indeed,
`
`Suprina
`
`did
`
`not
`
`contract
`
`for
`
`the wedding
`
`of
`
`his
`
`dreams
`
`to
`
`be
`
`one with
`
`social
`
`guests
`
`unable
`
`or embrace
`
`one
`
`another,
`
`and with
`
`no
`
`distancing
`
`in place,
`
`to dance,
`
`mingle,
`
`open
`
`bar
`
`or cocktail
`
`hour.
`
`10.
`
`Because
`
`the
`
`fundamental
`
`purpose
`
`and
`
`overall
`
`nature
`
`of
`
`the
`
`parties'
`
`agreement
`
`has
`
`been
`
`frustrated
`
`by
`
`the COVID-19
`
`outbreak
`
`and
`
`resulting
`
`social
`
`distancing
`
`restrictions,
`
`Suprina
`
`seeks
`
`a declaration
`
`that
`
`the
`
`parties
`
`are discharged
`
`from
`
`any
`
`obligations
`
`under
`
`the
`
`agreement,
`
`and
`
`that
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`is obligated
`
`to refund
`
`all monies
`
`Suprina
`
`paid
`
`under
`
`the
`
`parties'
`
`agreement
`
`to
`
`date.
`
`2
`
`3 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 07/30/2020 10:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 609765/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/30/2020
`
`PARTIES
`
`11.
`
`12.
`
`Suprina
`
`is an individual
`
`who
`
`resides
`
`in the County
`
`of Suffolk,
`
`State
`
`of New York.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`is
`
`a limited
`
`liability
`
`company
`
`duly
`
`organized
`
`under
`
`the
`
`laws
`
`of
`
`the State
`
`of New York,
`
`with
`
`a principal
`
`place
`
`of business
`
`located
`
`at
`
`96 Team
`
`USA Way,
`
`Port
`
`Jervis,
`
`New York
`
`12771.
`
`FACTS
`
`COMMON
`
`TO ALL
`
`CAUSES
`
`OF ACTION
`
`Cedar
`
`venue
`
`located
`
`on
`
`a 500-acre
`
`estate
`
`in
`
`the
`
`13.
`
`Lakes
`
`is a full-service
`
`wedding
`
`Hudson
`
`Valley,
`
`approximately
`
`70 miles
`
`north
`
`of New York
`
`City.
`
`14.
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes'
`
`facilities
`
`include,
`
`among
`
`other
`
`things,
`
`an
`
`indoor
`
`barn,
`
`an
`
`amphitheater,
`
`a dining
`
`and
`
`garden
`
`pavilion,
`
`an
`
`after
`
`party
`
`venue,
`
`pools,
`
`tennis
`
`and
`
`basketball
`
`courts,
`
`and
`
`luxury
`
`overnight
`
`accommodations
`
`(the
`
`"Facilities").
`
`15.
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`routinely
`
`hosts
`
`weddings,
`
`corporate
`
`retreats,
`
`and
`
`other
`
`private
`
`can
`
`than
`
`getaways,
`
`and
`
`accommodate
`
`more
`
`400
`
`guests
`
`at a time.
`
`16.
`
`According
`
`to
`
`its website,
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`is
`
`committed
`
`to
`
`"maintaining
`
`the
`
`highest
`
`quality
`
`of
`
`service,
`
`care
`
`and
`
`personalization,"
`
`and
`
`guarantees,
`
`"with
`
`unwavering
`
`assurance,"
`
`to
`
`"host
`
`the wedding
`
`of
`
`your
`
`dreams."
`
`A.
`
`The
`
`Agreement
`
`17.
`
`On or
`
`about
`
`August
`
`21,
`
`2019,
`
`Suprina
`
`and
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`entered
`
`into
`
`a written
`
`agreement
`
`(the
`
`pursuant
`
`Cedar
`
`"Agreement"),
`
`to which
`
`Lakes
`
`agreed
`
`to host
`
`Suprina's
`
`wedding
`
`nuptials
`
`for
`
`the
`
`entire
`
`weekend
`
`of
`
`September
`
`25,
`
`2020
`
`through
`
`September
`
`27,
`
`2020
`
`(the
`
`"Weekend
`
`Event"),
`
`for
`
`a minimum
`
`guaranteed
`
`price
`
`of $155,700
`
`(the
`
`"Minimum
`
`Guarantee").
`
`18.
`
`Pursuant
`
`to the Agreement,
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`agreed
`
`to provide
`
`Suprina
`
`and
`
`his
`
`fiancé
`
`a comprehensive
`
`wedding
`
`package,
`
`which
`
`includes,
`
`among
`
`other
`
`things,
`
`full
`
`use
`
`of
`
`the Facilities,
`
`3
`
`4 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 07/30/2020 10:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 609765/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/30/2020
`
`overnight
`
`accommodations,
`
`transportation,
`
`and
`
`food
`
`and
`
`catering
`
`services
`
`for
`
`the
`
`entire
`
`Weekend
`
`Event.
`
`19.
`
`The
`
`Agreement
`
`expressly
`
`provides
`
`Suprina
`
`and
`
`his
`
`anticipated
`
`wedding
`
`guests
`
`with
`
`access
`
`to the
`
`following
`
`Facilities
`
`during
`
`the wedding
`
`ceremony
`
`and
`
`reception:
`
`a.
`
`The
`
`dining
`
`pavilion,
`
`barn
`
`patio
`
`or pool
`
`patio
`
`for
`
`the
`
`cocktail
`
`hour;
`
`The
`
`indoor
`
`barn
`
`for
`
`b.
`
`c.
`
`d.
`
`e.
`
`the wedding
`
`reception;
`
`The mountaintop,
`
`amphitheater
`
`or great
`
`lawn
`
`for
`
`the wedding
`
`ceremony;
`
`The
`
`dining
`
`pavilion
`
`or garden
`
`for
`
`the
`
`rehearsal
`
`dinner;
`
`and
`
`The
`
`dining
`
`pavilion
`
`or
`
`"treehouse"
`
`for
`
`the
`
`after
`
`party.
`
`20.
`
`The
`
`Agreement
`
`provides
`
`for
`
`an
`
`interactive
`
`cocktail
`
`hour,
`
`during
`
`which
`
`hors
`
`d'oeuvres
`
`would
`
`be passed
`
`and
`
`Suprina's
`
`guests
`
`would
`
`be permitted
`
`to move
`
`and mingle
`
`freely
`
`amongst
`
`each
`
`other.
`
`21.
`
`In addition,
`
`the Agreement
`
`provides
`
`for
`
`one
`
`large
`
`wedding
`
`reception
`
`to take
`
`place
`
`inside
`
`the
`
`barn,
`
`during
`
`which
`
`guests
`
`would
`
`be served
`
`dinner,
`
`and
`
`be permitted
`
`to leave
`
`their
`
`seats
`
`to enjoy
`
`the
`
`open
`
`bar,
`
`to dance,
`
`and
`
`to freely
`
`gather
`
`and mingle
`
`amongst
`
`each
`
`other.
`
`22.
`
`On August
`
`2, 2019,
`
`Suprina
`
`paid
`
`to Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`the
`
`initial
`
`security
`
`deposit
`
`in the
`
`amount
`
`of $7,500
`
`toward
`
`the Minimum
`
`Guarantee.
`
`23.
`
`On September
`
`5, 2019,
`
`Suprina
`
`paid
`
`an additional
`
`$77,850
`
`toward
`
`the Minimum
`
`Guarantee.
`
`24.
`
`Thereafter,
`
`Suprina
`
`and
`
`his
`
`fiancé
`
`began
`
`to plan
`
`for
`
`their
`
`dream
`
`wedding
`
`at Cedar
`
`Lakes,
`
`engaging
`
`vendors
`
`and making
`
`plans
`
`for
`
`their
`
`special
`
`day.
`
`B.
`
`The Addendum
`
`25.
`
`Beginning
`
`in April
`
`2020,
`
`Suprina
`
`expressed
`
`to Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`his
`
`concerns
`
`that
`
`4
`
`5 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 07/30/2020 10:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 609765/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/30/2020
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`may
`
`not
`
`be
`
`able
`
`to
`
`perform
`
`many
`
`of
`
`its
`
`obligations
`
`under
`
`the
`
`Agreement
`
`as
`
`contemplated,
`
`in light
`
`of
`
`the COVID-19
`
`outbreak
`
`and
`
`resulting
`
`social
`
`distancing
`
`restrictions.
`
`26.
`
`In
`
`response,
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`advised
`
`Suprina
`
`that
`
`the
`
`parties
`
`could
`
`reschedule
`
`the
`
`Weekend
`
`Event
`
`to a new, mutually-agreeable
`
`date
`
`in 2021,
`
`if necessary,
`
`and
`
`that
`
`all monies
`
`paid
`
`under
`
`Agreement
`
`under
`
`agreement
`
`("New
`
`the
`
`would
`
`be
`
`applied
`
`to
`
`payments
`
`owed
`
`a new
`
`Agreement").
`
`27.
`
`In
`
`furtherance
`
`of
`
`this
`
`promise,
`
`Suprina
`
`executed,
`
`on
`
`or
`
`about
`
`June
`
`18,
`
`2020,
`
`Addendum
`
`No.
`
`1 to the Agreement
`
`(the
`
`"Addendum").
`
`28.
`
`The
`
`Addendum
`
`provides,
`
`among
`
`other
`
`things,
`
`that
`
`the
`
`parties
`
`would
`
`enter
`
`into
`
`a
`
`New
`
`Agreement
`
`if
`
`it became
`
`necessary
`
`to
`
`reschedule
`
`the Weekend
`
`Event
`
`to
`
`a new
`
`date
`
`as a
`
`social
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the COVID-19
`
`outbreak
`
`and
`
`resulting
`
`distancing
`
`restrictions.
`
`29.
`
`The
`
`Addendum
`
`further
`
`provides
`
`that
`
`all monies
`
`paid
`
`by Suprina
`
`to Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`under
`
`the Agreement
`
`would
`
`be fully
`
`applied
`
`to payments
`
`due
`
`under
`
`the New Agreement.
`
`30.
`
`The
`
`Addendum
`
`obligated
`
`Suprina
`
`and Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`to
`
`negotiate
`
`in
`
`good
`
`faith
`
`a
`
`New Agreement
`
`and
`
`reschedule
`
`the Weekend
`
`Event
`
`to a new, mutually-agreeable
`
`date.
`
`In
`
`light
`
`of
`
`about
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes'
`
`to
`
`perform
`
`its
`
`31.
`
`Suprina's
`
`concerns
`
`obligations
`
`under
`
`the
`
`Agreement
`
`as
`
`planned,
`
`and
`
`until
`
`Cedar
`
`ability
`
`Lakes'
`
`provided
`
`adequate
`
`assurance
`
`of
`
`its
`
`performance,
`
`Suprina
`
`and
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`discussed
`
`deferral
`
`of
`
`certain
`
`of
`
`the
`
`remaining
`
`monies
`
`owed
`
`under
`
`the Minimum
`
`Guarantee.
`
`32.
`
`As
`
`a result
`
`of
`
`these
`
`uncertainties,
`
`Suprina
`
`paid
`
`an
`
`additional
`
`$19,462.50
`
`toward
`
`the
`
`final
`
`installment
`
`of
`
`the Minimum
`
`Guarantee.
`
`5
`
`6 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 07/30/2020 10:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 609765/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/30/2020
`
`C.
`
`Cedar
`Repudiates
`Lakes
`Faith
`in Good
`Negotiate
`Mutually-Agreeable
`
`New,
`
`Obligations
`its
`a New Agreement
`in 2021
`Date
`
`Under
`the
`to Reschedule
`
`Agreement
`the Weekend
`
`and
`
`Fails
`Event
`
`to
`a
`
`to
`
`33.
`
`On or
`
`about
`
`June
`
`26,
`
`2020,
`
`Suprina
`
`reiterated
`
`to Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`his
`
`concern
`
`that
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`would
`
`not
`
`be able
`
`to perform
`
`its
`
`obligations
`
`under
`
`the Agreement
`
`as contemplated
`
`in light
`
`of ongoing
`
`COVID-related
`
`social
`
`distancing
`
`restrictions.
`
`34.
`
`Suprina
`
`in
`
`good
`
`faith
`
`demanded
`
`that
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`provide
`
`adequate
`
`assurance
`
`of
`
`all
`
`of
`
`under
`
`its ability
`
`to perform
`
`its obligations
`
`the Agreement
`
`as originally
`
`contemplated.
`
`35.
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes,
`
`however,
`
`was
`
`unable
`
`provide
`
`Suprina
`
`with
`
`adequate
`
`assurance
`
`that
`
`it would
`
`be
`
`able
`
`to perform
`
`under
`
`the Agreement
`
`as originally
`
`contemplated
`
`or host
`
`the
`
`dream
`
`Weekend
`
`Event
`
`Suprina
`
`contracted
`
`for.
`
`36.
`
`Rather
`
`than
`
`provide
`
`the
`
`assurances
`
`requested
`
`by
`
`Suprina,
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`offered
`
`Suprina
`
`two
`
`alternative
`
`options,
`
`neither
`
`of which
`
`were
`
`practicable
`
`under
`
`the
`
`circumstances
`
`nor
`
`anywhere
`
`near
`
`what
`
`the
`
`parties'
`
`had
`
`agreed
`
`upon,
`
`and which
`
`would
`
`have
`
`required
`
`Suprina
`
`to
`
`incur
`
`significant
`
`additional
`
`costs.
`
`37.
`
`Under
`
`the
`
`first
`
`potential
`
`option,
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`offered
`
`to
`
`host
`
`four
`
`separate,
`
`50-
`
`person
`
`receptions
`
`over
`
`the
`
`course
`
`of
`
`four
`
`different
`
`nights.
`
`38.
`
`This
`
`option,
`
`however,
`
`would
`
`have
`
`required
`
`Suprina
`
`to pay
`
`certain
`
`vendors,
`
`such
`
`the
`
`and
`
`hair
`
`to work
`
`four
`
`separate
`
`as
`
`DJ,
`
`wedding
`
`planner,
`
`florist,
`
`and makeup
`
`personnel,
`
`receptions
`
`instead
`
`of one.
`
`39.
`
`Under
`
`the
`
`second
`
`potential
`
`option,
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`offered
`
`to
`
`host
`
`one
`
`reception
`
`during
`
`which
`
`Suprina's
`
`anticipated
`
`guests
`
`would
`
`be
`
`divided
`
`into
`
`several,
`
`separate
`
`50-person
`
`groups,
`
`with
`
`each
`
`group
`
`relegated
`
`to a different
`
`location
`
`throughout
`
`the
`
`estate.
`
`40.
`
`Under
`
`either
`
`"option,"
`
`Suprina's
`
`anticipated
`
`guests
`
`would
`
`not
`
`be able
`
`to celebrate
`
`6
`
`7 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 07/30/2020 10:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 609765/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/30/2020
`
`together
`
`in the
`
`barn
`
`as originally
`
`planned.
`
`41.
`
`In
`
`addition,
`
`no
`
`dancing
`
`would
`
`be permitted
`
`at
`
`the
`
`reception
`
`under
`
`either
`
`option,
`
`and Suprina's
`
`guests
`
`would
`
`no longer
`
`be able
`
`to utilize
`
`the
`
`open
`
`bar.
`
`42.
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`also
`
`advised
`
`Suprina
`
`that,
`
`under
`
`either
`
`option,
`
`there
`
`would
`
`no
`
`longer
`
`be
`
`a cocktail
`
`hour,
`
`and
`
`Suprina's
`
`guests
`
`would
`
`not
`
`be
`
`permitted
`
`to
`
`freely
`
`mingle
`
`and
`
`gather
`
`amongst
`
`themselves.
`
`43.
`
`As
`
`a result
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes'
`
`stated
`
`inability
`
`to
`
`perform
`
`under
`
`the
`
`Agreement
`
`as
`
`originally
`
`contemplated,
`
`and
`
`its
`
`failure
`
`to offer
`
`any
`
`viable
`
`alternative
`
`options,
`
`Suprina
`
`attempted
`
`to negotiate
`
`with
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`for
`
`a New Agreement
`
`to reschedule
`
`the Weekend
`
`Event
`
`to a new
`
`weekend
`
`date
`
`in 2021,
`
`as required
`
`by
`
`the Addendum.
`
`44.
`
`However,
`
`notwithstanding
`
`that
`
`the
`
`Agreement
`
`provided
`
`for
`
`an
`
`entire
`
`weekend
`
`Cedar
`
`refused
`
`to
`
`offer
`
`Suprina
`
`weekend
`
`dates
`
`in
`
`wedding,
`
`Lakes
`
`weekday
`
`availability.
`
`any
`
`2021,
`
`claiming
`
`only
`
`45.
`
`In
`
`addition,
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`advised
`
`Suprina
`
`he would
`
`be
`
`charged
`
`a weekend
`
`rate,
`
`even
`
`if
`
`the Weekend
`
`Event
`
`was
`
`rescheduled
`
`to a weekday.
`
`46.
`
`Eventually,
`
`and
`
`only
`
`after
`
`repeated
`
`requests
`
`for
`
`a weekend
`
`date,
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`offered
`
`Suprina
`
`two
`
`weekend
`
`dates
`
`- April
`
`30
`
`through
`
`May
`
`2,
`
`2021
`
`and October
`
`22
`
`through
`
`October
`
`24,
`
`2021
`
`(the
`
`"2021
`
`Dates").
`
`Cedar
`
`47.
`
`48.
`
`Lakes
`
`insisted
`
`it had
`
`no other
`
`weekend
`
`availability
`
`during
`
`2021.
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`also
`
`advised
`
`Suprina
`
`he
`
`would
`
`be
`
`required
`
`to
`
`execute
`
`a non-
`
`disclosure
`
`agreement
`
`("Non-Disclosure
`
`Agreement")
`
`as
`
`a condition
`
`to
`
`securing
`
`either
`
`of
`
`the
`
`2021
`
`Dates,
`
`since
`
`the
`
`2021
`
`Dates
`
`offered
`
`by Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`were
`
`allegedly
`
`not
`
`offered
`
`to any
`
`other
`
`couple
`
`who,
`
`like
`
`Suprina,
`
`was
`
`looking
`
`to reschedule
`
`their
`
`2020
`
`wedding.
`
`7
`
`8 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 07/30/2020 10:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 609765/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/30/2020
`
`49.
`
`Suprina
`
`advised
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`that
`
`the
`
`2021
`
`Dates
`
`were
`
`not
`
`acceptable,
`
`as he and
`
`his
`
`fiancé
`
`were
`
`not
`
`available
`
`on either
`
`of
`
`the
`
`2021
`
`Dates.
`
`50.
`
`Suprina
`
`again
`
`requested
`
`from
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`additional
`
`2021
`
`weekend
`
`availability,
`
`but was
`
`advised
`
`disingenuously
`
`that
`
`the
`
`venue
`
`had
`
`no other
`
`weekend
`
`availability.
`
`51.
`
`Indeed,
`
`Suprina
`
`later
`
`discovered
`
`that
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`had
`
`multiple
`
`additional
`
`weekend
`
`dates
`
`available
`
`during
`
`2021,
`
`beyond
`
`the
`
`2021
`
`Dates
`
`offered
`
`to Suprina.
`
`52.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`has
`
`held
`
`hostage
`
`and
`
`refused
`
`to offer
`
`to
`
`Suprina
`
`these
`
`additional
`
`2021
`
`weekend
`
`dates
`
`in
`
`an
`
`effort
`
`to
`
`obtain
`
`new
`
`business,
`
`while
`
`simultaneously
`
`advising
`
`Suprina,
`
`and
`
`other
`
`couples
`
`with
`
`existing
`
`contracts
`
`for
`
`2020
`
`wedding
`
`dates,
`
`that
`
`there
`
`is no weekend
`
`availability
`
`in 2021.
`
`with
`
`53.
`
`In
`
`addition,
`
`upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`is advising
`
`couples
`
`existing
`
`contracts
`
`that
`
`weekend
`
`rates
`
`will
`
`apply
`
`to
`
`all
`
`rescheduled
`
`dates,
`
`regardless
`
`of whether
`
`the
`
`rescheduled
`
`date
`
`falls
`
`on a weekday.
`
`54.
`
`By
`
`claiming
`
`weekday-only
`
`availability
`
`in 2021
`
`at weekend
`
`rates,
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`is
`
`seeking
`
`to capitalize
`
`on the misfortune
`
`of
`
`desperate
`
`and
`
`vulnerable
`
`couples
`
`amidst
`
`the COVID-
`
`19 pandemic.
`
`Cedar
`
`with
`
`Suprina
`
`in
`
`faith
`
`to reach
`
`a New
`
`55.
`
`Lakes
`
`has
`
`refused
`
`to negotiate
`
`good
`
`Agreement
`
`to
`
`reschedule
`
`the Weekend
`
`Event
`
`to
`
`a new,
`
`mutually-agreeable
`
`weekend
`
`date
`
`in
`
`2021,
`
`as required
`
`by
`
`the Addendum.
`
`56.
`
`To
`
`date,
`
`Suprina
`
`has
`
`paid
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`$104,812.50,
`
`none
`
`of which
`
`has
`
`been
`
`refunded
`
`to Suprina.
`
`(Breach
`
`FIRST
`of Contract:
`
`CAUSE
`
`OF ACTION
`
`Anticipatory
`
`Repudiation)
`
`57.
`
`Suprina
`
`repeats
`
`and
`
`realleges
`
`each
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`allegations
`
`as if
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`8
`
`9 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 07/30/2020 10:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 609765/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/30/2020
`
`at
`
`length
`
`herein.
`
`58.
`
`59.
`
`60.
`
`The Agreement
`
`is a valid
`
`and
`
`binding
`
`contract
`
`between
`
`Suprina
`
`and Cedar
`
`Lakes.
`
`Suprina
`
`has
`
`fully
`
`complied
`
`with
`
`his
`
`obligations
`
`under
`
`the Agreement.
`
`On or
`
`about
`
`June
`
`26,
`
`2020,
`
`Suprina
`
`expressed
`
`to Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`his
`
`concerns
`
`that
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`would
`
`not
`
`be
`
`able
`
`to
`
`perform
`
`its
`
`obligations
`
`under
`
`the
`
`Agreement
`
`as originally
`
`contemplated.
`
`61.
`
`Suprina
`
`demanded
`
`in
`
`good
`
`faith
`
`that
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`provide
`
`adequate
`
`assurances
`
`that
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`will
`
`perform
`
`all
`
`of
`
`its
`
`obligations
`
`under
`
`the
`
`Agreement
`
`as
`
`originally
`
`contemplated.
`
`62.
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`failed
`
`to provide
`
`Suprina
`
`with
`
`adequate
`
`assurances
`
`that
`
`it would
`
`be
`
`able
`
`to perform
`
`all
`
`of
`
`its obligations
`
`under
`
`the Agreement
`
`as originally
`
`contemplated.
`
`Cedar
`
`through
`
`and
`
`63.
`
`Lakes,
`
`its
`
`actions
`
`and
`
`words,
`
`has
`
`clearly
`
`unequivocally
`
`indicated
`
`that
`
`it will
`
`not
`
`be
`
`able
`
`to
`
`perform
`
`its
`
`obligations
`
`under
`
`the
`
`Agreement
`
`as originally
`
`contemplated.
`
`64.
`
`65.
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`has
`
`repudiated
`
`its
`
`contractual
`
`obligations
`
`under
`
`the Agreement.
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes'
`
`repudiation
`
`of
`
`its obligations
`
`under
`
`the Agreement
`
`is an anticipatory
`
`breach
`
`of
`
`the Agreement.
`
`Suprina
`
`return
`
`of
`
`to Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`to
`
`66.
`
`is
`
`therefore
`
`entitled
`
`to
`
`the
`
`all monies
`
`paid
`
`date.
`
`67.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Suprina
`
`has
`
`been
`
`damaged
`
`in
`
`an
`
`amount
`
`to
`
`be
`
`determined
`
`at
`
`trial,
`
`but
`
`believed
`
`to be no less
`
`than
`
`$104,812.50.
`
`SECOND
`of Contract:
`
`CAUSE
`Breach
`
`OF ACTION
`of
`the Addendum)
`
`(Breach
`
`68.
`
`Suprina
`
`repeats
`
`and
`
`realleges
`
`each
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`allegations
`
`as if
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`9
`
`10 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 07/30/2020 10:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 609765/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/30/2020
`
`at
`
`length
`
`herein.
`
`69.
`
`70.
`
`71.
`
`The Addendum
`
`is a valid
`
`and
`
`binding
`
`contract
`
`between
`
`Suprina
`
`and Cedar
`
`Lakes.
`
`Suprina
`
`has
`
`fully
`
`complied
`
`with
`
`his
`
`obligations
`
`under
`
`the Addendum.
`
`The
`
`Addendum
`
`obligated
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`to,
`
`among
`
`other
`
`things,
`
`enter
`
`into
`
`a New
`
`Agreement
`
`with
`
`Suprina
`
`to reschedule
`
`the Weekend
`
`Event
`
`to a new, mutually-agreeable
`
`date.
`
`In
`
`Addendum
`
`that
`
`all monies
`
`paid
`
`Suprina
`
`to Cedar
`
`72.
`
`addition,
`
`the
`
`provided
`
`by
`
`Lakes
`
`would
`
`be applied
`
`to payments
`
`owed
`
`under
`
`the New Agreement.
`
`73.
`
`On or
`
`about
`
`June
`
`26,
`
`2020,
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`clearly
`
`and
`
`unequivocally
`
`indicated
`
`it
`
`would
`
`not
`
`be able
`
`to perform
`
`its obligations
`
`under
`
`the Agreement
`
`as originally
`
`contemplated
`
`as a
`
`result
`
`of
`
`the COVID-19
`
`outbreak
`
`and
`
`resulting
`
`social
`
`distancing
`
`restrictions.
`
`74.
`
`As
`
`under
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`was
`
`obligated
`
`to enter
`
`into
`
`a New
`
`a result,
`
`the Addendum,
`
`Agreement
`
`with
`
`Suprina
`
`to reschedule
`
`to a new, mutually-agreeable
`
`date
`
`the Weekend
`
`Event.
`
`75.
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`breached
`
`its
`
`obligations
`
`under
`
`the
`
`Addendum
`
`by
`
`refusing
`
`to
`
`negotiate
`
`with
`
`Suprina
`
`in good
`
`faith
`
`toward
`
`a New Agreement
`
`to reschedule
`
`the Weekend
`
`Event
`
`to a new, mutually-agreeable
`
`date.
`
`76.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Suprina
`
`has
`
`been
`
`damaged
`
`in
`
`an
`
`amount
`
`to
`
`be
`
`at
`
`but
`
`to be no less
`
`than
`
`$104,812.50.
`
`determined
`
`trial,
`
`believed
`
`CAUSE
`THIRD
`(Unjust
`
`Enrichment)
`
`OF ACTION
`
`77.
`
`Suprina
`
`repeats
`
`and
`
`realleges
`
`each
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`allegations
`
`as if
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`at
`
`length
`
`herein.
`
`78.
`
`To
`
`date,
`
`Suprina
`
`has
`
`paid
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`the
`
`sum of
`
`$104,812.50
`
`pursuant
`
`to
`
`the
`
`Agreement.
`
`79.
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes,
`
`however,
`
`has
`
`clearly
`
`and
`
`unequivocally
`
`stated
`
`it will
`
`not
`
`be able
`
`to
`
`10
`
`11 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 07/30/2020 10:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 609765/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/30/2020
`
`perform
`
`many
`
`of
`
`its obligations
`
`under
`
`the Agreement
`
`as originally
`
`contemplated,
`
`and
`
`has
`
`refused
`
`to negotiate
`
`in
`
`good
`
`faith
`
`a new
`
`agreement
`
`to reschedule
`
`the Weekend
`
`Event
`
`to
`
`a weekend
`
`in
`
`2021.
`
`80.
`
`Upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`has
`
`not
`
`performed
`
`any
`
`services
`
`in
`
`connection
`
`with
`
`the Weekend
`
`Event
`
`to date.
`
`81.
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`has not
`
`refunded
`
`the
`
`$104,812.50
`
`paid
`
`to date.
`
`82.
`
`83.
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`has
`
`therefore
`
`been
`
`unjustly
`
`enriched
`
`at Suprina's
`
`expense.
`
`It would
`
`be
`
`against
`
`equity
`
`and
`
`good
`
`conscience
`
`to permit
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`to retain
`
`by Suprina
`
`the monies
`
`paid
`
`by Suprina.
`
`84.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`Suprina
`
`has
`
`been
`
`damaged
`
`in
`
`an
`
`amount
`
`to
`
`be
`
`determined
`
`at
`
`trial,
`
`but
`
`believed
`
`to be no less
`
`than
`
`$104,812.50.
`
`FOURTH
`
`CAUSE
`
`OF ACTION
`
`Judgment)
`
`(Declaratory
`
`85.
`
`Suprina
`
`repeats
`
`and
`
`realleges
`
`each
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing
`
`allegations
`
`as if
`
`fully
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`at
`
`length
`
`herein.
`
`86.
`
`As
`
`set
`
`forth
`
`in
`
`detail
`
`above,
`
`the
`
`fundamental
`
`purpose
`
`and
`
`overall
`
`nature
`
`of
`
`the
`
`Agreement
`
`has
`
`been
`
`frustrated
`
`by
`
`the
`
`COVID-19
`
`outbreak
`
`and
`
`resulting
`
`social
`
`distancing
`
`restrictions.
`
`The
`
`COVID-19
`
`outbreak
`
`and
`
`social
`
`restrictions
`
`are
`
`87.
`
`resulting
`
`distancing
`
`unforeseen
`
`events
`
`which
`
`were
`
`neither
`
`contemplated
`
`the parties
`
`nor within
`
`the
`
`by
`
`parties'
`
`control.
`
`88.
`
`There
`
`is
`
`an
`
`actual,
`
`justiciable
`
`controversy
`
`between
`
`Suprina
`
`and
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`concerning
`
`parties'
`
`the
`
`respective
`
`obligations
`
`under
`
`the Agreement
`
`and Addendum
`
`in light
`
`of
`
`the
`
`COVID-19
`
`outbreak
`
`and
`
`resulting
`
`social
`
`distancing
`
`orders.
`
`89.
`
`Suprina
`
`has no adequate
`
`remedy
`
`at
`
`law.
`
`11
`
`12 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 07/30/2020 10:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 609765/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/30/2020
`
`90.
`
`By
`
`reason
`
`of
`
`the
`
`foregoing,
`
`the
`
`Court
`
`should
`
`declare
`
`that
`
`the
`
`parties
`
`are
`
`discharged
`
`from
`
`any
`
`obligations
`
`under
`
`the Agreement
`
`and
`
`Addendum,
`
`and
`
`that
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`is
`
`obligated
`
`to refund
`
`Suprina
`
`the
`
`entire
`
`amount
`
`of $104,812.50
`
`paid
`
`under
`
`the Agreement
`
`to date.
`
`WHEREFORE,
`
`Suprina
`
`demands
`
`judgment
`
`against
`
`Cedar
`
`Lakes
`
`as follows:
`
`(i)
`
`of Action,
`on the First
`Cause
`than
`believed
`to be no less
`
`damages
`
`in an amount
`
`to be determined
`
`at
`
`trial,
`
`but
`
`$104,812.50;
`
`in
`
`an amount
`
`determined
`
`at
`
`(ii)
`
`(iii)
`
`(iv)
`
`(v)
`
`(vi)
`
`on
`but
`
`Second
`the
`believed
`
`of Action,
`Cause
`than
`to be no less
`
`damages
`
`$104,812.50;
`
`to be
`
`trial,
`
`of Action,
`on the Third
`Cause
`than
`believed
`to be no less
`
`damages
`
`in an amount
`
`to be determined
`
`at
`
`trial,
`
`but
`
`$104,812.50;
`
`on the Fourth
`Cause
`under
`Agreement
`the
`Suprina
`the
`entire
`
`a declaration
`of Action,
`that
`and
`is
`excused,
`of $104,812.50
`amount
`paid
`
`that
`Cedar
`under
`
`obligation
`Suprina's
`is
`obligated
`Lakes
`the Agreement
`
`to perform
`to
`refund
`to date;
`
`pre-judgment
`disbursements
`
`interest,
`of
`this
`
`attorneys'
`
`action;
`
`and
`
`fees,
`
`if
`
`appropriate,
`
`and
`
`the
`
`costs
`
`and
`
`such
`
`other
`
`and
`
`further
`
`relief
`
`as the Court
`
`deems
`
`just
`
`and
`
`proper.
`
`Dated:
`
`Uniondale,
`30,
`
`July
`
`New York
`2020
`
`FARRELL
`
`FRITZ,
`
`P.C.
`
`_ PQ Bardtolo1neau
`
`By:
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Kathryn
`Cole
`Bartholomew
`Paige
`for
`Attorneys
`Suprina
`Dalton
`400 RXR Plaza
`NY 11556-3826
`Uniondale,
`227-0700
`
`(516)
`
`FF\9616885.6
`
`12
`
`13 of 14
`
`

`

`FILED: SUFFOLK COUNTY CLERK 07/30/2020 10:25 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 1
`
`INDEX NO. 609765/2020
`
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/30/2020
`
`_VERIFICATION
`
`ss:
`
`) )
`
`)
`
`STATE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`COUNTY
`
`OF SUFFOLK
`
`DALTON
`
`SUPRINA,
`
`being
`
`duly
`
`sworn,
`
`dnoses
`
`and says:
`
`I am the Plaintiffin
`
`the within
`
`action.
`
`I have
`
`read
`
`the foregoing
`
`Verified
`
`Complaint
`
`and
`
`know
`
`the contents
`
`thereof.
`
`The
`
`contents
`
`are true
`
`to my
`
`own
`
`knowledge,
`
`except
`
`as to matters
`
`stated
`
`upon
`
`information
`
`and
`
`belief,
`
`and
`
`as to
`
`those matters,
`
`I believe
`
`them
`
`to be true.
`
`Dalto
`
`pnna
`
`Sworn
`
`30_lay
`
`to before
`of
`
`July,
`
`me this
`2020
`
`No
`
`15ubl
`
`Notmy
`
`JOHN C. STEllAKIS
`Public, State of NewVot
`No, 02ST6381033
`Qualified
`in Suffolk County
`July3,20
`Commission
`Expires
`
`3"="3""FF\9631443.1"""FF\9631443.1
`
`14 of 14
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket