throbber
FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 07/20/2018 11:08 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/20/2018
`
`INDEX NO. 50551/2013
`
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`
`OF THE
`COURT
`OF WESTCHEESTER
`
`STATE
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`Index
`
`No.
`
`50551/2013
`
`ANTHONY
`
`DALLI
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`-agaiñst-
`
`NOTICE
`
`OF ENTRY
`
`WESTCHESTER
`TRANSPORTATION
`
`COUNTY
`OF
`DEPARTMENT
`and ANTHONY
`MASSARO,
`
`JR.
`
`Defendant.
`
`That
`
`the within
`
`is a true
`
`copy
`
`of
`
`the ORDER
`
`signed
`
`on
`
`July
`
`19,
`
`2018
`
`and
`
`entered
`
`in the
`
`office
`
`of
`
`the
`
`clerk
`
`of
`
`the within
`
`ñamed
`
`Court
`
`on July
`
`20,
`
`2018.
`
`Dated:
`
`Queens,
`
`July
`
`20,
`
`New York
`2018
`
`Yours
`
`etc.,
`
`To:
`
`Beach,
`
`Harris
`Joseph
`
`PLLC
`Esq.
`
`Phelan,
`P. Chafizadeh,
`Darius
`Avenue
`445 Hamilton
`NY 10601
`White
`
`Esq.
`Suite
`
`Plains,
`
`Esq.
`
`ArthÊ
`
`A.G.
`3119
`
`G. Trakas,
`P.C.
`Trakas,
`Newtown
`Avenue,
`NY 11103
`Astoria,
`(718)718-721-7171
`
`Suite
`
`500
`
`1206
`
`1
`
`1 of 10
`
`

`

`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 07/20/2018 11:08 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/20/2018
`
`INDEX NO. 50551/2013
`
`NYSCEF
`
`DOC.
`
`NO.
`
`7 6
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`07 /19/2018
`
`.
`
`for app.eals as of right
`the statutorytime
`To commence
`you are advised to serve a copy
`(CPLR 5513[a]),
`order, with notice of entry, upon all parties.
`ofthis
`
`SUPREME
`COUNTY
`
`OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
`COURT
`OF WESTCHESTER
`
`ANTHONY
`
`DALLI,
`
`-against-
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`WESTCHESTER
`TRANSPORTATION
`
`OF
`DEPARTMENT
`COUNTY
`and ANTHONY
`MASSARO,
`
`Defendants.
`
`JR.,
`
`x
`
`RUDERMAN,
`
`J.
`
`DECISION
`Motion
`Index
`
`and ORDER
`Sequence
`No.
`2
`No.
`50551/2013
`
`The
`
`following
`
`papers
`
`were
`
`concidered
`
`in connection
`
`with def±w
`
`post-trial
`
`motion
`
`pursuant
`
`to CPLR 4404(a)
`
`for
`
`an order
`
`setting
`
`aside
`
`the jury
`
`verdict
`
`as to liability
`
`and damages,
`
`and
`
`granting
`
`judgment
`
`for
`
`defendant,
`
`or directing
`
`a new trial,
`
`or
`
`reducing
`
`the jury's
`
`damages
`
`award
`
`as excessive
`
`and contrary
`
`to the weight
`
`of
`
`the evidence,
`
`or,
`
`in the alternative,
`
`setting
`
`this
`
`matter
`
`down
`
`for
`
`a cellateral
`
`source
`
`and related
`
`relief:
`
`hearing
`
`Papers
`Affirmation
`to Show
`Order
`Cause,
`Affirmation
`in Opposition,
`Affirmation
`
`Reply
`
`Exhibits
`Supplemental
`
`A - S
`Affirmation
`
`in Opposition'
`
`Numbered
`
`1
`2
`3
`
`.
`
`.
`
`This
`
`action
`
`arose
`
`out
`
`of an accident
`
`that
`
`occurred
`
`on August
`
`16, 2011
`
`in which
`
`plaintiff
`
`was
`
`struck
`
`by a Liberty
`
`Lines
`
`bus driven
`
`by defendant
`
`Anthony
`
`Massaro,
`
`Jr.
`
`It was
`
`plaintif
`
`s
`
`paedon
`
`that
`
`at
`
`the time
`
`of
`
`the accident,
`
`while
`
`he was working
`
`within
`
`a cordoned-off
`
`work
`
`area
`
`' Plaintiffs
`"Supplemental
`and =+==d-d
`schedule
`of any perceptible
`prejudice
`
`agreed-on
`absence
`
`Affirmation
`
`in Opposition
`will
`be accepted
`pracedures,
`to defendan+¼.
`
`"
`
`submitted
`while
`and considered
`
`in violation
`this Court
`
`by
`
`the
`of
`in the
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`1 of
`
`8
`
`.
`
`2 of 10
`
`.
`
`..
`
`- ..
`
`..
`
`.
`
`-
`
`....--._...
`
`-.
`
`..-..
`
`

`

`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 07/20/2018 11:08 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/20/2018
`
`INDEX NO. 50551/2013
`
`NYSCEF
`
`DOC.
`
`NO.
`
`76
`
`.
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`07/19/2018
`
`on Jemme
`
`Avenue
`
`near
`
`208th
`
`Street
`
`in the Bronx,
`
`a portion
`
`of
`
`defendants'
`
`bus
`
`entered
`
`the work
`
`area and struck
`
`him,
`
`knocking
`
`him down
`
`and casing
`
`injuries.
`
`Defendants
`
`took
`
`the position
`
`that
`
`Massaro
`
`was
`
`not
`
`negligent,
`
`and that
`
`the accident
`
`was
`
`caused
`
`when
`
`plaintiff
`
`unknowingly
`
`backed
`
`. into
`
`the street
`
`outside
`
`the cordoned-off
`
`area, where
`
`he was
`
`struck
`
`by the bus.
`
`The
`
`jury
`
`found
`
`that
`
`Massaro
`
`was
`
`negligent
`
`and that
`
`defendants
`
`were
`
`90% liable,
`
`while
`
`plaintiff
`
`was
`
`10% liable.
`
`In the damages
`
`portion
`
`of
`
`the trial,
`
`phiwiff
`
`presented
`
`his own
`
`tesdmony
`
`and that
`
`of his
`
`Dr..David
`
`of his claim
`
`that
`
`he suffered
`
`chronic
`
`treating
`
`physician,
`
`Zelefsky,
`
`in support
`
`back
`
`and neck
`
`injuries
`
`as a result
`
`of
`
`the accidentcHe
`
`also
`
`described
`
`that
`
`on December
`
`shoulder,
`
`14, 2014
`
`he experienced
`
`an exacerbation
`
`of his original
`
`back
`
`injury,
`
`such
`
`that
`
`he became
`
`unable
`
`to
`

`
`comi==a
`
`working
`
`as he had up to that
`
`date.
`
`Defendants
`
`presented
`
`as witnesses
`
`orthopedist
`
`Dr.
`
`John Buckner
`
`and neurologist
`
`Dr, Adam
`
`Bender
`
`who
`
`testified
`
`as to their
`
`opinions
`
`that
`
`the
`
`accident
`
`had not
`
`caused
`
`plaintiff
`
`any
`
`significant
`
`physical
`
`injuries.
`
`The jury
`
`award
`
`in plaintiff's
`
`favor
`
`was
`
`as follows:
`
`past medical
`expenses
`past
`lost
`earnings
`. past
`and suffering
`pain
`future
`lost
`earnings
`future
`pain
`and
`
`suffering
`TOTAL
`
`65,500.00
`$
`207,500.00
`$
`·213,000.00
`$
`960,000.00
`$
`634,800.00
`$
`$2,080,800.002
`
`Defendants
`
`now move
`
`to set aside
`
`the verdicts.
`
`(for
`(for
`
`16 years)
`34 years)
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`2Defendants'
`
`for plaintiff's
`the award
`pain
`and suffering
`award
`than
`$2,080,800.
`rather
`
`papers
`moving
`past medical
`was
`$634,500
`
`have
`reported!the
`incorrectly
`rather
`expenses
`was $65,000
`rather
`$634,800,!and
`than
`
`verdict
`than
`that
`
`amounts:
`$65,500,
`the total
`
`state
`that
`they
`that
`the future
`is $2,079,500
`
`2
`
`.
`
`3 of 10
`
`

`

`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 07/20/2018 11:08 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/20/2018
`· INDEX
`NO.
`
`(FILED
`NYSCEF
`
`: WESTCHESTER
`DOC.
`NO.
`76
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`07 / 20 / 2018.
`
`09
`
`: 43
`
`-Aly
`
`INDEX NO. 50551/2013
`
`50551/2013
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`07/19/2018
`
`.
`
`The
`
`Liability
`
`Verdict
`
`DiSCuSSiOn
`
`Turning
`
`first
`
`to the liability
`
`verdict,
`
`it was
`
`not against
`
`the weight
`
`of
`
`the evidence,
`
`of
`
`verdict
`when
`the evidence
`to the weight
`is contrary
`"A jury
`could
`the verdict
`the movant
`that
`of
`in favor
`so preponderates
`evidence
`Whether
`of
`the evidence.
`interpretation
`fair
`been
`on any
`a jury
`reached
`not
`should
`to the weight
`be set aside
`as contrary
`the evidence
`of
`does
`question
`of
`rather
`but
`requires
`a discretionary
`of many
`law,
`balancing
`We accord
`deference
`to the credibility
`deter---4W±ns
`of
`the factfinders,
`the witnesses"
`to see and hear
`the opportunity
`
`the
`have
`not
`verdict
`involve
`factors.
`who
`
`a
`
`had
`
`(Peterson
`
`v MTA,
`
`155 AD3d
`
`795,
`
`798
`
`[2d Dept
`
`2017]).
`
`.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`and two
`
`of his
`
`co-workers,
`
`John Delligatti
`
`and Jesus Garcia
`
`te=*ined
`
`that
`
`.
`
`defendants'
`
`bus
`
`swerved
`
`into
`
`the area
`
`in which
`
`plaintiff
`
`was working,
`
`which
`
`area was marked
`
`traffic
`
`cones,
`
`and
`
`struck
`
`plaintiff
`
`within
`
`that
`
`area.
`
`Another
`
`eyewitness,
`
`Bart
`
`Xhackli,
`
`te*ined
`
`defendants'
`
`case that
`
`it was
`
`plaintiff
`
`who
`
`backed
`
`into
`
`the bus's
`
`path while
`
`it was within
`
`the
`
`by
`
`on
`
`roadway.
`
`While
`
`defendants
`
`challenged
`
`the credibility
`
`of plaintifFs
`
`witnesses
`
`and empha.cized
`
`,
`
`the elishility
`
`of
`
`the neutral
`
`eyewitness
`
`in support
`
`of
`
`their
`
`argument
`
`that
`
`plaintiff
`
`was
`
`actually
`
`cutside
`
`the marked-off
`
`area when
`
`the bus
`
`struck
`
`him,
`
`"[i]ssues
`
`of credibility
`
`are for
`
`the jury,
`
`.
`
`.
`
`which
`
`had the opportunity
`
`to observe
`
`the witnesses
`
`and the evidence[,]
`
`[and]
`
`[i]ts
`
`resolution
`
`is
`
`entitled
`
`to
`
`deference"
`
`(Cicola
`
`v County
`
`ofSuffolk,
`
`120 AD3d
`
`1379,
`
`1382
`
`[2d Dept
`
`2014]),
`
`quoting
`
`Lalla
`
`v Connolly,
`
`17 AD3d
`
`322,
`
`323
`
`[2d Dept
`
`2005]).
`
`Defendmate'
`
`arguments
`
`do not
`
`justify
`
`a rejection
`
`by this Court
`
`of
`
`the testimony
`
`of plaintiff
`
`and his
`
`co-workers
`
`as a matter
`
`of
`
`law;
`
`nor may
`
`it be said
`
`that
`
`the liability
`
`verdict
`
`could
`
`not have
`
`been
`
`reached
`
`on any
`
`fair
`
`interpretation
`
`of
`
`the evidence.
`
`There.
`
`is no merit
`
`to defendants'
`
`other
`
`arguments
`
`ch±!!enging
`
`the
`
`liability
`
`verdict.
`
`3
`
`3 of
`
`8
`
`4 of 10
`
`

`

`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 07/20/2018 11:08 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/20/2018

`INDEX
`NO.
`50551/2013
`: WESTCHESTER
`DOC. NO.
`76
`
`IFILED
`NYSCEF
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`07720/201
`
`INDEX NO. 50551/2013
`
`09:
`
`43
`
`AN|
`. RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`07/19/2.018
`
`Damages
`
`Verdict
`
`.
`
`The
`
`verdict
`
`in favor
`
`of plaintiff
`
`on damages
`
`was
`
`supp
`
`rted
`
`by plaintiff's
`
`teeimony
`
`and
`
`.
`
`that
`
`of his
`
`treating
`
`physician,
`
`Dr. David
`
`Zelefsky.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`testified
`
`regarding.his
`
`injuries,
`
`the
`
`treatments
`
`he underwent
`
`and the pain
`
`he experienced;
`
`Zelefsky
`
`introduced
`
`and
`
`explened
`
`medical
`
`records
`
`regarding
`
`plaintiff's
`
`testing,
`
`diagriosis
`
`and treatment
`
`Several
`
`of
`
`defendants'
`
`chahnees
`
`verdict
`
`are related
`
`to plaintiff's
`
`claim
`
`to the damages
`
`that
`
`his original
`
`injuries
`
`caused
`
`by the subject
`
`accident
`
`were
`
`e acerbated
`
`or ar,g.vated
`
`while
`
`he
`
`.
`
`was working
`
`on December
`
`14, 2014,
`
`after which
`
`he became
`
`unable
`
`to work
`
`at all. Dd
`
`eñ±
`
`that
`
`this was
`
`actually
`
`a new injury
`
`caused
`
`by a subse
`
`luent
`
`accident,
`
`for which
`
`plaintiff
`
`is not
`
`entitled
`
`to any
`
`damages
`
`here.
`
`Defendants
`
`contend
`
`that
`
`plaintiff
`
`should
`
`have
`
`been
`
`pracluded
`
`from making
`
`a claim
`
`at
`
`trial
`
`for
`
`an award
`
`of damages
`
`for
`
`the period
`
`after
`
`the Decemb
`
`relying.on
`
`the
`
`.
`
`r 14, 2014
`
`incident,
`
`decision
`
`and order
`
`issued
`
`in this
`
`case on October
`
`24, 2017
`
`(Jo,an
`
`Lefkowitz,
`
`J.), denying
`
`plaintiff's
`
`=-½=
`
`to strike
`
`the note
`
`of
`
`issue
`
`in order
`
`to permit
`
`additiand
`
`discovery.
`
`However,
`
`that
`
`decision
`
`and order
`
`explained
`
`that
`
`plaintiff
`
`had failed
`
`to e tablish
`
`that
`
`unusual
`
`or
`
`.
`
`unanticipated
`
`circrÄnces
`
`had
`
`arisen
`
`since.the
`
`note
`
`of
`
`issuelwas
`
`filed,
`
`justifying
`
`a need
`
`for
`
`further
`
`discovery.
`
`Nothing
`
`in the lañg-:age
`
`of
`
`that
`
`order
`
`precl
`
`ded plaintiff
`
`from clai±g
`
`that
`
`damages
`
`for
`
`his
`
`injury
`
`was
`
`exacerbated
`
`or aggravated
`
`on December
`
`14, 2014,
`
`or
`
`from seeking
`
`pain
`
`and suffering
`
`and lost
`
`earnings,
`
`for
`
`the period
`
`after Dece
`
`Iber.14,
`
`2014.
`
`Defendants
`
`alsö
`
`rely
`
`on a deter-
`
`::tian
`
`of
`
`the Social
`
`Security
`
`Administation
`
`dated
`
`-
`
`December
`
`5, 2017,
`
`which
`
`determinatics
`
`was
`
`not
`
`received
`
`in evidence,
`
`in.which
`
`the agency
`
`found
`
`that
`
`plaintiff
`
`has been
`
`disabled,
`
`for purposes
`
`of
`
`the Social
`
`Security
`
`Act
`
`sectics
`
`216(i)
`
`and
`
`.
`
`4
`
`.
`
`.
`
`4 of
`
`8
`
`5 of 10
`
`

`

`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 07/20/2018 11:08 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/20/2018
`
`INDEX NO. 50551/2013
`
`NYSCEF
`
`DOC.
`
`NO.
`
`76
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`07/19./2018
`
`223(d),
`
`since December
`
`12, 20143.
`
`That
`
`deter¬in=tion
`
`specifically
`
`acknowledged
`
`that
`
`plaintiff
`
`was
`
`initially
`
`injured
`
`in April
`
`2011
`
`when
`
`he was
`
`struck
`
`by a vehicle
`
`in the course
`
`of his
`
`.-
`
`employment,
`
`but had been.able
`
`to return
`
`to work
`
`before
`
`being
`
`reinjured
`
`on December
`
`12, 2014.
`
`It does
`
`not
`
`find
`
`that
`
`the December
`
`12, 2014
`
`injury
`
`is a new injury
`
`restiting
`
`from a separate
`
`.
`
`t
`
`.
`
`rather
`
`than
`
`a
`
`aggravation
`
`o·f
`
`injuries.
`
`E en if
`
`accident,
`
`.
`
`.
`
`the original
`
`the agency
`
`had so found,
`
`plaintiff
`
`would
`
`not
`
`be pree!üded
`
`from claiming
`
`ds:ps
`
`for
`
`tlie period
`
`after December
`
`12, 2014
`
`based
`
`on the application
`
`of
`
`the doctrine
`
`of co
`
`==1 estoppel,)since
`
`defendant
`
`has
`
`failed
`
`to
`
`establish
`
`that
`
`the issue
`
`decided
`
`in the agency
`
`proceeding
`
`was
`
`identical
`
`to that
`
`presented
`
`in the
`
`personal
`
`injury
`
`action
`
`(see Auqui
`
`v Seven
`
`Thirty
`
`One Ltd. Partnership,
`
`22 NY3d
`
`246,
`
`255
`
`.
`
`.
`
`[2013])
`
`.
`
`.
`
`..
`
`.
`
`.
`
`coateñd
`
`a awed
`
`without
`
`Defendants
`
`next
`
`that Dr. Zelefsky
`
`was
`
`improperly
`
`to testify
`
`MRI
`
`films
`
`in evidencei
`
`This
`
`contention
`
`is built
`
`on a false
`
`pre nise.
`
`Review
`
`of
`
`the trial
`
`transcript
`
`confirms
`
`that
`
`the MRI
`
`films
`
`were
`
`admitted
`
`in evidence
`
`(see
`
`Defendants'
`
`Exhibit
`
`B, Trial
`
`Transcript
`
`at 175).
`
`It
`
`is worth
`
`noting
`
`that
`
`ddandants'
`
`medical
`
`experts
`
`also
`
`testified
`
`with
`
`respect
`
`to the MRIs.
`
`Accordingly,
`
`Wagman
`
`v Bradshaw
`
`(292
`
`AD2d
`
`Ó4, 87 [2d Dept
`
`2002]),
`
`upon
`
`defendants
`
`not
`
`require
`
`the yerdict
`
`The Court
`
`there
`
`ordered
`
`a
`
`which
`
`rely,
`
`does
`
`setting
`
`aside
`
`here:
`
`new trial
`
`on the issue
`
`of damages
`
`because
`
`"[t]he
`
`plaintiff
`
`was
`
`.. allowed
`
`to place
`
`iri evidence,
`
`by
`
`way
`
`of
`
`the treating
`
`chiropractor,
`
`a subjective
`
`interpretation
`
`of
`
`{unproduced]
`
`MRI
`
`films,
`
`from an
`
`inadmissible
`
`report
`
`written
`
`by a nontestifying
`
`healthcare
`
`prof
`
`ssional"
`
`(id
`
`at.86).
`
`While
`
`defcñdañts.challenged
`
`Zelefsky's
`
`expertise,
`
`the doctor
`
`was
`
`properly
`
`permitted
`
`to
`
`5 The SSA determi==tion
`refers
`on D~·ember
`that
`it occurred
`is immaterial.
`
`testified
`
`discrepancy
`
`to the reinjury
`date as pecem
`14, 2014.
`the Court
`However,
`
`r 12, 2014,
`concludes
`
`plaintiff
`while
`that
`the minor
`
`.
`
`.
`
`5
`
`.5 of
`
`8
`
`6 of 10
`
`

`

`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 07/20/2018 11:08 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/20/2018
`FILED:
`WESTCHESTER
`INDEX
`NO..
`50551/2013
`NYSCEF
`DOC.
`NO.
`76
`
`0 9:
`
`43
`
`AN|
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`07/19/2018
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`07/20/2018
`
`INDEX NO. 50551/2013
`
`testify,
`
`and the jury
`
`was
`
`entitled
`
`to credit
`
`his opinions
`
`as it saw fit.
`
`With
`
`regard
`
`to plaintiff's
`
`lost
`
`earnings
`
`award,
`
`da'^··'^-"
`
`protest
`
`that
`
`the evidence
`
`was
`
`.
`
`insufficient
`
`to establish
`
`those
`
`claims
`
`in the absence
`
`of an expert
`
`ecenemist.
`
`However,
`
`daS=d==+•
`
`acknowledge
`
`that
`
`a plaintiff's
`
`burden
`
`of proving
`
`past
`
`and
`
`future
`
`lost
`
`earnings
`
`may
`
`be
`
`accesp!i±ed
`
`with
`
`evidence
`
`such
`
`as tax
`
`returns
`
`and W-2s
`
`(see Karwacki
`
`v Astoria
`
`Med
`
`Anesthesia
`
`[2d Dept
`
`Assoc.,
`
`P.C.,
`
`23 AD3d
`
`438
`
`2005]).
`
`Plaintiff's
`
`showing
`
`on that
`
`issue was
`
`supported
`
`by his W-2s
`
`and tax
`
`records,
`
`=·bmined
`
`in evidence,
`
`and his.testimony
`
`regarding
`
`missed
`
`months
`
`of work
`
`after
`
`the subject
`
`accident.
`
`Defe
`
`dants
`
`have
`
`not
`
`provided
`
`authority
`
`for
`
`.
`
`their
`
`suggestion
`
`that
`
`it
`
`is necessary
`
`to provide
`
`the testimony
`
`of an economist.
`
`Nor
`
`is there
`
`a lack
`
`of evidence
`
`linking
`
`his
`
`injuries
`
`to his
`
`inability
`
`to work.
`
`.
`
`To be entitled
`
`to an award
`
`of daiñages
`
`for past medical
`
`expe=•es,
`
`a plaintiff
`
`must
`
`submit
`
`for
`
`past medical
`
`expenses
`
`is
`
`medical
`
`bills;
`
`in the absence
`
`of such
`
`proof,
`
`an award
`
`of damages
`
`unsupported
`
`by competent
`
`evidence
`
`(see O'Connor
`
`v Rosenbla::,
`
`276 AD2d
`
`610,
`
`611
`
`[2d Dept
`
`2000]).
`
`The
`
`evidence
`
`of plaintiff's
`
`past medical
`
`expenses
`
`consisted
`
`solely
`
`of his
`
`testimony
`
`that
`
`he received
`
`medical
`
`bills
`
`for
`
`his
`
`treatment
`
`as a result
`
`of
`
`this
`
`accident,
`
`totaling
`
`$66,000.
`
`Aaa==H=gly,
`
`the claim
`
`was
`
`unsupported
`
`by competent
`
`evidence,
`
`and that
`
`aspect
`
`of
`
`the jury
`
`verdict
`
`must
`
`be vacated.
`
`Finally,
`
`daS=d==+s
`
`contend
`
`that
`
`the verdict
`
`for past
`
`pain
`
`of $213,000
`
`and
`
`.
`
`and suffering
`
`future
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering
`
`of $634,800
`
`for
`
`34 years
`
`is excessive.
`
`This
`
`Court
`
`is not
`
`convinced
`
`that
`
`plaintiff's
`
`injuries
`
`are comparable
`
`to the
`
`cases
`
`cited
`
`by
`
`defendants,
`
`such
`
`as the rinird!y
`
`displaced
`
`clavicle
`
`fracture
`
`and nondi•placed
`
`hip
`
`fracture
`
`in
`
`Perone
`
`v City
`
`of New York
`
`(86 AD3d
`
`600
`
`[2d Dept
`
`2011]),
`
`where
`
`an award
`
`of $115,000
`
`for
`
`.
`
`.
`
`future
`
`pain
`
`and suffering
`
`was
`
`reduced
`
`to $30,000.
`
`Nor
`
`is this matter
`
`comparable
`
`to Nichols
`
`v
`
`6
`
`........
`
`..
`
`6 of
`
`8
`
`7 of 10
`
`. ..
`
`

`

`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 07/20/2018 11:08 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/20/2018
`.
`INDEX
`NO.
`50551/2013
`ILED:
`WESTCHESTER
`NYSCEF
`DOC.
`76
`NO.
`
`09:
`
`43
`
`AN|
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`07/19/2018
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`07/20/2018
`
`INDEX NO. 50551/2013
`
`C&F
`
`Trading
`
`Co.
`
`(107 AD3d
`
`769
`
`[2d Dept
`
`2013]),
`
`which
`
`upheld
`
`an award
`
`of $100,000
`
`for
`
`future
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering
`
`relating
`
`to a shesider
`
`injury.
`
`In'
`
`McEachin
`
`v City
`
`of New York
`
`(137
`
`AD3d
`
`753,
`
`754
`
`[2d Dept
`
`2016]),
`
`the plaintiff
`
`was diagnosed
`
`with
`
`low back
`
`pain
`
`secondazy
`
`to
`
`low lumbar
`
`post-traumatic
`
`pathology
`
`and lower
`
`radicalspathy,
`
`and an implanted
`
`spinal
`
`cord
`
`.
`
`but
`
`not
`
`climinate
`
`the Court
`
`reduced
`
`the past
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`st -
`
`etor
`
`reduced
`
`did
`
`the pain,
`
`suffering
`
`award
`
`from $600,000
`
`to $400,000,
`
`and the future
`
`pain
`
`and suffering
`
`award
`
`from
`
`$500,000
`
`to
`
`$350,000.
`
`.
`
`Of greater
`
`relevance
`
`is Peterson
`
`v MTA (155 AD3d
`
`795,
`
`798
`
`[2d Dept
`
`2017]),
`
`where
`
`the
`
`Court
`
`upheld
`
`an award
`
`of past
`
`pain
`
`and suffering
`
`of $800,000
`
`and reduced
`
`the award
`
`for
`
`future
`
`pain
`
`and suffering
`
`from $1,500,000
`
`to $800,000,
`
`where
`
`the plair-tiff
`
`sustained
`
`injuries
`
`to both
`
`of
`
`her
`
`sh~3dem
`
`and her
`
`lower
`
`back;
`
`and continued
`
`to experience
`
`intense
`
`pain
`
`and did
`
`not
`
`regain
`
`and physical
`
`therapy..
`
`full
`
`range
`
`of motion
`
`in either
`
`sheülder,
`
`even
`
`after
`
`surgery
`
`Here,
`
`plaintiff
`
`sustained
`
`injuries
`
`to his shoulders
`
`and discs
`
`in his
`
`luinhar
`
`and cervical
`
`spine,
`
`which,
`
`despite
`
`treatment
`
`and medication,
`
`continue
`
`to cause
`
`him pain
`
`and to limit
`
`his
`
`range
`
`of motion,
`
`and prevent
`
`him from engaging
`
`in the normal
`
`activities
`
`of his pre-accident
`
`life,
`
`such
`
`as working
`
`on his house,
`
`hiking,
`
`and fishing.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`In is apparent
`
`from the jury's
`
`notes,
`
`and from almost
`
`two
`
`full
`
`days
`
`it
`
`took
`
`to reach
`
`iti
`
`.
`
`.
`
`that
`
`took
`
`particular
`
`care with
`
`its calculation
`
`of each
`
`aspect
`
`of
`
`its
`
`verdict
`
`on damages,
`
`the jury
`
`award.· When
`
`it began
`
`its deliberations
`
`midday
`
`on December
`
`18, 2017
`
`it
`
`first
`
`asked
`
`for
`
`all
`
`the
`
`exhibits,
`
`then
`
`for plaintiff's
`
`employment
`
`records.
`
`The
`
`next morning
`
`it asked
`
`for
`
`a calculator.
`
`It
`
`asked
`
`for
`
`a read-back
`
`of certain
`
`testimony,
`
`including
`
`plaintiff's
`
`testimony
`
`regarding
`
`the hours
`
`he
`
`worked.
`
`Given
`
`plaintiff's
`
`evidence
`
`regarding
`
`his
`
`injuries,
`
`and his testimony
`
`regarding
`
`the pain
`
`they
`
`caused,
`
`the awards
`
`of $213,000
`
`for past
`
`pain
`
`and suffering
`
`and $634,800
`
`for
`
`future
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`7
`
`7 of
`
`8
`
`8 of 10
`
`

`

`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 07/20/2018 11:08 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/20/2018
`INDEX
`NO.
`50551/2013
`: WESTCHESTER
`DOC.
`NO.
`76
`
`INDEX NO. 50551/2013
`
`ANG
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`07/19/2018
`
`IFILED
`NYSCEF
`
`COUNTY
`
`CLERK
`
`07/20/2018
`
`09 : 43
`
`suffering
`
`initially,
`
`appear
`
`to be commananzate
`
`with
`
`the level
`
`of pain
`
`plaintiff
`
`subjectively.experienced
`
`the length
`
`of
`
`time
`
`he will
`
`have
`
`to endure
`
`it, and the possibility
`
`of
`
`its tapering
`
`off
`
`over
`
`time.
`
`It
`
`is not
`
`excessive.
`
`The Collateral
`
`Source
`
`Issue
`
`.
`
`With
`
`regard
`
`to
`
`defend-ts'
`
`claim that
`
`they
`
`are eñtitled
`
`to discovery
`
`on the issue
`
`of
`
`of
`
`for plaintiff's
`
`economic
`
`fallswad
`
`collateral
`
`sources
`
`recovery
`
`losses,
`
`by a hearing
`
`on the issue,
`
`plaintiff's
`
`only
`
`response
`
`is that
`
`defendan's
`
`should
`
`not
`
`have
`
`included
`
`that
`
`request
`
`for
`
`relief
`
`within
`
`the present
`
`motion.
`
`No opposition
`
`on the merits
`
`is offered.
`
`Accordingly,
`
`since
`
`the relief
`
`appears
`
`to be appropriate
`
`(see Firmes
`
`v Chase Mañhat:ân
`
`Automotive
`
`Finance
`
`Corp.,
`
`50 AD3d
`
`18 [2d
`
`Dept
`
`2008]),
`
`defendants'
`
`mouen
`
`is granted
`
`to that extent.
`
`Defendants
`
`shall
`
`serve
`
`on ;!±tiff
`
`a
`
`to which
`
`plaintiff
`
`s compliance
`
`danand
`
`for
`
`the discovery
`
`they
`
`are entitled,
`
`and following
`
`therewith,
`
`a hearing
`
`will
`
`be held
`
`before
`
`this Court
`
`on September
`
`14, 2018
`
`at 9:30
`
`a.m.
`
`to
`
`determine
`
`the amount,
`
`if any,
`
`by which
`
`the damages
`
`verdict
`
`should
`
`be reduced.
`
`Based
`
`upon
`
`the foregoing,
`
`it
`
`is hereby,
`
`ORDERED
`
`that
`
`defendants'
`
`motion
`
`to set aside
`
`the verdict
`
`is granted
`
`to the extent
`
`that
`
`the jury's
`
`award
`
`for
`
`past medical
`
`expanses
`
`is vacated,
`
`and is otherwise
`
`denied;
`
`and
`
`it
`
`is further
`
`ORnEPED
`
`defendants'
`
`that
`
`the branch
`
`of
`
`motion
`
`seeking
`
`a collateral
`
`source
`
`hearing
`
`is
`
`granted,
`
`and the parties
`
`are directed
`
`to appear
`
`before
`
`this Court
`
`on September
`
`14, 2018
`
`at 9:30
`
`a.m.
`
`for a hearing
`
`to determine
`
`the amount,
`
`if any,
`
`by which
`
`the damages
`
`verdict
`
`should
`
`be
`
`reduced.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`This
`
`constitutes
`
`the Decision
`
`and Order
`
`of
`
`the Court.
`
`Dated: White
`
`Plains,
`
`July
`
`New York
`, 2018
`
`HON.
`
`T
`
`JAN
`
`DERMAN,
`
`J.S.C.
`
`8
`
`8 of
`
`8
`
`9 of 10
`
`

`

`INDEX NO. 50551/2013
`
`Index
`
`No.:
`
`50551/2013
`
`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 07/20/2018 11:08 AM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 77
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 07/20/2018
`OF THE STATE
`SUPREME
`COURT
`OF NEW YORK
`COUNTY
`
`NEW YORK
`
`ANTHONY
`
`DALLI
`
`Plaintiff(s),
`
`-against-
`
`WESTCHESTER
`OF TRANSPORTATION
`ANTHONY
`MASSARO
`
`COUNTY
`
`and
`JR.
`
`Defendant.
`
`DEPARTMENT
`
`NOTICE
`
`OF ENTRY
`
`ARTHUR
`
`G. TRAKAS,
`
`ESQ.
`
`A.G.
`
`TRAKAS,
`
`PC
`
`Attorney
`Newtown
`
`31-19
`
`for:
`
`Plaintiff
`
`Avenue,
`
`Suite
`
`500
`
`Astoria,
`
`NY 11102
`
`Tel:
`
`Fax:
`
`(718)
`
`(718)
`
`721-7171
`
`204-2310
`
`led that,
`I certif
`circumstances,
`(c) of section
`
`to the best of my kñüw|édgé,
`the presentation
`this paper
`of
`130-1.1
`the Rules
`the Chief
`
`of
`
`of
`
`and
`information
`the con=eakms
`or
`Administrator
`
`formed
`belief
`herein
`are
`
`after
`not
`
`an inquiry
`frivolou:
`
`reasonable
`as defined
`
`under
`in subsection
`
`the
`
`Service
`Dated:
`
`of a copy
`
`of
`
`the within
`, 2011
`
`is hereby
`
`admitted
`
`SIR:-PLEASE
`
`TAKE
`
`NOTICE
`
`ARTHE
`
`G. TRARAS,
`
`ESQ.
`
`Attorney
`
`for Defcñdonis
`
`Notice
`That
`named
`
`o f Entry
`the within
`Court
`
`on
`
`is a (certified)
`
`true
`
`copy
`
`of a
`
`entered
`
`in the ofice
`
`the clerk
`
`of
`
`the within
`
`of
`
`10 of 10
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket