throbber
INDEX NO. 51356/2014
`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 08/07/2019 05:16 PM
`NY SCEF
`DOC . NO.
`405
`07/30/2019
`RECE IVE D NY SCE F:
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 412
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/07/2019
`
`Exhibit
`
`6
`
`

`

`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 08/07/2019 05:16 PM
`N
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 412
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/07/2019
`INDEX
`NO.
`51356/2014
`NYSCEF:·
`
`NYSCEF
`
`DOC.
`
`NO.
`
`2 6
`
`RECEIVED
`
`04/12/2019
`
`INDEX NO. 51356/2014
`
`To ccmmcr.cc
`the 30-d ay statutcry
`for appeals as of right under CPLR 5513 (a), you are advised
`time period
`this order, with notice
`a copy of
`of entry, upon all parties.
`
`to serve
`
`SUPREME
`OF THE STATE
`COURT
`OF WESTCHESTER
`COUNTY
`------=-----=,.--..---..-_........----------------X
`C L C Jr.
`Infant
`by his Mother
`SYLVIA
`
`REEN,
`
`and Natural
`
`Guardian
`
`OF NEW YORK
`
`.
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`.
`
`.
`
`-against-
`
`Index
`Motion
`Amended
`
`51356/14
`No.
`Seq. Nos.
`Decision
`
`.
`
`009
`008,
`and Onior
`
`MEDICAL
`WESTCHESTER
`KESSLER
`MD, GEETHA
`ADVAN
`ED OB/GYN
`
`CENTER,
`RAJENDRAN
`
`MICHAEL
`
`MD,
`
`ASSOCIATES,
`
`..........--..-....--.....-.........-----
`
`EVERETT,
`
`J.
`
`Defendants.
`
`...-...........X
`
`papers
`following
`ce of Motion/Affirmation
`R ply Affirmation/Exhibit
`
`were
`
`read
`
`on the motions:
`in Support/Exhibits
`D (does
`
`281-282)
`
`A-C
`
`(does
`
`261-
`
`265)
`
`Notice
`
`Reply
`
`of Motion/Affirmation
`Affirmation/Exhibit
`
`in Support/Exhibit
`A (does
`
`279-280)
`
`A (does
`
`268-270)
`
`Affirmation
`
`in Opp
`
`(doc
`
`276)
`
`.
`
`IÖthis
`
`action
`
`sounding
`
`in medical
`
`malpractice,
`
`defendant
`
`Westchester
`
`Medical
`
`Center
`
`under
`
`motion
`
`sequence
`
`number
`
`(WMC)
`
`1hoves,
`
`008,
`
`for an order,
`
`pursuant
`
`to CPLR 4404
`
`(a),
`
`granting
`
`the following
`
`relief:
`
`(1)
`
`setting
`
`aside
`
`the jury's
`
`verdict
`
`in favor
`
`of plaintiff
`
`and
`
`directing
`
`judgment
`
`in favor
`
`of WMC;
`
`or
`
`(2)
`
`setting
`
`aside
`
`the jury's
`
`verdict
`
`in favor
`
`of plaintiff
`
`and
`
`disccting|a
`
`new trial
`
`on all
`
`issues;
`
`(3)
`
`setting
`
`aside
`
`the jury's
`
`verdict
`
`in favor
`
`of plaintiff
`
`and
`
`directing
`
`new trial
`
`on the
`
`issue
`
`of damages,
`
`unless
`
`plaintiff
`
`stipulates
`
`to a substantial
`
`reduction·
`
`of
`
`the jury's
`
`awards;
`
`and
`
`(4)
`
`granting
`
`a hearing,
`
`pursuant
`
`to CPLR 4545,
`
`4546
`
`and
`
`50-A,
`
`for
`
`the
`
`!
`
`

`

`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 08/07/2019 05:16 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 412
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/07/2019
`2019
`
`INDEX NO. 51356/2014
`
`NYSCEF
`
`DOC.
`
`NO.
`
`286
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`04/12/2019
`
`purpose
`
`of
`
`identifying
`
`collateral
`
`sources
`
`and structuring
`
`a judgment;
`
`and
`
`(5) declaring
`
`that
`
`any
`
`judgment
`
`entered
`
`reflect
`
`that
`
`portion
`
`of
`
`the award
`
`that
`
`provides
`
`for
`
`future
`
`medical
`
`expenses
`
`to
`
`be paid
`
`in acco2dance
`
`with
`
`Public
`
`Health
`
`Law
`
`§§ 2999-g
`
`through
`
`2999-j.
`
`Defendants
`
`Michael
`
`Kessler,
`
`M.D.
`
`(Kessler),
`
`Geetha
`
`Rajendran,
`
`M.D.
`
`(Rajendran)
`
`and Advanced
`
`Ob/Gyn
`
`Associates
`
`(Advanced
`
`move,
`
`under
`
`motion
`
`sequence
`
`number
`
`for
`
`orders,
`
`pursuant
`
`to
`
`Ob/Gyn)
`
`jointly
`
`009,
`
`CPLR
`
`4404
`
`(a),
`
`5031
`
`and
`
`5501,
`
`granting
`
`the following
`
`relief:
`
`(1)
`
`setting
`
`aside
`
`the jury's
`
`verdict
`
`and awarding
`
`judgment
`
`to defendants
`
`as a matter
`
`of
`
`law,
`
`or directing
`
`a new trial
`
`on the
`
`ground
`
`that
`
`the ver,dict
`
`was
`
`not
`
`based
`
`on a rational
`
`view
`
`of
`
`the evidence,
`
`or was
`
`contrary
`
`to the weight
`
`of
`
`the evidence;
`
`or
`
`(2)
`
`setting
`
`aside
`
`the jury's
`
`verdict
`
`and
`
`directing
`
`a new trial;
`
`or
`
`(3)
`
`conditionally
`
`reduciñg
`
`the awards
`
`for
`
`past
`
`and
`
`future
`
`pain
`
`because
`
`they
`
`deviate
`
`materially
`
`from
`
`and suffering
`
`what would
`
`be reasonable
`
`compensation;
`
`and (4) granting
`
`a hearing,
`
`pursuant
`
`to CPLR 4545,
`
`4546
`
`and 50-A,
`
`for
`
`the purpose
`
`of
`
`identifying
`
`collateral
`
`sources
`
`and
`
`structuring
`
`a judgment;
`
`(5) declaring
`
`that
`
`any judgment
`
`entered
`
`reflect
`
`that
`
`portion
`
`of
`
`the
`
`award
`
`that
`
`provides
`
`for
`
`future
`
`medical
`
`expenses
`
`to be paid
`
`in accordance
`
`with
`
`Public
`
`Health
`
`Law
`
`§§ 2999-g
`
`through
`
`2999-j;
`
`and (6)
`
`staying
`
`the
`
`entry
`
`ofjudgment
`
`pending
`
`a decision
`
`on this motion
`
`and
`
`a hearing
`
`to
`
`determine
`
`the proper
`
`calculation
`
`of
`
`the judgment
`
`under
`
`CPLR 5031.
`
`The motions,
`
`under motion
`
`.
`
`seqüêñce
`
`numbers
`
`008
`
`and
`
`009,
`
`are consolidated
`
`for disposition
`
`and
`
`upon
`
`the foregoing
`
`papers,
`
`the motions
`
`are decided
`
`as set
`
`forth
`
`below.
`
`The
`
`theory
`
`of plaintiff's
`
`case
`
`is that
`
`the proximate
`
`cause
`
`of her
`
`son's
`
`preterm
`
`delivery
`
`and
`
`permanent
`
`preterm
`
`birth
`
`related
`
`injuries
`
`and
`
`deficits
`
`were
`
`Kessler
`
`and/or
`
`Rajendran's
`
`respective
`
`departures
`
`from accepted
`
`medical
`
`practice
`
`by their
`
`failures
`
`to offer
`
`a cerclage
`
`to address
`
`her
`
`cervical
`
`insufficiency
`
`during
`
`any
`
`of her
`
`three
`
`hospital
`
`visits
`
`and/or
`
`admissions
`
`in July
`
`2010.
`
`2
`
`2 of
`
`14
`
`

`

`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 08/07/2019 05:16 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 412
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/07/2019
`
`INDEX NO. 51356/2014
`
`NYSCEF
`
`DOC.
`
`NO.
`
`286
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`04/12/2019
`
`Plaintiff
`
`seeks
`-
`
`to hold WMC vicariously
`
`liable
`
`for
`
`the negligent
`
`.
`
`acts
`
`and/or
`
`amissions
`
`of
`
`the
`
`defendant
`
`physicians.
`
`.
`
`The
`
`case was
`
`tried
`
`before
`
`a jury.
`
`During
`
`the
`
`course
`
`of
`
`the
`
`trial,
`
`the parties
`
`produced
`
`evidence
`
`relating
`
`to the
`
`central.iisues
`
`of:
`
`(1) whether
`
`Rajendran
`
`departed·from
`
`aõcepted
`
`medical
`
`practice
`
`by failing
`
`to offer
`
`plaintiff
`
`Sylvia
`
`Green
`
`(Green)
`
`a cerclage
`
`d'uring
`
`the July
`
`9-10
`
`adiñission;
`
`(2) wh^ether
`
`Kessler
`
`departed
`
`from acóepted
`
`medical
`
`practice
`
`by
`
`failing
`
`to timely
`
`obtain
`
`a rnaternal
`
`fetal mediciñe
`
`(MFM)
`
`consult
`
`during
`
`the July
`
`13-1.41tdmission
`
`and
`
`during
`
`the
`
`15-16
`
`such
`
`departures
`
`were
`
`the proximate
`
`cause
`
`of
`
`the preterm
`
`July
`
`admission;
`
`(3) whether
`
`delivery
`
`dfplaintiff's
`
`son at 24 weeks
`
`gestation,
`
`and his
`
`related
`
`injuries
`
`and
`
`deficits;
`
`and
`
`(4)
`
`whether
`
`Green
`
`reasonably
`
`believed,
`
`based
`
`on the words
`
`or conduct
`
`of WMC,
`
`that Rajendran
`
`and
`
`Kessler
`
`were
`
`employees/sgents
`
`of WMC,
`
`and accepted.their
`
`services
`
`ir:
`
`reliance
`
`on the perceived
`
`.
`
`relationsÑip,
`
`and not.in.reliance
`
`upon
`
`the
`
`skill
`
`of Rajendtan
`
`and Kesslbr.
`
`The
`
`jury's
`
`verdict,
`
`as
`
`recorded·in
`
`the extract
`
`of May
`
`17, 2013,
`
`provides
`
`in relevant
`
`part:
`
`departed
`
`- Rajendran
`from
`her
`2010
`9-10,
`July
`of
`the infant
`plaintiffs
`
`during
`cause
`
`practice
`and
`
`by not
`that
`such
`
`offering
`departure
`
`Oreen
`was
`
`a cerclage
`a proximate
`
`accepted
`
`admission,
`itýuries.
`
`- Kessler
`consult
`departure
`
`from
`departed
`Green's
`a proxiifiate
`
`during
`was
`
`accepted
`
`July
`
`13-14,
`cause
`
`to timely
`practice
`by failing
`2010
`and
`admianians,
`15-16,
`plaintiff's.injuries.
`the infant
`
`of
`
`.
`
`obtain
`and
`
`a MFM
`that
`such
`
`The jury
`
`apportioned
`
`fault
`
`to Rajendran
`
`and Kessler
`
`equallÿ.
`
`- Greert
`_Rajendran
`their
`services
`and WMC,
`
`believed,
`reasonably
`were
`and Kessler
`in reliance
`upon
`in reliance
`and not
`
`on the words
`based
`or agents'of
`employees
`the perceived
`upon
`their
`
`of WMC,
`that
`or conduct
`she accêpted
`that
`and
`WMC,
`physicians
`between
`these
`relationship
`as physicians.
`skills
`
`.
`
`3
`
`.
`3 of
`
`14
`
`

`

`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 08/07/2019 05:16 PM
`LOC.
`T.3CLE
`405.
`NO.
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 412
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/07/2019
`
`INDEX NO. 51356/2014
`
`NYSCEF
`
`DQC.
`
`NO.
`
`286
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`04/12/2019
`
`The jury
`
`Awarded:
`
`.
`
`$5 million
`
`for
`
`past
`
`pain
`
`and suffering;
`
`$15 million
`
`for
`
`future
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering
`
`for
`
`69 years;
`
`Future
`on July
`
`lost
`
`earnings
`
`in an annual
`
`amount
`
`of $113,000
`
`for
`
`39 years
`
`commencing
`
`1, 2032;
`
`Home
`
`care
`
`(until
`
`age 21)
`
`in the annual
`
`amount
`
`of $54,000
`
`for
`
`13.17
`
`years;
`
`Residential/Home
`56 years;
`
`care
`
`(starting
`.
`
`at age 21)
`
`in the annual
`
`amount
`
`of $163,199
`
`for
`
`Physical
`
`therapy
`
`in the annual
`
`amount
`
`of $13,104
`
`for
`
`13.17
`
`years;
`
`Occupational
`
`therapy
`
`in the annual
`
`amount
`
`of $17,004
`
`for
`
`13.17
`
`years;
`
`Speech
`
`therapy
`
`in the annual
`
`amount
`
`of $17,784
`
`for
`
`13.17
`
`years.
`
`defendants'
`
`As
`
`to
`
`contentions
`
`that
`
`the verdict
`
`should
`
`be set aside
`
`because
`
`it was
`
`not
`
`based
`
`on a rational
`
`view
`
`of
`
`the evidence,
`
`or was
`
`contrary
`
`to the weight
`
`of
`
`the
`
`evidence,
`
`it
`
`is well
`
`settled
`
`that:
`
`"a jury
`
`verdict
`
`should
`
`not
`
`be set aside
`
`as contrary
`
`to the weight
`
`of
`
`the
`
`evidence
`
`unless
`
`the
`
`jury
`
`could
`
`not have
`
`reached
`
`the verdict
`
`by any
`
`fair
`
`interpretation•
`
`evidence"
`
`of
`
`the
`
`( Victoria
`
`H.
`
`v
`
`Board
`
`of Educ.
`
`of City
`
`of N.Y.,
`
`129 AD3d
`
`912,
`
`912
`
`[2d Dept
`
`2015]
`
`[internal
`
`quotation
`
`marks
`
`and
`
`citations
`
`omitted]).
`
`Furthermore:
`
`a court
`is not
`a jury
`law that
`of
`as a matter
`to conclude
`supported
`verdict
`evidence
`.
`line
`conclude
`no valid
`is simply
`that
`there
`first
`. . [it.must]
`which
`could
`and
`permissible
`lead
`rational
`inferences
`reasoning
`possibly
`the evidence
`to the conclusion
`of
`on the basis
`reached
`by the jury
`presented
`criteria
`to be applied
`are essentially
`trial.
`The
`this
`assessment
`in making
`It
`principle
`is a basic
`a verdict.
`required
`of a Trial
`Judge
`asked
`to direct
`case where
`the right
`of
`trial
`be correctly
`said
`in any
`law that
`it cannot
`court
`of
`that
`the
`exists
`and the
`evidence
`presents
`an actual
`issue
`fact,
`that
`the
`case
`in which
`it can be said
`a verdict,
`in any
`direct
`Similarly,
`to reach
`the
`result
`for
`irrational
`a jury
`such
`that
`it would
`not
`be utterly
`
`by
`of
`
`[people]
`at
`those
`of our
`
`by jury
`may
`properly
`evidence
`it has
`
`is
`
`"[fjor
`sufficient
`

`
`.
`
`...
`
`..
`
`---
`
`4
`
`4 of
`
`14
`
`

`

`-----
`INDEX NO. 51356/2014
`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 08/07/2019 05:16 PM
`...---
`-..--
`-
`..--
`--....
`.
`.
`.., -,
`.
`--..
`-
`-
`,,....,
`-
`-
`.
`.
`,
`....,
`lemmi-seé----
`/3
`19
`1: E
`.
`EF:
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 412
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/07/2019
`
`.NYSCEF
`
`DOC.
`
`NO.
`
`286
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`04/12/2019
`
`determined
`conclude
`
`and
`upon,
`the verdict
`that
`
`thus
`
`gikestion
`a valid
`is as a matter
`of
`
`of
`fact
`law not
`
`does
`
`exist,
`supported-by
`
`the
`the
`
`court
`may
`evidence"
`
`not
`
`.(Cohen
`
`v Hallmark
`
`Cards,
`
`45 NY2d
`
`493,
`
`499
`
`[1978]
`
`[internal
`
`quotation
`
`marks
`
`and
`
`citations
`
`.
`
`omitted]).
`
`Having
`
`presided
`
`at
`
`the trial,
`
`and upon
`
`review
`
`of
`
`the evidence
`
`in conjuñction
`
`with
`
`the
`
`instant
`
`motions,
`
`the Court
`
`finds
`
`that
`
`the jury's
`
`verdict
`
`on liability
`
`was
`
`neither
`
`against
`
`the weight
`
`it
`
`of
`
`the evidence,
`
`nor was
`
`inconsistent
`
`with
`
`a fair
`
`interpretation
`
`of
`
`the
`
`evideñee.
`
`In
`
`circumstances
`
`such
`
`as this,
`
`"[w]here
`
`...
`
`. conflicting
`
`expert
`
`testimony
`
`is presented,
`
`the jury
`
`is
`
`entitled
`
`to accept
`
`one expert's
`
`opinion
`
`and r.eject
`
`that
`
`of another
`
`expert"
`
`(Ferreira
`
`v Wyckoff
`
`Hgts. Med.
`
`Ctr.,
`
`81 AD3d
`
`587,
`
`588
`
`[2d Dept
`
`201 1]).
`
`To find,
`
`as defendants
`
`ask,
`
`that
`
`the jury's
`
`verdict
`
`was
`
`uns.üpported
`
`or against
`
`the weight
`
`of
`
`the evidence
`
`presented,
`
`would.requi
`
`re the Court
`
`experts
`
`were
`
`to find
`
`that
`
`plaintiff's
`
`not worthy
`
`of belief.
`
`This
`
`Court,
`
`having
`
`heard
`
`the evidence,
`
`is not willing
`
`to make
`
`that
`
`finding
`
`(see Loughman
`
`v Flint
`
`Co.,
`
`i32 AD2d
`
`507,
`
`510
`
`[1s Dept
`
`.
`
`1987]).
`
`As
`
`to those
`
`aspects
`
`of
`
`the
`
`consolidated·motions
`
`which
`
`seek
`
`a reduction
`
`of
`
`the jury's
`
`awards
`
`on the ground
`
`that
`
`the
`
`awards
`
`for
`
`past
`
`pain
`
`and suffering
`
`($5 million),
`
`future
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`($15
`
`million
`
`over
`
`earnings
`
`($113,000
`
`for
`
`and
`
`future
`
`medical
`
`suffering
`
`69.years),
`
`lost
`
`39 years)
`
`expenses
`
`(as broken
`
`down
`
`above)
`
`are e.-casive,
`
`the motÏon
`
`is resolved
`
`as follows.
`
`In New York,."[t]he
`
`ambunt
`
`of damages
`
`to be awarded
`
`to a plaintiff
`
`for
`
`personal
`
`injuries
`
`is a question
`
`for
`
`the jury,
`
`and.its
`
`determination
`
`will
`
`not
`
`be disturbed
`
`dnless
`
`the
`
`award
`
`deviates
`
`materially
`
`from
`
`what
`
`would
`
`be reasonable
`
`compensation"
`
`(Peterson
`
`v MTA,
`
`155 AD3d
`
`795,
`
`798
`
`[2nd Dept
`
`2017]),
`
`and
`
`"[t]he
`
`reasohableness
`
`of compensation
`
`must
`
`be measured
`
`against
`
`relevant
`
`5
`
`5 of
`
`14
`
`

`

`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 08/07/2019 05:16 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 412
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/07/2019
`1ÎD
`NO.
`0
`51356/
`
`INDEX NO. 51356/2014
`
`NYSCEF
`
`DOC.
`
`NO.
`
`28 6
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF :
`
`04/12/2019
`
`precedent
`
`of comparable
`
`cases"
`
`(Halsey
`
`v New York
`
`City
`
`Tr. Auth.,
`
`114'AD3d
`
`726,
`
`727
`
`[2014]
`
`[internal
`
`quotation
`
`marks
`
`and
`
`citations
`
`omitted]).
`
`.
`
`In Sence
`
`v Atoynatan
`
`(142 AD3d
`
`600
`
`[2d Dept.2016])f
`
`a medical
`
`itialpractice
`
`case cited
`
`by both
`
`plaintiff
`
`and
`
`defendants
`
`involved
`
`a large
`
`jury
`
`verdict,
`
`including
`
`$4 million
`
`for past
`
`pain
`
`and suffering
`
`and
`
`$7,015,000for
`
`future
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering.
`
`The
`
`case
`
`centered
`
`on evidence
`
`that
`
`of
`
`an infant
`
`sustained
`
`severe
`
`and
`
`penadnent
`
`brain
`
`damage,
`
`with
`
`related
`
`deficits,
`
`as a result
`
`the
`
`defendants'
`
`deviations
`
`from
`
`accepted
`
`standards
`
`of medical
`
`care. On Áppeal,
`
`the Appellate
`
`Division,'Second
`
`Department,
`
`finding
`
`that
`
`the
`
`award·for.past
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering
`
`deviated
`
`materially
`
`from
`
`what
`
`would
`
`be reasonable
`
`compensedon,
`
`modified
`
`the
`
`entered
`
`judgment,
`
`and
`
`directed
`
`the parties
`
`to stipulate
`
`to reducing
`
`the amo.unt
`
`to $2 million
`
`within
`
`a given
`
`perio'd
`
`of
`
`absence
`
`of
`
`such
`
`the matter
`
`to trial
`
`for
`
`a new trial
`
`on
`
`time,
`
`and-in
`
`the
`
`stipulatics,
`
`remitting
`
`damages
`
`on the
`
`question
`
`of past
`
`pain
`
`and suffering.
`
`court
`
`.
`
`While
`
`plaintiff
`
`cites
`
`to a series
`
`of cases which
`
`precede
`
`Sence
`
`by not
`
`less
`
`than
`
`10 years,
`
`and prior*to
`
`the creation
`
`of
`
`the New York
`
`Medical
`
`Indemnity
`
`Fund
`
`(MIF)
`
`in 201 1, defendants
`
`point
`
`to Reilly
`
`v St. Charles
`
`Hosp.
`
`& Rehabilitation
`
`Center
`
`(143 AD3d
`
`692
`
`[2d
`
`pept
`
`2016]),'
`
`another
`
`medical
`
`malpractice
`
`action
`
`involving
`
`a jury
`
`finding
`
`of
`
`liability
`
`for
`
`the
`
`severe
`
`birth-related
`
`was
`
`the
`
`neurological
`
`injuries
`
`sustained
`
`by an infant
`
`plaintiff.
`
`The Reilly
`
`appeal
`
`decided·by
`
`Appellate
`
`Division,
`
`Second
`
`Department
`
`approximately
`
`two months
`
`after
`
`Sence,
`
`albeit
`
`by a
`
`•.
`
`different
`
`panel,
`
`In its decision,
`
`the Appellate
`
`Court
`
`held,
`
`in relevant
`
`part,
`
`that
`
`the awards
`
`for
`
`past
`
`and future
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering
`
`($10 million
`
`past,
`
`and
`
`$82,5
`
`rÃillion
`
`future,
`
`for
`
`a total
`
`of $92.5
`
`.
`
`' Plaintiff
`cites
`Reilly
`verdict
`that
`the jury's
`malpractice
`medical
`
`v St. Charles
`action
`in this
`case involving
`
`showing
`another
`
`Hokp.
`is not
`a severe
`
`injury
`
`& Rehabilitation
`line with.the
`of
`out
`jury
`sustained
`brain
`
`Center
`
`purpose
`rendered
`
`of
`
`in
`
`the
`for
`verdict
`at birth.
`
`6
`
`6 of
`
`14
`
`

`

`INDEX NO. 51356/2014
`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 08/07/2019 05:16 PM
`__
`nor.
`NO.
`YSCEF
`07/30/2019
`NYSCEF:
`FFrFTVFD
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 412
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/07/2019
`405,
`51356/2014
`INDEX
`NO.
`.
`
`NYSCHF
`
`DOC.
`
`NO,
`
`206
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`04/12/2019
`
`million)
`
`Were
`
`excessive
`
`and
`
`deviated
`
`materially
`
`from what
`
`would
`
`be reasañabla
`
`cornpensation.
`
`After
`
`downward
`
`modification,
`
`the
`
`awards
`
`came
`
`to $750,000
`
`past
`
`and
`
`$3.5 mMrm future
`
`for
`
`a
`
`total
`
`of $4,250,000.
`
`Defendants
`
`argue
`
`that,
`
`beeë±e
`
`the neurologic
`
`injuries
`
`sustained
`
`by the
`
`instant
`
`infant
`
`plaintiff1ire
`
`less
`
`severe
`
`than
`
`those
`
`sustaiñed
`
`by the Reilly
`
`infant
`
`plaintiff,
`
`the
`
`da:nages
`
`awards
`
`must
`
`be reduced
`
`to a commensurate
`
`level.
`
`sustained
`
`infant
`
`in this
`
`In view
`
`of
`
`the
`
`nature
`
`and extent
`
`of
`
`the injuries
`
`by
`
`the
`
`action,
`
`and
`
`upon
`
`compãrises
`
`to the pain
`
`and
`
`suffering
`
`awards
`
`rendered
`
`in this
`
`action
`
`to the
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering
`
`awards
`
`rendered
`
`in other
`
`recent
`
`medical
`
`malpractice
`
`cases
`
`involving
`
`infants
`
`who
`
`sustained
`
`brain
`
`injury
`
`at birth,
`
`the Court
`
`finds
`
`that
`
`the
`
`awards
`
`of $5 million
`
`(past)
`
`and
`
`$15
`
`million
`
`(future)
`
`materially
`
`deviate
`
`from what
`
`would
`
`be considered
`
`reasonable
`
`compense+ion
`
`(see
`
`.
`
`v New York
`
`(2d
`
`Halsey
`
`City
`
`Tr. Auth.;
`
`Quijano
`
`v American
`
`Tr.
`
`Ins. Co.,
`
`155 AD3d
`
`981,
`
`983-984
`
`Dept
`
`2017]).
`
`It
`
`is suggested
`
`that
`
`the parties
`
`consider
`
`stipulating
`
`to reducing
`
`the awards
`
`to $2
`
`million
`
`for
`
`past
`
`pain
`
`and suffering
`
`and
`
`$7 million
`
`for
`
`future
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering,
`
`sums
`
`which
`
`would
`
`be more
`
`reasonable
`
`in light
`
`of other
`
`similar
`
`medical
`
`malpractice
`
`actions.,
`
`As
`
`to the jury's
`
`award
`
`for
`
`future
`
`lost
`
`earning,
`
`defendants'
`
`motions
`
`are denied,
`
`as the
`
`evidence
`
`presented
`
`schstar,tial
`
`who
`
`did
`
`by plaintiff's
`
`expert
`
`was
`
`and compelling,
`
`and
`
`defendants,
`
`.
`
`not offer
`
`an expert
`
`to address
`
`this
`
`issue,
`
`failed
`
`to adequately
`
`refute
`
`plaintiff's
`
`evidence.
`
`The motions
`
`to set aside
`
`the belæee
`
`of
`
`the jury
`
`award
`
`are also
`
`denied,
`
`as the
`
`aweuà,
`
`to the
`
`extent
`
`they
`
`are not
`
`reduced
`
`by virtue
`
`of
`
`the
`
`MIF,'
`
`which
`
`provides
`
`funds
`
`for
`
`future
`
`health
`
`care
`
`.
`
`paid
`

`
`Assuming
`the MIF,
`out of
`
`plaintiff
`rather
`
`qualifies
`than
`
`by
`
`the MIF,
`for
`the defêñdants,
`
`to the extent
`their
`payout
`
`his
`will
`
`future
`medical
`be reduced.
`
`expenses
`
`are
`
`.
`
`7
`
`7 of
`
`14
`
`

`

`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 08/07/2019 05:16 PM
`NY
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 412
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/07/2019
`
`INDEX NO. 51356/2014
`
`NYSCEF
`
`DOC.
`
`NO.
`
`286
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF
`
`:
`
`04/12/2019
`
`.
`
`costs
`
`asscciated
`
`with
`
`birth-related.neurological
`
`injuries
`
`resulting
`
`from medical
`
`malpractice,
`
`are
`
`supported
`
`iyy the
`
`evidence.
`
`Regarding
`
`the jury's
`
`finding
`
`agaiñst WMC on the
`
`questian
`
`of vicarious
`
`liability,
`
`it
`
`is well
`
`settled
`
`that
`
`a medical
`
`facility,
`
`such
`
`as WMC, may
`
`be held
`
`liable,
`
`under
`
`the theory
`
`of vicarious
`
`liability,
`
`for
`
`the
`
`negligent
`
`acts
`
`or omissions
`
`of
`
`its employees,
`
`but
`
`not
`
`those
`
`of
`
`independent
`
`who
`
`am not
`
`It
`
`a hospital
`
`or medical
`
`contractors/physicians
`
`in its employ.
`
`is also well
`
`settled
`
`that
`
`.
`
`facility
`
`(a principal)
`
`can,
`
`under
`
`the theory
`
`of apparent
`
`agency,
`
`and under
`
`certain
`
`circumstances,
`
`be held
`
`li'able
`
`for
`
`the negugeñt
`
`acts
`
`or on'issions
`
`of
`
`independent
`
`contractors/physicians
`
`who
`
`are
`
`not
`
`in its employ
`
`(see Hill
`
`v St. Clare's
`
`Hosp.,
`
`67 NY2d
`
`72,
`
`79-81
`
`[1986]).
`
`"Èssentisi
`
`to the
`
`creation
`
`of apparent
`
`authority
`
`are words
`
`or cõñduct
`
`of
`
`the principal,
`
`communicated
`
`to a third
`
`party,
`
`that
`
`give
`
`rise
`
`to the appearance
`
`and
`
`belief
`
`that
`
`the
`
`agent
`
`possesses
`
`authority''
`
`of
`
`to act on behalf
`
`the
`
`principal
`
`(Hallock
`
`v State
`
`ofNew
`
`York,
`
`64 NY2d
`
`224,
`
`231
`
`[1984];
`
`see Merrell-Benco
`
`Agency,
`
`LLC v HSBC Bank
`
`USA.
`
`20 AD3d
`
`605,
`
`608
`
`[2005),
`
`lv
`
`dismissed
`
`and
`
`denied
`
`6 NY3d
`
`742
`
`[2005]).
`
`A plaintiff
`
`seeking
`
`to hold
`
`a medical
`
`facility
`
`vicariously
`
`liable
`
`for
`
`the
`
`acts
`
`or omissions
`
`of a physician
`
`not
`
`in its employ
`
`must
`
`show
`
`that
`
`he or
`
`she reasonably
`
`relied
`
`on the
`
`appearance
`
`of authority
`
`based
`
`on "some
`
`misleading
`
`conduct
`
`on the
`
`part
`
`of
`
`the priñcipal---not
`
`agent"
`
`the
`
`(Ford
`
`see
`
`..
`
`Merrell-Benco
`
`Agency,
`
`LLC v HSBC Bank
`
`USA,
`
`supra),
`
`and
`
`that
`
`he or
`
`she accepted
`
`the
`
`services
`
`v .Unity
`
`Hosp.,
`
`32 NY2d
`
`464,
`
`473
`
`[1973];
`
`of
`
`the ostensible
`
`agent
`
`in aliance,
`
`not upon
`
`that person's
`
`skill,
`
`but
`
`based
`
`on his
`
`or ber
`
`islaticñship
`
`with
`
`the principal
`
`(see Hill
`
`v St. Clare's
`
`Hosp.,
`
`67 NY2d
`
`at 82; Nagengast
`
`v
`
`Samaritan
`
`Hosp.,
`
`21 I AD2d
`
`878,
`
`880
`
`[1995]).
`
`Únder
`
`the
`
`leading
`
`case
`
`of Mduba
`
`v Benedictine
`
`Hosp.
`
`(52 AD2d
`
`450
`
`[3d Dept
`
`1976]),
`
`the
`
`8
`
`8 of
`
`14
`
`.
`
`

`

`--
`INDEX NO. 51356/2014
`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 08/07/2019 05:16 PM
`...-
`..-
`.
`.
`-...-..,--..
`--,......
`-..-..
`-
`.
`.
`-
`.
`. -
`,
`--,
`..,
`. car
`t,cc.
`4 c
`uc.
`19
`1
`cc
`nt:D1
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 412
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/07/2019
`
`NYSCEF
`
`DOC.
`
`NO.
`
`286
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`04/12/2019
`
`appellate
`
`court
`
`addressed
`
`the question
`
`of vicarious
`
`liability,
`
`and
`
`citing
`
`the Restatement
`
`of Torts,3
`
`determined
`
`that,
`
`because
`
`the defendant
`
`hospital
`
`held
`
`itself
`
`out
`
`to the public
`
`as a facility
`
`that
`
`furnishes
`
`doctors,
`
`staff
`
`and
`
`facilities
`
`for
`
`emergency
`
`treatment,
`
`it was:
`
`"under
`of
`those
`
`Certainly,
`satisfactory
`
`a duty
`services
`those
`to perform
`and staff
`doctom
`services
`the
`by
`the person
`who
`himself
`avails
`treatment
`from
`any personnel
`
`performance
`for
`the negligent
`and is liable
`to {the
`plaintiff].
`furrdshed
`and
`it hired
`to expect
`a right
`facilities
`has
`of hospital
`hospital"
`are furnished
`who
`the
`
`by
`
`(id.
`
`at 454).
`
`Upon
`
`a review
`
`of
`
`the
`
`evidence,
`
`the Court
`
`finds
`
`no cause
`
`to vacate
`
`the jury
`
`verdict
`
`ascribing,vicarious
`
`liability
`
`to WMC for
`
`the actions
`
`of Kessler
`
`and Rajendran.
`
`The
`
`evidence
`
`presented
`
`to the jury
`
`was
`
`that Green
`
`presented
`
`to nonparty
`
`ob/gyn
`
`Dr. Helen
`
`Hostin
`
`(Dr.
`
`Hostin)
`
`on July
`
`1, 2010,
`
`with
`
`complaints
`
`of
`
`right
`
`lower
`
`quadrant
`
`pain.
`
`Dr. Hostin
`
`referred
`
`Green
`
`to a
`
`.
`
`maternal
`
`for
`
`an ultrasound
`
`and
`
`and
`
`based
`
`on these
`
`fetal medicine
`
`(MFM)
`
`specialist
`
`evaluation,
`
`results
`
`tógether
`
`with
`
`her
`
`own
`
`examination
`
`of Green
`
`several
`
`days
`
`later
`
`on July
`
`6, 2010,
`
`Dr. Hostin
`
`admitted
`
`her
`
`to Nyack
`
`Hospital.
`
`Green
`
`was
`
`treated
`
`at Nyack
`
`Hospital
`
`until
`
`July
`
`9, 2010,
`
`when
`
`Dr. Hostin
`
`transferred
`
`her,
`
`by ambulance,
`
`to WMC,
`
`because
`
`it was
`
`better
`
`equipped
`
`to treat
`
`.
`
`Green's
`
`symptoms
`
`and
`
`a significantly
`
`premature
`
`jnfant.
`
`Ùpon
`
`her arrival
`
`at WMC,
`
`Green
`
`was
`
`seen
`
`by Rajendran,
`
`an MFM specialist.
`
`On the
`
`evening
`
`of July
`
`10, 2010,
`
`Green,
`
`who
`
`was
`
`not offered
`
`a cerclage
`
`by Rajendran,
`
`was
`
`subsequently
`
`discharged
`
`by Kessler
`
`(who
`
`did
`
`not
`
`actually
`
`see or examine
`
`her),
`
`and
`
`a staff
`
`nurse
`
`gave
`
`her an
`
`to perform
`contractor
`rendered
`services
`are being
`by
`negligence
`by the
`harm caused
`the employer
`as though
`§ 429).
`
`services
`
`were
`
`3 "One
`employs
`who
`reasonable
`the
`accepted·in
`to liability
`is subject
`to the
`such
`services,
`servants"
`(Restatement,
`
`servants,
`supplying
`or by his
`
`an independent
`belief
`that
`the
`physical
`for
`same
`extent
`Torts
`
`2d,
`
`9
`
`.
`
`9 of
`
`14
`
`are
`
`which
`another
`for
`or by his
`employer
`in
`the contractor
`them himself
`
`the
`of
`
`supplying
`
`

`

`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 08/07/2019 05:16 PM
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 412
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/07/2019
`NYSCEF
`
`DOC.
`
`NO.
`
`286
`
`INDEX NO. 51356/2014
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF
`
`:
`
`04 /12/2019
`
`appointment
`
`to see Rajendran
`
`approximately
`
`one week
`
`later.
`
`On the
`
`evening
`
`of July
`
`13, Green,
`
`who was
`
`experiencing
`
`certain
`
`sy'mptoms
`
`(some
`
`spotting/bleeding)
`
`went
`
`to WMC.
`
`She was
`
`discharged
`
`several
`
`hours
`
`later
`
`(at approximately
`
`3:30
`
`a.m.,
`
`on July
`
`14, 2010)
`
`by Kessler,
`
`who
`
`was
`
`on call,
`
`but who
`
`did
`
`not
`
`actually
`
`see or avamlhe
`
`her. On the
`
`evening
`
`of July
`
`15, 2010,
`
`Green
`
`pr‡ãcated
`
`to WMC's
`
`emergency
`
`room complaining
`
`ýf
`
`contractions
`
`and
`
`vaginal
`
`spotting.
`
`again
`
`examined
`
`and
`
`Rajendran
`
`Kessler,
`
`who was
`
`on call,
`
`her,
`
`and admitted
`
`her
`
`to labor
`
`delivery.
`
`saw Green
`
`at approximately
`
`9:00
`
`a.m.,
`
`the
`
`next morning,
`
`and
`
`spoke
`
`with
`
`her
`
`about
`
`the
`
`circusistances
`
`surrounding
`
`her preterm
`
`labor.
`
`The
`
`infant
`
`plaintiff,
`
`who
`
`was
`
`born
`
`at
`
`approximately
`
`10:40
`
`a.m.,
`
`was
`
`delivered
`
`by Kessler.
`
`WMC argues
`
`that,
`
`because
`
`the treatment
`
`Green
`
`received
`
`from
`
`Rajendran
`
`and
`
`from
`
`Kessler
`
`was
`
`initiated
`
`by her
`
`pri·vate
`
`physician,
`
`Dr. Hostini
`
`who
`
`had
`
`advised
`
`Green
`
`that
`
`she (Dr.
`
`was
`
`"colleagues"
`
`.
`
`.
`
`Hostin)
`
`going
`
`to contact
`
`her
`
`at WIúfC,
`
`the·1ogical
`
`conclusion
`
`is that Green's
`
`private
`
`physiciañ
`
`was
`
`referring
`
`1 er
`
`to private
`
`attending
`
`physicians
`
`at WMC. WMC also
`
`points
`
`to
`
`the fact
`
`that Green
`
`was
`
`given
`
`a follow-up
`
`appointm
`
`at with.Rajendran
`
`at Rajendran's
`
`off--
`
`premises
`
`office
`
`as further
`
`evidence
`
`that Green
`
`should
`
`have
`
`been
`
`aware
`
`that Rajendran
`
`was
`
`not
`
`on
`
`WMC's
`
`staff
`
`of employees.
`
`Finally, WMC argues
`
`that
`
`the
`
`inclusion
`
`of WMC's
`
`name
`
`on the
`
`lencrhead
`
`of
`
`forms
`
`provided
`
`out with
`
`respect.to
`
`the different
`
`medical
`
`services
`
`to Green
`
`to fill
`
`being
`
`provided·to
`
`her,
`
`is inadequate
`
`to establish
`
`that
`
`either
`
`Kessler'or
`
`Rajendran
`
`was
`
`acting
`
`on its
`
`behalf,
`
`sufficient
`
`to confer
`
`an agency
`
`relaticñship.
`
`Although
`
`neithar
`
`Raj.
`
`=±==
`
`nor Kessler
`
`were
`
`actually
`
`employed
`
`by WMC,
`
`the jury made
`
`a deterrr·!==Man
`
`that
`
`the
`
`c_ircum
`
`ices
`
`surrounding
`
`Green's
`
`care
`
`and treatment
`
`at WMC were
`
`sufficient
`
`to find
`
`that
`
`she could
`
`have
`
`reasonably
`
`believed
`
`that
`
`these
`
`physicians
`
`were
`
`employees
`
`or
`
`.
`
`10
`
`.
`
`10
`
`of
`
`14
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`

`

`---
`INDEX NO. 51356/2014
`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 08/07/2019 05:16 PM
`-.,--,-....-
`.....
`-
`.
`....,
`NYSCEF
`NO.
`DOC.
`405
`RECEIVED
`07/30/2019
`NYSCEF:
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 412
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/07/2019
`51356/2014
`INDEX
`NO.
`
`NYSCEF
`
`DOC.
`
`NO.
`
`286
`
`-
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`04/12/2019
`
`agents
`
`of WMC.
`
`Supporting
`
`the view
`
`that Green
`
`reasonably
`
`believed
`
`that,
`
`when
`
`she received
`
`treatment
`
`from Rajendran
`
`and Kessler,
`
`she was
`
`being
`
`treated
`
`by WMC employees,
`
`is Rajendran's
`
`!
`
`trial
`
`testiracay
`
`that:
`
`(1) when
`
`a patient
`
`comes
`
`to the hospital
`
`and needs
`
`a consult
`
`by an MFM,
`
`the MFM who
`
`attends
`
`that
`
`patient
`
`is the MFM on duty
`
`at
`
`that
`
`particular
`
`time
`
`(tr
`
`at 305);
`
`(2)
`
`she (Rajendran)
`
`was
`
`an employee
`
`of WMC (tr at 109), which
`
`she changed
`
`several
`
`days
`
`later
`
`cross
`
`was
`
`.
`
`during
`
`examination;
`
`(3)
`
`she was
`
`uncertain
`
`whether
`
`Advanced
`
`Ob/Gyn
`
`run
`
`by
`
`employees
`
`of WMC (tr at 306);
`.
`
`and
`
`(4)
`
`it was her understanding
`
`that
`
`Advanced
`
`Ob/Gyn
`
`was
`
`the
`
`faculty
`
`practice
`
`for WMC,
`
`and
`
`the teachu
`
`g faculty
`
`for
`
`the hospital
`
`(tr at 305).
`
`Kessler
`
`was also
`
`unable
`
`to state with
`
`ccitaiñty
`
`the
`
`nature
`
`ofhis
`
`relationship
`
`with WMC,
`
`testifying
`
`that Advanced
`
`Ob/Gyn
`
`was
`
`"a group
`
`created
`
`just
`
`to be,
`
`I guess,
`
`a subgroup
`
`of
`
`the
`
`hospital,"
`
`when
`
`he was
`
`asked
`
`whether
`
`of
`
`the exact
`
`between
`
`he was aware
`
`in 2010,
`
`affiliation
`
`the group
`
`and WMC (tr at 138).
`
`Moreover,
`
`Dr. Blanchette,
`
`whose
`
`pretrial
`
`deposition
`
`testimony
`
`was,
`
`in part,
`
`read
`
`into
`
`the record
`
`during
`
`trial,
`
`provided
`
`evidence
`
`about
`
`the close
`
`nature
`
`of
`
`the ralationship
`
`between WMC and the
`
`individual
`
`defendants
`
`when
`
`he acknowledged
`
`that
`
`he was,
`
`simultaneously,
`
`the
`
`director
`
`of
`
`Ob/Gyn
`
`at WMC and
`
`the director
`
`of Advanced
`
`Ob/Gyn
`
`(tr at 1052).
`
`In rendering
`
`its
`
`verdict,
`
`the jury might
`
`have
`
`also
`
`considered.the
`
`facts
`
`that:
`
`(1) Green
`
`was
`
`brought
`
`frorn
`
`Nyack
`
`was
`
`sent
`
`to WMC for
`
`the
`
`to WMC by ambulance
`
`Hospital;
`
`(2) Green
`
`specialized
`
`prenatal
`
`services
`
`it could
`
`provide,
`
`and not
`
`for
`
`treatment
`
`by any
`
`particular
`
`physician,
`
`regardless
`
`of whether
`
`Dr. Hostin
`
`told
`
`her
`
`that
`
`she was
`
`going
`
`to contact
`
`her
`
`"colleagues"
`
`at
`
`WMC;
`
`(3) when
`
`asked
`
`what
`
`her understanding
`
`was
`
`as to where
`
`the doctors
`
`who
`
`treated
`
`her were
`
`worlsing,
`
`Green
`
`stated
`
`that
`
`she believed
`
`them to be working
`
`for WMC,
`
`because
`
`that was where
`
`she was
`
`being
`
`cared
`
`for;
`
`(4) Green
`
`was
`
`treated
`
`at WMC by physicians
`
`assigned
`
`to her on the
`
`.
`
`11
`
`of
`
`14
`
`

`

`INDEX NO. 51356/2014
`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 08/07/2019 05:16 PM
`NYSCEF
`405
`NO.
`DOC.
`07/30/2019
`RECEIVED
`NYSCEF:
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 412
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/07/2019
`INDEX
`NO.
`513S6/2014
`
`NYSCEP
`
`DOC.
`
`NO.
`
`286
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`04/12/2019
`
`basis
`
`of
`
`their
`
`schedu!M
`
`~hi«s/o»
`
`call
`
`status
`
`at WMC,
`
`and
`
`not
`
`baca|~ac
`
`she
`
`chose
`
`either
`
`of
`
`them,
`
`had
`
`a prior
`
`rel~<':--.:-=-'-p
`
`with
`
`either
`
`of
`
`them,
`
`or was
`
`a private
`
`patient
`
`of either
`
`of
`
`them;
`
`(5) prior
`
`to
`
`the evening
`
`of'
`
`July
`
`15, 20l
`
`0, Green
`
`had
`
`never met Kessler,
`
`the physician
`
`who
`
`discharged
`
`her
`
`twice
`
`without
`
`ever
`
`speaking
`
`with
`
`her or exa;i;,i-..g
`
`her;
`
`(6)
`
`it was WMC staff,
`
`and not Green,
`
`that
`
`to see R —
`'aidr
`
`—
`
`kept
`
`set up the gz-=i:-..==;ant
`
`for
`
`her
`
`o6-'premises
`
`(an ~~g~i".==--=-""-='= she never
`
`because
`
`she delivered
`
`her
`
`son
`
`days
`
`before
`
`the schedL
`
`>ed e~~o! @(ment);
`
`(7)
`
`the
`
`consent
`
`forms
`
`~si-laying
`
`the WMC letterhead,
`
`which
`
`were
`
`given
`
`to Green
`
`by %1VlC
`
`staff,
`
`state
`
`t'hat Green
`
`was
`
`authorizing
`
`Rajendran
`
`and Kessl
`
`er and
`
`"associates
`
`or assistants
`
`of his/her
`
`[the
`
`i "ysician's)
`
`choice
`
`at%'est~hester
`
`Medical
`
`Center
`
`('WMC')
`
`perform"
`
`to
`
`certain
`
`procedures
`
`on her, without
`
`any expianation
`
`regarding
`
`the relationship
`
`between
`
`the facility,
`
`the treaters
`
`and
`
`the medi'cal
`
`services
`
`being
`
`authorized
`
`and provided;
`
`and (8)
`
`nei<3 er Kessler;
`
`nor Rajendran,
`
`nor WMC
`
`offered
`
`proof
`
`that
`
`they made
`
`any
`
`effort
`
`to dispel
`
`any
`
`(mis)understanding
`
`Green
`
`might
`
`have
`
`had
`
`as
`
`to the nature
`
`of
`
`their
`
`prie«i~
`
`! relationship,
`
`Based
`
`on the evidence
`
`before
`
`the jury
`
`the Court
`
`cannot
`
`find
`
`that
`
`the jury's
`
`finding
`
`of vicarious
`
`liability
`
`is against
`
`the weight
`
`of
`
`the evidence.
`
`As
`
`to that
`
`aspect
`
`of
`
`defe»d~.~'
`
`motion
`
`that
`
`seeks
`
`a misdial
`
`on the
`
`grounds
`
`of plaintiff
`
`counsel's
`
`~'...
`
`tion,
`
`the. motion
`
`is demed.
`
`To the
`
`extent
`
`the
`
`defense's
`
`bt
`
`talons were
`
`that
`
`plaintiff
`
`lrollll
`
`I Alt on the
`
`I
`
`overruled
`
`on the ground
`
`counsel's
`
`st~!en~ants
`
`constituted
`
`fair
`
`evidence,
`
`which
`
`did
`
`not exceed
`
`the wide
`
`bounds
`
`of]
`
`t! t d
`
`afforded
`
`to attorneys
`
`during
`
`'ion
`
`the Court
`
`stands
`
`by
`
`those
`
`rulings.
`
`Granted
`
`however
`
`are those
`
`aspects
`
`of
`
`defendants'
`
`motions
`
`that
`
`seek
`
`(l)
`
`a hearing
`
`pursuant
`
`to CPLR 4545,
`
`4546
`
`and Article
`
`50-A,
`
`for
`
`the
`
`puipose
`
`of
`
`identifying
`
`collateral
`
`sources
`
`and
`
`structuring
`
`a judgment;
`
`(2)
`
`aii order
`
`declaring
`
`that
`
`any„'
`
`." —...=.".'. entered
`
`reflect
`
`that
`
`portion
`
`12
`
`12
`
`of
`
`14
`
`I
`
`

`

`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 08/07/2019 05:16 PM
`-
`.....-...-
`.
`..---
`---.....--..
`-...
`,...-,......
`,..--....
`-
`.
`-
`-
`-
`.
`. -
`-
`-
`....
`,
`,
`-
`-
`07/30/2019
`NYSCEF:
`EECEIVED
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 412
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/07/2019
`INDEX
`51356/2014
`NO.
`
`INDEX NO. 51356/2014
`
`NYSCEF
`
`DOC.
`
`NO.
`
`286
`
`-
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`04/12/2019
`
`of
`
`the
`
`award
`
`that
`
`provides·for
`
`future
`
`medical
`
`expenses
`
`shall
`
`be paid
`
`in accordance
`
`with
`
`Public
`
`Health
`
`Law
`
`§§ 2999-g
`
`through
`
`2999-j.
`
`Accordingly,
`
`it
`
`is
`
`OitDERED
`
`that
`
`defendants'
`
`motions
`
`are granted
`
`to the extent
`
`that:
`
`(1) unless
`
`plaintiff
`
`files
`
`a written
`
`stipulation
`
`consenting
`
`to a specific
`
`reduction
`
`of
`
`the
`
`amount
`
`of damages
`
`for
`
`past
`
`and
`
`future
`
`pain
`
`and
`
`suffering
`
`to $2 million
`
`and
`
`$7 million
`
`respectively,
`
`within
`
`30 days
`
`of entry
`
`of
`
`this
`
`decision
`
`and
`
`order,
`
`the verdict
`
`is set aside
`
`to the
`
`extent
`
`that
`
`a new trial
`
`shall
`
`be held
`
`on the
`
`questioi
`
`of damages;
`
`shall
`
`be conducted
`
`for
`
`the purpose
`
`of
`
`collateral
`
`sources
`
`and
`
`(2) a hearing
`
`identifying
`
`structuring
`
`a judgment;
`
`and
`
`(3 with
`
`respect
`
`to any
`
`judgment
`
`entered
`
`in this
`
`action,
`
`the portion
`
`of
`
`the award
`
`that
`
`provides
`
`for
`
`future
`
`medical
`
`expenses
`
`must
`
`be paid
`
`in accordance
`
`with
`
`Public
`
`Health
`
`Law §§
`
`2999-g
`
`through
`
`2999-j,
`
`and
`
`the motions
`
`are otherwise
`
`denied;
`
`and
`
`it
`
`is further
`
`OÓERED
`
`that
`
`the
`
`parties
`
`are directed
`
`to appear
`
`in the Settlement
`
`Conference
`
`Part
`
`on
`
`Tuesday,
`
`June
`
`4, 2019
`
`at 9:15
`
`a.m.,
`
`to schedule
`
`a date
`
`for
`
`a new trial
`
`on damages
`
`and
`
`a date
`
`for
`
`a
`
`collateral
`
`source
`
`hearing.
`
`This
`
`constitutes
`
`the
`
`decision
`
`and
`
`order
`
`of
`
`the Court.
`

`
`Dated:
`
`White
`April
`
`Plains,
`12, 2019
`
`New York
`
`ENTER:
`
`HO
`
`.
`
`AVIÛ
`
`F. EVERE
`
`, J.S.C.
`
`13
`
`13
`
`of
`
`14
`
`

`

`---.-
`---....
`..----.--.-..
`--
`INDEX NO. 51356/2014
`FILED: WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK 08/07/2019 05:16 PM
`......--
`-
`.
`-
`.
`--...,
`.
`. -
`,
`....-,
`.....
`NYRPRF•
`NA
`nAr
`NY.S EF
`a A 5
`FIvFn
`DF
`07/30/2019
`NYSCEF DOC. NO. 412
`RECEIVED NYSCEF: 08/07/2019
`INDEX
`51356/2014
`NO.
`
`W-f5Clii?
`
`DOC.
`
`NO.
`
`286
`
`RECEIVED
`
`NYSCEF:
`
`04/12/2019
`
`The Fitzgerald
`Martin
`Clearwater
`Mauro
`
`Heidell,
`
`f
`
`.
`
`Lilling
`Rittoni,
`
`Naparty
`Murphy
`
`Law
`
`Firm,
`and Bell
`
`P.C.
`.
`
`& Bach
`
`14
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket