throbber
At IAS Part _ of the Supreme Court
`of the State of New York, held in and for
`the County of Westchester, at the
`Courthouse thereof, located at 111
`Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Blvd,
`White Plains, NY. on the _ day of
`July, 2017.
`
`P R E S E N T :
`
`J.S.C
`__________________________________________________________________X
`
`TERENCE O’CONNELL,
`
`-against—
`
`JDRAM J. ARIS,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`ORDER TO
`SHOW CAUSE
`
`Index No.: 69292/2014 .
`
`~~~~~———~—-—---—-—-———--------—--—~~~—~~n—--------_- --------------X
`
`Defendant.
`
`S I R S :
`
`Upon reading and filing the Affidavit of Terence O’Connell, sworn to on the 18‘:h day of
`
`July, 2017; the affirmation of JONATHAN RICE, ESQ, dated the 19th of July, 2017, the
`
`exhibits attached thereto; and upon all papers and proceedings heretofore had herein between the
`
`parties,
`
`LET, the defendant, his attorneys, agents, servants and employees or any one on their
`
`behalf show cause at IAS Part
`
`of this Court, before the Hon. Justice
`
`the County of Westchester, at 111 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Room
`
`
`
`, White Plains, NY.
`
`10601 on the
`
`day ofJuly, 2017 at 9:3 0 o'clock mm. in the forenoon of that day,
`
`WHY an Order should not be made and entered herein granting the following relief:
`
`, held in and for
`
`
`
`

`

`1. For an increase of the damages to which plaintiff Terence O’Connell is entitled
`under his claims against the defendant Joram Aris for legal fees incurred
`remedying the misconduct of Joram Aris and defending against his ongoing
`improper behavior that all stemmed from and constituted ongoing misconduct
`for which damages are permitted to be awarded to plaintiff for the amount of
`his legal fees incurred in defending against and remedying defendant’s
`misconduct.
`
`Pursuant to the June 15, 20017 order of The Hon. Orazio Beilantoni during the
`trial of this action and the stipulation of counsel for the parties on that same
`date the issue of additional legal fees incurred by plaintiff Terence O’Connell
`beyond that which the court had permitted the jury to consider (amounts over
`and above the $99,000 attributed to work completing the work of defendant
`Aris and handling related matters in the case of O’Connell v. O’Connell) was
`to be addressed and resolved by the court in a post-verdict motion if the jury
`returned a finding of entitlement to damages under Judiciary Law 487.
`
`Based upon the June 15, 20017 stipulation between counsel; the order of this
`court; and the jury verdict finding the defendant Jcram Aris culpable and liable
`to plaintiff for Judiciary Law 487 damages under bOth prongs of said statute,
`plaintiff is permitted to apply by motion for the following additional damages
`to increase the jury verdict on damages for defendant Aris’ misconduct:
`a.
`“legal fees” incurred by plaintiff prosecuting and defending the
`motions, actions and proceedings filed by defendant Joram Aris In all
`courts and actions and not just in the partition action in which defendant
`began his plethora of improper acts and practices all of which constitute
`misconduct and all of which were further acts of misconduct by
`defendant Joram Aris and were a continuation of his misconduct and
`abusive behavior that the jury found to be outrageous and reprehensible
`in their award of damages under Judiciary Law 487.
`b. Plaintiff by his own testimony and by Jonathan Rice, Esq. presented
`testimony of legal fees incurred that constituted damages in the
`following amounts:
`$144,000 (rounded down) after discounts to client
`$15,000 for trial (for 2-3 day trial and preparation)
`Total Legal Fees of $159,000
`The court however, only allowed the jury to consider legal fees of
`$99,000 testified to by plaintiff, as damages to the extent those legal
`fees were incurred only in completing the work defendant Aris was
`required to complete and defending motions in the O’Connell V.
`O’Connell case under index No. 552/2009.
`
`Based on the June 15, 2017 stipulation of counsel and directive from the
`court to have these damages considered in plaintiff’s case after the trial
`
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`by motion, plaintiff now moves to have the court consider and award the
`following additional damages for legal fees on the misconduct claims in
`this case:
`
`a. $60,000 of additional legal fees excluded by this court
`from consideration by the jury ($159,000 minus $99,000 =
`$60,000)
`b. $15,000 as an additional legal fee for completing the trial
`and filing this motion given that the plaintiff has
`consented to this increase in legal fee for work in excess
`of the work contemplated and as such work was
`reasonable, necessary and still represents a substantial
`discount from plaintiffs counsel’s normal legal fees.
`Upon award of the additional $75,000 of legal fees required due to defendant
`Aris’ misconduct in violation of Judiciary Law 487 thereby directing that the
`same be trebled consistent with the requirements of that statute ;
`
`4.
`
`5 . Directing that the clerk of the court amend the verdict of the jury in this
`regard to increase the amount of damages for misconduct and violation of
`Judiciary Law 487 from $100,000 to $174,000 and thereafter trebiing the
`same to $525,000 ;
`
`6. Directing the clerk of the court to enter judgment in the amount of $654,000
`consistent with the verdict of the jury and the order of this court and such
`additional taxable costs and any interest thereon; and
`
`7. Directing a discovery conference on the issue of discovery required for
`conduct of the punitive damages trial required herein. based on the jury
`verdict awarding punitive damages.
`
`8.
`
`Removing the “disposed” marking on this case in the efile system of the
`court as discovery and triai is still required on punitive damages issues as per
`the verdict of the jury in this case (See Exhibit G)
`
`9.
`
`For such other and further relief as is just, proper and equitable.
`
`SUFFICIENT CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, LET service of a copy of this Order
`
`to Show Cause, and the papers upon which it is based upon Robert L. Goidberg, Esq, attorney
`
`for defendant JORAM J. ARIS, at 767 Third Avenue, 24th Flr., New York, NY. 10017 by
`
`
`
`

`

`service Via the ECF filing system before the
`
`day of July, 2017, be deemed good and
`
`sufficient service.
`
`ENTER:
`
`J.S.C.
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket