throbber
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`
`
`1:17CV1037
`
`
`
`FARM LABOR ORGANIZING
`COMMITTEE, et al.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`JOSHUA STEIN,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`
`The Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed with the Court
`
`ORDER
`
`in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and, on August 18, 2021, was served on the parties in
`
`this action. (ECF Nos. 155, 156.) Defendant filed objections to the Magistrate Judge’s
`
`Recommendation, to which Plaintiffs responded, and Plaintiffs separately filed objections to
`
`the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. (See ECF Nos. 157, 159, 161.)
`
`The Court has appropriately reviewed the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation and has
`
`made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation. The
`
`Court therefore adopts the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation.
`
`IT IS THEREFORE DECLARED that the “Settlement Provision” of Section 20.5 of
`
`the Farm Act that is codified in North Carolina General Statute Section 95-79(b) and created
`
`by the text underlined below (the “Settlement Clause”):
`
`Any provision that directly or indirectly conditions the purchase of agricultural
`products, the terms of an agreement for the purchase of agricultural products,
`or the terms of an agreement not to sue or settle litigation upon an agricultural
`producer’s status as a union or nonunion employer or entry into or refusal to
`
`Case 1:17-cv-01037-LCB-LPA Document 162 Filed 09/15/21 Page 1 of 3
`
`

`

`enter into an agreement with a labor union or labor organization is invalid and
`unenforceable as against public policy in restraint of trade or commerce in the
`State of North Carolina
`
`VIOLATES the First Amendment and first-amendment-related protections of the Equal
`
`Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution.
`
`IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that:
`
`(1) Defendant, acting in his official capacity as Attorney General, and Defendant’s
`
`officers, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and those persons acting in active concert
`
`or participation with him, or under his supervision, are PERMANENTLY ENJOINED from
`
`threatening to enforce, taking any action to enforce, and/or enforcing Section 20.5 of the
`
`Farm Act insofar as it declares that any provision that directly or indirectly conditions the
`
`terms of an agreement not to sue or to settle litigation upon an agricultural producer’s status
`
`as a union or nonunion employer or entry into or refusal to enter into an agreement with a
`
`labor union or labor organization is invalid and unenforceable as against public policy in
`
`restraint of trade or commerce in the State of North Carolina;
`
`(2) Defendant SHALL assume control over and terminate any prosecutions for
`
`violation of the Settlement Clause as soon as Defendant learns of the initiation of any such
`
`prosecution; and
`
`(3) Defendant SHALL promptly provide notice and a copy of this Order to (A) his
`
`employees; (B) those under his supervision; (C) any other persons who are in active concert
`
`or participation with Defendant, his employees, or those under his supervision; and (D) the
`
`Commissioner of Labor and the district attorneys for each prosecutorial district of North
`
`Carolina as defined in North Carolina General Statute Section 7A-60(a)-(a1).
`
`Case 1:17-cv-01037-LCB-LPA Document 162 Filed 09/15/21 Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`IT IS FURTHER ORDERED
`
`that
`
`the Court’s preliminary
`
`injunction
`
`is
`
`DISSOLVED.
`
`This, the 15th day of September 2021.
`
`/s/ Loretta C. Biggs
`United States District Judge
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 1:17-cv-01037-LCB-LPA Document 162 Filed 09/15/21 Page 3 of 3
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket