`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`Paper 11
`
`Entered: March 6, 2015
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`
`
`FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`CUOZZO SPEED TECHNOLOGIES LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`____________
`
`Case IPR2014-01393
`Patent 6,778,074 B1
`____________
`
`
`Before JAMESON LEE and JOSIAH C. COCKS,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of Proceedings
`37 C.F.R. 42.5
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2014-01393
`Patent 6,778,074 B1
`
`On March 5, 2015, an initial telephone conference was held. The
`
`participants were respective counsel for the parties and Judges Lee and
`Cocks. The parties informed the Board that the Time Periods set in the
`Scheduling Order (Paper 10) do not pose any problem and need not be
`changed. Neither party contemplates filing any motion at this time. The
`Patent Owner, however, may be filing a Motion to Amend Claims at an
`appropriate time. We advised counsel for Patent Owner to confer with the
`Board at least one week prior to the filing of a Motion to Amend Claims.
`The initial conference call does not satisfy the requirement to confer with the
`Board with regard to the filing of a Motion to Amend Claims.
`
`We instructed the parties not to use a Motion to Exclude Evidence to
`address any issue concerning an alleged improper scope of a reply or reply
`evidence. Instead, if such issues arise, the parties should contact the Board
`in a joint conference call. We explained that supplemental evidence is not
`supplemental information and that there are separate rules governing each.
`
`It is ORDERED that the Time Periods set in the Scheduling Order
`dated February 9, 2015 (Paper 10) remain unchanged.
`
`
`
`2
`
`
`
`IPR2014-01393
`Patent 6,778,074 B1
`
`For PETITIONERS:
`Eric A. Buresh
`Jason Mudd
`eric.buresh@eriseip.com
`jason.mudd@eriseip.com
`
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`
`John Kasha
`john.kasha@kashalaw.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
