`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS
`AMERICA, INC., and APPLE INC.,
`Petitioners,
`
`v.
`
`ROSETTA-WIRELESS CORPORATION,
`Patent Owner.
`
`1
`Case IPR2016-00622
`Patent No. 7,149,511 B1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Before the Honorable JUSTIN T. ARBES, PATRICK R. SCANLON, and JOHN A.
`HUDALLA, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`
`
`PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. §42.70(a)
`
`
`1 Case IPR2016-00616 has been consolidated with this proceeding.
`
`
`
`Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.70(a), the Scheduling Order entered August 22,
`
`2016 (Paper 13), the Decision instituting this proceeding and consolidating
`
`IPR2016-006162 with it (Paper 15), and the Order modifying due dates entered
`
`January 24, 2017 (Paper 31), Patent Owner Rosetta-Wireless Corporation (“Patent
`
`Owner”) respectfully requests oral argument on all the instituted grounds of
`
`alleged unpatentability in IPR2016-00616 and IPR2016-0622, as listed below:
`
`References
`
`21 and 70
`22 and 71
`1–10, 19, 58–65, and 68
`2 and 59
`8 and 9
`20 and 69
`
`Basis
`Challenged Claim(s)
`1–6, 8–10, 58–63, and 65 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Kimura
`1–10, 19, 58–65, and 68
`35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Goggin
`2 and 59
`35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Goggin, Bodnar
`8 and 9
`35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Goggn, Jornada
`20 and 69
`35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Goggin, DeLorme Receiver,
`DeLorme Accessories
`35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Goggin, Ogasawara
`35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Goggin, CapShare
`35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Goggin, Proxim
`35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Goggin, Proxim, Bodnar
`35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Goggin, Proxim, Jornada
`35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Goggin, Proxim, DeLorme
`Receiver, DeLorme Accessories
`35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Goggin, Proxim, Ogasawara
`35 U.S.C. § 103(a) Goggin, Proxim, CapShare
`
`21 and 70
`22 and 71
`
`The Board has scheduled DUE DATE 7, the date of the Oral Hearing if
`
`requested, to be June 1, 2017 (Paper 31 at 3). Patent Owner respectfully requests a
`
`two-hour hearing, with 60 minutes of argument time allotted to Patent Owner
`
`individually and 60 minutes of argument time allotted to Petitioners collectively in
`
`
`2 The Decision in IPR2016-00616 is contained in Paper 11 of that proceeding.
`
`
`
`connection with the foregoing issues and proceedings. The parties have conferred
`
`and Petitioners agree to the amount and division of time for the hearing. Patent
`
`Owner further respectfully requests that the Board provide audio/visual equipment
`
`to display demonstrative exhibits and evidence of record, including a projector and
`
`screen for displaying documents.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/Miranda Y. Jones
`Miranda Y. Jones (Reg. No. 64.721)
`Michael Ng (pro hac vice)
`Daniel A. Zaheer (pro hac vice)
`Attorneys for Patent Owner
`Rosetta-Wireless Corp.
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 19, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`The undersigned certifies that pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.6(e), a copy of the
`
`foregoing PATENT OWNER’S REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT
`
`PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. §42.70(A) was served via email to lead and backup
`
`counsel of record for Petitioners as follows:
`
`Megan Raymond
`Steven Baughman
`Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
`mraymond@paulweiss.com
`sbaughman@paulweiss.com
`
`
`Brian E. Ferguson
`Anish R. Desai
`Megan H. Wantland
`Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
`Brian.Ferguson@weil.com
`Anish.Desai@weil.com
`Megan.Wantland@weil.com
`
`Richard T. McCaulley
`Andrew J. Sutton
`Ropes & Gray LLP
`Richard.McCaulley@ropesgray.com
`Andrew.Sutton@ropesgray.com
`
`By:
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: April 19, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/Miranda Jones
`Miranda Y. Jones (Reg. No. 64,721)
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`Rosetta-Wireless Corp.
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
