throbber
Paper No. 7
`
`Date Entered: September 27, 2016
`
`Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`GRACO CHILDREN’S PRODUCTS INC.,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`KOLCRAFT ENTERPRISES, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Case IPR2016-00810 (Patent D570,621 S)
`Case IPR2016-00816 (Patent D604,970 S)
`Case IPR2016-00826 (Patent D616,231 S)
`Case IPR2016-00911 (Patent 7,458,114 B2)1
`____________
`
`
`
`
`Before KEN B. BARRETT, JOSIAH C. COCKS, and JENNIFER S. BISK,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`COCKS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`
`
`ORDER
`Motion for Pro Hac Vice Admission of Raymond P. Niro, Jr.
`37 C.F.R. § 42.10
`
`
`1 This Order addresses the same matter in all four identified proceedings.
`We, therefore, exercise our discretion to issue one Order in each identified
`proceeding. The parties are not authorized to use this style heading for any
`subsequent papers.
`
`
`
`

`
`Case IPR2016-00810 (Patent D570,621 S)
`Case IPR2016-00816 (Patent D604,970 S)
`Case IPR2016-00826 (Patent D616,231 S)
`Case IPR2016-00911 (Patent 7,458,114 B2)
`
`As authorized in the Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition (Paper 3),
`
`Patent Owner, Kolcraft Enterprises Inc. (“Kolcraft”), moves for admission pro hac
`vice of Mr. Raymond P. Niro, Jr. (Papers 6 or 7, “Motion”).2&3 Petitioner, Graco
`Children’s Products Inc., filed no opposition to the Motion. The Motion is
`granted. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c); see also IPR2013-00639, Paper 7 (setting forth
`requirements for pro hac vice admission).4
`It is
`ORDERED that the Motion seeking admission pro hac vice for Raymond P.
`
`Niro, Jr. is granted;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Raymond P. Niro, Jr. is authorized to represent
`Kolcraft as back-up counsel in this proceeding;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that a registered practitioner must remain as lead
`counsel throughout the proceeding;
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Raymond P. Niro, Jr. is to comply with the
`Office Patent Trial Practice Guide and the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as
`set forth in Part 42 of the C.F.R.; and
`
`FURTHER ORDERED that Raymond P. Niro, Jr. is to be subject to the
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a), and the USPTO
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 et. seq.
`
`
`2 Kolcraft also filed a Declaration from Raymond P. Niro, Jr. in support of the
`Motion (Ex. 2001).
`3 In IPR2016-00810, IPR2016-00816, and IPR2016-00911, the Motion is Paper 6.
`In IPR2016-00826, the Motion is Paper 7.
`4 Available at http://www.uspto.gov/ip/boards/bpai/ptab_trials.jsp, “Representative
`Orders, Decisions, and Notices,” “Other Representative Orders and Decisions”).
`2
`
`
`
`

`
`Case IPR2016-00810 (Patent D570,621 S)
`Case IPR2016-00816 (Patent D604,970 S)
`Case IPR2016-00826 (Patent D616,231 S)
`Case IPR2016-00911 (Patent 7,458,114 B2)
`
`
`
`
`PETITIONER:
`
`Gregory Carlin
`litdocketing@mcciplaw.com
`Walter Hill Levie, III
`tlevie@mcciplaw.com
`
`PATENT OWNER:
`Brian Lynch
`blynch@niro-mcandrews.com
`Raymond Niro
`rnirojr@niro-mcandrews.com
`
`
`
`3

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket