throbber
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`_____________________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`_____________________
`
`Solenis LLC
`
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`Ecolab USA Inc.,
`
`Patent Owner
`
`_____________________
`
`Inter Partes Review No.: IPR2016-1281
`
`U.S. Patent No. 8,465,623
`
`
`
`JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO 37 C.F.R. § 42.72
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`1. INTRODUCTION AND STATEMENT OF PRECISE RELIEF
`REQUESTED
`
`Patent Owner Ecolab USA Inc. and Petitioner Solenis LLC hereby jointly move
`
`to terminate this inter partes review of 8,465,623, as the parties have reached a
`
`settlement agreement. This agreement is being filed herewith as Exhibit 1032,
`
`pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 317(b). There are no other agreements, oral or written,
`
`between the parties made in connection with, or in contemplation of, the
`
`termination of each proceeding. The Board should therefore terminate this trial
`
`without rendering a Final Written Decision pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.72 in order
`
`to conserve administrative resources. The parties were authorized to file this
`
`motion on August 23, 2017.
`
`2. STATEMENT OF REASONS FOR THE RELIEF REQUESTED
`
`On a petition filed by Solenis, the Board instituted an IPR on 8,465,623, as well
`
`as on the patent’s parent, U.S. Patent No. 8,088,250. Paper 33. As described in
`
`the parties’ mandatory notices, this IPR relates to an underlying litigation in the
`
`Northern District of Illinois between Patent Owner Ecolab USA Inc, along with its
`
`related company Nalco Company, and Petitioner Solenis LLC. The parties have
`
`engaged in settlement discussions over the past months and reached an agreement
`
`to settle the underlying district court litigation. As such, the parties seek
`
`

`

`termination of this trial without a Final Written Decision to conserve their
`
`resources as well as those of the Board.
`
` The Board has authority to terminate this trial without rendering a Final
`
`Written Decision. 37 C.F.R. § 42.72. Termination in this circumstance would
`
`conserve administrative resources, and would align with 37 C.F.R. § 42.1(b)’s
`
`instruction that “[t]his part shall be construed to secure the just, speedy, and
`
`inexpensive resolution of every proceeding.”
`
`III. CONCLUSION
`
`For the forgoing reasons, the parties respectfully request that the Board
`
`terminate this trial on the 8,465,623 without rendering a Final Written Decision
`
`pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 42.72.
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Date: August 24, 2017
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`/s/Michael P. Chu
`Michael P. Chu
`Kevin P. Shortsle
`McDermott Will & Emery LLP
`444 West Lake Street, Suite 4000
`Chicago, Illinois 60606
`Phone: 312.372.2000
`Fax: 312.984.7700
`mchu@mwe.com
`kshortsle@mwe.com
`Attorneys for Petitioner
`
`/s/Anthony R. Zeuli
`Anthony R. Zeuli, Reg. No. 45,255
`Merchant & Gould P.C.
`3200 IDS Center
`80 South 8th Street
`Minneapolis, MN 55402
`Telephone: (612) 371-5208
`Fax: (612) 332-9081
`Email: tzeuli@merchantgould.com
`NalcoIPR@merchantgould.com
`Attorney for Patent Owner
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket