throbber
MULTIPLE ACCESS FOR
`BROADBAND WIRELESS NETWORKS
`
`Beyond 3G: Wideband Wireless
`Data Access Based on
`OFDM and Dynamic Packet Assignment
`
`Justin Chuang and Nelson Sollenberger, AT&T Labs-Research
`
`ABSTRACT
`The rapid growth of wireless voice sub-
`scribers, the growth of the Internet, and the
`increasing use of portable computing devices
`suggest that wireless Internet access will rise
`rapidly over the next few years. Rapid progress
`in digital and RF technology is making possible
`highly compact and integrated terminal devices,
`and the introduction of sophisticated wireless
`data software is making wireless Internet access
`more user-friendly and providing more value.
`Transmission rates are currently only about 10
`kb/s for large cell systems. Third-generation
`wireless access such as WCDMA and the evolu-
`tion of second-generation systems such as
`TDMA IS-136+, EDGE, and CDMA IS-95 will
`provide nominal bit rates of 50–384 kb/s in
`macrocellular systems. [1] This article discusses
`packet data transmission rates of 2–5 Mb/s in
`macrocellular environments and up to 10 Mb/s
`in microcellular and indoor environments as a
`complementary service to evolving second- and
`third-generation wireless systems. Dynamic
`packet assignment for high-efficiency resource
`management and packet admission; OFDM at
`the physical layer with interference suppression,
`space-time coding, and frequency diversity; as
`well as smart antennas to obtain good power
`and spectral efficiency are discussed in this pro-
`posal. Flexible allocation of both large and
`small resources also permits provisioning of
`services for different delay and throughput
`requirements.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`Wireless Internet access is expected to grow rapid-
`ly, because of the maturing of digital cellular,
`portable computing, and fixed Internet technolo-
`gies. Data transmission rates are growing rapidly
`in fixed networks with the use of wavelength-divi-
`sion multiplexing (WDM) in backbone fiber net-
`works and the introduction of cable modems and
`high-speed digital subscriber line (HDSL) technol-
`ogy in the fixed access networks. In parallel with
`the expanding availability of high-speed transmis-
`
`sion capabilities, increasingly demanding Internet
`applications and user expectations have emerged.
`Experience with laptop computers and personal
`digital assistants (PDAs) has shown that many
`end users desire their portable equipment to pro-
`vide essentially the same environment and appli-
`cations they enjoy at their desks with few
`compromises. Experience with wireless access has
`demonstrated the singular importance of
`widespread coverage and anywhere/anytime
`access. Wireless packet data access in macrocellu-
`lar environments at peak rates beyond 2 Mb/s is
`likely to be needed in the near future to provide
`users with an application environment with few
`compromises from fixed environments. Chal-
`lenges for the high-speed wireless data access
`future are transmission speeds at 100–1000 times
`existing rates; costs of a few cents per minute for
`access; RF power transmission efficiency that is
`10–20 dB better than existing systems; and sub-
`stantially increased spectral efficiency.
`Two important business drivers for comple-
`mentary packet data access at speeds above 2
`Mb/s are:
`• Integration of wireless data services across
`macrocellular, microcellular, and private
`indoor systems, and with other services
`• High spectrum efficiency
`Wireless service providers pay dearly to acquire
`spectrum. Efficiency of spectrum usage is always
`a strong factor in a decision on wireless technol-
`ogy. Spectrum efficiency becomes crucial for
`very high-speed data services (e.g., > 2 Mb/s).
`By taking advantage of improvements in digital
`signal processing (DSP) and radio frequency
`(RF) technologies, orthogonal frequency-divi-
`sion multiplexing (OFDM) provides the possibil-
`ity to provide > 2 Mb/s packet data at a cost and
`with a spectrum efficiency that allow wireless
`providers to compete with wireline carriers for
`data services. Integrated services also provide
`significant billing advantages for both customers
`and service providers. Based on customers’ pref-
`erences, telecommunications companies such as
`AT&T are moving in the direction of delivering
`integrated services which cover local residential
`and business, long distance, and both wireline
`
`78
`
`0163-6804/00/$10.00 © 2000 IEEE
`
`IEEE Communications Magazine • July 2000
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1042
`Page 1
`
`

`
`and wireless services. Integrated services also
`include voice services, circuit data, and packet
`data with transmission rates from 30 kb/s to a
`few hundred megabits per second. Providing
`nomadic customers in areas such as airports,
`hotels, and other public areas with the same user
`experience they have in their office is the key
`driver to deploy such high-rate complementary
`packet data services.
`Wideband code-division multiple access
`(WCDMA) will use 5 MHz channels, and it is a
`leading candidate for third-generation wireless
`access [1]. However, it will be limited to about
`384 kb/s (nominal) peak data rates1 for macro-
`cellular wireless access (up to 2 Mb/s rates are
`proposed for indoor environments). Global Sys-
`tem for Mobile Communications (GSM)
`enhancements based on Enhanced Data Rates
`for GSM Evolution (EDGE) using adaptive
`modulation will provide bit rates up to 384 kb/s
`in the near future. [1] Second-generation wire-
`less systems will evolve with complementary
`packet data solutions that generally use frequen-
`cy channels separated from circuit voice and cir-
`cuit data access. Time-division multiple access
`(TDMA) and CDMA systems are being consid-
`ered in which circuit and packet access share a
`common frequency channel and access modes
`are separated by time slots or spreading codes.
`However, the expected demands for high peak-
`rate Internet access are motivating increasing
`consideration of complementary access based on
`separate frequency channels to provide maxi-
`mum peak rates and to allow optimization for
`packet data transmission alone.
`OFDM was proposed for digital cellular sys-
`tems in the mid-1980s [2]. OFDM has also been
`shown to be effective for digital audio and digi-
`tal video broadcasting at multimegabit rates in
`Europe, and it has been incorporated into stan-
`dards by the European Telecommunications
`Standards Institute (ETSI). The IEEE 802.11
`standards group recently chose OFDM modula-
`tion for wireless LANs operating at bit rates up
`to 30 Mb/s at 5 GHz. In this article, OFDM
`modulation combined with dynamic packet
`assignment with wideband 5 MHz channels is
`proposed for high-speed packet data wireless
`access in macrocellular and microcellular envi-
`ronments, supporting a family of peak bit rates
`ranging from 2 to 10 Mb/s. OFDM can largely
`eliminate the effects of intersymbol interference
`for high-speed transmission rates in very disper-
`sive environments, and it readily supports inter-
`ference suppression and space-time coding to
`enhance efficiency. Dynamic packet assignment
`can support excellent spectrum efficiency and
`high peak-rate data access.
`WIDEBAND OFDM
`WCDMA is now recognized as one of the lead-
`ing candidates for third-generation wireless
`access. Based on direct-sequence spread-spec-
`trum with a chip rate of 3.84 Mchips/s, it occu-
`pies a bandwidth of about 5 MHz. It will support
`circuit and packet data access at nominal rates
`up to 384 kb/s in macrocellular environments,
`and provide simultaneous voice and data ser-
`vices. An advanced cellular Internet service
`(ACIS) concept based on OFDM signaling and
`
`IEEE Communications Magazine • July 2000
`
`dynamic packet assignment (DPA) has been pro-
`posed, with the potential to provide 384 kb/s
`data services in macrocellular environments using
`only 1 MHz of spectrum [3]. It is possible to
`expand this ACIS concept into a wideband con-
`text in 5 MHz while providing a complementary
`service to third generation systems such as
`EDGE and WCDMA. This wideband OFDM
`system would support an order of magnitude
`higher peak data transmission rate in macrocells
`at 2 to 5 Mb/s and up to 10 Mb/s in microcells.
`IS-136, GSM or WCDMA would provide circuit
`voice and other circuit-based services and basic
`data services. A complementary high-speed
`packet data mode would provide fast wireless
`packet data access to meet the demand for wire-
`less data in the future that provides access per-
`formance similar to wideband fixed access. Since
`portable equipment is power-limited, strongly
`asymmetrical traffic should be supported, and
`uplink transmission rates should be allowed to
`adapt downward as necessary to support the
`required link budgets. Wideband OFDM wire-
`less access might also be configured to introduce
`new broadband capabilities using OFDM only
`on the downlink, which is then integrated with
`emerging wireless packet data systems such as
`General Packet Radio Service (GPRS), EDGE,
`or WCDMA to provide two-way access. An
`example of such a system with the EDGE uplink
`is discussed in [4].2
`There are a number of reasons to consider
`such a high-rate complementary packet data
`capability for downlinks. Wireless Internet
`usage is likely to be downlink-limited. Further-
`more, for data services, peak bit rate is very
`important in determining overall system perfor-
`mance, because of the highly bursty nature of
`Internet traffic. GPRS, EDGE, and WCDMA
`solutions will support transmission rates of
`144–384 kb/s in macrocellular environments. To
`achieve rates in the megabits-per-second range
`for all environments using ~5 MHz spectrum is
`challenging for both the physical layer and radio
`resource management design. Single-carrier
`TDMA solutions are limited in supportable
`transmission bit rate by equalizer complexity.
`Even though new techniques such as interfer-
`ence suppression and space-time processing are
`promising, the interactions of these techniques
`with equalization significantly lower achievable
`bit rates in hostile operating environments for
`single-carrier solutions. Low spreading gain or
`intercode interference at high bit rates limits
`CDMA solutions. The use of OFDM with suffi-
`ciently long symbol periods of 100–200 ms for
`packet data transmission addresses these issues.
`It supports a high bit rate in time delay spread
`environments with performance that improves
`with increasing delay spread up to a point of
`extreme dispersion. Another reason to consider
`a complementary packet data solution is to use
`optimized admission procedures for packet data
`access that is fairly aggressive in order to achieve
`high spectral efficiency. An aggressive admission
`policy will result in high word error rates
`(WERs) that can generally be managed for
`Internet services using automatic repeat request
`(ARQ) techniques but are problematic for
`delay-sensitive voice services. Therefore, a com-
`
`OFDM can largely
`eliminate the
`effects of
`intersymbol
`interference for
`high-speed
`transmission rates
`in very dispersive
`environments,
`and it readily
`supports
`interference
`suppression and
`space-time
`coding to
`enhance
`efficiency.
`
`1 Peak rates exceeding 1
`Mb/s under limited condi-
`tions for very few simulta-
`neous users are also
`considered for some sys-
`tems.
`
`2 In [4] we focused on the
`architecture of such a
`system in a macrocullar
`system. This article pro-
`vides a detailed discussion
`of the design considera-
`tions under different con-
`ditions. However, the
`numerical results shown
`in [4] were based on an
`improved radio link
`design using convolution-
`al codes to achieve even
`better performance.
`
`79
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1042
`Page 2
`
`

`
`With the wider
`bandwidth
`discussed in this
`article, many
`subchannels are
`available, which
`provides a
`possibility to
`achieve good
`performance by
`exploiting time
`and frequency
`diversity without
`using multiple
`transmit
`antennas.
`
`plementary high-peak-rate packet data capabili-
`ty designed with non-delay-sensitive services as
`a priority is attractive. In this article we consider
`OFDM to overcome physical layer barriers for
`attaining high bit rates, and we consider DPA to
`enable aggressive packet access with high spec-
`trum efficiency. In addition, we will also discuss
`a frame structure which allows flexibility to
`accommodate low-delay services with small
`resources, so potential benefits of multimedia
`services can be realized.
`The remainder of this article is organized as
`follows. We discuss OFDM-based physical layer
`techniques and DPA-based medium access con-
`trol (MAC) techniques for realizing the proposed
`wideband OFDM system. Through a combination
`of OFDM, DPA, adaptive modulation and cod-
`ing, smart antennas, and space-time coding, dif-
`ferent bit rates can be provided with varying
`efficiency and robustness. We describe a possible
`frame structure in which all these techniques can
`be implemented for both large-resource high-rate
`data services and small-resource low-delay ser-
`vices. Simulation results based on the large
`resource assignment procedure are shown to
`demonstrate the potential performance achiev-
`able in macrocellular environments. We conclude
`this article by outlining important attributes of
`this proposal and areas for further study.
`
`PHYSICAL AND MAC LAYER
`TECHNIQUES AND DEPLOYMENT
`SCENARIOS
`
`This section discusses how wideband OFDM can
`be implemented in both macrocells and micro-
`cells to provide ubiquitous broadband services.
`Most of the techniques discussed next for macro-
`cells are also applicable to enable wideband
`OFDM in microcells with potential for even
`higher rates.
`WIDEBAND OFDM IN MACROCELLS
`Physical Layer Techniques — In typical wire-
`line applications, communication channels are
`generally static over the connection period. In
`this case, OFDM subchannel power and bit allo-
`cation can be optimized through measurement
`and feedback in the initial link setup process.
`Measurement errors and feedback delay signifi-
`cantly reduce the performance of this technique
`in time-varying wireless fading channels. In wire-
`less channels, good link performance can be
`achieved by OFDM when combined with diversi-
`ty, interleaving, and coding [2]. OFDM inherent-
`ly provides frequency diversity over subchannels,
`which introduces an opportunity for interleaving
`in the frequency domain. However, adjacent
`subchannels may still be highly correlated. Sony
`has proposed an OFDM-based scheme [5] using
`time-domain interleaving combined with fre-
`quency hopping to enhance performance. This
`system also uses frequency hopping to achieve
`interference averaging.
`However, when high peak rate is desired
`while bandwidth is limited, there may generally
`not be enough “clusters” of subchannels to use
`for frequency hopping. Reference [3] proposed
`
`the application of multiple transmit antennas for
`sending adjacent subchannel signals to achieve
`frequency diversity without requiring frequency
`hopping or interleaving in the time domain,
`which introduces delay. More advanced trans-
`mitter diversity based on space-time coding [6]
`can further enhance spectrum efficiency provid-
`ed accurate channel estimation is available. Sim-
`plified transmitter diversity can be achieved by
`transmitting the same OFDM symbols on multi-
`ple antennas with delayed transmission times.
`With the wider bandwidth discussed in this arti-
`cle, many subchannels are available, which pro-
`vides a possibility to achieve good performance
`by exploiting time and frequency diversity with-
`out using multiple transmit antennas.
`Assume a bandwidth of 5 MHz is divided into
`about 20 radio resources of 200 kHz each with 1
`MHz reserved for guard bands. Every 200-kHz
`radio resource can be constructed by grouping a
`cluster of (25) 8-kHz subchannels. Frequency
`diversity can be achieved by hopping over differ-
`ent clusters on different time slots. The same
`hopping pattern is repeated once every frame of
`8 slots. Up to 20 users can be simultaneously
`assigned, one resource each, using different hop-
`ping patterns that are free from collisions. High-
`rate users can be assigned multiple or all
`resources. Date rates equivalent to a fraction of
`a nominal radio resource can also be assigned by
`scheduling transmission in the time domain. We
`will discuss assignment of large and small
`resources for different applications. A key fea-
`ture of a 5 MHz bandwidth is the availability of
`diversity and interleaving in both time and fre-
`quency domains, which enables high coding gain
`to achieve performance enhancement using a
`single transmit antenna.
`OFDM has been proposed for the physical
`layer for ACIS in macrocells with 1–2 b/s/Hz
`channel coding using mode adaptation with
`quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK) and 8-
`PSK modulation to support peak bit rates up to
`1 Mb/s in about 800 kHz channels [3]. This
`allows for various overheads to account for up to
`50 percent of the total available bandwidth. With
`a 4 MHz bandwidth, similar to WCDMA, up to
`5 Mb/s can be achieved. OFDM provides good
`support for interference suppression and smart
`antennas [7] because the effects of dispersion
`can be removed at a receiver easily by first pro-
`cessing each antenna’s signal with a discrete
`Fourier transform (DFT) before combining with
`an interference suppression algorithm. Packet
`data wireless access tends to be dominant-inter-
`ference-limited, so linear interference suppres-
`sion techniques are effective to increase capacity
`with a two-branch receiver. These techniques
`support operation near 0 dB signal-to-interfer-
`ence (S/I) and at about 5 dB signal-to-noise ratio
`(SNR) for 1 b/s/Hz coding [7].
`One of the strong challenges of providing up
`to 5 Mb/s transmission rates on downlinks for
`packet data in macrocells is the link budget. RF
`power amplifier cost is a major factor in base
`station cost, and it is a major contributor to
`power supply requirements, heat management,
`and equipment size. An IS-136 channel delivers
`about 24 kb/s of coded user data with acceptable
`quality on a fading channel at about 17 dB SNR.
`
`80
`
`IEEE Communications Magazine • July 2000
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1042
`Page 3
`
`

`
`One of the
`benefits of DPA
`based on
`interference
`avoidance is that
`it is relatively
`insensitive to
`errors in power
`control, and it
`provides good
`performance even
`without power
`control.
`
`Therefore, 2.5 Mb/s would require 100 times as
`much transmit power (20 dB) unless additional
`techniques are introduced. Smart antenna tech-
`nology using four switched 30˚ beams in a 120˚
`sector is now a well-developed technology with
`some early deployment. This technology pro-
`vides up to 6 dB in link budget improvement
`and also improves capacity. Terminal two-branch
`receiver diversity combined with concatenated
`convolutional/Reed-Solomon coding supports
`receiver sensitivities of less than 5 dB SNR with
`1 b/s/Hz coding. Space-time coding can provide
`SNR gain based on transmit diversity. By com-
`bining smart antenna technology at base stations
`with terminal receiver sensitivities of less than 5
`dB SNR, the downlink for wideband OFDM can
`support peak transmission rates of 2–5 Mb/s with
`about the same transmit power and coverage as
`a single transceiver for IS-136 TDMA or analog
`cellular technologies.
`
`MAC-Layer Techniques — Very high spec-
`trum efficiency will be required for wideband
`OFDM, particularly for macrocellular opera-
`tion. First-generation cellular systems used
`fixed channel assignment. Second-generation
`cellular systems generally use fixed channel
`assignment or interference averaging with
`spread spectrum. WCDMA will also use inter-
`ference averaging. Interference avoidance or
`dynamic channel assignment (DCA) has been
`used in some systems, generally as a means of
`automatic channel assignment or local capacity
`enhancement, but not as a means of large sys-
`temwide capacity enhancement. Some of the
`reasons for not fully exploiting the large poten-
`tial capacity gain of DCA are the difficulties
`introduced by rapid channel reassignment and
`intensive receiver measurements required by a
`high-performance DCA or interference avoid-
`ance algorithm. OFDM promises to overcome
`these challenging implementation issues. It was
`shown by Pottie [8] that interference averaging
`techniques can perform better than fixed chan-
`nel assignment techniques, whereas interfer-
`ence avoidance techniques can outperform
`interference averaging techniques by a factor of
`2–3 in spectrum efficiency.
`For existing second-generation systems, the
`achieved spectrum efficiency measured in
`b/s/Hz/sector (assuming 3 sectors/cell) is much
`lower than that shown in [8], which was obtained
`under idealized conditions. IS-136 TDMA today
`provides a spectrum efficiency of about 4 per-
`cent (3 x 8 kb/30 kHz x 1/21 reuse). GSM also
`provides a spectrum efficiency of about 4 per-
`cent (8 x 13 kb/200 kHz x 1/12 reuse). IS-95
`CDMA provides a spectrum efficiency of 4 per-
`cent to 7 percent (12 to 20 x 8 kb/1250 kHz x 1
`reuse x 1/2 voice activity). DCA combined with
`circuit-based technology (which is the approach
`generally taken to date) can provide some bene-
`fits. However, it cannot provide large capacity
`gains, because of the dynamics of interference in
`a mobile system as well as the difficulty in imple-
`menting rapid channel reassignments. In circuit-
`based systems channel variations, especially
`those caused by the change of shadow fading,
`are frequently faster than what can be adapted
`by the slow assignment cycle possible in the cir-
`
`cuit services. As a result, the DCA gain is limit-
`ed to somewhat better traffic resource utiliza-
`tion, which may be achieved at the cost of
`nonoptimal interference management. To
`achieve the potential of DCA gain, channel reas-
`signments must take place at high speed to avoid
`rapidly changing interference. DPA, based on
`properties of an OFDM physical layer, is pro-
`posed, which reassigns transmission resources on
`a packet-by-packet basis using high-speed receiv-
`er measurements to overcome these problems
`[9]. Having orthogonal subchannels well defined
`in time-frequency grids, OFDM has a key advan-
`tage here with the ability to rapidly measure
`interference or path loss parameters in parallel
`on all candidate channels, either directly or
`based on pilot tones. One of the benefits of
`DPA based on interference avoidance is that it
`is relatively insensitive to errors in power con-
`trol, and provides good performance even with-
`out power control. Reference [8] shows that
`DCA without power control decreases capacity
`up to a factor of 2. However, even without power
`control, interference avoidance can outperform
`interference averaging with power control. This
`is particularly advantageous for packet transmis-
`sion where effective power control is problemat-
`ic due to the rapid arrival and departure of
`interfering packets.
`The basic protocol for a downlink comprises
`four basic steps:
`• A packet page from a base station to a ter-
`minal
`• Rapid measurements of resource usage by a
`terminal using the parallelism of an OFDM
`receiver
`• A short report from the terminal to the base
`station of the potential transmission quality
`associated with each resource (a unit of band-
`width that is separately assignable)
`• Selection of resources by the base and trans-
`mission of the data
`This protocol could be modified to move some
`of the over-the-air functions into fixed network
`transmission functions to reduce wireless trans-
`mission overhead at the cost of more demand-
`ing fixed network transmission requirements.
`The frame structures of adjacent base stations
`are staggered in time (i.e., neighboring base sta-
`tions sequentially perform the four different
`DPA functions outlined above with a predeter-
`mined rotation schedule). This avoids collisions
`of channel assignments (i.e., the possibility for
`adjacent base stations to independently select
`the same channel, thus causing interference
`when transmissions occur). In addition to
`achieving much of the potential gain of a rapid
`interference avoidance protocol, this protocol
`provides a good basis for admission control and
`mode (bit rate) adaptation based on measured
`signal quality.
`Figure 1 shows the performance of this algo-
`rithm with several modulation/coding schemes
`and with either two-branch maximal-ratio-com-
`bining or two-branch receiver interference sup-
`pression using packet traffic models based on
`Internet statistics [9]. Results with interference
`suppression for space-time coding are not includ-
`ed because each transmitted signal appears as
`multiple signals, which significantly limits the
`
`IEEE Communications Magazine • July 2000
`
`81
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1042
`Page 4
`
`

`
`poles and building walls. In addition, high bit
`rates are desirable to provide a capability as
`near to that of wired access as possible. For
`indoor and private system access, unlicensed
`spectrum at 5 GHz or higher may be desirable,
`where large bandwidths are available. For
`these environments, small antennas are
`required. Because of the large angular spread
`experienced at radio ports located in the clut-
`ter of buildings and trees, simple omnidirec-
`tional or low-gain antennas are appropriate. In
`that environment, antenna beam switching
`provides limited gains in performance, but
`adaptive antenna arrays and/or space-time
`coding can be very effective. For example, in a
`5 MHz channel, peak rates of 10 Mb/s could
`be supported using two transmit and two
`receive antennas for the radio link with space-
`time coding of 16-quadrature amplitude modu-
`lation (QAM) to achieve a 4 b/s/Hz coding
`rate while allowing for about 50 percent over-
`head. Mode adaptation to 5 or 2 Mb/s would
`support appropriate link budgets for robust
`coverage.
`Microcell radio ports could be implemented
`that provide little more than radio modem func-
`tions to allow for very small radio ports. One
`possible approach is to use a combination of
`dual antennas at each port and multiport pro-
`cessing per user at a centralized headend. For
`example, if a user delivers, on average, a strong
`signal to M ports, the dual-branch signals back-
`hauled from the M “best” ports can be pro-
`cessed at the central site using selection or
`combining techniques. Simulation studies have
`shown that grouping of microcell ports in this
`way can yield impressive results in link reliabili-
`ty and capacity due to macroscopic diversity.
`Moreover, this approach requires a minimal
`amount of processing at the ports, thus keeping
`them simple. The processing at the central site
`can also be fairly simple if the signals being
`combined are not dispersed by significant multi-
`path propagation. The grouping approach is
`therefore compatible with the use of OFDM,
`wherein each frequency (or subgroup of fre-
`quencies) can be processed with parameters
`optimized for that frequency. This kind of pro-
`cessing works best with time-division duplexing
`(TDD), which requires using the same carrier
`frequency for transmission and reception. This
`is consistent with the planning for very high-
`speed micro- and picocellular services in third-
`generation systems.
`Backhaul could be a significant cost issue in
`microcellular systems. Various innovative ways
`to use fiber, coax, microwave radio, and millime-
`ter-wave radio can be envisioned to make this
`part of the system reliable. The key require-
`ments are to deploy microcells only in areas
`where there is a strong expectation of high-
`speed service demand and to provide wide-area
`coverage with a compatible technology.
`DPA requires low delay between the air inter-
`face and resource assignment function, so any
`architecture that minimizes radio port function-
`ality would need to consider that constraint. This
`also means that DPA should allow some margin
`in timing for delay in microcellular transmission
`equipment.
`
`QPSK, space-time coding
`QPSK, delay diversity
`QPSK, delay div, int sup
`8PSK, delay div, int sup
`
`2 b/s/Hz
`
`1 b/s/Hz
`
`0
`
`10
`
`20
`Occupancy (%)
`
`30
`
`40
`
`45
`
`40
`
`35
`
`30
`
`25
`
`20
`
`15
`
`10
`
`05
`
`Retransmission probability (%)
`
`■ Figure 1. Performance as a function of occupancy for different modulation
`and diversity schemes.
`
`suppression of interference. These results are
`based on an OFDM radio link with a bandwidth
`of about 800 kHz, and the bit rates in the follow-
`ing discussion are scaled up for an occupied
`bandwidth of 4 MHz. A system is considered
`with three sectors per base station, each having a
`transceiver. All base stations share one wideband
`OFDM RF channel by using DPA to avoid co-
`channel interference. DPA enables frequency
`reuse in the time domain among all radio
`transceivers. Occupancy is defined to be the frac-
`tion of slots being used. As traffic intensity
`increases, occupancy increases, which results in
`higher interference and more retransmissions.
`Power control was not used to obtain these
`results. Simulation results based on the wideband
`set of parameters will be presented following a
`description of a possible frame structure. These
`results show that good performance is obtained
`with 1 b/s/Hz coding even at an average occupan-
`cy per base station of 100 percent (33 percent per
`sector). With two-branch interference suppression
`and 1 b/s/Hz coding, the average retransmission
`probability is only about 3 percent throughout the
`system with the average delivered bit rate of
`about 2.5 Mb/s per base station. Using ARQ at
`the radio link layer will permit Internet service at
`this retransmission probability with good quality
`of service (QoS). Higher retransmission probabili-
`ty may be acceptable at the expense of longer
`packet delay. Peak rates up to 5 Mb/s are possible
`with lower occupancies using 2 b/s/Hz coding.
`Finally, in addition to interference suppression at
`the receiver, beam switching smart antenna tech-
`niques, performed by the transmitter, can also be
`applied to reduce interference, thus achieving
`good performance at 5 Mb/s even at 100 percent
`occupancy per base station.
`WIDEBAND OFDM IN MICROCELLS
`For microcell deployment, very compact radio
`ports with low power requirements are desir-
`able to permit convenient siting on existing
`
`82
`
`IEEE Communications Magazine • July 2000
`
`Facebook's Exhibit No. 1042
`Page 5
`
`

`
`528 tones divided into
`
`22 24-tone clusters
`
`x
`
`Three control
`channels
`
`22 packet data channels
`
`x
`
`x
`
`Pilot channel
`
`Paging channel
`
`Assignment channel
`
`Frequency
`
`24 OFDM blocks
`
`104 OFDM blocks in 8 slots
`
`■ Figure 2. Division of radio resources in time and frequency domains to allow
`DPA for high-peak-rate data services; small radio resources, needed for low-
`delay services, occupy only one slot, which is further divided into four mini-
`slots to allow coding across different frequency clusters.
`
`achieve this frequency diversity for small resources
`a slot is divided into mini-slots, at the cost of
`reduced efficiency due to TDMA overhead.
`
`HIGH-PEAK-RATE DATA SERVICES:
`LARGE RADIO RESOURCES
`
`528 subchannels (4.224 MHz) are organized into
`22 clusters of 24 subchannels (192 kHz) each
`and 8 time slots of 13 OFDM blocks each within
`a 20-ms frame of 128 blocks. Figure 2 shows this
`resource allocation scheme. The control channel
`functions are defined in [3]. This allows flexibili-
`ty in channel assignment while providing 24
`blocks of control overheard to perform the DPA
`procedures.
`This arrangement of tone clusters is similar
`to the arrangements in the band-division multi-
`ple access (BDMA) proposal by Sony. Figure 3
`depicts this operation. Each tone cluster would
`contain 22 individual modulation tones plus 2
`guard tones, and an OFDM block would have a
`time duration of 156.25 ms with 31.25 ms for
`guard time and ramp time to minimize the
`effects of delay spread up to about a 20-ms span.
`Of the 13 OFDM blocks in each traffic slot, two
`blocks are used as overhead, which includes a
`leading block for synchronization (phase/fre-
`quency/timing acquisition and channel estima-
`tion) and a trailing block as guard time for
`separating consecutive time slots. A single radio
`resource is associated with a frequency-hopping
`pattern, by which the packets are transmitted
`using eight different tone clusters in each of the
`eight traffic slots. Coding across eight traffic
`slots for user data, as shown in Fig. 3, exploits
`frequency diversity which gives sufficient coding
`gain for performance enhancement in the fading
`channel. This arrangement supports 22 resources
`in frequency that can be assigned by DPA. Tak-
`ing into account overhead for OFDM block
`guard time, synchronization, slot separation, and
`DPA control, a peak data rate of 2.1296 (3.3792
`x 22/24 x 11/13 x 104/128) Mb/s is available for
`packet date services using all 22 radio resources,
`each 96.8 kb/s.
`
`3 The grouping can be
`configured similar to con-
`ventional frequency plan-
`ning for reuse factor 4
`using a regular and repeti-
`tive pattern, for example,
`with timing groups 1 and
`2 alternating in the odd
`rows and groups 3 and 4
`in the even rows.
`
`4 The word “resource” is
`used to emphasize that the
`assignment of radio chan-
`nels for traffic bearers can
`be a general combination
`of time slots, frequency
`sub-car

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket