throbber
Trials@uspto.gov
`571-272-7822
`
`
`
`
`
`Paper 39
`Entered: July 20, 2020
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`____________
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`____________
`
`MICROSOFT CORPORATION,
`Petitioner,
`
`v.
`
`IPA TECHNOLOGIES INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`____________
`
`Cases IPR2019-00810, IPR2019-00811,
`IPR2019-00812, IPR2019-00813, IPR2019-00814
`(Patent 6,851,115 B1)
`and
`Cases IPR2019-00835, IPR2019-00836,
`IPR2019-00837 (Patent 7,069,560 B1)
`_____________
`
`
`
`Before LYNNE E. PETTIGREW, MINN CHUNG, and KEVIN C. TROCK,
`Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`PER CURIAM.
`
`
`ORDER1
`Granting Joint Request to Correct Record
`37 C.F.R. § 42.5
`
`
`1 We issue one Order to be filed in each case. Citations are to IPR2019-
`00810 unless otherwise noted. The parties are not authorized to use a multi-
`case caption.
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00810, IPR2019-00811, IPR2019-00812, IPR2019-00813,
`IPR2019-00814 (Patent 6,851,115 B1) and Cases IPR2019-00835,
`IPR2019-00836, IPR2019-00837 (Patent 7,069,560 B1)
`
`
`
`On July 14, 2020, we received by email a joint request from counsel
`for the parties to make certain corrections to the record in these cases.2 In
`the email, the parties jointly requested the following corrections to the
`record:
`The parties have conferred regarding a dispute relating to
`exhibits submitted with Patent Owner’s Sur-Reply and have
`reached a compromise to address the dispute. Specifically, the
`parties have agreed that the following should be expunged or
`stricken from the record:
`
`
`
`
`- Exhibit 2082 (from the -810, -811, -812, -813, -814, -
`835, -836, and -837 proceedings)
`
`- Exhibit 2084 (from the -835, -836, -837 proceedings)
`
`- The entire following sentence in the Consolidated Patent
`Owner Sur-Replies on page 41 (-810, -811, -812, -813, -
`814 proceedings) and page 36 (-835, -836, -837
`proceedings):
`
`
`There is ample literature—including a seminal
`publication from Carnegie Mellon University—
`dating back at least to 1995 on the issue of
`“architectural mismatch” that arises when such
`combinations are attempted even by world-leading
`software engineering researchers. (See Ex. 2082.)
`
`
`
`
`2 A copy of the July 14, 2020 email will be entered as Exhibit 3002 in each
`of the eight cases.
`
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00810, IPR2019-00811, IPR2019-00812, IPR2019-00813,
`IPR2019-00814 (Patent 6,851,115 B1) and Cases IPR2019-00835,
`IPR2019-00836, IPR2019-00837 (Patent 7,069,560 B1)
`
`
`
`- The underlined and bolded portions of the following
`passage in the Consolidated Patent Owner Sur-Reply on
`page 42 (-835, -836, -837 proceedings):
`
`
`“Component” (which is a software-system
`design/implementation notion) and “process”
`(which is an operating system notion) are
`orthogonal notions. (See Ex. 2084, 65-67.)
`Namely, multiple components may run in a single
`process; it may be possible to have a single
`component per process in a specific software
`system (per the system architects’ design
`decision); it may also be possible to distribute a
`single component (e.g., a server that must service
`many clients simultaneously) across multiple
`processes. (Id.)
`
`
`Ex. 3002.
`A conference call was held with counsel for the parties that day to
`discuss the joint request and other matters. During the conference call, the
`parties confirmed their agreement to the joint request to correct the record as
`described in the email. See id.
`Having considered the parties joint request and the reasons therefor,
`we find that there is good cause to expunge Exhibits 2082 and 2084, as well
`as to have filed corrected Patent Owner Sur-Replies, in the identified
`proceedings. Accordingly, the parties’ joint request to correct the record as
`described in Exhibit 3002 is granted.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`IPR2019-00810, IPR2019-00811, IPR2019-00812, IPR2019-00813,
`IPR2019-00814 (Patent 6,851,115 B1) and Cases IPR2019-00835,
`IPR2019-00836, IPR2019-00837 (Patent 7,069,560 B1)
`
`
`For PETITIONER:
`Joseph Micallef
`Scott Border
`SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
`jmicallef@sidley.com
`sborder@sidley.com
`
`For PATENT OWNER:
`Steven Hartsell
`Alexander Gasser
`Sarah Spires
`SKIERMONT DERBY LLP
`shartsell@skiermontderby.com
`agasser@skiermontderby.com
`sspires@skiermontderby.com
`
`
`
`
`
`4
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket