throbber
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 32
`571-272-7822 Entered: December 16, 2025
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`APPLE INC,,
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`SMITH INTERFACE TECHNOLOGIES, LLC,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2024-01085
`Patent 10,649,580 B1
`
`Before JAMESON LEE, JEFFREY S. SMITH,
`and MIRIAM L. QUINN, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conditionally Granting Patent Owner’s Motion for
`Admission Pro Hac Vice of
`
`Arthur P. Licygiewicz
`37CF.R. §42.10
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[PR2024-01085
`Patent 10,649,580 B1
`
`On April 8, 2025, Patent Owner, Smith Interface Technologies, LLC
`(“Patent Owner”), filed a Motion requesting admission pro hac vice of
`Arthur P. Licygiewicz. Paper 14 (“Motion”). The Motion relies on a
`Declaration from Mr. Licygiewicz. Ex. 2005. Patent Owner attests that
`Petitioner does not oppose the motions. Motion 3.
`
`Patent Owner filed an Updated Mandatory Notice, identifying
`Mr. Licygiewicz as back-up counsel, as required by 37 C.F.R. § 42.8(b)(3).
`Paper 15. However, Patent Owner has not submitted a Power of Attorney
`for Mr. Licygiewicz in accordance with 37 C.F.R § 42.10(b). In view
`thereof, and for the reasons provided below, Patent Owner’s Motions are
`conditionally granted, and are to be effective immediately after Patent
`Owner files the aforementioned Power of Attorney.
`
`In accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c), we may recognize counsel
`pro hac vice during a proceeding upon a showing of good cause. In
`authorizing a motion for admission pro hac vice, the Board requires the
`moving party to provide a statement of facts showing there is good cause for
`the Board to recognize counsel pro hac vice and an affidavit or declaration
`of the individual seeking to appear in the proceeding. See Unified Patents,
`Inc. v. Parallel Iron, LLC, Case IPR2013-00639, Paper 7 (PTAB Oct. 15,
`2013) (setting forth the requirements for admission pro hac vice).
`
`Based on the facts set forth in the Motion and the accompanying
`Declaration, we conclude that Mr. Licygiewicz has sufficient legal and
`technical qualifications to represent Patent Owner in the above-identified
`proceedings, that Mr. Licygiewicz has demonstrated sufficient litigation
`experience and familiarity with the subject matter of the above-identified
`
`proceedings, and that Mr. Licygiewicz meets all other requirements for
`2
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[PR2024-01085
`Patent 10,649,580 B1
`admission pro hac vice. See Ex. 2005 99 1-10. Accordingly, Patent Owner
`has established good cause for admission pro hac vice of Mr. Licygiewicz.
`Mr. Licygiewicz will be permitted to appear pro hac vice as back-up counsel
`only. See 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(c).
`Accordingly, it is
`ORDERED that Patent Owner’s Motion (Paper 14) for admission pro
`hac vice of Arthur P. Licygiewicz in the above-identified proceedings is
`conditionally granted, provided that within ten (10) business days of the date
`of this order, Patent Owner submits a Power of Attorney for
`Mr. Licygiewicz in accordance with 37 C.F.R. § 42.10(b) in this proceeding;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Patent Owner is to continue to have a
`registered practitioner represent it as lead counsel for these proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Licygiewicz is authorized to
`represent Patent Owner as back-up counsel only in these proceedings;
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Licygiewicz be familiar with the
`Consolidated Trial Practice Guide, 84 Fed. Reg. 64,280 (Nov. 21, 2019), and
`the Board’s Rules of Practice for Trials, as set forth in Part 42 of Title 37,
`Code of Federal Regulations; and
`FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Licygiewicz be subject to the
`Office’s disciplinary jurisdiction under 37 C.F.R. § 11.19(a) and the USPTO
`Rules of Professional Conduct set forth in 37 C.F.R. §§ 11.101 ef seq.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IPR2024-01085
`Patent 10,649,580 B1
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`W. Karl Renner
`
`Jennifer Huang
`
`FISH & RICHARDSON P.C.
`axf-ptab@fr.com
`jhuang@fr.com
`IPR50095-01651P1@fr.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Eagle H. Robinson
`
`Daniel S. Leventhal
`
`Chad Wallis
`
`NORTON ROSE FULBRIGHT US LLP
`eagle.robinson@nortonrosefulbright.com
`daniel.leventhal@nortonrosefulbright.com
`chad.wallis@nortonrosefulbright.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket