throbber
Trials@uspto.gov Paper 38
`571-272-7822 Date: March 9, 2026
`
`UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
`
`BEFORE THE PATENT TRIAL AND APPEAL BOARD
`
`PADAGIS US LLC,
`Petitioner,
`
`V.
`
`NEURELIS, INC.,
`Patent Owner.
`
`IPR2025-00464 (Patent 8,895,546 B2)
`IPR2025-00465 (Patent 11,241,414 B2)
`IPR2025-00466 (Patent 11,793,786 B2)!
`
`Before GRACE KARAFFA OBERMANN, ANNETTE R. REIMERS, and
`TIMOTHY G. MAJORS, Administrative Patent Judges.
`
`MAIJORS, Administrative Patent Judge.
`
`ORDER
`Conduct of the Proceeding, Addressing Availability of Patent Owner'’s
`
`Declarants for Deposition
`37 CF.R. §§42.5,42.20, 42.51
`
`' This Order addresses issues common to the listed cases. Therefore, we
`exercise our discretion to issue one Order to be filed in each case. The
`parties are not authorized to use this style heading.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[PR2025-00464 (Patent 8,895,546 B2)
`[PR2025-00465 (Patent 11,241,414 B2)
`[PR2025-00466 (Patent 11,793,786 B2)
`
`L. DISCUSSION
`
`On February 26, 2026, Petitioner wrote to the Board via email seeking
`authorization to file a motion to strike the declarations of Steve Cartt, Mark
`Mitchnik, and David Hale.? Ex. 3003. According to Petitioner, we should
`authorize the motion to strike because Patent Owner has cancelled, and
`declined to reschedule, depositions of the above-named declarants. /d.
`Petitioner argues that Patent Owner’s refusal to make its declarants available
`at this time for depositions in these proceedings is contrary to 37 C.F.R.
`
`§ 42.51(b)(1)(i1). Id.
`
`The time period for Patent Owner to make Messrs. Cartt, Mitchnik,
`and Hale available for deposition in these proceedings is extended. Patent
`Owner is not required to make its declarants, Messrrs. Cartt, Mitchnik, and
`Hale, available for deposition during such time as Patent Owner’s Request
`for Rehearing of the Board’s February 6, 2026, Order remains pending and
`for a period of five calendar days after the Board decides that Request for
`Rehearing. Within five calendar days of the Board deciding Patent Owner’s
`Request for Rehearing, the parties will meet and confer to discuss suitable
`dates for deposition of Messrrs. Cartt, Mitchnik, and Hale. If Patent Owner
`declines to provide dates when Messrrs. Cartt, Mitchnik, and Hale will be
`
`available for deposition pursuant to the schedule above, Petitioner is
`
`2 The Cartt, Mitchnick, and Hale declarations are, respectively,
`Exhibits 2045, 2046, and 2047. We reference exhibit numbers and papers
`
`filed in IPR2025-00464. Similar papers/exhibits were filed in the related,
`above-listed proceedings.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[PR2025-00464 (Patent 8,895,546 B2)
`[PR2025-00465 (Patent 11,241,414 B2)
`[PR2025-00466 (Patent 11,793,786 B2)
`authorize to move to strike those declarants’ testimony with due dates and
`page limits for briefing as provided in the order below.
`II. ORDER
`
`In consideration of the foregoing, it is:
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner is not required to make its declarants,
`Messrrs. Cartt, Mitchnik, and Hale, available for deposition in these
`proceedings during such time as Patent Owner’s Request for Rehearing of
`the Board’s February 6, 2026, Order remains pending and for a period of
`five calendar days after the Board decides that Request for Rehearing;
`
`ORDERED that, within five calendar days of the Board deciding
`Patent Owner’s Request for Rehearing, the parties will meet and confer to
`discuss suitable dates for deposition of Messrrs. Cartt, Mitchnik, and Hale;
`
`ORDERED that, in the event Patent Owner declines to provide dates
`when Messrrs. Cartt, Mitchnik, and Hale will be available for deposition
`pursuant to the schedule above, Petitioner is authorize to move to strike
`those declarants’ testimony;
`
`ORDERED that such motion to strike from Petitioner (if authorized as
`provided above) must be filed within fourteen days after the Board decides
`Patent Owner’s pending Request for Rehearing, and such motion shall not
`exceed 10 pages in length; and
`
`ORDERED that Patent Owner may file an opposition to such motion
`to strike by Petitioner, which opposition will be due within fourteen days
`
`after such motion is filed and will similarly not exceed 10 pages in length.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`[PR2025-00464 (Patent 8,895,546 B2)
`[PR2025-00465 (Patent 11,241,414 B2)
`[PR2025-00466 (Patent 11,793,786 B2)
`
`FOR PETITIONER:
`
`James Murphy
`
`Corey Casey
`POLSINELLI PC.
`jpmurphy@polsinelli.com
`ccasey(@polsinelli.com
`
`FOR PATENT OWNER:
`
`Michael A Sitzman
`
`Timothy Best
`
`MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP
`msitzman@mwe.com
`
`tbest@mwe.com
`
`Raymond Miller
`
`Nancy Stakleff
`
`DLA Piper LLP (US)
`raymond.miller@us.dlapiper.com
`nicole.endejann(@us.dlapiper.com
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket