throbber
Case 2:21-cv-04149-GEKP Document 1 Filed 09/20/21 Page 1 of 12
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
`
`
`
`__________________________________________
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`RYECO, LLC and
`
`
`
`
`:
`T.M. KOVACEVICH - PHILADELPHIA, INC.
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`CORRADO’S SPECIALTY GOODS, INC. t/a
`:
`CORRADO’S FAMILY AFFAIR;
`
`
`:
`GERALD CORRADO, SR., an individual;
`:
`PETER CORRADO, an individual;
`
`:
`JOSEPH CORRADO, an individual;
`
`:
`JAMES J. CORRADO, an individual; and
`
`:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`:
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`:
`__________________________________________:
`
`
`
`Civil Action No.________________
`
` COMPLAINT
`(To Enforce Payment From Produce Trust)
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs, Ryeco, LLC (“Ryeco”) and T.M. Kovacevich - Philadelphia Inc. (“Kovacevich”),
`
`through their undersigned counsel, by way of Complaint against Defendants, Corrado’s Specialty
`
`Goods, Inc. t/a Corrado’s Family Affair (“Specialty Goods”), Gerald Corrado, Sr. (“G. Corrado”), Peter
`
`Corrado (“P. Corrado”), Joseph Corrado (“Joseph Corrado”), and James J. Corrado (“James Corrado”),
`
`state and allege:
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`1.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action under Section 5(c)(5) of the
`
`Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, 7 U.S.C. § 499e(c)(5) (“PACA”), 7 U.S.C. § 499(e)(b), and 28
`
`U.S.C. § 1331. Personal jurisdiction exists over each Defendant as they transact business in this district and
`
`
`- 1 -
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-04149-GEKP Document 1 Filed 09/20/21 Page 2 of 12
`
`have sufficient minimum contacts such that this proceeding does not offend traditional notions of fair play
`
`and justice.
`
`2.
`
`Venue in this District is proper under 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because a substantial part of
`
`Plaintiffs’ claims arose in this District.
`
`
`
`
`
`3.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PARTIES
`
`a.
`
`Plaintiff Ryeco is a Pennsylvania limited liability company with its office and
`
`principal place of business at Philadelphia Wholesale Produce Market, Units C-3 through C-7, 6700
`
`Essington Avenue, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19153. Ryeco is engaged in the business of selling
`
`wholesale quantities of perishable agricultural commodities (“Produce”) and is licensed as a dealer under
`
`PACA.
`
`
`
`b.
`
`Plaintiff Kovacevich is a Pennsylvania corporation with its office and principal place
`
`of business at Philadelphia Wholesale Produce Market, Units A-1 through A-6, 6700 Essington Avenue,
`
`Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19153. Kovacevich is engaged in the business of selling wholesale quantities of
`
`Produce and is licensed as a dealer under PACA.
`
`4.
`
`a.
`
`At all times relevant hereto, Defendant Specialty Goods was and is a New Jersey
`
`corporation with a principal place of business located at 1578 Main Avenue, Clifton, New Jersey 07011,
`
`that was engaged in the business of buying wholesale quantities of Produce in interstate commerce as well
`
`as other specialty goods, and that was operating subject to license as a dealer under PACA.
`
`b.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant G. Corrado was at all relevant times an
`
`owner, officer, and/or director of Defendant Specialty Goods during the period of time in question, who
`
`controlled the operations of Defendant Specialty Goods and was in a position of control over the PACA
`
`trust assets belonging to Plaintiffs. Upon information and belief, G. Corrado resides at 370 Algonquin
`
`Road, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417.
`
`
`- 2 -
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-04149-GEKP Document 1 Filed 09/20/21 Page 3 of 12
`
`
`
`
`
`c.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant P. Corrado was at all relevant times an
`
`owner, officer, and/or director of Defendant Specialty Goods during the period of time in question, who
`
`controlled the operations of Defendant Specialty Goods and was in a position of control over the PACA
`
`trust assets belonging to Plaintiffs. Upon information and belief, P. Corrado resides at 740 Ocean
`
`Boulevard, Sea Bright, New Jersey 07760.
`
`
`
`
`
`d.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant Joseph Corrado was at all relevant times an
`
`owner, officer, and/or director of Defendant Specialty Goods during the period of time in question, who
`
`controlled the operations of Defendant Specialty Goods and was in a position of control over the PACA
`
`trust assets belonging to Plaintiffs. Upon information and belief, Joseph Corrado resides at 297 Crest
`
`Place, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey 07417.
`
`
`
`
`
`e.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant James Corrado was at all relevant times the
`
`person who ordered the Produce at issue and the warehouse manager where product and inventory was
`
`stored for Defendant Specialty Goods during the period of time in question, who controlled the operations
`
`of Specialty Goods and was in a position of control over the PACA trust assets belonging to Plaintiffs.
`
`Upon information and belief, James Corrado resides at 7 Pond VW, Montville, New Jersey 07045-8604.
`
`
`
`
`
`5.
`
`6.
`
`
`
`
`
`ALLEGATIONS COMMON TO ALL COUNTS
`
`This action is brought to enforce the trust provisions of the PACA, 7 U.S.C. § 499e(c).
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant Specialty Goods is the purchasing or procurement
`
`entity for five (5) affiliated supermarkets located in New Jersey that are licensed or operating subject to
`
`license under the PACA as follows: James Corrado, Inc. t/a Corrado’s Family Affair of Clifton, a/t/a
`
`Corrado’s Market; Corrado’s Family Affair of Denville, Inc. t/a Corrado’s Market; Corrado’s Family Affair
`
`of Fairfield, Inc. t/a Corrado’s Market; Corrado’s Family Affair of North Arlington, Inc. t/a Corrado’s
`
`Market; and Corrado’s Family Affair of Wayne, Inc. t/a Corrado’s Market.
`
`
`- 3 -
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-04149-GEKP Document 1 Filed 09/20/21 Page 4 of 12
`
`7.
`
`In calendar year 2021, Plaintiff Ryeco sold and delivered to Defendant Specialty Goods in
`
`excess of $230,000.00 worth of Produce, with Ryeco selling and delivering in excess of 2,000 pounds of
`
`Produce to Specialty Goods on March 20, 2021.
`
`8.
`
`Between April 16, 2021, and July 28, 2021, Plaintiff Ryeco sold and delivered, in interstate
`
`commerce, wholesale amounts of Produce worth the aggregate amount of $296,023.00 to Defendant
`
`Specialty Goods, who accepted the Produce.
`
`9.
`
`Between April 9, 2021, and May 14, 2021, Plaintiff Kovacevich sold and delivered, in
`
`interstate commerce, wholesale amounts of Produce worth the aggregate amount of $163,086.00 to
`
`Defendant Specialty Goods, who accepted the Produce.
`
`10.
`
`At the time Defendant Specialty Goods received and accepted the Produce, Plaintiffs
`
`became beneficiaries in a statutory trust under PACA (the “PACA Trust”), which is designed to assure
`
`payment to Produce suppliers and which consists of all Produce or Produce-related assets, including all
`
`funds commingled with funds from other sources and all assets procured by such funds, in the possession or
`
`control of Defendants.
`
`11.
`
`Plaintiffs timely preserved their respective interests in the PACA Trust in the aggregate
`
`principal amount of $459,109.00 by delivering to Defendant Specialty Goods invoices containing the
`
`requisite statutory language (“Invoices”), and Plaintiffs remain beneficiaries thereof until full payment is
`
`made for the Produce.
`
`12.
`
`Defendants have not disputed the debt owed to Plaintiffs in any way but despite demand for
`
`payment, Defendants have failed to pay Plaintiffs any portion of the aggregate principal amount of
`
`$459,109.00 due and owing for the Produce prior to the filing of this lawsuit.
`
`
`- 4 -
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-04149-GEKP Document 1 Filed 09/20/21 Page 5 of 12
`
`13.
`
`On or about May 26, 2021, Defendant Specialty Goods issued a check, number 146183, to
`
`Plaintiff Ryeco in partial payment of the Produce debt owed in the amount of $11,602.00, but the check was
`
`returned for insufficient funds and has not been made good by Defendant Specialty Goods.1
`
`14.
`
`The failure of Defendant Specialty Goods to pay for the Produce purchased from Plaintiffs,
`
`as well as the issuance of a check to Plaintiff Ryeco returned for insufficient funds, establishes that
`
`Defendants have violated their statutory, regulatory and contractual duties to preserve and turnover the
`
`PACA Trust assets belonging to Plaintiffs by dissipating those assets.
`
`COUNT ONE
`(Failure to Pay Trust Funds – All Defendants)
`
`
`
`15.
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reassert each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 14
`
`of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein.
`
`16.
`
`Defendants’ continuing failure and refusal to pay Plaintiffs the PACA Trust funds in the
`
`aggregate principal amount of $459,109.00 violates PACA and PACA regulations.
`
`17.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of the Defendants’ continuing violations of PACA and
`
`PACA regulations, Plaintiffs have suffered, and are continuing to suffer, damages.
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment against Defendants enforcing payment from the PACA
`
`Trust by ordering Defendants to pay Plaintiffs the aggregate principal amount of $459,109.00 plus interest,
`
`costs, attorneys’ fees, and any other relief deemed just and owing.
`
`COUNT TWO
`(Failure to Pay Promptly- Specialty Goods)
`
`
`
`18.
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reassert each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 17
`
`of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein.
`
`19.
`
`Defendant Specialty Goods received each of the shipments of Produce described above.
`
`
`1 In the event this check is made good, Plaintiff Ryeco will adjust its balance owed accordingly.
`
`- 5 -
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-04149-GEKP Document 1 Filed 09/20/21 Page 6 of 12
`
`20.
`
`The PACA requires Defendant Specialty Goods to tender full payment promptly to its
`
`unpaid suppliers of Produce.
`
`21.
`
`Defendant Specialty Goods failed to pay for the Produce supplied by Plaintiffs within the
`
`payment terms.
`
`22.
`
`As a result of Defendant Specialty Goods’ failure to pay promptly, Plaintiffs have incurred
`
`damages in the aggregate principal amount of $459,109.00.
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment against Defendant Specialty Goods, enforcing prompt
`
`payment from the PACA Trust by ordering Defendant Specialty Goods to pay Plaintiffs as follows:
`
`a.
`
`to pay plaintiff Ryeco the principal amount of $296,023.00 plus interest, costs, attorneys’
`
`fees, and any other relief deemed just and owing.
`
`b.
`
`to pay Plaintiff Kovacevich the principal amount of $163,086.00 plus interest, costs,
`
`attorneys’ fees, and any other relief deemed just and owing.
`
`COUNT THREE
`(Breach of Contract -- Failure to Pay For Goods Sold – Specialty Goods)
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reassert each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through 22
`
`23.
`
`of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein.
`
`24.
`
`Defendant Specialty Goods’ continuing failure and refusal to pay Plaintiffs the full balance
`
`due and owing for the Produce received and accepted by this Defendant constitutes a material breach of the
`
`contracts between Plaintiffs and Defendant Specialty Goods.
`
`25.
`
`As a direct and proximate result of Defendant Specialty Goods’ continuing material
`
`breaches of contracts, Plaintiffs have suffered, and are continuing to suffer, damages.
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment for damages against Defendant Specialty Goods as
`
`follows:
`
`
`- 6 -
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-04149-GEKP Document 1 Filed 09/20/21 Page 7 of 12
`
`a.
`
`in favor of Plaintiff Ryeco in the principal amount of $296,023.00 plus interest, costs,
`
`attorneys’ fees, and any other relief deemed just and owing.
`
`b.
`
`in favor of Plaintiff Kovacevich in the principal amount of $163,086.00 plus interest, costs,
`
`attorneys’ fees, and any other relief deemed just and owing.
`
`COUNT FOUR
`(Unlawful Dissipation of Trust Assets by
`a Corporate Official – G. Corrado)
`
`
`
`26.
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reassert each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 to 25
`
`above as if fully set forth herein.
`
`27.
`
`Defendant, G. Corrado, was a principal of Defendant Specialty Goods who operated the
`
`corporate defendant during the period of time in question or prior thereto and who, upon information and
`
`belief, was in a position of control over the PACA trust assets belonging to Plaintiffs.
`
`28.
`
`Defendant, G. Corrado, failed to direct Specialty Goods to fulfill its statutory duties to
`
`preserve PACA Trust assets and pay Plaintiffs for the Produce supplied.
`
`29.
`
`Defendant, G. Corrado, knew or should have known that Defendant Specialty Goods was in
`
`breach of the PACA Trust.
`
`30.
`
`Defendant G. Corrado’s failure to direct Defendant Specialty Goods to maintain PACA
`
`Trust assets and pay Plaintiffs for the Produce supplied was an unlawful dissipation of trust assets by a
`
`corporate official.
`
`31.
`
`32.
`
`Defendant, G. Corrado, participated in the breach of the PACA Trust by Specialty Goods.
`
`As a result of said unlawful dissipation of trust assets, Plaintiffs have been deprived of their
`
`rights as beneficiaries in the Produce trust and have been denied payment for the Produce supplied.
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request judgment against Defendant, Gerald Corrado, Sr., as follows:
`
`
`- 7 -
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-04149-GEKP Document 1 Filed 09/20/21 Page 8 of 12
`
` a.
`
`in favor of Plaintiff Ryeco in the principal amount of $296,023.00 plus interest, costs,
`
`attorneys’ fees, and any other relief deemed just and owing.
`
`b.
`
`in favor of Plaintiff Kovacevich in the principal amount of $163,086.00 plus interest, costs,
`
`attorneys’ fees, and any other relief deemed just and owing.
`
`COUNT FIVE
`(Unlawful Dissipation of Trust Assets by
`a Corporate Official – P. Corrado)
`
`
`
`33.
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reassert each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 to 32
`
`above as if fully set forth herein.
`
`34.
`
`Defendant, P. Corrado, was a principal of Defendant Specialty Goods who operated the
`
`corporate defendant during the period of time in question or prior thereto and who, upon information and
`
`belief, was in a position of control over the PACA Trust assets belonging to Plaintiffs.
`
`35.
`
`Defendant, P. Corrado, failed to direct Defendant Specialty Goods to fulfill its statutory
`
`duties to preserve PACA Trust assets and pay Plaintiffs for the Produce supplied.
`
`36.
`
`Defendant, P. Corrado, knew or should have known that Defendant Specialty Goods was in
`
`breach of the PACA Trust.
`
`37.
`
`Defendant P. Corrado’s failure to direct Defendant Specialty Goods to maintain PACA trust
`
`assets and pay Plaintiffs for the Produce supplied was an unlawful dissipation of trust assets by a corporate
`
`official.
`
`38.
`
`39.
`
`Defendant P. Corrado participated in the breach of the PACA Trust by Specialty Goods.
`
`As a result of said unlawful dissipation of trust assets, Plaintiffs have been deprived of their
`
`rights as beneficiaries in the Produce trust and have been denied payment for the Produce supplied.
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request judgment against Defendant, Peter Corrado, as follows:
`
`
`- 8 -
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-04149-GEKP Document 1 Filed 09/20/21 Page 9 of 12
`
`a.
`
`in favor of Plaintiff Ryeco in the principal amount of $296,023.00 plus interest, costs,
`
`attorneys’ fees, and any other relief deemed just and owing.
`
`b.
`
`in favor of Plaintiff Kovacevich in the principal amount of $163,086.00 plus interest, costs,
`
`attorneys’ fees, and any other relief deemed just and owing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COUNT SIX
`(Unlawful Dissipation of Trust Assets by
`a Corporate Official – Joseph Corrado)
`
`
`
`
`
`40.
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reassert each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 to 39
`
`above as if fully set forth herein.
`
`41.
`
`Defendant, Joseph Corrado, was a principal of Defendant Specialty Goods who operated the
`
`corporate defendant during the period of time in question or prior thereto and who, upon information and
`
`belief, was in a position of control over the PACA Trust assets belonging to Plaintiffs.
`
`42.
`
`Defendant, Joseph Corrado, failed to direct Defendant Specialty Goods to fulfill its statutory
`
`duties to preserve PACA Trust assets and pay Plaintiffs for the Produce supplied.
`
`43.
`
`Defendant Joseph Corrado knew or should have known that Defendant Specialty Goods was
`
`in breach of the PACA Trust.
`
`44.
`
`Defendant Joseph Corrado’s failure to direct Defendant Specialty Goods to maintain PACA
`
`trust assets and pay Plaintiffs for the Produce supplied was an unlawful dissipation of trust assets by a
`
`corporate official.
`
`45.
`
`46.
`
`Defendant Joseph Corrado participated in the breach of the PACA trust by Specialty Goods.
`
`As a result of said unlawful dissipation of trust assets, Plaintiffs have been deprived of their
`
`rights as beneficiaries in the Produce trust and have been denied payment for the Produce supplied.
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request judgment against Defendant, Joseph Corrado, as follows:
`
`
`- 9 -
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-04149-GEKP Document 1 Filed 09/20/21 Page 10 of 12
`
`a.
`
`in favor of Plaintiff Ryeco in the principal amount of $296,023.00 plus interest, costs,
`
`attorneys’ fees, and any other relief deemed just and owing.
`
`b.
`
`in favor of Plaintiff Kovacevich in the principal amount of $163,086.00 plus interest, costs,
`
`attorneys’ fees, and any other relief deemed just and owing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COUNT SEVEN
`(Unlawful Dissipation of Trust Assets by
`a Corporate Official – James Corrado)
`
`
`
`
`
`47.
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reassert each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 to 46
`
`above as if fully set forth herein.
`
`48.
`
`Defendant, James Corrado, was the person who ordered the unpaid Produce at issue and the
`
`warehouse or distribution center manager of Defendant Specialty Goods, who operated the corporate
`
`defendant during the period of time in question and who, upon information and belief, was in a position of
`
`control over the PACA trust assets belonging to Plaintiffs.
`
`49.
`
`Defendant, James Corrado, failed to direct Defendant Specialty Goods to fulfill its statutory
`
`duties to preserve PACA trust assets and pay Plaintiffs for the Produce supplied.
`
`50.
`
`Defendant James Corrado knew or should have known that Defendant Specialty Goods was
`
`in breach of the PACA trust.
`
`51.
`
`Defendant, James Corrado’s, failure to direct Defendant Specialty Goods to maintain PACA
`
`trust assets and pay Plaintiffs for the Produce supplied was an unlawful dissipation of trust assets by a
`
`corporate official.
`
`52.
`
`Defendant James Corrado participated in the breach of the PACA trust by Defendant
`
`Specialty Goods.
`
`53.
`
`As a result of said unlawful dissipation of trust assets, Plaintiffs have been deprived of their
`
`rights as beneficiaries in the Produce trust and have been denied payment for the Produce supplied.
`
`
`- 10 -
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-04149-GEKP Document 1 Filed 09/20/21 Page 11 of 12
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request judgment against Defendant, James Corrado, as follows:
`
`a.
`
`in favor of Plaintiff Ryeco in the principal amount of $296,023.00 plus interest, costs,
`
`attorneys’ fees, and any other relief deemed just and owing.
`
`b.
`
`in favor of Plaintiff Kovacevich in the principal amount of $163,086.00 plus interest, costs,
`
`attorneys’ fees, and any other relief deemed just and owing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`54.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COUNT EIGHT
`(Interest and Attorneys’ Fees – All Defendants)
`
`Plaintiffs repeat and reassert each and every allegation contained in paragraphs 1 through
`
`53 of this Complaint as if fully set forth herein.
`
`55.
`
`PACA, 41 Pa. Stat. § 202, and the Invoices at issue entitle Plaintiff Ryeco to recover interest
`
`at the rate of six percent (6%) per annum plus costs and attorney’s fees in the event that Defendants violate
`
`their obligations by failing to pay Plaintiff Ryeco for the Produce sold to Defendant Specialty Goods.
`
`56.
`
`PACA and the Invoices at issue entitle Plaintiff Kovacevich to recover interest at the rate of
`
`18% per annum plus costs and attorney’s fees in the event that Defendants violate their obligations by
`
`failing to pay Plaintiff Kovacevich for the Produce and other items sold to Defendant Specialty Goods.
`
`57.
`
`The continuing failure and refusal to pay Plaintiffs the aggregate principal amount of
`
`$459,109.00 due and owing for the Produce sold to and accepted by Defendant Specialty Goods entitles
`
`Plaintiffs to recover interest, costs, and attorney’s fees incurred in enforcing the PACA Trust.
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment against all Defendants, jointly and severally, for
`
`prejudgment interest, costs, attorneys’ fees, and any other relief deemed just and owing.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- 11 -
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-04149-GEKP Document 1 Filed 09/20/21 Page 12 of 12
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket