throbber
NO.: 17/8000
`
`IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
`
`Sororazam Bethune - Petitioner
`
`VS.
`
`MTA Long Island Bus - Respondent.
`
`PETITIONER'S REPLY TO DEFENDANTS
`
`OPPOSITION BRIEF
`
`PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
`
`Prose
`fne.
`YMCA-Samaritan Village, Van Siclen Shelter
`89-25 Parsons Blvd., No. 534
`Jamaica, New York 11432
`Tel. No.: 516-423-0608
`
`

`

`QUESTIONS PRESENTED
`
`Obstruction of Justice during Nov. 5,
`2015 Liability Trial by Sup. Ct., NC.
`
`Mis-Representation, Legal Malpractice;
`By my attorney not filing papers on time, and
`dismissing my case for untimely filing of:
`"OSC", Untimely Appeal from the 4/22/2016
`Judgment.
`
`Facts of my Permanent Irreversible
`Debilitating Injuries, Surgeries, Loss of
`Abilities, Real Estate Business and Real
`Estate Income; Hope and Motivation; Pain
`and Suffering; and
`
`FEDERAL QUESTION: There is OCNFLICT
`between Court of Appeal's Decision dated
`Sept. 8, 2016 and App. Div. 2ndJ.D. Decision
`dated June 30, 2016; specifically the Court of
`Appeals Decision dated Sept. 8, 2016 stating:
`
`"Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to
`appeal from the June 2016 Appellate
`Division Order, dismissed upon the
`Order does Not finally Determine the
`Action within the Meaning of the
`Constitution.".
`
`MTA did not file Answer on time in Nov. 2012;
`MTA filed answer TWO years later in Nov.
`2014; Armienti et al. backdated it to Nov. 2012.
`
`MTA did not produce the Latino Driver who
`injured, crippled me life time; affected my
`children detrimentally. MTA / MTA attorneys
`could have produced the Latino Driver who
`injured me, but manipulated, Mis-represented
`facts decided Not to, in order to dismiss my
`and
`surgeries
`injuries,
`permanent
`disabilities.
`
`ii
`
`Nor
`
`

`

`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`JURISDICTION
`There is a CONFLICT between the Court of Appeals'
`September 8, 2016 Decision with respect to App. Div.
`2nd J.D. Decision dated June 30, 2016.
`
`A. The Clerk at Court of Appeals, Albany, NY, advised
`me that I could make a Motion to the United States
`Supreme Court in Washington D.C.
`
`II. CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY
`PROVISIONS INVOLVED
`Obstruction of Justice.
`
`Legal Malpractice by my attorney.
`
`Permanent Irreversible Disabilities.
`Federal Question (Conflict).
`MTA did not file "Answer" in 2012.
`MTA did not produce the Latino Driver.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`PAGE
`
`1
`
`2-3
`
`3
`
`3
`
`4
`
`4
`
`5
`
`5
`
`6
`
`6
`
`III. STATEMENTS OF FACTS
`
`Justice Angela lannaci's Order Dated July 6,
`2015; Entered July 8, 2015 Denied Def.'s Motion
`for Summary Judgment, found the Driver "Negligent".
`
`OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE DURING NOV. 5,
`2015 ]ABILITY TRIAL: Approx. 2.5 Hours of Threats.
`
`Michael Paglino's Jan. 7, 2016 Affm. Par. 26.
`
`Justice Feinman Disclosure Re MTA case when
`After years of Litigation Plaintiff passed away.
`
`Mr. Paglino using Vanessa Corchia's Slandering
`Strategy against injured plaintiffs.
`
`I was injured on Aug. 24, 2011 before MTA L.I. Bus
`Discharged MTA on Dec. 30, 2011.
`
`Stuart A. Jackson, my attorney called me last week
`In April, 2016, told me that MTA had filed Money
`Judgment of $1200, told me I did not have to pay, and
`that he was going to file appeal from the Judgment.
`
`--------.
`
`Iii F
`
`3
`
`

`

`I. There is Question of Federal Law and Question of
`Law for this Court's Review of Petition and Motion.
`
`J. Michael Paglino is making manipulative, false,
`misleading statements; and not disclosing my
`communication with the App. Div. 2nd J. D.
`Regarding my. attorney's Release.
`
`K. My daughter was represented by same attorney in
`Her Injury cases at:
`"NUMC" municipality hospital;
`Brunswick Hospital,
`both cases dismissed in Sup. Ct. N.C., and at
`App. Div. 2nd J.D. due to Mis-representation.
`
`L. Michael Paglino in his Opposition Brief, Pg.: 14
`Degrading a person with disabilities:
`"This is simply, a matter of Unsuccessful Litigant".
`
`M. Eardrum Rupture, Tinnitus by ENT, Dr. Monhian .
`Responding to Michael Paglino Slandering me.
`
`N. Dr. Monhian's Medical Records Admitting Negligence.
`
`0. Dr. Monhian's Attorney, Denise Buda stated:
`"Your only Remedy is to sue your attorney for legal
`Malpractice".
`
`Eviction Case: Mayfield no longer funding; I offered
`To Court and Landlord to place a Lien against my
`Lawsuit for owed amount plus interest, and let me
`and my daughter stay for Lease Term, but Landlord
`did not agree.
`
`Defendant's attorney in his Opposition Brief: Pg.: 11,
`states that Court of Appeals dismissed my case on
`Sept. 12, 2017. However, he manipulates and does not
`disclose to this Court that App. Div. 2nd J.D.'s Order
`dated August 17, 2017 (APPENDIX NO. 6) did not
`permit my Appeal to the Court of Appeals, and that
`Court of Appeals could not review my case 2' time
`Without Permission by App. Div. 21u J. D.
`IV. CONCLUSION
`
`7
`
`7
`
`8-9
`
`9
`
`9
`
`10
`
`10
`
`11
`
`11
`
`12
`
`L~
`
`

`

`APPENDIX INDEX:
`
`APPENDIX NO. 1:
`
`Michael Paglino's Affm. 01/07/2016: Par: 26:
`
`APPENDIX NO. 2:
`
`MARLO POLESE'S AFF. DATED DEC. 29, 2015.
`
`APPENDIX NO. 3:
`
`Vanessa Corchia Affirmations attached to Michael
`Paglino's Brief Opposition dated 04/05/2018 as
`APPENDIX Nos: 16 and 19.
`
`APPENDIX NO. 4:
`
`Stuart A. Jackson's Letter asking App. Div. 2nd J.D.
`for a Hearing which was rejected by the App. Div.
`2nd J.D,; and letters between App. Div.2dJ.D.,
`myself & Stuart A. Jackson re Discharge.
`
`APPENDIX: NO. 5:
`
`Affs. Dated June 30, 2017 Pg: 10; and July 16, 2017
`Pg: 5; asking Court to let us stay at the Apt. and
`place a Lien by Landlord for Months of unpaid
`Rent; and any future rent including Interest, but
`Landlord and Court did not agree.
`
`APPENDIX NO. 6:
`
`Appellate Division Second J.D. Dec. Dated July 17,
`Not Permitting Appeal to Court, of Appeal
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CITED
`
`CASES:
`
`PAGE NO.
`
`Justice Angella lannacci's Order Entered07/08/2015:
`
`3
`
`Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [19801).
`
`Urquhart v New York City Transit Auth., 85 NY2d 828 [1995].
`
`I?A
`
`$
`
`

`

`STATUTES AND RULES:
`
`FEDERAL QUESTION: there is a CONFLICT between Court
`
`Of Appeal's Decision dated Sept. 8, 21016; and Appellate Div.
`
`Decision dated June 30, 2016 (Dismissing the Action due to
`
`Untimely Appeal) disregarding the fact that I was Mis-
`
`represented by my attorney. Court of Appeals stating:
`
`"Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the
`June 2016 Appellate Division• Order, dismissed
`upon the order does not finally determine the
`action within the meaning of the Constitution."
`
`LAW QUESTION: my injuries were not resolvedbased on facts
`of my injuries; based on Mis-representation and Legal Mal-
`practice; based on having testified on Nov. 5, 2015- under stress
`having chest pains and head pressure, caused by Justice
`Feinman's threats before trial; I was forced to testify and not
`allowed to talk to my attorney when I asked court several
`times.; and based- on MTA not file Answer in 2012; Not
`Producing the Latino Driver who injured me
`
`Vi
`
`.' -----
`
`on
`
`

`

`I
`
`)
`
`IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE
`UNITED STATES, WASHINGTON D.C.
`PETITIONER'S REPLY TO DEFENDANT'S
`BRIEF IN OPPOSITION
`
`I
`
`JURISDICTION
`
`The United States Supreme Court has Jurisdiction regarding my case and
`
`there is merit to review my petition and my motion. There is a Question of
`
`Federal Law.
`
`There is a CONFLICT between the Court of Appeals'
`
`September 8, 2016 Decision with respect to App. Div. 2nd J.D. Decision dated
`
`June 30, 2016 which dismissed my appeal due to Untimely Appeal, which
`
`was caused by my attorney, Stuart A. Jackson, Mis-Representing me. Court
`
`of Appeals, Albany, NYS, Decision Dated September 8, 2016 stated:
`
`"Motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the June
`30, 2016 App. Div. 2nd J.D. Order, dismissed upon the
`order does not finally determine the action within the
`meaning of the Constitution.".
`
`•
`
`A. The Clerk at Court of Appeals, Albany, NY, advised me that
`
`I could make a Motion to the United States Supreme Court
`
`in Washington D.C. I started filing Petition and Motion.
`
`MTA / MTA Attorneys did not produce the LATINO DRIVER who injured
`
`me, they produced a White driver, Mr. Epstein, he was not the driver who
`
`injured me.
`
`'
`
`APPENDIX NO. 2: MTA - Màrlô Pole si'sAFF. 12/29/2015.'
`
`

`

`3. MTA arg•ucd that since Mr. Greenidge, MTA Mgr. in charge of both incidents
`
`in 2011, and. the Latino Bus driver who injured me work for now "Viola"
`
`corporation that MTA could not produce them. BUT MTA produced .MR.
`
`Epstein who worked for MTA Long Island Bus during. 2011 until December,
`
`2011; and Mr. Epstein worked thereafter, Effective Dec. 30, 2011 worked for
`
`Viola Bus N.C. due to transition. Mr. Epstein during his EBT, testified that
`
`during 2011 until Dec. 2011, he worked for MTA Long Island Bus, and in
`
`Dec., 2011 when N.C. released MTA, formed its own "Viola" Corp., that he
`
`has been working for Viola Bus. Since Dec. 30, 2011. Mr. Epstein said that
`
`•
`
`he received a Letter from James Dunning, ESQ., Armienti, et al. to testify for
`
`at EBT and Trial for MTA.
`
`II. CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY
`PROVISIONS INVOLVED
`
`Obstruction of Justice during Nov. 5, 2015 Liability Trial by Sup. Ct., NC.
`
`Mis-Representation, Legal Malpractice by my attorney; untimely filing of
`
`"OSC", not filing Notice of Appeal from the 4/22/2016 Judgment.
`
`Facts of my Permanent Irreversible Debilitating Injuries, Surgeries, Loss of
`
`Hope, Real Estate Business and Income; Pain and Suffering.
`
`2.
`
`

`

`FEDERAL QUESTION: There is CONFLICT between Court of Appeal's
`
`Decision dated Sept. 8, 2016 and App. Div. 2'J.D. Dec. dated June 30, 2016;
`
`specifically the Court of Appeals Decision dated Sept. 8, 2016 stating:
`
`"Motimi, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal from the June 2016
`Appellate Division Order, dismissed upon the Order does Not
`finally Determine the Action within the Meaning of the
`Constitution.".
`
`MTA did nct file Answer in Nov. 2012 at Nassau County Clerk's Office. I
`
`was not served with MTA's Answer in 2012. Their Answer was not attached
`
`to any motion during period 2012 to 2014; MTA filed Answer two (2) years
`
`later in Nov. 2014; Armienti Et al backdated it to Nov., 2012.
`
`MTA did not produce the Latino Driver who injured, crippled me life time;
`
`affected my children detrimentally.
`
`'III. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
`
`B. Justice Angela lannaci's Order Dated July 6, 2015;
`Entered July 8, 2015 Denied Def.'s Motion for 'Summary
`Judgment, stated:
`
`"The Defendant has failed to establish its entitlement to
`judgment as a matter of law because it failed to present any
`evidence that the bus driver operating the bus at the time of
`the alleged incident was free of negligence (see Zuckerman v.
`City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [19801). In any event, the
`plaintiff submitted sufficient evidence to create a triable issue
`as to whether her fall was caused by a sudden and violent
`jerking motion of the bus (Urquhart v New York City Transit
`Auth., 85 NY2d 828 [1995]. Accordingly, the motion is denied.".
`
`

`

`OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE BEFORE AND DURING
`NOV. 5, 2015 LIABILITY TRIAL:
`
`I asked three different times to talk to my attorney but court did
`not allow.
`
`In his affirmation, Jan. 7, 2016, Par:: 26, Michael Paglino
`states the following:
`
`.
`
`"26. In addition, during cross-examination, of the bus
`operator, Mr. Epstein, Plaintiff blurred out the following
`from where she was seated in the courtroom:
`
`.
`
`THE COURT: Hold on one second.
`THE WITNESS: Mr. Jackson? Mr. Jackson?
`Excuse me: Can I speak to my
`attorney?
`THE COURT: Not right now.
`THE WITNESS: Can I give him a Note?
`THE CLERK: Not Now. '
`
`EXHIBIT "C" at P. 92. ".
`
`APPENDIX NO. 1: Michael Paglino's Affm. Jan. 7, 2016: Par: 26:
`
`4. During the 2.5 hours threats made by Sup. Ct. Justice Feinman on Nov. 5,
`
`2015, after my attorney rejected Justice Feinman's low offer not consistent
`
`with my permanent irreversible injuries, Justice Feinman asked me and my
`
`attorney, Stuart A. Jackson, to go to his Chamber. Justice Feinman asked
`
`me about my real estate success. I was crying and told him that I had
`
`become very successful, that I loved real estate and I was planning to have
`
`my own real estate office hiring agents, expanding my business He said he
`
`liked that I worked hard and he added $10,000.00 at $100,000.00. My
`
`attorney rejected.
`
`Justice Feinman became furious started yelling at me:
`
`4.
`
`.
`
`..
`
`

`

`"Main, take the offer while you can. If you don't take it I
`make sure you don't get anything, I have the authority to
`dismiss your case even if Jury returns verdict for you. ".
`
`I was crying, having chest pains; Justice Feinman laughed:
`
`"Let me tell you about a case I had involving MTA, I was the
`trial Judge. The Petitioner was sitting on a chair. The jury
`returned verdict at $3 Million. Of course I told MTA to
`appeal. It took years for the App. Div. to make a decision
`reducing the Jury's amount to $1 Million. But by the time
`funds were ready for the plaintiff, he had died. He never
`collected the money. Listen to me carefully, take the offer
`or you are going to end up dead like that plaintiff.".
`
`5. It was not a laughing matter, my attorney was shaking his head and I was
`
`crying, having chest pains and head pressure, I felt horrible for that plaintiff
`
`who died due to years of litigation, sitting on a chair, :pain and suffering,
`
`financial problems, his family probably affected, which is the saddest of all.
`
`Mr. Paglino copying Vanessa Corchia's "Slandering"
`Method/Strategy in her motion to Court of Appeals to
`dismiss my appeal to Court of Appeal; in his Opposition
`• Brief, Pg. 20, Par. 1 states the following slandering stated
`• by Vanessa COrchia in her Motions to Court of Appeals and
`Appellate Div. 211d J D stating
`
`"Unfortunately, Plaintiff is no
`stranger to the litigation system.".
`
`Michael Paglino's Brief Opposition dated April 5, 2018;
`Appendix No. 19: Vanessa Corchia, Esq., Partner at Armienti et
`al., Vanessa Corchia's Affm. Pg. 14, Par.' 49, states the same:
`
`"Unfortunately, Plaintiff is no'
`stranger to the litigation system.".
`
`APPENDIX NO. 3: Vanessa Corchia Affirmations and Michael
`Paglino's Brief Opposition dated 04/05/2018.
`
`5
`
`'
`
`''
`
`'•
`
`',•,,
`
`i(
`
`

`

`6• Arrtheti, EtAl unethically keep Slandering me just like they slander many
`
`other injured plaintiffs preying for them to dismiss the case without liability.
`
`They are not Implementing Justice, they are against justice. I am hoping
`
`that the United States Supreme Court Washington D.C. will review my
`
`Petition and Motion and Justice will prevail.
`
`7. Vanessa Corchia, Esq. also Partner at Armienti Law firm for years worked
`
`at Appelliate Division 2nd J.D. and now she works for Armienti, et al.
`
`She
`
`kept slandering me just like Michael Paglino (Copying her slandering me in
`
`his Brief Oppossition); accusing me of Threatening MTA Attorneys? As far as
`
`I know 1 aIn the only injured crippled individual here having lost everything,
`
`I am the only loser here. 'I don't see Vanessa Corchiaoi' Michael Paglino
`
`with injuries, pain and suffering. I don't understand what they mean by
`
`stating to Court of Appeals and Appellate' Div. repeatedly that I am
`
`91
`
`targeting MTA and MTA attorneys. If anyone being targeted is me having
`
`permanent injuries, crippled in life, having lost everything, not them.
`
`G. I was injured by MTA Long Island Bus on August 24, 2011,
`Before MTA Long Island Bus ceased Operations as of Dec.
`31, 2011; I was injured by MTA Long Island Bus.
`
`APPENDIX NO. 2: MarIo Pólesi, MTA Internal Attorney Aff.: Dec.. 29, 2015.
`
`'H. My attorney then, Stuart A. Jackson, 'called me last week
`in April of 2016, telling me that MTA had filed, money
`judgment of $1200, he said I didn't have to pay, that he was
`going to file appeal from Judgment.
`
`I 0a
`
`

`

`8. He did not file, he dismissed my Permanent injuries, pain, suffering. With
`
`respect to Order to Show Cause, (to set aside Jury's Verdict Coitt.rary to the
`
`wight of the Evidence for the interest of Justice CPLR 4404; Post Trial, my
`
`attorney had no idea about OSC after Jury's Verdict and 15 day limitation
`
`I. There is Question of Law for this Court's Review; there
`is Question of Federal Law for this Court's Review.
`
`9. The Sup. Ct. dismissed my injuries, and then App. Div. 2nd J.D. permitted me
`
`to file Untimely Appeal due to Mis-Representation; giving me a NEW
`
`DOCKET NO.; 2016-11032. I filed untimely notice of Appeal on Sept. 18,
`
`2616; an was informed I had six (6) months tofilé my Brief. Thereafter,
`
`since 'Vanessa Corchia, objected and App. Div. dismissed my Appeal;
`
`APPENDIX NO. 6: App. Div. 2nd J.D. Order dated AUG. 17, 2017.
`
`J. Michael Paglino is making manipulative, false, misleading
`statements not disclosing my communication with the App.
`Div. 2nd J.D. which communication (letters) MTA attorneys.
`were sent copies of same:
`
`10.1 called the Deputy Clerk at Appellate Division 2nd J.D. asked him if 'I could
`
`rele'ae my attorney. 'I also 'asked him to watch the video tape of the 18t MTA
`
`case (V11/2,011) when thy left foot Was injured, that during the Oral
`
`Arguméit Stuart A. Jackson, was making inappropriategestures and shapes
`
`with his 'hands towards the Justices getting then angry.
`
`'...
`
`'..
`
`:'
`
`.
`
`

`

`11.During the Oral Arguments of all Cases, we were called last and he was
`
`angry and was being totally inappropriate and disrespectful to the four
`
`Justices, Lwas asking him to please not point fingers or make shapes with
`
`his fiuigers towards the Four (4) Justices, but he was out of control and angry.
`
`The Appellate Div. 2nd J.D. Deputy Clerk then directed me as to how to
`
`discharge my attorney, told me had to send letters by mail to App. Div. 2'
`
`J.D. to both my attorney and to App. Division releasing my attorney.
`
`Stuart A. Jackson, my attorney sent a letter back to the Appellate Div. 2I
`
`J.D. stating that he could understand why I was discharging him. But that
`he wanted to have a hearing on my daughter's 2 Cases at App. Div. 2fid J.D.
`
`-
`
`asking for a hearing to keep my daughter's cases; he knew I had power of
`
`attorney and Healthcare proxy signed by my daughter, executed by an
`
`attorney, designating me as her authorized agent/representative
`
`APPENDIX NO. 4: Letters/ Communication Re: I Attorney Release
`
`K. My daughter's 2 Injury eases: Nassau County, NY, against
`"NUMC" hospital and "Brunswick Hospital were both
`dismissed at Sup. Ct.; App.Div. 2uJ.D. for Legal
`Malpractice.
`
`(i) Tessa Bethune v. Nassau University Medical Center Hospital
`('NUMC") Municipality Hospital; lApp.Div. 2nd J.D. Docket No.:
`2015-07566: and Sup. Ct. Index No.: 010750-14 filed inNov. 1,
`the injuries happened during June 20, 2014 to July,
`2014 -
`2014, involving attack, overmedication. Stuart A. Jackson did
`
`8
`
`'cr1
`
`

`

`not know that "NUMC" was a municipality hospital and did not
`file a. Notice of Claim, he filed Summons and Complaint.
`
`(ii) Tessa Bethune v. Brunswick Hospital; . involving brain injury
`and cervical sprain - Stuart A. Jackson, Esq. did not open the
`Opposition Papers from the Hospital Attorneys, did not
`respond on time several times, and the Sup. Ct. Justice
`dismissed the Case; I appealed. on behalf of my daughter. It
`was dismissed at. App.. Div. since Stuart A. Jackson, did not
`appeal properly, did not communicate with Hospital attorneys.
`
`APPENDIX NO. 4: Stuart A. Jackson's Letter asking App. Div. 2nd
`J.D. for .a Hearing which was rejected by the App. Div. 2nd J.D: and
`letters/ Communication with App.Div.2nd J.D. re Attorney Discharge.
`
`L. Defendant's Attorney, Michael Paglino in his Opposition
`Brief; Page: 14, Degrading a Disabled Person, by stating:
`
`•
`
`"This is simply a matter of an Unsuccessful litigant
`seeking to avail herself of further appellate review
`for what she perceived a wrongs committed
`against her, but which were not established.".
`
`M Sororazam Bethune V. Mónhian, Nathan, MD: This is the
`first time I was injured in my life and since Michael
`Paglino unethically gathering my injuries to dismiss my
`case again, so I have to explain:
`
`14.1 had Earache, visited Dr. Monhian on July 2, 2010. He looked very tired,
`
`and he was busy talking to two female Re Cosmetic Plastic Surgeries; yelled:
`
`"Who gave you my name, I don't know you" in a negative
`manner. I said: "Mitra, your client, she is a Jewish Real
`Estate Broker in Great Neck." He said: "Oh yes I treated her
`daughter".
`
`15.He examined my right ear said thresvas no infection, he examined my left
`
`ear, when he pushed the medical equipment into my left ear too far, and
`
`caused excoriating pain, due to which I Instantly screamed due to
`
`9
`
`, (y
`
`

`

`excruciating pain affecting my brain awfully crying so loud that all the
`
`assistant came to the examining room immediately. Same day, July 2, 2010
`
`Dr. Monhian gave me a Drop medication (which I found out months after
`
`injuries that it had been prohibited by FDA not to put the drop inside the ear
`
`for it could cause permanent injuries, FDA advising Doctors and healthcare
`
`professionals to warn patients that it was for external use not internal use.
`
`16. On Oct. 1, 2010 suddenly there was an extreme high impact in my left ear it
`
`closed to the outside world suddenly, and I had High Pitch sounds of Cricket
`
`sounds, wires intercepting sounds, water fall sounds, which were very
`
`disturbing. I kept walking up and down my apt. trying to figure out these
`
`disturbing sounds. I was crying, I could not hear from my left ear.
`
`N. Dr. Monhian in his Medical Records submitted to Courts
`dated October 21, 2010 states:
`
`"Hearing Loss, Tinnitus in left ear for Last Three weeks".
`
`17.Admitting I was injured three months after his treatment / prescription use
`prescribed on July 2, 2010; injured under his NEGLIGENT Care.".
`
`0. DENISE BUDA, ESQ.; PARTNER, Representing Dr. Nathan
`Monhian, MD, during our last Tel. Conversation told me:
`
`"Your only Remedy' is to sue your attorney for legal
`malpractice.".
`
`I TOLD MS. DENISE BUDA, ESQ., PARTNER:
`
`"STUART A. JACKSON WAS NOT OK, BUT
`HE DID NOT INJURE ME, DR. MONHIAN DID".
`
`10
`
`

`

`Sororazam Bethune v. Shelton Properties, CT I have stated
`previously to this Court that Mayfield Funding stopped
`helping me with my expenses including Rent effective
`December, 2016. I still had funds and I paid substantial
`security at Lease 'Signing renting the" two bedroom 2 bath
`Apt. 1' was negotiating- with Mayfield. 'to fund my cases for
`year 2017. I paid $4,540.00 two months security and one
`month rent for Feb. at $2,270.00. I ran out of funds.
`18. My. daughter was very upset due to eviction, crying, not having a place to
`live. She was hospitalized repeatedly, at Belleview 09/12/2017-10/25/2017;
`
`NW Medical Ctr: 11/12/2017-11/21/2017; Westchester Prespetarian Hospital
`
`in White Plains, NY: 11/22/2017-12/7/2017; South Oak Hospital: 12/13/2017-
`
`Present (My daughter was transferred by South Oak Hospital to Pilgrim
`
`State Hospital March 13, 2018-Present, she is at Pilgrim now, and they'll be
`
`transferring her to a Community Residence if I don't provide a Lease" for
`
`them soon I have a NYC partial Voucher but buildings require full voucher.
`
`APPENDiX: NO. Th Affs. (Pages) Dated June 30.200 Pg: 10; and July 16, 2017 Pg:
`5; asking Court to let us stay at the Apt, and place a Lien b.yjAndlord for Owed
`Rent plus interest against my lawsuit.
`
`Def.'s Attorney in his Opposition Brief states on Page '11
`that Court of Appeals dismissed my case on Sept. 12, 2017.
`However, Michael Paglino as usual manipulating facts, he
`does not explain that the Appellate Div. 2nd J. D. in its Aug.
`17, 2017 Order did not Permit Court of Appeals to accept
`my Appel; Court of Appeals' 09/12/2017 Dec. rejected my
`Appeal.
`
`.
`
`'.
`
`APPENDIX NO. 6: Appellate Division Second J.D. Dec. Dated AUGUST
`17, 2017 Not Permitting Appeal from Court of Appeals.
`
`11
`
`

`

`IV. CONCLUSION
`
`I don't understand why I was injured repeatedly I've been searching for answers in
`
`my mind and I cannot find any answers. I did not do anything wrong to deserve
`
`crippling disabilities, pain, suffering. My heart falls apart when I think about the
`
`detrimental impacts on my children, caused by these injuries and disabilities. I
`
`wanted to help them succeed in life, my daughter's goal was to get her PhD, work at
`
`a University. I am respectfully requesting the United States Supreme Court that
`
`my petition and motion be granted for the interest of justice together with
`
`appointment of an attorney to represent me for my permanent irreversible
`
`debilitating injuries, surgeries, disabilities, pain and suffering, loss of everything;
`
`with any other relief this court may decide just and proper.
`
`DATED: May _—ql,2018
`New York
`
`By:___________
`Sororazam Bethune, Petitioner, Pro Se
`sarabethunerealty@yahoo.com
`516-423-0608
`YMCA - Van Siklen-Samaritan Village Shelter
`89-2& Parsons Blvd., No. 534
`Jamaica, New York 11423
`
`Sworn to before me this
`7t' ate of, /2'?GJ/' 2018
`
`YPUBIC
`
`TO: Michael Paglino, Esq.
`Armienti, DeBellis, Et Al.
`170 Old Country Road, No. 607
`Mineola, New York 11501
`
`I
`
`LYNN J MOESSNER
`Notary Public, State of New York
`No. 01M04970982
`Qualified in Nassau County
`My Commission Expires 8/20120-1-tf,
`
`Word Count: 2999.
`
`12
`
`F'
`
`

`

`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket