throbber
No. 18-956
`
`In the
`Supreme Court of the United States
`
`GooGle llC,
`
`v.
`oraCle ameriCa, iNC.
`
`Petitioner,
`
`Respondent.
`
`On Writ Of CertiOrari tO the United StateS
`COUrt Of appealS fOr the federal CirCUit
`
`Brief for international Business
`Machines corp. and red hat, inc. as
`Amici curiAe supporting petitioner
`
`mIchelle h. bRoWDy
`maRK J. RInGes
`Ibm coRPoRatIon
`one New orchard road
`armonk, NY 10504
`
`steven m. PuRDy
`Ibm coRPoRatIon
`P.o. Box 218
`1101 Kitchawan road
`Yorktown Heights, NY 10598
`
`James W. Dabney
`Counsel of Record
`RIchaRD m. Koehl
`James R. KlaIbeR
`stefanIe m. GaRIbyan
`huGhes hubbaRD & ReeD llP
`one Battery Park Plaza
`New York, NY 10004
`(212) 837-6000
`james.dabney@hugheshubbard.com
`
`thomas I. savaGe
`JeffRey R. Kaufman
`maRK f. bohannon
`ReD hat, Inc.
`100 east Davie Street
`raleigh, NC 27601
`Attorneys for Amici Curiae International
`Business Machines Corp. and Red Hat, Inc.
`
`293547
`
`

`

`TABLE OF CONTENTS
`
`Page
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ................................ ii
`INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ........................ 1
`SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT .................. 11
`ARGUMENT ..................................................... 13
`I.
`THE DECISION BELOW IS CONTRARY
`TO LONGSTANDING INDUSTRY
`PRACTICE AND HARMFUL TO
`INNOVATION. ....................................... 13
`II. 17 U.S.C. § 102(b) EXCLUDES
`SOFTWARE INTERFACES FROM
`COPYRIGHT PROTECTION. ............... 18
`III. THE DECISION BELOW FAILED TO
`APPLY THIS COURT’S PRECEDENT
`EXCLUDING CATEGORIES OF
`SUBJECT MATTER FROM
`COPYRIGHT PROTECTION, AS
`CODIFIED IN 17 U.S.C. § 102(b). ......... 25
`CONCLUSION .................................................. 29
`APPENDIX A — KEY FOR MAPS OF
`THE CITY OF NEW YORK BY
`WILLIAM PERRIS, CIVIL
`ENGINEER AND SURVEYOR,
`THIRD EDITION 1857 ..................................... 1a
`
`APPENDIX B — MAPS OF THE CITY
`OF NEW YORK BY WILLIAM PERRIS,
`CIVIL ENGINEER AND SURVEYOR,
`THIRD EDITION 1857 ..................................... 2a
`
`i
`
`

`

`
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`
`Page(s)
`
`Cases
`
`Aldrich v. Remington Rand, Inc.,
`52 F. Supp. 732 (N.D. Tex. 1942) ........................ 26
`Baker v. Selden,
`101 U.S. 99 (1880) .............................. 25, 26, 27, 28
`Banks v. Manchester,
`128 U.S. 244 (1888) .............................................. 25
`Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.,
`489 U.S. 141 (1989) .............................................. 28
`Brief English Sys., Inc. v. Owen,
`48 F.2d 555 (2d Cir. 1931) ................................... 26
`Brown Instrument Co. v. Warner,
`161 F.2d 910 (D.C. Cir. 1947) .............................. 23
`
`Cal. Comput. Prods., Inc. v. Int’l Bus. Machs.
`Corp.,
`613 F.2d 727 (9th Cir. 1979) ................................ 14
`
`Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film
`Corp.,
`539 U.S. 23 (2003) .......................................... 27, 28
`Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp.,
`406 U.S. 518 (1972) ................................................ 2
`Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co.,
`499 U.S. 340 (1991) ........................................ 18, 29
`
`ii
`
`

`

`
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`Cont’d
`
`Page(s)
`
`Cases
`
`Griggs v. Perrin,
`49 F. 15 (C.C.N.D.N.Y. 1892) .............................. 26
`Lotus Dev. Corp. v. Borland Int’l, Inc.,
`49 F.3d 807 (1st Cir. 1995) (Boudin, J.,
`concurring), aff’d by an equally divided court,
`516 U.S. 233 (1996) .............................................. 18
`Mazer v. Stein,
`347 U.S. 201 (1954) .............................................. 29
`Neder v. United States,
`527 US. 1 (1999) ................................................... 26
`Oracle Am., Inc. v. Google, Inc.,
`750 F.3d 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2014) .......... 12, 16, 22, 29
`Parker v. Flook,
`437 U.S. 584 (1978) ................................................ 2
`Perris v. Hexamer,
`99 U.S. 674 (1879) ........................................ passim
`Quanta Comput., Inc. v. LG Elecs., Inc.,
`553 U.S. 617 (2008) .............................................. 28
`Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.,
`376 U.S. 225 (1964) .............................................. 28
`Sekhar v. United States,
`570 U.S. 729 (2013) .............................................. 26
`
`iii
`
`

`

`
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`Cont’d
`
`Page(s)
`
`Cases
`
`Taylor Instrument Cos. v. Fawley-Brost Co.,
`139 F.2d 98 (7th Cir. 1943) .................................. 23
`United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co.,
`317 U.S. 228 (1942) .............................................. 24
`
`Statutes and Rules
`17 U.S.C. § 102(a) ...................................................... 30
`17 U.S.C. § 102(b) .............................................. passim
`17 U.S.C. § 107 .......................................................... 24
`17 U.S.C. § 107(4) ...................................................... 24
`17 U.S.C. § 109(b) ...................................................... 28
`35 U.S.C. § 100 (1976) ............................................... 27
`Act of Mar. 4, 1909, ch. 320, 35 Stat. 1075 ............... 25
`Pub. L. No. 94-553, 90 Stat. 2541 ............................. 16
`
`
`
`
`
`iv
`
`

`

`
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`Cont’d
`
`Page(s)
`
`Secondary Sources
`
`Al Gillen & Mary Johnston Turner, IDC, White
`Paper: Enterprise-Grade Open Source: An
`Imperative for Modern IT (2016),
`https://red.ht/2tQuzAR ........................................ 17
`Andy Patrizio, What is API Management?,
`Datamation (June 4, 2019),
`https://www.datamation.com/applications/wh
`at-is-api-management.html ......................... 15, 16
`Antonin Scalia & Bryan A. Garner,
`Reading Law: The Interpretation of Legal
`Texts (2012) .......................................................... 26
`API Specs, IBM Cloud,
`https://cloud.ibm.com/docs/infrastructure/cis?t
`opic=cis-api-specs (last updated Mar. 14,
`2019) ....................................................................... 6
`Bill Musgrave, A Sequel for Data Bases,
`Datamation, March 1981 ....................................... 6
`Brief Amicus Curiae of Am. Comm. for
`Interoperable Sys., Apple Computer, Inc. v.
`Microsoft Corp., 35 F.3d 1435 (9th Cir. 1994)
`(No. 93-16867), https://www.ccianet.org/wp-
`content/uploads/2014/10/Apple-Computer-
`Inc.-v.-Microsoft-Corporation-and-Hewlett-
`Packard-Company.pdf ......................................... 19
`
`v
`
`

`

`
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`Cont’d
`
`Page(s)
`
`Secondary Sources
`
`Computer History Museum, Oral History of
`Donald Chamberlin (2009),
`https://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/
`text/Oral_History/Chamberlin_Don/10270211
`1.05.01.acc.pdf ....................................................... 6
`D.D. Chamberlin et al., SEQUEL 2: A Unified
`Approach to Data Definition, Manipulation,
`and Control, 20 IBM J. Res. & Dev. 560
`(1976) ...................................................................... 5
`Damon C. Andrews & John M. Newman,
`Personal Jurisdiction and Choice of Law in
`the Cloud, 73 Md. L. Rev. 313 (2013) .................. 11
`
`Database SQL Language Reference: History of
`SQL, ORACLE® Help Center,
`https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.1
`12/e41084/intro001.htm#SQLRF50932 ................ 5
`Ecosystem Catalog, Red Hat,
`https://catalog.redhat.com ................................... 8
`
`FORTRAN: The Pioneering Programming
`Language, IBM,
`https://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/ibm100/us/e
`n/icons/fortran/ .................................................... 13
`Frank Della Rosa et al., IDC, IDC FutureScape:
`Worldwide Cloud 2020 Predictions (2019) ........... 5
`
`vi
`
`

`

`
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`Cont’d
`
`Page(s)
`
`Secondary Sources
`
`Greg Satell, How Red Hat Helped Make Open
`Source a Global Phenomenon, Inc. (Jan. 6,
`2019), https://www.inc.com/greg-satell/how-
`red-hat-scaled-from-an-unlikely-startup-to-a-
`major-global-enterprise.html ................................ 8
`IBM Corp., Dictionary of IBM & Computing
`Terminology,
`https://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/documents/
`pdf/glossary.pdf .................................. 2, 14, 17, 18
`
`IBM Multicloud Manager: 2019 Edison Award
`Gold Winner, Edison Awards,
`https://edisonawards.com/ibm-mcm.php .............. 4
`IBM’s 100 Icons of Progress, IBM,
`https://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/ibm100/us/e
`n/icons .................................................................... 3
`Inco, Inc., Oracle vs. IDM: Comparative Analysis
`(1981),
`https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a10852
`6.pdf ..................................................................... 17
`Integrate IBM Watson APIs in Your Apps, IBM
`Watson Studio,
`https://dataplatform.cloud.ibm.com/docs/conte
`nt/wsj/getting-started/wdp-apis.html (last
`updated Jan. 7, 2020) .......................................... 6
`
`vii
`
`

`

`
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`Cont’d
`
`Page(s)
`
`Secondary Sources
`
`James Gosling et al., The JavaTM Language
`Specification (3d ed. 2005)
`https://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se6/jls3
`.pdf ....................................................................... 19
`Joab Jackson, OASIS: MQTT to Be the Protocol
`for the Internet of Things, PCWorld (Apr. 26,
`2013, 11:50 AM),
`https://www.pcworld.com/article/2036500/oasi
`s-mqtt-to-be-the-protocol-for-the-internet-of-
`things.html . ......................................................... 11
`Joe Weinman, Cloudonomics: The Business
`Value of Cloud Computing (2012) ....................... 11
`John Markoff, Computer Wins on ‘Jeopardy!’:
`Trivial, It’s Not, N.Y. Times (Feb. 16, 2011),
`https://www.nytimes.com/2011/02/17/sci-
`ence/17jeopardy-watson.html ............................... 4
`Kevin Werbach, The Network Utility, 60 Duke
`L.J. 1761 (2011) .................................................... 11
`Linux: The Era of Open Innovation, IBM,
`https://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/ibm100/us/e
`n/icons/linux/ ........................................................ 16
`
`viii
`
`

`

`
`
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`Cont’d
`
`Page(s)
`
`Secondary Sources
`
`Maureen Fleming, IDC, Worldwide Integration
`and API Management Software Market
`Shares, 2018: Portable Cloud Integration Is a
`Fastest-Growing Segment (2019),
`http://idcdocserv.com/US44786119e_IBM .......... 15
`
`New Cloud Native Computing Foundation to
`Drive Alignment Among Container
`Technologies, Cloud Native Computing
`Foundation (June 21, 2015),
`https://www.cncf.io/announcement/2015/06/21
`/new-cloud-native-computing-foundation-to-
`drive-alignment-among-container-
`technologies/ ........................................................ 11
`OpenJDK FAQ, OpenJDK (Dec. 18, 2010),
`https://openjdk.java.net/faq/ ................................. 9
`
`Our Company: Building a Better Foundation for
`the Future of IT, Red Hat,
`https://www.redhat.com/en/about/company ........ 7
`Pamela Samuelson, Why Copyright Law
`Excludes Systems and Processes From the
`Scope of Its Protection, 85 Tex. L. Rev. 1921
`(2007) .................................................................... 27
`
`
`
`
`
`ix
`
`

`

`
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`Cont’d
`
`Page(s)
`
`Secondary Sources
`
`Paul Scheuer, Dell EMC and IBM Renew
`Licensing Agreements Through 2021.
`Cooperative Support Agreement Continues in
`Perpetuity, Dell EMC: Everything Mainframe
`at EMC (Oct. 30, 2018, 1:57:46 PM),
`https://community.emc.com/community/conne
`ct/everything-mainframe/blog/2018/10/30/dell-
`emc-and-ibm-renew-licensing-agreements-
`through-2021-cooperative-support-agreement-
`continues-in-perpetuity ........................................ 6
`The PC: Personal Computing Comes of Age, IBM,
`https://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/ibm100/us/e
`n/icons/personalcomputer/ ................................... 6
`Red Hat Enterprise Linux, Red Hat,
`https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/linux
`-platforms/enterprise-linux ................................. 8
`Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform,
`Red Hat,
`https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/jboss-
`middleware/application-platform ......................... 9
`Red Hat Satellite, Red Hat,
`https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/mana
`gement/satellite .................................................. 10
`Red Hat Virtualization, Red Hat,
`https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/virtu
`alization/enterprise-virtualization .................... 10
`x
`
`

`

`
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`Cont’d
`
`Page(s)
`
`Secondary Sources
`
`Relational Database, IBM,
`https://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/ibm100/us/e
`n/icons/reldb/ ...................................................... 14
`Sara Castellanos, IBM’s Quantum-Computing
`Service Tops 100 Customers, Wall St. J. (Jan.
`8, 2020), https://www.wsj.com/articles/ibms-
`quantum-computing-service-tops-100-custom-
`ers-11578481200 .................................................... 5
`Shigeru Takahashi, The Rise and Fall of Plug-
`Compatible Mainframes, IEEE Annals Hist.
`Computing, Jan.-March 2005 .............................. 14
`Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols, RHEL 8 Released,
`ZDNet (May 7, 2019, 6:00 PM),
`https://zd.net/37WLssj .......................................... 9
`Sun Microsystems, Inc., Java 2 Standard
`Edition, Version 5.0 (2004) .................................. 12
`
`System 360: From Computers to Computer
`Systems, IBM
`https://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/ibm100/us/e
`n/icons/system360/ ............................................. 14
`U.S. Copyright Office, Software-Enabled
`Consumer Products (2016),
`https://www.copyright.gov/policy/software/soft
`ware-full-report.pdf ............................................... 2
`
`xi
`
`

`

`
`
`TABLE OF AUTHORITIES
`Cont’d
`
`Page(s)
`
`Secondary Sources
`
`Understanding Middleware, Red Hat,
`https://www.redhat.com/en/topics/middleware ..... 9
`Webster’s Third New Int’l Dictionary (1961) ............ 26
`William Perris, Maps of the City of New York
`(1857), https://digitalcollec-
`tions.nypl.org/items/06fd4630-c603-012f-17f8-
`58d385a7bc34 ...................................................... 20
`Zvi S. Rosen, How Perris v. Hexamer Was Lost in
`the Shadow of Baker v. Selden, 68 Syracuse
`L. Rev. 231 (2018) ................................................ 22
`
`
`
`xii
`
`

`

`
`
`INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE
`Computer interfaces are not copyrightable. That
`simple, yet powerful principle has been a cornerstone
`of technological and economic growth for over sixty
`years.1 When published (as has been common indus-
`try practice for over three decades) or lawfully reverse
`engineered,2 they have spurred innovation through
`competition, increased productivity and economic effi-
`ciency, and connected the world in a way that has ben-
`efited commercial enterprises and consumers alike.
`Not once, until this case, has a Court of Appeals
`held that software interfaces are protected by copy-
`right separate and apart from the code embodying the
`implementation of those interfaces. This is not be-
`cause this principle is fringe; it is because it has al-
`ways been accepted—based on legal precedent dating
`back 140 years. Congress has been aware of not just
`the existence, but the fundamental utility of this tru-
`ism within the computing industry since the 1950s
`and not once has it undertaken any effort to modify
`the settled body of law and industry expectations, lest
`it derail the vast and innovative economy that has
`
`1 No counsel for a party authored this brief in whole or in part,
`and no such counsel or party made a monetary contribution in-
`tended to fund the preparation or submission of this brief. No
`person other than the amici curiae or their counsel made a mon-
`etary contribution to its preparation or submission. The parties
`have consented to the filing of this brief.
`2 When kept as a trade secret, interfaces have been immensely
`valuable to their creators, both in maintaining exclusive closed
`systems and in licensing to others to develop interoperable prod-
`ucts—often leading to vigorous debates in legislatures, courts,
`and the public throughout the modern computing era.
`
`1
`
`

`

`
`come to rely upon them.3 Absent a clear and certain
`signal from Congress to modify this crucial balance
`and the positive effect it has had on every application
`from aviation to medicine, this Court should not act to
`disrupt settled law.4
`International Business Machines Corp. (“IBM”)
`and Red Hat, Inc. (“Red Hat”) are leading developers
`of software and information technology systems that,
`by means of interfaces,5 provide for interoperation of
`diverse programs and programmable devices. The de-
`cision below threatens to undermine and adversely
`impact a core aspect of IBM’s and Red Hat’s business,
`as well as that of their clients.
`
`3 Cf. U.S. Copyright Office, Software-Enabled Consumer Prods.
`52 (2016), https://www.copyright.gov/policy/software/software-
`full-report.pdf (“The Copyright Office recognizes the importance
`of preserving the ability to develop products and services that
`can interoperate with software-enabled consumer products, and
`the goal of preserving competition in the marketplace.”).
`4 Cf. Parker v. Flook, 437 U.S. 584, 596 (1978) (“We would require
`a clear and certain signal from Congress before approving the
`position of a litigant who, as respondent here, argues that the
`beachhead of privilege is wider, and the area of public use nar-
`rower, than courts had previously thought.”) (quoting Deepsouth
`Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp., 406 U.S. 518, 531 (1972)).
`5 See IBM Corp., Dictionary of IBM & Computing Terminology
`https://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/documents/pdf/glos-
`44,
`sary.pdf (last visited Jan. 13, 2020) (the “IBM Glossary”) (“inter-
`face 1. n. A shared boundary between two functional units, de-
`fined by functional characteristics, signal characteristics, or
`other characteristics, as appropriate. The concept includes the
`specification of the connection of two devices having different
`functions. 2. n. Hardware, software, or both, that links systems,
`programs, or devices.”). The IBM Glossary defines a number of
`technical terms used in briefs in this case.
`
`2
`
`

`

`
`
`Given that IBM and Red Hat have collectively de-
`veloped tens of thousands of software programs com-
`prising hundreds of millions of lines of code, combined
`with the companies’ service of clients across all indus-
`tries in over 170 countries worldwide, amici are par-
`ticularly well-positioned to address whether software
`interfaces are copyrightable.
`IBM brings a balanced view to the issue in this
`case. As its very name suggests, IBM’s business is
`truly international. IBM licenses and makes availa-
`ble software programs throughout the world, relying
`upon underlying copyrights to protect such software
`programs from unauthorized use. As one of the most
`successful licensors of software technology in the
`world, IBM relies on its ability to enforce its copy-
`rights in software in order to protect its business in-
`terests. IBM continues to invest billions of dollars an-
`nually in software technology in reliance on a mature,
`fair, and balanced U.S. copyright system.
`At the forefront of business innovation for more
`than 100 years,6 IBM has enabled countless technical
`achievements from the Apollo missions to the first
`publicly accessible quantum computers in the cloud.
`
`
`IBM,
`Progress,
`6
`of
`See
`IBM’s
`100
`Icons
`https://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/ibm100/us/en/icons (last vis-
`ited Jan. 13, 2020) (listing examples). IBM’s sustained commit-
`ment to research and innovation has resulted in six Nobel laure-
`ates, five National Medal of Science recipients, thirteen winners
`of the National Medal of Technology, six winners of the Turing
`Award, and twenty-seven consecutive years of receiving the most
`patents issued from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
`
`3
`
`

`

`
`Just since this case began, IBM has accelerated inno-
`vation in every facet of computing technology. Not
`long after Respondent brought this suit over Java in-
`terface specifications developed in the 1990s, IBM de-
`ployed an artificial intelligence (“AI”) system that
`beat the reigning all-time human champion on Jeop-
`ardy!,7 signaling the emergence of AI as a commer-
`cially viable technology that is now embedded in
`nearly every form of computing. IBM also responded
`to industry demand for workload portability and cli-
`ent choice by championing the hybrid cloud computing
`model, enabling interoperability across the ever-grow-
`ing and competitive cloud computing landscape.8 To
`this end, IBM has accelerated development of award-
`winning products9 that drive efficiency, competition,
`and innovation that enterprises can leverage in an
`ever-changing IT landscape.10
`
`
`7 John Markoff, Computer Wins on ‘Jeopardy!’: Trivial, It’s Not,
`https://www.ny-
`N.Y.
`Times
`(Feb.
`16,
`2011),
`
`times.com/2011/02/17/science/17jeopardy-watson.html.
`8 IBM’s 2019 acquisition of Red Hat, discussed infra, was the cul-
`mination of IBM’s twenty-year commitment to open source soft-
`ware development. This has included everything from multi-bil-
`lion dollar investments toward bringing Linux to enterprise
`quality to the development of open source technology that em-
`powers clients to choose how their data is processed, stored and
`secured.
`9 See, e.g., IBM Multicloud Manager: 2019 Edison Award Gold
`Winner, Edison Awards, https://edisonawards.com/ibm-mcm.php
`(last visited Jan. 13, 2020).
`10 Industry analysts predict that, “By 2021, over 90% of enter-
`prises worldwide will rely on a mix of on-premises/dedicated pri-
`vate clouds, several public clouds, and legacy platforms to meet
`
`4
`
`

`

`
`
`IBM is the leader in providing industry, academia,
`and government researchers with direct access to in-
`dustry-leading quantum computing platforms via the
`cloud.11 The public, from the most sophisticated data
`scientists to high school students just learning how to
`code, access these innovations in the same way all
`modern systems are accessed—via software inter-
`faces.
`This is not a recent development. Most, if not all,
`technologies discussed in the parties’ briefs, by the
`amici, and at issue in prior cases involving computing
`interfaces, were enabled by IBM public disclosures,
`including specifications of interfaces to mainframe
`computers (giving birth to the independent software
`developer and hardware peripheral industries), speci-
`fications of the first relational database (making the
`use of extraordinarily large volumes of data accessible
`to average businesses),12 and the IBM PC BIOS
`
`their infrastructure needs.” Frank Della Rosa et al., IDC, IDC
`FutureScape: Worldwide Cloud 2020 Predictions 2 (2019).
`11 Sara Castellanos, IBM’s Quantum-Computing Service Tops
`Customers, Wall
`St.
`J.
`(Jan.
`8,
`2020),
`100
`https://www.wsj.com/articles/ibms-quantum-computing-service-
`tops-100-customers-11578481200.
`12 See D.D. Chamberlin et al., SEQUEL 2: A Unified Approach to
`Data Definition, Manipulation, and Control, 20 IBM J. Res. &
`Dev. 560 (1976). “In 1979, Relational Software, Inc. (now Oracle)
`introduced the first commercially available implementation of
`SQL. Today, SQL is accepted as the standard RDBMS lan-
`guage.” Database SQL Language Reference: History of SQL, OR-
`Help
`Center,
`https://docs.ora-
`ACLE®
`cle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e41084/in-
`tro001.htm#SQLRF50932. Considering it to be in the public do-
`main, and because it was “powerful, uniform, and relatively easy
`
`5
`
`

`

`
`source code (launching the “IBM compatible” revolu-
`tion).13 Enabling interoperability with third-party
`computing and network devices, publishing interface
`specifications to guide this necessary integration ef-
`fort, and the technical achievements enabled by these
`efforts are not new to IBM or to the advancement of
`computing—they are critical to it.
`While an ever-increasing number of IBM software
`interfaces, including for AI14 and cloud15 applications,
`are published, IBM maintains others as proprietary
`assets and protects them as trade secrets, sometimes
`making them available for licensing,16 but then only
`
`
`to grasp, [Oracle founder] Ellison and company chose to imple-
`ment versions for a number of machines, from minis up,” relying
`on the presumption that “IBM will educate people to SQL.” Bill
`Musgrave, A Sequel for Data Bases, Datamation, March 1981, at
`69. Oracle’s goal was to create an implementation that was con-
`sistent with IBM’s “so that there would be a common interface
`with compatible error codes and everything else.” Computer His-
`tory Museum, Oral History of Donald Chamberlin 26 (2009),
`https://archive.computerhistory.org/resources/text/Oral_His-
`tory/Chamberlin_Don/102702111.05.01.acc.pdf.
`13 See The PC: Personal Computing Comes of Age, IBM,
`https://www.ibm.com/ibm/history/ibm100/us/en/icons/personal-
`computer/ (last visited Jan. 13, 2020).
`14 See Integrate IBM Watson APIs in Your Apps, IBM Watson
`Studio, https://dataplatform.cloud.ibm.com/docs/content/wsj/get-
`ting-started/wdp-apis.html (last updated Jan. 7, 2020).
`15 See API Specs, IBM Cloud, https://cloud.ibm.com/docs/infra-
`structure/cis?topic=cis-api-specs (last updated Mar. 14, 2019).
`16 See, e.g., Paul Scheuer, Dell EMC and IBM Renew Licensing
`Agreements Through 2021. Cooperative Support Agreement Con-
`tinues in Perpetuity, Dell EMC: Everything Mainframe at EMC
`
`6
`
`

`

`
`on a confidential basis. Once its interfaces are pub-
`lished, however, IBM has never treated them, and
`does not now treat them, as copyrightable subject
`matter. This fundamental principle on which IBM
`has based its business has not changed in view of any
`action by Congress, or this Court, in the last sixty
`years.
`Consistent with IBM’s experience, businesses in
`all industries, clients and competitors alike, have
`come to rely on unrestricted access to software inter-
`faces in order to stitch together complex systems from
`multiple vendors, improve upon existing products to
`drive competition and innovation, and afford the busi-
`nesses that own the data on these systems the oppor-
`tunity to make economically efficient decisions, in-
`cluding migrating to the cloud and orchestrating
`workloads amongst vigorously competing cloud pro-
`viders.
`Red Hat is the world’s largest developer of enter-
`prise open source software solutions.17 Red Hat’s cus-
`tomers include more than ninety percent of the For-
`tune 500.18 Using a community-powered approach to
`
`
`(Oct. 30, 2018, 1:57:46 PM), https://community.emc.com/commu-
`nity/connect/everything-mainframe/blog/2018/10/30/dell-emc-
`and-ibm-renew-licensing-agreements-through-2021-coopera-
`tive-support-agreement-continues-in-perpetuity.
`17 See Our Company: Building a Better Foundation for the Future
`of IT, Red Hat, https://www.redhat.com/en/about/company (last
`visited Jan. 13, 2020).
`18 Id.
`
`7
`
`

`

`
`software development,19 Red Hat has developed relia-
`ble, high-performing, enterprise-quality cloud, mid-
`dleware, storage, and virtualization technologies in-
`cluding Red Hat Enterprise Linux (“RHEL”),20 an
`open source operating system that Red Hat has
`adapted and certified to interoperate with thousands
`of diverse hardware, software, and cloud products and
`services. 21
`Red Hat, as a continuous innovator in the open
`source software ecosystem, with significant experi-
`ence and product offerings in numerous and diverse
`software technologies, has a stake in the consistent
`and correct determination of the scope of copyright
`protection that applies to interfaces of computer pro-
`grams, including the Java platform interface at stake
`in this case. Open source software development relies
`on the availability of and unencumbered access to
`
`
`19 “What few people realized back in the 90s was that open source
`software doesn’t mean the end of proprietary technologies. Ra-
`ther, it provides a stable environment upon which proprietary
`technologies can be built. That’s the opportunity that Red Hat
`seized more than two decades ago, with a new era of computing
`dawning, that is what lays before it today.” Greg Satell, How
`Red Hat Helped Make Open Source a Global Phenomenon, Inc.
`(Jan. 6, 2019), https://www.inc.com/greg-satell/how-red-hat-
`scaled-from-an-unlikely-startup-to-a-major-global-enter-
`prise.html.
`Red Hat,
`Linux,
`20
`Enterprise
`See Red Hat
`https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/linux-platforms/enter-
`prise-linux (last visited Jan. 13, 2020).
`21 See Ecosystem Catalog, Red Hat, https://catalog.redhat.com
`(last visited Jan. 13, 2020).
`
`8
`
`

`

`
`software interfaces, including products that are com-
`patible with or interoperate with other computer
`products, platforms, and services.
` Red Hat has a long and extensive history of devel-
`oping software written in Java as well as implemen-
`tations of the Java programming language. Red Hat’s
`significant involvement with Java development over
`the last twenty years has included extensive contribu-
`tions to OpenJDK,22 an open source implementation
`of the Java platform sponsored by Respondent, and
`the development of JBoss,23 a suite of Java-based mid-
`dleware solutions for running enterprise applications.
`Red Hat continues to contribute to various open
`source Java community software development pro-
`jects as well as packaging and supporting many Java
`technologies within Red Hat’s flagship RHEL prod-
`uct,24 the world’s leading enterprise Linux operating
`system platform, as well as other products, including
`
`
`22 See OpenJDK FAQ, OpenJDK (Dec. 18, 2010), https://open-
`jdk.java.net/faq/.
`Hat,
`Red
`23
`Understanding Middleware,
`See
`https://www.redhat.com/en/topics/middleware (last visited Jan.
`13, 2020); Red Hat JBoss Enterprise Application Platform, Red
`https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/jboss-middle-
`Hat,
`ware/application-platform (last visited Jan. 13, 2020).
`24 “RHEL is far more than just a Linux distribution. It’s the foun-
`dation for everything and all things business IT in 2019. AI, In-
`ternet of Things (IoT), containers, DevOps -- you name it, it runs
`on Linux. And, quite often that Linux is Red Hat’s Linux.” Ste-
`ven J. Vaughan-Nichols, RHEL 8 Released, ZDNet (May 7, 2019,
`6:00 PM), https://zd.net/37WLssj.
`
`9
`
`

`

`
`Red Hat Virtualization,25 an enterprise-grade server
`and desktop virtualization platform built on RHEL,
`and Red Hat Satellite,26 a management solution for
`configuring systems across physical, virtual, and
`cloud environments.
`Red Hat, acquired by IBM last year, continues to
`operate as a distinct unit, preserving the independ-
`ence and neutrality of Red Hat’s open source develop-
`ment heritage and commitment, current product port-
`folio and go-to-market strategy, and unique develop-
`ment culture.
`As leading developers of software, IBM and Red
`Hat are vitally interested in the legal status of soft-
`ware interfaces, whose use is fundamental27 to inno-
`vation by establishing compatibility between hard-
`ware and software components in computer systems
`that facilitate innovation and drive economic growth.
`
`
`Hat,
`Red
`25
`Virtualization,
`See
`Red
`Hat
`https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/virtualization/enter-
`prise-virtualization (last visited Jan. 13, 2020).
`Hat,
`Red
`26
`Satellite,
`See
`Red
`Hat
`https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/management/satellite
`(last visited Jan. 13, 2020).
`27 Industry analysts predict that, “By 2022, 90% of new digital
`services will be built as composite applications using public and
`internal API-delivered services; half of those will leverage artifi-
`cial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML).” Della Rosa et
`al., supra note 10, at 2.
`
`10
`
`

`

`
`
`SUMMARY OF THE ARGUMENT
`Software interfaces are crucial to every critical
`technology that interacts with the cloud28 to expand
`and enrich our experience with connected devices,29
`from self-driving cars to personal fitness apps. By al-
`lowing access to content from anywhere in the world
`with an Internet connection, these technologies pro-
`vide users with an unprecedented degree of mobility;
`their benefits—including scalability, workload migra-
`tion, resiliency, and cost savings—are plentiful for
`both consumers and businesses alike.30 In order to ad-
`dress myriad challenges, from cybersecurity threats
`to anticompetitive vendor lock-in, technology that per-
`mits data owners to choose when and where to run

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket