throbber
Case 2:21-cv-02435-JTF-atc Document 1 Filed 06/28/21 Page 1 of 5 PageID 1
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
`WESTERN DIVISION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`TROY HOPKINS d/b/a
`
`
`TROY HOPKINS FARMS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`GLENN HOPKINS d/b/a
`
`HOPKINS & HOPKINS FARMS
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`NUTRIEN AG SOLUTIONS, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOHN DOE CORP., 1 – 10,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`and
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JOHN DOE, 1 – 10,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`NOTICE OF REMOVAL
`
`Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), Defendant Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. (“Nutrien”) hereby
`
`petitions the Court for removal of the action described below from the State Circuit Court for the
`
`Twenty-Fifth Judicial District of Tennessee to the United States District Court for the Western
`
`District of Tennessee, Western Division, and, in support thereof, state as follows:
`
`STATEMENT OF GROUNDS FOR REMOVAL
`
`1.
`
`On July 31, 2019, Plaintiffs Troy Hopkins d/b/a Troy Hopkins Farms and Glenn
`
`Hopkins d/b/a Hopkins & Hopkins Farms (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) commenced this action by
`
`filing a Complaint for Damages (“Complaint”) against Nutrien and a number of “John Doe”
`
`defendants in the State Circuit Court for the Twenty-Fifth Judicial District of Tennessee (the “State
`
`603806488.1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-02435-JTF-atc Document 1 Filed 06/28/21 Page 2 of 5 PageID 2
`
`
`Court Action”), Case No. 7680. A true and correct copy of the Complaint and all process,
`
`pleadings, motions, and orders received by Nutrien or otherwise listed on the docket of the State
`
`Court Action are attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`2.
`
`Based on the Complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a), Nutrien hereby removes
`
`the State Court Action to this Court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. The parties in this action
`
`are citizens of different states.
`
`3.
`
`Plaintiffs are individuals and citizens of the State of Tennessee. (Exh. A, p. 2, ¶¶ 1-
`
`2 (listing both Plaintiffs as “an adult resident of Tipton County,” Tennessee.) While Plaintiffs
`
`listed “d/b/a” names of “Troy Hopkins Farms” and “Hopkins and Hopkins” in the Complaint, there
`
`is no indications from the allegations of the Complaint that these are separate business entities.
`
`4.
`
`Nutrien is a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, with its
`
`principal place of business in the State of Colorado. (Exh. A, p. 2, ¶ 3.)
`
`5.
`
`The Complaint also purports to name as defendants “John Doe Corp., 1-10” as
`
`business entities and “John Doe, 1-10” as individuals. (Exh. A. pp. 1 & 2-3, ¶¶ 6-7.)
`
`6.
`
`The amount in controversy as pled on the face of the Complaint satisfies the
`
`requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) for subject matter jurisdiction based on diversity of the parties
`
`as Plaintiffs are unambiguously seeking to recover present total money damages from Nutrien
`
`greater than $75,000. (See Exh. A, p. 7, ¶ 3 (seeking “compensatory damages in an amount no less
`
`than ONE MILLION DOLLARS ($1,000,000.000)”) (capitalization in original).)
`
`7.
`
`This removal is timely under 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b) because, notwithstanding that the
`
`Complaint was filed in July 2019, Plaintiffs first served copies of the Summons and Complaint on
`
`Nutrien through service upon its registered agent in the State of Tennessee on June 16, 2021 and
`
`this Notice of Removal is filed with thirty days thereafter. See Exhibit A.
`
`603806488.1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-02435-JTF-atc Document 1 Filed 06/28/21 Page 3 of 5 PageID 3
`
`
`
`8.
`
`Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a) because it is the federal
`
`district court that embraces the place where the original State Court Action was filed and is
`
`pending.
`
`9.
`
`While the Complaint purports to name multiple defendants besides Nutrien, the
`
`additional defendants are identified only as “John Doe” or “John Doe Corporation.” (See Exh. A,
`
`pp. 2-3, ¶¶ 6-7.) The citizenship of a “John Doe” defendant is disregarded for purposes of
`
`determining whether a civil action is removable on the basis of diversity jurisdiction under Section
`
`1332(a). See 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(1); see also Riddle v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc., 802 F. Supp.
`
`2d 900, 904 (M.D. Tenn. 2011) (“The citizenship of John Doe, a fictitious defendant, cannot be
`
`considered for the purpose of determining whether to remand a case founded upon diversity
`
`jurisdiction.”).
`
`10.
`
`Concurrently with this Notice of Removal, Nutrien will file a copy of this Notice
`
`with the State Circuit Court for the Twenty-Fifth Judicial District of Tennessee. In accordance
`
`with 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d), Nutrien will give written notice to Plaintiffs by contemporaneously
`
`serving this Notice of Removal on Plaintiffs.
`
`11.
`
`For the foregoing reasons, Nutrien respectfully removes this civil action to the
`
`Western Division of the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee.
`
`WHEREFORE, Defendant Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc. respectfully requests that the action
`
`now pending in the State Circuit Court for the Twenty-Fifth Judicial District of Tennessee be
`
`removed to the Western Division of the United States District Court for the Western District of
`
`Tennessee.
`
`
`
`
`
`603806488.1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-02435-JTF-atc Document 1 Filed 06/28/21 Page 4 of 5 PageID 4
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`LEWIS THOMASON, P.C.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`By:s/ Robert F. Chapski
`Robert F. Chapski, BPR No. 022043
`424 Church Street, Suite 2500
`Post Office Box 198615
`Nashville, Tennessee 37219
`(615) 259-1366 (telephone)
`(615) 259-1389 (facsimile)
`rchapski@lewisthomason.com
`
`Patrick S. Quinn, BPR No. 35293
`40 S. Main Street, Suite 2900
`Memphis, TN 38103
`(901) 525-8721 (telephone)
`(901) 525-6722 (facsimile)
`pquinn@lewisthomason.com
`
`and
`
`BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER LLP
`Paul J. Lopach, Colo. Atty. Reg. No. 34441
`1700 North Lincoln Street, Suite 4100
`Denver, Colorado 80203
`(303) 861-7000 (telephone)
`(303) 866-0200 (facsimile)
`paul.lopach@bclplaw.com
`Pro Hac Vice Application to be Filed
`
`Attorneys for Defendant Nutrien Ag Solutions, Inc.
`
`
`Dated: June 28, 2021
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`603806488.1
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-02435-JTF-atc Document 1 Filed 06/28/21 Page 5 of 5 PageID 5
`
`CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
`
`
`The undersigned hereby certifies that a true and exact copy of the foregoing Notice of
`
`Removal has been served upon the counsel for the parties in interest herein by placing same in a
`postage prepaid envelope in first class mail to:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`David A. Stowers
`Bryan R. Huffman
`Huffman & Mason, PLLC
`131 West Liberty Avenue
`P.O. Box 944
`Covington, TN 38019
`(901) 726-3854 (telephone)
`(901) 726-3539 (facsimile)
`
`
`Dated the 28th day of June, 2021.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`s/ Robert F. Chapski
`Robert F. Chapski
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`603806488.1
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket