Case 2:19-cv-00066-JRG Document 483 Filed 08/11/20 Page 1 of 9 PageID #: 39219
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`§§§§§ §§§§
`
`§§§§
`
`OPTIS WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`PANOPTIS PATENT MANAGEMENT,
`LLC, UNWIRED PLANET, LLC,
`UNWIRED PLANET INTERNATIONAL
`LIMITED,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
` CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-00066-JRG
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`In answering the following questions and completing this Verdict Form, you
`
`are to follow all the instructions I have given you in the Court s Final Jury
`
`Instructions. Your answers to each question must be unanimous. Some of the
`
`questions contain legal terms that are defined and explained in detail in the Final
`
`Jury Instructions. You should refer to and consider the Final Jury Instructions as you
`
`answer the questions in this Verdict Form.
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`MARSHALL DIVISION
`
`§§§§§ §§§§
`
`§§§§
`
`OPTIS WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC,
`PANOPTIS PATENT MANAGEMENT,
`LLC, UNWIRED PLANET, LLC,
`UNWIRED PLANET INTERNATIONAL
`LIMITED,
`
`v.
`
`APPLE INC.,
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`Defendant.
`
` CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:19-CV-00066-JRG
`
`VERDICT FORM
`
`In answering the following questions and completing this Verdict Form, you
`
`are to follow all the instructions I have given you in the Court s Final Jury
`
`Instructions. Your answers to each question must be unanimous. Some of the
`
`questions contain legal terms that are defined and explained in detail in the Final
`
`Jury Instructions. You should refer to and consider the Final Jury Instructions as you
`
`answer the questions in this Verdict Form.
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00066-JRG Document 483 Filed 08/11/20 Page 2 of 9 PageID #: 39220
`
`As used herein, the following terms have the following meanings:
`
`• Optis refers to collectively Optis Wireless Technology, LLC; Optis Cellular
`
`Technology, LLC; Unwired Planet, LLC; PanOptis Patent Management,
`
`LLC; and Unwired Planet International Limited
`
`• Apple refers to Apple Inc.
`
`• The “ 332 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 8,019,332
`
`• The “’284 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 8,385,284
`
`The “’557 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 8,411,557
`
`• The “’774 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 9,001,774
`
`• The “’833 Patent refers to U.S. Patent No. 8,102,833.
`
`• The “Asserted Claims refers collectively to Claims 6 and 7 of the
`
`’332 Patent; Claims 1, 14, and 27 of the ’284 Patent; Claims 1 and 10 of the
`
`’557 Patent; Claim 6 of the ’774 Patent; and Claim 8 of the ’833 Patent.
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00066-JRG Document 483 Filed 08/11/20 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 39221
`Case 2:19-cv-00066-JRG Document 483 Filed 08/11/20 Page 3 of 9 PageID #: 39221
`
`IT IS VERY IMPORANT THAT YOU FOLLOW THE
`IT IS VERY IMPORANT THAT YOU FOLLOW THE
`INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED IN THIS VERDICT FORM.
`INSTRUCTIONS PROVIDED IN THIS VERDICT FORM.
`
`READ THEM CAREFULLY AND
`READ THEM CAREFULLY AND
`ENSURE YOUR VERDICT COMPLIES WITH THEM.
`ENSURE YOUR VERDICT COMPLIES WITH THEM.
`
`3
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00066-JRG Document 483 Filed 08/11/20 Page 4 of 9 PageID #: 39222
`
`QUESTION NO. 1:
`
`Did Optis prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Apple infringed ANY of
`
`the Asserted Claims?
`
`Yes:
`
`,</
`i -*«, g
`i € -
`
`No:
`
`If you answer this question NO do NOT answer any other questions, leave the
`
`remaining questions unanswered and go to the final page of the Jury Verdict form.
`
`4
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00066-JRG Document 483 Filed 08/11/20 Page 5 of 9 PageID #: 39223
`
`QUESTION NO. 2;
`
`Did Apple prove by clear and convincing evidence that any of the following Asserted
`
`Claims are invalid?
`
`Answer Yes or “No” for each Asserted Claim listed below:
`
`Claim 6 of the 332 Patent , *
`
`Claim 7 of the 332 Patent if ,
`
`Claim 1 of the ’284 Patent
`
`Claim 14 of the ’284 Patent
`
`Claim 27 of the ’284 Patent A
`
`Claim 1 of the ’557 Patent 2 * -
`
`Claim 10 of the ’557 Patent
`
`Claim 6 of the ’774 Patent ftf@
`
`Claim 8 of the ’833 Patent /|/o
`
`5
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00066-JRG Document 483 Filed 08/11/20 Page 6 of 9 PageID #: 39224
`
`If you answered NO to Question No. 1 OR YES to ALL the Asserted Claims
`listed in Question No. 2, then DO NOT answer Question No. 3.
`
`Answer Question No. 3 ONLY as to any Asserted Claim that you have found
`BOTH to be infringed and not invalid.
`
`QUESTION NO. 3
`
`Did Optis prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Apple willfully infringed
`
`ANY of the Asserted Claims that you found were infringed?
`
`Yes: r\:.
`
`No:
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00066-JRG Document 483 Filed 08/11/20 Page 7 of 9 PageID #: 39225
`
`If you answered NO to Question No. 1 OR YES to ALL the Asserted Claims
`listed in Question No. 2. then DO NOT answer Question No. 4a or 4b.
`
`Answer Question No. 4a and 4b ONLY as to any Asserted Claim that you
`have found BOTH to be infringed nd not invalid.
`
`Q ESTION NO. 4 :
`
`What sum of money, if any, paid now in cas , has Optis proven by a preponderance
`
`of the evidence would compensate Optis for its damages resulting from infringement
`
`through the date of trial?
`
`Answer in United States Dollars and Cents, if any:
`
`$ -
`
`7
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00066-JRG Document 483 Filed 08/11/20 Page 8 of 9 PageID #: 39226
`
`QUESTION NO. 4b:
`
`Is the total amount you found in Question No. 4a a lump-sum for past and
`
`future sales or a royalty for past sales only?
`
`C eck one of the following:
`
`Lump-sum
`
`OR
`
`Royalty for past sales
`
`8
`
`
`
`Case 2:19-cv-00066-JRG Document 483 Filed 08/11/20 Page 9 of 9 PageID #: 39227
`
`FINAL PAGE OF JURY VERDICT FORM
`
`You have now reached the end of the Verdict Form and should review it to ensure it
`
`accurately reflects your unanimous determinations. The Jury Foreperson should
`
`then sign and date the Verdict Form in the spaces below. Once this is done, notify
`
`the Court Security Officer that you have reached a verdict. The Jury Foreperson
`
`should keep the Verdict Form and bring it when the jury is brought back into the
`
`courtroom.
`
`Signed this // day of August, 2020.
`
`Jury Forep „
`
`9
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
