throbber

`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1
`
`THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`DALLAS DIVISION
`
`
`ROTHSCHILD BROADCAST
`DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`FUZE, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
` CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-cv-03365
`
`
` JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Rothschild Broadcast Distribution Systems, LLC (“Plaintiff” or “Rothschild
`
`Broadcast Distribution Systems”) files this complaint against Fuze, Inc. (“Fuze”) for infringement
`
`of U.S. Patent No. 8,856,221 (hereinafter the “`221 Patent”) and alleges as follows:
`
`PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff is a Texas limited liability company with an office at 1801 NE 123 Street, Suite
`
`314, Miami, FL 33181.
`
`2.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant is a Delaware corporation, with a place of business
`
`at 3001 Dallas Pkwy., Ste. 140, Frisco, Texas 75034. On information and belief, Defendant may
`
`be served through its agent, The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209
`
`Orange St., Wilmington, DE 19801.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`3.
`
`This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 271 et seq.
`
`Plaintiff is seeking damages, as well as attorney fees and costs.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 2 of 11 PageID 2Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 2 of 11 PageID 2
`
`Jurisdiction is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 (Federal Question) and
`
`
`
`4.
`
`1338(a) (Patents).
`
`5.
`
`On information and belief, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because
`
`Defendant has committed, and continues to commit, acts of infringement in this District, has
`
`conducted business in this District, and/or has engaged in continuous and systematic activities in
`this District.
`
`6.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant’s instrumentalities that are alleged herein to
`
`infringe were and continue to be used, imported, offered for sale, and/or sold in the District.
`
`7.
`
`Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. §1400(b) because Defendant is deemed to
`
`be a resident in this District. Alternatively, acts of infringement are occurring in this District and
`
`Defendant has a regular and established place of business in this District.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`8.
`
`On October 7, 2014, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) duly and
`
`legally issued the `221 Patent, entitled “System and Method for Storing Broadcast Content in a
`
`Cloud-Based Computing Environment” after the USPTO completed a full and fair examination.
`
`The ‘221 Patent is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`9.
`
`Rothschild Broadcast Distribution Systems is currently the owner of the `221 Patent.
`
`10.
`
`Rothschild Broadcast Distribution Systems possesses all rights of recovery under the `221
`
`Patent, including the exclusive right to recover for past, present and future infringement.
`
`11.
`
`The `221 Patent contains thirteen claims including two independent claims (claims 1 and
`
`7) and eleven dependent claims.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 3 of 11 PageID 3Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 3 of 11 PageID 3
`
`
`
`COUNT ONE
`(Infringement of United States Patent No. 8,856,221)
`
`12.
`
`Plaintiff refers to and incorporates the allegations in Paragraphs 1 - 11, the same as if set
`
`forth herein.
`
`13.
`
`This cause of action arises under the patent laws of the United States and, in particular
`
`under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, et seq.
`
`14.
`
`Defendant has knowledge of its infringement of the `221 Patent, at least as of the service
`
`of the present complaint.
`
`15.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe one or
`
`more claims, including at least Claim 7, of the ‘221 Patent by making, using, importing, selling,
`
`and/or offering for media content storage and delivery systems and services covered by one or
`
`more claims of the ‘221 Patent.
`
`16.
`
`Accordingly, Defendant has infringed, and continues to infringe, the `221 Patent in
`
`violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`17.
`
`Defendant sells, offers to sell, and/or uses media content storage and delivery systems and
`
`services, including, without limitation, the Fuze enterprise cloud PBX phone system, Fuze Portal,
`
`and any similar products (“Product”), which infringes at least Claim 7 of the ‘221 Patent.
`
`18.
`
`The Product practices a method of storing (e.g., cloud storage) media content (e.g.,
`
`voicemail, etc.) and delivering requested media content to a consumer device. Certain aspects of
`
`these elements are illustrated in the screenshots below and/or in those provided in connection with
`
`other allegations herein.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 4 of 11 PageID 4Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 4 of 11 PageID 4
`
`
`
`
`The Product necessarily includes a receiver configured to receive a request message
`
`19.
`
`including data indicating requested media content (e.g., the Product must have infrastructure to
`
`receive a request to store recorded media content or to stream recorded media content on a
`
`smartphone; additionally, the request message must contain data that identifies the content to be
`
`stored or streamed) and a consumer device identifier corresponding to a consumer device (e.g., the
`
`user credentials are used to access the contents of the Product). Certain aspects of these elements
`
`are illustrated in the screenshots below and/or in those provided in connection with other
`
`allegations herein.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 5 of 11 PageID 5Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 5 of 11 PageID 5
`
`
`
`
`
`20.
`
`The Product necessarily determines whether the consumer device identifier corresponds to
`
`the registered consumer device (e.g., a user must be a registered user to access the Product’s
`
`services). Certain aspects of these elements are illustrated in the screenshots below and/or in those
`
`provided in connection with other allegations herein.
`
`21.
`
`The Product provides for both media downloads and/or storage, and media streaming. After
`
`a successful login, the Product necessarily determines whether the request received from a
`
`customer is a request for storage (e.g., recording or storing content) or content (e.g., streaming of
`
`media content). Certain aspects of these elements are illustrated in the screenshots below and/or
`
`in those provided in connection with other allegations herein.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 6 of 11 PageID 6Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 6 of 11 PageID 6
`
`
`
`
`
`22.
`
`The Product verifies that media content identified in the media data of the storage request
`
`message (e.g., request to record content) is available for storage in order to prevent data errors that
`
`would result from attempting to store content that is not available for storage. The Product must
`
`verify that the media content (e.g. specific recording) identified in the media data of the storage
`
`request message is available for storage in order to prevent data errors that would result from
`
`attempting to store content that is not available for storage (e.g., the product must verify a user’s
`
`ability to store media content is limited to a certain amount of time). Certain aspects of these
`
`elements are illustrated in the screenshots below and/or in those provided in connection with other
`
`allegations herein.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 7 of 11 PageID 7Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 7 of 11 PageID 7
`
`
`
`
`
`23. If a customer requests content (e.g., live streaming of media content), then a processor within
`
`the Product necessarily initiates delivery of the content to the customer’s device. The Product will
`
`initiate delivery of the requested media content to the consumer device (e.g., stream media content
`
`feed to a smartphone or tablet etc.) if the request message is a content request message (e.g., request
`
`for live streaming). Certain aspects of these elements are illustrated in the screen shots below
`
`and/or in screen shots provided in connection with other allegations herein.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 8 of 11 PageID 8Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 8 of 11 PageID 8
`
`
`
`
`24. The media data time data that indicates a length of time to store the requested media content
`
`(e.g. a user is allowed to store media content for a retention time period). Certain aspects of these
`
`elements are illustrated in the screenshots below and/or in those provided in connection with other
`
`allegations herein.
`
`
`25. The server must first determine whether the requested media content exists prior to initiating
`
`delivery in order to prevent data errors that would result from attempting to transmit media content
`
`that does not exist (e.g. the product must verify that a particular requested data is stored in the
`
`cloud). Certain aspects of these elements are illustrated in the screenshots below and/or in those
`
`provided in connection with other allegations herein.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 9 of 11 PageID 9Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 9 of 11 PageID 9
`
`
`
`26. After the processor determines whether the requested media content is available, it determines
`
`whether there are restrictions associated with the requested media content (e.g., time period, etc.).
`
`Certain aspects of these elements are illustrated in the screenshots below and/or those provided in
`
`connection with other allegations herein.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 10 of 11 PageID 10Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 10 of 11 PageID 10
`
`
`
`27. Defendant’s actions complained of herein will continue unless Defendant is enjoined by this
`Court.
`
`28. Defendant’s actions complained of herein is causing irreparable harm and monetary damage
`
`to Plaintiff and will continue to do so unless and until Defendant is enjoined and restrained by this
`
`Court.
`
`29. The `221 Patent is valid, enforceable, and was duly issued in full compliance with Title 35
`
`of the United States Code.
`
`30. A copy of the ‘221 Patent, titled “System and Method for Storing Broadcast Content in a
`
`Cloud-based Computing Environment,” is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`31. By engaging in the conduct described herein, Defendant has injured Plaintiff and is liable
`
`for infringement of the `221 Patent, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`32. Defendant has committed these acts of literal infringement, or infringement under the doctrine
`
`of equivalents of the `221 Patent, without license or authorization.
`
`33. As a result of Defendant’s infringement of the `221 Patent, injured Plaintiff has suffered
`
`monetary damages and is entitled to a monetary judgment in an amount adequate to compensate
`
`for Defendant’s past infringement, together with interests and costs.
`
`34. Plaintiff is in compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 287.
`
`35. As such, Plaintiff is entitled to compensation for any continuing and/or future infringement
`
`of the `221 Patent up until the date that Defendant ceases its infringing activities.
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`36. Rothschild Broadcast Distribution Systems, under Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure, requests a trial by jury of any issues so triable by right.
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 11 of 11 PageID 11Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 11 of 11 PageID 11
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff asks the Court to:
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`(a) Enter judgment for Plaintiff on this Complaint on all cases of action asserted herein;
`
`(b) Enter an Order enjoining Defendant, its agents, officers, servants, employees, attorneys, and
`
`all persons in active concert or participation with Defendant who receives notice of the order from
`
`further infringement of United States Patent No. 8,856,221 (or, in the alternative, awarding
`
`Plaintiff running royalty from the time judgment going forward);
`
`(c) Award Plaintiff damages resulting from Defendants infringement in accordance with 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 284;
`
`(d) Award Plaintiff such further relief to which the Court finds Plaintiff entitled under law or
`
`equity.
`
`Dated: November 11, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Jay Johnson
`JAY JOHNSON
`State Bar No. 24067322
`D. BRADLEY KIZZIA
`State Bar No. 11547550
`KIZZIA JOHNSON, PLLC
`1910 Pacific Avenue, Suite 13000
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`(214) 451-0164
`Fax: (214) 451-0165
`Jay@kjpllc.com
` Bkizzia@kpllc.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket