`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 1 of 11 PageID 1
`
`THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
`DALLAS DIVISION
`
`
`ROTHSCHILD BROADCAST
`DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS, LLC,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`FUZE, INC.,
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
` CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:20-cv-03365
`
`
` JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff Rothschild Broadcast Distribution Systems, LLC (“Plaintiff” or “Rothschild
`
`Broadcast Distribution Systems”) files this complaint against Fuze, Inc. (“Fuze”) for infringement
`
`of U.S. Patent No. 8,856,221 (hereinafter the “`221 Patent”) and alleges as follows:
`
`PARTIES
`
`1.
`
`Plaintiff is a Texas limited liability company with an office at 1801 NE 123 Street, Suite
`
`314, Miami, FL 33181.
`
`2.
`
`On information and belief, Defendant is a Delaware corporation, with a place of business
`
`at 3001 Dallas Pkwy., Ste. 140, Frisco, Texas 75034. On information and belief, Defendant may
`
`be served through its agent, The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209
`
`Orange St., Wilmington, DE 19801.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`3.
`
`This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. § 271 et seq.
`
`Plaintiff is seeking damages, as well as attorney fees and costs.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 2 of 11 PageID 2Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 2 of 11 PageID 2
`
`Jurisdiction is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 (Federal Question) and
`
`
`
`4.
`
`1338(a) (Patents).
`
`5.
`
`On information and belief, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendant because
`
`Defendant has committed, and continues to commit, acts of infringement in this District, has
`
`conducted business in this District, and/or has engaged in continuous and systematic activities in
`this District.
`
`6.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant’s instrumentalities that are alleged herein to
`
`infringe were and continue to be used, imported, offered for sale, and/or sold in the District.
`
`7.
`
`Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. §1400(b) because Defendant is deemed to
`
`be a resident in this District. Alternatively, acts of infringement are occurring in this District and
`
`Defendant has a regular and established place of business in this District.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`8.
`
`On October 7, 2014, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) duly and
`
`legally issued the `221 Patent, entitled “System and Method for Storing Broadcast Content in a
`
`Cloud-Based Computing Environment” after the USPTO completed a full and fair examination.
`
`The ‘221 Patent is attached as Exhibit A.
`
`9.
`
`Rothschild Broadcast Distribution Systems is currently the owner of the `221 Patent.
`
`10.
`
`Rothschild Broadcast Distribution Systems possesses all rights of recovery under the `221
`
`Patent, including the exclusive right to recover for past, present and future infringement.
`
`11.
`
`The `221 Patent contains thirteen claims including two independent claims (claims 1 and
`
`7) and eleven dependent claims.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 3 of 11 PageID 3Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 3 of 11 PageID 3
`
`
`
`COUNT ONE
`(Infringement of United States Patent No. 8,856,221)
`
`12.
`
`Plaintiff refers to and incorporates the allegations in Paragraphs 1 - 11, the same as if set
`
`forth herein.
`
`13.
`
`This cause of action arises under the patent laws of the United States and, in particular
`
`under 35 U.S.C. §§ 271, et seq.
`
`14.
`
`Defendant has knowledge of its infringement of the `221 Patent, at least as of the service
`
`of the present complaint.
`
`15.
`
`Upon information and belief, Defendant has infringed and continues to infringe one or
`
`more claims, including at least Claim 7, of the ‘221 Patent by making, using, importing, selling,
`
`and/or offering for media content storage and delivery systems and services covered by one or
`
`more claims of the ‘221 Patent.
`
`16.
`
`Accordingly, Defendant has infringed, and continues to infringe, the `221 Patent in
`
`violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`17.
`
`Defendant sells, offers to sell, and/or uses media content storage and delivery systems and
`
`services, including, without limitation, the Fuze enterprise cloud PBX phone system, Fuze Portal,
`
`and any similar products (“Product”), which infringes at least Claim 7 of the ‘221 Patent.
`
`18.
`
`The Product practices a method of storing (e.g., cloud storage) media content (e.g.,
`
`voicemail, etc.) and delivering requested media content to a consumer device. Certain aspects of
`
`these elements are illustrated in the screenshots below and/or in those provided in connection with
`
`other allegations herein.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 4 of 11 PageID 4Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 4 of 11 PageID 4
`
`
`
`
`The Product necessarily includes a receiver configured to receive a request message
`
`19.
`
`including data indicating requested media content (e.g., the Product must have infrastructure to
`
`receive a request to store recorded media content or to stream recorded media content on a
`
`smartphone; additionally, the request message must contain data that identifies the content to be
`
`stored or streamed) and a consumer device identifier corresponding to a consumer device (e.g., the
`
`user credentials are used to access the contents of the Product). Certain aspects of these elements
`
`are illustrated in the screenshots below and/or in those provided in connection with other
`
`allegations herein.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 5 of 11 PageID 5Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 5 of 11 PageID 5
`
`
`
`
`
`20.
`
`The Product necessarily determines whether the consumer device identifier corresponds to
`
`the registered consumer device (e.g., a user must be a registered user to access the Product’s
`
`services). Certain aspects of these elements are illustrated in the screenshots below and/or in those
`
`provided in connection with other allegations herein.
`
`21.
`
`The Product provides for both media downloads and/or storage, and media streaming. After
`
`a successful login, the Product necessarily determines whether the request received from a
`
`customer is a request for storage (e.g., recording or storing content) or content (e.g., streaming of
`
`media content). Certain aspects of these elements are illustrated in the screenshots below and/or
`
`in those provided in connection with other allegations herein.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 6 of 11 PageID 6Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 6 of 11 PageID 6
`
`
`
`
`
`22.
`
`The Product verifies that media content identified in the media data of the storage request
`
`message (e.g., request to record content) is available for storage in order to prevent data errors that
`
`would result from attempting to store content that is not available for storage. The Product must
`
`verify that the media content (e.g. specific recording) identified in the media data of the storage
`
`request message is available for storage in order to prevent data errors that would result from
`
`attempting to store content that is not available for storage (e.g., the product must verify a user’s
`
`ability to store media content is limited to a certain amount of time). Certain aspects of these
`
`elements are illustrated in the screenshots below and/or in those provided in connection with other
`
`allegations herein.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 7 of 11 PageID 7Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 7 of 11 PageID 7
`
`
`
`
`
`23. If a customer requests content (e.g., live streaming of media content), then a processor within
`
`the Product necessarily initiates delivery of the content to the customer’s device. The Product will
`
`initiate delivery of the requested media content to the consumer device (e.g., stream media content
`
`feed to a smartphone or tablet etc.) if the request message is a content request message (e.g., request
`
`for live streaming). Certain aspects of these elements are illustrated in the screen shots below
`
`and/or in screen shots provided in connection with other allegations herein.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 8 of 11 PageID 8Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 8 of 11 PageID 8
`
`
`
`
`24. The media data time data that indicates a length of time to store the requested media content
`
`(e.g. a user is allowed to store media content for a retention time period). Certain aspects of these
`
`elements are illustrated in the screenshots below and/or in those provided in connection with other
`
`allegations herein.
`
`
`25. The server must first determine whether the requested media content exists prior to initiating
`
`delivery in order to prevent data errors that would result from attempting to transmit media content
`
`that does not exist (e.g. the product must verify that a particular requested data is stored in the
`
`cloud). Certain aspects of these elements are illustrated in the screenshots below and/or in those
`
`provided in connection with other allegations herein.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 9 of 11 PageID 9Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 9 of 11 PageID 9
`
`
`
`26. After the processor determines whether the requested media content is available, it determines
`
`whether there are restrictions associated with the requested media content (e.g., time period, etc.).
`
`Certain aspects of these elements are illustrated in the screenshots below and/or those provided in
`
`connection with other allegations herein.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 10 of 11 PageID 10Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 10 of 11 PageID 10
`
`
`
`27. Defendant’s actions complained of herein will continue unless Defendant is enjoined by this
`Court.
`
`28. Defendant’s actions complained of herein is causing irreparable harm and monetary damage
`
`to Plaintiff and will continue to do so unless and until Defendant is enjoined and restrained by this
`
`Court.
`
`29. The `221 Patent is valid, enforceable, and was duly issued in full compliance with Title 35
`
`of the United States Code.
`
`30. A copy of the ‘221 Patent, titled “System and Method for Storing Broadcast Content in a
`
`Cloud-based Computing Environment,” is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`31. By engaging in the conduct described herein, Defendant has injured Plaintiff and is liable
`
`for infringement of the `221 Patent, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 271.
`
`32. Defendant has committed these acts of literal infringement, or infringement under the doctrine
`
`of equivalents of the `221 Patent, without license or authorization.
`
`33. As a result of Defendant’s infringement of the `221 Patent, injured Plaintiff has suffered
`
`monetary damages and is entitled to a monetary judgment in an amount adequate to compensate
`
`for Defendant’s past infringement, together with interests and costs.
`
`34. Plaintiff is in compliance with 35 U.S.C. § 287.
`
`35. As such, Plaintiff is entitled to compensation for any continuing and/or future infringement
`
`of the `221 Patent up until the date that Defendant ceases its infringing activities.
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`36. Rothschild Broadcast Distribution Systems, under Rule 38 of the Federal Rules of Civil
`
`Procedure, requests a trial by jury of any issues so triable by right.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 11 of 11 PageID 11Case 3:20-cv-03365-N Document 1 Filed 11/11/20 Page 11 of 11 PageID 11
`
`
`
`WHEREFORE, Plaintiff asks the Court to:
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`(a) Enter judgment for Plaintiff on this Complaint on all cases of action asserted herein;
`
`(b) Enter an Order enjoining Defendant, its agents, officers, servants, employees, attorneys, and
`
`all persons in active concert or participation with Defendant who receives notice of the order from
`
`further infringement of United States Patent No. 8,856,221 (or, in the alternative, awarding
`
`Plaintiff running royalty from the time judgment going forward);
`
`(c) Award Plaintiff damages resulting from Defendants infringement in accordance with 35 U.S.C.
`
`§ 284;
`
`(d) Award Plaintiff such further relief to which the Court finds Plaintiff entitled under law or
`
`equity.
`
`Dated: November 11, 2020
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Jay Johnson
`JAY JOHNSON
`State Bar No. 24067322
`D. BRADLEY KIZZIA
`State Bar No. 11547550
`KIZZIA JOHNSON, PLLC
`1910 Pacific Avenue, Suite 13000
`Dallas, Texas 75201
`(214) 451-0164
`Fax: (214) 451-0165
`Jay@kjpllc.com
` Bkizzia@kpllc.com
`
`ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`