`
`Office of the Clerk
`United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
`Post Office Box 193939
`San Francisco, California 94119-3939
`415-355-8000
`
`July 21, 2021
`
`21-16210
`3:20-cv-05787-SI
`Children's Health Defense v. Facebook, Inc., et al
`
`
`
`
`Molly C. Dwyer
`Clerk of Court
`
`
`No.:
`D.C. No.:
`Short Title:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dear Appellant/Counsel
`
`A copy of your notice of appeal/petition has been received in the Clerk's office of
`the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of
`Appeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. You must
`indicate this Court of Appeals docket number whenever you communicate with
`this court regarding this case.
`
`Motions filed along with the notice of appeal in the district court are not
`automatically transferred to this court for filing. Any motions seeking relief from
`this court must be separately filed in this court's docket.
`
`Please furnish this docket number immediately to the court reporter if you place an
`order, or have placed an order, for portions of the trial transcripts. The court
`reporter will need this docket number when communicating with this court.
`
`The due dates for filing the parties' briefs and otherwise perfecting the appeal
`have been set by the enclosed "Time Schedule Order," pursuant to applicable
`FRAP rules. These dates can be extended only by court order. Failure of the
`appellant to comply with the time schedule order will result in automatic
`dismissal of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1.
`
`
`
`Case: 21-16210, 07/21/2021, ID: 12178719, DktEntry: 1-1, Page 2 of 3
`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`
`FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
`
`FILED
`
`JUL 21 2021
`
`U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
`
`MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`No. 21-16210
`
`D.C. No. 3:20-cv-05787-SI
`U.S. District Court for Northern
`California, San Francisco
`
`TIME SCHEDULE ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CHILDREN'S HEALTH DEFENSE, a
`Georgia non-profit organization,
`
` Plaintiff - Appellant,
`
` v.
`
`FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware
`corporation; MARK ZUCKERBERG, a
`California resident; THE POYNTER
`INSTITUTE FOR MEDIA STUDIES,
`INC., a Florida corporation; SCIENCE
`FEEDBACK, a French corporation,
`
` Defendants - Appellees.
`
`
`
`The parties shall meet the following time schedule.
`
`If there were reported hearings, the parties shall designate and, if necessary, cross-
`designate the transcripts pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3.1. If there were no reported
`hearings, the transcript deadlines do not apply.
`
`Wed., July 28, 2021
`
`Appellant's Mediation Questionnaire due. If your
`registration for Appellate CM/ECF is confirmed after
`this date, the Mediation Questionnaire is due within
`one day of receiving the email from PACER
`confirming your registration.
`
`Thu., August 19, 2021
`
`Transcript shall be ordered.
`
`Mon., September 20, 2021 Transcript shall be filed by court reporter.
`
`
`
`Case: 21-16210, 07/21/2021, ID: 12178719, DktEntry: 1-1, Page 3 of 3
`
`Thu., October 28, 2021
`
`Appellant's opening brief and excerpts of record
`shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and
`9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.
`
`Mon., November 29, 2021 Appellees' answering brief and excerpts of record
`shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and
`9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.
`
`The optional appellant's reply brief shall be filed and served within 21 days of
`service of the appellees' brief, pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.
`
`Failure of the appellant to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in
`automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1.
`
`
`
`
`
`FOR THE COURT:
`
`MOLLY C. DWYER
`CLERK OF COURT
`
`By: John Brendan Sigel
`Deputy Clerk
`Ninth Circuit Rule 27-7
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
