`
`Office of the Clerk
`United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
`Post Office Box 193939
`San Francisco, California 94119-3939
`415-355-8000
`
`December 30, 2022
`
`22-17024
`3:21-cv-09004-CRB
`Marie Hammerling, et al v. Google, LLC
`
`
`
`
`Molly C. Dwyer
`Clerk of Court
`
`
`No.:
`D.C. No.:
`Short Title:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dear Appellant/Counsel
`
`A copy of your notice of appeal/petition has been received in the Clerk's office of
`the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of
`Appeals docket number shown above has been assigned to this case. You must
`indicate this Court of Appeals docket number whenever you communicate with
`this court regarding this case.
`
`Motions filed along with the notice of appeal in the district court are not
`automatically transferred to this court for filing. Any motions seeking relief from
`this court must be separately filed in this court's docket.
`
`Please furnish this docket number immediately to the court reporter if you place an
`order, or have placed an order, for portions of the trial transcripts. The court
`reporter will need this docket number when communicating with this court.
`
`The due dates for filing the parties' briefs and otherwise perfecting the appeal
`have been set by the enclosed "Time Schedule Order," pursuant to applicable
`FRAP rules. These dates can be extended only by court order. Failure of the
`appellant to comply with the time schedule order will result in automatic
`dismissal of the appeal. 9th Cir. R. 42-1.
`
`
`
`Case: 22-17024, 12/30/2022, ID: 12620452, DktEntry: 1-1, Page 2 of 3
`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`
`FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
`
`FILED
`
`DEC 30 2022
`
`U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
`
`MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MARIE HAMMERLING; KAY
`JACKSON, individually and on behalf
`of all others similarly situated,
`
` Plaintiffs - Appellants,
`
` v.
`
`GOOGLE, LLC, a Delaware limited
`liability company,
`
` Defendant - Appellee.
`
`No. 22-17024
`
`D.C. No. 3:21-cv-09004-CRB
`U.S. District Court for Northern
`California, San Francisco
`
`TIME SCHEDULE ORDER
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The parties shall meet the following time schedule.
`
`If there were reported hearings, the parties shall designate and, if necessary, cross-
`designate the transcripts pursuant to 9th Cir. R. 10-3.1. If there were no reported
`hearings, the transcript deadlines do not apply.
`
`Fri., January 6, 2023
`
`Appellant's Mediation Questionnaire due. If your
`registration for Appellate CM/ECF is confirmed after
`this date, the Mediation Questionnaire is due within
`one day of receiving the email from PACER
`confirming your registration.
`
`Mon., January 30, 2023
`
`Transcript shall be ordered.
`
`Tue., February 28, 2023 Transcript shall be filed by court reporter.
`
`Mon., April 10, 2023
`
`Appellant's opening brief and excerpts of record
`shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and
`9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.
`
`
`
`Case: 22-17024, 12/30/2022, ID: 12620452, DktEntry: 1-1, Page 3 of 3
`
`Tue., May 9, 2023
`
`Appellee's answering brief and excerpts of record
`shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and
`9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.
`
`The optional appellant's reply brief shall be filed and served within 21 days of
`service of the appellee's brief, pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1.
`
`Failure of the appellant to comply with the Time Schedule Order will result in
`automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1.
`
`
`
`
`
`FOR THE COURT:
`
`MOLLY C. DWYER
`CLERK OF COURT
`
`By: Janne Nicole Millare Rivera
`Deputy Clerk
`Ninth Circuit Rule 27-7
`
`