throbber
Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page1 of 22
`
`19-2155
`In Re: Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Products Liability Litigation (No. II)
`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
`FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT
`
`August Term 2020
`
`(Argued: December 2, 2020 Decided: December 8,2020)
`
`Docket No. 19-2155
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IN RE: MIRENA IUS LEVONORGESTREL-RELATED PRODUCTS LIABILITY
`LITIGATION (NO. II)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ABRA CONING, KAYLA TALLEY, TIFFANY HAUSNER, SHANE HAUSNER, SHELAIN
`COOPER, ALLISON SIMPSON, AMELIA HOLMAN MILES, JONATHAN MILES,
`JESSICA GUGLIELMO, MEGAN ROBINSON, KIMBERLY BLACK, CHAQUITA DUDLEY,
`KELLY RIEGEL-GREEN, DANISE HOFFMAN, JACQUELINE GOYENA, JANELLE
`PALLANSCH, BRITTANY GRECO, MISTY SOLOMON, DAPHNE HOUCK, HOLLY
`ALLEN, JENNIFER SANTIAGO, MELANIE HOWE, MISTY MCCANDLESS, ANGELA
`KLOPFENSTEIN, ADAM KLOPFENSTEIN, CATIE KESSLER, JACLYN SPETT, ABIGAIL
`MICHEL, CHERIE MCGEE, BRITTANY WILSON, BREANNA PIETERS, ELLEN BURNS,
`INDIVIDUALLY, DAVID BURNS, LAURA BURNS, WHITNEY WALKER, JESSICA
`WATSON, KARNA LYNNE PETTLON, AMBERLY BUCKNER, CARLEY HAMILTON,
`DANIELLA PAVELKA, ANDREA JOHNSON, CHRISTINA STEPHANIE ALBERTSON,
`ABIGAIL THIESING, AMANDA MASSIE, AMY EDWARDS, SHERRICKER RODGERS,
`ANNALISSA SANCHEZ, NICOLE VINCENT, LIANA ERB, SARAH MARIE WESSEL,
`KATIE MYERS, LATOYA S. THOMPSON, ASHLEY BABICH-ZACHARIAS, BETHANY
`VINCENT, WHITNEY MANCHEL WASHINGTON, LAUREN HARDWICK, BRITTANY
`S. SMITH, ELIZABETH HEAGY, BARBARA ANDERSON, SHAMARA VON LANE,
`CRYSTAL VAZQUEZ, BRITTANY COLLINS, ASHLEY NOBLES-HOBBS, SHAKARA
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page2 of 22
`
`CARTER, MIRANDA GLEDHILL, MELISSA TOLBERT, DEVON MAHLSTEDT,
`DANIELLE ADAMS, LAUREN CARMAN, ANNA CONLEY, STEPHANIE DAWSON,
`ANDREA GEE, VICTORIA LEE, LACEY LANGSTON SANDERLIN, ASHLEY AMBER
`COCKRELL, SHAWNA LOUISE COOPER, MARYSSA REESE, CARNESHIA CASON,
`KASEY GARRISON, ASHLEY STEED, STEFFANIE MICHELLE DENNIS, JESSICA MARIE
`PETERSON, KASEY JACKSON, LESLIE MARIE COAPMAN, LATRICIA ANDERSON
`JOHNSON, MARY MARGARET COTTINGHAM, SHAMEKA M. BRIDGES, PETERSON
`BRIDGES, LATONYA HOSKIN, KRISTEN DENISE BRYAN, SAMANTHA LIFORD,
`CHRISTI UTLEY, JESSICA STANLEY, MACEY BEELER, NOELLE HICKEY, CRYSTAL
`TAYLOR, VALERIE TOWNSEND, ANDREA VEGA, AMANDA EVANS, BREANNA
`WILLIAMS, MANDY MITLYNG, LYSSA KIRK, MARSHA SAPP HANKINS, LEAH
`FACKRELL, TIARA MITCHELL, SIOBHAN SCHALL, KATHLEEN CHEEK, BILLY
`CHEEK, NICOLE HAMILL, KAREAMA PATTERSON, KYLARA BOOTH, DANIEL
`PARSONS, CHRISTA DIEHL, VANESSA BOURGOIN, DANIEL BOURGOIN, KARA
`STANLEY, TIFFANY SAWYER, CAITLYN ABOULBA, KEYSA ELLIS, MARIA AGUILAR,
`ELLEN BURNS, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OR EXECUTRIX OR ADMINISTRATRIX
`OF THE ESTATE OF ANNE ALDEN BURNS, AMANDA CLARK, TAQUOYA
`KERYAWNA WILLIAMS, MARIA PITTS, HEATHER NICOLLE MCMULLAN, NICOLE
`LASSO, RANDI WHITE, HEATHER ONSUM STOOPS, JANEKA HAYNES, SHENEQUA
`PERDUE, RACHEL FREITAS, KATRINA EVERETT-CAREY, NAYELI JUAREZ-GARCIA,
`MELISSA FRANCES HALL, ELIZABETH ADAMS, SYLVIA GREER, NI'MATULLAH
`KING, MARIE SHIVER, SUSAN TOOMEY, MEGAN HARRIS, KATHRYN ASBEL, ASHLI
`GARNER, LISA VALLERY, BRITTANY NICOLE JAMES, SARA TESS SANBORN,
`ROBERT ZINN, KIMBERLY STIER, DEWAYNA DENILLE BROWN, LOIS MICHELLE
`PALMER, KELLI SALAZAR, JESSICA ROBERSON, STACY BRYAN, STEVEN BRYAN,
`REBECCA ELWOOD, AMBER HANSON, REBEKAH ROGERS, TESSA WATTS, SHEREE
`MITCHELL, LASHONDA ROBINS, MISTY REITZ, BERNESHA MEANS, SAMANTHA
`DAVIS, TAMATHA TUCKER-WHITAKER, MISTY COLEMAN-WOODS, SHARON
`CAIN, SHANNON WALKER, STEPHANIE SCHLUETER, KATHARINE WELLS,
`CYNTHIA GUNN, JESSICA HIXSON ROBINSON, JESSICA GARDNER, CATHERINE
`DIANNE BEITEL, CHRISTY NICOLE MCGREGOR, AMBER DARLENE PROUT,
`AMANDA LEEANN BARBER, ALETA BREK RICHARDS, ERICA SILVA, JOHN SILVA,
`III, AMY HODGE, JOANNA LYNN LUCERO, KELSEY RAMM, KATIE REBECCA
`LAWRENCE, KELLI BOYT ROWLAND, CANDICE SMALL, JADE A. LUDWIKOWSKI,
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page3 of 22
`
`SHAHIRA OSMAN, NAQUASHA RISER, LAUREN ELIZABETH SINGLETON, JETTA
`ALLEN, JULIANA CATARINA HERNANDEZ, TIRZAH MARIE ELLET, KAYLA SCOTT,
`TOMEKA WILLIAMS-JAMES, COURTNEY TRENNEPOHL, TIFFANY COLLINS, STACY
`CAMINO, KATHLEEN FOX, CHANTHINIA WHITE, BRIANNA PETERS, DEVINA
`WILLIAMS, CHAVON PLANGE, SADIE MILLER, STEPHANIE SELLERS, FREDDREKIA
`BRADLEY, STARLA MCCOLLUM, LACEY HUBERT, ANAIS FORCIER, JENNIFER URE,
`RHONDA PEZZULLO, RACHAEL NIKL, ALECIA CONNER, KIMMI VESEY, DEANNA
`MOONEY, MARLENE MENDEZ, CIERA TURNER, TYSHEA MOTT, MELISSA
`POLOMSKY, HEATHER KURAMOTO, JESSICA BIHLER, LAMARA WALKER, CANDICE
`BAILEY, ALYSSA JOHNSON, KRISTIN CARRICO, GLORIBI PASTOR, CHANDRA
`BROWN, JULIA MEACHEM, SHAQUANDA MCMILLION, LAKEYSHIA TATE, ASHLEY
`MCLUCKIE, KATELYNN HAMMOND, DORETHA SMITH, LAUREN HOLLOBAUGH,
`GEMBELLE HORLACHER, KIMBERLY BURKHART, KIMBERLY MACAULAY,
`MARISOL MARCANO, ASHLYN HACKWORTH-WILLIAMS, NADINE KELLAM,
`JONEL EDWARDS, ELIZABETH MONTANARO, STEPHANIE BREWER, ANGELINE
`STANGER, JESSICA ROSELAND, JACOB ROSELAND, NICOLE ASKIN, CHRISTIE
`EPPERLY, TIFFANY MOSLEY, NICOLE CLARK, NAOMI WILSON, PORSCHE
`PATTERSON, NATASHKA MILLER, KAREN CREAR, STACIE HUFFER, LATOYA
`HUNT, LAUREN ROBERTS, BRITTANY THOMAS, AMBER HODA, CHRISTAL BAUGH,
`ARIN BOEHMER, JENNIFER DRAYTON, CHRISTINA HOLLAND, NIKIA BROWN,
`ALANA SIRMANS, ROSANNA KNUDSEN, MICHELLE MORGAN, MAUREEN
`GARRETT, NICOLE PARKER, CONSTANCE STEELE, AMANDA GOODLET, KIMBERLY
`HENAO, BRIANNA BLACKMAN, ANGELA NORRED, JESSIKA ALLEN, PATRICE
`RENEE FRANK, CHRISTINA REID, REVA MCDONALD, CASSANDRA N. JOHNSON,
`FAITH LAW, JERALYN WILEY, JEFKIDA JOHNSON-STINSON, JALISA CRAPO,
`STEPHANIE GRADY, SIMIN KASHANI, IEACHA JACKSON, ALEXANDRA HAINES,
`HEIDI THOMAS, LATOYA KENDRIX, SARAH ANNE MCLAUGHLIN, TIERRA HALL,
`JAMISHA DYER, AMY AMMONS, STEPHANIE ADAMS, ANDREA LUCERO, JESSICA
`LYNN SIMMONS, KRISTEN CAMPBELL, LAURA BRYAN, AIDA LOZADA, TABITHA
`LEE, AMANDA PICHLA, LATORIA WOODALL, BRITTANY WATKINS, ERENDIRA
`CUEVAS, LINDSEY ROSS, CRYSTAL COVERT, CATHERINA ANDRADE, KENDRA
`WICKWARE, KELLY CICHETTI, ASIA SHAKESPEARE, SAMANTHA STAATS, HALEY
`HENN, JENNIFER LEGASSIE, DESHONDA KNIGHT, TABITHA SAYLOR, ELIZABETH
`K. MOORE, SIERRA MOORE, TAMARA WHALIN, BRITTANY HARSCH, KRISTEN N.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page4 of 22
`
`CHANDLER, BARBARA NAPIER, STEPHANIE BENNETT, JESSICA KILBOURNE,
`DONISHA BISHOP, MARGARET BENDER, CHELSEA M. SAWYER, GUADALUPE
`PINEDA, SHA.DEBRA COLLIER, VALERIE ARTHUR, CHRISTY S. MURPHY, JESSICA
`HUPMAN, JENNIFER SAND-SHEQUEN, DANA Y. COOPER, JENNIFER GUZDEK,
`TRICIA PONICKI, TRACY D. GOULD, CORTNIE SHORT, DAVID RODRIGUEZ, JESSICA
`NIESLAWSKI, KARLA M. DUELLEY, NATALEE WILLIAMS, STEPHANIE BURT,
`PAULA C. GARCIA, JULIE NELSON, HEATHER BAKER, DAPHNE FRANKLIN,
`ANDREA MARTINEZ, ESHIA DAVIS, JUANITA FIGUEROA, DAWN BREEN, KINDRA
`NELSON, AMBER R. DRYDEN, ASHLEY PEARSON, MELISSA S. HOPKINS,
`MARQUITA WILLIAMS, JESSICA CASH, ELIZABETH BRYCE, NICOLE PERKINS,
`MARY WALKER, MADISON FOWLER, ALAINA DICE, TONI STREETER, CHEETARR
`JACKSON, APRIL ROBERTSON, KELSEY HARRIS, SIERRA RADDEN, MARQUSEY
`EVANS, DALIA JASSO, KAITLYN SKLENAR, STEPHANIE PELLETIER, SONYA
`RAMSEY, CHEYLO COLLADO, DETRA FERGUSON, ALISON ASHCROFT, JEANIE
`LASCELLES, LORI ANNALORA, STEPHANIE STOCKMAN, TIERRA JACKSON, AMBER
`OSTERMILLER-FORD, AMANDA STEVENS, KATHERINE SOTELO, TONI IVY, ERICKA
`JONES-GEORGE, DONNA RAWDON, PAULENA WHITE, STEPHANIE CLARK,
`JESSICA CROUSE, KATI VALENTINE, ANALYCIA SANCHEZ, ERICA SMITH,
`GABRIELLE HOFFMAN, SAMANTHA WILLIAMS, SHAQUETTA FELDER, CHARMINA
`LEWIS, TANIA KENT, MARQUISA JOHNSON, NICOLE JACKSON, EMILLIE HOPPER,
`KRISTY COLLINS, SAMANTHA ALLEN, SARA WASHBURN, STEPHANIE TREAT,
`KIMBERLY MCKINNEY, TANIQUA BLETCHER, CRYSTAL RODGERS, SANDY TATUM,
`TIFFANY DEBUSK, AMANDA CRITES, ANISHA LONGMIRE, BETH BURTON, KAY
`PAGE, SHAVONTE JOHNSON, JULIA FERGUSON, DESIREE SAENZ, TRISTYN
`ARIYAN, DODIE ARNOLD, KIMBERLY MOULTON, JOAN REDFIELD, REBECCA
`DURDEN, CAROLYN SUTTON, TYMEIKA BASKIN, LILLIE BATTLE-EASON,
`RACHELLE LILLY, ANGELA HENDERSON, BRITTANY SHUMPERT, DANIELLE
`WEHRLEY, NICHOLE HITCHCOCK, JAMIE O'BRYAN, MEGAN DEAN, JOANNA
`MOMOKO CLINE, SHARI HERNANDEZ, KATHERINE JACOBSEN, LINDSAY MILLER,
`ANGELA ROSE PADILLA, JASMAN AL-SHWAIYAT, CHESSICA MAUS, CHRISTINE
`WILSON, JAIMER PELLER, ARLENE CORDERO, JULIE GONZALEZ, JENNIFER HULL,
`WENDY BROWN, AMANDA WAITE, TANAZIA MCCANTS, ALEXANDRIA ESTRADA,
`ALEXIS WALTON, KAYLA OWENS, CORNEISHA FOSTER, ERIKA NACKE, BRIANA
`GARNER, ELIZABETH PAIGE, SHARLA BERNDT, KESHIA BARNETTE, DEVON
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page5 of 22
`
`PINCKNEY, PORSCHE DAVIS, KHELEE SAWYER, DAFFNEY HICKS, ZEBERA
`LAUNIUS, CHARLA MYERS-PERKINS, WILMA F. MITCHELL, QUINEISHA JUDD,
`MOKEDA ALEXANDER, KENDRA HILL, VALIENCIA PARKER, DARNESIA FINKLEY,
`MARY NORTON, ASHLEY MANDOLINE, JESSICA WATSON, COURTNEY SMITH,
`SARA SUTPHIN, KELLY HARRIGAN, JACQUELINE SHERLEY-DOUGLAS, NICOLE
`SWEITZER, TONJA ABIAKAM, JENNIFER DRAUGHN, HATTIE HANSEN, KHADIJAH
`ROBINSON, TONI E. COLEMAN, BRANDY FLETCHER, ANDREA ROBINSON, BRIANA
`STILLS, ALICIA THAMES, JESSICA GRABILL, VIVIAN DAIGLE, KELLY REIS, LESLIE
`MARTIN, ANGELA ROBINSON, GINGER KUCHLER, KARLENA JENKS, TESS MORSE,
`TAMMI MILLER, TINA WEBBER, AMANDA HARVEY, LAUREN DONALDSON,
`CATHERINE KING, BRANDI GEDDINGS, BRIGITTE COCKCROFT, ANN EVERETT,
`PEGGY POSPICHEL, SHONTON L. BURTON, SHANEEN THOMPSON, NICOLE
`AMARO, MICHELLE WHITTED, TERI CARMICHEAL, LAURA GABRIEL, BRIANA
`MCCRANIE, HEATHER HEMBERGER, TAMI UNROE, CHARLENE GOMEZ, CHELSEA
`COULTER, ALIYA QUICK, ARIELLE CATRON, BRIDGET COBURN, ASHLEY
`ANTKOWIAK, KATIE LYNN ARABIE, JILL GENOVESI, STEPHANIE COEN, JULIE
`GARCIA, KAYLA FAULKNER, MELISSA SNOW, AISLYNN POUNDS, CORA CLEAR,
`KARRIE SHIELDS, CHRISTON FORE, KIMBERLY HAMILTON, SHUNIKA
`HEMINGWAY, CASSANDRA BECKER, DANYELL RUSSELL, ERICA OWENS,
`CATHERINE MARTINEZ, KIMBERLY GRANT, JACLYN HERALD, BROOKE BIRGE,
`TIFFANI DALTON, STACY BETH SWENTON, BRANDI CARROLL, ASHLEY
`RODRIGUEZ, KRISTIN ANDRICK, KERI RICE, STEFANIE THACKER, LAURA FRISBY,
`LINDSEY GRADY, BESS PATTERSON, ALYSTA ESPINAL, AISHA CUFFIE, EMILY
`COKRLIE, TAMMY SCHATZBERG, JAIME POWELL, SHELBY LUANN MCCAIN,
`MELISSA FUSCO, JANELL DAVIS, ALICIA RUFFIN, ANGELA KOLEBUCK UTZ,
`JENNIFER BAXTER, AIMEE GALLOWAY, TINA PERSONETTE, HANNAH RUTLEDGE,
`KATIE ARABIE, TONINA BARTLES, CATHERINE JENSEN, BRIANNA SMITH,
`SHANEKUA WATKINS, DESIREE LEMASTER, APRIL GALLOWAY, QUASHUNNA
`MILLER, RACHEL MCINTYRE, SUNDRIA CARROLL, DENISE FORD, VICTORIA
`KYAKUWA, SHANTELLA BROWN SANDERS, GRACE DIXON, CHANELL WINN,
`ASHA' ANA THOMAS, LINDSEY CADWELL, ROBIN COLEMAN, AMANDA SAILORS,
`LAURA BOYCE, MICHELLE THOMAS, LISA KUEHL, JERRY JANE WYNNE,
`CHYNEICE OLIVER, CYNTHIA MAURO, DANIELLE HOLT, ANDREA NOVAK,
`MICHELLE KAPLAN, LYCIA SLEDGE, QUANTASHIA MOSLEY-MORRIS, LATOYA
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page6 of 22
`
`STEVENSON, DONNA HARRIS, KAYLA CLAYTON, SEDONA BLAKE, KAMILLE
`TURNBOW, CINDEL DOWNS, CANDICE ARNWINE, ALYXIS FELTUS, DEVON
`PARKER, KIERA MCCLENDON, CATHERINE GODFREY, KATIE DECKER, LATASHA
`MONET, EBONY RAY, CHARLES MONET, ANDREA EASTER, WHITNEY ROBERTS,
`SHANELLE HARRIS, JILL SNEED, JOY MYERS, KEONA BURTON, PAIGE OLSON,
`MARY JO TRACEY, TANISHA JONES, CHRISTINA RAY, LATARSHA PASCHAL, EMILY
`SPRINGER, RACHEL ELIZABETH SAMMONS, ERICA RODRIGUEZ, LARISSA WAY,
`MICHELLE VAETH, RIKKI SATTERFIELD, LEQUITA NEELY, TAMEKIA PERTEET,
`MELISSA MARTIN, NICHOLE THOMAS, ELIZABETH OLSON, KIMBERLY TAFFER,
`KAITLIN STRINGFELLOW, MAGAN WILLS, DAVID STRINGFELLOW, HOPE GAYLE,
`ALFREDA BOLDEN, SYLVIA HAGANS, LAVONDA LEWIS, JENNIFER SISSON,
`RICKEYA FREEMAN, CHANDRA MASON, CALLIE JORDAN, ROXANNE BENDICK,
`ASHLEY MCCUNE, COSETTE POSORSKI, OLUSHOLA WALKER, MICHELLE
`RUTHERFORD, NIJA JOHNSON, AMBER LARGE, TASHENA EASON, KHALILAH
`BOWENS, SARAH JENKINS, LEAH SOUTHARD, MAURISSA HARRIS, CLARITY
`PAVON-MOORE, NICOLE MAJOR, TANKIA RHODES, CARRIE THOMPSON, CARRIE
`THOMPSON, DYONCHE WILLIS, KIMBERLY BARROW, ADRIENNE SEUZENEAU,
`DAVITA ROBINSON, ROSEAN MOORE, JENNIFER DUCRE, MADONNA LYNN
`DUGAS, KALENA WILLIAMS, LARYNA LEWIS, MARIAN CALE, MARIAN CALE,
`JULIE SPENCER, GASHIA WILLIAMS, TYRUNSIA LOWE, SHANTRELL TALTON,
`ADRIAN CLARK, TONIA BLALOCK, ERICA WILLIAMS, SARAH HAFER, MEGAN
`MILLER, MONICA ANDERTON, KATOMIA MORRIS, MALKIA WOODWARD,
`JASMINE HOWARD, AUDREY JOINES, ANDRIA REED, KRYSTLE WOOD, AMANDA
`SANTORO, TRUEMEKA WALLACE, KENDRA PATTERSON, CHERYL DANIELLE
`BRODFEHRER, LATOYA GREEN, TAMMY MICHELLE HOUSE, SUZIE DANGERFIELD,
`SELENA IRVIN, LATOSHA LEWIS, MAGUILE SEYMOUR, ALECIA HENRY, CANDACE
`CROVETTO, GEORGIA FOSTER, KAQANTE BROWN, MAKEYTA ANDERSON,
`TACHICKA ROBINSON, TIERRA SLACK, JERICA SCHAFFER, KATRICE ROUSSELL,
`LAVONDA DAVENPORT, BRITNEY THOMPSON, LAUREN DAVREN, BONNIE
`CEDANO, DESHAUNNA JOHNSON, CHASSIDY FRUGE, KEISHA SEWARD, FALLON
`EVANS, NICOLE WHITE, KELLY CASNAVE, TYNA REESE, LORI HARTFORD,
`WILLETTE SMITH, BRANDI FAVORS, SHONTAE BLOUNT, JEVON BOGAN,
`SHADANA RELIFORD-PALMER, KATHLEEN MOLINA, L'TICIA SIAS, JESSICA
`OQUELI, ANITA LONG, JENNIFER LYNN CARR-AMONETT, CIARA HAYES, NADIA
`
`
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page7 of 22
`
`BODY, ALINKIE JOSEPH, JULIE LAVIGNE, EBONEE RICHARDSON, ELIZABETH
`DAMRON, NEDRA BELL, NATASHA MANNING, ANITRA WADE, LESLIE BERRY,
`CARRIE BREAUX, JESSICA JETT, TRICHELLE HARRISON ROBINSON, SCHAMEKA
`SANTA CRUZE, ANNE GUILLOT, PATRICE WEBSTER, FELITA DOOLEY, TRASULA
`CLARK, SHANTELL FIELDS, ANGELINA SHARIDAN, TERRAINE ZENO, SHARON
`TOUPS, ALISHA SCUDDER, KAYTLIN RAINES, LESLEE DIAZ, EBONY TAYLOR, JILL
`JOHNSON, SHERRIE LEWIS, SHARISH DAVIS, MELINDA JOSEPH, BRIGETTE MORRIS,
`PAULA D'AMICO, LEONA JIMMERSON, JENNIFER GIBLIANT, QUINTELLA LANDRY,
`RENEE PILCHER, DELILAH PEREZ, LESLIE FATZ, LEIGH RODERICK, JERRELDA
`SANDERS, HAILEY SHELTON, CINDY N. BEST, KATHLEEN RENATA SEEGERS,
`NICHOLE HILLER, JENNIFER SULLIVAN, KELSEY JACKSON, KEMISHA WILDER,
`ANNE WILSON, QUIANA BRYANT, KIMBERLY DAVIS, HEATHER GARCIA, JESSICA
`FULLER, LATONYA HILLIARD, AMANDA WILSON, AMBER FENNELL, NAOMI
`WILLIAMS, KELLY KENNEDY, MELISSA DILOSA, KIMBERLY JACKSON, SHAWN
`AUGUST, KAREN FRANCIS, BETTY WEMPE, HEATHER CRUVER, SEQUILLA
`GARRETT, SHAMIKKI SHIPP, KATRINA STEVENSON, KEIONNE THOMPSON,
`DONISHA BUTLER, SHELIA SPEARMAN, DANIELLE SCHMIDT, ROBIN GUIDRY, KIA
`BARNES, AMBER BRUEGGERT, JASMINE BAYNHAM, MONIQUE DUNMILES,
`JOZZETTE RANDLE, ALEXIS GALLIEN, LISA CLANTON, JESSICA WHITE, INGRID
`BUSTOS, RHONDA DIAMOND, JODIE SWOFFER, CHELSEY BAUDOIN, DENISE
`ANCAR, TANIKA BRUMFIELD, MARY SMITH, ANGELL NAVARRE, EVE SIMS,
`DANIELLE BUTLER, KYONDRA ALBERT, ANDREA BRUNO, KEYSHARA ARMSTEAD,
`BRIDGETTE BLUNT, KASSANDRA HALSTEAD, LINDSAY BOONE, JERESA MORGAN,
`JAMIE WHITELY, BRAYANNE FORD, ROSE RAINEY, NORMA THOMAS, KIMBERLY
`LANDRY, KIMBERLY STEWART, TONYA ALLEN, ARRIELLE HUGHES, HILLERY
`THOMPSON, CIERA LAMB, CHELSEA MARIE BRYANT, TEXAS BLUNDELL, FLORA
`JORDAN, JESSICA JEFFERSON, SHEENA CHENEAU, CAROLINA ROMERO, JASMINE
`LEFORT, DORIONNE HUNTINGTON, JASMINE SHORT, MARY DORAN, CAROL
`JACKSON, TONIA ROUEGE, TAMIKA HYDE, EBONI SHAW, BRIANNE TRIGGER,
`CHELSEA VAN WERT, TANERA DALE-NAPPER, NICOLE LOWRY, CIERRA DENISE
`GARNER, GINA BAKER, AMANDA WOLTERS, AMANDA GARCIA, CRYSTAL
`BARLOW, CHRISTOPHER BARLOW, NATALIE STEVANUS, KATRENA WARR,
`BRENDA YEAROUT, MYLAH NWANKWO, CLARA ALLEN, ANGELA SCHNEIDER,
`JACQUELYN SEIFERT, TAMMIE WIRE, KEISHA CURRIE, DIANA LEONARD, CONICA
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page8 of 22
`
`WINSTON, AMY CHOLEWINSKI, CARLA WALCOTT, VICTORIA HONPY, JAMI
`OLSON, DANIELLE KORTE, BRITTNEY M. GENTRY, JOSHUA GENTRY, KRISTA
`BURKE, SARAH BOETTGER, CARMEN MORALES, SABRINA BOISAUBIN, NORA
`MATA, JENNA TRUE, STEPHANIE BAKER, KATELYN TOWER, CHARLOTTE
`STRIBLING, HEIDI ROSENOW, BRITNEY MURPHY, HOPE GARCIA, ASHTON SILVIS,
`EMILIE SITZMAN, ROCHELL MYLES, ANJANET COLEMAN, SAMANTHA DARBY,
`KATE JENSEN, CIERA COLE, DENISE KEIDERLING, LISA FRAZIER, ERICKA TURNER,
`JASMIN THURMAN, KATIE SCHUBEL, KATHLEEN FRIZZELL, SHAKEEMA MOORE,
`JESSICA WEIN, JAYDE SEAFORD, JENA COOK, HOLLY JONES, KEISHA PIERCE,
`MELISSA LOVE, DESHERA MYERS, GRACEANN ROBINSON, SARAH OTTMAR,
`NICOLE NUNERY, ASHLEY DAVIS, LAURA DACUS, GLORIA FIELDS, APRIL
`JOHNSON, MARIA RODRIGUEZ, KATHLEENA HAYS, LISA SETTLE, TIFFANY FITCH,
`NICOLE MAZZANTI, WHITNEY HOMER, MEGAN ISHAM, DANICA HENDRICKS,
`MELINDA DOBSON, CHARLOTTE BROWN, MARY BURDETTE,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs-Appellants,
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`BAYER PHARMA AG, BAYER OY, BAYER HEALTHCARE PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`
`
`Defendants-Appellants.∗
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`SACK, CHIN, and LOHIER, Circuit Judges.
`
`
`Before:
`
`
`The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to amend the official caption to
`∗
`conform to the above.
`
`
`
`8
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page9 of 22
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the
`
`Southern District of New York (Engelmayer, J.) granting summary judgment in
`
`favor of defendants-appellees dismissing plaintiffs-appellants' products liability
`
`claims after precluding, pursuant to Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,
`
`509 U.S. 579 (1993), the opinions of plaintiffs-appellants' expert witnesses as to
`
`general causation.
`
`AFFIRMED.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MAXWELL KENNERLY, Kennerly Loutey LLC, Elkins
`Park, Pennsylvania (Lawrence L. Jones II, Jones
`Ward PLC, Louisville, Kentucky, and Martin D.
`Crump, Davis & Crump, P.C., Gulfport,
`Mississippi, on the brief), for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
`
`
`LISA S. BLATT (F. Lane Heard III, Matthew J. Greer,
`Kimberly Broecker, on the brief), Williams &
`Connolly LLP, Washington, D.C.; Paul W.
`Schmidt, Michael X. Imbroscio, Phyllis A. Jones,
`Covington & Burling LLP, New York, New York,
`and Washington, D.C.; Elmore James Shepherd,
`Shook, Hardy & Bacon, LLP, Houston, Texas; and
`Shayna S. Cook, Goldman Ismail Tomaselli
`Brennan & Baum LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for
`Defendants-Appellees.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page10 of 22
`
`PER CURIAM:
`
`Plaintiffs-appellants ("plaintiffs") appeal the district court's
`
`judgment entered June 21, 2019, in favor of defendant-appellee Bayer
`
`Pharmaceuticals Inc. ("Bayer") and dismissing all claims. By opinion and order
`
`entered October 24, 2018, the district court granted Bayer's motion pursuant to
`
`Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), to exclude the
`
`testimony of all of plaintiffs' experts. In re Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related
`
`Prods. Liab. Litig., 341 F. Supp. 3d 213 (S.D.N.Y. 2018). By opinion and order
`
`entered June 11, 2019, the district court granted Bayer's motion for summary
`
`judgment on the ground that the remaining evidence was insufficient to establish
`
`general causation, or in other words, that plaintiffs failed to offer evidence to
`
`suggest that Bayer's product is capable of causing the type of injuries from which
`
`plaintiffs claim to suffer. In re Mirena IUS Levonorgestrel-Related Prods. Liab. Litig.,
`
`387 F. Supp. 3d 323 (S.D.N.Y. 2019).
`
`On appeal, plaintiffs argue that the district court improperly
`
`excluded the opinions of their experts on general causation, erred in granting
`
`summary judgment for Bayer, and denied plaintiffs their right to obtain and
`
`produce evidence in discovery. We reject plaintiffs' arguments, and for
`
`
`
`10
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page11 of 22
`
`substantially the reasons set forth in the district court's thorough opinions, we
`
`affirm its judgment.
`
`BACKGROUND
`
`The Mirena Intrauterine System ("Mirena") is a plastic T-shaped
`
`intrauterine device ("IUD"), manufactured by Bayer, that releases a synthetic
`
`steroid hormone called levonorgestrel ("LNG") into the uterus to prevent
`
`pregnancy. Plaintiffs are women from across the country who allege that they
`
`developed idiopathic intracranial hypertension ("IIH") as a result of using
`
`Mirena.1 The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ("JPML") consolidated
`
`plaintiffs' cases in the Southern District of New York for pretrial proceedings,
`
`where plaintiffs filed their consolidated amended complaint alleging negligence,
`
`manufacturing defect, design defect, failure to warn, breach of implied and
`
`express warranties, negligent misrepresentation, fraudulent misrepresentation,
`
`fraud, and state consumer fraud violations.
`
`On June 21, 2017, the district court entered a scheduling order giving
`
`"priority" to the issue of "whether plaintiffs have admissible evidence sufficient
`
`
`IIH is known by multiple names, including pseudotumor cerebri ("PTC") and
`1
`benign intracranial hypertension ("BIH").
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page12 of 22
`
`to establish general causation of the harms alleged." S. App'x at 212.
`
`Accordingly, the district court scheduled a hearing pursuant to Daubert, "as to all
`
`expert evidence bearing on general causation." S. App'x at 214. The district court
`
`held its Daubert hearing April 9-11, 2018, at which plaintiffs and Bayer put
`
`forward seven and twelve expert witnesses, respectively, on the issue of general
`
`causation. Plaintiffs' experts were (1) Dr. Vincenzo Salpietro, (2) Dr. Conrad
`
`Johanson, (3) Dr. Philip Darney, (4) Dr. Lemuel Moyé, (5) Dr. James Wheeler, (6)
`
`Dr. Frederick Fraunfelder, and (7) Dr. Laura Plunkett.
`
`On October 24, 2018, the district court issued its 156-page opinion
`
`and order granting Bayer's Daubert motion as to all of plaintiffs' experts and
`
`denying as moot plaintiffs' motion to preclude Bayer's experts.
`
`Bayer then moved for summary judgment, arguing that without
`
`expert witnesses, plaintiffs had insufficient evidence to establish general
`
`causation. On June 11, 2019, the district court granted Bayer's summary
`
`judgment motion, and on June 21, 2019, entered judgment and closed all of the
`
`cases in the MDL. This appeal followed.
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page13 of 22
`
`DISCUSSION
`
`I.
`
`Standard of Review
`
`We review a "district court's decision to admit or exclude expert
`
`testimony under a highly deferential abuse of discretion standard." Zuchowicz v.
`
`United States, 140 F.3d 381, 386 (2d Cir. 1998) (citing Gen. Elec. Co. v. Joiner, 522
`
`U.S. 136, 141 (1997)). "A decision to admit or exclude expert scientific testimony
`
`is not an abuse of discretion unless it is manifestly erroneous." Amorgianos v.
`
`Nat'l R.R. Passenger Corp., 303 F.3d 256, 265 (2d Cir. 2002) (internal quotation
`
`marks omitted). "Significantly, the abuse of discretion standard 'applies as much
`
`to the trial court's decisions about how to determine reliability as to its ultimate
`
`conclusion.'" Id. (quoting Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137, 152 (1999)).
`
`Thus, the trial judge has broad discretion in determining "what method is
`
`appropriate for evaluating reliability under the circumstances of each case." Id.
`
`We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, "construing the
`
`facts in the light most favorable to the non-moving party and drawing all
`
`reasonable inferences in that party's favor." Burns v. Martuscello, 890 F.3d 77, 83
`
`(2d Cir. 2018).
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page14 of 22
`
`II. Daubert
`
`Under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, lower courts perform a
`
`"gatekeeping" function and are charged with "the task of ensuring that an
`
`expert's testimony both rests on a reliable foundation and is relevant to the task
`
`at hand." Daubert, 509 U.S. at 597. But while "Rule 702 sets forth specific criteria
`
`for the district court's consideration, the Daubert inquiry is fluid and will
`
`necessarily vary from case to case." Amorgianos, 303 F.3d at 266. Similarly, while
`
`the Court in Daubert identified four factors bearing on reliability that district
`
`courts may consider -- (1) whether a theory or technique "can be (and has been)
`
`tested"; (2) "whether the theory or technique has been subjected to peer review
`
`and publication"; (3) a technique's "known or potential rate of error," and "the
`
`existence and maintenance of standards controlling the technique's operation";
`
`and (4) whether a particular technique or theory has gained "general acceptance"
`
`in the relevant scientific community, Daubert, 509 U.S. at 593-94 -- the Court
`
`cautioned that "[t]hese factors do not constitute . . . a 'definitive checklist or test.'"
`
`Amorgianos, 303 F.3d at 266 (quoting Daubert, 509 U.S. at 593). So long as "an
`
`expert's analysis [is] reliable at every step," it is admissible. Id. at 267.
`
`
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page15 of 22
`
`Plaintiffs argue that the district court abused its discretion by
`
`(1) focusing on plaintiffs' experts' conclusions rather than their methodologies,
`
`(2) requiring the experts to back their opinions with published studies that
`
`definitively supported their conclusions, and (3) taking a "hard look" at the
`
`experts' methodology. Appellant Br. at 14-15. Each argument is rejected.
`
`We start with plaintiffs' third argument: that the district court erred
`
`by taking a "hard look" at each expert's methodology. This argument is central to
`
`plaintiffs' appeal, as they argue the district court's analysis of each expert was too
`
`searching. But as noted, an expert's methodology must be reliable at every step
`
`of the way, and "[i]n deciding whether a step in an expert's analysis is unreliable,
`
`the district court should undertake a rigorous examination of the facts on which
`
`the expert relies, the method by which the expert draws an opinion from those
`
`facts, and how the expert applies the facts and methods to the case at hand."
`
`Amorgianos, 303 F.3d at 267 (emphasis added). Accordingly, not only was it
`
`appropriate for the district court to take a hard look at plaintiffs' experts' reports,
`
`the court was required to do so to ensure reliability.
`
`Plaintiffs' contention that the district court impermissibly focused on
`
`plaintiffs' experts' conclusions instead of their methodologies is similarly
`
`
`
`15
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page16 of 22
`
`unavailing. The district court provided in-depth analysis of whether the experts
`
`applied their methodologies reliably. S. App'x at 52 (discussing in detail how
`
`Moyé's analysis "is flawed by serious methodological deficiencies"), 70-71
`
`(explaining the "number of methodological flaws" with Plunkett's analysis), 84
`
`(Wheeler's methodology was "flawed in multiple respects"), 102 (discussing the
`
`"hallmarks of unreliability" throughout Fraunfelder's analysis), 119, 121 (noting
`
`that Darney's report suffers from a broad overarching lapse of methodology and
`
`two speculative leaps rendering it unreliable), 139 ("infirmities precluding a
`
`finding of reliability as to three of the four steps" of Johanson's method), 149
`
`(Salpietro's opinion "does not meet any of the Daubert criteria for reliability").
`
`Plaintiffs may (and do) challenge whether the reliability analysis was correct, but
`
`plaintiffs have no basis to argue that the district court did not engage in a
`
`detailed analysis of their experts' methodologies.
`
`Next, plaintiffs argue that the district court erred by requiring the
`
`experts to back their opinions with studies definitively supporting their
`
`conclusions. Even assuming the district court did impose such a requirement, it
`
`did not err in doing so. We have held that "[w]here an expert otherwise reliably
`
`utilizes scientific methods to reach a conclusion, lack of textual support may go
`
`
`
`16
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page17 of 22
`
`to the weight, not the admissibility of the expert's testimony." Amorgianos, 303
`
`F.3d at 267 (internal quotation marks and citations omitted). In other words, an
`
`expert need not back his or her opinion with published studies that support his
`
`or her conclusion if he or she has utilized reliable scientific methods to reach that
`
`conclusion. But here, because the district court found that plaintiffs' experts did
`
`not "otherwise reliably utilize[] scientific methods," and the conclusions were not
`
`supported by other studies, the experts' reports were properly excluded. Id.; see
`
`Joiner, 522 U.S. at 146. Further, the court was well within its discretion to
`
`consider whether plaintiffs' experts' conclusions were generally accepted by the
`
`scientific community. The "general acceptance" of an expert's conclusion is one
`
`of the four enumerated considerations in Daubert, 509 U.S. at 594, and while a
`
`court need not consider the Daubert factors, it does not abuse its discretion in
`
`doing so.
`
`In sum, the district court appropriately undertook a rigorous review
`
`of each of plaintiffs' experts, and based on that review reasonably found that the
`
`experts' methods were not sufficiently reliable and that their conclusions were
`
`not otherwise supported by the scientific community. Accordingly, the district
`
`court did not abuse its discretion in precluding the experts' conclusions.
`
`
`
`17
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page18 of 22
`
`III. Summary Judgment
`
`We turn to whether the court correctly granted summary judgment
`
`in favor of Bayer. We conclude that it did, for we agree that no reasonable juror
`
`could find that it was more likely than not that general causation had been
`
`established based on plaintiffs' admissible evidence.
`
`State law controls on the question of what evidence is necessary to
`
`prove an element of a state law claim, such as general causation. See Amorgianos,
`
`303 F.3d at 268. The district court concluded that all fifty states "require some
`
`evidence of general causation in products liability cases involving complex
`
`products liability (or medical) issues." S. App'x at 175. This question was
`
`presented to us in a previous MDL regarding Mirena, and we affirmed the
`
`district court's holding to that effect there. See Mirena MDL Plaintiffs v. Bayer
`
`HealthCare Pharms. Inc. (In re Mirena IUD Prods. Liability Litig. I), 713 F. App'x 11,
`
`15-16 (2d Cir. 2017) (summary order). Plaintiffs attack that conclusion from the
`
`previous Mirena IUD MDL case and the district court's holding below, but, as
`
`the district court noted and is still true now, plaintiffs have failed to point to any
`
`state that does not have a general causation requirement for the type of claims at
`
`issue here. Rather, plaintiffs argue that some states allow evidence on specific
`
`
`
`18
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page19 of 22
`
`causation before or in conjunction with the presentment of evidence on general
`
`causation, but that is a challenge to the way in which the district court managed
`
`the litigation -- which is discussed below -- not the substantive state law that the
`
`district court applied. Accordingly, we are not persuaded that the district court
`
`erred in holding that there is a general causation requirement across all states.
`
`Alternatively, plaintiffs argue that even if they were required to
`
`satisfy a threshold general causation showing, their failure to do so was because
`
`the district court prevented them from obtaining and presenting such evidence.
`
`We also reject this argument.
`
`"A district court has wide latitude to determine the scope of
`
`discovery, and we ordinarily defer to the discretion of district courts regarding
`
`discovery matters. A district court abuses its discretion only when the discovery
`
`is so limited as to affect a party's substantial rights." Twinam v. Dow Chem. Co. (In
`
`re Agent Orange Prod. Liab. Litig.), 517 F.3d 76, 103 (2d Cir. 2008) (internal
`
`quotation marks and alteration omitted). In other words, "[a] party must be
`
`afforded a meaningful opportunity to establish the facts necessary to support his
`
`claim." Id.
`
`
`
`19
`
`

`

`Case 19-2155, Document 173-1, 12/08/2020, 2988597, Page20 of 22
`
`Plaintiffs first argue that the district court erred in granting Bayer's
`
`summary judgment motion for lack of evidence of general causation because the
`
`district court excluded all of their experts' reports instead of just portions of
`
`them. Plaintiffs therefore are suggesting that the testimony that they believe
`
`should have been carved out as admissible would have been sufficient to
`
`establish general causation. But plaintiffs have not explained which portions of
`
`their experts' reports should have been carved out as admissible (assuming, as
`
`the plaintiffs ask us to on this issue, that the district co

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket