`
`UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT
`
`Everett McKinley Dirksen United States Courthouse
` Room 2722 - 219 S. Dearborn Street
` Chicago, Illinois 60604
`
`Office of the Clerk
`Phone: (312) 435-5850
`www.ca7.uscourts.gov
`
`May 1, 2020
`
`Before:
`
`FINAL JUDGMENT
`
` FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Circuit Judge
` DAVID F. HAMILTON, Circuit Judge
` AMY J. ST. EVE, Circuit Judge
`
`MOLSON COORS BEVERAGE COMPANY USA LLC,
`Plaintiff - Appellant, Cross - Appellee
`
`Nos. 19-2200, 19-2713,
`19-2782, 19-3097 & 19-3116
`
`v.
`
`ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES, LLC
`Defendant - Appellee, Cross - Appellant
`
` Originating Case Information:
`
`District Court No: 3:19-cv-00218-wmc
`Western District of Wisconsin
`District Judge William M. Conley
`
`The judgment is AFFIRMED to the extent that it denies Molson Coors’s request for an
`injunction (and is challenged in Molson Coors’s two appeals) and REVERSED to the extent that
`the Bud Light advertising or packaging has been enjoined (and is challenged in Anheuser-
`Busch’s three appeals). To the extent that the injunction prevents Anheuser-Busch from stating
`that Miller Lite or Coors Light “contain” corn syrup, it is VACATED. (Because Anheuser-Busch
`has never stated this, or said that it wants to do so, that aspect of the order is advisory.) The case
`is REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. The
`first issue on remand will be whether any question remains for trial, or whether our decision
`instead wraps up the proceedings.
`
`The above is in accordance with the decision of this court entered on this date. Anheuser-Busch
`recovers costs in all five appeals.
`
`form name: c7_FinalJudgment(form ID: 132)
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
