throbber
Case 2:22-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 09/29/22 Page 1 of 28
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
`
`SEATTLE DIVISION
`
`
`
`CASE NO.
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`JURY DEMAND
`
`SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
`COMMISSION,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`JUSTIN COSTELLO and
`DAVID FERRARO
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or the “Commission”), for its
`
`complaint against Defendants Justin Costello (“Costello”) and David Ferraro (“Ferraro”) alleges
`
`as follows:
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`SEC V. COSTELLO ET AL.
`
`
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission
`100 Pearl Street, Suite 20-100
`New York, NY 10004-2616
`(212) 336-1100
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 09/29/22 Page 2 of 28
`
`
`
`SUMMARY
`
`1.
`
`This action involves Costello’s numerous schemes to defraud investors, all of
`
`which violated the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws. Costello, who claimed to
`
`be building a conglomerate in the cannabis industry, falsely portrayed himself to the public as a
`
`billionaire with a Harvard MBA, a military veteran, and a hedge fund manager with years of
`
`experience on Wall Street. Between at least July 2019 and August 2020, Costello used these and
`
`other fictitious credentials to gain investors’ trust and to defraud them out of millions of dollars.
`
`2.
`
`First, Costello disseminated materially false or misleading information about his
`
`educational and professional credentials to the investing public, including in a Commission filing
`
`for GRN Holding Corporation Nevada (“GRNF”), a publicly traded microcap company of which
`
`Costello was CEO. In a press release for GRNF, Costello also disseminated materially false or
`
`misleading information about a purported banking entity that Costello owned and that GRNF
`
`would allegedly acquire.
`
`3.
`
`Second, after using his fabricated accomplishments to become an investment
`
`adviser to a married couple, Costello sold the couple $1.8 million in stock at an over 9,000
`
`percent markup without adequately disclosing the markup to them. Costello further used the
`
`same advisory clients’ $4 million brokerage account to trade securities of companies in which he
`
`had an undisclosed financial interest and to conduct insider trading.
`
`4.
`
`Third, Costello obtained approximately $700,000 in investments from 13
`
`investors for a closely-held company that shared a name with GRNF but that was in fact a
`
`separate, private entity owned and controlled by Costello. As a result of Costello’s materially
`
`false or misleading statements, investors were led to believe that they were buying shares of
`
`GRNF, and not shares of the private entity.
`
`COMPLAINT
`SEC V. COSTELLO ET AL.
`
`
`
`2
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission
`100 Pearl Street, Suite 20-100
`New York, NY 10004-2616
`(212) 336-1100
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 09/29/22 Page 3 of 28
`
`
`
`5.
`
`Fourth, Costello obtained approximately $200,000 in investments from 19
`
`investors for a private company that Costello purportedly planned to turn into a publicly traded
`
`cannabis-related company. Certain of the investors attended a presentation during which Costello
`
`again emphasized his false professional credentials, including his purported experience as an
`
`investment banker in the cannabis industry. In addition, for at least $50,000 of the investments in
`
`the private company, Costello misappropriated the funds by depositing them in an account for
`
`yet a different company that Costello controlled.
`
`6.
`
`Fifth, from at least October 2019 through January 2021 Costello and Ferraro
`
`engaged in stock promotion schemes in which Ferraro recommended to his Twitter followers and
`
`the public at least five microcap stocks that Costello owned. Ferraro failed to disclose that he and
`
`Costello intended to sell shares of those stocks as the price of those stocks rose, or that Costello
`
`would pay Ferraro a portion of his profits from those sales. Costello profited approximately
`
`$683,000 from these schemes, of which he shared approximately $32,000 with Ferraro. Ferraro
`
`profited approximately $41,000 from his own trading in these schemes.
`
`7.
`
`Additionally, in July 2019, December 2019, and January 2020, Ferraro separately
`
`conducted his own stock promotion schemes with respect to two additional microcap stocks,
`
`generating profits of approximately $68,000.
`
`VIOLATIONS
`
`8.
`
`By engaging in the conduct set forth in this Complaint, Defendants violated
`
`Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (“Securities Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 77q(a)] and Section
`
`10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule
`
`10b-5 thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10-b5]. Costello further violated Sections 206(1) and 206(2)
`
`of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Advisers Act”) [15 U.S.C. §§ 80b-6(1) and 80b-6(2)].
`
`COMPLAINT
`SEC V. COSTELLO ET AL.
`
`
`
`3
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission
`100 Pearl Street, Suite 20-100
`New York, NY 10004-2616
`(212) 336-1100
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 09/29/22 Page 4 of 28
`
`
`
`9.
`
`Unless the Defendants are permanently restrained and enjoined, they will
`
`continue to engage in the acts, practices, and courses of business set forth in this Complaint and
`
`in acts, practices, and courses of business of similar type and object.
`
`NATURE OF THE PROCEEDING AND RELIEF SOUGHT
`
`10.
`
`The Commission brings this action pursuant to the authority conferred upon it by
`
`Section 20(b) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(b)], Section 21(d) of the Exchange Act [15
`
`U.S.C. § 78u(d)], and Section 209(d) of the Advisers Act [15 U.S.C. § 80b-9(d)].
`
`11.
`
`The Commission seeks a final judgment: 1) permanently enjoining the Defendants
`
`from ongoing or future violations of the federal securities laws and rules this Complaint alleges
`
`they have violated; 2) ordering the Defendants to disgorge all ill-gotten gains they received as a
`
`result of the violations alleged herein and to pay prejudgment interest thereon pursuant to
`
`Sections 21(d)(3) [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)], 21(d)(5) [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(5)], and 21(d)(7) [15
`
`U.S.C. § 78u(d)(7)] of the Exchange Act; 3) ordering the Defendants to pay civil money
`
`penalties pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(d)], Section 21(d)(3) of
`
`the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)], and, as to Costello, also Section 21A of the Exchange
`
`Act [15 U.S.C. §§ 78u-1(a)(1)-(2)] and Section 209(e) of the Advisers Act [15 U.S.C.§ 80b-
`
`9(e)]; 4) prohibiting the Defendants from participating in any offering of a penny stock, pursuant
`
`to Securities Act Section 20(g) [15 U.S.C. § 77t(g)] and Exchange Act Section 21(d)(6) [15
`
`U.S.C. § 78u(d)(6)]; 5) prohibiting Costello from serving as an officer or director of any public
`
`company pursuant to Section 20(e) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77t(e)] and Section
`
`21(d)(2) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(2)]; and 6) ordering any further relief that the
`
`Court may deem just and proper.
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`SEC V. COSTELLO ET AL.
`
`
`
`4
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission
`100 Pearl Street, Suite 20-100
`New York, NY 10004-2616
`(212) 336-1100
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 09/29/22 Page 5 of 28
`
`
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`12.
`
`This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to Sections 22(a) of the
`
`Securities Act [15 U.S.C. § 77v(a)], Section 27 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78aa], and
`
`Section 214 of the Advisers Act [15 U.S.C. § 80b-14].
`
`13.
`
`The Defendants, directly or indirectly, have made use of the means or
`
`instrumentalities of interstate commerce or of the mails in connection with the transactions, acts,
`
`practices, and courses of business alleged herein.
`
`14.
`
`Venue lies in this District under Section 22(a) of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C.
`
`§ 77v(a)], Section 27 of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78aa], and Section 214 of the Advisers
`
`Act [15 U.S.C. § 80b-14]. Certain of the acts, practices, transactions, and courses of business
`
`alleged in this Complaint occurred within this District. Among other things, Costello made
`
`certain of the false statements described herein, and placed certain of the trades described herein,
`
`while physically present in this District. Costello also made certain transfers to Ferraro from
`
`bank accounts owned by entities located in this District and engaged in stock promotion schemes
`
`with Ferraro while within this District.
`
`DEFENDANTS
`
`15.
`
`Costello, age 42, currently resides in La Jolla, California. Until August 2022,
`
`Costello was the CEO and sole Director of GRNF. Costello also was the Chairman of
`
`Hempstract Inc. (“Hempstract”) until May 2021. Costello is the majority shareholder of GRN
`
`Holding Corporation Washington (“GRN Holding (WA)”) and is the sole owner of GRN Funds,
`
`LLC (“GRN Funds”). Costello is not registered with the Commission as a broker or an
`
`investment adviser.
`
`16.
`
`Ferraro, age 44, is a resident of Radford, VA. During the time period of the stock
`
`promotion schemes described herein, Ferraro controlled a Twitter account under the handle
`5
`
`COMPLAINT
`SEC V. COSTELLO ET AL.
`
`
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission
`100 Pearl Street, Suite 20-100
`New York, NY 10004-2616
`(212) 336-1100
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 09/29/22 Page 6 of 28
`
`
`
`“@computerbux,” which had nearly 10,000 followers as of December 2019. Ferraro is currently
`
`employed as a “Business Transformation Consultant.”
`
`OTHER RELEVANT ENTITIES
`
`17. GRN Funds is a Washington limited liability company that is wholly owned by
`
`Costello. GRN Funds purports to be a private equity and capital management company. It also
`
`purports to provide banking services to marijuana-related businesses through a Costello-owned
`
`entity formerly known as Pacific Banking Company and now known as Pacific Compliance
`
`Corporation.
`
`18. GRNF is a Nevada corporation that, until June 2022, had its principal executive
`
`offices in Seattle, Washington. Its common stock is quoted publicly under the ticker symbol
`
`“GRNF” on OTC Link, an exchange through which over-the-counter securities are traded. Until
`
`August 19, 2019, GRNF was named Discovery Gold Corporation.
`
`19. GRN Holding (WA) is a Washington corporation with its principal executive
`
`offices in Seattle, Washington. GRN Holding (WA) is a private company founded by Costello
`
`and of which Costello is its largest shareholder and CEO.
`
`20. Hempstract is a Nevada corporation with its principal executive offices in
`
`Warden, Washington. The company purports to develop and sell hemp-based products. Costello
`
`was one of the initial founders of Hempstract, which became a publicly traded company after it
`
`was acquired by Riverdale Oil and Gas Corporation (“RVDO”) in August 2020. Today, it is
`
`quoted on OTC Link under the ticker symbol “HPST.”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`SEC V. COSTELLO ET AL.
`
`
`
`6
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission
`100 Pearl Street, Suite 20-100
`New York, NY 10004-2616
`(212) 336-1100
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 09/29/22 Page 7 of 28
`
`
`
`I.
`
`FACTS
`
`Costello Made False and Misleading Statements to the Investing Public, Including in
`a Form 8-K and in a Press Release
`
`21.
`
`On June 20, 2019, Costello, through GRN Funds, acquired 139 million shares—a
`
`majority interest—of GRNF. At the time, the company was named Discovery Gold Corporation.
`
`22.
`
`Costello purportedly planned to turn GRNF into a cannabis conglomerate by
`
`merging companies in the cannabis industry into GRNF.
`
`23.
`
`On July 1, 2019, GRNF filed a Form 8-K announcing Costello’s purchase of
`
`GRNF shares and his appointment as President, CEO, and sole Director of GRNF.
`
`24.
`
`The Form 8-K stated that Costello was a graduate of the University of Minnesota
`
`and the Harvard Business School.
`
`25.
`
`The Form 8-K also stated that Costello was the CEO of GRN Funds and described
`
`GRN Funds as a “private equity and hedge fund.”
`
`26.
`
`Contrary to these representations, Costello graduated from Winona State
`
`University, and not the University of Minnesota.
`
`27.
`
`Costello did not graduate from Harvard Business School. Costello has taken just
`
`one class through Harvard University’s Division of Continuing Education.
`
`28.
`
`29.
`
`GRN Funds has never been registered with the Commission as a hedge fund.
`
`Costello knew that he was not a graduate of the University of Minnesota or
`
`Harvard Business School. Costello also knew that GRN Funds was not a hedge fund.
`
`30.
`
`Costello signed GRNF’s July 1, 2019 Form 8-K containing these false
`
`representations.
`
`COMPLAINT
`SEC V. COSTELLO ET AL.
`
`
`
`7
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission
`100 Pearl Street, Suite 20-100
`New York, NY 10004-2616
`(212) 336-1100
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 09/29/22 Page 8 of 28
`
`
`
`31.
`
`The July 1, 2019 Form 8-K and accompanying press release were issued after
`
`trading hours that day. On July 2, 2019, GRNF share prices increased from $0.0028 to $0.03—a
`
`971 percent increase—on trading volume 400 times that of the prior day.
`
`32.
`
`Around the time GRNF filed the July 1, 2019 Form 8-K, GRN Funds’s website
`
`stated that it had $1.15 billion in assets under management. This statement was false.
`
`33.
`
`On November 12, 2019, GRNF issued a press release, which Costello drafted,
`
`announcing that it had signed “strategic non-binding letters of intent” to acquire ten financial
`
`services and hemp and cannabis companies. The press release asserted that the intended
`
`acquisitions would “result in the acquisition of a significant amount of assets” and cause GRNF
`
`to cease being a shell company.
`
`34.
`
`The press release described “Pacific Banking Corp.” as one of the entities with
`
`which GRNF had signed a strategic non-binding letter of intent and stated that Pacific Banking
`
`Corp. provided “specialized banking services” to its clients. Pacific Banking Corp. is majority-
`
`owned by Costello.
`
`35.
`
`The press release omitted that Pacific Banking Corp. is not registered as a state or
`
`federal bank, or as a money services business.
`
`36.
`
`Costello knew or recklessly disregarded that the statements in the press release
`
`about Pacific Banking Corp. were false or misleading.
`
`37.
`
`GRNF’s stock, which opened at $0.845 on November 12, 2019, the day of the
`
`press release, reached an intraday high of $0.98—an approximately sixteen percent increase—
`
`before closing at $0.89.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`SEC V. COSTELLO ET AL.
`
`
`
`8
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission
`100 Pearl Street, Suite 20-100
`New York, NY 10004-2616
`(212) 336-1100
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 09/29/22 Page 9 of 28
`
`
`
`II.
`
`Costello Defrauded Two Advisory Clients and Engaged in Insider Trading
`
`38.
`
`In July 2019, Costello became an investment adviser to a 65-year-old real estate
`
`agent (“Advisory Client 1”) and her husband, a 68-year-old retiree (“Advisory Client 2”)
`
`(together, “the Advisory Clients”).
`
`39.
`
`As their investment adviser, Costello owed a fiduciary duty to act in the best
`
`interest of the Advisory Clients at all times. Costello breached that duty in numerous ways.
`
`A.
`
`Costello Made Materially False Statements to the Advisory Clients, Failed to
`Act in the Best Interest of the Advisory Clients, and Failed to Make Full and
`Fair Disclosure of Conflicts of Interest
`
`40.
`
`Costello first met the Advisory Clients in January 2019. Costello made numerous
`
`misrepresentations to them concerning his background, including that he is the youngest hedge
`
`fund billionaire ever, that he has an MBA from Harvard University, that he is licensed to manage
`
`money and investments, and that he had served in the military with the Special Forces.
`
`41.
`
`These false credentials led the Advisory Clients to hire Costello to manage their
`
`joint brokerage account (“Brokerage Account A”).
`
`42.
`
`On July 14, 2019, the Advisory Clients opened Brokerage Account A and funded
`
`Brokerage Account A with $4,000,600.
`
`43.
`
`On July 20, 2019, the Advisory Clients signed a “Trading Authorization Form”
`
`that designated Costello as their authorized agent. The Advisory Clients agreed to pay Costello
`
`twenty percent of the profits in Brokerage Account A. Costello told the Advisory Clients that he
`
`was waiving his typical two percent management fee as a “friends and family” discount.
`
`44.
`
`The Advisory Clients provided Costello with discretion over, and full access to,
`
`Brokerage Account A. Costello accessed Brokerage Account A electronically using Advisory
`
`Client 1’s username and password. The Advisory Clients did not direct or execute any trades in
`
`Brokerage Account A.
`
`COMPLAINT
`SEC V. COSTELLO ET AL.
`
`
`
`9
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission
`100 Pearl Street, Suite 20-100
`New York, NY 10004-2616
`(212) 336-1100
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 09/29/22 Page 10 of 28
`
`
`
`45.
`
`Costello told Advisory Client 1 not to sign into Brokerage Account A while he
`
`was signed into the account. He also instructed Advisory Client 1 that, if contacted by Brokerage
`
`Firm A, she should falsely state that she placed all trades in the account and that she should ask
`
`the brokerage firm not to restrict her account in response to any trading activity.
`
`46.
`
`Although Costello had offered to develop a diverse financial portfolio for the
`
`Advisory Clients, all of the investments in Brokerage Account A were in microcap companies
`
`that Costello controlled or in which he personally invested.
`
`47.
`
`For example, Costello purchased 555,000 common shares and 250,000 preferred
`
`shares of Canal Capital Corporation (“Canal Capital”), for a total purchase price of over $80,000,
`
`in Brokerage Account A. Canal Capital was a shell company that Costello was directing others to
`
`promote on Twitter and whose stock Costello had purchased in his own account.
`
`48.
`
`On November 1, 2019, the Commission suspended trading in Canal Capital’s
`
`common and preferred stock. Prior to the announcement of the trading suspension, Costello had
`
`sold over 489,000 shares of Canal Capital preferred stock in his own account for over $109,000
`
`in profits. Costello, who did not disclose this trading to the Advisory Clients, did not sell any of
`
`the Canal Capital stock that he had purchased in Brokerage Account A on their behalf.
`
`B.
`
`49.
`
`Costello Engaged in Insider Trading in Brokerage Account A
`
`Costello also used Brokerage Account A to purchase and sell GRNF stock while
`
`he was the CEO and controlling shareholder of the company and in possession of material,
`
`nonpublic information.
`
`50.
`
`As GRNF’s CEO and controlling shareholder, Costello had a fiduciary duty and
`
`other relationship of trust with GRNF and its shareholders that obligated him not to trade on
`
`GRNF’s information for his personal benefit.
`
`COMPLAINT
`SEC V. COSTELLO ET AL.
`
`
`
`10
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission
`100 Pearl Street, Suite 20-100
`New York, NY 10004-2616
`(212) 336-1100
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 09/29/22 Page 11 of 28
`
`
`
`51.
`
`In fact, Costello knew that he should not purchase any GRNF stock on the open
`
`market because he was an insider with material, nonpublic information about the future plans of
`
`the company and, given his access to this information, purchasing stock may violate the
`
`securities laws.
`
`52.
`
`Nevertheless, Costello purchased over 670,000 shares of GRNF stock in
`
`Brokerage Account A in advance of a July 22, 2019, Form 8-K filing announcing that GRNF
`
`would change its name from “Discovery Gold Corporation” to “GRN Holding Corporation” and
`
`would request to change its trading symbol accordingly.
`
`53.
`
`The information contained in the July 22, 2019 Form 8-K was material because it
`
`signaled to investors that GRNF was taking actual steps toward becoming a purported cannabis
`
`conglomerate. GRNF’s share price increased 137 percent on the day the Form 8-K was issued.
`
`54.
`
`The information contained in the July 22, 2019 Form 8-K was nonpublic because,
`
`prior to the filing, it was not broadly disseminated to the investing public.
`
`55.
`
`Between July 22 and July 25, 2019, Costello sold the GRNF shares he had
`
`acquired in Brokerage Account A for approximately $150,000 in profits. Costello included these
`
`profits in an invoice that he sent to the Advisory Clients, who paid him twenty percent of the
`
`realized profits on Costello’s trading of GRNF in Brokerage Account A.
`
`56.
`
`Based on their agreement with Costello, the Advisory Clients made two payments
`
`to Costello totaling $37,916.05, including for twenty percent of the profits from the purchase and
`
`sale of GRNF stock.
`
`57.
`
`In October 2019, Brokerage Firm A informed the Advisory Clients that it had
`
`decided to end its business relationship with them.
`
`COMPLAINT
`SEC V. COSTELLO ET AL.
`
`
`
`11
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission
`100 Pearl Street, Suite 20-100
`New York, NY 10004-2616
`(212) 336-1100
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 09/29/22 Page 12 of 28
`
`
`
`58.
`
`At Costello’s instruction, the Advisory Clients thereafter opened Brokerage
`
`Account B at a different brokerage firm and transferred approximately $1.27 million from
`
`Brokerage Account A to Brokerage Account B.
`
`59.
`
`Like with Brokerage Account A, the Advisory Clients gave Costello full authority
`
`over the new brokerage account at Brokerage Firm B, in which Costello continued to trade
`
`microcap companies on the Advisory Client’s behalf until approximately February 2020.
`
`60.
`
`At the end of October 2019, the securities remaining in Brokerage Account A
`
`were valued at approximately $2.9 million. By the end of April 2020, the month before the
`
`Advisory Clients began to liquidate the stocks Costello had purchased in Brokerage Account A,
`
`the value of those securities had declined by approximately 65 percent.
`
`61.
`
`At the end of February 2020, the securities in Brokerage Account B were valued
`
`at approximately $299,700. As of the end of June 2022, the value of those securities had declined
`
`by approximately 97 percent.
`
`C.
`
`Costello Defrauded the Advisory Clients in Connection with the Sale of
`GRNF Stock
`
`62.
`
`Around the time that the Advisory Clients hired Costello to manage Brokerage
`
`Account A, the Advisory Clients also agreed to purchase nine million shares of GRNF stock
`
`directly from Costello for $1.8 million (i.e., $0.20 per share).
`
`63.
`
`This $1.8 million purchase price represented a markup by Costello of over 9,000
`
`percent from the price of $0.002 per share that Costello had paid for those same shares of GRNF
`
`stock the previous month.
`
`64.
`
`Costello failed to fully and fairly disclose to the Advisory Clients that he had
`
`acquired his shares of GRNF stock for $0.002 per share and that the $1.8 million purchase price
`
`reflected a markup of over 9,000 percent.
`
`COMPLAINT
`SEC V. COSTELLO ET AL.
`
`
`
`12
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission
`100 Pearl Street, Suite 20-100
`New York, NY 10004-2616
`(212) 336-1100
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 09/29/22 Page 13 of 28
`
`
`
`65.
`
`On July 23, 2019, the Advisory Clients paid for the shares by a cashier’s check
`
`written to GRN Funds.
`
`66.
`
`In approximately April 2020, after numerous requests, Costello sent to the
`
`Advisory Clients what purported to be share certificates reflecting their ownership of 9.5 million
`
`shares of GRNF stock.
`
`67.
`
`In approximately October 2020, Costello directed GRNF to issue nine million
`
`shares of GRNF stock to the Advisory Clients. Although the share purchase agreement for those
`
`shares was between the Advisory Clients and GRN Funds, Costello directed that new shares be
`
`issued by GRNF rather than transferring the shares he owned through GRN Funds and
`
`purportedly sold to the Advisory Clients.
`
`68.
`
`Despite having instructed GRNF to issue new shares to the Advisory Clients
`
`rather than transferring GRN Funds’s shares to the Advisory Clients, Costello never transferred
`
`the $1.8 million the Advisory Clients paid for the stock to GRNF.
`
`III. Costello Obtained Approximately $700,000 from the Sale of GRN Holding (WA)
`Stock Based on Misrepresentations
`
`69.
`
`From at least July to November 2019, Costello solicited the Advisory Clients and
`
`11 other investors to invest in a “family and friends” share offering for GRN Holding (WA).
`
`70.
`
`Although GRN Holding (WA) shares the “GRN Holding Corporation” name with
`
`the publicly traded GRNF, it is a separate, private company incorporated by Costello in a
`
`different state and initially owned solely by Costello.
`
`71.
`
`Costello misled investors in GRN Holding (WA) to believe, however, that they
`
`were receiving shares of the publicly traded GRNF entity.
`
`72.
`
`For example, Costello sent the Advisory Clients the subscription agreement for
`
`their investment in GRN Holding (WA) in the same email in which he sent the share purchase
`
`COMPLAINT
`SEC V. COSTELLO ET AL.
`
`
`
`13
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission
`100 Pearl Street, Suite 20-100
`New York, NY 10004-2616
`(212) 336-1100
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 09/29/22 Page 14 of 28
`
`
`
`agreement for the nine million shares of GRNF. The subject line of the email was simply
`
`“Subscription Agreement and Common Shares,” and in his email Costello did not differentiate
`
`between the two entities.
`
`73.
`
`Another investor (“Investor 1”) expressed to Costello that he and his father
`
`(“Investor 2”) were interested in investing in GRNF after seeing the performance of the publicly
`
`traded GRNF stock. Costello offered Investor 1 and Investor 2 a “friends and family” deal if they
`
`each invested $25,000. When Costello sent Investor 1 and Investor 2 the subscription agreement
`
`for their investments, however, Costello did not differentiate between GRNF and the entity in
`
`which Investor 1 and Investor 2 would actually be investing.
`
`74.
`
`Like the Advisory Clients, other investors in GRN Holding (WA) also believed
`
`that Costello was a billionaire with a Harvard MBA, a military veteran, and experienced in the
`
`financial industry. These investors also believed that Costello owned legitimate, revenue-
`
`generating businesses that could potentially be merged into GRNF.
`
`75.
`
`For example, Costello emailed Investor 1 and Investor 2 information about his
`
`purported “banking program” at Pacific Banking Corp. The materials described Pacific Banking
`
`Corp. as providing “safe, secure & compliant cannabis banking.” As alleged above, Pacific
`
`Banking Corp. was not registered to conduct business as a bank or money services business.
`
`76.
`
`In total, Costello obtained approximately $700,000 in investments for GRN
`
`Holding (WA) from 13 investors, including $250,000 from the Advisory Clients and $25,000
`
`from each of Investor 1 and Investor 2.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT
`SEC V. COSTELLO ET AL.
`
`
`
`14
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission
`100 Pearl Street, Suite 20-100
`New York, NY 10004-2616
`(212) 336-1100
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 09/29/22 Page 15 of 28
`
`
`
`IV. Costello Obtained Approximately $200,000 from the Sale of Hempstract Stock
`Based on Misrepresentations and then Misappropriated a Portion of the Funds
`
`77.
`
`Beginning in at least January 2020, Costello began purchasing shares of RVDO
`
`on the open market. Costello planned to merge Hempstract, a private company that he co-owned,
`
`into RVDO.
`
`78.
`
`79.
`
`Costello made misrepresentations to secure investments for Hempstract.
`
`For example, in approximately March 2020, Costello made a presentation to
`
`potential investors, pitching an opportunity to purchase shares of Hempstract before it became a
`
`public company. During that meeting, Costello falsely stated that he had sixteen years of
`
`investment banking experience on Wall Street, that he was a banker in the cannabis industry who
`
`managed money for over 400 clients, and that he had over a billion dollars of equity in his own
`
`fund. Each of those representations was false.
`
`80.
`
`Costello also told potential investors that any shares they purchased would be
`
`restricted from trading for six months, at which point they could sell their shares through a
`
`brokerage account. However, because RVDO was a shell company that was not an SEC-
`
`reporting company, any shares of RVDO would be required to be held for one year.
`
`81.
`
`In total, between March and August 2020, Costello obtained approximately
`
`$200,000 in investments for Hempstract from 19 investors. Of that amount, checks for
`
`approximately $50,000 from four investors were written to, and deposited in, a bank account for
`
`a separate entity controlled by Costello. Costello never transferred the funds he received for the
`
`four investors’ investments in Hempstract.
`
`V.
`
`Costello and Ferraro Engaged in Stock Promotion Schemes
`
`82.
`
`Costello and Ferraro met in mid-2019. Ferraro was a GRNF investor who had
`
`posted about the company on various investor message boards.
`
`COMPLAINT
`SEC V. COSTELLO ET AL.
`
`
`
`15
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission
`100 Pearl Street, Suite 20-100
`New York, NY 10004-2616
`(212) 336-1100
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-01388 Document 1 Filed 09/29/22 Page 16 of 28
`
`
`
`83.
`
`Ferraro controlled a Twitter account with the handle “@computerbux” that at one
`
`point had over 10,000 followers. Ferraro posted at least 7,900 tweets in 2019 and at least 5,000
`
`tweets from January through June 2020. Nearly 90 percent of these tweets referenced a specific
`
`stock or stocks.
`
`84.
`
`Costello and Ferraro used Ferraro’s Twitter account to perpetrate at least five
`
`stock promotion schemes (each a “Stock Promotion Scheme” and collectively, the “Stock
`
`Promotion Schemes”). In each Stock Promotion Scheme, Ferraro recommended a penny stock
`
`that he and/or Costello owned to Ferraro’s Twitter followers and the public. As he wrote in a
`
`January 2020 email to Costello summarizing their schemes, Ferraro understood that his
`
`“announce[ments]” on Twitter would cause the stock to “run[ ] on hype,” i.e., cause the stock
`
`price to increase. In his promotional tweets, Ferraro did not disclose that he and/or Costello
`
`intended to sell their own holdings of those stocks into the inflated market that Ferraro’s tweets
`
`helped create. Ferraro also did not disclose that Costello had agreed to pay Ferraro a portion of
`
`Costello’s profits from certain of the Stock Promotion Schemes.
`
`A.
`
`85.
`
`The Canal Capital Corporation (“Canal Capital”) Stock Promotion Scheme
`
`On October 7, 2019, Costello learned from an investor in Canal Capital, a defunct
`
`company, that former executives at Canal Capital had agreed to sell their shares of Canal Capital
`
`to the investor. Without that investor’s knowledge, on that day Costello began buying shares of
`
`Canal Capital on the open market, and by October 10, 2019, Costello had accumulated over one
`
`million shares of Canal Capital common stock (“COWP”) and over 740,000 shares of Canal
`
`Capital preferred stock (“COWPP”).
`
`86.
`
`Costello messaged Ferraro: “COWP and COWPP attack it hard [I] have 70% of
`
`float already.” Float refers to the total number of shares of a stock that are available for public
`
`investors to buy and sell.
`
`COMPLAINT
`SEC V. COSTELLO ET AL.
`
`
`
`16
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission
`100 Pearl Street, Suite 20-100
`New York, NY 10004-2616
`(212) 336-1100
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`

`

`Case 2:2

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket