`
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
`
`
`
`IN RE: SITAGLIPTIN PHOSPHATE (’708
`& ’921) PATENT LITIGATION
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MDL No. 19-2902-RGA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`C.A. No. 19-1489-RGA
`
`
`
`
`MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP.,
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`
`
`
`MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Defendant.
`
`
`JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
`CONCERNING ADMISSIBILITY OF EVIDENCE
`
`
`
`ME1 35245398v.1
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00101-TSK Document 94 Filed 09/16/21 Page 2 of 4 PageID #: 4806
`
`
`
`WHEREAS Plaintiff Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (“Merck”) filed a Notice of
`
`Deposition seeking to take the deposition of Abhijit Deshmukh pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
`
`Procedure 30(b)(1);
`
`WHEREAS, counsel for the parties met and conferred regarding Merck’s 30(b)(1) Notice
`
`of Deposition of Abhijit Deshmukh; and
`
`WHEREAS, Merck agreed to forgo the deposition of Abhijit Deshmukh if Defendant
`
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Mylan”) agreed to stipulate to the authenticity and admissibility of
`
`certain of Mylan’s Lab Notebooks (bates numbers identified below);
`
`Merck and Defendant Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. (“Mylan”) hereby STIPULATE, and
`
`request that the court ORDER, as follows:
`
`1.
`
`Mylan’s Lab Notebooks—Bates Nos. MYLAN_0104154-283;
`
`MYLAN_0104492-699; MYLAN_0104700-910; MYLAN_0111691-831; MYLAN_0105832-
`
`912; MYLAN_0109139-292—are authentic under Federal Rule of Evidence 901, and no
`
`additional foundation needs to be laid for the above documents to be admitted into evidence.
`
`Mylan will not object to the authenticity of the above documents or the admissibility of the
`
`above documents for any other reason, including on hearsay grounds, if they are offered as
`
`evidence at trial. Other than to admissibility, all other objections as to the use of the documents,
`
`once admitted, are reserved.
`
`2.
`
`This Stipulation regarding the above-referenced documents is only applicable to
`
`the above-captioned proceedings and to Case No. 1:19-cv-101-IMK (N.D.W. Va.), and may not
`
`be used in any other litigation against any party.
`
`
`Dated: December 15, 2020
`
`
`
`ME1 35245398v.1
`
`
`
`1
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00101-TSK Document 94 Filed 09/16/21 Page 3 of 4 PageID #: 4807
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MORRIS JAMES LLP
`
`/s/ Kenneth L. Dorsney
`Kenneth L. Dorsney (#3726)
`500 Delaware Avenue, Suite 1500
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`(302) 888-6800
`kdorsney@morrisjames.com
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Deepro R. Mukerjee
`Lance Soderstrom
`KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP
`575 Madison Avenue
`New York, NY 10022
`(212) 940-8800
`Deepro.mukerjess@katten.com
`Lance.soderstrom@katten.com
`
`Jitendra Malik
`Alissa M. Pacchioli
`KATTEN MUCHIN ROSENMAN LLP
`550 South Tyron Street, Suite 2900
`Charlotte, NC 28202
`Jitty.malik@katten.com
`Alissa.pacchioli@katten.com
`
`Attorneys for Defendant
`Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`MCCARTER & ENGLISH, LLP
`
`/s/ Alexandra M. Joyce
`Michael P. Kelly (#2295)
`Daniel M. Silver (#4758)
`Alexandra M. Joyce (#6423)
`Renaissance Centre
`405 N. King Street, 8th Floor
`Wilmington, DE 19801
`T: (302) 984-6300
`mkelly@mccarter.com
`dsilver@mccarter.com
`ajoyce@mccarter.com
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`Bruce R. Genderson
`Jessamyn S. Berniker
`Stanley E. Fisher
`Alexander S. Zolan
`Elise M. Baumgarten
`Shaun P. Mahaffy
`Anthony H. Sheh
`Jingyuan Luo
`Jihad Komis
`WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
`725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
`Washington, DC 20005
`T: (202) 434-5000
`F: (202) 434-5029
`bgenderson@wc.com
`jberniker@wc.com
`sfisher@wc.com
`azolan@wc.com
`ebaumgarten@wc.com
`smahaffy@wc.com
`asheh@wc.com
`jluo@wc.com
`jkomis@wc.com
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiff Merck Sharp & Dohme
`Corp.
`
`
`ME1 35245398v.1
`
`2
`
`
`
`Case 1:19-cv-00101-TSK Document 94 Filed 09/16/21 Page 4 of 4 PageID #: 4808
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED, this
`
`day of
`
`, 2020.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`ME1 35245398v.1
`
`3
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
