Search court records on "Snapchat, Inc.", page 7

Courts

Cheat Sheet
Query Builder
Jurisdiction Selector
Suggestions

Basic Search

Selected Courts

Recently Selected Courts

Clear Coverage information Done

All of these words

Any of these words

Exactly this phrase or word

None of these words

This word

Case filed between and

Most recent docket entry filed between and

With deadlines about

Has at least

Party’s Name

Firm

Attorney

Role

Publicly traded

Filter by

Search result types Dockets Documents

Opinions Motions Pleadings Exhibits

Signup
Login
More...
- Signup
- Login
- Features
- Enhance
- Pricing
- News
- About

All Courts
Federal Courts
Bankruptcies
PTAB
ITC

Filters

Display dockets
Display documents
- Decisions and Orders
- Exhibits
- Briefs and Motions
- Pleadings
- x Reset Selection

Like full text docket searches?

Get docket alerts, perform legal research, get updates of major decisions and orders, use our advanced analytics, and more. Request a Demo or create your account.

Track Search

Export

Download All

Active Filters

Displaying 84-98 of 4,112 results

sorted by

State of California, County of Fresno vs. Snapchat Inc 579 Toyopa Drive Pacific P...

Docket W17905082, California State, Fresno County, Superior Court (Aug. 31, 2017)

Francine Zepeda, presiding.

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case

State of California, County of Fresno vs. Snapchat Inc 579 Toyopa Drive Pacific P...

Docket W17905083, California State, Fresno County, Superior Court (Aug. 31, 2017)

Jon Kapetan, presiding.

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case

State of Illinois v. prop records of snapchat inc

Docket 17-MR-000968, Illinois State, Kane County, Circuit Court (Aug. 1, 2017)

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case

State of Illinois v. prop records of snapchat, inc

Docket 17-MR-000878, Illinois State, Kane County, Circuit Court (July 14, 2017)

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case

State of Illinois v. prop records of snapchat inc

Docket 17-MR-000960, Illinois State, Kane County, Circuit Court (July 27, 2017)

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case

SEARCH WARRANT KAITLYN HARRIS SNAPCHAT INC

Docket 17CT-MC00622, Missouri State, Christian County, Circuit Court (June 29, 2017)

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case

... California, County of Fresno vs. Custodian of Records Snapchat Inc 64 Market Street Venice...

Docket W17903813, California State, Fresno County, Superior Court (July 5, 2017)

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case

State of California, County of Fresno vs. Snapchat Inc 579 Toyopa Drive Pacific P...

Docket W17903370, California State, Fresno County, Superior Court (June 13, 2017)

Gary Hoff, presiding.

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case

USA v. INFORMATION ASSOCIATED WITH SNAPCHAT USER ID BIGYUSUF_NIGGA THAT IS STORED AT PREMISES CONTROLLED BY SNAPCHAT, INC.

Docket 1:17-mj-00148, District Of Columbia District Court (March 17, 2017)

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case

State of Illinois v. prop records of snapchat inc

Docket 17-MR-000519, Illinois State, Kane County, Circuit Court (April 28, 2017)

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case

USA v. Snapchat, Inc.

Docket 1:16-sw-06007, Colorado District Court (Nov. 8, 2016)

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case

Dave Vaccaro, et al. v. SnapChat, Inc., et al.

Docket 2:17-cv-02870, California Central District Court (April 14, 2017)

Judge Beverly Reid O'Connell, presiding, Magistrate Judge Alicia G. Rosenberg

Statutory Actions - Other

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case

State of Illinois v. prop records of snapchat inc

Docket 17-MR-000256, Illinois State, Kane County, Circuit Court (Feb. 27, 2017)

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case

State of Illinois v. prop records of snapchat, inc

Docket 17-MR-000239, Illinois State, Kane County, Circuit Court (Feb. 24, 2017)

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case

State of California, County of Fresno vs. Provider Snapchat Inc Attention Custodian of R...

Docket W16906790, California State, Fresno County, Superior Court (Nov. 10, 2016)

John Vogt, presiding.

Cite Docket

Analyze

Search within this case

<< 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... >>

STEP 2 of 2

Choose your membership type

Flat-Fee

Unlimited document access
Unlimited case alerts
Unlimited docket tracking
Unlimited search
Search/filter by motion
For-pay state court docs

$99/mo.

Excludes PACER and Gov’t fees

Pay-As-You-Go

$4/document
$3/ docket update
$3/day new case alerts
$2/day for docket tracking
$1/search in Federal Courts
For-pay state court docs

You Decide

Add-ons include Federal Analytics, Easy Analytics, and the Analytics Workbench.

Add your payment information

Need help? Lets schedule a quick demo.

What is PACER?

PACER is a government system to access US court records.

Why do I need it?

Docket Alarm uses PACER to access Federal Court documents. Under the flat-rate plan, we pass these fees on to your account without markup.

What will I be charged?

If we already have the document in our database, you will not be charged anything. However, if we do not, then we must retrieve it from the court and incur their access fee.

PACER charges $0.10 per page with a 30 page (or $3.00) cap for all documents, except transcripts which have no cap. For example, a five page document is $0.50 and a 50 page document is $3.00. Accessing docket sheets also incurs a fee if we do not already have the full docket sheet (again, max of $3.00). These fees are only incurred for Federal Courts and Bankruptcies.

Do other courts have fees?

Certain state courts, mostly in California, charge for access to some documents. When accessing for-pay state courts, you will always be given an option to accept or decline the payment.

Basic Free Access

We’re committed to keeping the law open. We provide free searches and document/docket views a week for documents already in our system. You have pages left for free viewing.

Note: free views don't apply to documents purchased from government systems, e.g., PACER.

Welcome

Docket Alarm has relationships with many large firms such as yours.

See if your firm has an account

Supplemental Search

Search for PTAB Motions

PTAB Analytics

TTAB Analytics

Basic Search

Filters

Party Search

Advanced

Selected Courts

Recently Selected Courts

Find PTAB Decisions

PTAB Analytics

Special PTAB Alerts

Orange Book

Directly Search Federal Courts

Search Trademark ...

Filters

Like full text docket searches?

Date Filed

Search Within

Dollars

Alert Sharing

STEP 2 of 2

Choose your membership type

Flat-Fee

Pay-As-You-Go

Add your payment information

Login or Join

Enter your corporate Email

Thousands of your peers are saving time and gaining a competitive advantage with Docket Alarm.

Join Docket Alarm to perform smarter legal research.

Download this document and millions of others instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join Docket Alarm and start performing smarter legal research.

Start tracking this docket instantly with a Docket Alarm membership.

Join thousands of your peers and start performing smarter legal research.

STEP 1 of 2

Millions of Documents | 15 Seconds to Signup

Hi !

Welcome to Docket Alarm

Welcome to Docket Alarm!

Explore Litigation Insights andManage Your Cases

Reset Password

What is PACER?

Why do I need it?

What will I be charged?

Do other courts have fees?

Basic Free Access

Welcome

Thank you

Check Firm Account

Explore Litigation Insights and
Manage Your Cases