throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`APPROVAL PACKAGE FOR:
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER
`
`21-572
`
`Correspondence
`
`

`

`DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH 8. HUMAN SERVICES
`
`‘nlvfll'
`
`: '4'
`
`iI
`
`
`
`-
`
`Public Health Service
`
`“has
`
`MAH _ 5 2003
`-
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockville MD 20%7
`
`Counsel to Cubist Pharmaceuticals. Inc.
`/
`
`/1
`
`RE: Cubist Pharmaceuticals. lnc.,'Small Business “’a‘tver Request ——‘
`Drug Application 21-572 for Cidecin (daptomycin for injection)
`
`'for New
`
`Dear Mr. . "‘
`
`This responds to your December 18, 2002, and December 3], 2002, letters on behalf of Cubist
`Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Cubist) requesting a waiver of the human drug application fee for new
`drug application (NDA) 21—572 for Cidecin (daptomycin for injection) under the small
`business waiver provision of section 736(d)(l)(D)' of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
`Act (the Act) (Waiver Request — For the reasons described below, the Food and
`Drug Administration (FDA) grants the request from Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Cubist) for a
`small business waiver of the application fee for an NDA for Cidecin.
`
`According to your waiver request, Cubist is a small business with fewer than 500 employees
`including employees. of your affiliates. You also note that NDA 21-572 for Cidecin is the first
`human drug application submitted to FDA by Cubist for review.
`
`Under the ACI, a waiver of the application fee shall be granted to a small business for the first
`human drug application that a small business or its affiliate2 submits to the FDA for review. The
`small business waiver provision entitles a qualified small business to a waiver when the business
`meets the following criteria: (I) the business must employ fewer than 500 persons, including
`employees of-its affiliates, and (2) the marketing application must be the first human drug
`
`application, Within the meaning of the Act, that a company or its affiliate submits to FDA.
`
`FDA‘s decision to grant-Cubist’s request for a small business waiver for the NDA for Cidecrn is
`
`based on the following findings. First, the Small Business Administration (SBA) determined and
`stated in its letter dated January 15. 2003. that Cubist has fewer than 500 employees including its
`affiliates:
`
`' 2| U.S.C. 379hthI)(D).
`7 'The term 'afliliate‘ means a business entity that has a relationship with a second bminess entity if, directly or
`indirectly — (A) one business entity controls, or bu the power to control, the other business entity; or (B) a third
`pany controls, or has the power to control. both of the business entities" (21 U.S.C. 3793(9)).
`“W._ “v
`
`

`

`Cubist Pharmaceuticals. lnc.
`Waiver Request t _.
`Page 2
`
`C&T Acquisition Corporation; Terragen Discovery. Inc; Cubist Pharmaceuticals
`Canada, lne.; and Cubist Pharmaceuticals UK, Ltd.
`
`Second. according to FDA records. the marketing application for Cidecin. NDA 21—572. is the
`
`first human drug application, within the meaning of the Act. to be subrrtitted to FDA by Cubist or
`any of its affiliates. Consequently. your request for a small business waiver of the application
`fee for NDA 21-572 Cidecin is granted, provided that FDA receives the marketing application
`for Cidecin no later than January 15. 2004. 1 year after the effective date of the size
`determination made by SBA.
`‘
`
`If FDA refuses to file the application or Cubist withdraws the application before it is filed by
`
`FDA, 3 reevaluation of the waiver may be required should the company resubmit its marketing
`application. If this situation occurs, Cubist should contact this office approximately 90 days
`before it expects to resubmit its marketing application to determine whether it continues to
`
`qualify for a waiver.
`
`We have notified the FDA Office of Financial Management (OFM) of this waiver decision and
`have asked them to waive the application fee for NDA 21-572. FDA records show that Cubist’s
`NDA 21 572 was submitted on December 20, 2002, and FDA was notified of the $533,400
`
`payment for the application on December 23. 2002. Cubist should receive a refund of $533,400.
`If Cubist does not receive this refund within 30 days of the date of this letter, please contact
`Donna Simms, OFM, at 301—827-5042.
`
`FDA plans to disclose to the public information about its actions granting or denying waivers
`and reductions. This disclosure will be consistent with the laws and regulations governing the
`disclosure of confidential commercial or financial information.
`
`If any billing questions arise concerning the marketing application or if you have any questions
`about this small business waiver, please contact Beverly Friedman, Michael Jones, or 'I'awni
`Scbwemer at 301-594-2041.
`
`Sineerel y.
`
`IS/
`Zane A. Axelrad
`
`/
`
`Associate Director for Policy
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research _
`
`."
`
`l
`
`

`

`Cubist Phannacculicals. lnc.
`Waiver Roqucst #
`Page 3
`
`BCC:
`
`,
`HFD-S M. Jones
`HFD~5
`B. Friedman ‘
`
`HFD—S
`HFD-S
`
`Chronological File
`Cubist Pharmaceuticals. Inc. waiver file
`
`HFM-l 10 C. Vincent/R. Eastep
`HFA~103 S. Farrah (RECORD ON PAYMENT AND ARREARS LIST)
`
`HFA~120 D. Simms - (REFUND PENDING)
`HF-‘ZO
`F. Claunls
`
`Drafted: B. Friedman 1/28/03
`Edited: O.Pritzlaff2/l9/03
`Reviewed: J. Axelrad 2/26/03
`
`Rcviscd punctuation; B. Fricdman 2/27/03,
`
`Reviewed and signed: .l. Axelrad
`
`February 27. 2003
`
`\\CD5029\PDUFA\\VAIYEPAPENDTNG\Cubist\0231014 2 .doc
`
`ll
`
`

`

`RedéétEd-_ji_?—_
`
`page? of trade
`sécfét and/0r -
`
`'confidential
`
`commerCial. -
`
`hinfOrmation'
`
`

`

`3‘
`
`1
`
`5: 6: DEPARTMENTOFHEALTH&HUMANSERVICES
`
`Public Health Service
`
`Food and Dmg Administration
`Rockville. MD 20857
`
`NDA 21-572
`
`Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`'Attention: David H. Schubert
`
`Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality
`65 Hayden Avenue
`Lexington, MA 02421
`
`‘
`
`Dear Mr. Schubert:
`
`Please refer to your December 20, 2002 new drug application (NDA) submitted under section
`505(b) ofthe Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for Cidecin® (daptomycin for injection)
`Intravenous Injection.
`
`On June 16, 2003, we received your June 16, 2003 major amendment to this application. The
`receipt date is within 3 months of the user fee goal date. Therefore, we are extending the goal
`date by three months to provide time for a full review of the submission. The extended user fee
`goal date is September 20, 2003.
`
`If you have any questions, call LTJ G Raquel Peat, Regulatory Health Project Manager, at (301)
`827-2125.
`
`Sincerely,
`
`{See apfigéd electronic signaturepage}
`
`Janice Soreth, MD.
`Director
`
`Division of Anti-Infective Drug Products
`Office of Drug Evaluation IV
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`fl
`
`

`

`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and
`this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
`
`Janice Soreth
`
`6/18/03 02:24:46 PM
`
`

`

`
`
` 6 DEPARTMENTorHEALTH3.- HUMANSERVICES PublicHealthSW09
`
`Food and Drug Administration
`Rockville. MD 20857
`
`NDA 21-572
`
`Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`Attention: David H. Schubert
`
`Vice President, Regulatory Affairs and Quality
`65 Hayden Avenue
`Lexington, MA 02421
`
`Dear Mr. Schubert:
`
`We have received your new drug application (NDA) submitted under section 505(b) of the
`Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act for the following:
`
`Name of Drug Product: Cidecin® (daptomycin for injection) Intravenous Injection
`
`Review Priority Classification: Priority (P)
`
`Date of Application: December 19, 2002
`
`Date of Receipt: December 20, 2002
`
`Our Reference Number: NDA 21-572
`
`Unless we notify you within 60 days ofthe receipt date that the application is not sufficiently
`complete to permit a substantive review, we will file the application on February 18, 2003 in
`accordance with 2] CFR 314.101(a). Ifwe file the application, the user fee goal date will be
`June 20, 2003.
`
`Under 21 CFR 314.]02(c), you may request an informal conference with this Division (to be
`held approximately 90 days from the above receipt date) for a brief report on the status of the
`review but not on the ultimate approvability of the application. Alternatively, you may choose to
`receive a report by telephone.
`
`Please cite the NDA number listed above at the top of the first page of any communications
`concerning this application. Address all communications concerning this NDA as follows:
`
`.... ~. _,
`
`

`

`NDA 21-572
`
`Page 2
`
`US. Postal Service:
`
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Division of Anti-lnfective Drug Product
`Attention: Division Document Room, HFD-SZO
`5600 Fishers Lane
`
`Rockville, Maryland 20857
`
`Courier/Overnight Mail:
`Food and Drug Administration
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`Division ofAnti-Infective Drug Products, BED-520
`Attention: Document Room
`
`9201 Corporate Boulevard
`Rockville, Maryland 20850
`
`If you have any questions, call LTJG Raquel Peat, Regulatory Project Manager, at (30]) 827-
`2125.
`
`Sincerely, \
`{Sec appendficlmnic signaturepage}
`
`Frances EeSane
`Chief, Project Management Staff
`Division of Anti-Infective Drug Products
`Office of Drug Evaluation IV
`Center for Drug Evaluation and Research
`
`

`

`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and
`this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`
`..__..-____.._____..-_-——
`
`Beth Duvall—Miller
`
`2/19/03 11:15:11 AM
`BDM acting for FVL
`
`. ~__-
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket