throbber
Table 10: Summary of Subject Disposition, Cubist-sponsored Phase 1 Studies
`(Population: All Subjects Treated)
`Sincle Dose
`
`Multi ule Dose
`
`Total
`
`E-“E-E-
`
`—m
`
`Adverse events - Cubist-sponsored Phase 1 studies
`Similar proportions of subjects in the daptomycin and comparator treatment
`groups experienced at least one AE during the Cubist-sponsored Phase I studies
`(62/240 [25.8%] daptomycin; 32/109 [29.4%] comparator). No single AE
`occurred in more than 5% of the daptomycin subjects, while injection site pain
`occurred in 5.5% (6/109) and headache occurred in 5.5% (6/109) of subjects in
`the comparator groups. The majority of ABS were mild (53/240 or 22.1% in the
`daptomycin-treated subjects, 30/109 or 27.5% in the comparator-treated subjects)
`or moderate (13/240 or 5.4% in the daptomycin-treated subjects, 4/109 or 3.7% in
`the comparator-treated subjects) in intensity. Marked AEs occurred in 2/240
`(<1%) of daptomycin-treated patients and no comparator-treated patients. Four
`AEs that were judged to be marked in intensity by the investigator were reported
`in three daptomycin subjects. These included facial palsy and syncope in two
`daptomycin subjects and diarrhea and vomiting in a third daptomycin subject.
`In
`single dose daptomycin studies 14.9% (18/121) of subjects experienced I or more
`AEs; no AE occurred in more than 5% of subjects.
`In multiple dose studies, 37%
`(44/119) of daptomycin-treated subjects experienced one or more ABS, and the
`most commonly occurring AEs (>5%) were injection site pain (7/119, 5.9%),
`injection site edema (6/119, 5%), increased blood creatine phosphokinase (6/119,
`5%), and headache (6/119, 5%). Table 11 below gives the frequencies of all AEs
`in Cubist-sponsored Phase I studies.
`
`12
`
`

`

`l::::
`
`Table 11: Adverse Events in Cubist-sponsored Phase 1 Studies (Population: All
`Sub'ects Treated
`
`ystem Organ Class/
`referred Term
`
`
`
`-
`-
`
`1 Least One AE
`
`dministration site conditions
`
`Single-Dose
`
`Multiple-Dose
`
`Total Clinical
`Pharmacolocv Studies
`
`Da-tomvcin
`
`‘=121
`N %)
`
`N=17 mm
`
`1 (0.8) “mu—Imm-
`1 (0.8)
`6 (5.0M"
`1 (0.8) mum-mm-
`
`--IGE---_-
`
`mum-m
`
`
`
`Elli!- -
`0 (0.0)m
`0 (0.0)
`0 (0.0)m
`0 0-0
`
`n'ectionsiteedema
`
`- dalaise
`
`0 (0.0 _-__M-
`0(00)
`0(00)
`6(5.0)
`3(3.3
`3(2.8)
`0(0.0)
`0(00
`6(55
`3 (1.3
`o (0.0
`3 (2.5
`.
`o (0.0
`0 (00
`m—_--lm--lml
`
`niection site crun'tus
`
`. mam-W
`IE=mm0 0-0
`
`mum—"MIKE!!-
`(mum—mmm
`mum-Ima-
`_—--—IIGE--lm-m-
`
`'nfection NOS
`
`'
`
`n‘u 'and -oisonin2 mum-mumm-
`WWW-mm-
`'—-—_-—-—--
`l-lood creatine phosphokinase
`l (0.8)
`2 (1.8)
`increased
`
`-
`
`.-"'\
`
`13
`
`

`

`oisorders
`
`issue and bone disorders
`Anhralzia
`
`
`
`mum-ma-
`Rack uain m
`. mum-m5-
`
`I ervoussvstem disorders
`
`II izziness (excludin veni 0)
`
`Mu
`
`m-
`0(0.0)
`0(00 “moral-[mumm-
`l 0-8 --IGE-_--—-
`
`I mesmesiaoramos
`.nsomniaNF—C
`
`l’ eproductive system and
`reast disorders
`
`- mmmmmm.
`-m-mll-lm-mm-
`mutual-IM-
`moron—m-
`l (0.4)
`0 (0.0)
`
`
`
`Ilvsmenorrhea —M-Im-
`
`- menu-Imam..-
`
`1(0.8)
`"MIKE!!-
`inus tain
`_--_-_—-Im-
`neczina
`ore lhroat NOS mum-Irm-
`’heezine mum-mumm-
`kin&subcutaneous
`l(O.8)
`l(0.8)
`2(0.8)
`issue disorders
`
`'
`
`ellulitis WEED-mm-
`llermatitisNOS
`0(0.0>
`1(0.8 "metal-“mumm-
`0(00 ”mm-Km-
`zemascbonheic
`_Mmm-mm--lm-
`
`_==mm-mm--Im-mm-mmn
`0(0.0 mill-MIKE-
`MUM-m-
`I—W-Im-
`
`u'ocedures
`“mm-mum-
`
`\nenension NOS mam-“mm.”—
`:
`Note: Subjects reponing more than one adverse event within a system organ class (SOC) are counted only once in the total hue for that SOC.
`Subjects reporting more than one adverse event coded to the same preferred term are counted only once in the line for that preferred ten-n.
`
`

`

`::
`
`Drug related adverse events - Cubist-sponsored Phase 1 studies
`In the Cubist sponsored Phase 1 studies, 29/240 (12.1%) of subjects who received
`daptomycin experienced at least one AE that was considered possibly or probably
`related to study treatment. Of subjects in the comparator groups, 6/109 (5.5%)
`experienced at least one adverse event that was considered possibly or probably
`related to study treatment.
`In both groups the Nervous System Disorders System
`Organ Class (SOC) were the most commonly reported AEs.
`In the daptomycin
`group, 11/240 subjects (4.6%) experienced AEs within this SOC compared with
`3/109 subject (2.8%) in the comparator group. As demonstrated in Table 12
`below, the most frequently reported drug-related ABS by preferred term were
`headache, increased CPK, and vomiting.
`
`Table 12: Drug-Related Adverse Events Occurring in 21% of Subjects by
`System Organ Class and Preferred Term, Cubist-sponsored Phase 1 Studies
`
`(Po ulation: All Sub'ects Treated
`
`
`
`
`System/Organ
`
`
`Daptomycin Comparator
`Comparator
`Daptomycin
`
`
`N=109
`N= 92
`N=121
`
`
`N M)
`N 0%)
`
`
`
`10 (8.3) Total Number of Subjects with
`
`at Least one Related AB
`
`
`Multiple Dose
`
`Single Dose
`
`3. Includes events assessed as probably or possibly related l0 study treatment. The highest relationship (probable > possible
`> unrelated) is tabulated
`
`Adverse events leading to discontinuation - Cubist-sponsored Phase 1 studies
`1n
`the Cubist-sponsored
`clinical
`pharmacology
`studies,
`seven
`subjects
`discontinued study medication due to AE’s:
`5/240 (2.1%) in the daptomycin
`group and 2/109 (1.8%) in the comparator group. Six of the seven AEs causing
`discontinuation were considered probably or possibly related to study medication.
`One subject (study DAP-OO—OZ) in the control group (placebo) was discontinued
`from the study because ofa mild rash with mild pruritus starting on Day 1; these
`events were considered to be possibly related to study medication. A second
`subject (study DAP-MDRl-01-03; dose = loading dose of4 mg/kg, then 3 mg/kg
`on days 3, 5, 7, 11, and 13) discontinued prematurely due to elevated CPK
`concentrations after five doses of daptomycin (total daptomycin dose = 1767 mg).
`Maximum serum CPK was 4498 U/L on d10 and decreased to 649 U/L by d5P.
`A third subject (study DAP-QTNC-01-06; dose of 6 mg/kg q24h for a planned 14
`days) discontinued the study on Day 9 of daptomycin treatment due to facial palsy
`considered unrelated to the study medication.
`In the same study, two daptomycin-
`treated subjects and one placebo-treated subject discontinued the study due to
`_, “v
`
`15
`
`

`

`elevated CPK. concentrations considered probably related to study drug. One of
`the daptomycin-treated subjects had a maximum serum CPK (asymptomatic) of
`'1940 U/L on dl4, which returned to normal by d25. The second daptomycin-
`treated subject had a maximum serum CPK (asymptomatic) of 1593 U/L on d7,
`which returned to normal by le. The placebo-treated subject had a maximum
`serum CPK (asymptomatic) of ll,430 U/L on d14 which returned to normal by
`d28. All CPK isoenzymes in these patients were MM. One subject (study DAP-
`00-04) discontinued study medication due to severe diarrhea after receiving a
`single dose of 346 mg (4 mg/kg) daptomycin; the diarrhea was considered to be
`probably related to study drug.
`
`Medical Officer Comment
`the Cubist-sponsored clinical
`The
`elevations
`in
`serum CPK noted in
`pharmacology trials are fairly typical of this AE due to daptomycin. Serum CPK
`elevations were noted after approximately one week of treatment and no
`symptoms were present. ‘ Resolution over several days is often seen. Of note,
`however, is that the doses at which CPK elevations were noted are consistent with
`
`those used in the pivotal phase 111 trials.
`
`Serious adverse events - Cubist—sponsored Phase 1 studies
`There were three SAEs in the Cubist-sponsored clinical pharmacology studies.
`One subject (Study DAP-QNTC-Ol-06) developed right-sided facial numbness
`and weakness after receiving daptomycin 6 mg/kg q24h for 9 days; the day of
`symptom onset was between day 9 and 14. The diagnosis was Bell's palsy, the
`patient was treated with steroids, and the symptoms improved by follow-up at 6
`months. The investigator considered the Bell's palsy to be unrelated to the study
`drug. The second subject (Study DAP—OO-O4) developed diarrhea, nausea, and
`vomiting approximately two hours after a single dose of daptomycin 4 mg/kg.
`His gastrointestinal
`symptoms resolved over
`the following 24 hours with
`symptomatic therapy, and were judged probably related to study treatment by the
`investigator. A third subject (Study DAP-OO-04) developed nausea and vomiting
`approximately two hours after
`the infusion of daptomycin 4 mg/kg. His
`symptoms
`resolved over
`the following 12 hours with no treatment;
`the
`investigator considered the SAE to be probably related to study treatment.
`
`Deaths - Cubist-sponsored Phase 1 studies
`No deaths occurred during the Cubist-sponsored clinical pharmacology studies.
`
`Lillv-sponsored Phase I studies
`Demographics
`The Lilly Phase I studies enrolled 362 subjects who received daptomycin. These
`human pharmacology studies included single- and multiple-dose safety and
`phannacokinetic studies in healthy subjects. Multiple-dose studies examined
`various doses and regimens up to 4 mg/kg q12h for 14 days. Also included are in
`viva protein binding studies; a metabolism and excretion study using radiolabeled
`
`16
`
`

`

`::
`
`daptomycin, a study in subjects with various degrees of renal impairment, and
`drug interaction studies with tobramycin and amikacin.
`
`Demographic data was unavailable for studies BSB-MC-AVAD (39 patients) and
`B8B—MC—AVAL (6 patients). Limited demographic data was available for study
`B8B-EW-0001 (12 patients) and the studies conducted in Japan (5 studies, 6
`patients each).
`In the single-dose studies conducted in the US, where the data was
`available, the mean age was 31.6 years (range 19 to 46 years), in 35 males and 12
`females. All of the subjects were Caucasian (race data was unavailable for studies
`BSB—EW-OOO] and BSB-MC-AVAL).
`In the studies conducted in Japan (B8B-
`XO-lOOl, BBB-X04002, B8B-XO-1003, B8B-XO-1004 and B8B-XO-1005),
`the mean ages of the subjects were 28.5, 28.5, 34.3, 34.3, and 30.8 years,
`respectively. Subjects in the three repeat dose studies (B8B—LC-AVAB, B8B-LC~
`AVA], B8B-MC-AVAP and BSB-LC-AVAK) had a mean age of 33.9 years (24
`to 49 years) reported in 34 males. All but three of the subjects (two blacks and
`one with the race distinction of "other") were Caucasian. Subject demographics
`of Lilly-sponsored single-dose clinical pharmacology studies are shown in Table
`13.
`
`Table 13: Summary of Subject Demographics for the Lilly—sponsored Single-dose
`Da tomvcin Phase 1 Studies
`
`tud)‘ Number
`
`BSB-LC—
`AYAA
`
`BSB—LC-
`AVAC
`
`m— =5
`
`
`
`
`BSB-LC-
`AVAF
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`BSB-LC-
`AVAJ
`
`B8B-LC— BBB MC-
`AVAK
`AVAL
`=6
`
`B8B-EVV
`000]
`
`31.7
`25-41
`
`29.0
`23 35
`
`N/A
`19-46
`
`25 5
`20 33
`
`/A
`
`“—-
`--
`
`
`3 9
`
`3 /
`
`N
`
`A
`
`N
`
`/A
`
`N/A
`
`69.0
`65-73
`
`
`
`73.0
`67-79
`
`70.0
`61 76
`
`74 3
`54-86
`
`I\=6
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`'
`
`I eight (in.)
`can
`I' ange
`Veight (kg)
`can
`I' ange
`N 'A=Not available
`
`39.5
`32-46
`
`31.2
`25-36
`
`32.7
`28-37
`
`— 5
`
`5
`O
`
`68.0
`64-72
`
`65.8
`64-68
`
`70.2
`69-72
`
`71.8
`61-88
`
`69.2
`67-72
`
`72.0
`56-87
`
`With the exception of 12 women enrolled in Studies BSB-MC-AVAL and B8B-
`EW-OOOl, all of the subjects were male and all were Caucasian; race data is
`unavailable for these 2 studies BSB-MC-AVAL and BBB-EW-OOOI. Subjects in
`these studies ranged in age from 19 to 46 years. Subject demographics of Lilly-
`sponsored repeated-dose Clinical pharmacology studies are shown in Table 14.
`
`ll
`
`17
`
`

`

`
`
`the Lilly-sponsored
`
`Table 14: Summary of Subject Demographics for
`Repeated-dose Daptomycin Phase 1 Studies
` Study .Number
`BBB-LC-AVAB
`BSB-LC-AVAI BSB-MC-AVAK BSB-MC-AVA'
`
`’ariable
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`ace
`
`
`Caucasian
`
`Black
`
`
`
`a. Ofthc 6 subjects enrolled in BBB-MC-AVAK. only 5 were dosed during the repeated dose regimen
`b. weight in pounds
`
`All subjects in the repeated-dose studies were male and the majority were
`Caucasian. The mean subject age was approximately 32 years in studies BBB—LC-
`AVAB and BSB-LC-AVAI and was slightly younger, 30 years, in study BBB-LC-
`AVAK, and slightly older, 38 years,
`in study B8B-MC-AVAP.
`Subject
`demographics of Lilly-sponsored clinical pharmacology studies conducted in
`Japan are shown in Table 15.
`
`Table 15: Summary of Subject Demographics for
`Daptomycin Phase I Studies Conducted in Japan
`
`
`Study Number
`‘BSB-XO BBB-XO-- BSB-JE
`‘
`1002
`1003
`1004
`1005
`
` ’ariable
`
`
`N'A = N0! available
`
`0001
`
`
`
`
`
`BBB-JE
`0002
`
`
`
`
`
`
`66.7
`
`
`
`the Lilly-sponsored
`
`Adverse events - Lilly-sponsored Phase I
`AEs seen in the Lilly-sponsored Phase 1 studies included headache, abdominal
`pain and pain and bruising at the venipuncture site. Daptomycin, administered
`intravenously at doses up to 6 mg/kg; was well-tolerated in the single-dose studies
`in healthy men and a small number of women. All AEs that occurred during these
`studies are summarized in Table 16.
`
`1-;
`
`l8
`
`

`

`C::::
`
`Table 16: Adverse Events in Lillv-s-onsored Da tomvcin Sinaie-dose Phase 1 Studies
`
`tud)‘ .Number
`
`'BB-LC-
`
`'B8B-LC-
`- VAC
`
`'
`
` - VAA
`
`Ilaptorfiycin
`,IO,25
`0,75 mg IV
`
`II aplomyci II aptomyci II aptomyci II aptomyci ll aptomycin II aplomyci
`I ngg IV 1 mg/kg,
`
`=' =6 lea-1mm-
`
`Number of Sub'ects
`
`%
`
`- dverse Event
`
`eastoneAE
`
`vstem disorders
`
`nemia
`
`I (0.0) M“
`1 (16.7
`Swellingoffiehleveli106.7)
`
`00.0
`
`aisorders
`
`I(0-0 Emu-MM-
`_-1 16.7
`bdominal -ain
`- Emu-m0-
`um-
`um M-
`I(0.0 mum-mm-
`-I-I(0.0) l—l-M-
`_
`
`eneral disorders an I
`
`-
`
`
`
`
`
`EE-MM-
`
`onditions
`
`-I(0.0)W
`_I(00 mam-m-
`_-I(00)
`-
`IIIOOI
`
`
`l MEN-Elm-
`
`Elm-MEIE-
`
`
`
`(
`.
`' min-mm-
`=§El 20-0 ”MI-I-m-
`
`nfestations
`
`nfection
`
`.
`
`(0.0
`(0.0
`(0.0) _1 16.7
`(0.0)
`(0.0
`II (20.0 “WW
`
`InvestieaIions
`
`I 00)
`
`-I-I(0.0)
`
`(00 num-
`
`on nective tissue and
`I(0.0
`I
`16.7
`I
`16.7
`1
`I 0.0)
`I(0.0
`I(0.0
`I
`onedisorders
`II “3—3010-2100-
`WWW—mm-
`
`'
`oisorders
`II 0.0
`
`I 0-0
`
`INI-
`_~
`“(Dom—106.7
`(0.0) n. (0.0
`_ __..,.,
`
`

`

`_1(l6.7)
`
`.
`
`
`
`
`
`,
`- A .0
`K3 1.
`a
`
`
`
`
`'
`(0.0)
`Io 0.0) __<00)
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`I
`
`—-1(16.7)
`
`issue disorders
`
`
`o 0.0 “MM-
`
`
`I_v<0.0) Im-
`a. AEs listed here may have occurred during multiple dosing with 3 mg‘kg daptomycin
`.
`
`Headache was the most frequently noted AE among subjects in the single-dose
`studies. In several cases, IV infiltration occurred resulting in inflammation or
`edema. Mild gastrointestinal disturbances were also noted. These events were not
`dose-related and did not persist.
`
`studies are
`AEs that occurred in the Lilly-sponsored repeat-dose Phase I
`summarized in Table 17 below. Note that in the Lilly study report for study BSB-
`LC-AVAK, no distinction was made between AEs which occurred during single
`versus multiple dosing. Therefore, the AEs for this study are presented with the
`single-dose studies only (see Table 16 above). One of the five subjects who
`received daptomycin 3 mg/kg q]2h in study BSB-MCAVAP had elevations in
`alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and lactate
`dehydrogenase. None of the other subjects in this dose group had any AEs
`reported. Among the subjects in the 4 mg/kg q] 2h group, 2/5 subjects experienced
`marked elevations in CPK levels with accompanying symptoms of muscle
`weakness and pain. These events led to early termination of this study. The other
`3 subjects in the 4 mg/kg group had normal CPK levels and had no symptoms of
`muscle pain or' weakness.
`.
`
`APPEARS TH!S ‘r’s'AY
`
`0N ORlGll-lAL
`
`20
`
`

`

`C:::
`
`Table 17: Adverse Events in Lilly—sponsored Daptomycin Repeated-dose
`Phase 1 Studies
`tudy Number
`
`
`
`
`mg/kg or
`
`- mg/kg q12h
`I
`'=]0
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Number of Subjects (%)
`:
`'o. ofSub'ecls with at least one AE
`
`EMM-
`
`ar nain
`ve disorders
`
`mam-mm.—
`
`
`
`
`
`éedness Iefi exe
`
`astroimestinal disorders
`
`"mm—-
`
`'
`
`- bdominal min
`Iliarrhea
`
`II 's-oesia M
`ooxhaehe M
`eneral disorders and administrationsit-—
`
`4 (40.0)
`
`4 80.0
`
`2 (20.0)
`
`onditions
`
`.—..
`
`_
`
`duscle weakness
`
`l’ain exuaciion siie
`'ain vem‘ mnemre site
`
`1 (10.0
`
`mum-
`__-_--—
`"Lewealions
`—--—-KGE-
`Alanine aminotransferase increased M
`
`aclate dehvdro- enase increased
`I\Iusculoskeletal, connective tissue and
`
`
`
`1 (10.0)
`
`0 (0.0
`0 (0.0)
`
`2 (20.0)
`
`mum-.-
`“mm—ma-
`
`'er\'ous svstem disorders Ml eadache
`
`m- 2 (400
`
`nsomnia
`
`Emman-
`
`esn’s disorder _-_-
`I' espiratory, thoracic and mediastinal
`0 (0.0)
`. isorders
`E_—--—-ME-
`M-
`
`i——_—
`’asodilation '
`
`“,
`_~.‘.
`
`21
`
`

`

`I
`
`.
`
`I
`
`Table 18 below summarizes the AEs that occurred in subjects enrolled in the
`Phase I studies conducted in Japan.
`
`tudy Number
`
`Table 18: Incidence of Adverse Events in Lilly-sponsored Daptomycin Phase 1
`Studies Conducted in Ja an
`BBB-X0
`B8B—XO‘ BSB-XO' BSB-XO
`
`
`100]
`1002
`
`
`
`h—6
`N=6
`‘
`dverse event _ Number ofSub'ects %
`_-I—
`-o.ofSubjectswith
`0(0.0)
`0(0.0)
`0(0.0)
`0(0.0)
`0(o.0)
`7(26.9)
`0(0.0)
`east oneAE
`
`BSB-XO
`1005
`l\=6
`
`888- JE BSB- JE
`0001
`0002
`N=26
`N=10
`
`'lGastrointestinal
`ldisorders
`' Stomamis
`:m-estiations
`Activatedpanial
`
`roloneed
`
`isorders
`
`0(o.0)
`
`0(0.0)
`
`0(o.0)
`
`0(0.0) "W
`-
`
`
`
`0(0.0)
`
`O(0.0)
`
`O(0.0)
`
`III-I-
`
`O(0.0)
`
`0(0.0)
`
`4(40.0)
`
`0(0.0)
`0(0.0)
`orom MIME]
`
`l cadache M
`
`ubcutaneous tissue
`isorders
`
`EL".
`
`0(0-0)
`
`o 0.0 “mu—limo]
`
`_
`Medical Oflicer Comment
`No AEs were reported in five of the seven Phase 1 studies conducted in Japan,
`consistent with the overall lower AE rate often reported from non-US sites.
`Headache was the most common AE reported, noted in 6/26 (23.1 %) subjects in
`study B8B-J5000]. 0] more concern are the 4/10 (40%) patients from study
`BSB-JEOOOZ who had prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time
`(aPTT). Prolongation in aPTT was observed in one subject on the ninth day of60
`mg daptomycin and in 3/5 subjects at 120 mg daptomycin, according to the
`original study report, although the dose given is 60 mgfor 7 days, 120 mg for 7
`das (presumably sequentially).
`
`However, the clinical significance of the prolongation in aPYT is unclear, since
`this is not an AE 0f daptomycin predicted from the preclinical trials, nor has
`prolongation in aPTT been a significant finding in subsequent clinical trials.
`In
`addition, these doses are lower than the 4 mg/kg q24h proposed for use in the
`submitted indication ofc5551.
`
`22
`
`

`

`Drug related adverse events - Lilly-sponsored Phase 1 studies
`Information on study drug causality does not appear to have been systematically
`collectedin the Lilly-sponsored Phase 1 studies, and this information is not
`contained in the study reports or 185 (either Cubist or Lilly).
`
`AE leading to discontinuation- Lilly-sponsored Phase 1 studies
`In study BSB-MC—AVAP, two subjects of five who received daptomycin were
`discontinued from the study after elevations of serum CPK. The first subject
`developed symptoms of bilateral forearm pain and stiffness after 6 of the planned
`14 days of daptomycin 4 mg/kg q12h. His maximum serum CPK was 20,812 U/L
`with isoenzyme pattern MM; his symptoms resolved by 2 months post-therapy.
`The second subject developed symptoms of bilateral forearm pain and weakness
`after 11 of the planned 14 days of daptomycin 4 mg/kg q12h. Serum CPK was
`elevated to a maximum of >10,000 U/L. Symptoms resolved and serum CPK
`returned to normal when checked at 2 weeks post-therapy.
`
`Serious adverse events - Lilly-sponsored Phase 1 studies
`In study BSB--MC-AVAD, one male subject (age unknown) with chronic renal
`failure on hemodialysis received a single dose of daptomycin 2 mg/kg. Four days
`later, he developed bloody stools and a drop in hemoglobin. The patient was
`described as
`fluid overloaded during dialysis.
`No lesion was
`found by
`sigmoidoscopy and his anemia was corrected. The investigator felt
`that
`the
`bleeding was not related to study drug.
`
`Deaths - Lilly-sponsored Phase 1 studies
`No deaths occurred during the Lilly-sponsored clinical pharmacology studies.
`
`Cubist-sponsored Phase ”/1“ studies
`Demographics
`Cubist conducted two Phase 11 studies; a third study was discontinued due to slow
`enrollment, and the data is included here for purposes of this safety review. DAP-
`BAC-9803, is an open-label, Phase 11, dose-ranging trial in patients with culture-
`confrrmed Gram-positive bacterernia or presumed bacteremia.
`The study
`compared three doses of daptomycin (4 mg/kg q24h, 6 mg/kg q24h, or 3 mg/kg
`q12h with a 6 mg/kg loading dose) with standard therapy (vancomycin 1 g every
`12 hours or nafcillin or oxacillin 4—12 g daily in equally divided doses) and
`enrollment was three:one daptomycinzcomparator. The second Phase I] study,
`DAP-RRC-9804, is an open—label, non-comparative, multicenter study utilizing
`three dose regimens of daptomycin in hospitalized patients with bacteremia (4
`mg/kg q24h, 6 mg/kg q24h, 3 mg/kg q12h following a 6 mg/kg loading dose),
`c5551 (4 mg/kg q24h), lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) (6 mg/kg q24h),
`intra—abdominal
`infections (1A1) (6 mg/kg q24h), or complicated urinary tract
`infections (UTl) (4 mg/kg q24h potentially adjusted according to MIC level)
`caused by Gram-positive pathogens that were resistant to vancomycin or whose
`infection was otherwise refractory to currently available therapy or for whom
`
`23
`
`

`

`
`
`currently available therapy was contraindicated. Study DAP-RRC-9804 was
`terminated due to slow enrollment.
`Study DAP-00-03 was an open-label,
`microbiologist-blinded, Phase II] study comparing daptomycin at a dosage of4
`mg/kg q24h with ciprofloxacin 400 mg in patients with UTls caused primarily by
`Gram-positive pathogens. The subject demographics of Cubist-sponsored clinical
`pharmacology studies are shown in Table 19.
`
`Table 19: Demographic Characteristics, Cubist-sponsored Phase “/1“ Studies
`
`(Poulation: All Patients Treated
`
`I
`haracteristic
`ll AP-BAC-9803
`II AP—
`00-03
`
`' C 9804
`
`> 1
`
`otal Other Studies
`
`
`
`
`
`—I_ll-ll-lI-ll-ll-I N=ss
`gee-rs) _W
`
`_———_—mm
`
`“Hill—W
`_————_mm
`_—_——MI
`
`"I %
`—— 6(8.1
`m—_ 46(62.2)10(29.4) H (32.4)
`_22<29.7
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`-_ 10(13.5
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`6 ( 47.)) 103 ( 57.2) 28 ( 48.3
`38 ( 52.8)
`_ 47 < 63.5)
`8 < 52.9)
`
`_--l_-
`
`
`
`
`(%
`
`
`
`aucaéian —_150(67'.6)-—133 97.I)_-l
`—18(24-3
`0(0.0)
`23
`12.8
`_-l-I-I—m l
`2.9
`0(o.0)
`
`
`
`—-l—--_ O ( 0.0)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Patients in these studies ranged in age from 18 to 91 years of age with a mean of
`57.0 years in the daptomycin-treated patients and 60.9 years in patients treated
`with comparator. Comparator patients included equal numbers of patients <65 and
`>65 years of age, while 63.9% of the daptomycin patients were <65 years of age.
`A total of 65 patients who received daptomycin and 29 patients who received
`comparator were age 65 or older; 26 daptomycin patients and 13 comparator
`patients were age 75 or older. There was a greater percentage of males treated
`with daptomycin (57.2%) than with comparator (48.3%). Caucasians accounted
`for 81.7% and 86.2% of the patients who received daptomycin and comparator,
`respectively.
`
`Disposition - Cubist-sponsored Phase ll/lll studies
`Most patients in the Cubist-sponsored Phase ll/IIl studies completed treatment as
`planned.
`In DAP-BAC-9803 and DAP-RRC-9804, 74.3% and 55.6% of patients
`completed therapy, respectively.
`In DAP-BAC-9803, the most common reason
`for premature discontinuation was "Adverse Event" in the daptomycin group
`(8/74; 10.8%).
`in DAP-RRC-9804,
`the most common reason for premature
`L. :32.
`
`24
`
`

`

`
`
`the
`discontinuation was "Adverse Event" in the daptomycin group (18.1%);
`discontinuation rate due to clinical failure was 12.5%. Patient disposition for the
`Cubist Phase 11/111 studies is given in Table 20 below.
`
`Table 20: Summary of Patient Disposition, Cubist-sponsored Phase 11/111 Studies
` Po . ulation: All Patients Treated
`
`Decision
`
`Prematurely
`Discontinued
`Thera '
`Adverse Event
`Clinical
`
`(Symptomatic)
`Failure
`Patient‘s
`
`Overall adverse events - Cubist-sponsored Phase 11/111 studies
`For Study DAP-BAC—9803, a total of 66/74 (89.2%) patients in the daptomycin
`group and 19/24 (79.2%) in the comparator group reported at least one AE during
`the study. This; high rate of AES is consistent with the critically ill status of the
`patients; the majority of events were assessed by the investigators as unrelated to
`study treatment. The most frequently reported AEs in DAP-BAC-9803 were
`nausea reported in 14/74 (18.9%) patients in the daptomycin group and
`constipation reported in 7/24 (29.2%) patients in the comparator group. Other
`AEs reported in more than 10% of patients in either study arm were diarrhea and
`nausea in the daptomycin group and nausea, agitation, cardiac failure congestive,
`insomnia, and dizziness in the comparator group. The majority ofAEs were rated
`by the investigator as mild to moderate in severity.
`
`In Study DAP-RCC~9804, AEs were most commonly reported in the SOC of
`gastrointestinal disorders.
`The most
`frequently reported AEs were nausea
`(16.7%), diarrhea (15.3%), and vomiting (15.3%). AEs by SOC were more
`common in the dialysis group.
`
`Medical Oflicer Comment
`The mostfiequently reported A55 in these two studies are consistent with the AE
`profile derived fiom the preclinical and Phase 1 studies of daptomycin.
`The
`relatively high AE rate seen in both of these studies is not surprising considering _
`the serious underlying illness ofthe patients in these two Phase 11 studies.
`..
`-~..._,
`h -_ _,
`
`25
`
`

`

`For Study DAP-00-03, there was a significantly lower incidence of AEs in the
`daptomycin group than in the comparator group. A total of4/34 (1 1.8%) patients
`in the daptomycin group and 13/34 (38.2%) in the ciprofloxacin group reported at
`least one AE during the study. There were significantly fewer patients 6/34
`(2.9%) in the daptomycin group than in the ciprofloxacin group 6/34 (17.6%) who
`reported at
`least one AB in the SOC of gastrointestinal disorders. The most
`frequently reported AE was diarrhea occun'ing in 5/34 (14.7%) patients in the
`ciprofloxacin group. Table 21 below shows AEs by SOC including events
`reported in >2% of patients in any study group in Cubist-sponsored Phase Il/llI
`studies.
`‘
`
`Table 21: Adverse Events by System Organ Class Including the Most Commonly
`Reported Events (22% of Patients in any study group), Cubist-sponsored Phase
`”/1“ Studies Po-ulation: All Patients Treated
`
`w:.. O 5V 2 =
`: N
`N=34
`
`ystem Organ Class/ Preferred Term DAP-BAC-9803
`
`II aptomycin
`II
`'-
`\Ia.
`
`omparator
`u
`NA
`'
`
`otal Number ofPatients with at Least
`
`One AE
`
`l: lood'and lymphatic system
`. isorders
`- nemia NOS
`ardiac disorders
`I: radvcardia NOS
`ardiac arrest
`
`
`crdiac failure congestive
`
`
`ardio-res irato ' arrest
`
`
`jdocarditis NOS
`ulmonarv edema NOS
`
`
`
`%
`(89.2)
`
`(13.5)
`
`A N
`
`0\
`
`AAAAPr."—.~~31:5'VV
`
`(1.4)
`(48.6)
`
`AVDLI‘ AU!A
`
`10
`
`La)
`
`\1
`
`%
`
`(8.3)
`
`
`
`A“AQA9°89N994.5wLi’s-hN333
`
`(6.9)
`
`AAA/«GA5".h'l‘J'PNNOxbow-NoeVV
`
`2'» .5
`
`-03
`
`lC
`
`II AP-RRC-
`:804
`; N
`v.. O E I 2 3
`.
`omparator
`'=34
`. '=72)
`‘- “III
`%
`n %
`“(11.8)
`E 13
`(38.2)
`“H I
`an I.
`III nu (2.9
`“I! n
`.- “n n
`.- “n n
`.- um-
`I!
`.- ““ n
`n I.“ n
`(4-2) .- (5-6 n n
`achvcardiaNOS
`
`
`
`
`l-l-mnn
`astrointestinal disorders
`“mum-nu
`- bdominal -ain NOS
`l “nun-Inn
`-
`' bdominal ain u er
`n-I “nu-Inn
`onin-ation
`um mil-nu
`I- IaUhea nos
`_nn “II-Inn“!-
`,
`'mouth
`2
`n-mnnnn
`unmannn
`n-l-nnnn
`u—munnn
`"- nil-nun“
`_—mm “manna
`I.“ (8.3 "mu-nun"
`_-Iml mill-“nun
`eneraldisorders and
`(40.5)
`(41.7)
`(36.1) - (2.9) .-
`“nun-nun
`“II-nun“
`ln‘ection sitee 'thema n (5-4) “n““nnn
`ll
`
`4 dministration site conditions
`
`2 ON
`
`

`

`.
`
`
`.nflnmmwsmakmasmmmmmmsImUmmnememm.mwkNchEaumn..mn
`.mmmm...H.IMSS.1ToUdWCw.md%amm\0amUMW&
`
`
`
`.mEAmamddm."rmmfmevmnmmmmmef.fixk.\\\.Wnnaa.€.fle.m0v<v.£n009EEEW
`hr.“.191.1n.6.1-;Ihn0m..xd6156.l03..\.dC.|a1DD“nS
`
`
`mmohmmmm.macmmawmwwmmmruammMORbmkimmammmmmmmmwmm
`
`1e2k.nsmdmsasdndOcrindanadmnarbnnamhmeawfln6Nlyed?rvWrrC
`
`6at:rw3ncaNlnnnemd0mrmimls(XOEdC2r...dd
`
`si1sniiOrt.xbcasdcasas.nNnndlonu
`
`
`
`
`nnuflflmm“9J6.mmMONW.P.pn..N.-mIMdmnm.Mdammmm3MMHmmm.m.m.“.marummgS
`
`
`.ma.hddugo.msmegeumnxmemammoedsc.mw..-axis
`
`
`
`.I.LIIPPIIIIOPs...BRIIIONA.ll...DI...u:..OPPR
`
`dvowuronr05...nCBSmuok.eewRNemNsosmmamaflea mn.061e9eraduSC.1Ba.nmo..Na.“0..h.t.mCSnd.eSSS.mam.uLawn.neOn0USast.nddxoermadSa.mcernN.h...N.moeeCNSMd)0awnanrhflfi
`
`
`
`19:0adnidntaaeamronsfivhroei.miseantn0n.ltio
`
`
`
`
`811291IIZHZIZISHISZ21N459010245
`
`
`J4.47.5474.47.74.74.J.44.7.7.4.1.4.5.7..J4.
`
`
`(((((((((((((((((((((((((((
`
`5
`
`
`
`.)\Ix)x;\II
`
`
`
`31186J1]2J3A0446”282n2412((((x(2(.((
`
`n3
`
`7.22(((
`
`.1.
`
`85
`
`89.
`
`\l)
`
`II.
`
`
`2323332M3223.“232.2.2.2.27.22.2356.362.9.
`\I\I)\Ix)\r)()4555077ml
`..........8.844co84”a“0&88M6o(o\4414(4M“(804(“(211(a
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1..L.........5....41.......258.5.625L18((6M6045UMZMZ2003USWUM442((MUM((Q(M(124(Q(aM
`
`
`
`4462682662888876.46636222586329.269.500.26.4582.4.0.36.2.
`
`27
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`—--Innnn
`
`“nun-nu
`“nu—mun
`I'Ieural effusion
`
`2
`(2.7 n“_ (4.2 mu“
`l'uesirato
`failure (excluding neonatal
`Winn-nun“
`
`ckjn & subcutaneous tissue disorders
`20 -----l-lnnn
`ermatitis NOS mum-nun“
`
`I rvthemaNEC
`"mu“ 3
`4-2 “nun
`
`Will-“nun '
`mun-[Inn
`
`
`Ile\'iceblocka-e mm- (2.8 “nun
`’asculardisorders
`16
`(21.6 m,“ l
`(2.9 --l
`
`I
`\ enension NOS MW.-
`
`-otension NOS
`_--lmlunnu
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Note: Patients reponing more than one adverse event within a system organ class (SOC) are counted only once in the total line for that
`SOC. Patients repomng more than on: adverse event coded to the same preferred term are counted only once in the line for that
`preferred term.
`
`
`
`
`
`Drug related adverse events - Cubist-sponsored Phase ll/lll studies
`Table 22 below contains a summary of drug-related AEs by SOC class which
`occurred in the Cubist-sponsored Phase 11/11] studies. The most common AB in
`the daptomycin arms by SOC for both Phase II studies was gastrointestinal
`disorders in 9/74 (12.2%) and 14/72 (19.4%) patients for studies DAP-BAC—9803
`and DAP—BAC-9804, respectively. Drug-related elevations in serum CPK were
`seen in 3/74 (4.1%) and 4/72 (5.6%) patients in studies DAP-BAC-9803 and DAP-
`BAC—9804, respectively. No drug-related AEs were reported in study DAP-00-03
`in the daptomycin group.
`
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`
`otal Number ofPatients with at Least
`
`ne Related AE -‘
`
`Table 22: Drug-Related Adverse Events Occurring in More than One Patient by
`System Organ Class and Preferred Term, Cubist—sponsored Phase 11/)“ Studies
`(P0 ulation: All Patients Treated
`System Organ Class/ Preferred Term
`
`DAP-BAC—9803
`
`DAP-RRC-
`9804
`
`DAP-OO-03
`
`Daptomycin
`ll
`\lA
`7
`'
`
`Comparator
`.- 1=24
`
`Daptomycin
`N=72
`
`'=34
`
`=34
`
`“KW-Inn“
`(37.8) (36.1) 5 (14.7)“
`nm-lmmuun
`--lm-nnunnnn
`nmmnnnnn
`Win-nun
`“nun-munuu
`I- (M) nun-“nun
`'mouth
`ll
`—--lnnnunnnn
`”mnnmnnnn
`Winn-nun“
`eneral disorders and administration
`(6.8) ---.-nn
`niection site -ain mum-“nun“
`mum-Inna
`ralcandidiasis
`.- 1-4) nmnunnnn
`‘n‘na
`'tract infection NOS
`“nun-mnunn
`"asinitis
`--lnm-nunnnn
`nvesri-ations mun-“nun
`l'lood alkaline phosphatase NOS
`(2.
`) "n“ "In" -
`-lood creatine hos hokinase increased “mu“nnnnn
`I
`iver function tests NOS abnormal
`2
`(2.7) nn-mnnnn
`- lusculoskeletal, connective tissue and
`(2.7) n“_ (4.2) “In"
`one disorders
`tuscle weakness NOS
`Il-nn-l-Innnn
`‘ervoussvstem disorders
`l- (5.4 mun-nun“
`l eadacheNOS
`.
`2
`2.7) “nun-unnu-
`insomnia NEC
`“tannin-nun“
`kin & subcutaneous tissue disorders --'“-_-_ 11.1)m
`ennatitisNOS
`I.
`“II—(2.8 nun-u
`l'ruritus NOS mum-nun“
`I‘ ash macular
`unnn— 28) “nun
`-
`obable > possible > unrelated) is
`lneludcs events assessed as probably or possibly related to study treatment. The highest relationship (p
`tabulated.
`
`
`
`
`. ite conditions
`
`'ncreased
`
`'
`
`Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation - Cubist-sponsored Phase
`11/“! studies
`
`Table 23 contains data on patients from the Cubist Phase Il/lll studies who were
`discontinued from either study due to an AB.
`
`29
`
`

`

`Table 23: Listing of Daptomyein Treated Patients with Adverse Events Leading to
`Withdrawal, Cubist-sponsored Phase “/1“ Studies (Population: All Patients
`Treated
`
`Patient lD
`
`Age
`(yrs)
`.
`
`. Sex
`-
`
`Total Duration'Adwrse Event Leading to
`Dose
`of Rx
`tudy Drug Stoppage
`mas
`(days
`
`Day" Relationship
`
`u AP-BAC-9803
`
`_—
`I.—
`latieue
`24
`6085
`Male
`Il—
`- -_l useleweaknessNOS
`ll—
`
`Male
`
` 4 Endocardlllswos
`8835 lood ressure increased “—
`Male
`- -_lll—
`_m Male IE! 2
`les-iralo
`failure
`“—
`
`3
`[Res-irate
`failure
`_u Female
`1080
`“—
`
`W“
`W“
`ll50 n_-—
`II A P-RRC-9804
`
`_-_--_II—
`—-—-_5__II—
`I—__--£—_II
`_-_-_—-_
`_-___3_II_
`
`Male
`
`2868
`
`048400002 mus—_—
`Female ——_.—u—
`Female --_n—
`- Small intestinal obstructionNOS “—
`Male
`7010
`35
`cutemyeloid leukemia
`.—
`
`0045400005
`
`048400007
`
`048400009
`
`Female
`
`825
`
`aeravated
`
`043400011
`048400013
`MEMO”
`
`Male mun—ll—
`-—Female 10
`e-sisNOS
`Male “_n—
`- ——a-_n—
`—- —_;——n
`Male _nloodereallnem-oshokmase “_-
`
`Female -_—n
`74
`‘ Day relative lo the last dose of study medication
`Note: Patient 0048400002 was dual enrolled under the patient number 0048400004
`
`1n the Cubist-sponsored Phase ll/lII studies, a total of 23 patients (21 patients in
`the daptomycin group and 2 patients in the comparator group) were discontinued
`from study treatment due to AEs.
`In study DAP-BAC-9803, ten patients were
`discontinued from study treatment due to AEs, including 8/74 (10.8%) patients in
`the daptomycin group. Discontinuations due to AEs occurred in 5/24 (20.8%)
`patients in the daptomycin 4 mg/kg q24h group, 1/26 (3.8%) patients in ,the
`daptomycin 6 mg/kg q24h group, 2/24 (8.3%) patients in the daptomycin 3 mg/kg
`q12h group, and in 2/24 (8.3%) patients i

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket