throbber
NDA No. 21-572 SN007
`
`Cubicin
`
`Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`
`Microbiology Portion of the Package Insert
`
`Page 1 of 4
`Clinical Microbiology Review
`March 7, 2006
`
`
`Changes to the Microbiology Portion of the Package Insert by this Reviewer are indicated as
`follows: added text is italicized, bolded, and underlined while deleted text is stricken
`through.
`
`MICROBIOLOGY
`Daptomycin is an antibacterial agent of a new class of antibiotics, the cyclic lipopeptides.
`Daptomycin is a natural product which has clinical utility in the treatment of infections
`caused by aerobic Gram-positive bacteria. The in vitro spectrum of activity of
`daptomycin encompasses most clinically relevant Gram-positive pathogenic bacteria.
`Daptomycin retains potency against antibiotic resistant Gram-positive bacteria including
`isolates resistant to methicillin, vancomycin, and linezolid.
`
`Daptomycin exhibits rapid, concentration-dependent bactericidal activity against Gram-
`positive organisms in vitro. This has been demonstrated both by time-kill curves and by
`MBC/MIC ratios using broth dilution methodology.
`
`In vitro studies have demonstrated additive or indifferent interactions of daptomycin with
`other antibiotics. Antagonism, as determined by kill curve studies, has not been
`observed. In vitro synergistic interactions occurred with aminoglycosides and β-lactam
`antibiotics against some isolates of staphylococci and enterococci, including some MRSA
`isolates.
`
`
`
`Mechanism of Action
`The mechanism of action of daptomycin is distinct from any other antibiotic. Daptomycin
`binds to bacterial membranes and causes a rapid depolarization of membrane potential.
`The loss of membrane potential leads to inhibition of protein, DNA, and RNA synthesis,
`which results in bacterial cell death.
`
`Resistance
`Mechanisms of Resistance:
`At this time, no mechanism of resistance to daptomycin has been identified.
`Currently, there are no known transferable elements that confer resistance to
`daptomycin.
`Cross Resistance:
`Cross-resistance has not been observed with any other class of antibiotic.
`Other:
`The emergence of resistance to daptomycin occurred in 2 of more than 1000 (<0.2%)
`infected subjects across the entire set of Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. In one case, a
`resistant S. aureus was isolated from a patient in a Phase 2 study who received
`daptomycin at less than the protocol-specified dose for the initial 5 days of therapy. In
`the second case, a resistant E. faecalis was isolated from a patient with an infected
`chronic decubitus ulcer enrolled in a salvage trial.
`
`

`

`Page 2 of 4
`Clinical Microbiology Review
`March 7, 2006
`
`
`
`
`
`NDA No. 21-572 SN007
`Cubicin
`Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`Daptomycin has been shown to be active against most isolates of the following
`microorganisms both in vitro and in clinical infections, as described in the
`INDICATIONS AND USAGE section.
`Aerobic and facultative Gram-positive microorganisms:
`Enterococcus faecalis (vancomycin-susceptible strains isolates only)
`Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant strains isolates)
`Streptococcus agalactiae
`Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp. equisimilis
`Streptococcus pyogenes
`
`The following in vitro data are available, but their clinical significance is unknown.
`Greater than 90% of the following microorganisms demonstrate an in vitro MIC less than
`or equal to the susceptible breakpoint for daptomycin versus the bacterial genus. The
`efficacy of daptomycin in treating clinical infections due to these microorganisms has not
`been established in adequate and well-controlled clinical trials.
`Aerobic and facultative Gram-positive microorganisms:
`Corynebacterium jeikeium
`Enterococcus faecalis (vancomycin-resistant strains isolates)
`Enterococcus faecium (including vancomycin-resistant strains isolates)
`Staphylococcus epidermidis (including methicillin-resistant strains isolates)
`Staphylococcus haemolyticus
`
`Susceptibility Testing Methods
`Susceptibility testing by dilution methods requires the use of daptomycin susceptibility
`powder. The testing also requires presence of physiological levels of free calcium ions
`(50 mg/L calcium chloride) in Mueller-Hinton broth medium. and a minimum of 28 mg/L
`calcium chloride in Mueller-Hinton agar medium.
`
`Dilution technique
`Quantitative methods are used to determine antimicrobial MICs. These MICs provide
`estimates of the susceptibility of bacteria to antimicrobial compounds. The MICs should
`be determined using a standardized procedure2, 3. Standardized procedures are based on a
`dilution method (broth or agar) or equivalent with standardized inoculum concentrations
`and standardized concentrations of daptomycin powder. The MIC values should be
`interpreted according to the criteria in Table 3. Agar dilution has not been validated for
`daptomycin.
`
`Diffusion technique
`Quantitative methods that require measurement of zone diameters have not been shown
`to provide reproducible estimates of the susceptibility of bacteria to daptomycin1.
`The disk diffusion method does not reliably differentiate isolates with reduced
`susceptibility to daptomycin (MIC >2 µg/mL) from susceptible isolates (MIC <
`1µg/mL). Therefore, disk diffusion testing is not recommended.
`
`

`

`NDA No. 21-572 SN007
`Cubicin
`Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`Table 3. Susceptibility Interpretive Criteria for Daptomycin
`
`
`
`
`
`Page 3 of 4
`Clinical Microbiology Review
`March 7, 2006
`
`Pathogen
`
`Staphylococcus aureus
`(methicillin-susceptible and
`methicillin-resistant)
`Streptococcus pyogenes,
`Streptococcus agalactiae, and
`Streptococcus dysgalactiae
`subsp. equisimilis
`Enterococcus faecalis
`(vancomycin-susceptible
`only)
`
`Minimal inhibitory
`concentration (µg/mL)a
`S
`I
`R
`≤1
`(b)
`(b)
`
`≤1
`
`(b)
`
`(b)
`
`≤4
`
`(b)
`
`(b)
`
`
`a. The MIC interpretive criteria for S. aureus and E. faecalis are applicable only to tests performed by
`broth microdilution using Mueller-Hinton broth adjusted to a calcium content of 50 mg/L; the MIC
`interpretive criteria for Streptococcus spp. other than S. pneumoniae are applicable only to tests
`performed by broth microdilution using Mueller-Hinton broth adjusted to a calcium content of 50
`mg/L, supplemented with 2 to 5% lysed horse blood, inoculated with a direct colony suspension and
`incubated in ambient air at 35ºC for 20 to 24 hours.
`b. The current absence of data on daptomycin resistant strains isolates precludes defining any categories
`other than “Susceptible”. Strains Isolates yielding test results suggestive of a “non-susceptible”
`category should be retested, and if the result is confirmed, the isolate should be submitted to a
`reference laboratory for further testing.
`
` A
`
` report of “Susceptible” indicates that the pathogen is likely to be inhibited if the
`antimicrobial compound in the blood reaches the concentrations usually achievable.
`
`Quality Control
`Standardized susceptibility test procedures require the use of quality control
`microorganisms to control the technical aspects of the procedures. Standard daptomycin
`powder should provide the range of values noted in Table 4. Quality control
`microorganisms are specific strains of organisms with intrinsic biological properties
`relating to resistance mechanisms and their genetic expression within bacteria; the
`specific strains used for microbiological quality control are not clinically significant.
`Agar dilution has not been validated for daptomycin.
`
`

`

`NDA No. 21-572 SN007
`Cubicin
`Cubist Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
`
`Table 4. Acceptable Quality Control Ranges for Daptomycin to Be Used in Validation of
`Susceptibility Test Results
`
`Page 4 of 4
`Clinical Microbiology Review
`March 7, 2006
`
`
`
`
`
`QC Strain
`
`Enterococcus faecalis
`ATCC 29212
`
`Staphylococcus aureus
`ATCC 29213
`
`Streptococcus pneumoniae
`ATCC 49619b
`
`Minimum Inhibitory
`Concentration Range
`(MIC in μg/mL)a
`1-8
`
`0.25-1
`
`0.06-0.5c
`
`
`
`a. Quality control ranges reflect MICs obtained when Mueller-Hinton broth is supplemented with
`calcium to a final concentration of 50 mg/L.
`b. This organism may be used for validation of susceptibility test results when testing Streptococcus
`spp. other than S. pneumoniae.
`c. This quality control range for S. pneumoniae is applicable only to tests performed by broth
`microdilution using cation adjusted Mueller-Hinton broth with 2-5% lysed horse blood inoculated
`with a direct colony suspension and incubated in ambient air at 35ºC for 20 to 24 hours.
`
`
`
`REFERENCES
`
`National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for
`antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests; approved standard-eighth edition. NCCLS
`document M2-A8, Villanova (PA). 2003 January.
`Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for dilution antimicrobial
`susceptibility test for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard-seventh
`edition. CLSI document M7-A7, Wayne (PA). 2006 January.
`Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial
`susceptibility testing; sixteenth informational supplement. CLSI document M100-
`S16, Wayne (PA). 2006 January.
`
`
`
`

`

`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
`This is a representation of an electronic record that was signed electronically and
`this page is the manifestation of the electronic signature.
`---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
` /s/
`---------------------
`Jim Vidra
`3/8/2006 10:02:43 AM
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket