throbber
Clinical Review
`
`M'wango A. Kashoki, MD, MPH
`N 2|-897
`Medisorb Naltrexone
`
`7.1.3.3 Other significant adverse events
`
`Due to the antagonist effects of naltrexone at the mu opioid receptor, there is a potential risk for
`dysphoria and other mood changes, as well as subsequent suicide in naltrexone-treated patients.
`In a placebo——controlled study in which patients with obesity were randomized to treatment with
`placebo or oral naltrexone 300 mg/day, 19% of patients in the oral naltrexone group developed
`non-serious elevations1n serum transaminases after 3— 8 weeks oftreatment, compared to 0% of
`
`placebo-treated patients.
`
`The Medisorb Naltrexone database suggested that, as a result ofthe route of administration, the
`drug may be associated with injection site reactions. Descriptions of the types of reactions were
`consistent with an inflammatory type response. The safety database also contained information
`regarding elevations in eosinophil count, a case of eosinophilic pneumonia, and reports of rash,
`urticaria, and angioedema. Together, the adverse events were suggestive of an allergic reaction
`following study treatment.
`
`Therefore the safety database was assessed for evidence of increased risk of suicide, elevated
`LFTs, and allergic reactions in Medisorb Naltrexone patients.
`In addition, the specific type and
`severity of injection site reactions were evaluated.
`
`7. 1.3. 3. 1 HEP/l TOTOXICIT)’
`
`Alkermes is ofthe opinion that the risk of hepatocellular injury from Medisorb Naltrexone is
`considerably lower than that of oral naltrexone because:
`0 Whereas the total monthly dose at which hepatotoxicity was observed with oral
`naltrexone (300 mg/day) would be 8400 mg, the total monthly dose of Medisorb
`Naltrexone is 380 mg (which is 22—fold lower than the total monthly dose of oral
`naltrexone).
`0 Administration of Medisorb Naltrexone suspension by gluteal 1M injection avoids first—
`pass hepatic metabolism
`- Medisorb Naltrexone will be dispensed1n single--dose kits and will be administered by a
`health care provider, reducing the risk of patient overdose.
`
`Upon review of the safety data, Alkermes found that in alcohol-dependent subjects treated with
`Medisorb Naltrexone suspension the hepatic safety profile was indistinguishable from that of
`placebo, with assessments ofALT, AST, GGT, and total bilirubin. Also, single——dose 1M
`administration of relatively high doses (141,269,530 and 784 mg) of Medisorb Naltrexone to
`healthy subjects did not result1n hepatotoxicity.
`
`Using the datasets iss-ae_3.xpt and iss-labs.xpt I calculated the number of patients who
`experienced a liver-related adverse event.
`I searched iss—ae_3.xpt for all terms consistent with
`hepatocellular injury, first by system organ class (gastrointestinal disorders, hepatobiliary
`disorders, and investigations), and then by specific terms including: AST, ALT, GGT, ALP,
`
`87
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Mwango A. Kashoki, MD. MPH
`N 21-897
`Medisorb Naltrexone
`
`SGPT, SGOT, LFT, liver, liver function, liver enzyme, laboratory test, aspartate, alanine,
`bilirubin, alk phos, glutamyltransferase, hepatitis, and jaundice.
`
`I then searched the iss—labs.xpt dataset using the variable “LBNAME,” under which were coded
`tests for AST (SGOT), ALT (SGPT), alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase, total
`In
`bilirubin, and total bilirubin (mg/dL). These categories were collapsed for ease of analysis.
`addition, I used the variable “LBFLAG” to identify all patients with high values for any of the
`lab tests. This subset of patients was merged with‘the subset from the iss—ae.xpt dataset for
`comparison of events between active— and placebo—treated patients.
`
`7.1.3.3.].1 Reviewer’s Analysis: Patients with Hepatic—Related Adverse Events
`
`7.1 .3.3. 1.1.1 Hepatic-related events — Studies of 4—6 month’s exposure
`
`Based on the iss-aejxpt dataset, 4.8% of all patients (52/1090) in the 4—6 month trials
`experienced adverse events suggestive of hepatocellular injury. Most patients reported more
`than one type of hepatic—related injury. Only 1 of these AEs was considered serious (Subject
`ALK21003-230-024, 190-mg, cholelithiasis) but, based on my review ofthe patient narrative,
`was not related to study treatment.
`.
`
`The frequency of hepatic—related AEs in the combined Medisorb Naltrexone subset was 4.6%
`(37/81 1). This was lower than the frequency in the placebo group (5.6% (12/124)), and was
`comparable to the frequency in the oral naltrexone group (4.6% (3/65)). The risk of hepatic—
`related AEs did not appear to increase with increasing doses of Medisorb Naltrexone: 4.8%
`(10/210) ofthe 190-mg patients, 4.5% (26/576) ofthe 380-mg patients, and 4% (1/25) ofthe
`400-mg patients.
`
`Listed in Table 7.1.3.3.1 .1 (below) are the types ofevents that were hepatic—related.
`
`Liver function test (LFT) abnormalities/increases were the most commonly occurring. Ofthe
`1090 patients with 4—6 months of drug exposure, 67 patients (6.1%) had an elevation of AST,
`ALT, GGT, bilirubin, or alkaline phosphatase. The most frequent type of LFT abnormality was
`an elevation in GGT, however more placebo patients than naltrexone patients reported this AE
`(3.7% of placebo patients vs. 1.6% of Medisorb Naltrexone and 0% of oral naltrexone patients).
`There was no evidence ofa dose response of GGT elevation among the Medisorb Naltrexone
`groups. The greater proportion of placebo patients with high GGT levels compared to Medisorb
`Naltrexone patients likely reflects a higher frequency of drinking in the placebo population than
`in the Medisorb Naltrexone patients.
`
`AST increases were the next most common LFT change, with slightly more patients in the oral
`naltrexone and combined Medisorb Naltrexone groups (~ 1.5% each) experiencing this AE than
`in the placebo group (0.9%). With respect to ALT, patients in the combined 380/400-mg
`Medisorb Naltrexone group and the oral naltrexone groups were more likely to report ALT
`increases (1 .5% and 1.2%, respectively) than placebo patients (0.9%).
`
`88
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Mwango A. Kashoki, MD, MPH
`N 21-897
`Medisorb Naltrexone
`
`Five patients were reported as having hepatitis (1 case of alcoholic hepatitis, and 3 cases of
`hepatitis C and 1 case of“hepatitis NOS. ”)6. Two cases occurred during ALKZl- 003, and the
`remaining three during ALK21-006. None of the cases was considered serious.
`1 reviewed the
`patient narratives and CRFs to evaluate for a relationship to study treatment. The narratives
`showed that patients experienced elevated LFTs either in the context of increased drinking or
`hepatitis C diagnosis. These factors make it difficult to ascertain whether Medisorb Naltrexone
`is associated with hepatitis, or whether it increases the risk of hepatitis in patients with
`predisposing factors.
`
`REVIEWER COMMENT:
`
`Overall, therefore, the data from the trials of4-6 months’ duration suggest that treatment with
`Medisorb Naltrexone is associated with a slightly increased risk of AST and ALT compared
`to placebo, however this risk is similar to that associated with oral naltrexonc therapy.
`Therefore, Medisorb Naltrexone does not appear to offer a safety advantage— with respect to
`hepatotoxicity— over oral naltrexone. The risk of hepatitis following treatment with
`Medisorb Naltrexone appears to be low.
`
`APPEARS THlS WAY
`0N ORlGlNAL
`
`6 Subject ALK2|006-247-006: alcoholic hepatitis, Subject ALK21006-255-004. hepatitis NOS; Subjects
`- ALK21003- 2l6— 005, ALK21003-216- 012, and ALK2l006- 252- 009: hepatitis C.
`
`89
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`00
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`e\aZo\=e\aZ.x.Ze\oZ¢\=Ze\oZBenzman,3ng3an
`
`ENnzmunz=<”a8:3».as2:.wecanwe:3.22:nzencour—XHZ=20gash—«Z“28:5238.35=<miniall00m
`3.0H0.2_0N.0NN0_0.00E.003.0_5.0002522350»:
`3.0N0.2H2..oN;N.00.0nmodN0:N0conga$34
`3.0N0.2.2o00.0m00.0_0:2088550.12
`
`
`3.0N0.2mg000.0w91Lmmm;C08855Hm<.
`
`
`00.0000.00N_.0_N.0_00.002.0_00.0000.0mOZmacaw:can53.0
`05mm00.0mg000.00mm;m00.008.0_N088550.00524mcosmwflmoi:
`
`
`00.0000.002.00N0_00.00E.0000.0000.0Hmagnum3:02:30:53:08.30:
`
`00.0000.003.0m|_..m0N00.00mm.0N01.0_mN.0mUEESQIIELS0:80:2558050,.umZ
`
`
`00.0000.00.nN.0NN.0_00.00E.0_00.0_E0NmOZmoiv:<usmmrrIL
`
`N.33.00.00mNNmMN.0mmNu.0N0..2.0N000053:?.53A5.
`
`0.000.00N.00..0.0000.00..Lllmv0N$00MEEREAS»..I.
`
`
`
`
` |_|253805
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`'gmlll
`
`sesame
`
`:EEEm3E
`
`08855
`
`mOZSmog
`
`38854.
`
`00322:.0835
`
`.mombmcu
`
`
`
`DMZ
`
`
`
`
`2530:van
`
`
`
`ozosoofi338%a£00820
`
`52.0w
`
`2058.0595
`
`2.233%:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`moan—um5:9:0IvI05.2:hag—.8033:mauzwmowwsmmm<"m_mbw:<mnu032>om
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`000-325:2.92.Eofimz.<$5.32
`
`
`
`ocoxobfizDEERE
`
`325m3256
`
`
`
`H.fi.H.m.m.~.hBeak.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`3
`
`:NHZ332m
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`235m_:._.mafia:
`
`252$20
`
`
`
`
`
`fix..x.,5
`
`
`
`
`
`E0_00.0000.000.0000.0000.0000.000.0£23305in32.93.,”€239“ng
`
`$20..NEE-bumNseflmE
`
`
`
`00.0000.00~50\0.0000.0000.00SW0\00.0EESNEBFC32.380050\DENSEaEmE
`
`
`00.0.000.00mN.0bmonofiquE©3333an33:83.3:
`fiz:20822:228:52=<
`menz=<8&2;2;we.3».as:338.3.5
`
`
`
`:mSwnzmNuzEmuzczuzoaSuz
`
`
`
`583%cosmfimeo
`
`mEBmE>m
`
`
`
`
`
`vanmswmmEDEOEU
`
`3:682
`
`EEEEEU
`
`3323330.3
`
`H44.
`
`
`
`findsQENH
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Avoszficoov3:555:2:0IvIi=7:523383.00:mo«Zamowmamm<mama—andwmLoBqum
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`howLNZE:.92.3232.<owcmaz
`
`0:985?Z£8622
`
`325m356
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Mwango A. Kashoki, MD, MPH
`N 21-897
`Medisorb Naltrexone _
`
`. 7.1 3.3112 Hepatic-related events — Studies of > 6-months’s duration
`The iss_ae_3.xpt dataset showed that, among the 572 patients included in this subset of studies,
`44 patients (7.9%) reported 54 A135 suggestive of hepatocellular injury, 4 ofwhich were labeled
`as “serious.” I reviewed the patient narratives and considered only 1 of the “serious” cases to be
`suggestive ofa relationship to Medisorb Naltrexone (subject ALK21003-210—004: acute
`hepatitis)7. This case has previously been discussed in Section 7.1.2.2.4 and the narrative is
`located in the Appendix.
`'
`
`The types and number of hepatic—related AEs in the “> 6-months’ exposure” categories of studies
`are listed in the table below.
`
`/
`
`Table 7.1.3.3.1.1.2: Reviewer’s Analysis: Hepatic—related AEs — studies 0f> 6 months’ duration
`
`Medisorb Valtrexone
`Oral NTX
`
`50 mg
`380—mg
`190- mg
`Adverse Event/Preferred
`
`N = 157
`N = 175
`N = 36
`Term
`System Organ class
`
`%
`%
`%
`N
`N
`5.74
`11
`6.28
`2
`5.56_l
`LLFT abnormalities — Total
`ALT increased
`1.91
`1
`0.57
`0
`0.00
`0.64
`2
`1.14
`0
`0.00
`AST increased
`
`L1_nvestigations
`
` o—mxoz
`
`
`Blood alkaline phosphatase
`NOS increased
`
`0.00
`
`l
`
`0.57
`
`0
`
`0.00
`
`
`0.00
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2.78
`1
`0.57
`1
`1.91
`3
`Blood bilirubin increased
`GGT increased
`1
`0.64
`1
`0.57
`l
`2.78
`
`Laboratory test abnormal NOS
`0
`0.00 I—1
`0.57
`0
`0.00—l
`LFTs NOS abnormal
`1
`0.64
`4
`2.29
`0
`
`
`I
`
`
`
`.
`
`l-lepatomegaly; Liver palpable
`l-lepatobiliary disorders,
`Investigations
`subcostal
`
`2.78
`Gastrointestinal disorders Abdominal pain NOS;
`10
`6.37
`10
`5.72
`l
`
`abdominal pain upper
`
`2
`
`1.28
`
`1
`
`0.57
`
`O
`
`0.0
`
`Hepatobiliary disorders
`
`0.0
`0
`0.0
`1.28 _l—0
`2
`Cholecystitis acute NOS;
`Cholelithiasis
`
` Hepatobiliary disorders
`"
`1
`I
`0.64—l
`0
`l
`0.00
`0
`0.00
`
`The table shows that LFT abnormalities were the most frequently reported AB in this category of
`studies that was suggestive of hepatocellular injury. Slightly more patients treated with
`Medisorb Naltrexone 380-mg (6.3%) reported LFT abnormalities than did patients in the 190-mg
`
`
`7 The other 3_ SAEs were not considered related to study treatment and were as follows: Subject ALK21003-230-
`018 — abdominal pain; Subject ALK21003-209—031 — Cholecystitis, elevated LFTs; Subject ALK21003-224—015 —
`abdominal pain.
`
`92
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Mwango A. Kashoki, MD, MPH
`N 21-897
`Medisorb Naltrexone
`
`group (5.7%) and the oral naltrexone group (5.6%). Patients administered Medisorb Naltrexone
`were also more likely to report abdominal pain. The sole case of hepatitis that was likely to be
`treatment related occurred in a patient in the l90—mg arm.
`
`REVIEWER COMMENTS
`
`The information regarding hepatic—related AEs that is available from the open label studies is
`consistent with the information from the blinded/controlled trials: treatment with Medisorb
`Naltrexone, particularly the higher doses, is associated with a slightly increased risk of LFT
`abnormalities. Again, however, no safety advantage ofMedisorb Naltrexone over oral
`naltrexone was demonstrated.
`
`7.1.3.3.].2 Reviewer’s Analysis: Changes in Liver Function Tests
`
`7.1.3.3.].3 LFT changes — Studies of 4—6 month’s duration
`
`This category oftrials includes Study ALK21-002 which, as has been previously noted, was a 4-
`month study in patients with alcohol dependence. The other two trials in the category (ALK21—
`003 and —006) comprise at least 6 months of data. Given the shorter exposure duration in Study -
`002, as well as the relatively few number of Medisorb Naltrexone—treated patients (n = 25), l
`excluded this study from the analysis of the change in LFT values from baseline to Week
`24/Month 6.
`
`Laboratory data were contained in the dataset issglbhzxpt. Using this dataset, I calculated the
`mean LFT values at Baseline and Week 24 (Appendix Table 10.7.a). Increases in LFT values.
`were ofinterest, as these would indicate possible hepatocellular injury.
`
`Only the patients in the oral naltrexone group showed a small increase in the mean AST at Week
`24. The mean AST value for the other treatment groups either remained relatively unchanged or
`was slightly decreased. None ofthe treatment groups showed a numerical increase in the mean
`ALT, GGT, or total bilirubin levels at Week 24.
`
`I also evaluated whether there was a significant difference in the within-group mean LFT values
`from Baseline to Week 24, and ifthere was a difference between treatment groups (active vs.
`placebo) with respect to the mean LFT values at Week 24 (Appendix Table 10.8.b). The
`Medisorb Naltrexone l90—mg group showed statistically significant (i.e. p-value < 0.05)
`decreases in mean AST, ALT, and GGT levels from baseline to Week 24. Similarly, there was a
`statistically significant decrease from baseline for the Medisorb Naltrexone 380-mg and oral
`naltrexone groups with respect to the Week 24 GGT values. There were also statistically
`significant decreases in the 380—m g and placebo groups with respect to the baseline Week 24
`bilirubin values. However, fairly wide confidence intervals were associated with these values,
`making the finding ofa low p—value less relevant.
`
`1 evaluated the between-group dgfferences (i.e. between active and placebo groups) in mean LFT
`values at Week 24 (Appendix Table 10.8.b). The 380-mg and oral naltrexone groups showed
`statistically significantly greater increases in the Week 24 mean GGT values compared to the
`
`93
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Mwango A. Kashoki. MD, MPH
`N 21-897
`Medisorb Naltrexone
`
`_ placebo group. Again, however, the confidence intervals for these differences were considerably
`wide. The 380—mg group’s mean Week 24 bilirubin value was also slightly larger than the
`placebo group (mean difference = 0.07 mg/dL) and this finding was statistically significant.
`Otherwise, the Week 24 values ofAST and ALT for either of the Medisorb Naltrexone groups,
`while greater numerically, were not statistically different from those ofthe placebo group.
`
`REVIEWER COMMENT:
`
`Although confidence intervals and p—values were calculated, it is important to note that
`the analyses do not take into account that the study was powered on the basis of the-
`primary efficacy endpoint, and not the safety analyses, or that there is an issue of
`multiplicity.
`
`Nevertheless, the data suggest that treatment with Medisorb Naltrexone only slightly
`increases mean LFT values by the end of treatment. The end—of-treatment mean LFT
`values are not much greater than those for the placebo group, suggesting no considerably
`increased risk of hepatocellular injury compared. Also, the mean LFT values suggest no
`difference in hepatic effect of Medisorb Naltrexone versus oral naltrexone.
`
`Finally, I evaluated the Applicant’s shift tables to determine whether more Medisorb Naltrexone
`patients had changes in LFT values from normal to abnormal, or from abnormal to even more
`abnormal (Appendix Tables 107.0 to 1‘). Higher proportions of patients in the Medisorb
`Naltrexone 380-mg group (14%) and the oral naltrexone group (10%) had a shift in ALT value
`from normal to the high limit of normal than did placebo patients (7%) or the 190-mg group
`(6%). Additionally, 3% of patients in the oral naltrexone group had a shift in AST from the high
`limit of normal to 3x the upper limit of normal, compared to 0% in the other groups. Otherwise,
`there no shifts from normal to abnormal in the active groups that were considerably different
`from the shifts observed in the placebo group.
`
`REVIEWER COMMENT:
`
`Overall, therefore, the laboratory data from the 4-6 month category studies show that
`treatment with naltrexone, whether oral or Medisorb naltrexone, can cause slight increases in
`transami-nases, particularly ALT. However, the increases are not considerably greater than
`those observed with placebo treatment. Also, the effects of Medisorb Naltrexone therapy are
`no better or worse than the effects of oral naltrexone therapy.
`
`7.1.3.3.].4 LFT changes — > 6 month studies
`This category of studies comprised ALK21-006, ALK21-003-EXT, and ALKZl-OIO. Since
`study ALK21—006 was ongoing at the time of data cutoff, the number of subjects overall and in
`any given group at the later time points becomes quite small. Therefore the composite data are
`subject to fluctuations due events in individual subjects.
`
`94
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Mwango A. Kashoki, MD, MPH
`N 2l-897
`Medisorb Naltrexone
`
`At the data cutoff date, the maximum duration of exposure to Medisorb Naltrexone was 30
`months: 1 patient in the 380—mg group, and 3 patients in the l90-mg group. However, Alkermes
`provided information on for the changes in LFTs for only 2 years of study treatment. For
`patients in ALK2l—003EXT and —010, “the 2 year period of observation includes the 6 months of
`exposure in ALK21-003.
`
`Alkermes evaluated the mean LFT values over time (i.e. every 4 weeks), the mean changes in
`LFT values over time, and the proportions of patients who shifted from normal to abnormal (or
`abnormal to more abnormal) over time (Applicant’s SCS, Appendix Tables 2.7.4.43 through
`2.7.4.45, P. 271-375). For subjects in ALK2l—006, baseline considered to be the last pre-dose
`test value. For subjects in ALK2l—003EXT or ALK2l—010, baseline was the initial dose in study
`ALK21—003.
`
`With respect to ALT, the median values at 24 weeks were somewhat higher in subjects in
`ALK21—003EXT or ALK21-010 who has previously been treated with placebo than in subjects
`who had been given active drug (either Medisorb Naltrexone or oral naltrexone). Abnormal
`ALT values were noted among all groups over time, but there was no shift towards a higher
`proportion of abnormal values, either any value above upper limit of normal or over 3xULN,
`with time. Thus, there did not appear to be a trend towards increasing ALT abnormalities with
`continued Medisorb Naltrexone treatment.
`
`At the end of the first 24 weeks oftreatment, mean and median GGT values were lower among
`subjects in the Medisorb Naltrexone 380-mg and oral naltrexone groups, compared with those in
`the placebo and Medisorb Naltrexone l90—mg. As was observed with the ALT values, GGT
`abnormalities were noted among all groups and at all time points, but there was no increase in
`the proportion of abnormal values over time.
`'
`
`There were no considerable increases in AST or bilirubin for any ofthe treatment groups from
`baseline to Week 100.
`
`REVIEWER COMMENT: The data from the studies of > 6 months’ exposure therefore suggest
`that prolonged treatment with Medisorb Naltrexone does not confer an increased risk of
`abnormalities in tests of liver function.
`
`7.1.3.4 Suicide
`
`Patients with a history of substance abuse, including alcohol abuse/dependence, are at risk for
`suicide, whether or not they also have a history of depression.
`In addition, as a mu opioid
`antagonist, naltrexone may cause dysphoria and other mood changes that put patients at risk for
`suicide.
`In previous studies in patients with alcohol and narcotic dependence, depression,
`suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts have been reported in those treated with oral naltrexone.
`Therefore, the NDA data were reviewed to evaluate whether treatment with Medisorb
`Naltrexone was associated with an increased risk of these events.
`
`95
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Mwango A. Kashoki, MD, MPH
`N 21-897
`Medisorb Naltrexone
`
`7. 1 . 3. 4. 1 APPLICANT ’3 EVA L UA T/0N 0F SUICIDE-REM TED E VENTS
`
`To identify potential suicide cases, Alkermes reviewed all verbatim terms that suggestive of
`suicidal behavior, suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, or completed suicide. The Applicant then
`calculated the proportion of patients in each treatment group who experienced these events, for
`both the 4—6 month studies and the > 6 month studies.
`
`Alkermes found that, among the 1090 subjects who participated in the Medisorb Naltrexone
`istudies with 4 to 6 months of exposure, 16 subjects (1.5%) experienced a suicide—related AE.
`In
`One subject committed suicide (the suicide occurred after completion of study participation).
`addition, 2 subjects attempted suicide, 1 made a suicidal gesture, and 12 (1%) reported suicidal
`ideation.
`
`In study ALK21—003, Alkermes counted 3 suicide-related events in the Medisorb Naltrexone
`group (1% of subjects), and none in the placebo 380—mg groups.
`In the first 6 months of study
`ALK21-006, of the 10 suicide-related events that occurred in the Medisorb Naltrexone 380 group
`(3% of that group), 7 occurred in subjects with alcohol dependence (3% of that group) and 3
`events occurred in subjects with opiate/mixed dependence (3% of that group). Three subjects
`(5%; 2 with alcohol dependence and 1 with opiate/mixed dependence) who received oral
`naltrexone in study ALK21—006 had suicide—related AEs.
`
`,
`
`In studies longer than 6 months, as ofthe data cutoff date, Alkermes identified a total of3
`subjects who reported suicidal ideation: 2 participants in the extension studies to ALK21—003
`(both at the 190 mg dose level), and 1 subject in ALK21-006 (380 mg group) with mixed
`opiate/alcohol dependence. There were no suicide attempts or completed suicides after 6 months
`of treatment.
`’
`
`Alkermes noted that most of the suicide—related events reported during the Medisorb Naltrexone
`clinical program occurred in the context of either depressive symptoms or further substance
`abuse (either alcohol or other drugs).
`
`7. 1. 3. 4.2 REVIEWER ’s E VALUA TION OF SUICIDE-REM TED EVENTS
`
`7.1.3.4.2.1 Suicide-Related Events — Studies of 4 t0 6 months’ exposure
`Using the iss_ae~3.xpt dataset, I attempted to identify all cases consistent with suicide
`(completed suicide, attempted suicide, or suicidal ideation).
`I selected for AEs grouped under
`the SOC terms “psychiatric disorders” and “injury, poisoning, and procedural complications.” 1
`then selected cases using the following HLGTs: injuries; injuries by physical agents; chemical
`injury, overdose and poisoning; psychiatric disorder NEC; psychiatric and behavioral symptoms
`NBC; and suicidal and self-injurious behaviors NBC.
`1 narrowed the cases further by then
`selecting for LLTs that were consistent with suicide e.g. accidental ingestion; deliberate self-
`harm; injury; intentional overdose; and overdose. Patients with an AB of “depression” were
`excluded, unless they also had a suicide-related AB.
`
`96
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Mwango A. Kashoki, MD, MPH
`N 21-897
`Medisorb Naltrexone
`
`Based on this process, 1 identified 19 patients (19/1090, 1.7%) who had 20 events suggestive of
`suicide in the studies of 4-6 months7 exposure, 8 of whom experienced serious suicide-related
`AEs (see Section 7.1.2.2.3.l).
`
`As shown in Table 7.1.3.4.2.1, suicidal ideation was the most common suicide—related AE,
`followed by suicide attempt. The proportion of patients who reported suicidal ideation and
`suicide attempt was highest in the oral naltrexone group (3.1% and 1.5%, respectively).
`In
`comparison, 1.4% of patients in the Medisorb Naltrexone 380-mg group reported suicidal
`ideation, and 0.9% reported a suicide attempt. Slightly fewer patients (1.0%) in the 190—mg
`group experienced suicidal ideation, and none reported suicide attempts. There were no patients
`in the placebo group who had either suicidal ideation or attempt.
`
`The patient narratives ofthe suicide—related events that 1 considered to possibly drug related are
`provided in the Appendix.
`
`REVIEWER COMMENT:
`
`The table suggests that patients treated with Medisorb Naltrexone 380-m g and oral
`naltrexone are at greater risk of suicidal ideation or suicidal attempts than are patients treated
`with Medisorb Naltrexone 190-mg or placebo. The data also suggest that the risk of these
`events is less for patients in the 380—mg group than for those in the oral naltrexone group.
`
`The patient narratives show that the majority of subjects had a previous history of depression,
`anxiety, or suicide attempts/thoughts and that, with the exception of 3 cases, all events
`occurred more than 30 days since the last dose of study drug. This makes a causal
`relationship between treatment with study drug and suicide-related events less likely.
`Nevertheless, given that all of the cases occurred in patients treated with naltrexone (oral or
`depot formulations), that no placebo patients reported these adverse events, and that an
`association of this AE with naltrexone has been observed in previous trials, a relationship
`between suicide—related ABS and Medisorb Naltrexone cannot be ruled out.
`
`APPEARS T1113 WAY
`0N ORlGlNAL
`
`97
`
`

`

`mo
`
`
`
`o\=
`
`
`
`
`3%.2:...mafia:
`
`.EzE—mo20
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`82:96Egan.20-0m~-000-§¥1~<“832mq:00-Nmm-000-fimv5<Sufism-m32:96:hmnmw400-wa-000-§¥4<Sufism
`
`Io
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`90o8.00Ed08.0@228“Emacasuafiofi
`
`
`
`
`
`
` ENMZ33.“?—
`
`
`
`
`
`0.0000.00mm.0N00.0688%0225
`0.0.000.00mm.0N00.0mmOZ08996
`
`0.0o#2_8.0c8.0N9.37:3383225
`
`
`0.0000.005.0H00.0$85335203-82
`0.00E;0$00.0088-388%quSm053:0me
`
`8.5%02.5.35
`
`
`2:898.332:0%.3£15mI029:;mo358..3;mad.”mi
`
`
`
`
`:onmuEE2080muoEOmmuoEmonmm
`
`
`
`
`bu=<mkuokogom"fiNéfiAEczar—L
`
`chofloaRH:Eionaoflu
`
`r
`
`
`
`
`
`80-3Z52d2.Eofifi.<$532
`
`2855:“Z£80022
`
`325m3256
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`0.0000.005.0H2:898Ecufloo<UnamEcoflom$5.0:
`
`
`
`
`
`€038:an03:689
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`.
`
`Mwango A. Kashoki. MD, MPH
`N 21-897
`Medisorb Naltrexone
`
`7.1.3.422 Suicide-Related Events — Studies 0f> 6 months’ exposure
`
`Among the patients in this category of studies, I identified 7 who reported 8 suicide—related
`events (7/572, 12%). Three of the events were serious, and included a single event of completed
`suicide (see Sections 7.1 .l and 7.l.2.2.3.l for details). Of note, two ofthe events (suicidal
`ideation and completed suicide) occurred in a patient (subject ALK21003-224-012) who
`discontinued from the 6-month study ALK21—003 and died 73 days after his last dose.
`
`The suicide-related AEs are tabulated in the table below.
`
`I found that suicidal ideation was the
`
`most commonly reported event, occurring with the greatest frequency in patients treated with
`Medisorb Naltrexone 190—mg (2% vs. 0% in the other groups). The oral naltrexone group had
`the highest proportion of suicide attempts (3%) — however this percentage was represented by
`only 1 patient out of 36.
`
`
`Table 7.1.3.422: Reviewer’s Anal sis: Suicide related events —- studies 0f> 6 months’exposure
`
`
`
`
` Suicidal ideation
`Psychiatric disorders
`
`
`Completed suicide
`
`
`
`Overdose NOS
`I
`0
`Selfmutilation
`I
`O
`
`l
`l
`
`'
`
`I 0.26 I
`I 0.26
`I
`
`l
`0
`
`I 2.78
`I_0.00
`
`
`
`
`
`Injury, poisoning and
`procedural complications
`
`I 0.00 I
`I 0.00 I
`
`The narratives of the suicide-related events that I considered to be possibly related to study
`treatment are in the Appendix.
`
`REVIEWER COMMENT:
`
`The data from the studies with longer treatment exposure show that the frequency of suicide—
`related AEs was greater for the Medisorb Naltrexone l90—mg group. However, an
`association ofthese ABS with high-dose Medisorb Naltrexone cannot be ruled out since only
`interim data for two of the long-term studies (ALK21—006 and ALK21—010) were available at
`the time of data cut-off.
`'
`
`7.1.3.5 Allergic reactions
`
`As mentioned in Section 7.1.3.3, the Medisorb Naltrexone database suggested that the drug may
`be associated with injection site reactions (ISRs) ofthe inflammatory type. Also, the safety
`database described elevations in eosinophil count, a case of eosinophilic pneumonia, and reports
`of rash, urticaria, and angioedema. Together, the adverse events were suggestive of an allergic
`reaction following study treatment.
`
`1 evaluated the frequency and. severity oflSRs, pneumonia, eosinophilia, rash, urticaria and
`angioedema to determine whether they occurred in greater frequency among Medisorb
`Naltrexone patients than placebo or oral naltrexone patients. Also of concern was whether
`together, the demonstrated the allergenic potential of Medisorb Naltrexone.
`
`99
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Mwango A. Kashoki, MD, MPH
`N 21-897
`Medisorb Naltrexone
`
`7. 1.3. 5. 1
`
`INJECTION SITE REACTIONS (ISRs)
`
`To assess injection tolerability, injection sites were inspected by study personnel at least
`monthly. Information on ISRs was collected with other physical examination observations.
`Investigators were to use their own judgment when determining whether or not lSRs were
`clinically significant. Only those reactions deemed clinically significant were considered
`adverse events and were recorded on the Adverse Event sheet of the CRF.
`
`In the NDA submission, information on lSRs was contained in two datasets: the iss—z'srxpt and
`the z'ss.ae.xpt datasets. The iss-isr.xpt dataset comprised information an all lSRs, regardless of
`whether the investigator deemed them clinically significant. The issxaexpt dataset contained
`information on only those IS‘Rs that were severe enough to be recorded on the Adverse Event
`sheet of the CRF.
`'
`
`7.1.3.5.].1 Applicant’s Analysis of ISRs — Studies of 4-6 months’ exposure
`
`The Applicant used the iss—isr.xpt dataset to describe the frequency and severity of lSRs
`following participation in clinical trials. Alkermes found that during studies ALKZl-OOZ,
`ALK21-003, and ALK21-006, a total of Medisorb Naltrexone or placebo 4844 injections were
`administered. Approximately 55% of subjects receiving either placebo or Medisorb Naltrexone
`developed at least one ISR during the course of treatment. The percentage varied from 46% in
`the 2 mL placebo group to 88% in the 400 mg Medisorb Naltrexone group. The most common
`type of ISR observed was tenderness, followed by induration and pain (Table 7.1.3.5.].1). The
`specific type of ISR that occurred most frequently in the Medisorb Naltrexone patients (190— or
`380—mg) than in the placebo patients was injection site induration (25-29% vs. 9%).
`
`Following an analysis ofthe proportion oflSRs after each monthly injection, Alkermes
`concluded that across all treatment groups, the frequency of ISRs declined over the course of
`therapy (Figure 1). Alkermes calculated that, among subjects receiving 380- or 400-mg doses of
`Medisorb naltrexone, the incidence of any ISR decreased from 36% after the first injection to
`1 1% by the end of the study/data collection period.
`
`100
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`3330mm9.2““Eamm95%2%ME
`
`
`
`
`
`AMQOINwmeamaonfimm4¢v
`
`
`
`X¢me>fiwwflmwnfiwfla
`
`
`
`
`
`wuuwflnwwunmvawawaadmwflwmumannexm‘wa”
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`wew*mevmeWQQmamagwwmawpvencwan“;wuuwflnsmVuwnaax
`
`
`
`
`
`RMENzE:.02£053“.<09332
`
`
`
`0:32stnhommcuz
`
`325m3256
`
`
`
`2:893.32553hemacawIxi5?38.35no3:32:2aura:€=8=aa<ajwés03$
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`nmawmeoUmamaflmmqmmoa-wmmqm.moolmmmammoaafimmaaMawMENmuomflnnmfiaowuumwm@uflwaowwoamcw
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`2:
`
`2%wfifimafia:
`
`EEEmo2o
`
`
`
`
`
`Ahm”mmmAmp“maRom“MamAmwmeAmwVmwnwwVmwflmm«WmAwmmemmmeauwwgwwmuwmacwwmmnaw
`
`
`
`
`
`”mmvwnmhmwUmfirmvm¢Amm.vflw.mmme_mVamhmVmmevnqmnamumugaammafiaseguomflcH
`
`
`
`Am“mmAwvmmAWHwqmflawvmmamVa““wVmAm”mmxwmmmmwmsowaowmam
`
`
`
`Mm“mmn¢wadWuvwmA¢Va”m“m“mvmAmvmqmflmoamauum“maofluommxfi
`
`Awyamnvvmm“mm“mmAw“a“wV5”mmuflusmMmmewwuwflcm
`
`baawfiw”mmWmAmyam«mflvemAmWm“AmvmAm”wAmyam“mguo
`
`
`
`“hmufiemhawywmnmwvwmmHam“mg“Awmvmmw.mmvwm“awvww“mmvwemmmmmam
`
`m:0wuummmmuwmmawwuwh:m
`
`
`
`
`
`a8.muugszskasmgmaa$3.229¢$521?528$
`
`
`
`
`
`mmauwxmuomnasmmo“MWV.02
`
`
`
`Howmm“finmomcammo”mowmmamammowmuumwnumweManasz
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`4..
`
`
`
`
`
`oEloII
`
` 9:03+
`aooémfifi9:ownI-¢-I
`68-556;weownII?I
`
`0587.-..-.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`omMm8«a.m0onaowMom....U+..
`
`
`EmcmmcmwVo
`
`o
`
`cor
`
`N2
`
`o?a?E3;5«Som
`
`oommmmmm
`
`S:v
`
`mm?
`
`KNN:
`
`ON
`
`mtwowmm
`
`m9Km:
`
`x:mm:
`
`com0mm
`
`Rvm
`
`.5852360
`
`3N
`
`oww
`
`mow
`
`Em
`
`mm
`
`”zomE
`
`“29:02
`
`uz9:8v
`
`“288;?39:0mm
`
`”2aooémxév9:8m
`
`
`
`noflnbflfificmS:333%,.5?»25:23..BE5500?:um_mbm:<mznmflaa<Qmun—WE
`
`
`
`
`
`3w;NZTEEn92.EofimM.<09832
`
`
`
`25%:sz£8622
`
`325m3255
`
`

`

`Clinical Review
`
`Mwango A. Kashoki. MD. MPH
`N 21—897
`Medisorb Naltrexone
`
`At the Division’s request, the Applicant calcu

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket