throbber
Study title: Twelve-month oral toxicity study of iloperidone in dogs (Study 0992-
`0220)
`
`'
`
`Key study findings:
`Iloperidone was administered orally to beagle dogs (4/sex/dose) at 6, l2, and 24 mg/kg/d
`for 12 months. There was no drug-related mortality. Drug-related clinical signs were
`noted at all dosages and included decreased spontaneous activity,
`tremors, bizarre
`behaviors, labored breathing, scleral infection, ptosis; slow response times and/or lack of
`pupillary reflex were revealed at neurological examination. Most of the clinical signs
`were noted in all
`treated animals and showed little dose dependence. Drug-related
`findings in the mid- and high—dose groups that were not seen in the low dose group
`included ataxia, loss of righting and toe pinch reflex (in single animals), emaciation.
`Body weight losses occurred in LD and HD groups; mean body weight decreases of 7.3%
`and 9.2% vs. control were registered over the treatment period at LD and HD,
`respectively. Hematology and clinical chemistry changes were induced at MD and HD,
`i.e., dose—dependent decreases in mean erythrocyte count and in hemoglobin and
`, hematocrit levels in males and females; lower cholesterol and triglyceride levels in the
`females throughout the dosing period, and increase in alanin aminotransferase in HD
`males. No abnormalities were found in any dose group on ECG and auditory
`examination.
`
`Drug-related gross and microscopic pathology changes were not found in LD and MD
`groups;
`in' the HD group, higher mean absolute and relative liver weights and
`hepatocellular hypertrophy resulting fiom proliferation of the endoplasmic reticulum
`were found in the males, probably secondary to liver enzyme induction .
`_
`The toxicokinetic analysis showed that mean plasma concentrations of iloperidone at
`week 49 were 5.0, 4.3, and 29.7 ng/ml for males, and BLQ, 29.7 ng/ml, and 119.8 lng/ml
`for females, at 6, 12 and 24 mg/kg/d, respectively, pointing to an over dose-proportional
`increase in plasma concentrations in the females. The principal metabolite was P89 9430,
`which was detected at higher levels than iloperidone, while P89 9124 and P88 899] were
`below the limits of quantification.
`The MTD in this study is 6 mg/kg/d in view of severe clinical signs and emaciation
`induced. at and above the next higher dose of 12 mg/kg/d.
`A NOAEL was not reached in this study as the lowest dose induced decreased body
`weight and neurological clinical signs.
`
`Study no: 0992-0220
`Volume # and page #: N.A. (electronic submission)
`Conducting laboratory and location: Drug Safety, Hoechst-Roussel Pharmaceuticals
`Inc, Somerville, NJ
`'
`Date of study initiation: June 16, 1992
`GLP compliance: Yes
`QA report: yes
`Drug, lot #, radiolabel, and % purity: Batch/Lot RC 4840, Purity 99.8%;
`Batch RC 5634, Purity>99.1 %
`
`Formulation/vehicle: gelatin capsules
`
`89
`
`

`

`Methods: Iloperidone was administered orally in gelatin capsules to male and female
`beagle dogs at 6, 12, and 24 mg/kg/d (4/sex/dose) for 12 months. A control group
`received capsules containing microcrystalline cellulose.
`Dosing:
`Species/strain: Dog/Beagle
`#/sex/group or time point (main study): 4
`Satellite groups used for toxicokinetics or recovery: TK analysis performed on all
`main study dogs; recovery not studied.
`Age: 13—36 months
`Weight:
`Doses in administered units: 6, 12, and 24 mg/kg/d ~
`Route, form, volume, and infusion rate: orally in gelatin capsules
`Observations and times:
`.
`Parameters evaluated for adverse effects included mortality, general condition and
`clinical signs, body weight, food consumption, neurological (righting reflex, placing
`reflex
`and
`pinch
`toe
`reflex),
`auditory
`and
`ophthalmoscopic
`examination,
`electrocardiography (ECG tracings of Lead II in conscious dogs from all groups recorded
`at baseline and at weeks 13, 26, and 53) , hematology, serum chemistry, urinalysis, organ
`weights, gross and microscopic pathology, and electron microscopic examination of
`livers (high dose group only). TK analysis was performed on blood samples collected
`from all dogs at 4 hours post-dose on the first day of dosing and again during the last
`month of dosing (Week 49).
`
`Results: No spontaneous mortality occurred in this study.
`Clinical signs: Drug-related clinical signs noted at all dosages included decreased
`spontaneous activity and/or crouching posture, intermittent tremors, starting during the lSt
`month of treatment, with a dose-related incidence, highest at HD, bizarre behaviors
`(sniffing, chewing, pawing, nose—jamming, circling, jumping at cage walls, jerking head
`about, aggressive barking when disturbed, stereotypy) in 2, 2 and 6 animals at LD, MD
`and HD, respectively; labored breathing (in 2, 2, and 4 animals at LD, MD and HD,
`respectively), scleral
`infection, eyelid ptosis (all dose groups), prolapsed nictitating
`membranes, and glassy eyes. Most of these signs were noted in all treated animals and
`showed little dose dependence. Drug—related findings in the mid- and high-dose groups
`that were not seen in the low dose group included ataxia and or lethargy (1 MDF, 1 HDM
`and l HDF), loss ofrighting and toe pinch reflex (in single MD and HD animals)
`Body weights: Body weight losses occurred primarily during the latter half of the
`study (weeks 28 through 39) in LD and HD groups; mean body weight decreases of 7.3%
`and 9.2% in males vs. control were registered at LD and HD, respectively (see sponsor’s
`table on the next page). Emaciation was noted after the 2nd month of dosing in 2 MD
`animals (1M, 1 F) and in 4 HD animals (3M, 1F).
`Food consumption: The relative mean food consumption (as shown in sponsor’s
`table following the body weight table) was decreased in LD (males) at weeks 4 and 29;
`and in HD (females) at weeks 0 through 6. During the rest of the study,
`the food
`consumption values were comparable to control.
`'
`
`90
`
`

`

`Mean body weights (kg)
`mmmmmcmmwwmmmas
`
`mm-mamzms INC. 31W “LOW—020
`
`'-
`
`-.
`
`-
`
`.
`
`'
`
`.
`
`.
`
`TEST
`MES: DAILY IDSE nu m
`MALES: DAILY DOSE II 16/!!!
`
`
`HEEK
`0
`6
`12
`24
`24
`6
`0
`12
`m:
`11.0
`9.2
`9.3
`9.9
`11.3
`10.9
`14.0
`10.7
`0
`10.8
`9.0
`9.0
`9.5
`10.9
`10.5
`13.7
`10.4
`1
`10.7
`8.7
`8.9
`9.1
`10.5
`10.4
`13.5 1*
`10.2
`2
`11.0
`9.0
`9.2
`9.3
`10.7
`10.6
`13.7 1'
`10.2
`3
`10.9
`8.9
`0.8
`9.0
`10.4
`10.4
`13.4 t
`9.9
`4
`10.9
`9.1
`8.8
`9.2
`10.4
`10.7
`13.1
`10.1
`5
`11.0 '
`9.1
`- 9.0
`9.2
`10.6
`10.9
`13.4
`10.1 ‘
`0
`11.1
`9.2
`. 9.1
`9.1
`4.10.7
`10.9
`13.3
`10.2
`7
`11.2
`. 9.4
`9.4
`9.4
`10.9
`11.1
`13.6
`10.5
`B
`11.4
`9.5
`9.5
`‘ 9.4
`‘ 10.9
`11.2
`13.7
`10.7
`9
`11.3
`. 9.4
`9.3
`. 9.4
`11.1
`11.2
`13.7
`10.7
`10
`11.4
`9.5
`. 9.4
`9.0
`10.9
`11.5
`- 13.4
`10.7
`11
`11.4
`9.7
`9.4
`9.3
`.. 11.0.
`11.4
`13.5
`10.0
`12 '
`11.6 ‘
`10.0
`9.0 ‘
`9.7
`_ 11.2
`11.6
`13.0
`10.0
`13
`11.6
`9.7 '
`9.4
`9.6
`11.0
`11.4
`- 13.4
`10.7
`14
`11.6
`» 9.6.
`' 9.4
`9.3
`11.0
`11.3
`13.6
`510.7
`15
`11.4
`9.5
`. 9.2
`9.7 .
`10.9
`10.9
`13.2
`10.0
`10
`11.3 '
`9.7
`9.5
`, 9.9
`11.0 .
`11.2
`.13.;
`10.0“
`17
`11.3
`~9.5
`"9.5
`9.7'
`11.0
`11.1
`' 13.0
`‘ 10.0
`18
`11.6
`9.6
`9.7
`.10.1
`11.0
`11.3
`13.6
`. 10.8
`19
`11.4
`9.0
`9.0
`10.0
`10.7
`11.2
`1.3.5
`10.9
`20
`11.4
`9.7
`9.7
`10.0
`10.0
`11.3
`13.5
`10.0
`21
`11.4
`9.7
`9.6
`9.9
`10.7 '
`11.2
`13.7
`10.9
`22
`11.6
`9.7
`9.7
`10.0
`10.9
`11.5
`13.6
`11.0
`23 '
`11.6
`10.0
`9.8
`10.0
`10.0
`11.5
`13.7
`11.0
`24
`11.6
`9.7
`9.6
`10.0
`10.0
`11.7
`13.0
`11.0
`25
`11.0
`9.8
`9.7
`10.0
`10.0
`11.5
`13.7
`11.1
`20
`11.7
`9.7
`9.0
`9.9
`10.7
`11.3
`13.0
`11.1
`91
`11.0
`9.8
`9.6
`9.8
`10.4
`11.:
`1.9.4
`10.7
`28
`11.0
`9.9
`9.9
`9.9
`10.2
`11.6
`13.6
`10.9
`29
`11.5
`9.6
`9.9
`9.8
`10.3
`11.4
`13.1
`10.7
`30
`11.6
`9.0
`10.0
`10.1
`10.6
`11.4
`13.1
`10.8
`31
`11.5
`9.7 .
`9.6
`9.7
`10.2
`11.3
`13.1
`10.8
`32
`11.4
`9.0
`9.7
`9.6
`10.4
`11.3
`13.2
`10.9
`33
`11.0
`9.7
`9.0
`9.0
`10.0
`11.0
`13.1
`10.6
`34
`11.0
`9.5
`9.3
`9.0
`10.4
`11.5
`13.2
`10.5
`35
`11.5
`9.6
`9.0
`9.6
`10.4
`11.4
`13.2
`10.3
`36
`11.6
`. 9.6
`0.9
`9.3
`10.3
`11.6
`13.5
`10.6
`37
`11.9
`9.6
`9.3
`9.4
`10.0
`11.5
`13.1
`10.5
`38
`11.8
`9.5
`9.3
`9.7
`10.0
`11.4
`13.1
`10.6
`39
`11.0
`9.5
`9.0
`9.4
`9.5
`11.5
`13.0
`10.0
`40 .
`‘ 12.0
`9.6
`9.1
`9.4
`9.7
`11.7
`13.3
`10.0
`41
`12.1
`9.3
`9.0
`9.4
`9.7
`11.7
`13.3
`10.0
`42
`12.3
`9.0
`9.0
`9.4
`9.6
`11.8
`13.1
`10.7
`43
`12.5
`9.9
`9.1
`9.3
`9.7
`12.1
`13.5
`10.7
`44
`12.3
`9.0
`9.3
`9.6
`9.6
`12.0
`13.0
`10.9
`45
`12.4
`9.6
`9.5
`9.4
`9.7
`12.1
`13.4
`10.9
`46 '
`12.3
`9.9
`9.0
`9.9
`9.6
`12.1
`13.5
`11.2
`47
`12.2
`9.0
`9.5
`9.0
`9.0
`12.1
`13.2
`10.9
`48
`12.4
`10.0
`9.6
`9.5
`10.1
`12.0
`13.4
`11.1
`49
`12.0
`10.2
`9.5
`9.5
`9.9
`12.2
`12.0
`10.6
`50
`12.0
`12.9
`10.7
`10.0
`12.4
`10.1
`9.1
`9.3
`51
`10.9
`9.9
`12.5
`10.1
`9.0
`9.6
`12.1
`13.2
`
`._ “_
`_§2
`10.7
`9.9
`_1_2.6
`10.0
`9.3
`9.6
`_11.9
`12.3-
`Il-4VALIES DRLES PEIFEANAS IDICATEIN‘MEIJDMWALDATA
`' - SIWIFICANTLY DIFFERB" FEM 000m. 0741.05)
`
`‘
`
`,
`
`,_
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`.
`
`
`
`Weight Changes (kg)
`
`
`
`WIGIT ONES
`CHEERS)
`
`MALE: DAILY DOSE Ill W
`59013: DAILY RISE 19 16/3
`
`0
`6
`12
`24
`0
`6
`12
`
`24
`
`0 - 26
`
`0 — 52
`
`0.8
`1.4
`
`—0.1
`-1.0
`
`0.7
`0.3
`
`-0.2
`-1.0
`
`0.9
`1.0
`
`0.7
`1.0
`
`0.4
`0.8
` um.
`0.3
`0.1
`
`91
`
`

`

`HEM Fl!" “"9“"!!! VRUIEI - UPTAIECSHIII" HEIEIIHIGIIAIIHAL M‘I
`WELVE-Hlll'l‘ll MAI. 1031611? 9"" IF I" 313 1' ID“
`.....--...-----....—--.-n--.n-..---~.---u--..¢~.-.---n-~.¢—.m------_-.u.-u----nw-mnnum-—u-u--—u----.--u
`9911.1 999: 19 999/99
`99199199:
`1291
`.
`9191.99:
`99119 999: 99 91:19:
`29
`29
`9:99
`9
`9
`92
`9
`9
`12
`21.9
`12.9
`9
`19.9
`19.9
`22.9 9
`29.9
`11.9
`19.9
`22.9
`92.9
`9
`29.2
`11.1
`29.1
`29.9
`19.9
`29.9
`22.9
`29.9
`1
`29.9
`99.1
`29.9
`29.1
`29.9
`29.9
`29.9
`99.9
`9
`29.9
`11.1
`29.9
`29.1
`29.9
`29.9
`21.9
`99.9
`9
`29.2
`19.1 9
`21.9
`22.9
`22.9
`29.1
`29.9
`29.9
`9
`21.1
`99.1
`29.9
`29.9
`22.9
`29.9
`22.9
`99.1
`9
`29.9
`19.9
`99.2
`29.9
`21.1
`29.2
`21.9
`22.9
`1
`29.9
`29.9
`29.9
`29.1
`29.1
`29.1
`29.9
`22.9
`9
`29.1
`21.9
`99.9
`21.9
`29.2
`29.9
`29.9
`29.1
`9
`29.9
`99.1
`29.9
`22.9
`29.9
`29.9
`22.9
`22.9
`19
`29 .1
`19.9
`29.9
`22.1
`29.9
`9 21.2
`29.9
`22.9
`19
`92.9
`99.9
`29.1
`29.9
`99.9
`29.9
`21.9
`21.9
`12
`99.9
`29.9
`21.9
`29.2
`29.2
`22.9
`22.9
`22.9
`19
`29 .9
`91.9
`29.9 9
`21.9
`22.9
`22.9
`1.21.2
`29.9
`19‘
`29.1
`- 119.9 ~
`29.9
`9 29.1
`99.2
`21.1
`22.9
`22.9
`19
`19.9
`“219.9
`.22.:
`19.9
`19.1
`19.9
`22.9
`29.9
`19
`29.9
`.- 19.2
`29.9
`29.9
`22.9
`29.9
`29.9 ‘
`29.9
`11
`29.9_
`229.1
`'29.9_
`. 29.1 '
`99.9
`21.9
`29.9- ,
`21.1
`99
`29.9
`99.1
`29.9
`29.9
`21.2
`29.9
`29.9
`29.9
`19
`29.9
`99.9
`199.1
`- 29.9
`22.9
`29.9
`, 22.9
`21.9
`29
`29.2
`99.9
`29.9
`29.9
`29.9
`22.9
`22.9
`29.9
`21
`29.1
`29.9
`29.9
`29.2
`22.9
`21.9
`29.9 _
`29.9
`22
`29.2
`421.1
`;_921,..9_~
`» 29.9
`922.9
`29.9
`29.1
`29.9
`29
`29.1
`29.1
`29.1 -
`' 29.9
`29.9
`29.2
`29.9
`22.9
`29
`22.2
`19.9
`21.9
`19.9
`29.9
`22.9
`22.2
`29.9 '
`29
`22.1 '- 99.9
`.21.:
`29.9 ' 22.9 ‘ 29.9
`29.9“
`99.9
`29
`22.9
`19.2
`_ 29.9
`22.9
`29.9
`29.9,
`29.9
`29.1 ‘
`21
`22.1
`99.9
`'29.:
`22.9
`"22.9 “ 29.2
`19.9
`22.9
`29
`29.1
`19.9
`29.9
`_.________"______.___2_9.9
`21.1
`29.2
`29.9
`29
`29.9
`19.9 9
`29.1
`2 ,
`.
`" .........--..
`29.9
`99
`29.1
`19.9
`29.9
`2:31
`3.:
`. 3.;
`:2;
`29.9
`91
`22.1
`19.9
`21.1
`22.1
`19.9
`19.9
`11.9
`91.2
`92
`22.9
`29.1
`29.2
`29.9
`29.9
`29.9
`2132
`21.9
`99
`22.1
`29.2
`29.9
`29.9
`19.9
`22.2
`99.9
`21.9
`99
`22.9
`29.9
`29.2
`29.9
`29.9
`99.9
`11.9
`29.2 9
`99
`21.9
`19.1
`29.9
`19.9
`29.9
`99.9
`99.9
`29.9
`99
`29.9
`29.9
`29.2
`29.1
`21.2
`99.9
`19.9
`19.9
`91
`29.1
`19.9
`99.9
`29.1
`29.9
`29.9
`29.9
`21.9
`99
`29.9
`19.9
`91.2
`99.1
`29.9
`21.1
`29.1
`29.9
`29-
`29.9
`91.9
`21.1
`29.9
`29.9
`22.9
`9 21.9
`29.2
`99
`29.9
`21.9
`91.9
`21.9
`29.9
`29.9
`21.9
`29.1
`91
`29.9
`22.2
`29.9
`29.9
`21.9
`99.9
`29.1
`29.2
`92
`22.1
`19.9
`29.9
`29.9
`29.9
`29.9
`29.9
`_ 99.9
`99
`_21.2
`21.9
`99.9
`21.9
`11.9
`99.9
`21.2
`99.9
`99
`29.9
`11.9
`99.9
`22.9
`29.1
`29.2
`21.9
`21.9
`99
`29.1
`29.9
`21.9
`29.9
`21.9
`99.9
`22.9
`29.2
`99
`22.9
`29.1
`99.9 9
`19.1
`29.9
`29.9
`29.9
`29.9
`91
`21.1
`99.2
`99.1
`29.9
`29.9
`29.1
`21.9
`91.2 9
`99
`21.9
`29.1
`29.9 9
`29.9
`29.1
`29.9
`29.9
`29.9
`99
`21.1
`19.9
`29.9
`29.1
`19.9
`29.2
`22.9
`29.9
`99
`22.9
`11.1
`91.9 9
`29.1
`21.1
`29.9
`21.1
`29.9
`91
`21.1
`29.9
`29.1
`29.9
`29.9
`29.9
`29.9
`21.2
`92
`19.1
`11.9
`29.9
`21.9
`21.9
`99.9
`29.9
`‘ VALUES II LEI! PEI 9299 kl “IRATE! II THE IIIIUIIIMI. DAM
`SIBIIFIBIITU NFFEIEII FRI” EDITRGL (NO-l5!
`Neurology and auditory examination: Pupillary light responses were slow or non-
`apparent in all treated males and females; this finding occurred earlier at HD (month 1 as
`compared to month 3 for LD and MD) and the frequency of occurrence was highest at the
`HD. The righting reflex was slow or absent in single animals from LD and MD groups,
`V and the placement reflex andlthe toe—pinch reflex were absent in single females from MD
`and HD groups. Auditory tests were not remarkable.
`.
`Ophthalmoscopy: On indirect ophthalmoscopy no ocular abnormalities were
`
`-
`
`.
`
`.
`
`_
`
`~
`
`_
`
`.
`
`‘
`
`.
`
`"
`
`o
`
`‘
`
`‘
`
`'
`
`-
`
`_
`
`_
`
`found.
`
`Electrocardiography: Electrocardiographic analysis of ECG tracings by a
`veterinary cardiologist did not show drug-related changes in the parameters evaluated,
`
`92
`
`

`

`i.e., average heart rate, rhythm, P-QRS wave amplitude and duration, P-R interval, Q-T
`interval, ST segment and T-wave.
`'
`.
`Hematology: Mean erythrocyte count, hemoglobin and hematocrit were decreased
`dose-dependently in both genders at MD and HD (significantly different only for
`erythrocyte count in HDM).
`
`1511 12111111111 111.1121
`
`wens-1111111 11m. 112iEi11 111111 5% 111 11a 11 11111
`
`1111111111111
`1111111
`1111111111: 11111
`1111111111111: 1111
`
`11111111111
`111111111
`
`.1
`
`1
`
`*
`
`1111111111,
`«11111111111111»
`
`1211
`11:11
`11:
`1
`11
`21
`12
`11:
`1
`11
`21
`12 .
`
`111
`1
`11
`21
`12
`
`111.11: mu m: :1 11111
`1
`1
`12
`1.11
`1.11
`1.11
`1.1:
`1.11
`1.11
`1.12
`1.11
`1.11
`1.21 _ 1.11
`1.11,
`1.11
`1.21
`1.1:
`11
`12
`51
`s1
`. 11
`.11
`51
`11
`.11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`
`21
`1.1:
`1.11
`1.11
`1.11.
`1.111,
`11
`51
`11
`11,
`12
`
`11.1
`11.1
`11.2
`11.1
`11.1
`
`11.1
`11.1
`11.1
`11.:
`11.1
`11.1
`11.1 . 11.1
`11.1
`‘11.:
`
`11.1
`11.1
`11.2
`11.1
`11.1
`
`‘
`
`,
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`.
`
`_
`
`11111111:
`
`1111.! 111: 11 11/11
`21
`1
`1
`12
`1.12 ,
`1.11
`1.12
`1.12
`1.11
`1.11
`1.21
`1.21
`1.12
`1.21
`1.11
`1.11
`1.12121 1.1; ,1."
`1.11 1.31
`1.1:
`-1.11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`12
`11
`.11
`’11
`11
`12
`12
`.11
`11
`11
`11
`12
`11
`11
`12
`12
`
`1
`
`11.1
`11.1
`11.1
`11.2
`11.1
`
`15.2
`11.1
`11.1
`11.2
`11.1
`11.1
`15.1
`11.1 11.1
`11.1
`_,11.1 “11.1,
`11.1
`11.1
`11.1
`
`1111 111111111111 111m
`121111 11111111
`
`um 111111111111 1111111111111
`1112111111111 1111 11m
`
`1111 11111111111 11111111111
`11111 11111)
`
`.
`
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`111
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`1
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`21
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`12
`22
`12
`22
`12
`12
`22
`111
`11
`u
`:11
`12
`a1
`21
`1
`21
`11
`21
`:15
`31
`as
`11
`11
`:2
`as
`a:
`as
`11
`21
`11
`11
`as
`21
`:1
`21
`52
`22
`22
`22
`21
`,2,
`.22
`11:
`22
`22
`21
`21
`22
`22
`1
`21
`21
`2:1
`21.
`21
`2:
`11
`21
`22
`2:1
`21
`21
`21
`21
`.
`21
`22
`2:1
`22
`22
`22
`12
`- -——.......--..oc—--.—-.-. w-----—-—.-.—------—.---—-~--_-—--..-...-_-—_.-_-_.._--
`'ER Hill A8 "DIEM" II "IE I‘IIHIUM. IAI’A
`=
`i : BIGIJFJIAITU IIFFEIEIT FR” “Hill. {KO-05?
`
`_
`
`1
`
`11
`11
`11
`11
`1s
`12
`:11
`:11
`as
`a1
`22
`22
`21
`21
`22
`
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`11
`12
`11
`11
`11
`22
`12
`21
`21
`21
`
`Clinical chemistry and Urinalysis:
`Drug-related differences in clinical chemistry (as shown in the sponsor’s table below)
`included cholesterol and triglyceride levels in females, that were lower than control
`values throughout the study (weeks 4, 14, 26, and 52), statistically significant at MD and
`HD. Other differences in serum chemistry included sporadically higher mean alanine
`aminotransferase values in all groups (statistically significant at MD (M and F) at week
`26 and at HD (M) at week 52) and lower alkaline phosphatase values in LD and HD
`males at week 14. These differences were variable, not dose-related and did not have
`histological correlates. Iron values were moderately increased in LDM and HDF at week
`52; no dose-related trends were seen.
`There were no drug-related findings in the urinalysis data.
`
`93
`
`

`

`-----_-----_-..------------.-...---...--------cam-nu.--wu-~u-----.o-u-u------- -u-n-o...__..--.-~»ome
`HEM"Sill”! CBEfiIET“ \MUIEB
`
`um: mu m: u um
`mum-um
`my
`um“: mu m: n nun
`mm)
`was:
`a
`b
`1:
`o
`s
`12
`
`-
`
`24
`
`u
`
`"mama.
`mnemxrm
`
`m
`I
`u
`26
`a:
`
`.
`
`m m m u:
`m m m m
`' m m m 12:
`m m m m
`m m 113
`no
`
`mmzmm
`(ISIIEIflflEN
`
`n:
`a
`1!
`2b
`a:
`null: mnmmmm m
`uwmm
`s
`u
`2;
`s:
`
`uwum)
`1
`mum: minimums: n:
`1»
`25
`52
`
`mum momma:
`uo/Lm'u
`
`‘
`
`-
`
`1m
`mun-m:
`Immm
`
`'
`
`,
`
`‘
`
`m
`I
`u
`u
`51
`m
`I
`u
`u
`:2
`
`2|
`u
`:5
`:3
`s!
`u
`12
`n
`12
`s:
`l1
`I!
`as
`:1
`is
`as
`:1
`n
`:2
`n
`u
`51
`to
`u
`12 m an
`u
`as
`n
`so
`u
`u m an , m
`u
`as
`.us
`‘m r
`
`an
`u
`u
`:5
`u
`
`~a|
`n ‘ u
`u
`u
`in
`u
`.u
`a!
`31 m 29
`'25
`:9
`u
`
`a:
`u
`u
`as
`2|
`130
`u-
`a!
`an:
`45
`m.
`s:
`a:
`u
`to
`I!
`as
`I!
`u
`as
`m m m m
`m m an m
`an m m 2::
`' m m m m
`m m m m
`
`,
`
`.
`
`I mm at Less 9:: am as mum: m m mamas: um
`I ; munmm DIFFEIEIT FRI"! nonm- "(0.05)
`
`m m 115 m
`m m m m
`an m m m
`m m m m
`m m nu ma
`
`u
`a:
`u
`u
`u
`a!
`u
`n
`u m t1-
`n
`n
`s:
`I!
`n
`m :1 m an
`so
`u
`s:
`as:
`n
`65
`51
`21
`u
`n
`as:
`u
`u n'
`12- _ a,
`u m _ mu
`.1:
`
`31
`29
`a:
`an
`u
`
`~91
`2:
`21
`2:
`2: .
`
`to a
`in
`n
`so
`u
`u
`I!
`so
`2:
`
`29
`u
`as
`32
`2: a
`--34
`:1
`21 ,
`51
`u
`32
`37
`I2
`as
`a:
`5!
`9:
`as
`an
`m as m m
`m «I m m
`m an m m
`m an m 3:9
`to:
`:m m m
`
`Organ weights: No statistically significant differences in mean organ weights
`were registered. Higher mean absolute and relative liver weights were seen in HD males.
`HE“ "0M ”Ell“! “TA
`Week 53 Necropsy
`
`mm- mu m: 1- mm:
`s
`
`n
`
`24
`
`rum“: um I
`0
`
`r in mm
`
`
`
`ma
`mun
`mm
`
`
`
`run-m
`mum!
`
`.
`
`nun
`umzs man man
`was.
`mm
`mm
`was
`"5.950 m.m
`mm ".02:
`mm
`mm
`“.12: -
`12.1“
`1i-12!
`15-!!!
`70.1..
`7IJI.
`mm
`um:
`mm
`mm
`1.31:
`1.3::
`2.2::
`1.211
`9.935
`um
`ms:
`nu .
`mun
`mm
`mm
`0.05:
`
`man
`55.5»
`«.52:
`1.5.:
`11-20.
`11.0»
`1.5.2
`0.129
`mm
`
`"mu mm:
`«2.350
`4M1:
`mm
`mm
`11.91: mm mm
`mu
`mm
`1.251
`.11.."
`.‘o’.’
`12. .2!
`mu
`9.12:
`hi“
`mu
`1.“:
`M»
`0.120
`mm
`0.11:
`mm
`mm
`0.05:
`
`um
`
`am:
`
`um
`
`mum m1 mm cm;
`ommm in. mm com)
`mm
`mu-
`2.355
`um
`mm
`0.55:
`9.3»
`mm:
`0.110
`mm
`nu
`mm
`0.1"
`0.51;
`0.“:
`mm
`mm
`0.122
`mm
`mm
`0.111
`mm
`0.1“
`vmma
`0.91:
`0.049
`mm
`nus-nu
`mo-
`0.001
`mm
`“um:
`mm
`mm
`mu
`rmmn
`I = s VILIII Ill LES: PEI um AI llltu‘l‘n II "It "3:?"th IA"
`.- Iva-Inn" lynx-nan nu :unm "(L-.1!
`
`-
`
`um
`
`3.161
`mm
`mm
`mm
`0.124.
`man
`mm
`mm
`mm
`
`my:
`
`3.”:
`9.“:
`0.“:
`0.5"
`cm:
`mu
`0.0::
`mm
`mm
`
`man
`
`mm
`was
`0.19:
`0.1::
`0.0::
`mm
`0.":
`9.097
`mm
`
`ms
`
`3.5-:
`0.52:
`mm
`9.1”
`0.912
`mm
`mm
`0.009
`mm
`
`nu
`
`3.2m
`mm
`mm
`mm
`mm
`0.019
`mm
`mm
`0.902
`
`94
`
`

`

`nomhpemflnnflnflmhDlfliflflflmmaflufldhdufluwmnl$nwnhmwm.uflflthhsu
`
`MWMMMMJanengflmmm
`
`«mmhmomyummmhunhaxmuumnandcupbdhmxsumflammsnmnummmuygmmx
`
`Pathomorphological examination: All specified organs and tissues from the
`control and HD groups were stained with H&E and examined microscopically. These
`tissues included:
`WM.W-WWW«WWMWM.WM
`
`
`mwmmngmwmmmmcmph
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`- m “hoflbnuwmbmuflmhlflfluwnwfln5 N
`
`The microscopic examination of H&E stained tissues of LD and MD groups was limited
`to the liver, heart, adrenal glands, bone marrow, and tissues with gross lesions. In
`addition, liver, kidney and spleen sections stained with the periodic acid—Schiff (PAS)
`technique, and liver sections stained with oil-red-O (0R0) were processed and examined
`from all animals in all groups. Electron microscopic evaluation was performed on liver
`samples from the control and HD groups.
`Gross pathology: Compound-related gross alterations were not observed.
`Histopathology: “Minimal to mild” enlargement of hepatocytes was foundin all
`HD males, but the special staining did not demonstrate an increase in neutral fat or
`glycogen. These findings were “consistent with hepatocellular hypertrophy induced1n
`HD males presumably resulting from a proliferation of cellular organelles,
`i.e.,
`the
`endoplasmic reticulum”. This was confirmed by the ultrastructural examination of liver
`which indicated moderate to marked proliferation of the smooth endoplasmic reticulum
`in HD males. The amount of the smooth endoplasmic reticulum in hepatocytes of HD
`males was increased 2-fold vs. controls, and “in many regions it appeared to supplant
`other cellular organelles”. No such changes were observed in the HD females. The
`hepatocellular hypertrophy and smooth endoplasmic reticular proliferation may be an
`indication of metabolic enzyme induction1n the HD males. No neoplastic lesions were
`found.
`
`Toxicokinetics:
`PLASIAA CONCENTRATIONS OF HP 873 AND "’3 METABOLI’I'ES
`
`
`
`fifioogfioc
`
`it 0
`8
`12
`3‘
`
`Wool: 49
`
`.
`13.5 i: 16.0
`
`
`
`Bu:
`10.3 a: 16.7
`g
`31.0
`2
`2‘
`3.86
`310.7 :1: 821.2
`31.0
`250.3 * 459.3
`imammmmmm-ou4mmnmmm4sm
`bwmm-mmummmnpmmsmmmm1mu
`mmmmmm
`°Amoootmmmanporbdazmaanmm Mahayana-main
`”DuvdnngnufizmmmmuumuwhquImn
`
`31.0
`BLQ
`31.0
`
`Btu
`BLQ
`g?
`
`BLO
`
`BLQ
`
`BLQ
`am
`119.3 : 100.2
`29.7 :2: 48,9
`
`95
`
`

`

`The TK analysis showed that the mean plasma concentrations of iloperidone at week 49
`were 5.0, 4.3, and 29.7 ng/ml for males, and BLQ, 29.7 ng/ml, and 119.8 ng/ml for
`females, at 6, 12 and 24 mg/kg/d, respectively. Plasma concentrations in the females
`increased over dose-proportionally. The principal metabolite was P89 9430, which was
`detected at higher levels than iloperidone, while P89 9124 and P88 8991 were generally
`below the limits of quantification.
`Conclusion: The MTD in this study is 6 mg/kg/d in view of the severe clinical signs
`(ataxia, emaciation) at the next higher dose of 12 mg/kg/d. NOAEL was not reached as
`the lowest dose induced decreased body weight and neurological clinical signs.
`
`Summary of individual study findings: A summary of the findings ofthis study is
`presented the ,fOIIQWing sponsorfs table. .
`_
`.
`Repeat-dose toxicity (12-month oral study in dogs) (pivotal study)
`
`.
`,.'
`-.>,'.
`1‘
`mmnWfil’t-zlnl
`
`mr"
`am '
`m '
`i
`:
`nu:
`an)
`-'
`
`' ———-—--—
`NOW-'5'iw’"
`'
`Murmur“ ________
`mmwamchmwwm
`03
`03
`(In)
`Met-Food (ta-amps“ Week 51
`(gm/aim! day)
`
`19.7
`
`17.0
`
`
`
`335
`
`27.2
`
`Nmbmhgmmwuawmmmmhymfla
`Mm.mmm.mmmmmjmmorm
`mkpedmfihfigmwymebnguhwofm
`Nooduabnmlifiuasm’amdwifiahinishfimofflom
`NoECGabmntiuofWulfipfifie-uum
`flmttntnhdvehcmolu —
`Week“)
`( or Maximo
`Sena
`W‘Wgfiifil
`l'
`um(mtnhunnmmdn
`i3
`mwrmnnodywmu
`Wu?
`M athl-S)Necropsy
`WatWeek-flflmm
`
`i5
`
`gE_l 5i
`
`PmdnuEnl-aflnNo. Evaluated:
`
`-- No findings ofnote.
`* Significantly different from control (P < 0.05 by Dunnett’s 2-sided multiple comparisons test).
`a No statistically significant differences from control in mean individual organ weights.
`ND = not done; RBC = red blood cell count; Hct = hematocrit; AST = aspartate aminotransferase.
`
`96
`
`

`

`Repeat-dose studies conducted with iloperidone metabolite P95
`Summa_ry: The repeat oral dose toxicity of iloperidone metabolite P95 was evaluated in 4
`studies: a 4-week study in mice (Study 0170087), a 13-week study with 4-week recovery
`(Study 007008) in Wistar rats, a 13-week dose range-finding study in Sprague-Dawley
`(CD) rats, and a 26-week study with 4-week recovery stUdy in Wistar rats (Study
`017013). The design and noteworthy findings of these studies are summarized in the
`sponsor’s table below. Among these studies, the pivotal one is the 26-week study in rats.
`Summary of P95 repeat-dose toxicity studies
`
`:: allFat'lSO, allMat750—>500 '
`6Maé250; 5113050.
`
`smumgmlag
`openinghuutnfig¢bodywt
`mvivingMnlimTutFat
`125.
`Pafiwlogszaaoecapic
`discnlmfimoflddnqr, live;
`mamdwgiui
`mymssmniameopic
`chmguinkidnzy, Unit,
`mm, femaluqnodnflmehau.
`Iabmamyfindingsaianlyn
`750): TBUN, am
`minim,,nd/m'AST;
`Kimmie: exposedtoPQS;
`
`Wthedosn—
`
`97
`
`

`

`Summary of P95 repeat-dose toxicity studies (continued)
`
`Mortalilyz2min,3TKM;3
`
`mmSTKFatSOO.
`Clinicalsigixl’tusigJ.
`
`Wufivity,mddmed
`mfbodyth.
`Deceduis: Tblooddumlstzy
`
`
`
`26weeks
`withd-
`wed:
`
`Oto 500
`
`MTD
`4500
`
`017013
`
`MIGS
`Wists:
`Ran
`
`M,F
`40
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Drugqua'uadmméignm
`
`bothdosaflosigmusdc
`flaccidity, llooomototactivity,
`mluedaual mflvagiual
`opening/inland scrotum; t
`WWwMTbodym
`foodcousimiptimF.
`Pathology: lucrmdwuglitm
`MMRPMWM).
`liver (F), heart (F), l wtmmis;
`microscopicfiudingsiuadtmal,
`pflnim?my
`odlprolifiemfionin
`mammaryMF) pmmsCM,
`D, pituitary (M) with BrdU.
`
`
`TKHSaposmon-
`
`
`proportionally with dose; no-
`sex-related differences;
`
`expom 1‘ overtime.
`ALT = alanine aminotransferase; AST = aspartate aminotransferase; BUN= blood urea nitrogen,
`
`
`
`
`infamlswale—to 31-fold
`grammaninmulu.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`98
`
`

`

`The predominant clinical signs associated with P95 were similar to those seen with
`iloperidone, and included ptosis, relaxed scrotum, relaxed vaginal opening, and decreased
`spontaneous motor activity. An MTD of P95 in the 26-Week study in Wistar rats was not
`reached in females; in males it was less than 500 mg/kg/d (due to body weight loss and
`mortality at 500 mg/kg/d). A NOAEL was not reached, as morphological changes in both
`genders were induced at the lowest P95 dose tested. The target tissue effects were in the
`mammary gland, uterus/vagina, adrenals, and thyroid; some of these effects were likely
`_ to be pharmacologically mediated. Drug-related histopathology changes, demonstrable by
`routine histology and/or immunohistochemical method (BrdU labeling), were induced in
`endocrine glands (pituitary and adrenals in males, thyroid in females, and pancreas in
`both genders), mammary gland (both genders) and reproductive organs (ovary, uterus,
`testes, prostate). Most of these histopathology deviations (with. the exception of the
`pancreatic, adrenal, and testicular pathology) were induced dose-dependently at both '
`tested dose levels of P95, eor're'sponding at LD to plasma exposure (AUG 0-24)
`"
`- approximately 2 to 3x the human exposure at MRI-1D of 12 mg twice dailygIn ‘the"2-6-'
`week P95 study, histOlog'iCal' evidence of hyperplasia'and/or pro1iferation as assessed by '
`BrdU labeling-was found in 5 tissues: mammary gland, pituitary, endocrine pancreas,-
`thyroid,vand ovary. As BrdU'labeling was not performed in any of iloperidone repeat-
`dose toxicity studies, no comparisonof these findings can .be made to iloperidone, The
`morhologic pathology findings for iloperidone (by routine histology) were limited to -
`mammary gland epithelial vacuolization in both genders at all dose levels with dose-
`related incidence and
`severity, dose—related reduced size of testicles and testicular
`degeneration/atrophy (in single animals) and higher incidence of prostate inflammation at
`HD.
`
`.4
`
`,
`
`An additional 13-week study was performed in Sprague-Dawley (CD) rats to assess strain
`differences in preparation for a carcinogenicity study, as all of the general toxicity studies
`in rats with the parent iloperidone were conducted with Sprague-Dawley rats. In this
`study, at all doses, effects on potential pharmacological
`targets (mammary gland,
`reproductive organs, adrenal) were similar to those seen with Wistar rats. However, at the
`top dose of 500 mg/kg/d, mortalities and toxic effects on the biliary system (biliary
`obstruction)
`and the kidney (tubular degeneration) with
`secondary systemic
`mineralization due to electrolyte imbalances were seen. The overall pathogenesis was
`Compatible with incompetent metabolism and excretion of P95 by the hepatobiliary
`system with development of local toxicity, increased renal excretion with toxic effects on
`tubules and other renal components, and systemic deposition of mineral secondary to
`electrolyte imbalances. Sprague—Dawley rats appeared to be more susceptible to these
`effects than Wistar rats, as the exposures achieved in Sprague—Dawley rats at comparable '
`doses were lower, yet associated with a significant increase in toxicity.
`The pivotal 26-week study in Wistar rats was previously reviewed by this reviewer under '
`IND 36827, SN 207 of 8/23/2002, review dated 07/14/2007. Relevant parts of the review
`are reproduced on the next pages.
`
`99
`
`

`

`Study title: Iloperidone metabolite P95 12113 26-week oral (gavage) toxicity study in
`rats with a 4-week recovery period
`for 6 months to
`Key study findings: Administration of iloperidone metabolite P95
`Wistar rats at oral (gavage) doses of 50 and 500 mg/kg/day (yielding P95 plasma exposures of
`about 2 to 3x and 150 to 400x, respectively, the human P95AUC at iloperidone MRHD of 24
`mgd), induced dose-dependent clinical signs at both dose levels throughout the entire treatment
`period, indicative of CNS depression and relaxation (ptosis, decreased motor activity, relaxation
`of the scrotum, anus, vaginal opening) that are attributable to exaggerated pharmacological effect.
`At HD, there was one possibly treatment-related death (1 HDM) on day 123 (the cause of death
`could not be determined). Body weight and weight gain decrease (not due to reduced food
`intake) was induced at HD in males only (by 1 1% and 26%, respectively vs. control by the end of
`treatment); the decrease was not compensated during the recovery period. There were no drug—
`related abnormal findings in hematology, clinical chemistry (including prolactin plasma levels),
`or urine analysis. Drug-related histopathology changes, demonstrable by routine histology and/or
`immunohistochemical method (BrdU labeling) were induced in endocrine glands (pituitary and
`adrenals in males, thyroid in females, and pancreas in both genders), mammary gland (both
`genders) and reproductive organs (ovary, uterus, testes, prostate). In females, dose—dependent
`cycle prolongation occurred at both LD and HD, consistent with the finding of vaginal epithelium
`mucification and decreased uterine weight in the treated grOUps. In the ovaries, a dose-related
`interstitial cell hyperplasia was observed at LD and HD that was likely‘associated with. the
`reduced estrus cycle activity. After the recovery period the prolongation of estrus cycle did not
`fully normalize, and increased corpora lutea were observed in the ovaries of HDF, concordant
`with increased ovarian weight. In the thyroid, diffuse follicular hyperplasia was induced in both
`LDF and HDF; this finding did not normalize after the recovery period. In males, pituitary
`changes were induced at both tested doses, while adrenal, testicular and secondary sex organ
`pathology was seen at l-ID only. Pituitary histopathology (decreased eosinophilia of the acidophil'
`cells of the distal part of the pituitary) was noted in both LDM and HDM with a dose-related
`incidence. These morphological findings were supported by an increase in the cell proliferation
`index in male pituitary at all time points, consistent with the increased pituitary weight. Adrenal
`morphological changes as well as testicular and secondary sex organ pathology occurred in HD
`males only. In the adrenals, an increased incidence of diffuse cortical hypertrophy and reduced
`cortical cytoplasmic vacuolation was seen in HDM;
`this finding was concordant with the
`increased absolute and relative adrenal weight and was reversible after the recovery period.
`Atrophy of testicular seminiferous tubule epithelium (in 2 animals) and an increased incidence of
`mixed cell inflammation of prostate gland with associated degenerative changes were found at
`I-ID. Prostate changes were reversible after the recovery period.
`In both genders, increased
`cellular proliferation in the mammary gland (alveolar hyperplasia,
`increased secretion and
`dilatation of mammary ducts) occurred with dose-related severity at LD and HD during treatment
`and even after recovery period. Statistically significant,
`treatment-related increase in cell
`proliferation (increased proportion of cells in S phase of the cell cycle, as assessed by BrdU
`labeling) was found in pituitary (LDM and HDM), mammary gland (duct and alveoli) in both
`genders (LDM, HDM, HDF), and the endocrine pancreas in both genders (HDM, HDF). Most of
`these histopathology deviations (with the exception of the adrenal, testicular and secondary sex
`organ pathology in males) were induced in a dose-dependent manner at both tested dose levels,
`corresponding at LD to plasma exposure (AUC 0—24) approximately 2 to 3x the human exposure
`at MRHD of 12 mg twice daily.
`An NOAEL was not reached in either male or female rats in View of the presence of
`pathomorphological changes in multiple organs/tissues at the lowest tested dose of 50 mg/kg/day.
`The MTD was <500 mg/kg/day for males in View of mortality and body weight decrease at 500
`mg/kg/day; for females, an MTD was not reached.
`
`100
`
`

`

`Study no: 017013
`Conducting laboratory and location: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East
`Hanover, NJ
`‘ Date of study initiation: Feb 16, 2001
`GLP compliance: Yes; QA report: yes
`Drug, lot #, radiolabel, and % purity: Iloperidone metabolite P95 12113, batch
`#011983, purity 99.8%
`Formulation/vehicle: 0.5% carboxymethylcellulose
`
`Methods (unique aspects): Immunohistochemical staining for assessment of cell
`proliferation in selected tissues (endocrine pancreas, liver, pituitary, and
`mammary gland)
`Dosing:
`Species/strain: IGS Wistar Hannover rats
`#/sex/group or time point (main study): 40
`Satellite groups used for toxicokinetics or recovery: 10 sex/group
`Age: 9 weeks
`Weight: Males: 247-304 g; Females: 171-201 g.
`Doses in administered units: 0, 50 and 500 mg/kg/day
`Route, form, volume, and infusion rate: oral gavage, suspension in 0.5% carboxy-
`methylcellulose, dosing volume '5 ml/kg
`The dose selection was based upon the results of a 13-week oral (gavage) toxicity study
`in rats with a 4-week recovery period (study 007008) that employed P95 12113 doses of
`50, 200 and 500 mg/kg/day. In the 13-week study, P95 12113 produced “microscopic
`alterations in the mammary gland consistent with induction of secretion in both sexes” at
`doses 2200 mg/kg/day, as well as adrenal cortical hyperthrophy and increase in plasma
`prolactin in males at 500 mg/kg/day (prolactin increase and microscopic changes were
`reversible).
`Observations and times:
`
`- Mortality and clinical signs (twice daily)
`- Body weight and food consumption (weekly during dosing wks 1- 14 and recovery; every 2 wks
`during dosing weeks 16-26)
`- Ophthalmology (pre—test: all groups; Wk 12 and 24: HD and control animals)
`- Clinical chemistry — routi

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket