throbber

`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`
`
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`022549Orig1s000
`
`
`
`OTHER REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`NDA/BLA #
`
`~ 022549
`
`Product Name:
`
`
`Adasuve (loxapine) inhalation powder
`
`1 891 -1
`
`PMR/PMC Description: A deferred pediatric study under PREA for the acute treatment of
`agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder in pediatric
`patients ages 10 to 17 years.
`
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones: Final Protocol Submission:
`
`5/1/2013
`
`7/1 8/2013
`Study/Trial Completion:
`1/18/2014
`Final Report Submission:
`Other: NA
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a
`pre—approval requirement. Check type below and describe.
`
`[:1 Unmet need
`|:I Life-threatening condition
`El Long-term data needed
`IE Only feasible to conduct post-approval
`[:1 Prior clinical experience indicates safety
`|:I Small subpopulation affected
`E] Theoretical concern
`[:1 Other
`
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is
`a FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post—approval, describe the “new
`safety information.”
`
`
`We are deferring submission of the pediatric study for ages 10 to 17 years for this
`application because this product is ready for approval for use in adults and the pediatric
`
`studies have not been completed.
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 12/21/2012
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3240292
`Reference ID: 3240292
`
`

`

`3.
`
`If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`Ifnot a PMR, skip to 4.
`
`— Which regulation?
`
`El Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
`El Animal Efficacy Rule
`[Z Pediatric Research Equity Act
`I:I FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`
`—
`
`—
`
`If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
`. I:| Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
`El Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
`I:I Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious
`risk?
`
`If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
`
`El Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: such an analysis will not be sufficient to
`assess or identify a serious risk
`
`I:I Analysis using pharmacovigilanc_e_system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if. the new pharmacovigilance system that the
`FDA is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus
`not sufficient to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not
`sufficient to assess or identify a serious risk
`
`E] Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in humans that are not clinical trials as
`defined below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory
`experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if: a study will not be sufficient to identify or assess a
`serious risk
`
`|:I Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines
`the method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human
`subj ects?
`
`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the
`study or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`
`A study to obtain pharmacokinetic data and provide information pertinent to dosing of
`
`ADASUVE in the relevant population (pediatric population).
`
`Required
`
`El Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study
`El Registry studies
`El Primary safety study or clinical trial
`El Pharrnacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to further assess safety
`El Thorough Q-T clinical trial
`El Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e. g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 12/21/2012
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3240292
`Reference ID: '3240292
`
`

`

`Continuation 0
`
`uestion 4
`
`E] Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
`IX Pharrnacokinetic studies or clinical trials
`I:I Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
`E] Dosing trials
`E] Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`
`
`|:I Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
`E] Irnmunogenicity as a marker of safety
`D Other (provide explanation)
`
`
`Agreed upon:
`
`El Quality study without a safety endpoint (e.g., manufacturing, stability)
`E] Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e.g., natural history of disease,
`background rates of adverse events)
`'
`El Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e g., in another condition,
`different disease severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpart H/E
`El Dose-response study or clinical trial performed for effectiveness
`E] Nonclinical study, not safety-related (specify)
`
`
`D Other
`
`
`5 .
`
`Is the PMR/PMC clear, feasible, and appropriate?
`
`IE Does the study/clinical trial meet criteria for PMRs or PMCs?
`[X Are the objectives clear from the description of the PMR/PMC?
`E Has the applicant adequately justified the choice of schedule milestone dates?
`E Has the applicant had sufficient time to review the PMRs/PMCs, ask questions, determine
`feasibility, and contribute to the development process?
`
`PMRfi’IMC Development Coordinator:
`
`This PMR/PMC has been reviewedfor clarity and consistency, and is necessary tofurtlzer refine
`the safety, eflicacy, 0r optimal use ofa drug, or to ensure consistency and reliability ofdrug
`quality.
`
`
`
`(signature line for BLAs)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 12/21/2012
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3240292
`Reference ID: 3240292
`
`

`

`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`NDA/BLA #
`
`022549
`
`Product Name:
`
`Adasuve (loxapine) inhalation powder
`
`1 891 —2
`
`PMR/PMC Description: A deferred pediatric study under PREA for the acute treatment of
`agitation associated with schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder in pediatric
`patients ages 10 to 17 years.
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones: Final Protocol Submission:
`
`10/1/2013
`
`9/30/2014
`Study/Trial Completion:
`3/30/2014
`Final Report Submission:
`Other: NA
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a .
`pre-approval requirement. Check type below and describe.
`
`-
`I: Unmet need
`[:l Life-threatening condition
`E] Long—term data needed
`[Z Only feasible to conduct post-approval
`I:I Prior clinical experience indicates safety
`El Small subpopulation affected
`E] Theoretical concern
`[:1 Other
`
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is
`a FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new
`safety information.”
`
`
`We are deferring submission of the pediatric study for ages 10 to 17 years for this
`application because this product is ready for approval for use in adults and the pediatric
`
`studies have not been completed.
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 12/21/2012
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3240292
`Reference ID: 3240292
`
`

`

`3.
`
`If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`
`— Which regulation?
`[:I Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
`El Animal Efficacy Rule
`[Z] Pediatric Research Equity Act
`E] FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`
`—
`
`—
`
`If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
`E] Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
`El Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
`E] Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious
`risk?
`’
`
`If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
`El AnabLsis of spontaneous postmarketirlggdverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if. such an analysis will not be sufficient to
`assess or identify a serious risk
`
`E] Analysis using pharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: the new pharrnacovigilance system that the
`FDA is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus
`not sufficient to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not
`sufficient to assess or identify a serious risk
`
`[I Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in humans that are not clinical trials as
`defined below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory
`experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if. a study will not be sufficient to identify or assess a
`serious risk
`
`I:I Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines
`the method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human
`subjects?
`
`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the
`study or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`
`A study of the efficacy and safety of ADASUVE in the relevant pediatric population.
`
`Required
`
`El Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study
`I:I Registry studies
`[Z Primary safety study or clinical trial
`I:I Pharmacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to further assess safety
`|:I Thorough Q—T clinical trial
`E] Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e. g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 12/21/2012
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3240292
`Reference ID: 3240292
`
`

`

`Continuation 0
`
`uestion 4
`
`El Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
`El Pharmacokinetic studies or clinical trials
`El Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
`El Dosing trials
`E] Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`
`
`El Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
`El Immunogenicity as a marker of safety
`[:1 Other (provide explanation)
`
`
`Agreed upon:
`
`El Quality study without a safety endpoint (e. g., manufacturing, stability)
`El Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e. g., natural history of disease,
`background rates of adverse events)
`[:1 Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e. g., in another condition,
`different disease severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpart H/E
`I:I Dose-response study or clinical trial performed for effectiveness
`El Nonclinical study, not safety-related (specify)
`
`'
`
`[:1 Other
`
`
`5.
`
`Is the PMR/PMC clear, feasible, and appropriate?
`
`[2 Does the study/clinical trial meet criteria for PMRs or PMCS?
`IX] Are the objectives clear from the description of the PMR/PMC?
`IX] Has the applicant adequately justified the choice of schedule milestone dates?
`Has the applicant had sufficient time to review the PMRs/PMCs, ask questions, determine
`feasibility, and contribute to the development process?
`
`PMR/P C Development Coordinator:
`This PMR/PMC has been reviewedfor clarity and consistency, and is necessary to further refine
`the safety, eflicacy, 0r optimal use ofa drug, or to ensure consistency and reliability ofdrug
`quality.
`
`
`
`(signature line for BLAs)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 12/21/2012
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3240292
`Reference ID: 3240292
`
`

`

`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`NDA/BLA #
`
`Product Name:
`
`022549
`
`
`Adasuve (loxapine) inhalation powder
`
`1 891 —3
`PMR/PMC Descriptioni You are required to conduct a large, non-randomized, open—label,
`postmarketing observational study to assess the risks of bronchospasm
`and related respiratory adverse events and serious outcomes (e.g.,
`hospitalization for respiratory adverse reactions, intubation, and
`mechanical ventilation) associated with ADASUVE treatment.
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones: Final Protocol Submission:
`
`6/1/2013
`
`6/1/2015
`Study/Trial Completion:
`12/1/2015
`Final Report Submission:
`Other: NA
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a
`pre-approval requirement. Check type below and describe.
`
`I:| Unmet need
`I:I Life—threatening condition
`El Long—term data needed
`[2 Only feasible to conduct post-approval
`[:1 Prior clinical experience indicates safety
`I:I Small subpopulation affected
`El Theoretical concern
`[:1 Other
`
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is
`a FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new
`safety information.”
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 12/21/201211—40/204—2
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3240292
`Reference ID: 3240292
`
`

`

`3.
`
`If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not aPMR, skip to 4.
`
`— Which regulation?
`E] Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
`E] Animal Efficacy Rule
`E] Pediatric Research Equity Act
`IE FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`
`—
`
`—
`
`If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
`[I Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
`IE Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
`El Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious
`risk?
`
`If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
`E] Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: such an analysis will not be sufficient to
`assess or identify a serious risk
`
`E] Analysis using pharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: the new pharmacovigilance system that the
`FDA is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus
`not sufficient to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not
`sufficient to assess or identify a serious risk
`
`IE Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in humans that are not clinical trials as
`defined below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory
`experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if: a study will not be sufficient to identify or assess a
`serious risk
`
`El Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines
`the method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human
`subjects?
`'
`
`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the
`study or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`
`
`
`A large, non—randomized, open-label, postmarketing observational study to assess the risks
`of bronchospasm and related respiratoryadverse events and serious outcomes (e. g.,
`hospitalization, intubation, mechanicalventilation, or rescue medication for the
`
`
`management of respiratory reactions) associated with ADASUVE treatment.
`
`
`Required
`
`[2 Observational pharrnacoepidemiologic study
`I:] Registry studies
`I:I Primary safety study or clinical trial
`E] Pharrnacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to further assess safety
`1:! Thorough Q—T clinical trial
`|:I Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e. g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 12/21/20124—lA297L20-12
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3240292
`Reference ID: 3240292
`
`

`

`Continuation 01 Question 4
`
`El Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
`El Pharinacokinetic studies or clinical trials
`El Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
`E] Dosing trials
`El Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`
`[:l Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
`E] Immunogenicity as a marker of safety
`C] Other (provide explanation)
`
`
`Agreed upon:
`
`E] Quality study without a safety endpoint (e.g., manufacturing, stability)
`I:I Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e.g., natural history of disease,
`background rates of adverse events)
`E] Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e. g., in another condition,
`different disease severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpart H/E
`E] Dose-response study or clinical trial performed for effectiveness
`El Nonclinical study, not safety—related (specify)
`
`
`El Other
`
`
`5.
`
`Is the PMR/PMC clear, feasible, and appropriate?
`[Z Does the study/clinical trial meet criteria for PMRs or PMCs?
`[X Are the objectives clear from the description of the PMR/PMC?
`[Z Has the applicant adequately justified the choice of schedule milestone dates?
`IE Has the applicant had sufficient time to review the PMRs/PMCs, ask questions, determine
`feasibility, and contribute to the development process?
`7—"?—:r:::—rz~v:7~; — v: ~ v r:—-~~>, snmzriwz :-~- -:T‘: 'rr‘it‘ --;~.—r:-:~:-r7—: “T'.?V“‘TT:":::::”:::":1»;fi'fif?‘ —-,~Mr: ‘3', «rm »-,—~——-:—7~ r—~~>, ,—,——~
`
`v: :- -- e .7. .x-xrxT—Hiw'w’ "Mue—
`
`PMR/P C Development Coordinator:
`This PMR/PMC has been reviewedfor clarity and consistency, and is necessary to further refine
`the safety, eflicacy, or optimal use ofa drug, or to ensure consistency and reliability ofdrug
`quality.
`
`
`
`(signature line for BLAs)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 12/21/20124—14—2-9404—2
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3240292
`Reference ID: 3240292
`
`

`

`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`NDA/BLA #
`
`022549
`
`Product Name:
`
`Adasuve (loxapine) inhalation powder
`
`1 891 —4
`
`PMR/PMC Description: A single-dose GLP developmental juvenile rat tolerability and
`toxicokinetic study of loxapine by inhalation route that spans the
`corresponding ages for the pediatric clinical studies (ages 10 to 17
`years).
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones: Final Protocol Submission:
`
`‘
`
`NA
`
`NA
`Study/Trial Completion:
`5/31/2013
`‘
`Final Report Submission:
`Other: NA
`
`_
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a
`pre-approval requirement. Check type below and describe.
`
`-
`I:I Unmet need
`I:I Life-threatening condition
`[:I Long-term data needed
`IE Only feasible to conduct post-approval
`1:] Prior clinical experience indicates safety
`El Small subpopulation affected
`|:I Theoretical concern
`[:1 Other
`
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is
`a FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new
`safety information.”
`
`The study will evaluate the potential pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic differences
`among different ages in rats, and the results may apply to potential differences between
`
`adults and children.
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 12/21/2012
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3240292
`Reference ID: 3240292
`
`

`

`3.
`
`If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`
`— Which regulation?
`El Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
`E] Animal Efficacy Rule
`[3 Pediatric Research Equity Act
`D FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`
`—
`
`—
`
`If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
`D Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
`El Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
`D Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious
`risk?
`
`If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
`
`I:I Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if such an analysis will not be sufficient to
`assess or identify a serious risk
`
`'
`
`
`E] Analysis usingpharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if. the new pharmacovigilance system that the
`FDA is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus
`not sufficient to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not
`sufficient to assess or identify a serious risk
`
`[:I Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in humans that are not clinical trials as
`defined below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory
`experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if. a study will not be sufficient to identify or assess a
`serious risk
`
`[:1 Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines
`the method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human
`subjects?
`
`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the
`study or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`
`M“)
`I A single dose inhalation tolerability and toxicokinetic study in the rat,
`lb) (4)
`that span the corresponding ages proposed for the pediatric pharmacokinetic
`and efficacy trials (10 — 17 years).
`
`
`
`Required
`
`El Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study
`[:I Registry studies
`El Primary safety study or clinical trial
`[:I Pharmacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to further assess safety
`E] Thorough Q-T clinical trial
`[:I Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e.g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 12/21/2012 ‘
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3240292
`
`

`

`Continuation o
`
`uestion 4
`
`[:1 Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
`El Pharmacokinetic studies or clinical trials
`[:I Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
`E] Dosing trials
`E] Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`
`
`‘
`
`El Meta—analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
`E] Immunogenicity as a marker of safety
`E] Other'(provide explanation)
`
`
`Agreed upon:
`
`1:] Quality study Without a safety endpoint (e. g, manufacturing, stability)
`I:I Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e. g., natural history of disease,
`background rates of adverse events)
`[I Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e. g., in another condition,
`different disease severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpart H/E
`El Dose-response study or clinical trial performed for effectiveness
`Nonclinical study, not safety-related (specify)
`
`A single-dose GLP developmental juvenile rat tolerability and toxicokinetic study.
`D Other
`
`5.
`
`Is the PMR/PMC clear, feasible, and appropriate?
`
`E Does the study/clinical trial meet criteria for PMRs or PMCs?
`IX Are the objectives clear from the description of the PMR/PMC?
`IE Has the applicant adequately justified the choice of schedule milestone dates?
`IE Has the applicant had sufficient time to review the PMRs/PMCs, ask questions, determine
`feasibility, and contribute to the development process?
`
`P
`
`C Development Coordinator:
`This PMR/PMC has been reviewedfor clarity and consistency, and is necessary to further refine
`the safety, eflicacy, 0r optimal use ofa drug, or to ensure consistency and reliability of drug
`quality.
`
`
`
`(signature line for BLAs)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 12/21/2012
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3240292
`Reference ID: 3240292
`
`

`

`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`NDA/BLA #
`
`Product Name:
`
`022549
`
`Adasuve (loxapine) inhalation powder
`
`PMR/PMC Description:
`
`1 891 -5
`Implement, within 6 months of approval, the appropr'
`routine extraction testin with acce tance criteria for
`
`‘
`
`to ensure
`
`
`
`that levels remain below the levels that have been qualified by the risk
`assessments in Module 4.
`
`
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones: Final Protocol Submission:
`
`Study/Trial Completion:
`
`Final Report Submission:
`Other:
`
`NA
`
`NA
`
`4/30/20 1 3
`NA
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a
`pro-approval requirement. Check type below and describe.
`
`I] Unmet need
`D Lifethreatening condition
`[I Long-term data needed
`I: Only feasible to conduct post-approval
`El Prior clinical experience indicates safety
`[I Small subpopulation affected
`ITheoretical concern
`[I Other
`
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is
`a FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new
`safety information.”
`
`
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`,
`
`Last Updated 12/21/2012
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3240292
`
`

`

`3.
`
`If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`
`— Which regulation?
`E] Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
`E] Animal Efficacy Rule
`[:1 Pediatric Research Equity Act
`I: FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`
`—
`
`—
`
`If the PIVIR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
`1:] Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
`D Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
`El Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious
`risk?
`
`If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
`El Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if such an analysis will not be sufficient to
`assess or identify a serious risk
`
`E] Analysis using pharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if. the new pharmacovigilance system that the
`FDA is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus
`not sufficient to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not
`sufficient to assess or identify a serious risk
`
`D Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in'humans that are not clinical trials as
`defined below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory
`experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if: a study will not be sufficient to identify or asSess a
`serious risk
`
`[:1 Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines
`the method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human
`subjects?
`
`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the
`study or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`
`(hm)
`
`Reguired
`
`[:1 Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study
`E] Registry studies
`I:I Primary safety study or clinical trial
`El Pharmacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to fiirther assess safety
`I: Thorough Q-T clinical trial
`
`PM R/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 12/21/2012
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3240292
`
`

`

`D Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e. g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
`[:I Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
`El Pharmacokinetic studies or clinical trials
`E] Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
`E] Dosing trials
`El Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`
`I:I Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
`E] Immunogenicity as a marker of safety
`C] Other (provide explanation)
`
`Agreed upon:
`
`IZI Quality study without a safety endpoint (e.g., manufacturing, stability)
`El Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e. g., natural history of disease,
`background rates of adverse events)
`'
`I:] Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e.g., in another condition,
`different disease severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpart H/E
`El Dose-response study or clinical trial performed for effectiveness
`E] Nonclinical study, not safety-related (specify)
`
`IE Other
`The results of the extractables studies on the process validation drug product batches will be
`used to guide the applicant to developing routine controls for the named volatile compounds
`that can potentially be emitted during patient use.
`
`5.
`
`Is the PMR/PMC clear, feasible, and appropriate?
`
`IX] Does the study/clinical trial meet criteria for PMRs or PMCs?
`Are the objectives clear from the description of the PMR/PMC?
`IE Has the applicant adequately justified the choice of schedule milestone dates?
`[Z Has the applicant had sufficient time to review the PMRs/PMCs, ask questions, determine
`feasibility, and contribute to the development process?
`
`P
`
`C Development Coordinator:
`This PMR/PMC has been reviewedfor clarity and consistency, and is necessary to further refine
`the safety, eflicacy, 0r optimal use ofa drug, or to ensure consistency and reliability ofdrug
`quality.
`
`
`
`(signature line for BLAS)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 12/21/2012
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 3240292
`Reference ID: 3240292
`
`

`

`505(b)(2) ASSESSMENT
`
`NDA # 022549
`
`NDA Supplement #: NA
`
`Eflicacy Supplement Type: NA
`
`Proposed Indication(s): Acute Treatment of Agitation Associated with Schizophrenia or Bipolar
`
`Proprietary Name: Adasuve
`Established/Proper Name:
`loxapine inhalation powder
`Dosage Form:
`inhalation powder
`Stren hs: 10m
`
`Applicant: Alexza Pharmaceuticals
`
`Date of Receipt: 6/21/2012 (Complete Response)
`Ori 4' I al submission — 12/11/2009; 15'
`cle CR 8-4-2011: 2"“ c cle CR 5-2-2012
`
`PDUFA Goal Date: 12/21/2012
`
`Action Goal Date (if difl'erent):
`Earlde November
`
`GENERAL INFORMATION
`
`1)
`
`Is this application for a recombinant or biologically-derived product and/or protein or
`peptide product OR is the applicant relying on a recombinant or biologically-derived
`product and/or protein or peptide product to support approval of the proposed product?
`
`YES
`
`|:|
`
`N0|Z|
`
`If “YES “contact the (b)(2) review staflin the Immediate Oflice, Ofiice ofNew
`Drugs.
`
`Version March 2009
`
`Reference ID: 3234692
`
`page 1
`
`

`

`INFORMATION PROVIDED VIA RELIANCE
`(LISTED DRUG OR LITERATURE)
`
`
`2) List the information essential to the approval of the proposed drug that is provided by
`reliance on our previous finding of safety and efficacy for a listed drug or by reliance on
`published literature. (If not clearly identified by the applicant, this information can usually
`be derived from annotated labeling.)
`
`
`Source of information* (e.g.,
`published literature, name of
`referenced product)
`Loxitane (NDA 017525)
`
`Information provided (e.g.,
`pharmacokinetic data, or specific
`sections of labeling)
`NonClinical Safety Information
`
`Loxitane IM (NDA 018039)
`
`NonClinical Safety Information
`
`
`
` *each source of information should be listed on separate rows
`
`
`3) Reliance on information regarding another product (whether a previously approved product
`or from published literature) must be scientifically appropriate. An applicant needs to
`provide a scientific “bridge” to demonstrate the relationship of the referenced and
`proposed products. Describe how the applicant bridged the proposed product to the
`referenced product(s).
`
`Alexza conducted a 14 day inhalation study in rat (Study # N106043) and a 28 day
`inhalation study in dog (Study # 78670) demonstrating that systemic exposure
`was achieved following this route of administration, and that the overall toxicity profile
`was not appreciably different than that observed following oral administration. Alexza
`conducted an in vitro metabolism study demonstrating that no novel metabolites were
`generated in lung microsomes as compared to liver microsomes (Study # AZ004-DM-
`003).
`
`
`RELIANCE ON PUBLISHED LITERATURE
`
`
`4) (a) Regardless of whether the applicant has explicitly stated a reliance on published
`literature to support their application, is reliance on published literature necessa

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket