throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`208684Orig1s000
`208685Orig1s000
`
`
`CHEMISTRY REVIEW(S)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`QUALITY ASSESSNIENT
`
`Recommendation: Approve
`
`NDA 208684
`
`Review # l
`
`Emflaza (deflazacort) tablets
`
`6 mg, 18 mg, 30 mg, and 36 mg
`
`N/A
`
`Rx
`
`Marathon Phannaceuticals
`
`DISCIPLINE
`
`DIVISION/BRANCH
`
`Quality Review Team
`
`Drug Substance
`
`Ray Frankewich
`
`ONDP/DNDP I/Branch I
`
`Drug Product
`
`Microbiology
`
`Process Manager
`
`Andrei Ponta
`
`Mark Johnson
`
`Mark Johnson
`
`Michael Shanks
`
`ONDP/DNDP I/Branch I
`
`OPF/DPA/Branch I
`
`OPF/DPA/Branch I
`
`OPF/DIA/Branch I
`
`Yang Zhao
`
`ONDP/DB/Branchl
`
`
`
`———
`———
`———
`
`OPQ-XOPQ NDA 208684
`
`Page 1 0f 9
`
`Effective Date: 20 April 2016
`
`

`

`QUALITY ASSESSMENT
`
`SUBMISSIONS REVIEWED
`(SD #)
`
`NDA 208684
`
`DOCUMENT DATE
`
`DISCIPLINE(S)
`AFFECTED
`
`Received: 23-Jan—2017
`
`SD#: 0012
`
`SD#: 0014
`
`SD#: 0020
`SD#: 0021
`
`Received: 6-Sep-2016
`
`Drug Product
`
`Received: 11-Nov-2016
`
`Drug Product
`
`Received: 17-Jan-2016
`Received: 17-Jan-2017
`
`Drug Substance. Facilities
`
`(83:62:13): to SD#_ 0022)
`
`Received: 23-Jan-2017
`
`Drug Substance. Drug Product
`
`SD: 0024
`
`OPQ-XOPQ NDA 208684
`
`Page 2 0f 9
`
`Effective Date: 20 April 2016
`
`

`

`QUALITY ASSESSNIENT
`
`NDA 208684
`
`Quality Review Data Sheet
`
`1. RELATED/SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
`
`Type
`
`Holder
`
`(b)(4) H
`
`
`Item Referenced
`(5) (4)
`
`II
`
`III
`
`HI
`
`III
`
`111
`
`III
`
`HI
`
`III
`
`Status
`
`Adequate
`
`Date Revnew
`Completed
`12/1/2016
`
`Adequate
`
`Comments
`.
`Renewed by M‘
`Cooper
`
`Rew'ewed by R.
`Frankewich for
`
`NDA but supplier
`withdrawn by
`applicant.
`
`N/Al
`
`N/Al
`
`N/A1
`
`N/A1
`
`N/A1
`
`N/Al
`
`N/A1
`
`1 Adequate information in application or no changes to information since previous reviews.
`
`B. Other Documents: IND, RLD, or sister applications
`
`DOCUMENT APPLICATION NUMBER
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`)(4)
`
`formulation
`
`119258
`
`BA/BE studies to support the current NDAs
`208684 and 208585 for Deflazacort tablets
`
`and oral suspension, respectively
`
`NDA
`
`208685
`
`Application for Deflazacort 208684 tablet
`
`OPQ-XOPQ NDA 208684
`
`Page 3 0f 9
`
`Effective Date: 20 April 2016
`
`

`

`QUALITY ASSESSNIENT
`
`NDA 208684
`
`2. CONSULTS
`
`—_—-—
`—_—-—
`
`—_—-— —_—-—
`
`—_—-—
`
`OPQ-XOPQ NDA 208684
`
`Page 4 0f 9
`
`Effective Date: 20 April 2016
`
`

`

`QUALITY ASSESSNIENT
`
`NDA 208684
`
`Executive Summary
`
`1.
`
`Recommendations and Conclusion on Approvability
`
`The Office of Product Quality (OPQ) review team recommends that the Agency
`Approve NDA 208684 for Emflaza® (deflazacort) tablets. From a quality
`perspective, the application, as amended, provides adequate information to ensure
`that the applicant can consistently manufacture a product that is suitable for use
`by the intended patients.
`
`H.
`
`Summary of Quality Assessments
`
`A. Product Overview
`
`Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a rare recessive X—linked disorder that
`results in progressive muscle weakness and loss of muscle mass, loss of
`movement, and ultimately death. The disease is caused by mutations in DMD, the
`gene encoding dystrophin, a sarcolemma protein critical to the structural stability
`of myofibers in skeletal and cardiac muscle. Dystrophin mutations induce a shift
`in the open reading frame of the dystrophin transcript, leading to the absence of
`fimctional dystrophin protein.
`
`One drug, eteplirsen, was approved via the accelerated approval pathway for
`treatment of DMD in September 2016. Use of eteplirsen, an antisense
`oligonucleotide that targets specific DMD mutations, is limited to a small subset
`of patients and there is limited clinical evidence of effectiveness. Otherwise,
`treatment is limited to off-label use of corticosteroids such as prednisone to delay
`loss of muscle strength and supportive measures.
`
`The applicant proposes use of deflazacort, a synthetic glucocorticosteroid
`structurally similar to prednisone and prednisolone, for treatment of patients with
`Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Deflazacort is an acetate ester prodrug; the active
`moiety is the 21-hydroxy metabolite.
`
`
`
`Deflazacort
`
`Prednisone
`
`Prednisolone
`
`OPQ-XOPQ NDA 208684
`
`Page 5 of 9
`
`Effective Date: 20 April 2016
`
`

`

`
`
`QUALITY ASSESSMENT
`
`NDA 208684
`
`Deflazacort was first marketed outside the US, under the trade name Calcort, in
`1982. It is currently available in several countries as tablets or oral
`ion for
`
`treatment of a varie of indications res nsive to
`ucocorticoids.
`
`
`
`Although physicians
`
`
`' one to treat patients with
`cort as an temative to p
`equen y use
`DMD, it is not approved for this indication in any cormtry.
`
`Marathon Pharmaceuticals has developed an immediate release tablet that is
`qualitatively similar to the Calcort tablets marketed by Sanofi-aventis. Under
`NDA 208684, the applicant proposes marketing of tablets containing 6 mg,
`18 mg, 30 mg or 36 mg deflazacort for treatment of DMD.
`
`Proposed Indication(s)
`including Intended Patient
`Population
`
`Treatment ofpatients with Duchenne muscular
`dystrophy. The patient population is expected to
`be males ranging in age from children to young
`adults.
`
`Duration omeunent
`
`Maximum Daily Dose
`
`The recommended dose
`
`routes of administration.
`
`Alternative Methods of
`Administration
`
`Deflazacort tablets may be crushed and mixed
`with applesauce. The mixture should be
`consumed immediately afier preparation.
`
`The applicant proposes an oral suspension under
`NDA 208685. There are no other alternative
`
`B. Quality Assessment Overview
`
`Drug Substance
`
`
`powder that is poorly soluble in water and has a
`Deflazacort is a white
`
`mt
`tween 254°C and 256°C. It is stable in the solid
`relativel hi meltin
`
`
`
`OPQ-XOPQ NDA 208684
`
`Page 6 of 9
`
`Effective Date: 20 April 2016
`
`

`

` QUALITY ASSESSMENT
`
`NDA 208684
`
`
`
`The bulk active '
`'ent AP used to manufacture commercial product will be
`
`s
`lied b
`. Due to its poor solubility, the API is
`
`. Information regarding the
`
`characterization, manufacture, and control of the API is incorporated by cross-
`reference t
`drug master file (DMF- The DMF has been
`reviewed and deemed adequate to support approval of the NDA. [Refer to M.
`Cooper review dated 12/l/2016.] The NDA itself includes a summary of general
`properties of deflazacort and the drug product manufacturer’s acceptance
`specification, with associated analytical procedures and method validation. The
`information provided in the NDA is adequate.
`
`lier,_ as the
`The original NDA submission provided for a second
`provided API used for
`primary source of API for Deflazacort tablets.
`clinical studies under IND 119258 and manufacture of some stability batches.
`_ DMF- was reviewed and deemed acceptable. [Refer to R.
`Frankewich review dated 12/6/2016] The information provided in the NDA is
`a
`uate and the
`licant has provided data to support equivalence of API
`. However, due to concerns abouta- contract
`manufacturer, the applicant has withdrawn
`as a supplier for
`commercial manufacture. The review team
`etermined that the contract
`
`manufacturer in question did not produce any materials used to support
`development of Deflazacort tablets. Thus, there is no material impact on the
`validity of investigational studies conducted using- sourced API.
`
`Drug Product
`
`The proposed products are immediate-release tablets that contain 6 mg, 18 mg,
`30 mg, or 36 mg deflazacort per tablet. The tablets contain conventional
`pharmaceutical excipients, i.e., colloidal silicon dioxide, lactose monohydrate,
`magnesium stearate, and pre-gelatinized corn starch, all of which comply with
`compendial standards.
`
`Deflazacort tablets are manufactured fro
`
` The data provided support the
`
`OPQ-XOPQ NDA 208684
`
`Page 7 of 9
`
`Efiective Date: 20 April 2016
`
`

`

` QUALITY ASSESSMENT
`
`NDA 208684
`
`lack of any significant effect on content uniformity or dissolution behavior over
`the ranges studied.
`
`The proposed regulatory specification for Deflazacort tablets includes test
`parameters that are typical for an immediate-release tablet. In general, the
`analytical procedures are straightforward and supported by adequate method
`validation studies. One issue, which does not afl'ect the overall recommendation,
`was identified during the review. The proposed dissolution medium for
`Deflazacort tablets contains 0.3% sodium la
`1 sulfate SLS .
`
`
`
`Deflazacort tablets are acka ed in
`
`HDPE bottles with
`
`closures. The 6 mg Deflazacort tablets are
`packaged in 100-count bottles; the remaining strengths are packaged in 30-c01mt
`bottles. Based on stability data provided in the application, a 36-month shelf life
`is granted for product stored at controlled room temperature.
`
`Methods Ver'g‘ication
`
`The I-IPLC methods for determination of assay and related substances in the bulk
`API and Deflazacort tablets were submitted to the Division of Pharmaceutical
`
`Analysis (DPA) for verification. DPA has determined that the methods are
`suitable for regulatory use with minor modifications. As the methods verification
`process is ongoing, standard language regarding cooperation with methods
`verification should be included in the action letter.
`
`Facilities
`
`All facilities that will be involved in commercial manufacture and testing of
`Deflazacort and Emflaza® (deflazacort) tablets are currently acceptable.
`
`C. Special Product Quality Labeling Recommendations
`
`There are no special labeling recommendations.
`
`OPQ-XOPQ NDA 208684
`
`Page 8 of 9
`
`Effective Date: 20 April 2016
`
`

`

`"*"~"
`w
`
`QUALITY ASSESSMENT
`
`"""""
`...-..........
`
`NDA 208684
`
`I). Finn] Risk Assessment for Deflazacort Tablets
`
`Excipients were chosen based on flleit
`previous use in Calcon lableis marketed
`outside the US and compatibility vaified
`during fuumlation development.
`The tablet malmfachner uses
`
`Deflazaeottexists
`fonn. Tablet II
`1 H
`
`r
`
`<6Datteeaseandonstabili1y.
`
`Routinecommls fothi
`mata'ials
`
`riskraw
`
`TedmgperUSP<61>
`
`omxopq NDA 208684
`
`Page 9 of 9
`
`Eflective Date: 20 Apn'l 2016
`
`

`

`Martha
`Heimann
`
`Digitally signed by Martha Heimann
`Date: 1/30/2017 12:12:45PM
`GUID: 504f845f00000ed260627d268a8cdc9d
`
`32 Page(s) has been Withheld in Full as b4 (CCI/TS) immediately following this page
`
`

`

`QUALITY ASSESSMENT
`
`Reviewer’s Assessment: Adequate
`
`The applicant’s claim for categorical exclusion is acceptable and adequate for approval ofthe
`application.
`
`Labeling
`
`Package Insert
`
`HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION
`Ihese highlights do not include all the information needed to use
`ERG-LAM“ safely Ild efl'etfiwly. See full prewribiug information for
`
`EMTLAZA. Behavmalandmooddiumbames: Myhchdeelphodginsomn,
`
`[Rn-"LAM“ (defiant-art) table“, for anal use
`EMFLAZA" (defluuort) oral suspension
`mm U.S. Approval: 1017
`
`-—-—-————INDICAIIONSANDI:SAGE———————————
`
`EMFLAZAisaconieosuoid indicatedint‘hetnmmto_
`Duchenne muscular dystrophy. (l )
`
`DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION
`.m. (a 1) —DRUG INTERACTIONS—
`
`Revised: 8/2016
`
`—ADV}ZRS£ REACTIONS—
`- Mostcommonadvusemacfions
`0%fotEMFLAZA)m
`Cudlingoid.
`weight increased. econ] obesity.
`
`To report SUSPECTED ADVERSE REACTIONS contact Marathon
`Pharmaceuticals, LLC at 1-866-562—4620 or
`DrugSafothEopharmEognmom or FDA at l-800-FDA-1088 or
`wwwfdaggvlnedwatth
`
`
`
`SM 17 for PATIENT COUNSEI'JNG lNFORl-IATION
`
`—-——————DOSAGE FORLIS AND STRENGTHS——-———
`0
`Tablets: 6mg,18mg, 30mgmd36m 3
`-
`222 22222-22 222222h
`----—-———-—————CON‘I'RAINDICAIIONs-—
`-——-~
`-
`Hypatensitivity to deflaacm or any of the inactive inyedimts in
`EMFLAZA (4)
`2
`
`2
`
`Reviewer’s Assessment: Adequate
`
`

`

`QUALITY ASSESSMENT
`
`The package insert contains the proprietary and established name. The dosage form and strength
`is also present on the label. This is acceptable.
`
`(b) “Full Prescribing Information” Section
`
`3
`
`DOSAGE FORDIS AND STRENGTHS
`
`
`Tablets
`
`0
`
`6 mg: White and round with “6" debossed on one side
`
`18 mg: White and round with “18“ debossed on one side
`30 mg: White and oval with “30“ debossed on one side
`
`36 mg: White and oval with “36“ debossed on one side
`
`Oral Suspension
`.
`22.75 mg/mL:
`
`(5)“)
`
`.
`.
`.
`whitish suspenswn
`
`m
`
`Reviewer-’5 Assessment: Adequate
`
`The dosage form and strength section contains the dosage form, strength, and identifying
`characteristics of the dosage form. However, the label contains excipient information which is
`not appropriate for this section.
`
`

`

`QUALITY ASSESSMENT
`
`11
`
`DESCRIPTION
`
`The active ingredient in EMFLAZA is deflazacort (a corticosteroid). Corticosteroids are
`adrenocortical steroids. both naturally occurring and synthetic. The molecular formula for
`deflazacort is C25H31N06. The chemical name for deflazacort is (l lB.l6B)—21—(acetyloxy)—
`l 1-hylroxy—2'-methyl-5'H-pregna—1,4-dieno[l7.16-d]oxazole-3.20-dione, and the structural
`formula is:
`
`
`
`0/
`
`Deflazacort is a white to off white. odorless fine powder and has a molecular weight of
`441.517. Deflazacort is freely soluble in acetic acid and dichloromethane and soluble in
`methanol and acetone.
`
`EMFLAZA is an immediate-release tablet in strengths of 6. 18. 30 and 36 mg and an
`immediate-release oral suspension in a strength of 22.75 mg/mL. Each tablet contains
`deflazacort and the following inactive ingredients: colloidal silicon dioxide. lactose
`
`monohydrate. magnesnun stearate. and pre-gelatmrzed corn starch. The oral suspension
`contains deflazacort and the following inactive ingredients: acetic acid. aluminum
`magnesium silicate. benzyl alcohol. carboxymethylcellulose sodium. polysorbate 80. purified
`water. and sorbitol.
`
`Reviewer’s Assessment: Adequate
`
`The description section contains the proprietary and established name, the dosage form, drug
`product excipients, route of administration, active moiety expression of strength, therapeutic
`class, chemical name, structural formula, molecular weight.
`
`The statement of strength may need to be reworded.
`
`16
`
`HOW SUPPLIED/STORAGE AND HANDLING
`
`How Supplied
`16.1
`EMFLAZA Tablets
`
`0
`
`6 mg are white. round with “6“ debossed on one side. They are supplied as follows:
`
`

`

`QUALITY ASSESSMENT
`
`NDC 42998-501-01
`
`Bottle of 100 tablets
`
`o
`
`o
`
`0
`
`18 mg are white. round with "l 8“ debossed on one side. They are supplied as follows:
`NDC 42998-502-03
`Bottle of 30 tablets
`
`30 mg are white. oval with “30“ debossed on one side. They are supplied as follows:
`NDC 42998-503-03
`Bottle of 30 tablets
`
`36 mg are white. oval with “36" debossed on one side. They are supplied as follows:
`NDC 42998-504-03
`Bottle of 30 tablets
`
`EMFLAZA Oral Suspension
`
`0
`
`22.75 mg/rnL is a whitish colored suspension. Supplied as 13 mL in a 20111L bottle
`
`packaged with two 1 mL oral dispensers.
`NDC 42998-505-21
`
`Reviewer’s Assessment: Adequate
`
`The how supplied section contains the following information: dosage form, strength, available
`units, and the identification of dosage form. This is acceptable.
`
`Storage and Handling
`16.2
`Store at [20 to 25°C (68 to 77°F). See USP controlled room temperattu‘e.
`
`Reviewer’s Assessment: Adequate
`
`The storage and handling information is included; however, the excursion temperatures are not
`included.
`
`Manufactured for:
`
`Marathon Pharmaceuticals, LLC
`
`Northbrook. IL 60062 USA
`
`EMFLAZA Oral Suspension made in Spain
`
`PC####X Month Year
`
`MARATHON 9a
`PHARMACEUTICALS. LLC V.
`
`cm
`
`EMFLAZATM
`
`mademarks of Marathon Pharmaceuticals. LLC.
`
`«m
`
`

`

`, CEDM
`
`Immediate Container Label
`
`Carton Labeling
`
`

`

`QUALITY ASSESSM ENT
`
`Reviewer’s Assessment: Adequate
`
`The label complies with regulatory requirements from a CMC perspective. It bears the “Rx only”
`statement, the NDC number, name of manufacturer, lot number, expiration date, net contents, bar
`code, strength, and the name (proprietary and established). Each strength is differentiated based
`on color: 6 mg is
`(mo 18 mg is
`(mo, 30 mg is
`«no, and 36 mg is
`(m4).
`
`Methods Verification Package - None
`
`Reviewer’s Assessment: Not Applicable
`
`Comparability Protocols - None
`
`Reviewer’s Assessment: Not Applicable
`
`Post-Approval Commitments
`
`Reviewer’s Assessment: Not Applicable
`
`Lifecycle Management Considerations
`
`Reviewer’s Assessment: Not Applicable
`
`List ofDeficiencies - None
`
`Primary Drug Product Reviewer Name and Date: Andrei Ponta, Ph.D.
`
`Secondary Reviewer Name and Date:
`
`

`

`Wendy
`Wilson- Lee
`
`Andrei
`Ponta
`
`Digitally signed by Wendy Wilson- Lee
`Date: 12/08/2016 01 34:30PM
`GUID: 50816dbc000085595ca3284bbca465a8
`
`Digitally signed by Andrei Ponta
`Date: 12/08/2016 12 22:51PM
`GUID: 53b58e0b00004a630e714ee170af4c26
`
`33 Page(s) has been Withheld in Full as b4 (CCI/TS) immediately following this page
`
`

`

`BIOPHARMACEUTICS
`
`NDA: 208684-0RIG—1
`
`Drug Product Name/Strength: EMFLAZATM (deflazacort) Tablets/6 mg, 18 mg, 30
`mg, 36 mg
`
`Route of Administration: Oral
`
`Applicant Name: Marathon Pharmaceuticals LLC.
`
`Product Background:
`
`EMFLAZATM is a corticosteroid indicated in the treatment of patients with Duchenne
`
`muscular dystrophy (DMD). The recommended dose of EMFLAZA is 0.9 mg/kg/day
`
`administered orally as a single daily dose. EMFLAZA tablets can be taken with or
`
`without food. The drug product can be administered whole or crushed and taken
`
`immediately afler being mixed in applesauce.
`
`Different Drug Product Formulations and Manufacturers:
`
`_ are former and current manufacturing sites for different
`deflazacort tablet formulations. In 2014, the manufacturing process and analytical test
`methods for the deflazacort 6 mg tablets were transferred from_
`— which is designated
`as the commercial manufacturer of deflazacort tablets.
`
`_ have the same formulations and manufacturing process-
`
`REWEWSUJIIIIIARY:
`
`Submission: Marathon Pharmaceuticals LLC., submitted this NDA for EMFLAZAIM
`(deflazacort) Tablets 6 mg, 18 mg, 30 mg, 36 mg under section 505 (b)(1) of the Federal
`Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act.
`
`Reviewer ’5 Assessment:
`
`Dissolution Test: Thefollowing dissolution method and acceptance criterion are acceptable:
`Apparatus."
`USP Tvpe II (Paddle)
`Speed:
`50 rpm
`Medium:
`50 nIMNaH2P04 bufler + 0.3% SLS, pH 6.8
`Volume:
`500 mL
`
`Temperature:
`3 7 °C
`Dissolution acceptance criterion: Q:.% in 15 minutes
`
`

`

`
`
`Biowaiver Request: Based on the provided data, the biowaiver requestfor the proposed
`drug product 6 mg, 18 mg, and 30 mg tablet strengths is granted.
`
`Recommendation: From the Biopharmaceutics perspective, NDA 208684 for
`EMFLAZA’M (deflazacort) Tablets 6 mg, 18 mg, 30 mg, 36 mg is recommended for
`APPROVAL.
`
`List Submissions being reviewed:
`
`0 Original NDA 208684 submitted on Jun 09, 2016.
`
`o Applicant’s Response dated Jan 17, 2017 to the Information Request dated Jan 10,
`2017.
`
`o Applicant’s Quality Information Amendment dated Jan 19, 2017.
`
`Highlight Key Outstanding Issues from Last Cycle: None. This is the first review
`
`cycle.
`
`Concise Description of Outstanding Issues: None.
`
`BCS Designation
`
`The Applicant did not request a BCS designation for either deflazacort drug substance or
`tablets.
`
`Solubility: Deflazacort API is practically insoluble in water (0.1 mg/mL at 37 °C). It is
`
`soluble in DMSO (88 mg/mL at 25 °C) and ethanol (12 mg/mL at 25 °C). It is slightly
`
`soluble in methanol and acetone. It is freely soluble in acetic acid and dichloromethane.
`
`
`Table l. Solubility of deflazacort in different solutions (Page 97, Module 2.7.1).
`Solubility mull: - 37": - mastic-l stirring 1H and 2‘"
`
`
`
`Flltntlon on glass fiber filter 1|l'll
`Doionizod
`USP Mar
`USP buffer
`USP Mat
`
`
`water
`pH 1.2
`pH 4.5
`pH 6.8
`
`
`
`Permeability: No permeability data of deflazacort are provided in this NDA.
`
`

`

`Dissolution Method and Acceptance Criterion
`
`Dissolution method:
`
`The proposed dissolution method for deflazacort tablets 6 mg, 18 mg, 30 mg, 36 mg is as
`follows (Page 5, Module 3.2.P.5.2.2):
`Apparatus:
`USP apparatus 11 (Paddle)
`Paddle Speed:
`50 rpm
`Medium:
`50 mM NaH2P04 bufi'er + 0.3% SLS, pH 6.8
`Volume:
`500 mL
`
`Temperature:
`
`37 °C
`
`Rationale ot dissolution medium pH: With respect to the selection of the dissolution
`
`medium, 0.01 N HCl (500 mL) was initially tested for the deflazacort 6 mg tablets by
`
`(Page 69, Module 2.7.1).
`
`Therefore, the use of sodium phosphate buffer at pH 6.8 is acceptable.
`
`Rationale [or using the sugtactanti SLS, in the dissolution medium: With respect to the
`
`use of surfactant in the dissolution medium, it is reported by the Applicant that sodium
`lauryl sulfate (SLS) concentrations of 0.3%- ensure adequate and comparable
`solubility of deflazacort.
`
`Given the rapid dissolution (more than .% dissolved in 15 minutes) of the proposed
`deflazacort tablets 6 mg, 18 mg, 30 mg, 36 mg manufacturedat—
`(Table 3) tested with and without surfactant, the Applicant was asked in an Information
`
`Request dated Jan 10, 2017 to provide the rationale for the proposed SLS concentration
`
` #
`
`In the Applicant’s Response dated Jan 17, 2017 to this Information Request,
`
`the
`
`Applicant stated that
`
`

`

`Since the dissolution of all strengths of_ tablets is fast and not affected by
`SLS concentration, the use of 50 mM NaH2P04 buffer, pH 6.8 without SLS as the
`dissolution medium—for the quality control and stability testing of
`Deflazacort Tablets.
`
`Therefore, on Jan 19, 2017, a teleconference was held between the FDA and Marathon to
`
`discuss the need of including SLS in the dissolution medium, based on the observation of
`
`very rapid dissolution (more than % dissolved in 15 minutes) of the proposed
`
`deflazacort tablets manufactured at
`
`(Table 3) tested without
`
`surfactant.
`
`Reviewer ’s Assessment: The proposed dissolution method (USP apparatus II (Paddle)/50
`
`rpm/500 mL of 50 mM NaI-I2PO4 buffer + 0.3% SLS, pH 6.8) is acceptable.
`
`Although the dissolution medium of 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer at pH 6.8 without
`
`SLS is more adequate for this drug product, the use of the dissolution medium with SLS
`
`was accepted by this Reviewer
`
`Effect of critical quality attributes on the drug release profiles:
`
`Hardness: The Applicant reports that the proposed dissolution method owever, based on Figure 1, more
`
`dissolved in 15 minutes (Page 81, Module 2.7.1).
`
`

`

`
`
`Figure 1. Influence of tablet hardness on the dissolution profile of deflazacort tablets, 18
`
`mg (Page 81, Module 2.7.1).
`
`Particle Size: The Applicant reports that the dissolution method igure 2 supports the discriminating ability of the dissolution method
`
`with respect to API particle size.
`
`
`
`Figure 2. Influence of API particle size on the dissolution profile of deflazacort tablets, 6
`
`mg (Page 82, Module 2.7.1).
`
`Formulation Changes: The Applicant states that the proposed dissolution method is not
`
`discriminating for the relative amount of (Page 83, Module 2.7.1).
`
`

`

`Reviewer’s Assessment: The Applicant reports that the proposed dissolution method is
`
`discriminating for tablet hardness and API’s particle size. However,
`
`the proposed
`
`dissolution method is not discriminating for tablet hardness and the evaluated formulation
`
`changes; but the method is discriminating for the changes in deflazacort particle size
`
`distribution. Overall, this Reviewer considers that the proposed dissolution method is
`
`adequate for quality control purposes.
`
`Dissolution acceptance criterion:
`
`The Applicant’s proposed dissolution acceptance criterion for deflazacort tablets 6 mg,
`18 m , 30 mg, and 36 mg is:
`NLT % of the labeled amount of deflazacort dissolved in 15 minutes.
`
`Table 2. Different deflazacort formulations used for clinical studies mainly manufactured
`
`at
`
`(Page 9, Module 2.7.1 and Page 8, Module 3.2.P.5.4).
`is the commercial manufacturer of deflazacort tablets.
`
`
`
`

`

`Table 3. Dissolution profiles of the proposed Deflazacort Tablets manufactured at
`_, 6 mg (biobatch no.: 3150180), 18 mg (biobatch no.: B150186), 30 mg
`(biobatch no.: B150188), and 36 mg (biobatch no.: B150182) (Pages 13—16, Module
`2
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`

`

`10
`
`
`
`Figure 3. Dissolution profile similarity for Deflazacort Tablets 6 mg, 18 mg, and 30 mg,
`36 mg manufactured a- using the proposed dissolution method (Page 85, Module
`2.7.1).
`
`The dissolution profiles of difi'erent strengths of deflazacort Tablets manufactured at
`_ are similar using the proposed dissolution method (Figure 3) and the rapid
`dissolution profiles for_ tablets (about '% dissolved in 15 minutes) were not
`afi'ected by the SL8 concentrations of- 0.3% (Table 3).
`
`Reviewer’s Assessment: Based on the provided dissolution data, the proposed dissolution
`acceptance criterion (Q='% in 15 minutes) is acceptable.
`
`Dissolution stability data:
`
`The Applicant provided dissolution data at 15- minutes of stability samples using the
`proposed dissolution method in the presence of surfactant SLS (Module 3.2.P.8). There
`
`are no apparent changes in the Applicant’s provided dissolution data of the stability
`
`samples in various storage conditions.
`
`Bridging of Products
`
`Reviewer’s Assessment: Different deflazacort formulations manufactured at different
`
`sites have been used in clinical studies (Figure 4, DP=drug product).
`
`10
`
`

`

`Figure 4. Different deflazacort tablet formulations used in clinical studies (Page 9,
`
`Module 2.7.1 and Page 8, Module 3.2.P.5.4).
`
`

`

`14
`
`proposed drug product (In vivo Characterization Waiver Request, Module 1.12.5). The
`different strengths of deflazacort tablets— (Table 4). The
`dissolution profiles of the 6 mg, 18 mg and 30 mg tablet strengths are comparable
`
`dissolved within the first 15 minutes for all tablet strengths, demonstrating similarity
`
`In addition, more than % of the drug is
`
`Biowaiver Request
`
`Reviewer's Assessment: The Applicant requested a waiver for the requirement to provide
`
`data from in vivo characterization of the 6 mg, 18 mg, and 30 mg tablet strengths of the
`
`

`

`15
`
`between different strengths (Page 2, In vivo Characterization, Module 1.12.5). Based on
`
`the provided data, the biowaiver request for the proposed drug product 6 mg, 18 mg, and
`
`30 mg tablet strengths is granted.
`
`Table 4. Quantitative and qualitative composition of deflazacort tablets 6, 18, 30 and 36
`mg.
`
`Deflazacort
`
`Monohydrate
`Pre-gelatinized
`Com Starch
`Colloidal Silicon
`Dioxide
`
`Magnesium
`Steamte
`
`Quality
`Standard
`
`In4mm
`
`NF
`
`NF
`
`NF
`
`NF
`
`
`
`
`Figure 11. Comparative dissolution profiles of the proposed Deflazacort Tablets 6 mg, 18
`
`mg, 30 mg, and 36 mg using the proposed dissolution method.
`
`REVIEWER’S OVERALL ASSESSMENT
`
`Dissolution Test:
`
`Method: The proposed dissolution method using USP apparatus 1] (Paddle)/50 rpm/500
`mL 50 mM NaH2P04 bufi'er + 0.3% SLS, pH 6.8 is acceptablefor the quality control of
`the proposed immediate release drug product, EMFLAZA’M Tablets 6 m , 18 m , 30 m ,
`
`36 mi as iart oi the batch release and stabilii testini.i
`
`
`
`15
`
`

`

`l6
`
`Acceptance Criterion: The proposed dissolution acceptance criterion ofNLT-% (Q) of
`the labeled amount ofdeflazacort dissolved in 15 minutes for the proposed EMFLAZA’M
`Tablets is acceptable.
`
`Biowaiver Reguest:
`
`The provided pharmacokinetic data, formulation
`the biowaiver request for the
`similar multimedia dissolution profile data support
`proposed drug product 6 mg, 18 mg, and 30 mg tablet strengths and therefore the
`biowaiver is granted.
`
`RECOMMENDA TI0N
`
`From the Biophamtaceutics perspective, NDA 208684 for EMFLAZA’M (deflazacort)
`
`Tablets 6 mg, 18 mg, 30 mg, 36 mg is recommendedfor APPROVAL.
`
`Primary Biopharmaceutics Reviewer Name and Date:
`
`Yang Zhao, Ph.D.
`Biopharmaceutics Primary Reviewer
`Division ofBiopharmaceutics
`Oflice ofNew Drug Products, OPQ
`
`01/23/2016
`
`Secondary Reviewer Name and Date:
`
`I concur with Dr. Yang Zhao 's assessment and recommendation.
`
`Okpo Eradiri, Ph.D.
`Biopharmaceutics Lead (Acting)
`Division ofBiopharmaceutics
`Oflice ofNew Drug Products, OPQ
`
`01/24/201 7
`
`Tertiary Reviewer Name and Date:
`
`I concur with Dr. Yang Zhao 's assessment and recommendation.
`
`Angelica Dorantes, Ph.D.
`Biopharmaceutics Branch Chief(Acting)
`Division ofBiopharmaceutics
`Oflice ofNew Drug Products, OPQ
`
`01/2 7/201 7
`
`l6
`
`

`

`Okponanabofa
`Eradiri
`
`Digitally signed by Okponanabofa Eradiri
`Date: 1/27/2017 02:39:33PM
`GUID: 50bdfe8d00003559ede66be3fd299f65
`
`Yang
`Zhao
`
`Digitally signed by Yang Zhao
`Date: 1/27/2017 01:01:01PM
`GUID: 56f958740001a1f9707b4476d760e12f
`
`8 Page(s) has been Withheld in Full as b4 (CCI/TS) immediately following this page
`
`

`

`MEMORANDUM
`
`DEPARTMENTOFHEALTHANDHUMANSERVICES
`
`PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
`
`FOOD AND DRUG ADlVflNISTRATION
`
`CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH
`
`DATE:
`
`January 24, 2017
`
`FROM:
`
`Raymond P. Frankewich, Ph.D., Review Chemist, OPQ/ONDP/DNDAPI/Branch I
`
`THROUGH: Kasturi Srinivasachar, Ph.D., Branch Chief, OPQ/ONDP/DNDAPI/Branch I
`
`SUBJECT:
`
`Evaluation of Method Verification Results and Conclusions for NDA 208684 &
`
`208685
`
`TO:
`
`NDA 208684 and NDA 208685
`
`Reviews for NDA 208684 and 208685 for Drug Product were finalized on December 8, 2016, and
`for Drug Substance on December 9, 2016. No deficiencies were established for Emflaza®
`(Deflazacort) Tablets (NDA 208684) and Emflazao (Deflazacort) oral suspension (NDA 208685) in
`those reviews.
`
`A Methods Verification Request was submitted for NDA 208684 & 208685 on July 7, 2016.
`Verification was requested for the following analytical procedures:
`m4)
`0 HPLC Assay, Related Substance and Identification Test Method for deflazacort,
`(m4)
`0 HPLC Assay, Related Substance and Identification Test Method for deflazacort,
`0 Deflazacort Assay and Impurities, Identification by HPLC and Identification by UV for
`Deflazacort Tablets
`
`Method Verification Report, dated October 31, 2016, was submitted the same day. The report was
`authored by staff from CDER/OPO/OTR/DPA (DPA). The conclusions of the report were as
`follows:
`
`Thefollowing methods were evaluated and are acceptablefor quality control and regulatory
`purposes:
`
`O)(4)
`
`0 HPLC assay, related substances and identification test methodfor deflazacort
`0 HPLC assay, related substances and identification test methodfor deflazacorl
`Thefollowing methods were evaluated and are acceptable with modificationsfor quality control
`and regulatorypurposes:
`
`(I!) (9
`
`0 Deflazacort assay and impurities, identification by HPLC and identification by UVfor
`deflazacort tablets
`
`It the report it is noted that for the method used for the tablets, an unidentified impurity peak is
`observed at ”(0minutes (RT ”(4’) when one of the standard preparations is chromatographed.
`The level of the impurity was 3%, which exceeds the acceptance criterion for Individual
`
`

`

`Evaluation of MV for NDA 208684 & 208685
`
`Page 2 of 5
`
`Unidentified substances in the Related Substances section of the specification for drug product
`release (which is S 3%). The report indicates that this unidentified impurity peak does appear in
`chromatograms in the validation report provided by the applicant. The following description of the
`unidentified impurity peak is excerpted from the report.
`
`Thefirm does not identijy this peak in Figure 2, page 12. However, it is present as an unknown
`impurity throughout the validation report. Sample solution stability studies on pg. 49-50 ofthe
`validation report show an increase over time at ambient conditions. By 3 hours, the sample is
`twice the specification limit. DPA analyzed the sample within 12 hours ofpreparation at ambient
`conditions. The method does not include a statement about stability at room temperature while the
`analyst is preparing the sample. The only note states “
`sample solutions were shown to be stable
`3 hours when stored in refrigerator, protected by light. ”
`
`The problem appears to be that the unidentified impurity increases significantly following standard
`preparation, indicating the standard preparation is less stable than ideal. It appears that this might be
`addressed by the applicant including a statement in the analytical procedure description to use the
`standard and sample preparations within a particular period of time. It is noted in the experimental
`results that the peak at RT (m4) appeared in the chromatogram of the stande preparation.
`However, in the chromatograms provided in the analytical procedure description provided in sec.
`3.2.P.5.2 of the NDA (and the validation report provided in sec. P.5.3) this peak appears in the
`chromatograms of both the standard and sample preparations.
`
`In addition to this, it is noted that when the method for assay, related substances and identification
`by HPLC for deflazacort
`(”(0 was performed, deflazacort did not dissolve in diluent
`(m4)
`as required in the method. By contrast, the method for assay, related substances and
`identification by HPLC for deflazacort
`0(4) specifies dissolvin deflazacort
`before adding diluent. It was indicated that with the
`M ) method, deflazacort did
`m4). To resolve this issue, DPA
`dissolve
`recommended that instructions be included to dissolve deflazacort
`(mo before adding
`diluent.
`
`(5X4)
`
`Consistent with the recommendations in the report, the following items were sent to the NDA
`applicant (Marathon Pharmaceuticals LLC) in an electronic communication dated January 10, 2017.
`
`It is requested that thefollowing issues regarding the analyticalprocedures usedfor control of
`deflazacort drug substance and Emflaza® (deflazacort) Tablets be addressed. These analytical
`procedures were submitted in NDA 208684for Emflaza® (deflazacort) Tablets.
`
`Regarding the analyticalprocedurefor Deflazacort Assay and I

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket