throbber
CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND
`RESEARCH
`
`
`APPLICATION NUMBER:
`
`209241Orig1s000
`
`
`OTHER REVIEW(S)
`
`

`

`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`209241, Ingrezza (valbenazine) 40mg Capsules
`
`Conduct an in vitro study to assess the induction potential of NBI-136110 on
`CYP2B6 enzyme.
`
`Final Protocol Submission:
`
`Study/Trial Completion:
`Final Report Submission:
`Other:
`
`
` 12/30/2017
`
` 07/30/2018
` 12/30/2018
` MM/DD/YYYY
`
`
`NDA/BLA #
`Product Name:
`
`PMR/PMC Description:
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones:
`(PMR 3177-1)
`
`
`
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a pre-approval
`requirement. Check type below and describe.
` Unmet need
` Life-threatening condition
` Long-term data needed
` Only feasible to conduct post-approval
` Prior clinical experience indicates safety
` Small subpopulation affected
` Theoretical concern
` Other
`
`
`
`NBI-136110 is not an active metabolite of valbenazine. But it is a major circulation moiety. This in-vitro
`study will be used to test induction potential of NBI-136110 on CYP2B6 enzyme and so the study can be
`done post-approval.
`
`
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is a
`FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new safety
`information.”
`
`The Drug Interaction Guidance recommends evaluation of CYP enzyme induction potential for the major
`circulating moieties. The induction potential of NBI-136110 has not been evaluated for CYP2B6. The goal
`is to assess the in-vitro induction potential of NBI-136110 on CYP2B6 enzyme.
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 4/6/2017
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 4082546
`
`

`

`
`
`3. If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`- Which regulation?
` Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
` Animal Efficacy Rule
` Pediatric Research Equity Act
` FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
` Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious risk?
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
` Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: such an analysis will not be sufficient to assess
`or identify a serious risk
`
`
`
` Analysis using pharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: the new pharmacovigilance system that the FDA
`is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus not sufficient
`to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not sufficient to assess
`or identify a serious risk
`
` Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in humans that are not clinical trials as defined
`below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if: a study will not be sufficient to identify or assess a serious
`risk
`
`
`
`
`
` Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines the
`method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human subjects?
`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the study
`or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`In-vitro drug interaction study using human biomaterials
`
`
`Required
` Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study
` Registry studies
` Primary safety study or clinical trial
` Pharmacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to further assess safety
` Thorough Q-T clinical trial
` Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e.g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
` Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
` Pharmacokinetic studies or clinical trials
` Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
` Dosing trials
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 4/6/2017
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 4082546
`
`

`

`Continuation of Question 4
`
`
` Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`
` Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
` Immunogenicity as a marker of safety
` Other (provide explanation)
`
`
`
`
`Agreed upon:
` Quality study without a safety endpoint (e.g., manufacturing, stability)
` Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e.g., natural history of disease, background
`rates of adverse events)
` Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e.g., in another condition, different disease
`severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpart H/E
` Dose-response study or clinical trial performed for effectiveness
` Nonclinical study, not safety-related (specify)
`
` Other
`In-vitro drug interaction study using human biomaterials
`
`
`5. Is the PMR/PMC clear, feasible, and appropriate?
` Does the study/clinical trial meet criteria for PMRs or PMCs?
` Are the objectives clear from the description of the PMR/PMC?
` Has the applicant adequately justified the choice of schedule milestone dates?
` Has the applicant had sufficient time to review the PMRs/PMCs, ask questions, determine feasibility,
`and contribute to the development process?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Check if this form describes a FDAAA PMR that is a randomized controlled clinical trial
`
`If so, does the clinical trial meet the following criteria?
`
` There is a significant question about the public health risks of an approved drug
` There is not enough existing information to assess these risks
` Information cannot be gained through a different kind of investigation
` The trial will be appropriately designed to answer question about a drug’s efficacy and safety, and
` The trial will emphasize risk minimization for participants as the protocol is developed
`
`
`PMR/PMC Development Coordinator:
` This PMR/PMC has been reviewed for clarity and consistency, and is necessary to further refine the
`safety, efficacy, or optimal use of a drug, or to ensure consistency and reliability of drug quality.
`_______________________________________
`(signature line for BLAs)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 4/6/2017
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 4082546
`
`

`

`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`
`NDA/BLA #
`Product Name:
`
`PMR/PMC Description:
`(PMR 3177-2)
`
`209241, Ingrezza (valbenazine) 40mg Capsules
`
`Conduct a pharmacokinetic trial to quantify the impact of CYP2D6 inhibition
`on the exposures of the parent compound and major metabolites, either in the
`presence of a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor or in subjects who are CYP2D6 poor
`metabolizers (PMs)..
`
` 11/30/2017
` 12/30/2018
` 08/30/2019
` MM/DD/YYYY
`
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones: Final Protocol Submission:
`
`Study/Trial Completion:
`
`Final Report Submission:
`
`Other:
`
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a pre-approval
`requirement. Check type below and describe.
` Unmet need
` Life-threatening condition
` Long-term data needed
` Only feasible to conduct post-approval
` Prior clinical experience indicates safety
` Small subpopulation affected
` Theoretical concern
` Other
`
`
`
`The TD patient population who are CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PM) or taking CYP2D6 inhibitors as
`comedication are relatively small. However, increased active metabolite (NBI-98782) exposure is
`anticipated in this group of patients. It is important to optimize dose in this population. It would be
`appropriate to collect data on subjects in the presence of a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor or on subjects who are
`CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PMs) post-approval.
`
`
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is a
`FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new safety
`information.”
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 4/6/2017
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 4082546
`
`

`

`CYP2D6 is considered as a major metabolic enzyme for the active metabolite NBI-98782. However, there
`is no dedicated drug-drug interaction study in the presence of a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor to quantify the
`impact of increase in exposures of NBI-98782 in the current submission. Additionally, the precise-
`magnitude of the difference in exposures of NBI-98782 of CYP2D6 PMs and non-PMs was inconclusive
`because the observed trends varied between significantly higher exposures in a few individuals and no
`difference in exposures.
`
`
`
`3. If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`- Which regulation?
` Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
` Animal Efficacy Rule
` Pediatric Research Equity Act
` FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
` Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious risk?
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
` Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: such an analysis will not be sufficient to assess
`or identify a serious risk
`
`
`
` Analysis using pharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: the new pharmacovigilance system that the FDA
`is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus not sufficient
`to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not sufficient to assess
`or identify a serious risk
`
` Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in humans that are not clinical trials as defined
`below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if: a study will not be sufficient to identify or assess a serious
`risk
`
`
`
`
`
` Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines the
`method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human subjects?
`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the study
`or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`This will be a pharmacokinetic trial to quantify the impact of CYP2D6 inhibition on the
`exposures of the parent compound and major metabolites, either in the presence of a strong
`CYP2D6 inhibitor or in subjects who are CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PMs).
`
`
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 4/6/2017
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 4082546
`
`

`

`Required
` Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study
` Registry studies
` Primary safety study or clinical trial
` Pharmacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to further assess safety
` Thorough Q-T clinical trial
` Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e.g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
` Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
` Pharmacokinetic studies or clinical trials
` Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
` Dosing trials
`Continuation of Question 4
`
`
` Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`
` Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
` Immunogenicity as a marker of safety
` Other (provide explanation)
`
`
`
`
`Agreed upon:
` Quality study without a safety endpoint (e.g., manufacturing, stability)
` Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e.g., natural history of disease, background
`rates of adverse events)
` Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e.g., in another condition, different disease
`severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpart H/E
` Dose-response study or clinical trial performed for effectiveness
` Nonclinical study, not safety-related (specify)
`
` Other
`Study pharmacokinetics in subjects either in the presence of a strong CYP2D6 inhibitor or in
`subjects who are CYP2D6 poor metabolizers (PMs)
`
`
`5. Is the PMR/PMC clear, feasible, and appropriate?
` Does the study/clinical trial meet criteria for PMRs or PMCs?
` Are the objectives clear from the description of the PMR/PMC?
` Has the applicant adequately justified the choice of schedule milestone dates?
` Has the applicant had sufficient time to review the PMRs/PMCs, ask questions, determine feasibility,
`and contribute to the development process?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Check if this form describes a FDAAA PMR that is a randomized controlled clinical trial
`
`If so, does the clinical trial meet the following criteria?
`
` There is a significant question about the public health risks of an approved drug
` There is not enough existing information to assess these risks
` Information cannot be gained through a different kind of investigation
` The trial will be appropriately designed to answer question about a drug’s efficacy and safety, and
` The trial will emphasize risk minimization for participants as the protocol is developed
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 4/6/2017
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 4082546
`
`

`

`
`PMR/PMC Development Coordinator:
` This PMR/PMC has been reviewed for clarity and consistency, and is necessary to further refine the
`safety, efficacy, or optimal use of a drug, or to ensure consistency and reliability of drug quality.
`_______________________________________
`(signature line for BLAs)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 4/6/2017
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 4082546
`
`

`

`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`209241, Ingrezza (valbenazine) 40mg Capsules
`
`Conduct a pharmacokinetic trial to assess exposure differences of the parent
`compound and major metabolites in patients with severe renal impairment and
`matching subjects with normal renal function receiving the same dose.
`
` 12/30/2017
` 12/30/2018
` 08/30/2019
` MM/DD/YYYY
`
`
`NDA/BLA #
`Product Name:
`
`PMR/PMC Description:
`(PMR# 3177-3)
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones: Final Protocol Submission:
`
`Study/Trial Completion:
`
`Final Report Submission:
`
`Other:
`
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a pre-approval
`requirement. Check type below and describe.
` Unmet need
` Life-threatening condition
` Long-term data needed
` Only feasible to conduct post-approval
` Prior clinical experience indicates safety
` Small subpopulation affected
` Theoretical concern
` Other
`
`
`
`The TD patient population with severe renal impairment is relatively small. However, increased active
`metabolite (NBI-98782) exposure is anticipated in patients with severe renal impairment. It is important to
`optimize dose in this population. It would be appropriate to collect data on subjects with renal
`
`impairment post-approval.
`
`
`
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is a
`FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new safety
`information.”
`
`Significant increase in exposure of a CYP2D6 substrate in patients with severe renal impairment has been
`reported. CYP2D6 is considered as a major metabolic enzyme for the active metabolite NBI-98782.
`Exposure change of NBI-98782 has not been assessed in the current program. Lack of this information will
`not ensure a safe use of valbenazine in severe renal impairment patients.
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 4/6/2017
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 4082546
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`
`
`3. If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`- Which regulation?
` Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
` Animal Efficacy Rule
` Pediatric Research Equity Act
` FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
` Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious risk?
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
` Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: such an analysis will not be sufficient to assess
`or identify a serious risk
`
`
`
` Analysis using pharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: the new pharmacovigilance system that the FDA
`is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus not sufficient
`to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not sufficient to assess
`or identify a serious risk
`
` Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in humans that are not clinical trials as defined
`below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if: a study will not be sufficient to identify or assess a serious
`risk
`
`
`
`
`
` Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines the
`method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human subjects?
`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the study
`or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`This will be a pharmacokinetics trial in subjects with severe renal impairment. The study will be
`conducted in subjects with severe renal impairment
`
`
`
`
`Required
` Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study
` Registry studies
` Primary safety study or clinical trial
` Pharmacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to further assess safety
` Thorough Q-T clinical trial
` Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e.g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
` Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
` Pharmacokinetic studies or clinical trials
` Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
` Dosing trials
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 4/6/2017
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 4082546
`
`(b) (4)
`
`

`

`Continuation of Question 4
`
`
` Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`
` Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
` Immunogenicity as a marker of safety
` Other (provide explanation)
`
`
`
`
`Agreed upon:
` Quality study without a safety endpoint (e.g., manufacturing, stability)
` Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e.g., natural history of disease, background
`rates of adverse events)
` Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e.g., in another condition, different disease
`severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpart H/E
` Dose-response study or clinical trial performed for effectiveness
` Nonclinical study, not safety-related (specify)
`
` Other
`Study pharmacokinetics in subjects with severe renal impairment
`
`
`5. Is the PMR/PMC clear, feasible, and appropriate?
` Does the study/clinical trial meet criteria for PMRs or PMCs?
` Are the objectives clear from the description of the PMR/PMC?
` Has the applicant adequately justified the choice of schedule milestone dates?
` Has the applicant had sufficient time to review the PMRs/PMCs, ask questions, determine feasibility,
`and contribute to the development process?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Check if this form describes a FDAAA PMR that is a randomized controlled clinical trial
`
`If so, does the clinical trial meet the following criteria?
`
` There is a significant question about the public health risks of an approved drug
` There is not enough existing information to assess these risks
` Information cannot be gained through a different kind of investigation
` The trial will be appropriately designed to answer question about a drug’s efficacy and safety, and
` The trial will emphasize risk minimization for participants as the protocol is developed
`
`
`PMR/PMC Development Coordinator:
` This PMR/PMC has been reviewed for clarity and consistency, and is necessary to further refine the
`safety, efficacy, or optimal use of a drug, or to ensure consistency and reliability of drug quality.
`_______________________________________
`(signature line for BLAs)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 4/6/2017
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`Reference ID: 4082546
`
`

`

`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`
`NDA/BLA #
`Product Name:
`
`PMR/PMC Description:
`(PMR# 3177-4)
`
`209241, Ingrezza (valbenazine) 40mg Capsules
`
`Evaluate the potential for clinical dependence and withdrawal symptoms
`associated with valbenazine. Implement the following assessments in a
`current or future study in which subjects will receive valbenazine treatment
`(40 and 80 mg/day) for at least four consecutive weeks: Administer
`withdrawal scales, assess for withdrawal-related AEs, and monitor vital signs
`on the last day of treatment, day 1 off-treatment, every other day thereafter for
`the first week, and then 2-3 times weekly for two additional weeks.
`
` 01/31/2018
` 01/31/2019
` 01/31/2020
` MM/DD/YYYY
`
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones: Final Protocol Submission:
`
`Study/Trial Completion:
`
`Final Report Submission:
`
`Other:
`
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a pre-approval
`requirement. Check type below and describe.
` Unmet need
` Life-threatening condition
` Long-term data needed
` Only feasible to conduct post-approval
` Prior clinical experience indicates safety
` Small subpopulation affected
` Theoretical concern
` Other
`
`
`
`This PMR to evaluate for withdrawal symptoms was driven by the lack of evaluation of short-term (e.g.,
`days to weeks) withdrawal symptoms in clinical trials and the theoretical concern based on animal
`findings of increased activity at trough drug levels. It is not a pre-approval requirement because the lack of
`safety findings four weeks post-withdrawal suggests the concerns are not substantial enough to delay
`market entry for the first treatment for tardive dyskinesia.
`
`
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is a
`FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new safety
`information.”
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 4/6/20173/28/2017
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 4082546
`
`

`

`Existing human clinical studies do not assess for the existence of short-term withdrawal symptoms
`following valbenazine discontinuation. Rodent studies found increased activity at trough drug levels. It is
`important to assess whether there are any short-term withdrawal symptoms in humans so appropriate
`information could be added to product labeling.
`
`
`
`3. If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`- Which regulation?
` Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
` Animal Efficacy Rule
` Pediatric Research Equity Act
` FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
` Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious risk?
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
` Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: such an analysis will not be sufficient to assess
`or identify a serious risk
`
`
`
` Analysis using pharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: the new pharmacovigilance system that the FDA
`is required to establish under section 505(k)(3) has not yet been established and is thus not sufficient
`to assess this known serious risk, or has been established but is nevertheless not sufficient to assess
`or identify a serious risk
`
` Study: all other investigations, such as investigations in humans that are not clinical trials as defined
`below (e.g., observational epidemiologic studies), animal studies, and laboratory experiments?
`Do not select the above study type if: a study will not be sufficient to identify or assess a serious
`risk
`
`
`
`
`
` Clinical trial: any prospective investigation in which the sponsor or investigator determines the
`method of assigning investigational product or other interventions to one or more human subjects?
`4. What type of study or clinical trial is required or agreed upon (describe and check type below)? If the study
`or trial will be performed in a subpopulation, list here.
`Visits and assessments will be added to the end of existing clinical studies (NBI-98854-1304 and
`-1402) for patients who have not yet completed study participation.
`
`
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 4/6/20173/28/2017
`
`Page 2 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 4082546
`
`

`

`Required
` Observational pharmacoepidemiologic study
` Registry studies
` Primary safety study or clinical trial
` Pharmacogenetic or pharmacogenomic study or clinical trial if required to further assess safety
` Thorough Q-T clinical trial
` Nonclinical (animal) safety study (e.g., carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicology)
` Nonclinical study (laboratory resistance, receptor affinity, quality study related to safety)
` Pharmacokinetic studies or clinical trials
` Drug interaction or bioavailability studies or clinical trials
` Dosing trials
`Continuation of Question 4
`
`
` Additional data or analysis required for a previously submitted or expected study/clinical trial
`(provide explanation)
`Additional visits and assessments will be included for ongoing clinical studies.
` Meta-analysis or pooled analysis of previous studies/clinical trials
` Immunogenicity as a marker of safety
` Other (provide explanation)
`
`
`
`
`Agreed upon:
` Quality study without a safety endpoint (e.g., manufacturing, stability)
` Pharmacoepidemiologic study not related to safe drug use (e.g., natural history of disease, background
`rates of adverse events)
` Clinical trials primarily designed to further define efficacy (e.g., in another condition, different disease
`severity, or subgroup) that are NOT required under Subpart H/E
` Dose-response study or clinical trial performed for effectiveness
` Nonclinical study, not safety-related (specify)
`
` Other
`
`
`
`5. Is the PMR/PMC clear, feasible, and appropriate?
` Does the study/clinical trial meet criteria for PMRs or PMCs?
` Are the objectives clear from the description of the PMR/PMC?
` Has the applicant adequately justified the choice of schedule milestone dates?
` Has the applicant had sufficient time to review the PMRs/PMCs, ask questions, determine feasibility,
`and contribute to the development process?
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` Check if this form describes a FDAAA PMR that is a randomized controlled clinical trial
`
`If so, does the clinical trial meet the following criteria?
`
` There is a significant question about the public health risks of an approved drug
` There is not enough existing information to assess these risks
` Information cannot be gained through a different kind of investigation
` The trial will be appropriately designed to answer question about a drug’s efficacy and safety, and
` The trial will emphasize risk minimization for participants as the protocol is developed
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 4/6/20173/28/2017
`
`Page 3 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 4082546
`
`

`

`PMR/PMC Development Coordinator:
` This PMR/PMC has been reviewed for clarity and consistency, and is necessary to further refine the
`safety, efficacy, or optimal use of a drug, or to ensure consistency and reliability of drug quality.
`_______________________________________
`(signature line for BLAs)
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 4/6/20173/28/2017
`
`Page 4 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 4082546
`
`

`

`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`
`This template should be completed by the PMR/PMC Development Coordinator and included for each
`PMR/PMC in the Action Package.
`
`
`NDA/BLA #
`Product Name:
`
`PMR/PMC Description:
`(PMC# 3177-5)
`
`209241, Ingrezza (valbenazine) 40mg Capsules
`
`
`Perform a randomized controlled trial to assess whether a higher dose would
`confer additional therapeutic benefit. You may consider a design in which
`subjects with an inadequate response to valbenazine 80 mg are randomized to
`continue the 80 mg dose or receive a higher dose. Depending on findings from
`the clinical pharmacology study evaluating the effect of CYP2D6 inhibition
`on plasma concentrations, CYP2D6 poor metabolizers may be excluded from
`this trial to reduce the risk for exposure-related adverse events such as QT
`prolongation.
`
` 03/2019
` 03/2023
` 03/2024
` MM/DD/YYYY
`
`
`PMR/PMC Schedule Milestones: Final Protocol Submission:
`
`Trial Completion:
`
`Final Report Submission:
`
`Other:
`
`
`1. During application review, explain why this issue is appropriate for a PMR/PMC instead of a pre-approval
`requirement. Check type below and describe.
` Unmet need
` Life-threatening condition
` Long-term data needed
` Only feasible to conduct post-approval
` Prior clinical experience indicates safety
` Small subpopulation affected
` Theoretical concern
` Other
`
`
`
`The Clinical Pharmacology and Clinical reviews both concluded that there may be a potential for an
`improved benefit/risk ratio with a higher dose of valbenazine in some patients. It would not be reasonable
`to institute this as a pre-approval requirement, as it would delay market entry for the first treatment for
`tardive dyskinesia.
`
`
`2. Describe the particular review issue and the goal of the study/clinical trial. If the study/clinical trial is a
`FDAAA PMR, describe the risk. If the FDAAA PMR is created post-approval, describe the “new safety
`information.”
`
`PMR/PMC Development Template
`
`Last Updated 4/6/2017
`
`Page 1 of 4
`
`Reference ID: 4082546
`
`

`

`Clinical pharmacology dose/exposure/response analyses, a clear dose-response relationship for response to
`40 mg vs. 80 mg daily, and the existence of a substantial proportion of patients with residual TD symptoms
`suggests trial of a higher dose may be warranted for evaluating the benefit/risk ratio.
`
`
`
`3. If the study/clinical trial is a PMR, check the applicable regulation.
`If not a PMR, skip to 4.
`- Which regulation?
` Accelerated Approval (subpart H/E)
` Animal Efficacy Rule
` Pediatric Research Equity Act
` FDAAA required safety study/clinical trial
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, does it: (check all that apply)
` Assess a known serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Assess signals of serious risk related to the use of the drug?
` Identify an unexpected serious risk when available data indicate the potential for a serious risk?
`
`- If the PMR is a FDAAA safety study/clinical trial, will it be conducted as:
` Analysis of spontaneous postmarketing adverse events?
`Do not select the above study/clinical trial type if: such an analysis will not be sufficient to assess
`or identify a serious risk
`
`
`
` Analysis using pharmacovigilance system?
`Do not select

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket