throbber
Case 6:21-cr-00103-LSC-JHE Document 1 Filed 04/27/21 Page 1 of 15
`
`FILED
`
` 2021 Apr-28 AM 10:26
`U.S. DISTRICT COURT
`N.D. OF ALABAMA
`
`PFE/LCP/DBL
`GJ # 12 (May 2021)
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
`NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
`JASPER DIVISION
`
`
`UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
`
`v.
`
`PHILLIP ANTHONY MINGA
`
`
`
`CASE NO. _____
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1343, 1347,
`)
`) and 1349
`
`
`
`
`INDICTMENT
`
`The Grand Jury charges that:
`
`
`
`At all times relevant to this Indictment:
`
`I.
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`The Medicare Program and Medicare Part D
`The Medicare Program (“Medicare”) is a federal health-insurance
`1.
`
`program that provides medical benefits, items, and services to beneficiaries: (1) aged
`
`65 and older, (2) under 65 with certain disabilities, and (3) of all ages with end-stage
`
`renal disease (permanent kidney failure requiring dialysis or a kidney transplant).
`
`2.
`
`The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) is an agency
`
`of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and is a federal government
`
`body responsible for the administration of Medicare.
`
`
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cr-00103-LSC-JHE Document 1 Filed 04/27/21 Page 2 of 15
`
`3.
`
`The Medicare programs cover different types of benefits that are
`
`separated into different program parts.
`
`4. Medicare Part D, also called the Medicare prescription drug benefit, is
`
`a program that covers prescription drugs. Medicare beneficiaries obtain Part D
`
`benefits in two ways: (a) by joining a prescription drug plan, which covers only
`
`prescription drugs, or (b) by joining a Medicare Advantage Plan, which covered both
`
`prescription drugs and medical services (collectively, “the Medicare Plans”). The
`
`Medicare Plans are operated by private companies, often referred to as drug plan
`
`sponsors, that are approved by Medicare.
`
`5. Medicare and individual Medicare drug plan sponsors are “health care
`
`benefit programs,” as defined by Title 18, United States Code, Section 24(b).
`
`6.
`
`A pharmacy can participate in the Medicare Part D program by entering
`
`into an agreement: (a) directly with a prescription drug plan; (b) with one or more
`
`Pharmacy Benefit Managers (“PBMs”); or (c) with a Pharmacy Services
`
`Administration Organization (“PSAO”). A PBM acts on behalf of one or more
`
`prescription drug plans. Through a prescription drug plan’s PBM, a pharmacy can
`
`join a prescription drug plan’s network. A PSAO contracts with PBMs on behalf of
`
`the pharmacy.
`
`7.
`
`CMS assigns pharmacies a national provider identifier number (“NPI”).
`
`
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cr-00103-LSC-JHE Document 1 Filed 04/27/21 Page 3 of 15
`
`A pharmacy dispensing medications to a beneficiary uses its assigned NPI number
`
`when submitting a claim for reimbursement under Medicare Part D.
`
`8.
`
`Typically, a beneficiary enrolled in a Medicare prescription drug plan
`
`obtains prescription medications from a pharmacy enrolled in the beneficiary’s
`
`prescription drug plan. After filling a beneficiary’s prescription, the pharmacy
`
`submits the claim electronically either directly to a prescription drug plan or to a
`
`PBM that represents the prescription drug plan. The pharmacy provides, among
`
`other things, the beneficiary’s identification number and the pharmacy’s NPI
`
`number with the claim. Then, the prescription drug plan or PBM, either directly or
`
`indirectly, reimburses the pharmacy for the claim.
`
`II. Exclusion from Medicare
`
`9.
`
`The Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector
`
`General (HHS OIG) has the authority to exclude medical providers and related
`
`individuals from Medicare if they fail to disclose required material information.
`
`10. Once excluded, an individual may not serve in an executive or
`
`leadership role at a provider that furnishes items or services payable by Medicare.
`
`Also, an excluded individual may generally not provide other types of administrative
`
`and management services, such as information technology services and support,
`
`strategic planning, billing and accounting, staff training, and human resources.
`
`
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cr-00103-LSC-JHE Document 1 Filed 04/27/21 Page 4 of 15
`
`11. HHS OIG maintains a List of Excluded Individuals/Entities that
`
`identifies all currently excluded individuals and entities. HHS OIG recommends
`
`that healthcare entities routinely check the List of Excluded Individuals/Entities to
`
`ensure that new hires and current employees are not on it because employers risk
`
`liability for employing excluded individuals. Access to this list is free and available
`
`online.
`
`III. Defendant MINGA
`
`12. Defendant PHILLIP ANTHONY MINGA is a resident of Mississippi
`
`and has operated pharmacies in Alabama, Mississippi, and Arkansas.
`
`A. Defendant MINGA’s Prior Criminal Conviction
`
`13. On May 27, 2008, defendant MINGA was charged in federal district
`
`court in the Northern District of Mississippi with wire fraud related to the sale of
`
`insurance, in Case Number: 08-cr-00052-MPM-DAS.
`
`14. On April 5, 2010, defendant MINGA entered a guilty plea to the charge
`
`of wire fraud.
`
`15. On November 18, 2010, defendant MINGA was sentenced by the court
`
`to three years’ probation.
`
`B. Defendant MINGA’s Exclusion from Medicare
`
`16. At the time defendant MINGA was charged, he had managing control
`
`
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cr-00103-LSC-JHE Document 1 Filed 04/27/21 Page 5 of 15
`
`of a durable medical equipment supplier called Medpoint. Medpoint, at that time,
`
`was operating in Amory, Mississippi and was enrolled in Medicare.
`
`17. After defendant MINGA pled guilty and was sentenced, neither he nor
`
`anyone else with Medpoint updated Medpoint’s Medicare enrollment information to
`
`notify CMS of defendant MINGA’s conviction, which they were required to do.
`
`18. Following an investigation by HHS OIG, on October 17, 2016,
`
`defendant MINGA entered into an Exclusion Agreement with HHS OIG in which
`
`defendant MINGA agreed to an exclusion from Medicare for ten years.
`
`19. The exclusion agreement provided that Medicare would not pay claims
`
`submitted by anyone who employed defendant MINGA in a management or
`
`administrative role.
`
`20. The exclusion agreement further provided that defendant MINGA
`
`would hold Medicare harmless for any financial responsibility for claims submitted
`
`by any entity that employed him in a management or administrative role.
`
`21. The exclusion agreement
`
`further stated defendant MINGA
`
`“understands that violations of the conditions of exclusion may subject him to
`
`criminal prosecution.”
`
`22.
`
`In executing
`
`the exclusion agreement, defendant MINGA
`
`acknowledged having knowledge of its contents and that he entered into it
`
`
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cr-00103-LSC-JHE Document 1 Filed 04/27/21 Page 6 of 15
`
`voluntarily and with advice of counsel.
`
`Count One
`[Conspiracy: 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (18 U.S.C. § 1343 and 1347)]
`
`23. Paragraphs 1 to 22 of this Indictment are fully incorporated as though
`
`set forth herein.
`
`THE CONSPIRACY
`
`24. Beginning at least in or about October 2016 and continuing until at least
`
`in or about September 2019, the exact dates being unknown, within Walker County
`
`in the Northern District of Alabama, and elsewhere, defendant PHILLIP
`
`ANTHONY MINGA knowingly and willfully conspired, combined, and agreed
`
`with those known and unknown to the Grand Jury:
`
`to execute and attempt to execute a scheme and artifice to defraud
`a)
`health care benefit programs affecting commerce, as defined in Title 18,
`United States Code, Section 24(b), that is, the Medicare program and
`Medicare drug plan sponsors, to obtain by means of materially false and
`fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, money and property
`owned by, and under the custody and control of, said health care benefit
`programs, in connection with the delivery and payment for health care
`benefits, items, and services in violation of Title 18, United States Code,
`Section 1347; and
`
`to devise and intend to devise a scheme and artifice to defraud the
`b)
`Medicare program and Medicare drug plan sponsors, and others, and to obtain
`money and property belonging to others by means of materially false and
`fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises by use of interstate wire
`transmissions, in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1343.
`
`
`OBJECT OF THE CONSPIRACY
`6
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cr-00103-LSC-JHE Document 1 Filed 04/27/21 Page 7 of 15
`
`25.
`
`It was the object of the conspiracy for defendant PHILLIP
`
`ANTHONY MINGA and other co-conspirators known and unknown to the grand
`
`jury to unlawfully enrich themselves by concealing from Medicare and Medicare
`
`drug plan sponsors defendant MINGA’s ownership interests and managerial roles
`
`in multiple pharmacies and by submitting claims to Medicare and Medicare drug
`
`plan sponsors for reimbursement to which those pharmacies were not entitled due to
`
`defendant MINGA’s involvement with the pharmacies.
`
`MANNER AND MEANS OF THE CONSPIRACY
`
`26.
`
`It was a part of the conspiracy that defendant MINGA, once excluded
`
`from Medicare, continued to bill Medicare and Medicare drug plan sponsors by
`
`submitting and causing the submission of claims under NPI numbers registered to
`
`multiple pharmacies that defendant MINGA had an ownership and managerial
`
`interest in, including Bowie’s Priority Care Pharmacy, LLC, Vickers Pharmacy, and
`
`others.
`
`27.
`
`It was a further part of the conspiracy that defendant MINGA and other
`
`co-conspirators failed to disclose to Medicare, Medicare drug plan sponsors, and
`
`other regulatory authorities that defendant MINGA had ownership interests and
`
`managerial roles in these pharmacies.
`
`
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cr-00103-LSC-JHE Document 1 Filed 04/27/21 Page 8 of 15
`
`28.
`
`It was a further part of the conspiracy that the defendant MINGA and
`
`other co-conspirators used electronic claims systems to submit claims to Medicare
`
`and Medicare drug plan sponsors by interstate wire transmission.
`
`29.
`
`It was a further part of the conspiracy that in violation of his exclusion
`
`agreement, from October 2016 to September 2019, defendant MINGA caused
`
`Medicare and Medicare drug plan sponsors to pay millions of dollars in total to
`
`multiple pharmacies, including Bowie’s Priority Care Pharmacy, LLC and Vickers
`
`Pharmacy, for items, including administrative and managerial services, that
`
`defendant MINGA furnished or ordered while serving as owner, employee,
`
`administrator, and in other capacities at these pharmacies.
`
`All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 1349.
`
`Counts 2 through 5
`[Health Care Fraud: 18 U.S.C. § 1347]
`
`30. Paragraphs 1 to 22 of this Indictment are fully incorporated as though
`
`set forth herein.
`
`31. Beginning at least in or about October 2016 and continuing until at least
`
`in or about September 2019, the exact dates being unknown, within Walker County
`
`in the Northern District of Alabama, and elsewhere, defendant PHILLIP
`
`ANTHONY MINGA did knowingly and willfully execute and attempt to execute a
`
`scheme and artifice to defraud health care benefit programs affecting commerce, as
`8
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cr-00103-LSC-JHE Document 1 Filed 04/27/21 Page 9 of 15
`
`defined in Title 18, United States Code, Section 24(b), that is, Medicare and
`
`Medicare drug plan sponsors, and others, and to obtain, by means of materially false
`
`and fraudulent pretenses, representations, and promises, money and property owned
`
`by and under the custody and control of these and other health care benefit programs,
`
`in connection with the delivery of and payment for health care benefits, items, and
`
`services.
`
`PURPOSE OF THE SCHEME AND ARTIFICE
`
`32. Paragraph 25 of this Indictment is realleged and incorporated by
`
`reference as though fully set forth herein as the description of the purpose of the
`
`health care fraud scheme and artifice.
`
`THE SCHEME AND ARTIFICE
`
`33. Paragraphs 26 to 29 of this Indictment are hereby incorporated by
`
`reference as though fully set forth herein, with the words “scheme and artifice”
`
`replacing “conspiracy” in the first sentence of each paragraph.
`
`ACTS IN EXECUTION OF THE SCHEME AND ARTIFICE
`
`34. On or about the dates set forth below for each Count listed in the table
`
`below, each such date constituting a separate count of this Indictment, in Walker
`
`County, within the Northern District of Alabama, and elsewhere, defendant
`
`PHILLIP ANTHONY MINGA, in connection with the delivery of and payment
`
`
`
`9
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cr-00103-LSC-JHE Document 1 Filed 04/27/21 Page 10 of 15
`
`for health care benefits, items, and services, did knowingly and willfully execute and
`
`attempt to execute the above-described scheme and artifice to defraud health care
`
`benefit programs affecting commerce, that is, Medicare and Medicare drug plan
`
`sponsors, and to obtain, by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses,
`
`representations, and promises (including that the prescriptions were medically
`
`necessary), money and property owned by, and under the custody and control of,
`
`Medicare and Medicare drug plan sponsors.
`
`35. The allegations of paragraphs 31 to 34 above are realleged for each of
`
`Counts 2 through 5 below, as though fully set forth therein, when, on or about the
`
`dates set forth below in the table below, defendant PHILLIP ANTHONY MINGA
`
`did cause the submission of prescription payment claims through certain pharmacies
`
`that Minga managed or controlled to Medicare and Medicare drug plan sponsors,
`
`and cause the payment of these prescription claims by Medicare and Medicare drug
`
`plan sponsors (with the Medicare drug plan sponsor listed in a parenthetical) of the
`
`following:
`
`Count
`
`RX #
`
`Patient
`Initials
`
`Healthcare Benefit
`Program
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`
`
`6090016
`
`6106146
`
`R.F.
`
`R.F.
`
`6137846
`
`H.A.
`
`Medicare
`(Excellus Health Plan)
`Medicare
`(Excellus Health Plan)
`Medicare
`(CareSource)
`10
`
`Approx.
`Date
`Submitted
`February
`17, 2017
`April 20,
`2017
`August 28,
`2017
`
`Pharmacy
`
`Vickers
`Pharmacy
`Vickers
`Pharmacy
`Vickers
`Pharmacy
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cr-00103-LSC-JHE Document 1 Filed 04/27/21 Page 11 of 15
`
`Count
`
`RX #
`
`Patient
`Initials
`
`Healthcare Benefit
`Program
`
`5
`
`760031173 M.T.
`
`Medicare
`(Care Improvement Plus)
`
`Approx.
`Date
`Submitted
`January 24,
`2018
`
`Pharmacy
`
`Bowie’s
`Priority Care
`Pharmacy, LLC
`
`
`All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1347 and 2.
`
`Counts 6 through 8
`[Wire Fraud: 18 U.S.C. § 1343]
`
`36. Paragraphs 1 to 22 of the Introduction to this Indictment are fully
`
`incorporated as though set forth herein.
`
`37. Beginning at least in or about October 2016 and continuing until at least
`
`in or about September 2019, the exact dates being unknown, within Walker County
`
`in the Northern District of Alabama, and elsewhere, defendant PHILLIP
`
`ANTHONY MINGA, having devised and intending to devise a scheme and artifice
`
`to defraud, and for obtaining money and property by means of false and fraudulent
`
`pretenses, representations, and promises, knowingly did transmit and cause to be
`
`transmitted by means of wire, radio, and television communication in interstate and
`
`foreign commerce, writings, signs, signals, pictures, and sounds, for the purposes of
`
`executing such scheme and artifice, that is, defendant PHILLIP ANTHONY
`
`MINGA caused to be transmitted by means of wire prescription claims to Medicare
`
`and Medicare drug plan sponsors.
`
`
`
`11
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cr-00103-LSC-JHE Document 1 Filed 04/27/21 Page 12 of 15
`
`PURPOSE OF THE SCHEME AND ARTIFICE
`
`38. Paragraph 25 of this Indictment is realleged and incorporated by
`
`reference as though fully set forth herein as the description of the purpose of the mail
`
`fraud scheme and artifice.
`
`THE SCHEME AND ARTIFICE
`
`39. Paragraphs 26 to 29 of this Indictment are hereby incorporated by
`
`reference as though fully set forth herein, with the words “scheme and artifice”
`
`replacing “conspiracy” in the first sentence of each paragraph.
`
`THE WIRES
`
`40. The allegations of paragraphs 37 to 39 of this Indictment are realleged
`
`as though fully set forth herein.
`
`41. On or about the dates specified in the table below, each such date
`
`constituting a separate count of the Indictment, in Walker County, within the
`
`Northern District of Alabama, and elsewhere, for the purpose of executing and
`
`attempting to execute the above-described scheme and artifice to defraud and to
`
`obtain money by means of materially false and fraudulent pretenses, representations,
`
`and promises, defendant PHILLIP ANTHONY MINGA knowingly transmitted or
`
`caused to be transmitted by means of wire, in interstate commerce, writings, signs,
`
`and signals for the purpose of executing the above scheme or artifice:
`
`
`
`12
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cr-00103-LSC-JHE Document 1 Filed 04/27/21 Page 13 of 15
`
`Count
`
`RX #
`
`Patient
`Initials
`
`Healthcare Benefit
`Program
`
`6143018
`
`J.S.
`
`Medicare
`(UnitedHealthcare)
`
`Approx.
`Date
`Submitted
`June 6,
`2017
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`
`
`
`
`Pharmacy
`
`Bowie’s Priority
`Care Pharmacy,
`LLC
`Bowie’s Priority
`Care Pharmacy,
`LLC
`Bowie’s Priority
`Care Pharmacy,
`LLC
`
`760032109 W.H. Medicare
`(UnitedHealthcare)
`
`February
`22, 2018
`
`760032109 W.H. Medicare
`(UnitedHealthcare)
`
`May 1,
`2018
`
`
`All in violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 1343 and 2.
`
`
`
`13
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cr-00103-LSC-JHE Document 1 Filed 04/27/21 Page 14 of 15
`
`NOTICE OF FORFEITURE
`
`The allegations in Count One through Eight of this Indictment are
`
`1.
`
`hereby re-alleged and incorporated by reference for the purpose of alleging forfeiture
`
`pursuant to Title 18, United States Code, Section 982(a)(7).
`
`2.
`
`Upon conviction of the offenses set forth in Counts One through Eight
`
`of this Indictment, the defendant
`
`PHILLIP ANTHONY MINGA,
`
`shall forfeit to the United States of America, pursuant to Title 18, United States
`
`Code, Section 982(a)(7), any property, real or personal, that constitutes or is derived,
`
`directly or indirectly, from gross proceeds traceable to the commission of the health
`
`care fraud offenses charged in Counts One through Eight of this Indictment.
`
`3.
`
`The property to be forfeited includes but is not limited to a forfeiture
`
`money judgment.
`
`4.
`
`If any of the property described above, as a result of any act or omission
`
`of the defendant:
`
`a. cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;
`
`b. has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party;
`
`c. has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the court;
`
`d. has been substantially diminished in value; or
`
`
`
`14
`
`

`

`Case 6:21-cr-00103-LSC-JHE Document 1 Filed 04/27/21 Page 15 of 15
`
`e. has been commingled with other property which cannot be
`
`divided without difficulty,
`
`the United States of America shall be entitled to forfeiture of substitute property
`
`pursuant to Title 21, United States Code, Section 853(p), as incorporated by Title
`
`28, United States Code, Section 2461(c).
`
`
`
`All pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(7).
`
`A TRUE BILL
`
`
`/s/ Electronic Signature
`FOREPERSON OF THE GRAND JURY
`
`
`PRIM F. ESCALONA
`United States Attorney
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`/s/ Electronic Signature
`LLOYD C. PEEPLES, III
`Assistant United States Attorney
`
`/s/ Electronic Signature
`DON B. LONG
`Assistant United States Attorney
`
`15
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket