throbber
Case 2:20-cv-00575-KD-B Document 1 Filed 11/30/20 Page 1 of 7 PageID #: 1
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA
`NORTHERN DIVISION
`
`CIVIL ACTION NO.:
`20-575
`JURY DEMAND
`
`))
`
`)
`)
`)
`)
`
`))
`
`)
`
`COMPLAINT
`
`SAMERA MOHAMMED,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`FOSTER FARMS,
`
`Defendant.
`
`I.
`
`JURISDICTION
`
`1.
`
`Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §12117, 28 U.S.C. §1331.
`
`The jurisdiction of this court is invoked to secure protection of and redress deprivation of rights
`
`secured by the Americans With Disabilities of Act 1990, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 12101, et
`
`seq. providing for injunctive and other relief against employment discrimination and retaliation.
`
`2.
`
`Plaintiff has fulfilled all conditions precedent to the institution of this action under
`
`42 U.S.C. §12117. Plaintiff timely filed her charge of discrimination within 180 days of occurrence
`
`of the last discriminatory act. Plaintiff also timely filed this complaint within ninety (90) days of the
`
`receipt of a Notice of Right To Sue issued by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
`
`Plaintiff received a “cause” finding from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-00575-KD-B Document 1 Filed 11/30/20 Page 2 of 7 PageID #: 2
`
`II.
`
`PARTIES
`
`3.
`
`Plaintiff, Samera Mohammed (hereinafter “Mohammed” or “Plaintiff”) is a citizen
`
`of the United States and a resident of Monroe, North Carolina. At all time relevant to this lawsuit,
`
`the plaintiff was employed at one of the defendant’s locations in Marengo County, Alabama.
`
`4.
`
`Defendant, Foster Farms (hereinafter “Foster Farms” or “Defendant”) is an employer
`
`pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §12111(5) and is doing business in Marengo County, Alabama.
`
`III.
`
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`
`5.
`
`The plaintiff adopts and incorporate by reference the allegations contained in
`
`paragraphs 1-4 above.
`
`6.
`
` Plaintiff suffers from diabetes which substantially limits the function of her
`
`endocrine system which is a major life activity under the ADAAA.
`
`7.
`
`Plaintiff was hired by Defendant around November 7, 2018. On the Medical History
`
`Form that she was required to complete, Plaintiff informed Defendant of her disability by writing
`
`that she was currently taking insulin. Plaintiff also spoke with one of Defendant’s office employees
`
`that day and informed them that she had a doctors appointment on Friday, November 9, 2018.
`
`8.
`
`At Plaintiff’s November 9th doctors appointment, she was sent to the hospital in
`
`Grove Hill for tests. She sent an email to Defendant’s employee, Tyler Pinegar at 1:42 p.m.,
`
`informing him that she had previously told someone at Foster Farms about the doctors appointment
`
`and that she had been sent to the hospital. Plaintiff also provided a copy of a doctor’s excuse
`
`attached to her email to Pinegar.
`
`9.
`
`At 1:46 p.m. on November 9th, Pinegar replied to Plaintiff’s email, telling her that she
`
`had spoken with the HR Manager, Amy, and that he had also heard from the guard, who Plaintiff had
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-00575-KD-B Document 1 Filed 11/30/20 Page 3 of 7 PageID #: 3
`
`called to inform about her absence. Pinegar stated that he was informing her supervisor and
`
`scanning the excuse into the personnel file.
`
`10.
`
`On November 15, 2018, Plaintiff was again ill because of her diabetes. She sent
`
`Pinegar an email at 11:34 p.m., informing him that she had called in to work earlier that day, but no
`
`one answered. She told him that her blood sugar levels were high which caused her to be sick. She
`
`told him that she had a doctors note and that the doctor had also provided an accommodation request
`
`for her to provide her employer. Plaintiff attached both of those documents to her email.
`
`11.
`
`On Friday, November 16, 2019, at 8:58 a.m., Pinegar responded with an email stating
`
`that Foster Farms did not “do accommodations,” and that Plaintiff had been told she could not miss
`
`any more time. Pinegar then told Plaintiff that “we’re going to have to end your employment with
`
`us.”
`
`IV.
`
`CAUSES OF ACTION
`
`A.
`
`TERMINATION - AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT - (FAILURE TO
`ACCOMMODATE)
`
`12.
`
`The plaintiff adopts and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in
`
`paragraphs 1-11 above.
`
`13.
`
`Plaintiff is a person with a disability in that she has a physical impairment which
`
`substantially limits one or more of her major life activities. 42 U.S.C. §12102. Furthermore, she
`
`is a qualified individual with a disability in that she has a record of impairment and is perceived as
`
`having an impairment which substantially limits one or more major life activities in accordance with
`
`42 U.S.C. §12102. As stated, the Defendant is an employer in accordance with 42 U.S.C. §12111(5).
`
`14.
`
`Despite the plaintiff’s disability, she is and was able to perform the essential functions
`
`3
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-00575-KD-B Document 1 Filed 11/30/20 Page 4 of 7 PageID #: 4
`
`of the her position with Defendant with or without accommodations.
`
`15.
`
`The defendant failed to accommodate Plaintiff’s disability and failed to engage in the
`
`interactive process with Plaintiff, telling her that the company did not “do accommodations” and
`
`thereafter terminating Plaintiff’s employment. Defendant’s actions were intentional, malicious, and
`
`with recklessly indifferent to Plaintiff’s federally protected rights.
`
`16.
`
`The plaintiff seeks to redress the wrongs alleged herein in this suit for lost wages, an
`
`injunctive and a declaratory judgment. The plaintiff is now suffering and will continue to suffer
`
`irreparable injury from the defendant’s unlawful policies and practices as set forth herein unless
`
`enjoined by this Court.
`
`17.
`
`As a result of the defendant’s actions, the plaintiff has suffered extreme harm,
`
`including, but not limited to, loss of employment opportunities, denial of wages, compensation and
`
`other benefits and conditions of employment. Additionally, the plaintiff has suffered injury,
`
`including pain, humiliation, mental anguish and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life.
`
`B.
`
`- AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
`TERMINATION
`(DISCRIMINATION BECAUSE OF DISABILITY)
`
`18.
`
`The plaintiff adopts and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in
`
`paragraphs 1-17 above.
`
`19.
`
`Plaintiff is a person with a disability in that she has a physical impairment which
`
`substantially limits one or more of her major life activities. 42 U.S.C. §12102. Furthermore, she
`
`is a qualified individual with a disability in that he has a record of impairment and is perceived as
`
`having an impairment which substantially limits one or more major life activities in accordance with
`
`42 U.S.C. §12102. As stated, the Defendant is an employer in accordance with 42 U.S.C. §12111(5).
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-00575-KD-B Document 1 Filed 11/30/20 Page 5 of 7 PageID #: 5
`
`20.
`
`Despite the plaintiff’s disability, she is and was able to perform the essential functions
`
`of the position of her position with or without an accommodation.
`
`21.
`
`The defendant intentionally, maliciously, and with reckless indifference to Plaintiff’s
`
`federally protected rights terminated the plaintiff because of her actual or perceived disability and/or
`
`her record of a disability.
`
`22.
`
`The plaintiff seeks to redress the wrongs alleged herein in this suit for lost wages, and
`
`injunctive and a declaratory relief. The plaintiff is now suffering and will continue to suffer
`
`irreparable injury from the defendant’s unlawful policies and practices as set forth herein unless
`
`enjoined by this Court.
`
`23.
`
`As a result of the defendant’s actions, the plaintiff has suffered extreme harm,
`
`including, but not limited to, loss of employment opportunities, denial of wages, compensation and
`
`other benefits and conditions of employment. Additionally, the plaintiff has suffered injury,
`
`including pain, humiliation, mental anguish and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life.
`
`C.
`
`24.
`
`RETALIATORY TERMINATION
`
`The plaintiff adopts and incorporate by reference the allegations contained in
`
`paragraphs 1-23 above.
`
`25.
`
`Although Plaintiff informed Defendant of her disability and requested an
`
`accommodation, the Defendant failed to accommodate the plaintiff and failed to engage in the
`
`interactive process.
`
`26.
`
`The defendant intentionally, maliciously, and with reckless indifference and
`
`terminated the plaintiff in retaliation for her seeking an accommodation for her disability.
`
`27.
`
`The plaintiff seeks to redress the wrongs alleged herein in this suit for lost wages, an
`
`5
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-00575-KD-B Document 1 Filed 11/30/20 Page 6 of 7 PageID #: 6
`
`injunctive and a declaratory judgment. The plaintiff is now suffering and will continue to suffer
`
`irreparable injury from the defendant’s unlawful policies and practices as set forth herein unless
`
`enjoined by this Court.
`
`28.
`
`As a result of the defendant’s actions, the plaintiff has suffered extreme harm,
`
`including, but not limited to, loss of employment opportunities, denial of wages, compensation and
`
`other benefits and conditions of employment. Additionally, the plaintiff has suffered injury,
`
`including pain, humiliation, mental anguish and suffering and loss of enjoyment of life.
`
`V.
`
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`
`WHEREFORE, the plaintiff respectfully prays that this Court assume jurisdiction of this
`
`action and after trial:
`
`1.
`
`Issue a declaratory judgment that the employment policies, practices, procedures,
`
`conditions and customs of the defendant are violative of the rights of the plaintiff as secured by the
`
`Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12102.
`
`2.
`
`Grant the plaintiff a permanent injunction enjoining the defendant, its agents,
`
`successors, employees, attorneys and those acting in concert with the defendant and at the
`
`defendant’s request from continuing to violate the Act of Congress known as the Americans with
`
`Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. 12102.
`
`3.
`
`Enter an Order requiring the defendant to make the plaintiff whole by awarding him
`
`the position(s) he would have had occupied in the absence of disability discrimination and
`
`retaliation, back-pay (plus interest), declaratory and injunctive relief, liquidated damages,
`
`compensatory and punitive damages, lost seniority, benefits, and lost pension.
`
`4.
`
`The plaintiff further prays for such other relief and benefits as the cause of justice may
`
`6
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-00575-KD-B Document 1 Filed 11/30/20 Page 7 of 7 PageID #: 7
`
`require, including, but not limited to, an award of costs, attorney’s fees and expenses.
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`/s/ Kevin W. Jent
`Kevin W. Jent
`Counsel for the Plaintiff
`
`OF COUNSEL:
`
`WIGGINS, CHILDS, PANTAZIS,
`FISHER & GOLDFARB, LLC
`The Kress Building
`301 19th Street North
`Birmingham, Alabama 35203
`205/314-0500
`205/254-1500 (fax)
`
`PLAINTIFF DEMANDS A TRIAL BY JURY ON ALL
`TRIABLE ISSUES.
`
`/s/ Kevin W. Jent
`OF COUNSEL
`
`DEFENDANT’S ADDRESS TO BE SERVED
`VIA CERTIFIED MAIL:
`
`Foster Farms, Inc.
`c/o C T Corporation System
`2 North Jackson Street, Suite 605
`Montgomery, AL 36104
`
`7
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket