throbber
Case 2:17-cv-02948-AG-JCG Document 46 Filed 04/15/22 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:596
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`SOUTHERN DIVISION
`
`XR COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, dba VIVATO
`TECHNOLOGIES,
`
`Case No. 8:17-CV-02948-DOC
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`v.
`
`FINAL JUDGMENT
`
`ASUS COMPUTER INTERNATIONAL,
`ASUSTeK Computer, Inc.
`
`Defendant.
`
`

`

`Case 2:17-cv-02948-AG-JCG Document 46 Filed 04/15/22 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:597
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Case No. 2:17-CV-02948 is a patent infringement action brought by Plaintiff XR
`
`Communications, LLC, dba Vivato Technologies (“Vivato”) against Defendant ASUS Computer
`
`International and ASUSTeK Computer, Inc. (“ASUS”).
`
`The Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338.
`
`The claims asserted by Vivato against ASUS in this case relate to three patents-in-suit: U.S.
`
`Patent No. 7,062,296 (the “’296 patent”); U.S. Patent No. 7,729,728 (the “’728 patent”); and U.S.
`
`Patent No. 6,611,231 (the “’231 patent”).
`
`All asserted claims from the ’296 patent and the ’728 patent were cancelled by the U.S. Patent
`
`Office pursuant to Final Written Decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in Inter Partes Review
`
`proceedings IPR2018-00725, IPR2018-00726, IPR2018-00763, IPR2018-00764, IPR2018-01017, and
`
`IPR2018-01018. Therefore, all claims relating to those two patents are hereby dismissed.
`
`On January 4, 2022, this Court entered an order (as Dkt. No. 274 in XR Communications, LLC
`
`v. D-Link Systems, Inc. et al., Case No. 8:17-cv-00596-DOC-JDE (Lead Case)) granting ASUS’s
`
`motion for judgment on the pleadings as to all claims relating to the ’231 patent based on collateral
`
`estoppel arising from final judgment of indefiniteness from the Northern District of California (see
`
`Dkt. Nos. 191, 193, 194, XR Communications, LLC v. Ruckus Wireless, 3:18-cv-01992-WHO).
`
`THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that: Final judgment is hereby entered in
`
`favor of ASUS and against Vivato on all remaining claims in this case asserted against ASUS.
`
`This final judgment is without prejudice to the Parties’ rights to appeal any past or future
`
`order or judgment in the case or this present judgment. If the final judgment of indefiniteness from
`
`the Northern District of California is vacated or reversed in part or in whole at the Federal Circuit,
`
`the Parties shall be able to renew their respective claims and/or defenses relating to the ’231 patent in
`
`this action.
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED
`
`Date: _________________, 2022
`April 15
`
`__________________________________
`Honorable David O. Carter
`1
`United States District Judge
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket