throbber
Case 2:19-cv-01444-GW-KS Document 41 Filed 07/26/19 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:731
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
`
`
`Case No. CV 19-1444-GW-KSx
`
`
`Title BlackBerry Limited v. Twitter, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`Date July 26, 2019
`
`Page 1 of 2
`
`Present: The Honorable GEORGE H. WU, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`
`
`
`
`Javier Gonzalez
`Deputy Clerk
`
`Attorneys Present for Plaintiff(s)
`
`
`
`
`
`
`None Present
`Court Reporter
`
`Attorneys Present for Defendant(s)
`
`None Present
`
`
`Proceedings: IN CHAMBERS – ORDER REGARDING HEARINGS ON PENDING
`MOTIONS
`
`None Present
`
`
`
`
`
`
`The parties have the following motions pending:
` Case No. 18-1844, Docket No. 242-2 (see also Docket No. 243): Application to File
`Documents Under Seal for Defendant Snap’s Motion for Leave to File a First
`Amended Answer and Counterclaims,1 scheduled for hearing August 15, 2019 at 8:30
`am;
` Case No. 19-1444, Docket No. 39: Defendant Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss First
`Amended Complaint, scheduled for hearing August 29, 2019 at 8:30 am by means of
`Court Order with briefing schedule entered at Docket No. 38 in that case;
` Case No. 18-1844, Docket No. 239: Defendants Facebook and Snap’s Consolidated
`Motion for Summary Judgment of Invalidity of the ’351, ’929, and ’120 Patents, set
`for hearing August 29, 2019 at 8:30 am by means of Court Order entered at Docket
`No. 231 in that case;
` Case No. 18-1844, Docket No. 244: BlackBerry’s Motion for Partial Summary
`Judgment of Infringement of the ’084 Patent, set for hearing September 5, 2019 at
`
`
`1 The only occurrence of this motion on the docket is as an attachment to an application to seal. However,
`BlackBerry has proceeded to file an opposition to the motion as if properly filed and noticed for hearing for August
`15, 2019.
`
`CV-90
`
`
`CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
`
`Initials of Deputy Clerk JG
`
`

`

`Case 2:19-cv-01444-GW-KS Document 41 Filed 07/26/19 Page 2 of 2 Page ID #:732
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
`
`
`Date July 26, 2019
`
`Page 2 of 2
`
`Case No. CV 19-1444-GW-KSx
`
`
`Title BlackBerry Limited v. Twitter, Inc.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`8:30 am;
` Case No. 18-1844, Docket No. 247: BlackBerry’s Motion for Partial Summary
`Judgment of Infringement of the ’250, ’173, and ’120 Patents, set for hearing
`September 5, 2019 at 8:30 am.
`For reasons of calendar management and judicial economy, the Court MOVES the hearing on
`each pending motion to the same date/time, September 5, 2019 at 8:30 am.
`
`The reply to the Motion for Leave to File a First Amended Complaint remains due on
`August 1, 2019. All oppositions to the summary judgment motions shall be due on August 8,
`2019 and all replies to the summary judgment motions shall be due on August 15, 2019. The
`reply to Twitter’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint also remains due on August
`15, 2019.
`
`
`CV-90
`
`
`CIVIL MINUTES—GENERAL
`
`Initials of Deputy Clerk JG
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket