`Case 2:19-cv-10227-VAP-JEM Document 49 Filed 12/03/20 Page 1 of 1 Page ID #:320
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
`
`3:59
`
`2:19-cv-10227-VAP-JEMx
`
`Date December 3, 2020
`
`Title Michelene Colette et al. v. CV Sciences, Inc.
`
`
`
`Present: The Honorable VIRGINIA A. PHILLIPS, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
`
`DAISY ROJAS
`
`Deputy Clerk
`
`Not Reported
`
`Court Reporter
`
`Attorney(s) Present for Plaintiff(s):
`
`Attorney(s) Present for Defendant(s):
`
`None Present
`
`None Present
`
`Proceedings: MINUTE ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO LIFT STAY [DKT. 48]
`(IN CHAMBERS)
`
`Before the Court is Defendant CV Sciences, Inc. (“Defendant”) and
`Plaintiffs Michelene Colette and Leticia Shaw’s (“Plaintiffs") Joint Status Report.
`(Dkt. 48). Plaintiffs request that the Court lift the stay imposed in the Court’s May
`22, 2020 Order.
`(Dkt. 46). Defendant maintains that a lift of the stay is
`premature. For the reasons set forth below, the Court declines to lift the stay.
`
`Plaintiffs claim the stay should be lifted because the FDA “has no plans to
`legalize any CBD consumer products absent a formal drug approval process...
`[and] even in the highly unlikely event the FDA does make CBD supplements and
`food with CBD legal, it is certainly not going to do so retroactively.” (Dkt. 48, at
`2). Plaintiffs’ arguments are speculative and unavailing. Plaintiffs have failed to
`provide any evidence supporting their statements about the FDA's alleged plans,
`or lack thereof, to legalize CBD- Accordingly, the case will remain STAYED until
`the FDA completes its rulemaking regarding the marketing, including labeling, of
`CBD ingestible products-
`
`IT IS SO ORDERED.
`
`Page 1 of 1
`
`CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL
`
`Initials of Deputy Clerk DR
`
`
Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.
After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.
Accept $ Charge
Still Working On It
This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.
Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.
A few More Minutes ... Still Working
It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.
Thank you for your continued patience.
This document could not be displayed.
We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.
Your account does not support viewing this document.
Set your membership
status to view this document.
With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll
get a whole lot more, including:
- Up-to-date information for this case.
- Email alerts whenever there is an update.
- Full text search for other cases.
- Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.
One Moment Please
The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.
Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.
Your document is on its way!
If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.
Sealed Document
We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.
If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.
Access Government Site
