throbber
Case 2:20-cv-04502 Document 1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 1 of 46 Page ID #:1
`
`
`
`PHILLIP A. BAKER, BAR ID #169571
`pbaker@bknlawyersc.com
`JENNIFER L. STONE, BAR ID #325493
`jstone@bknlawyers.com
`BAKER, KEENER & NAHRA, LLP
`633 West 5th Street, Suite 5500
`Los Angeles, California 90071
`Telephone: (213) 241-0900/Facsimile: (213) 241-0990
`
`MARCI LERNER MILLER, BAR ID # 162790
`marci@milleradvocacy.com
`CHRISTINA N. HOFFMAN, BAR ID #161932
`choffman@milleradvocacy.com
`MILLER ADVOCACY GROUP
`1303 Avocado Avenue, Suite 230
`Newport Beach, California 92660
`Telephone: (949) 706-9734/Facsimile: (949) 266-8069
`
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
`
`Plaintiff J.P. on behalf of her minor son
`Case No.:
`R.P., and all others similarly situated;
`
`THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR FAIR
`
`& OPEN TESTING doing business as
`
`NATIONWIDE AND
`FAIRTEST, a Massachusetts
`CALIFORNIA CLASS ACTION
`corporation; A.K., individually and on
`COMPLAINT
`behalf of all others similarly situated;
`
`R.G. on behalf of her minor son J.G., and
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`all others similarly situated; Plaintiff
`M.S. on behalf of her minor daughter
`
`Z.S., and all others similarly situated,
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`vs.
`
`EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICES
`(ETS), a New York corporation;
`THE COLLEGE ENTRANCE
`EXAMINATION BOARD, a New York
`corporation, doing business as THE
`COLLEGE BOARD; and
`DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
`
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`///
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`899-5656-0001
`
`
`
`- 1 -
`NATIONWIDE AND CALIFORNIA CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT & DEMAND JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-04502 Document 1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 2 of 46 Page ID #:2
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs, Plaintiff J.P. on behalf of her minor son R.P. and all others similarly
`situated; THE NATIONAL CENTER FOR FAIR & OPEN TESTING (“FairTest”);
`A.K., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated; R.G. on behalf of her
`minor son J.G., and all others similarly situated; Plaintiff M.S. on behalf of her minor
`daughter Z.S., and all others similarly situated (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), allege and
`plead as follows:
`
`INTRODUCTION
`1.
`Plaintiffs bring this suit against Defendants to recover the damages owed to
`them and others similarly situated and for injunctive relief as a result of the Defendants’
`failure to allow access to and failure to administer its Advanced Placement (“AP”)
`program properly and without prejudice.
`2.
`The College Board is involved at every level of the college preparation,
`testing, admissions, financial aid, and placement process. It is the leading player in the
`higher education industry responsible for the fates of millions of high school students
`every year, deciding who will be recruited, who will apply, who will be accepted, who
`will receive financial aid, and who will be able to afford college and other
`postsecondary opportunities. The Educational Testing Service (“ETS”) is responsible
`for the development, administration, and scoring of College Board’s assessments,
`including AP exams.
`3.
`AP is a program offered by the College Board that offers college-level
`courses and examinations to high school students. Colleges and universities frequently
`grant placement and course credit to students who obtain passing scores on their AP
`examinations. The length of time each student will spend in college, their curriculum,
`and how much they pay to attend college are factors heavily influenced by College
`Board and the AP opportunities available to students. The College Board claims that
`AP courses and examinations also favorably impact college admissions decisions by
`demonstrating to admissions officers that a student is prepared for college-level work.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`899-5656-0001
`
`
`
`- 2 -
`NATIONWIDE AND CALIFORNIA CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT & DEMAND JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-04502 Document 1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 3 of 46 Page ID #:3
`
`
`
`AP courses strengthens a student’s high school transcript and help students qualify for
`scholarships.
`4.
`In March of 2020, schools around the world moved to distance learning
`due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The College Board was faced with the decision of
`cancelling its popular and profitable AP program for the year, postponing the exams, or
`offering them at home to students. The College Board made the decision to offer the
`AP exams to students at home but with significant structural changes.
`5.
`The College Board was immediately made aware by numerous sources,
`including counselors, educators, advocates and families, that there were serious
`concerns that the at-home AP exams would not be fair to students who have no
`computer, access to Internet or quiet workspaces from which to work, or to under-
`resourced students in general. Even as the test began, questions remained about the
`availability and applicability of legally required accommodations for students with
`disabilities, the fair access to connectivity for all students, test security, and score
`comparability.
`6.
`Counselors, educators, advocates, and families immediately reached out to
`The College Board to make them aware of their serious concerns with the at-home AP
`format’s likely impact on students who have no computer, access to Internet or quiet
`workspaces from which to work, or on under-resourced students in general. Even as the
`test began, questions remained about the availability and applicability of legally
`required accommodations for students with disabilities, connectivity, test security, and
`score comparability.
`7.
`The College Board acknowledged that these issues existed, but it did not
`change its policies to address them. On May 14, 2020, after 3 full days of at-home AP
`exams, the College Board admitted that there was a measurable failure rate in uploading
`exams, and it attempted to change its policies going forward. The College Board’s
`President, David Coleman acknowledged in an email that, “we can't control the
`conditions in students' homes.” Technical problems with the digital versions of the AP
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`899-5656-0001
`
`
`
`- 3 -
`NATIONWIDE AND CALIFORNIA CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT & DEMAND JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-04502 Document 1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 4 of 46 Page ID #:4
`
`
`
`exams caused and continue to cause tremendous angst for high school students and their
`parents during this already stressful time.
`8.
`Before this year, high school students took their AP exams at school during
`the regular school day hours in a controlled and regulated environment where they could
`ask for assistance if necessary. The College Board acknowledged that it knew moving
`the exams home may exclude some students from testing at all, stating that, “We
`recognize that the digital divide could prevent some low-income and rural students from
`participating.” The College Board moved the AP exams to students’ homes under the
`present conditions despite this acknowledgement. In doing so, the College Board
`knowingly discriminated against under-resourced students, disabled students, and
`students in remote locations, and it failed to honor its commitments to students and their
`families.
`9.
`After one day of testing, it became clear that the College Board and ETS
`had failed to fairly, competently, or equitably administer the AP exams. The students
`who relied on AP scores for the financial benefits of college placement and credit
`experienced technical glitches, timing issues, and a heightened level of anxiety and
`distress. Reports of anywhere between 5% and 20% of examinees were unable to
`submit their responses through the at-home testing platform during the first three days
`of AP exams. One AP Coordinator reported a failure rate of 30%. Some students could
`only submit partial responses, and others could not even log on to take the exams.
`10. Despite the fact that these are challenging times for families, The College
`Board offered no acceptable remedies to students whose lack of digital access prevented
`them from fairly testing. Nor did it offer remedies to students who experienced glitches
`with the AP platform. On May 15, 2020, The Chronicle of Higher Education reported,
`“AP Tests During Covid-19: Heartbreak, Technical Glitches, and Anonymous
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`899-5656-0001
`
`
`
`- 4 -
`NATIONWIDE AND CALIFORNIA CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT & DEMAND JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-04502 Document 1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 5 of 46 Page ID #:5
`
`
`
`Intrigue.”1 On the same day, The Washington Post reported, “College Board Says New
`AP Test Online Going Well – But Students Report Big Problems.”2
`11. The College Board intends to move all of its assessments to an at-home
`format, including the SAT; however, this year’s AP exam administration makes it
`perfectly clear that until the technical issues, the digital divide and other inequities are
`adequately addressed, it cannot not do so.
`12. The challenge of the at-home AP exam format is only the final hurdle for
`many AP students, and it is also one step that many students may never even reach.
`Some AP students are fully denied access to AP exams and others must overcome
`additional hurdles to obtain access to AP exams based solely on where they are enrolled
`in school. Access is particularly challenging for students enrolled in California public
`charter schools or homeschools.
`
`THE PARTIES
`
`Plaintiffs:
`13. Plaintiff J.P. is acting on behalf of her minor son R.P. and all others
`similarly situated. R.P. is a high school student who is registered to take at-home AP
`exams. Pseudonyms have been used throughout the complaint in order to protect the
`identity of the minor Plaintiffs. Further the public has little legitimate interest in
`knowing the true identity of the Plaintiffs. The Defendants will not be prejudiced by
`allowing the Plaintiffs to proceed anonymously and in this manner until a protective
`order is in place.
`14. The National Center for Fair & Open Testing (“FairTest”) is a nationwide
`public charity that operates in California. FairTest’s mission is to advance quality
`education and equal opportunity by promoting fair, open, valid evaluations of students,
`teachers, and schools. FairTest works on behalf of examinees to end the misuses of
`
`
`1 https://www.chronicle.com/article/AP-Tests-During-Covid-19-/248792
`2 https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2020/05/15/college-board-says-new-online-ap-tests-are-going-well-students-
`report-big-problems/
`
`899-5656-0001
`
`- 5 -
`NATIONWIDE AND CALIFORNIA CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT & DEMAND JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-04502 Document 1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 6 of 46 Page ID #:6
`
`
`
`standardized tests, placing special emphasis on eliminating the racial, class, gender, and
`cultural barriers to equal opportunity. In pursuit of its mission, FairTest provides
`information and technical assistance to students and parents as well as advocacy on a
`broad range of testing concerns, including those relating to the at-home AP exams.
`15. Plaintiff A.K. is acting individually and on behalf of all others similarly
`situated. A.K. is a high school student who registered for and took AP exams.
`16. Plaintiff R.G. is acting on behalf of her minor son J.G and all others
`similarly situated. J.G. is a high school student who is registered to take at-home AP
`exams.
`17. Plaintiff M.S. is acting on behalf of her minor daughter Z.S. and all others
`similarly situated. Z.S. is a high school student who is registered to take one at-home
`AP exam.
`Defendants:
`18. Defendant EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE (“ETS”) is registered as
`a non-profit organization headquartered in Princeton, New Jersey. ETS has multiple
`offices in the State of California, including within this jurisdiction. Plaintiffs are
`informed and believe that ETS administers AP exams on behalf of Defendant College
`Board.
`19. Defendant COLLEGE ENTRANCE EXAMINATION BOARD (“The
`College Board”) is a New York corporation with its principal place of business in New
`York, New York, which does business in California. Plaintiffs are informed and believe
`that the AP program is fully owned and operated by The College Board.
`20. Defendants ETS and College Board are referred to collectively herein as
`“Defendants.”
`21. The true names and capacities of defendant DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
`whether individual, corporate, associate or otherwise, are unknown to Plaintiff, who
`therefore sues said defendants by such fictitious names and will amend to allege their
`true names and capacities when ascertained. Plaintiffs are informed and believe that
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`899-5656-0001
`
`
`
`- 6 -
`NATIONWIDE AND CALIFORNIA CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT & DEMAND JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-04502 Document 1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 7 of 46 Page ID #:7
`
`
`
`each of the DOE defendants is responsible for the acts or omissions alleged in this
`complaint, and that Plaintiffs’ injuries and damages were proximately caused by the acts
`or omissions of these unnamed defendants.
`22. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and based thereon allege, that each of
`the Defendants herein was at all relevant times the principal, agent, alter-ego, joint-
`venturer, partner, affiliate, manager, subsidiary, servant, employee and/or co-conspirator
`of each other Defendant, and in performing the acts described in this complaint, was
`acting in the scope of his, her or its authority with the consent of each other Defendant.
`Each Defendant ratified and/or authorized the wrongful acts, conduct, omissions, or
`commissions of each of the other Defendants. At all relevant times, each Defendant
`acted with full knowledge of the conduct of each of the other Defendants, with the
`intention to cooperate therewith.
`23. Plaintiffs do not know the true names and capacities, whether corporate,
`partnership, associate, individual, or otherwise of Defendant issued herein as DOES 1
`through 10, inclusive, under the provisions of Central District of California, Local Rule
`19-1. Defendant DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, are in some manner responsible for the
`acts, occurrences and transactions set forth herein, and are legally liable to Plaintiff.
`Plaintiff will seek leave to amend this Complaint to set forth the true names and
`capacities of the fictitiously named Defendants, together with appropriate charging
`allegations, when ascertained.
`24. All acts of corporate employees as alleged were authorized or ratified by an
`officer, director or managing agent of the corporate employer.
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`25. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to the
`Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d), as the proposed class contains
`more than 100 members, at least one of whom maintains citizenship in a state diverse
`from the defendant, and seeks in the aggregate more than $5,000,000, exclusive of costs
`and interest.
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`899-5656-0001
`
`
`
`- 7 -
`NATIONWIDE AND CALIFORNIA CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT & DEMAND JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-04502 Document 1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 8 of 46 Page ID #:8
`
`
`
`26. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) & (c) because a
`substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred in this
`judicial district, and because Defendants are subject to the Court’s personal jurisdiction
`in this judicial district.
`27. This Court has personal jurisdiction over the parties hereto, because the
`Defendants are corporations that do business throughout the State of California. The
`facts underlying this case arise from the State of California and from within this judicial
`district. Defendants’ conduct substantially impacts the State of California and its
`students. Plaintiffs are informed and believe that each Defendant herein has sufficient
`contacts with California so as to make proper the exercise of personal jurisdiction over
`them, and have sufficient minimum contacts so as to render the exercise of personal
`jurisdiction permissible under traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
`COMMON FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`28. The College Board claims that students who score a 3 or higher (out of 5)
`on an AP Exam typically experience greater academic success in college and are more
`likely to earn a college degree on time than non-AP students.3 As the only player in the
`education market with this level of influence over high school curriculum, college
`admissions, course placement, and financial outcomes, the College Board knows that
`access to its AP exams must be fair, reliable, and affordable.
`29. To ensure that low-income students can access AP Exams at a reduced
`cost, Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) provides funding for AP Exams and courses
`under the Title IV, Part A block grant.4 Additional funding is also available for states
`and districts to cover AP Exam fees for low-income students. In California, an
`increasing number of lower income students are enrolling in AP courses. Of the 58.7
`
`
`3 https://collegereadiness.collegeboard.org/about/benefits/connect-to-ap
`
` 4
`
` https://professionals.collegeboard.org/testing/states-local-governments/new-education-policies/essa-federal-funding-ap
`
`
`899-5656-0001
`
`
`
`- 8 -
`NATIONWIDE AND CALIFORNIA CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT & DEMAND JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-04502 Document 1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 9 of 46 Page ID #:9
`
`
`
`percent of the state's K–12 students eligible for the free or reduced-price lunch program
`in the Class of 2017, 45.5 percent took at least one AP exam.5
`30. Each year, millions of high school students take 38 different AP exams at
`the end of the school year. In 2019, 3.1 million students took a total of 4.9 million AP
`exams at school. In 2020, 3.4 million students are registered to take over 5 million AP
`exams. During the first week of testing, students took or attempted to take over 2.2
`million AP exams. The cost of an AP exam is generally between $100 and $150 per test.
`31.
`In 2018, the College Board earned over $480 million dollars from its AP
`program alone. The College Board collected its exam fees in the Fall of 2019 for the
`Spring 2020 exams.
`32. AP exams provide a means for high school students to earn college credit
`while in high school. Defendant College Board advertises that, “by taking an AP course
`and scoring successfully on the related AP Exam, [a high school student] can save on
`college expenses: most colleges and universities nationwide offer college credit,
`advanced placement, or both, for qualifying AP Exam scores... These credits can allow
`students to save college tuition, study abroad, or secure a second major.” College Board
`further advertises that, “[e]arning a qualifying score on the AP Exam can help you
`advance and avoid required introductory courses – so you can move directly into upper-
`level classes and focus on the work that interests you most.”
`33. The AP program is the only widely available high program allowing
`students to earn college credits. Defendant College Board organizes and administers the
`AP tests. The AP program is the only means for high school students to test for college
`credit in dozens of subject matters. In order to obtain college credits, students are
`required to pass the AP test, as scored and reported by Defendants.
`34. Passing scores (a 3, 4, or 5) on the AP exams can save students and their
`parents thousands of dollars in college tuition and costs. A successful student who takes
`
`
`5 https://www.cde.ca.gov/nr/ne/yr18/yr18rel16.asp
`
`899-5656-0001
`
`
`
`- 9 -
`NATIONWIDE AND CALIFORNIA CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT & DEMAND JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-04502 Document 1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 10 of 46 Page ID #:10
`
`
`
`multiple AP exams can potentially finish college a year or more earlier than students
`who did not earn AP credit during high school. Some students understandably wanted
`an option to take their AP exams for college credit when COVID-19 forced their
`schools to convert to distance learning and they could no longer test at school.
`35. However, the format of the at-home AP exams is different from the format
`students are accustomed to and different from the practice AP exams they have taken.
`The 2020 home-based AP exams are digitally-based instead of on paper as they have
`always been in the past. The new exams are scheduled to last only 45 minutes (actually
`40 minutes with the required 5 minutes to begin uploading answers before the test ends)
`instead of 3 hours, and all tests in the same subject are given at exactly the same time.
`This means that some students in one part of the world could be taking an exam in the
`middle of the night, while others are taking it in the middle of the day. Students in
`Hawaii begin their first exams each day at 6 a.m., while students in New York begin the
`same exams at noon. The 2020 exams include material covered until the time of the
`COVID-19 breakout instead of the entire course curriculum. Most importantly, the
`exams are taken at home, where the testing environment can be unpredictable and
`distracting.
`36. Some of the issues with the at-home format should have been anticipated.
`As soon as the College Board announced its plans to administer at-home exams,
`educators, students, parents, and AP coordinators voiced their concerns over equity and
`access issues. They also expressed concerns about timing and technical problems with
`the new format as well as score validity.
`37. The College Board announced prior to the administration of the at-home
`exams that certain disability accommodations that were previously provided would be
`modified, eliminated, or were deemed “unnecessary” due to the new format.
`38. Dozens of educators and counselors wrote an “Open Letter” to the College
`Board on April 22, 2020 outlining why the exams would not be fair to students who
`have no computer, access to Internet or quiet work spaces from which to work, or to
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`899-5656-0001
`
`
`
`- 10 -
`NATIONWIDE AND CALIFORNIA CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT & DEMAND JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-04502 Document 1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 11 of 46 Page ID #:11
`
`
`
`students with disabilities who would not have their approved accommodations.6 Plaintiff
`FairTest announced that its concerns about the 2020 AP exams included computer
`equipment and technology, connectivity, the availability of legally required
`accommodations, security, and score comparability.
`39. The College Board did not address these issues or change its policies prior
`to the administration of the at-home AP exams. In fact, on May 14, 2020, after 3 full
`days of AP exam administration, College Board’s President David Coleman
`acknowledged in an email that, “we can't control the conditions in students' homes.” He
`added, “Students may face technology or internet issues, need to tend to unexpected
`family obligations, or face other disruptions that will impact their testing experience.
`Like the virus itself, these disruptions will disproportionately impact low-income and
`underrepresented students.” Instead of changing the testing format to address the
`disparities among student testing environments, however, Mr. Coleman recommended
`that students explain their disadvantages to college admissions officers. In an admission
`that the tests are not valid for all students, Coleman said, “We're working to ensure that
`students who take the exam in challenging situations can share context with admissions
`officers about their exam experience.”
`40. The first week of the 2020 AP exams revealed the deep digital divide
`among AP test-takers, and it became clear how the revised exam format
`disproportionately impacted certain groups of students, including those who are under-
`resourced, who lack access to technology or quiet workspaces, students with disabilities,
`and students testing in non-ideal time zones. A number of students suffered from
`technical glitches, timing issues, issues with their computer software, disability
`accommodation issues, and widespread panic due to the inability to reach anyone at the
`College Board for assistance.
`
`
`6 https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2020/04/22/an-open-letter-college-board-about-online-at-home-ap-tests/
`
`899-5656-0001
`
`- 11 -
`NATIONWIDE AND CALIFORNIA CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT & DEMAND JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-04502 Document 1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 12 of 46 Page ID #:12
`
`
`
`41. After the first week of testing, The College Board reported a failure rate of
`only 1%, but AP coordinators and students told a different story. Schools estimated that
`anywhere between 5-20% of their AP test-takers were unable to submit their exam
`responses through College Board’s testing platform during the first week. Other
`students could not finish their exams or log into the platform at all despite practicing
`beforehand.
`42. One AP Calculus teacher reported that 3 out of her 13 students, or 23% of
`her students, faced technical obstacles submitting their work during the AP Calculus AB
`examination. This Santa Barbara-area teacher reported that one of her students received
`an upload error message after the testing time had expired. A second student had issues
`with her devices, even though she had practiced logging on and taking mock exams with
`her teacher. A third student in the class reported that her screen froze, then went blank,
`and then logged the student out upon trying to submit her answers. This student was
`never able to get back into the exam to upload her submissions.
`43. Another AP Coordinator reported that, “This whole thing was a mess. It
`was unprofessional and added more stress to the students, teachers, families, and
`coordinators.” Another AP coordinator reported a 10% failure rate on the AP Calculus
`exam. These reports from the ground to do not square up with the College Board’s
`statement that “the vast majority” of the 2.2 million students who tested last week
`successfully completed those exams, or its written statement that less than 1% technical
`of test takers encountered technical difficulties.
`44. Students who experienced issues with the College Board’s platform
`emailed their time-stamped work to the College Board, but it was not accepted. They
`were told that their only remedy was to retake the exam over the summer, if they
`qualified for a retake exam. Students’ anxiety continued to grow as the week progressed
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`899-5656-0001
`
`
`
`- 12 -
`NATIONWIDE AND CALIFORNIA CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT & DEMAND JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-04502 Document 1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 13 of 46 Page ID #:13
`
`
`
`due to legitimate fears that they would complete their work but not be unable to submit
`it and would then have no remedy.7
`45. Students have not been able to confirm access to the retake exams despite
`technical failures. Students have also reported that they have two AP exams scheduled
`for the same retake day and that they were told by The College Board that they would
`have to choose only one exam to take.
`46. FairTest received an influx of reports about at-home AP exam failures and
`the lack of remedies. One parent reported, “We also had technical issues trying to sign
`up for a make-up exam. I spent over an hour on phone with CB. They refused to allow
`me to speak to supervisor and offered no reassurance that the problem would be fixed
`by a makeup.”
`47. One student reported that, “Due to a technical malfunction on the College
`Board's website during the APUSH exam (AP U.S. History), I was unable to submit by
`work. My dad has been critically ill and hospitalized for the past few weeks and despite
`this challenge, I persisted in preparing for my AP exams because I wanted to achieve
`my goals of earning college credits. Now, due to a technical issue on the College
`Board's website, I am going to have to continue working during this incredibly stressful
`time in my life to prepare to re-take the exam in June.”
`48. One parent said, “My son has time stamped images of his Physics AP
`answers. Why can’t college board find a way to accept those? We worry there is no
`make up for the make-up test. What happens if this glitch happens on the make up?”
`Another parent reported, “We also had technical issues trying to sign up for make-up
`exam. I spent over an hour on phone with CB. They refused to allow me to speak to
`supervisor and offered no reassurance that problem would be fixed by makeup.”
`
`
`7 https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2020/05/15/college-board-says-new-online-ap-tests-are-going-well-students-
`report-big-problems/
`https://www.insidehighered.com/admissions/article/2020/05/18/students-complain-they-cannot-submit-ap-tests
`
`899-5656-0001
`
`- 13 -
`NATIONWIDE AND CALIFORNIA CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT & DEMAND JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-04502 Document 1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 14 of 46 Page ID #:14
`
`
`
`49. One student described the experience of carefully preparing for the exam
`but still being unable to submit his responses. “I took all precautions once I heard from
`some students that there were submission errors. I updated my computer, used chrome
`because it was recommended by the college board, sent my brother to my dad’s house
`so I wasn’t distracted during my test, and made my family get off the wifi so I could
`have the maximum potential my wifi could give me. . . Then, when I took Physics 1, my
`first answer submitted with no problem, but my second question wouldn’t submit.”
`50.
`In response to the complaints, the College Board officials initially claimed
`that their systems did not malfunction, but the problems were instead caused by
`students. Students were instructed to update their browsers, disable plug-ins, and make
`sure their devices were properly set up.
`51. Ultimately, in response to what some called a “tsunami” of complaints, the
`College Board made some adjustments to its policies, announcing on May 17, 2020 that
`it would provide a backup email submission option of browser-based exams for students
`testing between May 18 and May 22, 2020. Nonetheless, if the student is unable to
`upload responses through the exam platform or successfully transmit by email at the
`time of the exam, as in the case of a home connectivity problem, the student would still
`have to request a makeup exam. In addition, the College Board will not accept email
`transmissions from students who already tested between May 11 and May 15, 2020.
`52. Students taking exams between May 18 and May 22, 2020 have an added
`safeguard, providing a slightly more desirable and less stressful testing environment for
`these test-takers. Students who experienced technical failures during the first week have
`still not received any confirmation that they will be eligible to take a makeup exam or
`that they will receive the added safeguard of email submission, even for their retakes.
`53. An online petition is circulating, called “Let Students Submit AP Work,”
`which requests remedies for the students who tested between May 11 and May 15, 2020
`and could not submit their work.8 The Petition states that, “We, along with all our
`
`8 https://www.change.org/p/college-board-let-students-re-submit-ap-work?signed=true
`899-5656-0001
`- 14 -
`NATIONWIDE AND CALIFORNIA CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT & DEMAND JURY TRIAL
`
`
`
`
`
`1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
`
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-04502 Document 1 Filed 05/19/20 Page 15 of 46 Page ID #:15
`
`
`
`sisters and brothers in humanity, have already been having a hard time because of
`COVID and we were already tired and stressed out and a lot of us have been struggling
`with sadness and mental health issues. This will make all of that worse. Fortunately,

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket