throbber

`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`Laurence M. Rosen, Esq. (SBN 219683)
`THE ROSEN LAW FIRM, P.A.
`355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2450
`Los Angeles, CA 90071
`Telephone: (213) 785-2610
`Facsimile: (213) 226-4684
`Email: lrosen@rosenlegal.com
`
`
`Counsel for Plaintiff
`
`
`
`
`IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Case No.:
`
`
`
`
`DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
`
`JESUS MENDOZA, derivatively on
`behalf of HF FOODS GROUP INC.,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`v.
`
`
`
`ZHOU MIN NI, XIAO MOU ZHANG,
`CAIXUAN XU, JIAN MING NI,
`ZHEHUI NI, HONG WANG, CHAN
`SIN WONG, and REN HUA ZHENG,
`
`
`
`
`
`
`HF FOODS GROUP INC.,
`
`
`
`Defendants,
`
`and
`
`Nominal Defendant.
`
`
`
`
`VERIFIED SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`INTRODUCTION
`
`Plaintiff Jesus Mendoza (“Plaintiff”), by Plaintiff’s undersigned attorneys,
`
`derivatively and on behalf of Nominal Defendant HF Foods Group Inc. (“HF Foods” or
`
`the “Company”), files this Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint against Individual
`
`Defendants Zhou Min Ni, Xiao Mou Zhang, Caixuan Xu, Jian Ming Ni, Zhehui Ni, Hong
`
`Wang, Chan Sin Wong, and Ren Hua Zheng (collectively, the “Individual Defendants,”
`
`and together with HF Foods, the “Defendants”) for breaches of their fiduciary duties as
`
`controlling shareholder, directors and/or officers of HF Foods, unjust enrichment, abuse
`
`of control, gross mismanagement, waste of corporate assets and violations of Sections
`
`14(a), 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). As
`
`for Plaintiff’s complaint against the Individual Defendants, Plaintiff alleges the following
`
`based upon personal knowledge as to Plaintiff and Plaintiff’s own acts, and information
`
`and belief as to all other matters, based upon, inter alia, the investigation conducted by
`
`and through Plaintiff’s attorneys, which included, among other things, a review of the
`
`Defendants’ public documents and announcements made by Defendants, United States
`
`Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filings, wire and press releases published
`
`by and regarding HF Foods, legal filings, news reports, securities analysts’ reports and
`
`advisories about the Company, and information readily obtainable on the Internet.
`
`Plaintiff believes that substantial evidentiary support will exist for the allegations set
`
`forth herein after a reasonable opportunity for discovery.
`
`NATURE OF THE ACTION
`
`1.
`
`This is a shareholder derivative action that seeks to remedy wrongdoing
`
`committed by HF Foods’ directors, officers, and controlling shareholder from August 23,
`
`2018 through the present (the “Relevant Period”).
`
`2.
`
`HF Foods, formerly known as Atlantic Acquisition Corp. (“Atlantic”),
`
`through its subsidiaries, is a leading food service distributor to Asian restaurants,
`1
`Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint
`
`
`
`
`
`
`

`

`particularly Chinese restaurants, and other food service customers across the United
`
`States. The Company boasts 14 distribution centers, a fleet of over 340 refrigerated
`
`vehicles, and over 10,000 Asian restaurant customers in 21 states.
`
`3.
`
`In March 2018, Atlantic entered into a merger agreement with a privately
`
`held North Carolina corporation, “HF Group Holding Corporation” (“HF Group”).
`
`Pursuant to the agreement, HF Group merged with a subsidiary formed by Atlantic and
`
`became the surviving entity and wholly owned subsidiary of Atlantic.
`
`4.
`
`In November 2019, HF Foods completed another business combination, this
`
`time, with another leading Asian restaurant distributor and wholesale supplier, B&R
`
`Global Holdings Inc. (“B&R Global”) based in California, for approximately 30.7 million
`
`shares of HF Foods common stock.
`
`5.
`
`HF Foods conducts a significant amount of business with related parties
`
`through regular sales and purchases made during the normal course of business.
`
`6.
`
`Throughout the Relevant Period, the Individual Defendants caused the
`
`Company to consistently make statements in the Company’s SEC filings and press
`
`releases that misrepresented the Company’s business operations, prospects, and
`
`compliance, particularly with respect to the related party transactions HF Foods was
`
`engaged in. While the Company’s SEC filings purported to accurately disclose, among
`
`other things, all related party transactions, the Company was actually engaging in
`
`numerous undisclosed related party activity, in addition to dubious disclosed activities,
`
`that enabled insiders to unjustly enrich themselves to the detriment of the Company and
`
`its shareholders.
`
`7.
`
`The truth was revealed to the public on March 23, 2020, when Hidenburg
`
`Research published a report disclosing (i) alarming similarities between HF Foods and
`
`two prior mergers orchestrated by Atlantic that ended in poor states; (ii) undisclosed links
`
`between B&R Global and the Company, suggesting that the massive merger between the
`
`companies was actually an undisclosed related party transaction, rather than one at
`
` 2
`
`
`Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`“arm’s-length”; (iii) numerous red flags with HF Foods’ related parties and purported use
`
`of shareholder cash, including the inexplicable purchase of exotic supercars for
`
`businesses affiliated with HF Foods; (iv) concerning issues with HF Foods’ auditor; and
`
`(v) allegations of foul play with the amount of HF Foods’ free floating shares for the
`
`FTSE/Russell indices (the “Hidenburg Report”).
`
`8.
`
`On this news, the price of the Company’s stock dropped from $12.32 per
`
`share at the close of the previous trading day on March 20, 2020, to $9.80 at the close of
`
`trading on March 23, 2020, a drop of over 20%.
`
`9.
`
`During the Relevant Period, the Individual Defendants breached their
`
`fiduciary duties by engaging in and or causing the Company to engage in numerous
`
`related party transactions (both disclosed and undisclosed) that resulted in the concealed
`
`enrichment of Company insiders and affiliates, including: (1) loaning or otherwise
`
`utilizing Company money for improper purchases and advances to the Chief Executive
`
`Officer’s (“CEO”) son’s purported businesses and another Company subsidiary,
`
`including to purchase a fleet of exotic luxury supercars, such as Ferraris and others with
`
`vanity plates; (2) using HF Foods to shuffle cash through disclosed sales and purchases to
`
`dubious affiliates of the Company’s CEO and other insiders; and (3) allowing related
`
`parties to effectively “loot” the Company with wholesale purchases, causing a collapse in
`
`the Company’s wholesale margins (collectively, the “Related Party Misconduct”).
`
`10.
`
`In further breach of their fiduciary duties during the Relevant Period, the
`
`Individual Defendants personally made and/or caused the Company to make to the
`
`investing public a series of materially false and misleading statements about HF Foods’
`
`business, operations, and compliance. Specifically, the Individual Defendants willfully or
`
`recklessly made and/or caused the Company to make false and misleading statements to
`
`the investing public that failed to disclose, inter alia, that: (1) HF Foods engaged in the
`
`Related Party Misconduct; and (2) the Company was “gaming” FTSE/Russell indices by
`
` 3
`
`
`Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`concealing the actual number of free floating shares. As a result of the foregoing, HF
`
`Foods’ public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
`
`11. The Individual Defendants also breached their fiduciary duties by failing to
`
`correct and/or causing the Company to fail to correct these false and misleading
`
`statements and omissions of material fact to the investing public.
`
`12. Additionally, in breach of their fiduciary duties, the Individual Defendants
`
`caused the Company to continuously fail to maintain adequate internal controls
`
`throughout the duration of the Relevant Period, including by utilizing an independent
`
`auditor with questionable standing.
`
`13. Furthermore, the Individual Defendants breached their fiduciary duties by
`
`causing the Company to repurchase its own stock at prices that were artificially inflated
`
`due to the foregoing misrepresentations, while at least one of the Individual Defendants
`
`breached their fiduciary duties by engaging in improper insider sales, obtaining proceeds
`
`of over $67,894.
`
`14. According to the Company’s quarterly report filed with the SEC on a Form
`
`10-Q on November 14, 2019, approximately 905,115 shares of the Company’s stock
`
`were repurchased at inflated prices between September 1, 2019 and September 30, 2019
`
`for approximately $12,038,029, the aggregate balance of principal and accrued interest on
`
`four unsecured loans. As the Company’s stock was actually only worth $9.80 per share,
`
`the price at which it was trading on March 23, 2020, the Company overpaid
`
`approximately $3.16 million in total.
`
`15.
`
`Foods, its Co-CEOs, its Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), and its former CFO to being
`
`In light of the Individual Defendants’ misconduct, which has subjected HF
`
`named as defendants in two federal securities fraud class action lawsuits pending in the
`
`United States District Court for the Central District of California (the “Securities Class
`
`Actions”), the need to undertake internal investigations, the need to implement adequate
`
`internal controls over its financial reporting, the losses from the waste of corporate assets,
`
` 4
`
`
`Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`the losses due to the unjust enrichment of the Individual Defendants who were
`
`improperly over-compensated by the Company and/or who benefitted from the
`
`wrongdoing alleged herein, the Company will have to expend many millions of dollars.
`
`16.
`
`In light of the breaches of fiduciary duty engaged in by the Individual
`
`Defendants, most of whom are the Company’s current directors, their collective
`
`engagement in fraud, the substantial likelihood of the directors’ liability in this derivative
`
`action and the Co-CEOs’ liability in the Securities Class Actions, their being beholden to
`
`each other, their longstanding business and personal relationships with each other, and
`
`their not being disinterested and/or independent directors, a majority of HF Foods’ Board
`
`of Directors (the “Board”) cannot consider a demand to commence litigation against
`
`themselves on behalf of the Company with the requisite level of disinterestedness and
`
`independence.
`
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`
`17. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331
`
`because Plaintiff’s claims raise a federal question under Section 14(a) of the Exchange
`
`Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78n, Rule 14a-9 of the Exchange Act, 17 C.F.R. § 240.14a-9, Sections
`
`10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 78j, 78t), and SEC Rule 10b-5 (17
`
`C.F.R. § 240.10b-5) promulgated thereunder.
`
`18. Plaintiff’s claims also raise a federal question pertaining to the claims made
`
`in the Securities Class Action based on violations of the Exchange Act.
`
`19. This Court has supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s state law claims
`
`pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(a).
`
`20. This derivative action is not a collusive action to confer jurisdiction on a
`
`court of the United States that it would not otherwise have.
`
`21. The Court has personal jurisdiction over each of the Defendants because
`
`each Defendant is either a corporation incorporated in this District, or he or she is an
`
` 5
`
`
`Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`individual who has minimum contacts with this District to justify the exercise of
`
`jurisdiction over them.
`
`22. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391 and 1401
`
`because a substantial portion of the transactions and wrongs complained of herein
`
`occurred in this District, and the Defendants have received substantial compensation in
`
`this District by engaging in numerous activities that had an effect in this District.
`
`23. Venue is proper in this District because HF Foods and the Individual
`
`Defendants have conducted business in this District, and Defendants’ actions have had an
`
`effect in this District.
`
`Plaintiff
`
`PARTIES
`
`24. Plaintiff is a current shareholder of HF Foods common stock. Plaintiff has
`
`continuously held HF Foods common stock at all relevant times.
`
`Nominal Defendant HF Foods
`
`25. HF Foods is a Delaware corporation with its principal executive offices
`
`located at 19319 Arenth Avenue, City of Industry, California 91748, as of May 4, 2020.
`
`Prior to May 4, 2020, the Company’s principal executive offices were located at 6001 W.
`
`Market Street, Greensboro, North Carolina 27409. HF Foods’ shares trade on the Nasdaq
`
`Global Select Market (“NASDAQ”) under the ticker symbol “HFFG.”
`
`Defendant Min Ni
`
`26. Defendant Zhou Min Ni (“Min Ni”) is the co-founder of HF Group, and has
`
`served as the Company’s Chairman since 2018, and as the Company’s Co-CEO since
`
`November 2019. Previously, Min Ni served as the Company’s sole CEO from August
`
`2018 until November 2019, and as HF Group’s CEO and Chairman since its founding in
`
`1997. According to the Company’s Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on April 29, 2020
`
`(the “2020 Proxy Statement”), as of April 20, 2020, Defendant Min Ni beneficially
`
`owned 13,772,713 shares of the Company’s common stock, which represented 26.4% of
`
` 6
`
`
`Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock on that date. Given that the price per
`
`share of the Company’s common stock at the close of trading on April 20, 2020 was
`
`$6.31, Defendant Min Ni owned approximately $86.9 million worth of HF Foods stock.
`
`27. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, Defendant Min Ni purportedly
`
`received $400,000 in compensation from the Company.
`
`28. The Company’s 2020 Proxy Statement stated the following about Defendant
`
`Min Ni:
`
`Zhou Min Ni, together with his wife, Chan Sin Wong, founded HF Group.
`Mr. Ni has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of HF Group for
`over 20 years since he founded the business in 1997. From 1997 to the
`present, Mr. Ni has been responsible for the supervision of the Company’s
`strategy development, financing, acquisition, business expansion, inventory
`procurement and vendor management. Under his leadership, the Company
`developed into a well-recognized foodservice distributor operating three
`distribution centers serving over 3,200 Chinese/Asian restaurants in ten
`states in Southeastern America. We believe Mr. Zhou Min Ni’s qualification
`to sit on our board of directors includes his extensive knowledge of the
`Company and the foodservice distribution industry serving Chinese/Asian
`restaurants, his 20 years of management and leadership experience in the
`Company, and his connections in Chinese/Asian American business society.
`
`
`
`Defendant Zhang
`
`29. Defendant Xiao Mou (aka Peter) Zhang (“Zhang”) has served as HF Foods’
`
`Co-CEO and as a Company director since November 2019. He also served as the
`
`Company’s CFO from November 2019 until he resigned from that position on May 1,
`
`2020. Previously, he served as Chairman of the Board of B&R Global, which he founded
`
`in 2014. According to the 2020 Proxy Statement, as of April 20, 2020, Defendant Zhang
`
`beneficially owned 3,089,354 shares of the Company’s common stock, which represented
`
`5.9% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock on that date. Given that the
`
`price per share of the Company’s common stock at the close of trading on April 20, 2020
`
` 7
`
`
`Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`was $6.31, Defendant Zhang owned approximately $19.4 million worth of HF Foods
`
`stock.
`
`30. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, Defendant Zhang received
`
`$93,494 in compensation from the Company. This included $85,000 in salary, and $8,494
`
`in other compensation related to the personal use of an automobile provided by the
`
`Company.
`
`31. The Company’s 2020 Proxy Statement stated the following about Defendant
`
`Zhang:
`
`Xiao Mou Zhang (aka Peter Zhang), has served as Co- Chief Executive
`Officer and Chief Financial Officer and a director since November 4, 2019.
`He served as Chairman of the Board, and as a Director of B&R Global from
`2014 when he founded B&R Global with his partners, who are all originally
`from China. Mr. Zhang has over 20 years of experience in the food
`distribution
`industry with extensive experience
`in sales, marketing,
`financing, acquisitions, inventory, logistics and distribution. Under Mr.
`Zhang’s leadership, B&R Global has established a large supplier network
`and maintains long-term relationships with many major suppliers stemming
`from business relationships that have been built up over the years. A large
`purchase volume and a centralized procurement process has also allowed
`B&R Global favorable negotiating power with vendors that source high
`quality products at lower prices than many competitors. By also establishing
`a call center in China, B&R Global has been able to grow its customer base
`and, at the same time, keep its operating costs low. We believe Mr. Zhang’s
`qualification to sit on our board of directors includes his extensive
`knowledge of
`the
`food distribution
`industry, particularly serving
`Chinese/Asian restaurants, and his 20 years of management and leadership
`experience at B&R Global.
`
`Defendant Xu
`
`
`32. Defendant Caixuan Xu (“Xu”) has served as the Company’s Vice President,
`
`Chief Accounting and Financial Reporting Officer since February 2019. She also served
`
`as the Company’s CFO from April 2019 to November 2019.
`
` 8
`
`
`Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`33. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, Defendant Xu received
`
`$229,167 in compensation from the Company. This included $201,667 in salary, and
`
`$27,500 in bonus.
`
`34. The Company’s 2020 Proxy Statement stated the following about Defendant
`
`
`Xu:
`
`Caixuan Xu has served as the Vice President, Chief Internal Control and
`Financial Planning Officer since November 4, 2019 and served as the Chief
`Financial Officer of HF Group from April 1, 2019 to November 4, 2019. Ms.
`Xu was hired by HF Foods on February 1, 2019. Ms. Xu has nearly 20 years
`of accounting and financial management experience. Prior to joining the
`Company, Ms. Xu served as the Vice President of Finance of Ninestar
`(Lexmark) since June 2018. Ms. Xu served as the Finance Director (Greater
`China CFO) for Red Hat from June 2017 until June 2018, and as the Chief
`Financial Officer of Shouqi Car Rental in Beijing, China from December
`2016 through June 2017. Prior to that, she spent five years in finance
`positions with Lenovo in Morrisville, NC and Beijing, China, most recently
`as Senior Finance Manager and Controller. Before joining Lenovo, Ms. Xu
`held finance and auditor positions with Credit Suisse and PwC in Durham
`and Raleigh, NC, which followed her earlier career in public accounting
`firms (PwC and Tin Wha CPAs) in Beijing, China. Ms. Xu earned a BS in
`Accounting from The Central University of Finance and Economics in
`Beijing, China, and a Master’s Degree in Business Administration from the
`Freeman School of Business in New Orleans, LA. She is a CPA, certified in
`both North Carolina and Beijing, China (inactive), and has passed all three
`levels of the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) exams.
`
`
`
`Defendant Jonathan Ni
`
`35. Defendant Jian Ming Ni (“Jonathan Ni”) served as the Company’s CFO
`
`from August 2018 until his resignation in April 2019. Previously, he served as HF
`
`Group’s CFO from 2008. According to the 2020 Proxy Statement, as of April 20, 2020,
`
`Defendant Jonathan Ni held voting and dispositive power over the shares owned by
`
`Irrevocable Trust for Raymond Ni, the CEO’s son, which beneficially owned 5,591,553
`
`shares of the Company’s common stock. This represented 10.7% of the Company’s
`
`outstanding shares of common stock on that date. Given that the price per share of the
`
` 9
`
`
`Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Company’s common stock at the close of trading on April 20, 2020 was $6.31, Defendant
`
`Jonathan Ni owned approximately $35.2 million worth of HF Foods stock.
`
`Defendant Ni
`
`36. Defendant Zhehui Ni (“Ni”) has served as a Company director since August
`
`2018, and also serves as a member of the Audit Committee and the Compensation
`
`Committee.
`
`37. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, Defendant Ni received
`
`$20,000 in compensation from the Company.
`
`38. The Company’s 2020 Proxy Statement stated the following about Defendant
`
`Ni:
`
`Zhehui Ni has served as a director of HF Group since August 2018. Ms. Ni
`has served as vice president of Shanghai Electric Investment Company since
`2014, charged with strategic and financial investment. She worked as an
`associate at Haixiahuifu Investment Company from 2011 to 2013 and
`worked as a senior consultant in Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Shanghai Office
`from 2007 to 2011. Ms. Ni is experienced in equity investment, corporate
`finance and investment-related tax structuring. Ms. Ni received a master’s
`degree and bachelor’s degree in international economical law from Shanghai
`Jiaotong University. She is a certified public accountant and certified tax
`accountant, and passed the bar exam in the People’s Republic of China. We
`believe Ms. Ni’s qualification to sit on our board of directors includes her
`knowledge in accounting, financial reporting, equity investment, corporate
`finance, and investment-related tax structuring.
`
`Defendant Wang
`
`39. Defendant Hong Wang (“Wang”) has served as a Company director since
`
`December 2019, and also serves as a member of the Audit Committee and the
`
`Compensation Committee. Previously, Defendant Wang served as a Company director
`
`from August 2018 until November 2019.
`
`40. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, Defendant Wang received
`
`$20,000 in compensation from the Company.
`
`
`10
`Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`41. The Company’s 2020 Proxy Statement stated the following about Defendant
`
`Wang:
`
`Hong Wang has served as a director of HF Group since December 2019.
`Mr. Wang was previously a member of the Board of Directors of the
`
`Company from August 22, 2018, through November 1, 2019. Dr. Wang has
`served as a Professor of Management Information Systems at North Carolina
`A&T State University since 2005 and a Visiting Professor at Yunnan
`University of Finance and Economics in China since June, 2012, Dalian
`Maritime University in China since June 2012, and Henan Polytechnic
`University in China since June 2015. Dr. Wang has over 30 years of
`university teaching experience and has taught Management Sciences,
`Operations Research, Optimization, Business Environment, Management
`Concepts, Strategic Management, Engineering Economy, in addition to
`various Information Systems courses at both graduate and undergraduate
`levels. Dr. Wang is active in professional and community services. He has
`served in multiple cities in the US for several terms as president of local
`Chinese Associations, on various boards, as a principal of Chinese schools,
`as session chair of academic conferences, and as a journal referee. He also
`helped several Chinese universities to establish international programs in
`collaboration with US universities. Dr. Wang received his Ph.D. in
`Management Information Systems/Decision Sciences from Ohio State
`University. We believe Dr. Wang’s qualifications to sit on our board of
`directors include his knowledge of management, operations, optimization,
`business environment, and economic engineering, and his prior effective
`service as a member of our board.
`
`Defendant Wong
`
`42. Defendant Chan Sin Wong (“Wong”) is the wife of Defendant Min Ni and
`
`co-founder of HF Group. She served as the Company’s Chief Operating Officer,
`
`
`President, and as a Company director from August 2018 until November 2019.
`
`43. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, Defendant Wong received
`
`$400,000 in compensation from the Company.
`
`44. The Company’s Schedule 14A filed with the SEC on April 30, 2019 (the
`
`“2019 Proxy Statement”) stated the following about Defendant Wong:
`
`
`11
`Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint
`
`
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`Chan Sin Wong, 53, the wife of Zhou Min Ni, co-founded the Company in
`1997. She has served as Director and President of the Company for over 20
`years since she co-founded HF Group in 1997. From 1997 to the present,
`Ms. Wong has been responsible for the operation and supervision of the
`Company,
`including sales,
`inventory,
`logistics distribution, human
`resources, regulations and legal compliance. She also led the development of
`
`the Company’s logistics and distribution network. We believe Ms. Wong’s
`qualification to sit on our board of directors includes her knowledge of the
`Company, her extensive expertise in Company operations, and established
`relationships with service providers.
`
`Defendant Zheng
`
`45. Defendant Ren Hua Zheng (“Zheng”) served as a Company director from
`
`June 2017, prior to the merger with Atlantic, until he resigned in December 2019.
`
`Defendant Zheng served as a member of the Audit Committee and the Compensation
`
`Committee during the Relevant Period.
`
`46. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, Defendant Zheng received
`
`$20,000 in compensation from the Company.
`
`47. During the period of time when the Company materially misstated
`
`information to the investing public to keep the stock price inflated, and before the scheme
`
`was exposed, Defendant Zheng made the following sales of Company stock, and made no
`
`purchases of Company stock:
`
`Date
`9/6/2019
`9/9/2019
`9/10/2019
`9/11/2019
`
`Shares
`208
`500
`1,000
`2,000
`
`Cost
`$19.13
`$18.61
`$18.35
`$18.13
`
`Proceeds
`$3,979
`$9,305
`$18,350
`$36,260
`
`
`
`Thus, in total, before the fraud was exposed, he sold 3,708 Company shares on inside
`
`information, for which he received approximately $67,894. His insider sales made with
`
`knowledge of material non-public information before the material misstatements and
`
`omissions were exposed demonstrate his motive in facilitating and participating in the
`
`scheme.
`
`
`
`
`12
`Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`48. The Company’s 2019 Proxy Statement stated the following about Defendant
`
`Zheng:
`
`Ren Hua Zheng, 48, has served as a director since June 2017. Mr. Zheng
`founded Hope Kitchen Cabinets and Stone Supply LLC, a cabinet decoration
`
`company in the United States, and has served as its Manager since January
`2006. Mr. Zheng has served as Property Manager of H&C Brother LLC,
`Orland Property LLC, B&J Investment LLC, and 5904 5th Ave LLC since
`January 1999. We believe Mr. Zheng’s qualification to sit on our board of
`directors includes his business experience in the areas of strategy
`implementation, sales and marketing, staff training, cost analysis, and
`financial budget supervision in enterprise operation.
`
`FIDUCIARY DUTIES OF THE INDIVIDUAL DEFENDANTS
`
`49. By reason of their positions as controlling shareholder, officers, directors,
`
`and/or fiduciaries of HF Foods and because of their ability to control the business and
`
`corporate affairs of HF Foods, the Individual Defendants owed HF Foods and its
`
`shareholders fiduciary obligations of trust, loyalty, good faith, and due care, and were and
`
`are required to use their utmost ability to control and manage HF Foods in a fair, just,
`
`honest, and equitable manner. The Individual Defendants were and are required to act in
`
`furtherance of the best interests of HF Foods and its shareholders so as to benefit all
`
`shareholders equally.
`
`50. Each controlling shareholder, director and officer of the Company owes to
`
`HF Foods and its shareholders the fiduciary duty to exercise good faith and diligence in
`
`the administration of the Company and in the use and preservation of its property and
`
`assets and the highest obligations of fair dealing.
`
`
`51. The Individual Defendants, because of their positions of control and
`
`authority as controlling shareholder, directors and/or officers of HF Foods, were able to
`
`and did, directly and/or indirectly, exercise control over the wrongful acts complained of
`
`herein.
`
`
`
`
`13
`Verified Shareholder Derivative Complaint
`
`

`

`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`52. To discharge their duties, the controlling shareholder, officers and directors
`
`of HF Foods were required to exercise reasonable and prudent supervision over the
`
`management, policies, controls, and operations of the Company.
`
`53. Each Individual Defendant, by virtue of his or her position as a controlling
`
`shareholder, director and/or officer, owed to the Company and to its shareholders the
`
`highest fiduciary duties of loyalty, good faith, and the exercise of due care and diligence
`
`in the management and administration of the affairs of the Company, as well as in the use
`
`and preservation of its property and assets. The conduct of the Individual Defendants
`
`complained of herein involves a knowing and culpable violation of their obligations as
`
`directors and officers of HF Foods, the absence of good faith on their part, or a reckless
`
`disregard for their duties to the Company and its shareholders that the Individual
`
`Defendants were aware or should have been aware posed a risk of serious injury to the
`
`Compan

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket