throbber
Case 2:20-cv-07672 Document 1 Filed 08/24/20 Page 1 of 39 Page ID #:1
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Beth S. Brinkmann (SBN 129937)**
`bbrinkmann@cov.com
`Alexander A. Berengaut*
`aberengaut@cov.com
`Megan C. Keenan*
`mkeenan@cov.com
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`850 Tenth Street, NW
`Washington, DC 20001
`Telephone: +1 (202) 662-6000
`Facsimile: + 1 (202) 778-6000
`
`John E. Hall (SBN 118877)
`jhall@cov.com
`Anders Linderot*
`alinderot@cov.com
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`620 Eighth Avenue
`New York, New York 10018-1405
`Telephone: +1 (212) 841-1000
`Facsimile: + 1 (212) 841-1010
`
`Mitchell A. Kamin (SBN 202788)
`mkamin@cov.com
`Benjamin G. Cain (SBN 325122)**
`bcain@cov.com
`COVINGTON & BURLING LLP
`1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 3500
`Los Angeles, California 90067-4643
`Telephone: + 1 (424) 332-4800
`Facsimile: + 1 (424) 332-4749
`
`Attorneys for Plaintiffs
`
` *Pro hac vice application forthcoming
`**C.D. California admission forthcoming
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`WESTERN DIVISION
`TIKTOK INC. and BYTEDANCE LTD.,
`Case No. 2:20-cv-7672
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE
`Plaintiffs,
`AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`
`
`v.
`
`DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official
`capacity as President of the United States;
`WILBUR L. ROSS, JR., in his official
`capacity as Secretary of Commerce; and
`U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07672 Document 1 Filed 08/24/20 Page 2 of 39 Page ID #:2
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`Plaintiffs TikTok Inc. and ByteDance Ltd., for their Complaint against
`Defendants DONALD J. TRUMP, in his official capacity as President of the United
`States; WILBUR L. ROSS, JR., in his official capacity as Secretary of Commerce;
`and the U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; allege as follows:
`INTRODUCTION
`This action seeks to prevent the government from impermissibly
`1.
`banning TikTok, a mobile software application that 100 million Americans use to
`create and share short videos composed of expressive content. On August 6, 2020,
`President Trump issued an executive order banning this communication and
`information-sharing platform, without affording its owners—Plaintiffs TikTok Inc.
`and ByteDance Ltd.—due process of law and for political reasons rather than
`because of an “unusual and extraordinary threat” to the United States, which is a
`condition for the President to exercise his authority under the International
`Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”), 50 U.S.C. §§ 1701–1706. The
`President’s executive order is unconstitutional and ultra vires, and must be enjoined.
`IEEPA vests the President with significant power to prohibit certain
`2.
`transactions to protect U.S. national security. Past presidents have used this power
`responsibly to protect the country from genuine threats from abroad, including
`terrorism and the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Through this
`executive order, however, President Trump seeks to use IEEPA against TikTok Inc.,
`a U.S. company—headquartered in Los Angeles with hundreds of employees across
`the United States—to destroy an online community where millions of Americans
`have come together to express themselves, share video content, and make
`connections with each other. The order imposes these restrictions despite express
`limitations
`in IEEPA barring executive actions from restricting personal
`communications or the transmission of informational materials. The order also
`sweeps broadly to ban any transactions with TikTok Inc.’s parent company,
`ByteDance, even though the purported justification for the order is limited to the
`
`-1-
`COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07672 Document 1 Filed 08/24/20 Page 3 of 39 Page ID #:3
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`TikTok mobile application (“TikTok”), which is just one of ByteDance’s several
`businesses. The order is thus a gross misappropriation of IEEPA authority and a
`pretext for furthering the President’s broader campaign of anti-China rhetoric in the
`run-up to the U.S. election.
`The executive order seeks to ban TikTok purportedly because of the
`3.
`speculative possibility that the application could be manipulated by the Chinese
`government. But, as the U.S. government is well aware, Plaintiffs have taken
`extraordinary measures to protect the privacy and security of TikTok’s U.S. user
`data, including by having TikTok store such data outside of China (in the United
`States and Singapore) and by erecting software barriers that help ensure that TikTok
`stores its U.S. user data separately from the user data of other ByteDance products.
`These actions were made known to the U.S. government during a recent U.S.
`national security review of ByteDance’s 2017 acquisition of a China-based
`company, Musical.ly. As part of that review, Plaintiffs provided voluminous
`documentation to the U.S. government documenting TikTok’s security practices and
`made commitments that were more than sufficient to address any conceivable U.S.
`government privacy or national security concerns—even going so far as to be
`prepared to spin-out the U.S. TikTok business to trusted American investors.
`Ignoring these demonstrable facts and commitments, President
`4.
`Trump’s executive order authorizes the Secretary of Commerce to prohibit “any
`transaction” with ByteDance and its subsidiaries, including banning TikTok from
`operating in the United States. It is revealing that the President’s order took no
`account of the national security review process involving the Committee on Foreign
`Investment in the United States (“CFIUS” or “the Committee”) that was still pending
`at the time of the executive order. Instead, the order was issued abruptly after the
`President had proclaimed in a campaign-style news conference that TikTok Inc. had
`“no rights” and that he would ban TikTok if Plaintiffs did not pay money to the U.S.
`Treasury to secure the U.S. government’s approval for any sale. The President stated
`
`
`
`-2-
`COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07672 Document 1 Filed 08/24/20 Page 4 of 39 Page ID #:4
`
`
`that he would use his IEEPA authority to force TikTok to “close down” unless it is
`acquired through “an appropriate deal” in which “the Treasury . . . of the United
`States gets a lot of money.”1
`The executive order and, necessarily, any implementing regulations are
`5.
`unlawful and unconstitutional for a number of independent reasons:
`• By banning TikTok with no notice or opportunity to be heard (whether
`before or after the fact), the executive order violates the due process
`protections of the Fifth Amendment.
`• The order is ultra vires because it is not based on a bona fide national
`emergency and authorizes the prohibition of activities that have not
`been found to pose “an unusual and extraordinary threat.”
`• The order is ultra vires because its prohibitions sweep broadly to
`prohibit any transactions with ByteDance, although the purported threat
`justifying the order is limited to TikTok, just one of ByteDance’s
`businesses.
`• The order is ultra vires because it restricts personal communications
`and the transmission of informational materials, in direct violation of
`IEEPA.
`• IEEPA lacks any intelligible principle to guide or constrain the
`President’s action and thereby violates the non-delegation doctrine, as
`the President’s overbroad and unjustified claim of authority in this
`matter confirms.
`• By demanding that Plaintiffs make a payment to the U.S. Treasury as a
`condition for the sale of TikTok, the President has taken Plaintiffs’
`property without compensation in violation of the Fifth Amendment.
`• By preventing TikTok Inc. from operating in the United States the
`
` 1
`
` Fadel Allassan, Trump says TikTok will be banned if not sold by Sept. 15, demands
`cut of sale fee, Axios (Aug. 3, 2020), https://www.axios.com/trump-tiktok-banned-
`microsoft-fd45748d-1ee8-4f4a-812a-09ec76d6f8e2.html.
`
`-3-
`COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07672 Document 1 Filed 08/24/20 Page 5 of 39 Page ID #:5
`
`
`executive order violates TikTok Inc.’s First Amendment rights in its
`code, an expressive means of communication.
`Accordingly, ByteDance and TikTok Inc. seek a declaratory judgment
`6.
`and order invalidating and enjoining the executive order and any implementing
`regulations issued by the Department of Commerce.2
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`The Court has subject matter jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331
`7.
`because this action arises under the United States Constitution and the International
`Emergency Economic Powers Act (“IEEPA”), 50 U.S.C. §§ 1701–1706.
`The Court has authority to grant declaratory and injunctive relief
`8.
`pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 et seq.; 5 U.S.C. § 702;
`and the Court’s inherent equitable powers.
`Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(e)(1),
`9.
`because officers or employees of agencies of the United States acting in their official
`capacities and an agency of the United States are defendants, because Plaintiff
`TikTok Inc. has its principal place of business in this district, and because a
`substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to this action occurred in this
`district.
`
`PARTIES
`
`A. Plaintiffs
`10. Plaintiff TikTok Inc. is a company incorporated in California, with its
`principal place of business in Culver City, California.
`11. Plaintiff ByteDance Ltd. (“ByteDance”) is a global company
`incorporated in the Cayman Islands, with offices in the United States, China,
`Singapore, the United Kingdom, and India, among others. ByteDance owns and
`
` 2
`
` The order tasks the Department of Commerce with identifying the specific
`transactions to be banned by September 20, 2020, and with adopting rules and
`regulations as may be necessary to implement the order. Plaintiffs intend to amend
`this complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a)(1)(A) and move for a preliminary
`injunction after the regulations are issued.
`
`-4-
`COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07672 Document 1 Filed 08/24/20 Page 6 of 39 Page ID #:6
`
`
`operates a variety of mobile software applications that enable people around the
`world to connect with, consume, and create entertainment content, including
`TikTok. ByteDance also owns and operates other applications that are available in
`the United States, such as CapCut, a video editing application, and Lark, a
`collaboration and communications software product.
`B. Defendants
`12. Defendant Donald J. Trump is the President of the United States.
`President Trump made the decision to ban TikTok and issue the August 6, 2020
`executive order, purportedly acting under authority of IEEPA.
`13. Defendant Wilbur T. Ross, Jr. is the Secretary of Commerce and is sued
`in his official capacity. President Trump’s executive order tasks Secretary Ross with
`identifying the transactions subject to the order and authorizes him to implement the
`order through regulations.
`14. The Department of Commerce is the cabinet department of the federal
`government responsible for implementing the executive order.
`FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
`TikTok’s Global Success Has Resulted From Private-Sector
`Entrepreneurial Innovation.
`
`I.
`
`15. TikTok is an inclusive communication platform for making and sharing
`short-form videos through the TikTok mobile application. It encourages users to
`celebrate what makes them unique, while finding a community that does the same.
`TikTok Inc.’s mission is to inspire creativity and bring joy. It strives to build a global
`community, in which users can create and share authentically, discover the world
`around them, and connect with others across the globe.3
`16. The TikTok application enables users to create and upload short videos
`that are fifteen seconds to one minute in duration. In this respect, TikTok operates
`
` 3
`
` TikTok, Our Mission, https://www.tiktok.com/about?lang=en (last visited Aug.
`21, 2020).
`
`
`-5-
`COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07672 Document 1 Filed 08/24/20 Page 7 of 39 Page ID #:7
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`much like other digital application platforms such as Snapchat, YouTube, and
`Instagram, in that users create and post content on the platform. TikTok offers
`features such as background music and augmented reality effects, but users control
`which features to pair with the content of their self-directed videos, and TikTok
`serves as a host for the content created by its users.
`17. The TikTok application began as a product of private-sector
`entrepreneurship. In 2012, 29-year-old entrepreneur Yiming Zhang founded TikTok
`Inc.’s parent corporation, ByteDance. ByteDance is owned by Zhang and a number
`of major global institutional investors based in the United States, including Sequoia,
`General Atlantic, Coatue, and SIG. No foreign government, or person controlled by
`or acting on behalf of a foreign government, owns any significant interest or any
`other affirmative or negative rights or powers in ByteDance.
`18. Since founding ByteDance, Zhang has developed multiple products and
`services, including TikTok, many of which are operated through subsidiaries and
`affiliates—such as TikTok Inc. in the United States. TikTok is not offered in China,
`where ByteDance operates a similar but separate video-sharing platform called
`Douyin.
`19. TikTok’s user base has grown at a rapid pace in the United States. By
`January 2018, TikTok had 11,262,970 U.S. monthly active users. By February 2019,
`TikTok’s base more than doubled, with a total of 26,739,143 U.S. monthly active
`users. By October of that same year, TikTok’s total number of U.S. monthly active
`users had climbed to 39,897,768. And by June 2020, TikTok’s total number of U.S.
`monthly active users had soared to 91,937,040. Today, based on quarterly usage,
`100 million Americans use the TikTok application.
`20. TikTok’s growth in the United States paralleled its expansion
`worldwide. By January 2018, TikTok had 54,793,729 global monthly active users.
`By December of that year, TikTok had 271,188,301 global monthly active users.
`And one year later, in December 2019, TikTok had 507,552,660 global monthly
`
`
`
`-6-
`COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07672 Document 1 Filed 08/24/20 Page 8 of 39 Page ID #:8
`
`
`active users. As of July 2020, TikTok had 689,174,209 global monthly active users,
`and by August 2020, TikTok surpassed two billion global downloads.
`21. As a result of its rapid growth and success, TikTok has become
`available in more than 200 countries, and it currently has approximately 50 million
`daily active users in the United States. TikTok has grown largely because of its
`appeal to those who value the blend of light entertainment, creativity, and humor
`that the application provides.
`22. TikTok is also used by its users to discuss more serious subjects,
`including political issues. “Society’s struggles are on full display in TikTok,”
`including in the many posts about “the tragic death of George Floyd[,] LGBTQ
`awareness[,] and tributes to healthcare workers [] who are on the frontlines of
`COVID-19.”4 As of August 24, 2020, TikTok users had amassed approximately 6.8
`million views of posts with the hashtag #RIPJohnLewis, 230.3 million views of posts
`about #Juneteenth, and 20.3 billion views of posts about #BlackLivesMatter. 5
`Prominent TikTok users like Sarah Cooper have attracted millions of views based
`on posts that satirize the President, as have posts with hashtags such as
`#MakeAmericaGreatAgain and #BuildThatWall.6 And TikTok users claimed they
`used TikTok to coordinate mass ticket reservations for the President’s re-election
`
` 4
`
` Gene Del Vecchio, TikTok Is Pure Self-Expression. This Is Your Must-Try
`Sampler., Forbes (June 6, 2020), https://www.forbes.com/sites/genedelvecchio/
`2020/06/06/tiktok-is-pure-self-expression-this-is-your-must-try-
`sampler/#4e40f1f15a09.
`5 TikTok, #RIPJohnLewis, https://www.tiktok.com/tag/RIPJohnLewis?lang=en
`(last visited Aug. 24, 2020); TikTok, #Juneteenth, https://www.tiktok.com/
`tag/Juneteenth?lang=en (last visited Aug. 24, 2020); TikTok, #BlackLivesMatter,
`https://www.tiktok.com/tag/BlackLivesMatter?lang=en (last visited Aug. 24, 2020).
`6 Charles Trepany, Who is Sarah Cooper? Viral Trump Impersonator appears at
`DNC, bags TV specials, USA Today (Aug. 20, 2020), https://www.usatoday.com/
`story/entertainment/celebrities/2020/07/21/trump-impersonator-sarah-cooper-
`reflects-viral-social-media-stardom/5483534002/; TikTok, #MakeAmericaGreat
`Again, https://www.tiktok.com/tag/MakeAmericaGreatAgain?lang=en (last visited
`Aug. 23, 2020) (approximately 104.5 million views); TikTok, #BuildThatWall,
`https://www.tiktok.com/tag/BuildThatWall?lang=en (last visited Aug. 23, 2020).
`
`
`
`-7-
`COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07672 Document 1 Filed 08/24/20 Page 9 of 39 Page ID #:9
`
`
`campaign rally in Tulsa, which inflated projected attendance in the days leading up
`to the event.7 Several American politicians are verified users on TikTok, including
`Governor Michael DeWine of Ohio, Senator Ed Markey of Massachusetts, Governor
`Gavin Newsom of California, and Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont.
`23. TikTok is an economic lifeline for many of its users, especially during
`the COVID-19 pandemic. TikTok has given rise to new, non-traditional social
`media celebrities—“many of them working-class folks . . . in villages far from []
`cosmopolitan megacities”—and has become “a livelihood for some people,”
`providing “fame, empowerment and even a path out of poverty.”8
`II. TikTok Has Implemented Safeguards to Help Protect the Privacy and
`Security of U.S. User Data.
`
`24. Maintaining a safe and supportive environment for its users is a critical
`priority for Plaintiffs. TikTok’s business model rests on the principle that a safe
`environment is essential to helping people feel comfortable with expressing
`themselves openly and creatively. Plaintiffs also aim to cultivate an environment
`for authentic interactions by working to keep deceptive content and accounts off
`TikTok.
`25. TikTok has been structured to help protect the privacy and security of
`U.S. user data. Those protections begin with TikTok’s practices in collecting user
`data. TikTok collects limited data from its users in accordance with its privacy
`policy.9 For user data that is collected, TikTok prioritizes its secure storage. The
`current version of TikTok made available in the United States (i.e., the version
`
` 7
`
` Taylor Lorenz et al, TikTok Teens and K-Pop Stans Say They Sank Trump Rally,
`N.Y. Times (July 11, 2020), https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/21/style/tiktok-
`trump-rally-tulsa.html.
`8 Sushmita Pathak, ‘TikTok Changed My Life’: India’s Ban On Chinese App Leaves
`Video Makers Stunned, NPR (July 16, 2020), https://www.npr.org/2020/
`07/16/890382893/tiktok-changed-my-life-india-s-ban-on-chinese-app-leaves-
`video-makers-stunned.
`9 TikTok, Privacy Policy (last updated Jan. 1, 2020), https://www.tiktok.com/
`legal/privacy-policy?lang=en.
`
`
`-8-
`COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07672 Document 1 Filed 08/24/20 Page 10 of 39 Page ID #:10
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`principally affected by Defendant’s unlawful ban and the version on which this
`complaint focuses) stores all U.S. user data on servers in the United States and
`Singapore, where it is segregated from data relating to other ByteDance products
`and services by software-based controls. TikTok does not store any U.S. user data
`in China.
`26. While it is in storage, the following U.S. user data is currently encrypted
`using the industry-standard key management service (“KMS”) encryption algorithm
`(AES 256 GCM), which is operated by TikTok’s U.S. security team: names,
`birthdays, home addresses, phone numbers, emails, passwords, PayPal account
`information, contact list, private videos, direct messages, and certain fields of the
`log-in history.
`27. The KMS algorithm also generates secret keys required to access
`encrypted data, and these keys are managed by the U.S. security team, under the
`control and direction of Roland Cloutier, the U.S.-based Global Chief Security
`Officer. ByteDance’s China-based engineering personnel supporting TikTok may
`access these encrypted data elements in decrypted form based on demonstrated need
`and if they receive permission under the Data Access Approval Process, which is
`managed by TikTok’s U.S.-based team.
`28. TikTok has additional internal controls in place to prevent keys that
`decrypt U.S. user data from being accessed by ByteDance personnel without
`authorization from the U.S. security team. TikTok regularly conducts code audits
`and internal reviews of access to data to help ensure that no unauthorized access to
`U.S. user data takes place, and it has not identified any purposeful breach of security
`controls.
`In addition to its storage security practices, TikTok takes steps to secure
`29.
`and encrypt user data while it is being transmitted. TikTok currently uses Hypertext
`Transfer Protocol Secure (“HTTPS”) by default for transmission of user data in the
`United States, the same industry-standard protocol used by major U.S. banks and
`
`
`
`-9-
`COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07672 Document 1 Filed 08/24/20 Page 11 of 39 Page ID #:11
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`e-commerce platforms to secure their online transactions.
`30. TikTok is committed to continually strengthening its data privacy
`policies to protect its users, to maintain sponsors’ trust, and to comply with
`applicable legal and regulatory standards. TikTok regularly reviews its security
`protections to identify and remediate any potential vulnerabilities. This is part of a
`mature software development lifecycle program that involves both automatic and
`manual review of security controls at multiple points in the development process.
`TikTok also has a vulnerability reporting policy that invites security researchers to
`disclose information about vulnerabilities,10 and it relies on respected American
`third-party vendors to validate its security controls and help ensure that U.S. user
`data is not subject to security vulnerabilities.
`In addition to safeguarding TikTok user data against data breaches,
`31.
`hackers, and other malicious actors, TikTok has security controls designed to protect
`the integrity of its source code. For example, employees must demonstrate a need
`for information before they can access TikTok source code. Even upon a showing
`of such a need, the employee still must obtain appropriate authorization to access the
`source code, and security controls embedded in the network monitor the employee’s
`review and activities. TikTok has also repeatedly engaged internal engineers and
`third-party vendors to perform quality and security checks and conduct intensive
`code reviews to help ensure that no back doors exist in TikTok’s source code.
`32. TikTok has reinforced its commitment to prioritizing the privacy and
`security concerns of U.S. users by placing U.S.-based executives in key leadership
`positions that shape the direction of the company. TikTok is led by a senior
`management team located in the United States. Its Chief Executive Officer, General
`Manager, Global Chief Security Officer, U.S. Head of Safety, and General Counsel
`
`
`
`10 TikTok, Report Security Vulnerabilities, https://support.tiktok.com/en/privacy-
`safety/reportsecurityvulnerabilities-default#:~:text=Coordinated%20Disclosure%
`20Policy%20as%20defined,submission%2C%20whichever%20is%20sooner.%22.
`
`
`
`-10-
`COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07672 Document 1 Filed 08/24/20 Page 12 of 39 Page ID #:12
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`are all U.S.-based persons. These U.S.-based leaders came to TikTok from
`leadership positions in prominent U.S. companies like the Walt Disney Company,
`ADP, YouTube, and Microsoft.11
`33. TikTok Inc. has broadened its commitment to hiring U.S. personnel
`beyond the highest levels of leadership as well, including by hiring dozens of highly
`qualified individuals with experience at leading U.S. technology companies. TikTok
`has also established a fully staffed content moderation team in the United States to
`oversee all content moderation decisions for U.S. users. And Plaintiffs have
`announced plans to add approximately 10,000 jobs in the United States over the next
`three years.12
`34. TikTok’s U.S.-based leadership team has consistently stressed its
`commitment to prioritizing U.S. data privacy and security.13 Most recently, on July
`29, 2020, TikTok announced the launch of its Transparency and Accountability
`Center for moderation and data practices, which will enable experts to “observe our
`moderation policies in real-time, as well as examine the actual code that drives our
`algorithms.” As the announcement explained, this act of transparency is
`unparalleled by other major social media companies and “puts [TikTok] a step ahead
`of the industry.”14
`35. As these efforts reflect, Plaintiffs are committed to appropriately
`safeguarding U.S. user data against unauthorized access from outside the United
`
`
`
`11 Brooks Barnes & Jack Nicas, Disney’s Head of Streaming Is New TikTok C.E.O.,
`N.Y.
`Times
`(May
`18,
`2020),
`https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/18/
`business/media/tiktok-ceo-kevin-mayer.html.
`12 Reuters, TikTok plans to add 10,000 jobs in U.S. over next three years (July 21,
`2020), https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tiktok-jobs/tiktok-plans-to-add-10000-
`jobs-in-u-s-over-next-three-years-idUSKCN24M1S9.
`13 Vanessa Pappas, Explaining TikTok’s approach in the US, TikTok (Nov. 5, 2019),
`https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-us/explaining-tiktoks-approach-in-the-us.
`14 Kevin Mayer, Fair competition and transparency benefits us all, TikTok (July 29,
`2020),
`https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-us/fair-competition-and-transparency-
`benefits-us-all.
`
`
`-11-
`COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07672 Document 1 Filed 08/24/20 Page 13 of 39 Page ID #:13
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`States—including by any foreign government. TikTok is not and has never been
`offered in China. There is no connection between TikTok and the Chinese
`government. Nor does the Chinese government exert any control over TikTok Inc.
`through its parent company, ByteDance. The key personnel responsible for TikTok,
`including its CEO, Global Chief Security Officer, and General Counsel, are all
`Americans based in the United States—and therefore are not subject to Chinese law.
`U.S. content moderation is likewise led by a U.S.-based team and operates
`independently from China, and, as noted above, the TikTok application stores U.S.
`user data on servers located in the United States and Singapore.
`36. Neither TikTok Inc. nor ByteDance provides TikTok user data to the
`Chinese government, and the Chinese government has never asked for data on
`TikTok users or to moderate TikTok content. Plaintiffs would reject any such
`request.
`III. Plaintiffs Proactively Engaged with the U.S. Government and Sought to
`Address Any Conceivable National Security Concerns.
`
`37. As the foregoing reflects, as TikTok has grown, it has continued to
`refine and strengthen its data privacy protections and has done so voluntarily,
`reflecting its ongoing commitment to U.S. users. As part of these efforts, Plaintiffs
`have also sought proactively to engage with the U.S. Government to anticipate and
`address any concerns it might have. These efforts have included responding
`separately and diligently to inquiries from CFIUS.
`38. CFIUS is the regulatory body tasked with reviewing foreign
`acquisitions of U.S. businesses to determine their impact on national security.
`CFIUS reviews transactions to identify and address any unresolved national security
`concerns they might pose to the United States. If CFIUS identifies such a risk that
`cannot be adequately and appropriately addressed by other legal authorities, the
`Committee or a lead agency may, on behalf of the Committee, negotiate, enter into
`or impose, and enforce any agreement or condition with any party to the covered
`
`
`
`-12-
`COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07672 Document 1 Filed 08/24/20 Page 14 of 39 Page ID #:14
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`transaction in order to mitigate any risk to the national security of the United States
`that arises as a result of the covered transaction. Under its governing statute, CFIUS
`may refer a transaction to the President if CFIUS is unable to identify adequate and
`appropriate mitigation, i.e., mitigation measures that it believes (a) can successfully
`address the identified risk, (b) allow for verifiable compliance, and (c) can be
`effectively monitored and enforced, consistent with the requirements of 50 U.S.C.
`§ 4565(l)(3)(C). The President is ultimately empowered to prohibit covered
`transactions that pose threats to national security that cannot be adequately and
`appropriately addressed through other authorities.
`In 2019, CFIUS contacted ByteDance to consider whether to review its
`39.
`acquisition of Musical.ly, a China-based video-sharing platform—even though
`Musical.ly was based in China and had very limited assets in the United States. This
`review was highly unusual in that ByteDance had acquired Musical.ly two years
`earlier in 2017, Musical.ly was previously Chinese-owned and based in China, and
`ByteDance had predominantly abandoned Musical.ly’s limited U.S. assets by the
`time of CFIUS’s outreach in 2019. Nevertheless, in March 2020, after months of
`evaluating its jurisdiction, CFIUS advised ByteDance that it intended to conduct a
`formal review of the acquisition of Musical.ly, and on June 15, 2020, CFIUS
`initiated that review. This lengthy deliberation by a U.S. government institution
`comprised of national security professionals simply underscores that, in fact, there
`was no national emergency in relation to TikTok or ByteDance’s acquisition of
`Musical.ly.
`40. The Musical.ly acquisition did not affect—let alone undermine—
`TikTok Inc.’s commitments to the security and privacy of its U.S. user data, nor did
`it create any national security concerns. In fact, after acquiring Musical.ly in 2017,
`ByteDance and TikTok migrated Musical.ly users to TikTok and, as noted above,
`effectively abandoned the Musical.ly code, brand, and business. And since the
`Musical.ly acquisition, ByteDance and TikTok Inc. have sought to base more of the
`
`
`
`-13-
`COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF
`
`

`

`Case 2:20-cv-07672 Document 1 Filed 08/24/20 Page 15 of 39 Page ID #:15
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`TikTok business, including the user data, in the United States.
`41. CFIUS nevertheless initiated a review of the Musical.ly acquisition,
`following, as noted, a lengthy period of evaluating whether there was a basis for such
`a review. During this perio

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket