throbber
Case 2:21-cv-06434 Document 1 Filed 08/10/21 Page 1 of 5 Page ID #:1
`
`
`
`
`
`Amir Shlesinger (SBN 204132)
`ashlesinger@reedsmith.com
`Michelle L. Cheng (SBN 239711)
`mcheng@reedsmith.com
`Charles P. Hyun (SBN 307817)
`chyun@reedsmith.com
`REED SMITH LLP
`355 South Grand Avenue, Suite 2900
`Los Angeles, CA 90071-1514
`Telephone: +1 213 457 8000
`Facsimile: +1 213 457 8080
`Attorneys for Defendant Health Care
`Service Corporation, a mutual legal reserve
`company, doing business in Illinois as Blue
`Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION
`
` Case No.: 2:21-cv-06434
`
`[Removal from Superior Court of
`California, Los Angeles County, Case
`No. 21TRCV00333]
`
`NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF CIVIL
`ACTION UNDER 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332
`AND 1441
`
`
`[Filed concurrently with (1) Civil Cover
`Sheet; (2) Declaration of David Culberg;
`and (3) Certification and Notice of
`Interested Parties]
`
`
`
`
`Plaintiffs,
`
`
`RAMIN M. ROOHIPOUR, M.D., INC., a
`California corporation; and R&R
`SURGICAL INSTITUTE, an
`unincorporated association;
`
`
`
`
`vs.
`
`BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF
`ILLINOIS, an Illinois Corporation; and
`DOES 1 through 20, inclusive;
`
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO.: 2:21-cv-06434
`ROOHIPOUR V. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
` NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF CIVIL ACTION
`UNDER 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 AND 1441
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
`
`REED SMITH LLP
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-06434 Document 1 Filed 08/10/21 Page 2 of 5 Page ID #:2
`
`TO THE CLERK OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR
`THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA:
``
`PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant Health Care Service Corporation,
`a mutual legal reserve company, doing business in Illinois as Blue Cross and Blue
`Shield of Illinois (“HCSC”), erroneously sued as BLUECROSS SHIELD OF
`ILLINOIS, hereby gives notice of its removal of the above-captioned action, currently
`pending in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los
`Angeles, to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. As
`set out more fully below, this case is a civil action over which this Court has
`jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and is one that may be removed to this
`Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b) because it is a civil action between citizens of
`different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.
`In compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a), HCSC asserts the following grounds
`for removal:
`I.
`REMOVAL IS PROPER BECAUSE THIS NOTICE OF REMOVAL IS
`FILED TIMELY AND THIS COURT HAS SUBJECT MATTER
`JURISDICTION PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 AND 1441
`A.
`The Notice Of Removal Is Timely
`1.
`On April 28, 2021, Plaintiffs Ramin M. Roohipour, M.D., Inc. and R&R
`Surgical Institute (“Plaintiffs”) filed this action against HCSC with the filing of a
`Complaint (“Original Complaint”) in the Superior Court of California for the County
`of Los Angeles, in the case entitled Ramin M. Roohipour, M.D., Inc., et al. v. Blue
`Cross Blue Shield of Illinois, et al., as Case No. 21TRCV00333 (the “State Court
`Action”). Plaintiffs did not serve HCSC with the Original Complaint. A true and
`correct copy of the Original Complaint is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
`
`
`CASE NO.: 2:21-cv-06434
`ROOHIPOUR V. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
`
`
`– 1 –
` NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF CIVIL ACTION
`UNDER 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 AND 1441
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
`
`REED SMITH LLP
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-06434 Document 1 Filed 08/10/21 Page 3 of 5 Page ID #:3
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`2.
`On June 7, 2021, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) in
`the State Court Action. A true and correct copy of the FAC is attached hereto as
``
`Exhibit B.
`3.
`On or about July 1, 2021, Plaintiffs mailed a copy of the summons and
`FAC to HCSC at its address in Chicago, IL. The proof of service filed in the
`Superior Court Action reflects the FAC’s mail service date of July 2, 2021. Pursuant
`to California Code of Civil Procedure section 415.40: “A summons may be served on
`a person outside this state in any manner provided by this article or by sending a copy
`of the summons and of the complaint to the person to be served by first-class mail,
`postage prepaid, requiring a return receipt. Service of a summons by this form of mail
`is deemed complete on the 10th day after such mailing.”
`4.
`Therefore, this Notice of Removal is timely in that it was filed within
`thirty (30) days of the service of the FAC and less than a year after the
`commencement of the State Court Action. See 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b).
`B.
`There Exists a Diversity of Citizenship Between the Parties
`5.
`The State Court Action is a civil action of which this Court has original
`jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and is one that may be removed to this Court by
`Defendant pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(1) and 28 U.S.C. §
`1441(b) in that it is a civil action between citizens of different states and the amount in
`controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusive of interest and costs, and
`the State Court Action is being removed within one year of its filing in the Los
`Angeles Superior Court, in compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b).
`6.
`The citizenship of the parties is as follows:
`(a) Plaintiffs: Plaintiff Ramin M. Roohipour, M.D., Inc. is a
`
`California corporation with its principal place of business in the County of Los
`Angeles in the State of California, and therefore is a citizen of the State of California.
`FAC ¶1. Plaintiff R&R Surgical Institute is an unincorporated association with its
`
`
`CASE NO.: 2:21-cv-06434
`ROOHIPOUR V. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
`
`
`– 2 –
` NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF CIVIL ACTION
`UNDER 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 AND 1441
`
`
`
`A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
`
`REED SMITH LLP
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-06434 Document 1 Filed 08/10/21 Page 4 of 5 Page ID #:4
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`principal place of business in the County of Los Angeles in the State of California,
`and therefore is also a citizen of the State of California. FAC ¶2.
``
`(b) Defendant HCSC: Defendant HCSC is an Illinois corporation
`
`with its principal place of business in Cook County in the State of Illinois, and
`therefore is a citizen of the State of Illinois. See Declaration of David Culberg, ¶ 3.
`7.
`The amount in controversy in the State Court Action exceeds $75,000.
`Plaintiffs allege that they submitted claims for reimbursement to HCSC in the
`following amounts, $80,000 for Patient A; $395,000 for Patient B; and $135,000 for
`Patient C were usual, customary and reasonable. See FAC ¶¶15-20, ¶¶24-29, ¶¶33-35,
`¶¶39-42, ¶¶45-48, ¶¶53-56. Plaintiffs allege that HCSC improperly reimbursed
`Plaintiffs in the amount of $4,123.33. See FAC ¶18, ¶20, ¶27, ¶29, ¶¶ 56.
`Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ FAC seeks damages of at least $605,876.67 for the alleged
`outstanding balance for the services rendered to the three patients. Id.
`8.
`Upon information and belief, Does 1-20 have not been named or served,
`and thus their consent is not required. See 28 U.S.C. § 1441(b)(1) (“In determining
`whether a civil action is removable on the basis of the jurisdiction under section
`1332(a) of this title, the citizenship of defendants sued under fictitious names shall be
`disregarded.”).
`9.
`Accordingly, this Court is vested with subject matter jurisdiction over
`this action because complete diversity exists between all Plaintiffs and Defendant, and
`the amount in controversy exceeds the jurisdictional amount set by 28 U.S.C. § 1332.
`II. VENUE
`10. The Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles is
`located within the United States District Court for the Central District of California,
`Western Division. See 28 U.S.C. § 84(c). Venue is proper in this Court because it is
`the “district and division embracing the place where such action is pending.” 28
`U.S.C. § 1441(a).
`
`
`CASE NO.: 2:21-cv-06434
`ROOHIPOUR V. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
`
`
`– 3 –
` NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF CIVIL ACTION
`UNDER 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 AND 1441
`
`
`
`A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
`
`REED SMITH LLP
`
`

`

`Case 2:21-cv-06434 Document 1 Filed 08/10/21 Page 5 of 5 Page ID #:5
`
`
`
`III. COMPLIANCE WITH 28 U.S.C § 1446
`11. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1446(a), a copy of all process, pleadings, and
``
`orders served on Defendant are attached to this Notice of Removal.
`12.
`In compliance with 28 U.S.C. § 1446(d), HCSC will serve on Plaintiffs
`and will file with the Clerk of the Superior Court of California for the County of Los
`Angeles a “Notice to the Clerk of the Superior Court and To Adverse Parties of Filing
`of Notice of Removal of Civil Action to Federal Court,” attaching a copy of this Notice
`of Removal.
`13. No previous application has been made for the relief requested herein.
`14. This Notice of Removal is signed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 11. See 28
`U.S.C. § 1446(a).
`15. Having complied with all statutory requirements, removal is appropriate.
`See, e.g., TPS Utilicom Servs. Inc. v. AT&T Corp., 223 F. Supp. 2d 1089, 1104 (C.D.
`Cal. 2002) (holding removal was proper on the basis of diversity jurisdiction); Boon v.
`Allstate Ins. Co., 229 F. Supp. 2d 1016, 1019-20 (C.D. Cal. 2002) (same).
`
`
`WHEREFORE, HCSC respectfully remove this action from the California
`Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§
`1332, 1441 and 1446.
`
`DATED: August 10, 2021
`
`REED SMITH LLP
`By: /s/ Amir Shlesinger
`Amir Shlesinger
`Michelle L. Cheng
`Charles P. Hyun
`Attorneys for Defendant Health Care
`Service Corporation, a mutual legal reserve
`company, doing business in Illinois as Blue
`Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois
`
`
`
`
`
`
`CASE NO.: 2:21-cv-06434
`ROOHIPOUR V. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD
`
`
`– 4 –
` NOTICE OF REMOVAL OF CIVIL ACTION
`UNDER 28 U.S.C. §§ 1332 AND 1441
`
`
`
`1
`2
`3
`4
`5
`6
`7
`8
`9
`10
`11
`12
`13
`14
`15
`16
`17
`18
`19
`20
`21
`22
`23
`24
`25
`26
`27
`28
`
`A limited liability partnership formed in the State of Delaware
`
`REED SMITH LLP
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket