throbber
Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 126 Filed 03/28/24 Page 1 of 11 Page ID #:807
`
`ShaheryarKhan
`
`2219 Olive street
`
`Burbank Ca 91506
`
`Plaintiff In proper
`
`U.S.
`
`• ~~ ;
`
`OF
`
`U NITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SHAHERYAR KHAN
`
`CASE NUMBER 2:22-CV-02333 11/I ~c/~~
`
`PLAINTIFF,
`
`ADAM KRAEMER ET AL
`
`DEFENDANTS,
`
`PLAINTIFFS Notice of Motion and motion to
`
`to set aside the courts order denial of order
`3/18/24 denying plainitffs extension to file the
`first amended complaint
`
`J UDGE: Maame Ewusi Mensah Frimpong
`
`DATE: August 29th 2024
`
`Time 10 AM
`
`CRTRM: 8 A 8TH FLOOR
`
`ACTION FILED: APRIL 7TH 2022
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 126 Filed 03/28/24 Page 2 of 11 Page ID #:808
`
`To the Honorable Court and to all parties Please take notice that on August 29th 2024 at 10 AM
`or soon there after as this matter may be heard in the above titled court located at 250 w 1st
`street los angeles ca 90012 courtroom 8A plaintiff seeks the court grant an order issued on
`3/18/24 to reconsider /set aside order denying plaintiff extension to file First amedned
`complaint .
`
`Plaintiff Respectfully files this motion based upon irreprable harm and prejudice plaintiff will
`suffer if not granted. Plaintiff respectfully supplys these new facts and new information
`unavailable at the time due to plaintiffs due to illness at the time and plaintiffs own incapcity
`and in avaiability of facts at the time prior to this motion beling filed
`
`Plaintiff will file documetns to support this claim including points and authoity ,declarations ,
`oral testimony and expert witmess testimony as may be allowed at the hearing of this motion
`a nd wishes the court to leave to amend additional supplemental pleadings when avaiable up
`unit) the court date. Plaintiff contends that plaintiff will disclose the names of expert testimony
`or declaration when expert winesses are avaiable and they are hired and made available to
`support plaintiff claims in this motion before the court date and rewires their testimony and
`declaration at the hearing on the hearing date unless an order granting my motion is provided
`prior to that date.
`
`The court has granted an extension before however the plaintiff was victem of hacking recenly
`affecting plaintiffs ability to file prepared work relevant to completing the first amended
`complaint .Plaintiff was victem to an espionage tactic tampering with plaintiffs council there he
`was going to hire and had to let go of this attorney. Plainitff was still incapiciated and suffered
`from life threatenig illness in these last 3 months . Plainitff will suffer irreprable harm and be
`unable to comply with business requirmet with the Attonrye Generals office and business
`contracts and will suffer liability from losses should this court not grant this motion so that the
`plainitff can obtaion judgmentsd and monitary damages to satisy those responsibilites.
`
`Plaintiff will leave to amend this motion as Plaintifff did not see the courts order until recently
`3/24/24 . Plaintiff request the court allow for continuity and plaintiff rights to allow shortned
`time to file this motion within 10 days of the order filed by the court on 3/18/24.
`
`Plaintiff respectfully understands will supply a first amended complaint prior to the court date
`captioned above or not too long out.
`
`plaintiff will suffer as he will not be able to perform in his contracts and remedy losses though a
`judgment or order in plaintiffs favor
`
`.Plaintiff will provide evidecne and expert witness testimony and declaration to confiorm and
`support this statement and motion
`
`Plaintiff will submit expert witness testimony and exhibits and delaration and supplment
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 126 Filed 03/28/24 Page 3 of 11 Page ID #:809
`
`briefings to support this motion and wishes leave to amend
`
`This motion is made following the conference of council pursuant to LR 7-3 .
`
`Plaintiff respectfully submits this application and hope s that the court renders the decision
`after review of the defendnats opposition in plaintiffs favor
`
`declare under the penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`3/28/24
`
`' V"
`
`x ~~
`
`Plaintiff Shaheryar Khan in Pro Per
`
`3
`
`

`

`1—~X (-+ i t'3 r ~ s
`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 126 Filed 03/28/24 Page 4 of 11 Page ID #:810
`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 125 Filed 03/18/24 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:804
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CIVIL MINUTES —GENERAL
`
`Case No. 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS
`
`Date: March 18, 2024
`
`Title
`
`Shahervar Khan v. Adam Kraemer, et al.
`
`Present: The Honorable: Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong
`
`Damon Berry
`Deputy Clerk
`
`Not Reported
`Court Reporter /Recorder
`
`Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
`
`Attorneys Present for Defendants:
`
`Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: Plaintiff s Notice and Application for Ex
`Parte Motion for An Extension of Time to File First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 95]
`
`The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff Shaheryar Khan's Ex Parte Application for an
`Extension of Time to File First Amended Complaint (ECF Nos. 115, 120, 122) and Amended Ex
`Pane Application for Extension of Time to File First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 123,
`collectively, the "Ex Parte Filings"), as well as Defendant Google LLC's Opposition to
`Shaheryar Khan's Ex Parte Motion for an Extension of time to File an Amended Complaint
`(ECF No. 118).
`
`In the Central District, a party seeking ex pane relief must comply with (1) the Local
`Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and (2) the standards set forth in Mission Power
`Engineering Co. v. Continental Casualty Co., 883 F. Supp. 488, 492 (C.D. Cal. 1995).
`
`Local Rule 7-19.1 requires a party filing an ex pane application to:
`
`L.R. 7-19 Ex Parte Application. An application for an ex pane order shall be
`accompanied by a memorandum containing, if known, the name, address,
`telephone number and e-mail address of counsel for the opposing party, the
`reasons for the seeking of an ex pane order, and points and authorities in support
`thereof. An applicant also shall lodge the proposed ex pane order.
`
`CV-90 (03/15)
`
`Civil Minutes —General
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 126 Filed 03/28/24 Page 5 of 11 Page ID #:811
`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 125 Filed 03/18/24 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:805
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CIVIL MINUTES —GENERAL
`
`Case No. 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS
`
`Date: March 18, 2024
`
`Title
`
`Shahervar Khan v. Adam Kraemer, et al.
`
`L.R. 7-19.1 Notice of Application. It shall be the duty of the attorney so applying
`(a) to make reasonable, good faith efforts orally to advise counsel for all other
`parties, if known, of the date and substance of the proposed ex pane application
`and (b) to advise the Court in writing and under oath of efforts to contact other
`counsel and whether any other counsel, after such advice, opposes the application.
`C.D. Cal. R. 7-19, 7-19.1. l
`
`Here, several of Khan's Ex Parte Filings all indicate that Khan reached out to opposing
`counsel to alert them about the ex pane filings prior to filing. See, e.g., ECF No. 115 at 2-3, ECF
`No. 123 at 2. Thus, Khan has complied with the notice portion of Local Rule 7-19.1
`
`Under Mission Power, a party seeking ex parte relief must establish (1) that the
`requesting party will be irreparably prejudiced if the motion is heard on a normal schedule and
`(2) that the requesting party did not create the crisis requiring ex pane relief.
`
`Here, Khan does not explicitly discuss the prejudice he would face if his motion were
`heard in accordance with regular procedures. However, the Court notes that Khan asks for an
`extension to file his First Amended Complaint ("FAC"), see e.g., ECF No. 115 at 2, that would
`moot the pending motions to dismiss, which could be granted with prejudice. See ECF No. 66.
`Thus, it is conceivable that Khan could be irreparably prejudiced.
`
`However, the second Mission Power factor does not weigh in Khan's favor. Khan has
`moved several times to extend the deadline to file his FAC—originally April 21, 2023, almost a
`full year ago. Khan states that more time is necessary because he needs to retain counsel and re-
`draft his FAC due to a hacking incident. ECF No. 115 at 2. While the hacking incident is new,
`each of Khan's prior requests have reiterated Khan's need to secure counsel. Khan also states
`that he is still under treatment for his medical conditions. ECF No. 115 at 2. Although the Court
`understands that medical issues are beyond Khan's control, the deadline cannot be extended
`indefinitely until Khan's personal health issues are resolved. The Court has provided Khan with
`ample time—a little over 10 months measured from April 25, 2023, the date the Court granted
`Khan's first ex pane, to present day—to procure counsel and file a FAC. The Court thus
`
`' Pro se litigants must comply with the Local Rules. L.R. 83-2.2.3.
`
`CV-90 (03/15)
`
`Civil Minutes —General
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 126 Filed 03/28/24 Page 6 of 11 Page ID #:812
`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 125 Fil~ri 03/18/24 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:806
`
`UNITED STA`fES DISTRI~` ~ COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CA.I_,[FORNIA
`
`CIVIL MINUTES —GENERAL
`
`Case No. 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS
`
`Date: March 18, 2024
`
`Tit(e
`
`Shahervar Khan v. Adam Kraemer, et al.
`
`DENIES Khan's Ex Parte Filings. The Court will issue a separate order setting a hearing on the
`pending motions to dismiss.
`
`Initials of Preparer DBE
`
`CV-90 (03/15)
`
`Civil Minutes —General
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 126 Filed 03/28/24 Page 7 of 11 Page ID #:813
`
`DATE: 3/26/2024
`
`RE Meet and ConferAttention Every Well And Google Defendants:
`
`Susman Godfrey : K. Pachman Fax 310 789-3150
`
`Perkins Coie Alisha Burgin Fax 310-788-3399
`
`Case Number 2:22 CV 02333 Shaheryar Khan vs Adam Kramer; Google; Apple ;Everly Well Et AI
`
`Plaintiff planning to file a motion to reconsider or set aside the courts ruling on 3/18/ 24
`denying plaintiffs motion to extend time to file first amedned complaint
`
`Due to severe illness and medical treatment and deadly infection .Plaintiff need to tend to
`immediatley and recover from infection which became worse thorugh today .Plaintiff was not
`cleared medically through this time and the court was unclear about this. Plaintiff still has life
`threatending matter related to the 1/29/24 notice to Defendnats and will continue to seek
`medical treatment.
`
`Plaintiff also found issues with council which the court did not know about that will be plead
`into this motion.
`
`Plainitff will be preudiced due to unfair business practices by the defendants act desptroying
`court materials of plaintiff and the requirement to amend issues retaled to federal
`investigation.
`
`Plaintiiff will be require to have expert witness testimony and issue before the cout for this
`hearing as well to testify and present declaratrion evidence.
`
`Judge Frimpong issued an order requesting that any communication should be conducted in
`accordance to Federal Rules which Plaintiff intneds to follow,
`
`Plaintiff also would like to discuss and seek a stipulation if possible or settlement
`
`Please Email me at syst.82817@outlook.com to set a time to meet and confer to dicsuss this
`
`issue and feel free to email any agreeements that defendnats council may be agreeable to ton
`
`the information in the above request. After noon tomorrow will work or Thursday before noon
`also can work this week.
`
`Respectfully
`
`Shaheryar Khan
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 126 Filed 03/28/24 Page 8 of 11 Page ID #:814
`
`Khan v. Google et al. {2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS)
`
`Taylor Rodgers, Torryn (Perkins Coie) <TRodgers@perkinscoie.com>
`Tue 3/Z6/2024 9:29 PM
`
`TG
`Cc:Burgin, Alisha C. (Perkins Coie) <ABurgin@perkinscoie.com>
`
`M r. Khan,
`
`As you know, we are counsel for Google in this matter. I am writing per your request to meet and confer regarding
`your fax that we received today. Please feel free to give me a call tomorrow after noon, or Friday morning. You
`can reach me at 415-344-7122.
`
`Thank yau,
`Torryn
`
`Torryn Rodgers ~ Perkins Core LLP
`ASSOCIATE
`
`She/herlhers
`
`505 Howard Street Suite 1000
`
`San Francisco. CA 94105
`
`D. +1.415.344.7122
`
`F. +1.415.344.7322
`
`E. TRodgers ,perkinscoie.com
`
`tVOTiCE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply
`
`email and immediately delete the message and any atta~~hments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 126 Filed 03/28/24 Page 9 of 11 Page ID #:815
`
`Khan v. Kraemer
`
`Krysta Pachman <KPachman@susmangodfrey.com>
`Tue 3/26/2024 8:37 PM
`
`To.
`Mr. Khan,
`
`received your fax.
`
`I'm not available tomorrow afternoon. I'm available Thursday before 10 a.m. Please feel free to call me
`then. If you are unable to reach me, you can note in your papers that Everly Well opposes the relief you
`are seeking.
`
`Best,
`Krysta
`
`Krysta Kauble Pachman ~ Partner ~ Susman Godfrey L.L.P.
`
`1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400, Los Angeles, CA 90067
`
`(310) 789-3118 ~ kpachinan(~;susmangodfrey.com
`
`This e-mail contains privileged and confidential information, which may be subject to the attorney/client privilege and/or attorney work
`product protection. If you received this message in etTor, please notify the sender and delete it immediately.
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 126 Filed 03/28/24 Page 10 of 11 Page ID #:816
`
`SPINE AND SPORTS INSTITUTE
`
`PAYAM VAHEDIFAR, M.D.
`
`WORK NOTE
`
`Patient Name: Shah Khan DOB: 07/05/1974
`
`May return to work on:
`
`q May return to regular work full time
`
`q May return to regular work, but should avoid heavy lifting (over 201bs.)
`
`q May return to light work
`
`q May return to work
`
`hours per day
`
`q May resume light work and gradually do heavier work as time progresses
`
`q Ma esume light work with restrictions as listed:
`
`Other: The patient will remain off of work from 2-28-2024 - 5-24-2024
`
`,/~ ~-~~~
`Signed:
`Payam Vahedifar, M.D.
`
`Date: 03/14/2024
`
`...............................................................................................................................................................................................................
`ENCINO
`16633 Ventura Blvd Suite 802
`Encino, CA 91436
`P:818.986.020 F: 818.986.4393
``o
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 126 Filed 03/28/24 Page 11 of 11 Page ID #:817
`
`1
`
`~
`
`SPINE AND SPORTS INSTITUTE
`PAYAM VAHEDIFAR, M.D.
`
`WORK NOTE
`
`Patient Name: Shah Khan DOB: 07/05/1974
`
`Patient to remain off work from 1 1/18/2023 thru 02/28/2024.
`If you have any questions, please call the office at 818-986-0200
`
`Signed: f~ Y
`Payam Vahedifar, M.D.
`
`Date: 11 /30/2023
`
`.........................................................................................................................................................................................................
`ENCINO
`16633 Ventura Blvd Suite 802
`Encino, CA 91436
`P:818.986.0200 F: 818.986.4393
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket