throbber
Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 128 Filed 04/01/24 Page 1 of 15 Page ID #:838
`
`F ILGv
`
`u.s. o►sTRi
`~ 2 a ~~
`
`ShaheryarKhan
`
`2219 Olive street
`
`Burbank Ca 91506
`
`Plaintiff In proper
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`SHAHERYAR KHAN
`
`CASE NUMBER 2:22-CV-02333 1~, ~1/~ ~'
`
`PLAINTIFF,
`
`ADAM KRAEMER ET AL
`
`DEFENDANTS,
`
`MEMORANDUM AND POINTS OF AUTHORITY
`
`PLAINTIFFS Notice of Motion and motion to
`
`to set aside the courts order denial of order
`3/18/24 denying plainitffs extension to file the
`first amended complaint
`
`JUDGE: Maame Ewusi Mensah Frimpong
`
`DATE: August 29th 2024
`
`Time 10 AM
`
`CRTRM: 8 A 8TH FLOOR
`
`ACTION FILED: APRIL 7TH 2022
`
`1
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 128 Filed 04/01/24 Page 2 of 15 Page ID #:839
`
`Introduction
`
`Plaintiff respectfully seeks an order to set aside the courts order on 3/18/24 denying the
`plaintiff the ability to file the First Amedned Complaint due to irreprable harm to the plaintiff
`and prejudice the plaintiff would sufffer if the order is not granted.
`
`Plaititiff claims the foregoing is ture and correct . Plaitiff is an inventor and has been at the
`helm and participated in the seminal moment of multiple endeavors involving the development
`technology and many other profiound first mover industry projects .
`
`Plaintiff has been around long enough to notice first hand of accounts which under the normal
`instances of business has not been offered fairlt to the palintiff due to the high value of his
`ideas and bsusiness ventures. The plaintiff claims that has been targeted and that the
`defendnant use of technology and illegal scheme can be and have been used imporperly to
`steal plaintff trade secrets and also cover up evicecne of thier scheme.
`
`Argument
`
`Plaintiff argues and alleges violations of unfaitr business paractices in the tampering of
`plaintiffs device and hacking.
`
`Plaintiff should be granted leave to amend complaint and grant the seting aside of the order e
`hying plaintiff due to plaintiff being prejudiced by these New acts of the defendnants.
`
`plaintiff and partners have seen and determined under surviellance and knowledge that the
`attornehys of plaintff to be hired were tampered with.
`
`Plaintff will provide expert witness testiomony to support these allegation and claims aty the
`hearing .
`
`These tactics may go unnoticed to a "newby" but to someone who has scene the mechanism in
`its use live the planitiff has uncovered a consistent mechanism employed by the defendnats as a
`scheme used to steal trade secrets which is illegal and involved in espionage tactics .The
`defendnats uses thesen tactics and try to claim legality when at heart the defendts intentions
`are not truthfully disclosed as a " information gathersing mechanism" to then then analyze and
`then "trigger act "which can be qualifies as" a level of threat" which will then trigger the
`defendnats to act to use thier "permissions " to illegally spoilate and steal and moitor users and
`plaintiffs in an collective conspiracy to collude to obtain stolen materials and illegakly obtained
`infiormastion from its users to profit off them. apple vs NSO
`
`2
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 128 Filed 04/01/24 Page 3 of 15 Page ID #:840
`
`The forms of information can be used to interfere with the use of agents hired by the
`defendnats who ae commanded to interfere or mislead as taget and plaintiff .
`
`This infirmation is also used to be sold to it users to then be weaponize against is customers
`a nd palintiff.
`
`This has triggered break ins, murder, theft ,violation of the CFAA to illegally use defendats
`rights and permissions to enter the plaintiffs device and dectroy evidence which effects
`pleading and cases.
`
`When these acts occur over 20 years they can cause and inflict severe emotion distress and
`PTSD disorders rendering it difficult to perform and cause disability.
`
`The plaitniff was victem of type of tampering and plaintiff has had bsuines relations and
`responsibiites which have gone un satisfied and due to the losses plaintiff suffered moniterily
`from by the tampering by the defendats plaintiffs business have suffered adn require remedy
`
`Plaintiff has suffered tremendously and has severe disablity from normal activities and
`conducting work and events due to PTSD severe stress and fears of death threats and agression
`targeed upon palintiff.
`
`Plaintiff was Beverly ill and incapacitated during this time and also is recovering from a lifen
`threaending illness.
`
`Plaintiff will be prejuduced clearly if he will not be able to file a first amedned complaint as the
`attcks on the plaintiff will not stop and plaintiff requires now a restraining order from the court
`a nd will file this restraining hopefully with council.
`
`The defendats recectly also is embarking on a massive unprecedented endeavor based on
`infringment and theft of plaintiff trade secrets through this illegal mechanism of violation of
`the cfaa and is a violation under rule 37e and misprepresentationsunder the defendnant user
`policies which is a mask and vehicle for the defendatns to attempt try to legally i howver
`cover up illegally attepts and acts which infrige and users and plaintiffs trade secrets and are
`in violation ofn the espionage act. in violation of the CFAA. may be presented under seal or in
`the first amedned complaint.
`
`These defendnat are weaponizing search and devices and information owned and used by by
`un suspecting users customers and the public .the information is being taken alalayzed and
`used to alter or act on a attck to interfere and have agents mislead or misrepresent facts with
`the public, its own users the plaintiff in this matters and all of our business interations ,legal
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 128 Filed 04/01/24 Page 4 of 15 Page ID #:841
`
`endeavors , to affect conflict of intrest of atroneys representations and gain the ability to
`interfere with inventions ,partnships and legal cases and anything the defendats want to
`interfere with especially inventors which the plaintiff is.
`
`Defendnat google take the plaintiffs information gatherd and obtained illegally and conducts
`business these acts and defendant everly well is part of a scheme that has complied this data
`stolen from the plainiff and then distributed the the defendnsts partners and conspirators who
`are unammed and and named in the complaints andn used as a platform for investment for the
`express purpose to profit off the plaintiff intellectual propety .trade scecrets ,copyrights and
`patents regustered and unregidstered
`
`The defendnats intentionally conspire to prevent the plaintiff and its users from suceeding in
`thier endeavors by using illegal information gathering techneques taken from its users devices
`and property and the uses a methods and scheme organize agents to interfere with plaitiffs
`business and partnerships though espionage and affects plaintiffs outcome for desirable results
`by the use of informtion obtained illegally by the defendants and then makes clams that the
`defendnats developed the plaintiffs ideas but the reality was the defendnats stole and or
`abused thier authority and took the information through a weaponized scheme authorized by
`the defendtas on the plaintiff and other users.
`
`when the planitiff gathers this information and is keeps it safe for use its then its destroyed
`using these scheme rendiering it impossible for the plaintiff to act or in this case propertly plead
`or keep information safe for court use .and the plaitiffs first amended complaint the court
`shoud act in favor of the plaintiff
`
`authorities
`
`Under rules for excusable neglect to set aside the order ,plaintiff medical condition and
`inflicistion of PTSD and extreme stress stress hampers and impedes plaintiff from normal acts
`and the court should be liberal in this pleading too allow the plaintiff to file the first amnded
`complaint due to the recent attack by the defendats to plaintiffin the pendency of this action
`
`Plaintiff is entitle d to sancition and is entitle ted to injunctive relief and Temprory restraining
`order and will be prjudiced if he is unable to file first amneded complaint to satisy these needs
`as they require in the operative complaint.
`
`Plaintiff suffered and was medically cleared through 3/15/24 for incapcity mentally and which
`may be lengthented.
`
`Plaintiff suffered from life thretening illness which also incurred on 1/29/24 afterbeing ill on
`12/29/23 and plaintff is still recovering from
`
`4
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 128 Filed 04/01/24 Page 5 of 15 Page ID #:842
`
`Plaintiff was unable to perform at the time due to his incapcity.
`
`Under mission power this should weigh well in plaintiffs favor. Irrergdlesso f time plaintiff is
`fighting an uphill battle
`
`Rule for Fraud by acts taken by the defendant against the plaintiff should aloso allow the
`court to grant this motion and setting aside the order denying plainffs motion by the
`defendant should also allow the court to wigh wel in the plaintiffs favor
`
`The defendnats fraulent tampering with council plaintiff relied on to hire to plead his
`information and complaint is illegal
`
`The the plaintiff claims the defendnst acts of hacking and tampering indicate the the plaitiffs
`case would be meritotious with the data plaintiff kept which is and was spoilated and destroyed
`and the court should see that as weighing in the plaintiffs favor that the information would
`demonstarte favor for the plaitiffs complaint as evidence. Plaintiff would need to seek damages
`and sactions from these acts by the defendant
`
`Also the fraudulent act and also the tampering and destruction of electronic stored information
`of the plaintiff in violation of federl rule 37 e warrants destroying the work of the plaintiff
`required by the courts order impedes the plaitinff from complying with the courts order, the
`court to grant this motion to remedy the acts against the plaintiff taken by the defendant to
`willfully affect the outcome of this case and the court should also compel the defendnat to file a
`oppositon to this motion to get an answer.
`
`Violations under the Computer fraud abuse act also warrants the extesnion
`
`The tampering with council and destruction of evidence also should have the court weigh the
`fvor in the plaintiffs favor.
`
`Due to the tampering plaintiff should be allowed the grnating of this new informsation not
`avaialable due to plaintiffs incapicity at the time.
`
`Plaintiff will be prdudiced if he is unable to recover damages and meet contracted
`responsibilities
`
`Plaintiff will need to file for injunctive relief and tempranry restrining order from the acts of the
`defendants
`
`Plaintiff would be prejudiced in business and contracts which plaintiff is required to conduct and
`the denialm of the motion will prejuduce the plaitntiff from performing or seeking a
`judghement to satisfy the plaintiffs performance and responisibiites snd rights.
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 128 Filed 04/01/24 Page 6 of 15 Page ID #:843
`
`plaintiff will suffer irepprable harm a first amended complaint is not issued as he will not be
`a ble to perform in his contracts. Plaintiff will provide evidecne and expert witness testimony to
`confiormand support this statement
`
`These issues weigh in the plaintiffs favor to grant the motion.
`
`Conclusion
`
`These acts when acted upon and recognized as improper can and has induced the stress and
`incapicity at a higher level than that of the normal person.
`
`Plaintiff seeks sactions and will provide expert witness testimony and estimated to the losses
`incurreed plaintiff seeks tom remedy
`
`Plaintiff seeks the court to allow leave to amend by counil this motion if provided adn filed by
`plaintiff.
`
`Due to the tampering plaintiff should be allowed the grnating of this new informsation not
`avaialable due to plaintiffs incapicity at the time.
`
`Plaintiff will be prdudiced if he is unable to recover damages and meet contracted
`responsibilities
`
`Plaintiff will need to file for injunctive relief and tempranry restrining order from the acts of the
`defendants
`
`Plaintiff totally understands the courts requirement and plaintiiff will conform and file the first
`complaint carefully so that it cannot be tampered with and soon as the plaintiff respectfully will
`comply with the courts rules.
`
`Plaintiff would be prejudiced in business and contracts which plaintiff is required to conduct and
`the denialm of the motion will prejuduce the plaitntiff from performing or seeking a
`judghement to satisfy the plaintiffs performance and responisibiites snd rights.
`
`plaintiff will suffer irepprable harm if a first amended complaint is not allowed to be the
`operative complaint
`
`plaintiff will suffer as he will not be able to perform in his contracts and remedy losses though a
`judgment or order in plaintiffs favor
`
`. Plaintiff will provide evidecne and expert witness testimony and declaration to confiorm and
`support this statement and motion
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 128 Filed 04/01/24 Page 7 of 15 Page ID #:844
`
`Plaintiff will submit expert witness testimony and exhibits and delaration and supplment
`briefings to support this motion and wishes leave to amend
`
`Plaintiff respectfully submits this application and hope s that the court renders the decision
`after review of the defendnats opposition in plaintiffs favor
`
`declare under the penalty of perjury the foregoing is true and correct.
`
`3/28/24
`
`X G~ fir'
`
`Plaintiff Shaheryar Khan in Pro Per
`
`7
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 128 Filed 04/01/24 Page 8 of 15 Page ID #:845
`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 5 Filed 03/18/24 Page 1 of 3 Page ID #:804
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CIVIL MINUTES —GENERAL
`
`Case No. 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS
`
`Date: March 18, 2024
`
`Title
`
`Shahervar Khan v. Adam Kraemer, et al.
`
`Present: The Honorable: Maame Ewusi-Mensah Frimpong
`
`Damon Berry
`Deputy Clerk
`
`Not Reported
`Court Reporter /Recorder
`
`Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
`
`Attorneys Present for Defendants:
`
`Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE: Plaintiff's Notice and Application for Ex
`Parte Motion for An Extension of Time to File First Amended Complaint [ECF No. 95)
`
`The Court is in receipt of Plaintiff Shaheryar Khan's Ex Parte Application for an
`Extension of Time to File First Amended Complaint (ECF Nos. 115, 120, 122) and Amended Ex
`Parte Application for Extension of Time to File First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 123,
`collectively, the "Ex Parte Filings"), as well as Defendant Google LLC's Opposition to
`Shaheryar Khan's Ex Parte Motion for an Extension of time to File an Amended Complaint
`(ECF No. 118).
`
`In the Central District, a party seeking ex pane relief must comply with (1) the Local
`Rules and Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and (2) the standards set forth in Mission Power
`Engineering Co. v. Continental Casualty Co., 883 F. Supp. 488, 492 (C.D. Cal. 1995).
`
`Local Rule 7-19.1 requires a party filing an ex pane application to:
`
`L.R. 7-19 Ex Parte Application. An application for an ex pane order shall be
`accompanied by a memorandum containing, if known, the name, address,
`telephone number and e-mail address of counsel for the opposing party, the
`reasons for the seeking of an ex pane order, and points and authorities in support
`thereof. An applicant also shall lodge the proposed ex parte order.
`
`CV-90 (03/15)
`
`Civil Minutes —General
`
`Page 1 of 3
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 128 Filed 04/01/24 Page 9 of 15 Page ID #:846
`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 125 Filed 03/18/24 Page 2 of 3 Page ID #:805
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CIVIL MINUTES —GENERAL
`
`Case No. 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS
`
`Date: March 18, 2024
`
`Title
`
`Shahervar Khan v. Adam Kraemer. et al.
`
`L.R. 7-19.1 Notice of Application. It shall be the duty of the attorney so applying
`(a) to make reasonable, good faith efforts orally to advise counsel for all other
`parties, if known, of the date and substance of the proposed ex pane application
`and (b) to advise the Court in writing and under oath of efforts to contact other
`counsel and whether any other counsel, after such advice, opposes the application.
`C.D. Cal. R. 7-19, 7-19.1. ~
`
`Here, several of Khan's Ex Parte Filings all indicate that Khan reached out to opposing
`counsel to alert them about the ex pane filings prior to filing. See, e.g., ECF No. 1 l 5 at 2-3, ECF
`No. 123 at 2. Thus, Khan has complied with the notice portion of Local Rule 7-19.1
`
`Under Mission Power, a party seeking ex pane relief must establish (1) that the
`requesting party will be irreparably prejudiced if the motion is heard on a normal schedule and
`(2) that the requesting party did not create the crisis requiring ex pane relief.
`
`Here, Khan does not explicitly discuss the prejudice he would face if his motion were
`heard in accordance with regular procedures. However, the Court notes that Khan asks for an
`extension to file his First Amended Complaint ("FAC"), see e.g., ECF No. 115 at 2, that would
`moot the pending motions to dismiss, which could be granted with prejudice. See ECF No. 66.
`Thus, it is conceivable that Khan could be irreparably prejudiced.
`
`However, the second Mission Power factor does not weigh in Khan's favor. Khan has
`moved several times to extend the deadline to file his FAC~riginally April 21, 2023, almost a
`full year ago. Khan states that more time is necessary because he needs to retain counsel and re-
`draft his FAC due to a hacking incident. ECF No. 115 at 2. While the hacking incident is new,
`each of Khan's prior requests have reiterated Khan's need to secure counsel. Khan also states
`that he is still under treatment for his medical conditions. ECF No. 115 at 2. Although the Court
`understands that medical issues are beyond Khan's control, the deadline cannot be extended
`indefinitely until Khan's personal health issues are resolved. The Court has provided Khan with
`ample time—a little over 10 months measured from April 25, 2023, the date the Court granted
`Khan's first ex pane, to present day—to procure counsel and file a FAC. The Court thus
`
`Pro se litigants must comply with the Local Rules. L.R. 83-2.2.3.
`
`CV-90 (03/15)
`
`Civil Minutes —General
`
`Page 2 of 3
`
`u~
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 128 Filed 04/01/24 Page 10 of 15 Page ID #:847
`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 125 F l~ri 03/18/24 Page 3 of 3 Page ID #:806
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRI~ ~' COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CAi_,[FORNIA
`
`CIVIL MINUTES —GENERAL
`
`Case No. 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS
`
`Date: March 18, 2024
`
`Title
`
`Shahervar Khan v. Adam Kraemer, et al.
`
`DENIES Khan's Ex Parte Filings. The Court will issue a separate order setting a hearing on the
`pending motions to dismiss.
`
`Initials of Preparer DBE
`
`CV-90 (03/15)
`
`Civil Minutes —General
`
`Page 3 of 3
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 128 Filed 04/01/24 Page 11 of 15 Page ID #:848
`
`DATE: 3/26/2024
`
`RE Meet and ConferAttention Every Well And Google Defendants:
`
`Susman Godfrey : K. Pachman Fax 310 789-3150
`
`Perkins Coie Alisha Burgin Fax 310-788-3399
`
`Case Number 222 CV 02333 Shaheryar Khan vs Adam Kramer; Google; Apple ;Everly Well Et AI
`
`Plaintiff planning to file a motion to reconsider or set aside the courts ruling on 3/18/ 24
`denying plaintiffs motion to extend time to file first amedned complaint
`
`Due to severe illness and medical treatment and deadly infection .Plaintiff need to tend to
`immediatley and recover from infection which became worse thorugh today .Plaintiff was not
`cleared medically through this time and the court was unclear about this. Plaintiff still has life
`threatending matter related to the 1/29/24 notice to Defendnats and will continue to seek
`medical treatment.
`
`Plaintiff also found issues with council which the court did not know about that will be plead
`into this motion.
`
`Plainitff will be preudiced due to unfair business practices by the defendants act desptroying
`court materials of plaintiff and the requirement to amend issues retaled to federal
`investigation.
`
`Plaintiiff will be require to have expert witness testimony and issue before the Gout for this
`hearing as well to testify and present declaratrion evidence.
`
`Judge Frimpong issued an order requesting that any communication should be conducted in
`accordance to Federal Rules which Plaintiff intneds to follow,
`
`Plaintiff also would like to discuss and seek a stipulation if possible or settlement
`
`Please Email me at syst.82817@outlook.com to set a time to meet and confer to dicsuss this
`
`issue and feel free to email any agreeements that defendnats council may be agreeable to ton
`
`the information in the above request. After noon tomorrow will work or Thursday before noon
`also can work this week.
`
`Respectfully
`
`Shaheryar Khan
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 128 Filed 04/01/24 Page 12 of 15 Page ID #:849
`
`Khan v. Google et al. (2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS)
`
`Taylor Rodgers, Torryn (Perkins Coie) <TRodgers@perkinscoie.com>
`Tue 3/26/2024 9:29 PM
`Tc
`Cc:Burgin, Alisha C. (Perkins Coie) <ABurgin@perkinscoie.com>
`
`M r. Khan,
`
`As you know, we are counsel for Google in this matter. I am writing per your request to meet and confer regarding
`your fax that we received today. Please feel free to give me a call tomorrow after noon, or Friday morning. You
`can reach me at 415-344-7122.
`
`Thank you,
`Torryn
`
`Torryn Rodgers ~ Perkins Coie LLP
`ASSOCIATE
`
`Shelher/hers
`
`505 Howard Street Suite 1000
`
`San Francisco. CA 94105
`
`D.+1.115.344.7122
`
`F. +1,415..144.7322
`
`E. TRodgers ,perkinscoie.com
`
`NdTICE: This communication may contain privileged or other confidential information. If you have received it in error, please advise the sender by reply
`
`email and immediately delete the message and any attachments without copying or disclosing the contents. Thank you.
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 128 Filed 04/01/24 Page 13 of 15 Page ID #:850
`
`Khan v. Kraemer
`
`Krysta Pachman <KPachman@susmangodfrey.com>
`Tue 3/262024 8:37 PM
`
`To'.
`Mr. Khan,
`
`received your fax.
`
`I'm not available tomorrow afternoon. I'm available Thursday before 10 a.m. Please feel free to calf me
`then. If you are unable to reach me, you can note in your papers that Everly Well opposes the relief you
`are seeking.
`
`Best,
`Krysta
`
`Krysta Kauble Pachman ~ Partner ~ Susman Godfrey L.L.P.
`1900 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1400, Los Angeles, CA 90067
`(310) 789-3118 ~ kpachman(~susmang dfrey.cc~m
`
`This e-mail contains privileged and confidential information, which may be subject to the attorney/client privilege and/or attorney work
`product protection. If you received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it immediately.
`
`~~
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 128 Filed 04/01/24 Page 14 of 15 Page ID #:851
`
`SPINE AND SPORTS INSTITUTE
`PAYAM VAHEDIFAR, M.D.
`
`WORK NOTE
`
`Patient Name: Shah Khan DOB: 07/05/1974
`Patient to remain off work from 1 1/18/2023 thru 02/28/2024.
`If you have any questions, please call the office at 818-986-0200
`
`Signed: /~
`Payam Vahedifar, M.D.
`
`Date: 11/30/2023
`
`~~a.
`'~
`
`.........................................................................................................................................................................................................
`ENCINO
`16633 Ventura Blvd Suite 802
`Encino, CA 91436
`P:818.986.0200 F: 818.986.4393
`
`~—~-
`
`~_ ~
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-02333-MEMF-AS Document 128 Filed 04/01/24 Page 15 of 15 Page ID #:852
`
`SPINE AND SPORTS INSTITUTE
`
`PAYAM VAHEDIFAR, M.D.
`
`WORK NOTE
`
`Patient Name: Shah Khan DOB: 07/05/1974
`
`May return to work on:
`
`q May return to regular work full time
`
`q May return to regular work, but should avoid heavy lifting (over 201bs.)
`
`q May return to light work
`
`q May return to work
`
`hours per day
`
`q May resume light work and gradually do heavier work as time progresses
`
`q Ma esume light work with restrictions as listed:
`
`Other: The patient will remain off of work from 2-28-2024 - 5-24-2024
`
`Signed: ~
`Payam Vahedifar, M.D.
`
`Date: 03/14/2024
`
`...............................................................................................................................................................................................................
`ENCINO
`16633 Ventura Blvd Suite 802
`Encino, CA 91436
`P:818.986.0200 F: 818.986.4393
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket