throbber
Case 2:22-cv-07347 Document 1 Filed 10/10/22 Page 1 of 8 Page ID #:1
`
`
`
`Stephen M. Doniger (SBN 179314)
`stephen@donigerlawfirm.com
`Trevor W. Barrett (SBN 287174)
`tbarrett@donigerlawfirm.com
`Kelsey Schultz (SBN 328159)
`kschultz@donigerlawfirm.com
`DONIGER / BURROUGHS
`603 Rose Avenue
`Venice California 90291
`Telephone: (310) 590-1820
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`
`Case No.:
`
`
`
`
`UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
`CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
`
`CARIBBEAN BLUES, INC., doing business
`as “EKB TEXTILES,” a California
`Corporation,
`
`Plaintiff,
`
`
`v.
`
`ZULILY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
`company, and DOES 1-10,
`
`Defendants.
`
`
`
`
` PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT FOR
`COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT
`
`
`
`
` Jury Trial Demanded
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`COMPLAINT
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-07347 Document 1 Filed 10/10/22 Page 2 of 8 Page ID #:2
`
`
`
`This Court has federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and
`
`CARIBBEAN BLUES, INC., doing business as “EKB Textiles” (“Plaintiff” or
`“EKB”), by and through its undersigned attorneys, hereby prays to this honorable
`Court for relief based on the following:
`JURISDICTION AND VENUE
`This action arises under the Copyright Act of 1976, Title 17 U.S.C., § 101
`
`1.
`et seq.
`2.
`1338 (a)
`3.
`Venue in this judicial district is proper under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(c) and
`1400(a) in that this is the judicial district in which a substantial part of the acts and
`omissions giving rise to the claims occurred.
`PARTIES
`4.
`Plaintiff is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the
`State of California with its principal place of business located at 777 E Washington
`Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90021.
`5.
`Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendant
`ZULILY, LLC, (“ZULILY”), doing business as “ZULILY” is a Delaware limited
`liability company with its principal place of business located at 300 Deschutes Way
`SW, Suite 304, Tumwater, WA 98501, and is doing business with the State of
`California.
`6.
`Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendant
`ZULILY owns and operates https://www.zulily.com.
`7.
`Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendants
`DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, are other parties not yet identified who have infringed
`Plaintiff’s copyrights, have contributed to the infringement of Plaintiff’s copyrights,
`or have engaged in one or more of the wrongful practices alleged herein. The true
`names, whether corporate, individual or otherwise, of Defendants 1 through 10,
`inclusive, are presently unknown to Plaintiff, which therefore sues said Defendants
`
`2
`COMPLAINT
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-07347 Document 1 Filed 10/10/22 Page 3 of 8 Page ID #:3
`
`
`
`by such fictitious names, and will seek leave to amend this Complaint to show their
`true names and capacities when same have been ascertained.
`8.
`Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that at all times
`relevant hereto each of the Defendants was the agent, affiliate, officer, director,
`manager, principal, alter-ego, and/or employee of the remaining Defendants and was
`at all times acting within the scope of such agency, affiliation, alter-ego relationship
`and/or employment; and actively participated in or subsequently ratified and/or
`adopted each of the acts or conduct alleged, with full knowledge of all the facts and
`circumstances, including, but not limited to, full knowledge of each violation of
`Plaintiff’s rights and the damages to Plaintiff proximately caused thereby.
`9.
`ZULILY and Does 1-10 will collectively be referred to as “Defendants”
`herein.
`
`CLAIMS RELATED TO EKB DESIGN # 9383
`10.
`Plaintiff owns an original two-dimensional artwork used for purposes of
`textile printing entitled EKB Design # 9383 (the “Subject Design”) which has been
`registered with the United States Copyright Office under Registration No. VA 2-114-
`907.
`
`11.
`Prior to the acts complained of herein, Plaintiff widely disseminated
`fabric bearing the Subject Design to numerous parties in the fashion and apparel
`industries.
`12.
`Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that following its
`distribution of the Subject Design, Plaintiff learned that Defendants created, sold,
`manufactured, caused to be manufactured, imported and/or distributed fabric and/or
`garments comprised of fabric featuring unauthorized reproductions of the Subject
`Design or designs which are substantially similar to the Subject Design (hereinafter
`“Offending Products”). Offending Products includes but are not limited to the
`garments sold by ZULILY, under SKU ROMANTICHUT_TOM1025-
`P_PRINTING_S, bearing the label “Romantichut” as shown in the below screen
`
`3
`COMPLAINT
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-07347 Document 1 Filed 10/10/22 Page 4 of 8 Page ID #:4
`
`
`
`capture:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`13.
`Indeed, this is not the first time ZULILY has infringed the Subject
`Design. On or about November 3, 2020, counsel for EKB sent a cease-and-desist
`demand to ZULILY after purchasing garments bearing the same illicit reproductions
`of the Subject Design that are at issue in this case. The parties reached a confidential
`settlement of that matter with an effective date of January 13, 2021. Importantly, no
`license or authorization for future sales was here was provided as part of that
`resolution. Thus, Plaintiff believes and alleges that the infringement at issue was
`committed with actual knowledge of Plaintiff’s rights such that said acts of copyright
`infringement were, and are willful.
`/ / /
`/ / /
`/ / /
`
`
`
`
`4
`COMPLAINT
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-07347 Document 1 Filed 10/10/22 Page 5 of 8 Page ID #:5
`
`
`
`14. A representative image of the Subject Design and a detailed exemplar of
`Offending Products are set forth below:
`Subject Design:
`
`
`Offending Product:
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`5
`COMPLAINT
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-07347 Document 1 Filed 10/10/22 Page 6 of 8 Page ID #:6
`
`
`
`FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
`(For Copyright Infringement - Against All Defendants, and Each)
`15.
` Plaintiff repeats, realleges and incorporates herein by reference as
`though fully set forth the allegations contained in the preceding paragraphs of this
`Complaint.
`16. Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendants,
`and each of them, had access to the Subject Design, including, without limitation,
`through (a) access to Plaintiff’s showroom, strike offs, and/or design library; (b)
`access to illegally distributed copies of the Subject Design by third-party vendors
`and/or DOE Defendants, including without limitation international and/or overseas
`converters and printing mills; and/or (c) access to garments in the marketplace
`manufactured with lawfully printed fabric bearing the Subject Design.
`17.
` Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that one or more
`of the Defendants manufactures garments and/or is a garment vendor. Plaintiff is
`further informed and believes and thereon alleges that said Defendant(s), and each of
`them, has an ongoing business relationship with Defendant retailers, and each of
`them, and supplied garments to said retailers, which garments infringed the Subject
`Design in that said garments were composed of fabric which featured unauthorized
`print designs that were identical or substantially similar to the Subject Design, or
`were an illegal modification thereof.
`18.
` Plaintiff is informed and believes and thereon alleges that Defendants,
`and each of them, infringed Plaintiff’s copyright by creating, making and/or
`developing directly infringing and/or derivative works from the Subject Design and
`by producing, distributing and/or selling Subject Products through a nationwide
`network of retail stores, catalogues, and through on-line websites.
`19. Due to Defendants’, and each of their, acts of infringement, Plaintiff has
`suffered damages in an amount to be established at trial.
`
`6
`COMPLAINT
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-07347 Document 1 Filed 10/10/22 Page 7 of 8 Page ID #:7
`
`
`
`20.
` Due to Defendants’, and each of their, acts of copyright infringement as
`alleged herein, Defendants, and each of them, have obtained profits they would not
`otherwise have realized but for their infringement of the Subject Design. As such,
`Plaintiff is entitled to disgorgement of Defendants’, and each of their, profits
`attributable to the infringement of the Subject Design in an amount to be established
`at trial, or in the alternative statutory damages.
`21. And this is not the first time ZULILY has infringed the Subject Design.
`On or about November 3, 2020, counsel for EKB sent a cease-and-desist demand to
`ZULILY after purchasing garments bearing the same illicit reproductions of the
`Subject Design that are at issue in this case. The parties reached a confidential
`settlement of that matter with an effective date of January 13, 2021. Importantly, no
`license or authorization for future sales was here was provided as part of that
`resolution. Thus, Plaintiff believes and alleges that the infringement at issue was
`committed with actual knowledge of Plaintiff’s rights such that said acts of copyright
`infringement were, and are willful.
`PRAYER FOR RELIEF
`Wherefore, Plaintiff prays for judgment as follows:
`a. That Defendants, their agents and employees be enjoined from
`infringing Plaintiff’s copyrights in any manner, specifically those for the
`Subject Design;
`b. That Plaintiff be awarded all profits of Defendants plus all losses of
`Plaintiff, plus any other monetary advantage gained by the Defendants
`through their infringement, the exact sum to be proven at the time of
`trial, or, if elected before final judgment, statutory damages as available
`under the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 505 et seq.;
`c. That a trust be imposed over the revenues derived by Defendants, and
`each of them, through the sales or distribution of the product at issue;
`
`7
`COMPLAINT
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

`

`Case 2:22-cv-07347 Document 1 Filed 10/10/22 Page 8 of 8 Page ID #:8
`
`
`
`d. That Plaintiff be awarded its attorneys’ fees as available under the
`Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 505 et seq.;
`e. That Defendants, and each of them, account to Plaintiff for their profits
`and any damages sustained by Plaintiff arising from the foregoing acts
`of infringement;
`f. That Plaintiff be awarded pre-judgment interest as allowed by law;
`g. That Plaintiff be awarded the costs of this action; and
`h. That Plaintiff be awarded such further legal and equitable relief as the
`Court deems proper.
`Plaintiff demands a jury trial on all issues so triable pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
`
`38 and the 7th Amendment to the United States Constitution.
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Dated: October 10, 2022
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`
`Respectfully submitted,
`
`By: /s/ Stephen M Doniger
`Stephen M. Doniger, Esq.
`
`
`Kelsey M. Schultz, Esq.
`DONIGER / BURROUGHS
`Attorneys for Plaintiff
`
`8
`COMPLAINT
`
`1
`
`2
`
`3
`
`4
`
`5
`
`6
`
`7
`
`8
`
`9
`
`10
`
`11
`
`12
`
`13
`
`14
`
`15
`
`16
`
`17
`
`18
`
`19
`
`20
`
`21
`
`22
`
`23
`
`24
`
`25
`
`26
`
`27
`
`28
`
`
`
`

This document is available on Docket Alarm but you must sign up to view it.


Or .

Accessing this document will incur an additional charge of $.

After purchase, you can access this document again without charge.

Accept $ Charge
throbber

Still Working On It

This document is taking longer than usual to download. This can happen if we need to contact the court directly to obtain the document and their servers are running slowly.

Give it another minute or two to complete, and then try the refresh button.

throbber

A few More Minutes ... Still Working

It can take up to 5 minutes for us to download a document if the court servers are running slowly.

Thank you for your continued patience.

This document could not be displayed.

We could not find this document within its docket. Please go back to the docket page and check the link. If that does not work, go back to the docket and refresh it to pull the newest information.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

You need a Paid Account to view this document. Click here to change your account type.

Your account does not support viewing this document.

Set your membership status to view this document.

With a Docket Alarm membership, you'll get a whole lot more, including:

  • Up-to-date information for this case.
  • Email alerts whenever there is an update.
  • Full text search for other cases.
  • Get email alerts whenever a new case matches your search.

Become a Member

One Moment Please

The filing “” is large (MB) and is being downloaded.

Please refresh this page in a few minutes to see if the filing has been downloaded. The filing will also be emailed to you when the download completes.

Your document is on its way!

If you do not receive the document in five minutes, contact support at support@docketalarm.com.

Sealed Document

We are unable to display this document, it may be under a court ordered seal.

If you have proper credentials to access the file, you may proceed directly to the court's system using your government issued username and password.


Access Government Site

We are redirecting you
to a mobile optimized page.





Document Unreadable or Corrupt

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket

We are unable to display this document.

Refresh this Document
Go to the Docket